Propofol Anesthesia Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam vs. propofol for general anesthesia with tracheal intubation: Systematic review and meta‑analysis

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam vs. propofol for general anesthesia with tracheal intubation: Systematic review and meta‑analysis

Meta-analysis study on anesthetic sedation recovery and onset times in pediatric and elderly patients undergoing CT and MRI.

Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are crucial diagnostic modalities that require patients to remain immobile for extended periods, with anesthesia sometimes used for comfort and image quality enhancement. The study compares dexmedetomidine and propofol in reducing recovery time and sedation onset in pediatric and elderly patients undergoing CT and MRI procedures. A meta-analysis of fifteen studies assessing recovery time, sedation onset, and failed sedation between dexmedetomidine and propofol in pediatric and elderly patients during CT and MRI was conducted. The study indicated that the administration of anaesthesia markedly improved patient compliance and reduced motion artefacts in both CT and MRI (P<0.00001, I2=94%). The meta-analysis indicated that the mean difference (MD) in the onset of sedation was significantly faster in the control group (P<0.00001, I2=96%). The study reveals that dexmedetomidine and propofol anesthesia can improve patient image quality during CT and MRI procedures by reducing motion artefacts. Dexmedetomidine sedated people more quickly than propofol, but no significant differences in sedation duration were observed.

Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol for Intravenous Anesthesia on Trigeminocardiac Reflex in Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol for Intravenous Anesthesia on Trigeminocardiac Reflex in Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Ketamine on the Bispectral Index, Spectral Edge Frequency, and Surgical Pleth Index During Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia: An Observational Prospective Trial.

Ketamine administration during stable propofol anesthesia is known to be associated with an increase in bispectral index (BIS) but a "deepening" in the level of hypnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the effect-site concentration of ketamine (CeK) and 2 electroencephalogram (EEG)-derived parameters, the BIS and spectral edge frequency (SEF95), after the administration of a ketamine bolus. Secondary aims included investigating the BIS and SEF95 variations with time and changes in the surgical pleth index (SPI). We conducted an observational, prospective, single-center study analyzing intraoperative data from 14 adult female patients undergoing breast oncologic surgery. During stable propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) anesthesia, a ketamine analgesic bolus was delivered with the target CeK set to 1 μg.mL-1 (Domino model) corresponding to a dose of 0.57 mg.kg-1 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.56-0.57 mg.kg-1). Once the CeK reached a value of 1 μg.mL-1, the target CeK was set to 0 μg.mL-1. We determined the median BIS, SEF95, and SPI trends with time and as a function of the modeled CeK. BIS and SEF95 showed no significant change from when ketamine was administered to when CeK=1 μg.mL-1, but a significant increase was observed at lower CeKs. The maximum BIS was reached at 16.0 minutes [10.2-22.7 minutes] after CeK=1 μg.mL-1, at CeK=0.22 μg.mL-1 [0.12-0.41 μg.mL-1]. The peak SEF95 value was observed at 10.0 minutes [8.62-14.1 minutes] after CeK=1 μg.mL-1, at CeK=0.43 μg.mL-1 [0.25-0.50 μg.mL-1]. No significant association was found between CeK and the registered SPI values. Our results show that BIS and SEF95, but not SPI, follow a CeK-dependent trend after administering a ketamine bolus. Interestingly, their peak values were not reached at CeK=1 μg.mL-1, but after several minutes after the drug infusion at CeKs in the 0.2 to 0.5 μg.mL-1 range. This may be explained by the specific pharmacodynamics of ketamine and its varying effects at different concentrations, as well as by the time delay associated with the calculation of the BIS.

Neuronal excitation-inhibition imbalance in the basolateral amygdala is involved in propofol-mediated enhancement of fear memory

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with glutamatergic neuron hyperactivation in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) brain area, while GABAergic interneurons in the BLA modulate glutamatergic neuron excitability. Studies have shown that propofol exerts its effects through potentiation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid. The neuronal mechanism by which propofol anesthesia modulates fear memory is currently unknown. Here, we used optogenetics and chemogenetics to suppress glutamatergic neurons or activate GABAergic interneurons in the BLA to assess alterations in neuronal excitation-inhibition balance and investigate fear memory. The excitability of glutamatergic neurons in the BLA was significantly reduced by the suppression of glutamatergic neurons or activation of GABAergic interneurons, while propofol-mediated enhancement of fear memory was attenuated. We suggest that propofol anesthesia could reduce the excitability of GABAergic neurons through activation of GABAA receptors, subsequently increasing the excitability of glutamatergic neurons in the mice BLA; the effect of propofol on enhancing mice fear memory might be mediated by strengthening glutamatergic neuronal excitability and decreasing the excitability of GABAergic neurons in the BLA; neuronal excitation-inhibition imbalance in the BLA might be important in mediating the enhancement of fear memory induced by propofol.

A Comparison of Remimazolam versus Propofol on Blood Pressure Changes During Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Intraoperative hypotension is the most common adverse event in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and is usually attributed to the vasodilatory effect of the anesthetic. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the impact of remimazolam versus propofol on blood pressure changes during the therapeutic ERCP procedure. Adult patients scheduled for elective therapeutic ERCP were randomized to receive either remimazolam or propofol anesthesia (40 patients in each group). The primary outcomes included the change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during induction and the area under the baseline (AUB), calculated as the blood pressure below baseline multiplied by the duration, throughout the procedure. These measures, respectively, indicated the severity of blood pressure decrease during anesthesia induction and the overall impact of blood pressure changes throughout the procedure. Any incidences of hypotension, defined as MAP <65 mm Hg for at least 1 minute, were recorded. The recovery time and any adverse events were also reported. The change in MAP after induction was smaller in the remimazolam group compared to the propofol group (-7.5 [-14.0 to 0] mm Hg vs -25.0 [-33.8 to -14.3] mm Hg), with a median difference of 17.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.0-22.0; P <.001). The AUB in the remimazolam group was less than in the propofol group (-373 [-82 to -854] mm Hg·min vs -705 [-272 to -1100] mm Hg·min), with a median difference of 255 mm Hg·min (95% CI, 29-477; P =.021). The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower for remimazolam than propofol (5% vs 30%; P =.006). There were no serious adverse events in either group. Remimazolam may be considered as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia during therapeutic ERCP procedures, with the potential advantage of stable hemodynamics.

Measuring the dynamic balance of integration and segregation underlying consciousness, anesthesia, and sleep in humans

Consciousness requires a dynamic balance of integration and segregation in brain networks. We report an fMRI-based metric, the integration-segregation difference (ISD), which captures two key network properties: network efficiency (integration) and clustering (segregation). With this metric, we quantify brain state transitions from conscious wakefulness to unresponsiveness induced by the anesthetic propofol. The observed changes in ISD suggest a profound shift towards the segregation of brain networks during anesthesia. A common unimodal-transmodal sequence of disintegration and reintegration occurs in brain networks during, respectively, loss and return of responsiveness. Machine learning models using integration and segregation data accurately identify awake vs. unresponsive states and their transitions. Metastability (dynamic recurrence of non-equilibrium transient states) is more effectively explained by integration, while complexity (diversity of neural activity) is more closely linked with segregation. A parallel analysis of sleep states produces similar findings. Our results demonstrate that the ISD reliably indexes states of consciousness.

Postoperative quality of recovery comparison between ciprofol and propofol in total intravenous anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic major abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

Study objectivesWe conducted a non-inferiority study to assess the postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) in elderly patients receiving ciprofol or propofol total intravenous anesthersia(TIVA)after elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, with QoR-15 scores as the main measure. DesignA prospective, double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted in the theater, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and the ward. Participants144 elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) were randomly assigned to either the ciprofol group or the propofol group. InterventionsThe ciprofol group received continuous infusion of ciprofol with remifentanil, and the propofol group received infusion of propofol with remifentanil. Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the QoR-15 on the first postoperative day (POD1), assessed in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, with the mean difference between groups compared to a non-inferiority threshold of −8. Additional assessments included QoR-15 scores on POD2, 3, and 5 for both analysis sets. Other evaluated perioperative value factors included hemodynamic parameters and injection discomfort in the intention-to-treat analysis. A linear mixed model was utilized to examine the impact of group-time interactions on hemodynamic data and QoR-15. Main resultsThe QoR-15 scores on POD1 in the ciprofol group were non-inferior to those in the propofol group both in intention-to-treat set (mean [95 %CI], 95.9[93.7–98.2] vs. 95.6 [93.3–97.8]; mean difference [95 % CI], 0.4 [−2.8–3.5]; P<0.001 for noninferiority) and per-protocol set (mean [95 %CI], 96.7 [94.4–99.0] vs. 95.7 [93.4–98.0]; mean difference [95 % CI], 1.0 [−2.2–4.3]; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Comparable outcomes were noted on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5 following the procedure in both analysis sets. Additionally: compared with propofol group, the occurrence of injection pain was lower (2.8 % vs. 27.8 %, P < 0.001); the hypotension was less frequent (33.3 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.012); the bradycardia was more common (38.9 % vs. 23.6 %, P = 0.048). ConclusionsCiprofol is not inferior to propofol in QoR. Ciprofol can be suitably administered to elderly patients undergoing elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery.

Immediate effects of propofol on mood: a randomized comparison of two doses in a cohort with depression.

The intravenous anesthetic propofol is known to induce positive mood effects during routine clinical use, suggesting it might be repurposed as an antidepressant, but also raising concerns about abuse potential. How propofol's acute effects vary by dose and with repeated infusions is unknown. This exploratory analysis aimed to (1) compare the immediate mood effects of propofol administered at two different doses, (2) describe how those mood effects change with repeated infusions, and (3) evaluate whether acute mood improvement predicts later antidepressant response. Twenty-four adults with moderate-to-severe treatment-resistant depression were randomized into two dosing groups. Six low- or high-dose propofol infusions were administered under blinded conditions over a two-week period. Self-reported mood states were recorded before and after each infusion using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS-X). Abuse potential was evaluated with the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ-5). At the first infusion, propofol induced acute improvements in PANAS-X Sadness, Fear, Joviality, and Serenity scales (p < 0.002), independent of dose. Over the series of six infusions, acute changes in Sadness, Fear, and Joviality, but not Serenity, diminished with infusion number (p < 0.002). The DEQ-5 "want more" rating decreased across infusions (p = 0.002). Changes in PANAS-X scales with the first infusion did not predict later improvement in depression severity (p > 0.05). Cumulative changes in mood states observed with repeated infusions suggest that propofolengages adaptive mechanisms in mood circuitry. Subjective responses with repeated infusions do not indicate increasing potential for abuse in this patient population.

Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol as Anesthetic for Patients Undergoing Painless Colonoscopy.

Ciprofol is a novel propofol analogue with a characteristic of hemodynamic stability. At present, there is a lack of research comparing the hemodynamic stability of ciprofol and propofol during painless colonoscopy. In this study, we aim to test the hypothesis that ciprofol is superior to propofol in terms of hemodynamic stability for sedation anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy. A total of 222 patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in group P (n=112) and group C (n=110) received propofol and ciprofol sedation, respectively. Noninvasive blood pressure were monitored starting from induction (T0) to the end of the procedure, at 2-min intervals (T1 to T10). Heart rate variability (HRV), pain injection, Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation(MOAA/S) score, body movement, doses of norepinephrine, modified Aldrete score, drug-related adverse reactions, and patient satisfaction and endoscopist satisfaction were recorded. In group C, fewer patients experienced a decrease in blood pressure with a higher HRV after induction sedation, the incidence of pain injection was reduced, the amount of norepinephrine dose was decreased, patient satisfaction was increased compared with group P (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in induction time, modified Aldrete score, alertness time, drug-related adverse reactions, and endoscopist satisfaction. Our study indicated intravenous induction with ciprofol was superior, with regard to hemodynamic stability and reduced injection pain, than induction with propofol for anesthesia in patients undergoing painless colonoscopy. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200061814).

The effect of Amantadine on recovery, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and pain after propofol anesthesia in mice

IntroductionPostoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) encompasses a spectrum of cognitive impairments following surgery, attributed to disruptions in brain homeostasis. The pathogenesis involves glutamate toxicity, GABA receptor dysfunction, and alterations in NMDA and AMPA receptors. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-anesthetic amantadine administration on postoperative recovery time, POCD, and stress-related pain levels when combined with propofol anesthesia. MethodsTwenty-four adult male BALB/C mice were divided into four groups: Control, Propofol, Amantadine, and Amantadine+Propofol. Amantadine and propofol doses were administered intraperitoneally based on previous literature. Recovery time, pain levels (assessed via tail pinch and hot plate tests), cognitive functions (evaluated through Morris Water Maze), and locomotor activity (measured via Open Field Test) were recorded. ResultsAmantadine administration significantly reduced recovery time from propofol anesthesia, prolonged pain perception, and preserved cognitive functions compared to propofol alone. The time spent in the target quadrant in the Morris Water Maze was significantly longer in groups receiving amantadine. Additionally, the distance covered until finding the platform was significantly shorter in the propofol-only group. DiscussionAmantadine's neuroprotective effects, attributed to its antagonistic action on glutamate and NMDA receptors, mitigate the detrimental effects of propofol on cognitive function and pain perception. This study highlights the potential of combining amantadine with propofol to enhance postoperative outcomes. ConclusionAmantadine administration before propofol anesthesia positively influenced postoperative recovery, cognitive function preservation, and stress-related pain perception in mice. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic strategy to mitigate POCD and pain associated with surgery.

Respiratory complications of propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in children aged 1 month to 3 years: a randomized trial

To evaluate the effect of propofol, sevoflurane, and dexmedetomidine on respiratory complications in children undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted among 120 children aged 1 month to 3 years undergoing FOB. The patients were randomized into 3 groups (n=40) for anesthesia induction with sevoflurane inhalation, 1 mg/kg propofol, or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine before bronchoscopy, and the changes in hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, and respiratory complications during and after the procedure were assessed. The patients' heart rate during bronchoscopy was significantly lower and the mean arterial blood pressure significantly higher in dexmedetomidine group than in sevoflurane and propofol groups (P < 0.05). Cough during bronchoscopy did not occur in any of the cases in propofol group, while the highest frequency of cough was recorded in dexmedetomidine group. The incidence of laryngospasm in the propofol group (12.5%) was significantly lower than those in sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine groups (30% and 32.5%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Sevoflurane and propofol are safe and suitable for anesthesia induction in children below 3 years of age undergoing diagnostic FOB and can achieve better sedative effect and lower the incidences of cough and respiratory complications as compared with dexmedetomidine.

Effect of quantitative consciousness index on seizure parameters during electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is both an effective treatment for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and a noxious stimulus. Although some studies have explored the effect of sedation depth on seizure parameters in ECT, there is little research on the noxious stimulation response to ECT. In this study, we used two electroencephalography (EEG)-derived indices, the quantitative consciousness (qCON) index and quantitative nociceptive (qNOX) index, to monitor sedation, hypnosis, and noxious stimulation response in patients with MDD undergoing acute ECT. AIM To evaluate the effect of anesthesia depth based on the qCON and qNOX indices on seizure parameters. METHODS Patients with MDD (n = 24) underwent acute bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia. Before ECT, the patients were randomly divided into three groups according to qCON scores (qCON60-70, qCON50-60, and qCON40-50). Continuous qCON monitoring was performed 3 minutes before and during ECT, and the qCON, qNOX, vital signs, EEG seizure parameters, and complications during the recovery period were recorded. The 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Zung’s Self-rating Depression Scale, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were evaluated before the first ECT session, after the fourth ECT session, and after the full course of ECT. RESULTS A total of 193 ECT sessions were performed on 24 participants. The qCON index significantly affected the EEG seizure duration, peak mid-ictal amplitude, and maximum heart rate during ECT (P &lt; 0.05). The qNOX index significantly affected the post-ictal suppression index (P &lt; 0.05). Age, number of ECT sessions, and anesthetic-ECT time intervals also had a significant effect on EEG seizure parameters (P &lt; 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in complications, 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, Zung’s Self-rating Depression Scale scores, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores among the three groups (P &gt; 0.05). CONCLUSION Electrical stimulation at a qCON index of 60-70 resulted in better EEG seizure parameters without increasing complications in patients with MDD undergoing bilateral temporal ECT under propofol anesthesia.

Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis

BackgroundRemimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has been recently introduced as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia. While both agents have been compared in terms of safety and efficacy, their relative effects on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) remain unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on subjective QoR in surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia.MethodsMedline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 28, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol in terms of postoperative QoR. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. QoR score on postoperative day (POD) 1 (primary outcome), QoR scores on PODs 2–3, QoR dimensions, time to loss of consciousness, other recovery characteristics, and rescue analgesia requirement were evaluated using random-effects meta-analyses.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 13 studies published between 2022 and 2024 involving 1,418 patients. QoR was evaluated using either the QoR-15 (10 studies) or QoR-40 (3 studies) questionnaire. The pooled results indicated no significant difference in the QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference: 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: − 0.20, 0.23, P = 0.88, I2 = 73%) and PODs 2–3 between remimazolam and propofol. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in QoR dimensions, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and time to extubation as well as in the risks of agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients administered remimazolam exhibited slower anesthetic induction (mean difference (MD): 32.27 s) but faster recovery of consciousness (MD: − 1.60 min) than those administered propofol. Moreover, remimazolam was associated with a lower risk of rescue analgesia requirement in the PACU (risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.89, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%) but not in the ward.ConclusionRemimazolam is a potential alternative to propofol for general anesthesia as it offers similar QoR to the latter and has advantages in terms of consciousness recovery and immediate postoperative analgesia requirement.

Impact of propofol versus desflurane anesthesia on postoperative hepatic and renal functions in infants with living-related liver transplantation: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe effects of anesthetics on liver and kidney functions after infantile living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or desflurane-based inhalation anesthesia on postoperative liver and kidney functions in infant recipients after LRLT and to evaluate hepatic ischemia–reperfusion injury (HIRI).MethodsSeventy-six infants with congenital biliary atresia scheduled for LRLT were randomly divided into two anesthesia maintenance groups: group D with continuous inhalation of desflurane and group P with an infusion of propofol. The primary focus was to assess alterations of liver transaminase and serum creatinine (Scr) levels within the first 7 days after surgery. And the peak aminotransferase level within 72 h post-surgery was used as a surrogate marker for HIRI.ResultsThere were no differences in preoperative hepatic and renal functions between the two groups. Upon the intensive care unit (ICU) arrival, the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST, P = 0.001) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT, P = 0.005) in group P were significantly lower than those in group D. These changes persisted until the fourth and sixth days after surgery. The peak AST and ALT levels within 72 h after surgery were also lower in group P than in group D (856 (552, 1221) vs. 1468 (732, 1969) U/L, P = 0.001 (95% CI: 161–777) and 517 (428, 704) vs. 730 (541, 1100) U/L, P = 0.006, (95% CI: 58–366), respectively). Patients in group P had lower levels of Scr upon the ICU arrival and on the first day after surgery, compared to group D (17.8 (15.2, 22.0) vs. 23.0 (20.8, 30.8) μmol/L, P < 0.001 (95% CI: 3.0–8.7) and 17.1 (14.9, 21.0) vs. 20.5 (16.5, 25.3) μmol/L, P = 0.02 (95% CI: 0.0–5.0) respectively). Moreover, the incidence of severe acute kidney injury was significantly lower in group P compared to that in group D (15.8% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.038).ConclusionsPropofol-based TIVA might improve liver and kidney functions after LRLT in infants and reduce the incidence of serious complications, which may be related to the reduction of HIRI. However, further biomarkers will be necessary to prove these associations.

The synergistic mechanisms of propofol with cisplatin or doxorubicin in human ovarian cancer cells

BackgroundMost ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to poor outcomes and a relatively low 5-year survival rate. While tumor resection in the early stages can be highly effective, recurrence following primary treatment remains a significant cause of mortality. Propofol is a commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent in cancer resection surgery. Previous research has shown that propofol anesthesia was associated with improved survival in patients undergoing elective surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer. However, the underlying antitumor mechanisms are not yet fully understood.MethodsThis study aimed to uncover the antitumor properties of propofol alone and combined with cisplatin or doxorubicin, in human SKOV3 and OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells. We applied flowcytometry analysis for mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis, and autophagy, colony formation, migration, and western blotting analysis.ResultsGiven that chemotherapy is a primary clinical approach for managing advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer, it is essential to address the limitations of current chemotherapy, particularly in the use of cisplatin and doxorubicin, which are often constrained by their side effects and the development of resistance. First of all, propofol acted synergistically with cisplatin and doxorubicin in SKOV3 cells. Moreover, our data further showed that propofol suppressed colony formation, disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential, and induced apoptosis and autophagy in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cells. Finally, the effects of combined propofol with cisplatin or doxorubicin on mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis, autophagy, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition were different in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cells, depending on the p53 status.ConclusionIn summary, repurposing propofol could provide novel insights into the existing chemotherapy strategies for ovarian cancer. It holds promise for overcoming resistance to cisplatin or doxorubicin and may potentially reduce the required chemotherapy dosages and associated side effects, thus improving treatment outcomes.

COMPARISON OF TOPICAL AND INTRAVENOUS LIGNOCAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION UNDER PROPOFOL: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion is a common technique used in general anesthesia, but it may induce airway reflexes such as coughing, gagging, and laryngospasm. Lignocaine, whether administered topically or intravenously, is often used to suppress these reflexes. However, the comparative efficacy of these two routes remains unclear. Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of topical versus intravenous lignocaine in facilitating LMA insertion and minimizing airway complications in patients undergoing propofol anesthesia. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 62 patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia at a tertiary care hospital. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A (n = 31) received 40 mg of topical lignocaine aerosol, while Group B (n = 31) received intravenous lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg. Both groups were induced with propofol (2 mg/kg) prior to LMA insertion. Primary outcomes included the number of LMA insertion attempts, airway responses (coughing, gagging, laryngospasm), and hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate) recorded at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 minutes post-insertion. Results: LMA insertion on the first attempt was successful in 93.5% of patients in the topical lignocaine group compared to 74.2% in the intravenous group (p = 0.03). Airway reflexes were significantly lower in the topical group, with coughing, gagging, and laryngospasm rates of 6.5%, 16.1%, and 9.7%, respectively, compared to 32.3%, 45.2%, and 29.0% in the intravenous group (p &lt; 0.05). Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, showed no significant differences between the two groups at baseline or post-insertion. Conclusion: Topical lignocaine significantly improves conditions for LMA insertion compared to intravenous lignocaine, resulting in fewer airway complications while maintaining similar hemodynamic stability. Therefore, topical lignocaine is recommended for optimizing LMA insertion during propofol anesthesia.

Relationships between the qNOX, qCON, burst suppression ratio, and muscle activity index of the CONOX monitor during total intravenous anesthesia: a pilot study.

Processed electroencephalographic (EEG) indices can help to navigate general anesthesia. The CONOX (Fresenius Kabi) calculates two indices, the qCON (hypnotic level) and the qNOX (nociception). The CONOX also calculates indices for electromyographic (EMG) activity and EEG burst suppression (BSR). Because all EEG parameters seem to influence each other, our goal was a detailed description of parameter relationships. We used qCON, qNOX, EMG, and BSR information from 14 patients receiving propofol anesthesia. We described index relationships with linear models, heat maps, and box plot representations. We also evaluated associations between qCON/qNOX and propofol/remifentanil effect site concentrations (ceP/ceR). qNOX and qCON (qCON = 0.79*qNOX + 5.8; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.84) had a strong linear association. We further confirmed the strong relationship between qCON/qNOX and BSR for qCON/qNOX < 25: qCON=-0.19*BSR + 25.6 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.72); qNOX=-0.20*BSR + 26.2 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.72). The relationship between qCON and EMG was strong at higher indices: qCON = 0.55*EMG + 33.0 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.68). There was no qCON > 80 without EMG > 0. The relationship between ceP and qCON was qCON=-3.8*ceP + 70.6 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.11). The heat maps also suggest that the qCON and qNOX can at least partially separate the hypnotic and analgetic components of anesthesia. We could describe relationships between qCON, qNOX, EMG, BSR, ceP, and ceR, which may help the anaesthesiologist better interpret the information provided. One major finding is the dependence of qCON > 80 on EMG activity. This may limit the possibility of detecting wakefulness in the absence of EMG. Further, qNOX seems generally higher than qCON, but high opioid doses may lead to higher qCON than qNOX indices.

Efficacy and safety of esketamine versus propofol in electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, non-inferiority trial

BackgroundElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a commonly used alternative for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although esketamine has a rapid pharmacological antidepressant action, it has not been studied as an ECT anesthetic. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of esketamine with propofol when both are used as ECT anesthetic agents. MethodsForty patients with TRD were assigned to one of two arms in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial: esketamine or propofol anesthesia for a series of eight ECT sessions. Using a non-inferiority design, the primary outcome was the reduction in HAMD-17 depressive symptoms. The other outcomes were: rates of response and remission, anxiety, suicidal ideation, cognitive function, and adverse events. These were compared in an intention-to-treat analysis. ResultsEsketamine-ECT was non-inferior to propofol-ECT for reducing TRD symptoms after 8 sessions (adjusted Δ = 2.0, 95 % CI: −1.2–5.1). Compared to propofol-ECT, esketamine-ECT also had higher depression response (80 % vs. 70 %; p = .06) and remission (65 % vs. 55 %; p = .11) rates but non-inferiority was not established. In four components of cognitive function (speed of processing, working memory, visual learning, and verbal learning) esketamine-ECT was non-inferior to propofol-ECT. The results for anxiety, suicidal ideation, and adverse events (all p's > .05) were inconclusive. ConclusionEsketamine was non-inferior to propofol when both are used as anesthetics for TRD patients undergoing ECT. Replication studies with larger samples are needed to examine the inconclusive results. Registration numberChiCTR2000033715.

Effectiveness of Remimazolam Benzenesulfonate Combined with Alfentanil in Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroenteroscopy

Objective: To observe the effects of remimazolam benzenesulfonate combined with alfentanil during painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients. Methods: This study analyzes patients aged 60–85 years old undergoing painless gastroenteroscopy. A total of 140 patients, examined between February 2023 and February 2024, voluntarily participated and were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. The control group received alfentanil combined with propofol for anesthesia, while the experimental group received alfentanil combined with remimazolam benzenesulfonate. The relevant indices of both groups were separately analyzed. Results: Patients in the experimental group had a shorter awakening time, a faster discharge rate (P &lt; 0.05), and a shorter examination duration; however, the difference in examination time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P &gt; 0.05). Before anesthesia, there was no significant difference in the basic information and vital signs of the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Two minutes after anesthesia, both groups showed a decline in vital signs, but the vital signs of the experimental group remained more stable after the procedure, with the group’s indices showing improvement over the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was lower than in the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: In painless gastroenteroscopy for elderly patients, anesthesia using a combination of remimazolam benzenesulfonate and alfentanil improves anesthesia effectiveness, hastens patient recovery, enhances the stability of vital signs, and effectively controls adverse reactions, thereby improving patient comfort.