Prophylaxis Of Menstrual Migraine Research Articles

A review of frovatriptan for the treatment of menstrual migraine.

The objective of this review is to provide an overview of menstrual migraine (MM) and of frovatriptan and to assess clinical trial data regarding the efficacy and safety of frovatriptan for the acute and short-term prophylaxis of MM. Randomized controlled trials comparing frovatriptan with placebo or a triptan comparator for the acute or prophylactic treatment of MM were selected for review. MM affects up to 60% of women with migraine. Compared with attacks at other times of the cycle, menstrual attacks are longer, more severe, less responsive to treatment, more likely to relapse, and more disabling than attacks at other times of the cycle. No drugs are licensed for acute treatment of MM; triptans are recommended for treatment of moderate to severe attacks for menstrual and nonmenstrual attacks. Perimenstrual prophylaxis is indicated for patients with predictable MM that does not respond to symptomatic treatment alone. Treatment is unlicensed, but options include triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and hormone manipulation. Frovatriptan is distinctive from other triptans due to its long elimination half-life of 26 hours, which confers a longer duration of action. Post hoc analyses from randomized trials of MM show similar pain relief and pain-free rates for frovatriptan compared with other triptans (2 hours pain-free: relative risk [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.76) but significantly lower relapse rates (24 hours sustained pain-free: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.62). Data from randomized controlled trials show a significant reduction in risk of MM in women using frovatriptan 2.5 mg once daily (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31–1.86) or twice daily (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68–2.34) for perimenstrual prophylaxis compared with placebo. The twice daily dosing was more effective than once daily (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11–1.46). These findings support the use of frovatriptan as a first-line acute treatment for MM and for perimenstrual prophylaxis.

A review of the use of frovatriptan in the treatment of menstrually related migraine

Menstrual migraine (MM) is a highly prevalent condition associated with considerable disability. Migraine attacks occur exclusively around the menstrual period in approximately 10% of women with migraine, that is, pure menstrual migraine, while at least 50% of them also experience migraine at other times of the month, that is, menstrually related migraine (MRM). The therapeutic approach to patients with MRM is based on treatment of the attack, or prophylactic strategies. Triptans are recommended as first-line treatments for moderate to severe migraine attacks, including MM. Frovatriptan is one of the newest triptans. Its high affinity for 5-HT1B/1D receptors and long half-life contribute to its distinctive clinical effect, characterized by a more sustained and prolonged effect than other triptans. Indeed, frovatriptan proved to be effective in treating the acute attack, but was particularly effective in the short-term preventive therapy of MM. In addition, frovatriptan is one of the safest triptans, with the lowest risk of treatment-emergent adverse events. Following extensive evidence from randomized pharmacological trials, frovatriptan has now gained a grade A recommendation from the guidelines for short-term prophylaxis of MM. Recent post-hoc analyses of direct comparative trials also suggest that frovatriptan might have an important role in the acute treatment of MRM. In these studies, frovatriptan showed pain relief and pain-free rates similar to those of zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, and almotriptan, but with significantly lower recurrence rates. More well-designed, randomized, prospective studies, specifically enrolling women with MM, will be needed in the near future to confirm the efficacy of frovatriptan in this migraine subtype.

Neues bei Kopfschmerzen 2008

Chronic migraine without medication overuse is now widely accepted as a unique headache entity. Although the lifetime prevalence of migrainous vertigo is 1 %, it is most likely that most patients are not correctly diagnosed or treated. Further prospective studies have revealed triggers and premonitory symptoms signalling migraine attacks. Animal models of cortical spreading depression are being increasingly established to help understand migraine aura and headache. The combination of sumatriptan and naproxen is more effective in comparision to each of the substances alone. Recent trials have shown the efficiacy of topiramate in the treatment of medication overuse headache, chronic migraine and tension-type headache. There is further evidence for a cessation of migraine preventive therapy with topiramate after six months regarding a long-term benefit. However, there is no evidence from randomised trials for short-term prophylaxis of menstrual migraine with estrogen, NSAIDs or triptans. Venlaflaxine is effective for preventive therapy of chronic tension-type headache. Bilateral stimulation of the occipital nerve might be an option for patients suffering from refractory chronic cluster headache instead of deep brain stimulation. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction may represent a frequent cause of thunderclap headache.

Frovatriptan review

Frovatriptan belongs to the triptan compounds used for the acute treatment of migraine. Its affinity for the migraine-specific serotonin 5HT1B-receptors is highest in the class. Its long half-life in plasma (26 h) and metabolism by multiple pathways are unique characteristics among the triptans. These features can translate into long duration of action and low risk of interactions with other drugs. Frovatriptan has been effective and well tolerated over a wide range of doses in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled acute migraine trials and long-term, open-label trials. The 2.5-mg dose is recommended for both efficacy and a favourable side effect profile for acute migraine treatment. Frovatriptan has the lowest headache recurrence rate of all the triptans. Frovatriptan was better tolerated than sumatriptan in a head-to-head comparison study. Frovatriptan could make its mark especially in slowly progressing migraine attacks and in attacks that are highly predictable. For example, for the short-term prophylaxis of menstrual migraine, frovatriptan is the triptan of first choice.

Digest

Digest

Advanced strategies of short-term prophylaxis in menstrual migraine: state of the art and prospects

Patients suffering from menstrual migraine (MM) may be ideal candidates for an intermittent prophylaxis, usually termed short-term or mini-prophylaxis. It covers the whole period of vulnerability, e. g., the perimenstrual period, starting some days before the expected onset of MM attack. Theoretically MM attacks are an optimal target for drugs specifically developed for acute head pain. Unfortunately, due to their particular tendency to be longer, more intense and less responsive to analgesics, symptomatic approaches alone are not often able to completely control pain and its correlates. Many drugs have been proposed for short-term prophylaxis of MM. In this paper we analyse only non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, coxibs and triptans (especially those with longer half-life, naratriptan and frovatriptan). Moreover, MM can be prevented by a variety of hormonal manipulations, including oral contraceptives, which may be administered with an extended-dosing strategy; oestrogen replacement therapy; antioestrogen agents (danazol, tamoxifen); gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists followed by oestrogen add-back therapy. Finally, the use of some products, such as magnesium and phytoestrogens, that probably meet the requirements of those patients that appreciate a more "natural" approach, is discussed.

Prophylaxis of menstrual migraine with triptans: problems and possibilities.

Menstruation is a prominent, predictable attack trigger for many women with migraine. If abortive therapy of menstrual attacks is ineffective, prophylactic therapy is used to prevent attacks or render them shorter and less resistant to acute therapy. Interest is increasing in the use of triptan medications for the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine, and clinical trials to evaluate this approach are underway. Potential problems with triptan prophylaxis of menstrual migraine that deserve attention include the lack of consensus on the definition of menstrual migraine and the difficulty in making a reliable diagnosis of the disorder. Unconvincing demonstrations of efficacy and unresolved cost and safety concerns should temper enthusiasm for their use in this manner. Further studies, using a consistent definition of menstrual association and employing diary validation of the diagnosis, are needed to determine the efficacy of the triptans in women who consistently experience migraine attacks associated with menstruation. Triptans would have to show compelling advantages over other therapy to be a plausible prophylactic treatment for menstrual migraine.

Naproxen Sodium in Menstrual Migraine Prophylaxis: A Double‐Blind Placebo Controlled Study

In this study, the efficacy of Naproxen sodium (Nxs) in the prophylaxis of Menstrual Migraine (MM) was tested, versus Placebo (PL). Forty women suffering from MM were admitted to a double-blind treatment protocol with Nxs 550 mg twice each day by mouth or Placebo (PL), for 3 months; in the next 3 months all the women were treated with the active drug in an open study. The headache intensity and duration, as well as the number of days of headache and the analgesic consumption, were significantly reduced with Nxs compared to PL. The efficacy of Nxs, shown also in improving premenstrual pain, and its good tolerability, support the use of this drug in the prophylactic therapy of MM.

Estrogen-withdrawal migraine. II. Attempted prophylaxis by continuous estradiol administration.

Prophylaxis of menstrual migraine was attempted in five women, using estradiol implants. The treatment was successful in suppressing ovulation and in producing high, although fluctuating, levels of estradiol in the plasma. Clinically this was associated with severe menstrual disturbance. The regular periodicity of the headaches was lost, but clinical benefit was unpredictable, with some patients actually experiencing more headaches than before the treatment. The administration of progesterone against a background of prolonged exposure to high estrogen levels did not provoke migraine, nor in any case did its subsequent withdrawal result in migraine. These findings cast further doubt on the importance of progesterone withdrawal in the etiology of menstrual migraine.