Prophylactic Antiviral Therapy Research Articles

Immunomonitoring via ELISPOT Assay Reveals Attenuated T-Cell Immunity to CMV in Immunocompromised Liver-Transplant Patients.

Assessing immune responses to cytomegalovirus (CMV) after liver transplant in patients on immunosuppressive therapy remains challenging. In this study, employing ELISPOT assays, 52 liver-transplant recipients were evaluated for antiviral T-cell activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), measuring interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion upon stimulation with CMV-specific peptides (CMV peptide pool, CMV IE-1, and pp65 antigens). Parameters such as stimulation index, mean spot size, and mean spot count were measured. The study found that heightened immunosuppression, especially with prednisolone in triple therapy, significantly dampened CMV-specific immune responses. This was demonstrated by decreased IFN-γ production by CMV-specific T-cells (CMV peptide pool: p = 0.036; OR = 0.065 [95% CI: 0.005-0.840], pp65 antigen: p = 0.026; OR = 0.048 [95% CI: 0.003-0.699]). Increased immunosuppression correlated with reduced IFN-γ secretion per cell, reflected in smaller mean spot sizes for the CMV peptide pool (p = 0.019). Notably, shorter post-transplant intervals correlated with diminished antiviral T-cell IFN-γ release at two years (CMV peptide pool: p = 0.019; IE antigen: p = 0.010) and five years (CMV peptide pool: p = 0.0001; IE antigen: p = 0.002; pp65 antigen: p = 0.047), as did advancing age (pp65 antigen: p = 0.016, OR = 0.932, 95% CI: 0.881-0.987). Patients with undetectable CMV antigens had a notably higher risk of CMV reactivation within six months from blood collection, closely linked with triple immunosuppression and prednisolone use. These findings highlight the intricate interplay between immunosuppression, immune response dynamics, and CMV reactivation risk, emphasizing the necessity for tailored immunosuppressive strategies to mitigate CMV reactivation in liver-transplant recipients. It can be concluded that, particularly in the early months post-transplantation, the use of prednisolone as a third immunosuppressant should be critically reconsidered. Additionally, the use of prophylactic antiviral therapy effective against CMV in this context holds significant importance.

Overview of the immunological mechanisms in hepatitis B virus reactivation: Implications for disease progression and management strategies

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a clinically significant challenge in disease management. This review explores the immunological mechanisms underlying HBV reactivation, emphasizing disease progression and management. It delves into host immune responses and reactivation’s delicate balance, spanning innate and adaptive immunity. Viral factors’ disruption of this balance, as are interactions between viral antigens, immune cells, cytokine networks, and immune checkpoint pathways, are examined. Notably, the roles of T cells, natural killer cells, and antigen-presenting cells are discussed, highlighting their influence on disease progression. HBV reactivation’s impact on disease severity, hepatic flares, liver fibrosis progression, and hepatocellular carcinoma is detailed. Management strategies, including anti-viral and immunomodulatory approaches, are critically analyzed. The role of prophylactic anti-viral therapy during immunosuppressive treatments is explored alongside novel immunotherapeutic interventions to restore immune control and prevent reactivation. In conclusion, this comprehensive review furnishes a holistic view of the immunological mechanisms that propel HBV reactivation. With a dedicated focus on understanding its implications for disease progression and the prospects of efficient management strategies, this article contributes significantly to the knowledge base. The more profound insights into the intricate interactions between viral elements and the immune system will inform evidence-based approaches, ultimately enhancing disease management and elevating patient outcomes. The dynamic landscape of management strategies is critically scrutinized, spanning anti-viral and immunomodulatory approaches. The role of prophylactic anti-viral therapy in preventing reactivation during immunosuppressive treatments and the potential of innovative immunotherapeutic interventions to restore immune control and proactively deter reactivation.

Prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hematological malignancies in the targeted therapy era.

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be serious and potentially fatal, but is preventable. HBV reactivation is most commonly reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, especially rituximab-containing therapy for hematological malignancies and those receiving stem cell transplantation. Patients with inactive and even resolved HBV infection still have persistence of HBV genomes in the liver. The expression of these silent genomes is controlled by the immune system. Suppression or ablation of immune cells, most importantly B cells, may lead to reactivation of seemingly resolved HBV infection. Thus, all patients with hematological malignancies receiving anticancer therapy should be screened for active or resolved HBV infection by blood tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Patients found to be positive for HBsAg should be given prophylactic antiviral therapy. For patients with resolved HBV infection, there are two approaches. The first is pre-emptive therapy guided by serial HBV DNA monitoring, and treatment with antiviral therapy as soon as HBV DNA becomes detectable. The second approach is prophylactic antiviral therapy, particularly for patients receiving high-risk therapy, especially anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Entecavir and tenofovir are the preferred antiviral choices. Many new effective therapies for hematological malignancies have been introduced in the past decade, for example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, novel monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibody drug conjugates, and small molecule inhibitors, which may be associated with HBV reactivation. Although there is limited evidence to guide the optimal preventive measures, we recommend antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-positive patients receiving novel treatments, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the risk of HBV reactivation with these agents and the best prophylactic strategy.

Management of chronic myelogenous leukemia with COVID-19 and hepatitis B.

The application of immunosuppressive agents and targeted drugs has opened a novel approach for the treatment of hematological tumors, and the application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia is one of the landmark breakthroughs that has considerably improved the prognosis of CML patients. However, with the extensive use of TKI, the co-infection of CML patients has become increasingly apparent, especially regarding infectious diseases such as hepatitis B and COVID-19. The underlying mechanism may be related to the inhibition of the immune function by TKI. Poor management, including disease progression due to the infectious disease or TKI dose reduction or discontinuation, may lead to adverse clinical outcomes and can even be life-threatening. Therefore, this review principally provides an overview of the pathogenesis and standardized management principles of CML patients with comorbid COVID-19 or hepatitis B in order to improve clinicians' awareness of the risks so as to more effectively diagnose and treat CML and improve the survival rate and quality of life of patients. In the past two decades, owing to the advent of imatinib, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has transformed into a chronic controllable disease, and even treatment-free remission can be anticipated. Earlier studies have indicated that tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) exerts a peculiar inhibitory effect on the body's immune function. Therefore, with the widespread application of TKI, more and more attention has been paid to the comorbidity of infectious diseases in CML patients, especially in patients with progressive disease or non-remission. Despite some studies revealing that the proportion and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in CML patients receiving TKI treatment are lower than in patients with other hematological malignancies, CML patients with stable disease are still recommended to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, while TKI may or may not be discontinued. Meanwhile, the management of CML patients during the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still necessitates further discussion. This article also provides an overview of TKI-related hepatitis B reactivation. If not managed, patients may face adverse consequences such as hepatitis B reactivation-related hepatitis, liver failure, and progression of CML after forced withdrawal of medication. Therefore, this review aimed to comprehensively describe the management of CML patients with comorbid COVID-19, the pathogenesis of hepatitis B reactivation, the indicated population for prophylactic antiviral therapy, the time of antiviral drug discontinuation, and drug selection.

A Role for Isoniazid Prophylaxis Against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis During Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia in Highly Endemic Areas?

Hematological malignancy is an increasing burden on the Tanzanian healthcare system accounting for around 10% of all cancer diagnosis [1]. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is particularly challenging in the context of limited diagnostic services, restricted blood product availability, high cost of chemotherapy drugs and the complete absence of bone marrow transplantation. Despite this Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) has attempted to overcome these barriers and has commenced induction therapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine in a number of suitable candidates in an attempt to treat their disease. However, to date treatment during nadir poses an unresolved threat despite the use of prophylactic antiviral, anti-fungal and antibiotic therapies and broad-spectrum antibiotics in the case of infection.

HBV reactivation and its effect on survival in HBV-related hepatocarcinoma patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus immune checkpoint inhibitors.

This study aimed to access hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and its effect on survival in HBV-related hepatocarcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this single-center retrospective study, we enrolled 119 HBV-related unresectable advanced HCC patients receiving TACE combined with TKIs plus ICIs. Risk factors for HBV reactivation were analyzed by logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to draw the survival curve, and log-rank test was used to compare survival between patients with and without HBV reactivation. A total of 12 patients (10.1%) encountered HBV reactivation in our study, of which only 4 patients received antiviral prophylaxis. The incidence of HBV reactivation was 1.8% (1/57) in patients with detectable baseline HBV DNA and 4.2% (4/95) in patients with antiviral prophylaxis respectively. Lack of prophylactic antiviral treatment (OR=0.047, 95%CI 0.008-0.273, P=0.001) and undetectable HBV DNA (OR=0.073, 95%CI 0.007-0.727, P=0.026) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. The median survival time (MST) for all patients was 22.4 months. No survival difference was observed in patients with or without HBV reactivation. (MST: undefined vs 22.4 months, log-rank test: P=0.614). HBV reactivation could occur in HBV-related HCC patients who treated with TACE in combination with TKIs plus ICIs. Before and during the combination treatment, it is necessary to routinely monitor HBV DNA and to take effective prophylactic antiviral therapy.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation during immunosuppressive treatment.

In this study, we aimed to rate Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation, risk factors for reactivation and compare the efficacy of prophylactic antiviral therapy in patients who initiated immunosuppressive therapy. A total of 177 patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or resolved HBV infection who had received immunosuppressive treatment were analyzed in this retrospective study. Demographic features, relevant liver tests, prophylactic treatment type, duration of treatment, transaminase levels and HBV serology and clinical conditions were recorded from all patients who received prophylactic treatment. Eleven reactivation occurred in all groups. The mean age of patients who developed reactivation was statistically significantly lower (p=0.049). Three (27.3%) of the patients were male and 8 (72.7%) were female (p=0.66). Eight (36.36%) of 22 HB surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients developed reactivation, 3 (155%) of 155 HBsAg negative patients developed reactivation. HBsAg positivity was determined as a risk factor for reactivation (p<0.001). There was no significant difference neither in reactivation, nor in the type of antiviral treatment (p=0.2) according to anti-HBs serology (p=0.366). As a result, early age, baseline HBsAg positivity, moderate risk group, baseline HBV DNA positivity were associated with reactivation. Gender, immunosuppressive therapy type, preemptive antiviral therapy type, and anti-HBs titers were not associated with reactivation.

Antiviral therapy defiant mixed viral retinitis post hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is an uncommon presentation post allogeneic transplant and can be vision-threatening. Our case demonstrates the occurrence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) proven mixed viral retinitis (cytomegalovirus and varicella zoster virus) post allogeneic stem cell transplant despite multiple prophylactic antiviral therapies, including letermovir, and in the documented absence of CMV DNAemia. A 21-year-old female with acute myeloid leukemia presented with mixed viral retinitis (cytomegalovirus and varicella zoster virus) post allogenic transplant. This presentation occurred despite ongoing standard prophylaxis for both of these viruses, as well as following two courses of treatment for CMV viremia, with a documented negative CMV PCR in the blood prior to the presentation with retinitis. The patient was treated with intravenous ganciclovir and subsequently transitioned to oral valganciclovir with durable resolution of the retinitis. We report a rare case of mixed viral retinitis occurring despite multiple antiviral prophylaxes including letermovir and with PCR-documented absence of preceding CMV viremia, in a post-allogeneic stem cell transplant patient, with PCR of the aqueous fluid demonstrating two viral populations. With very little existing literature on either mixed viral retinitis or CMV retinitis during letermovir prophylaxis, this case expands the literature on both topics. CMV retinitis is an uncommon potentially vision threatening presentation post hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and can occur due to early CMV reactivation, low CD4 count, and delayed CD4 lymphocyte recovery. Letermovir has poor CNS and retinal penetration. This case highlights the need for more research on secondary prophylaxis with letermovir.

HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) predicts a high risk of hepatitis B reactivation in patients with B-cell lymphoma receiving rituximab based immunochemotherapy.

Patterns of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV-R) in HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving rituximab based immunochemotherapy have not been well described. The retrospective study included 222 HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) NHL patients as training cohort and 127 cases as validation cohort. The incidence of HBV-R in HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) B-cell NHL patients was 6.3% (14/222), of which that in HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) population was 23.7% (9/38). Multivariate analysis showed that HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) correlated with a high risk of HBV-R in B-cell lymphoma patients (training phase hazard ratio[HR], 10.123; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.389-30.239; p < 0.001; validation phase HR, 18.619; 95% CI, 1.684-205.906; p = 0.017; combined HR, 12.264; 95% CI, 4.529-33.207; p < 0.001). Inthetrainingcohort,the mortality rate of HBsAg (-)/HBcAb (+) B-cell NHL caused by HBV-R was 14.3% (2/14) while that for HBV reactivated HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+)/HBcAb (+) population was up to 44.4% (4/9). As a high incidence of HBV-R and high mortality after HBV-R was found in HBsAg (-)/HBsAb (-)/HBcAb (+)/HBeAg (-)/HBeAb (+) patients with B-cell NHL receiving rituximab based immunochemotherapy, prophylactic antiviral therapy is recommended for these patients.

442 - Outcomes of CMV Infection in the Setting of Gastrointestinal Graft Vs. Host Disease in the Era of Pre-Emptive and Prophylactic Antiviral Therapy

442 - Outcomes of CMV Infection in the Setting of Gastrointestinal Graft Vs. Host Disease in the Era of Pre-Emptive and Prophylactic Antiviral Therapy

Effect of infection with hepatitis B virus on the survival outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the prophylactic antiviral era.

Patients with lymphoma who are also infected with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) have a poor prognosis. This could be partly explained by the delay or premature termination of anti-tumor treatment because of HBV reactivation. However, there is limited data on the survival outcome of patients HBV-related lymphoma in the era of prophylactic antivirals. Data for 128 patients with HBV surface antigen-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was collected. The median age was 54 years and the ratio of men to women was 1.2:1. All patients received immune-chemotherapy and prophylactic antiviral therapy. The median number of cycles of immune-chemotherapy was six. The overall response rate was 82%, with a complete remission rate of 75%. With a median follow-up of 58.4 months, the 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 75.7% and 74.7%, respectively. Nine patients experienced HBV reactivation but none experienced HBV-associated hepatitis. Patients with low and high HBV DNA loads had comparable survival outcomes. In conclusion, HBV infection had no negative effect on the prognosis of DLBCL in the era of prophylactic antiviral therapy.

Meta-analysis: hepatitis B reactivation in patients receiving biological therapy.

The use of biologics poses a moderate to high risk for hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) in chronic carriers. To determine the prevalence of HBVr with TNF alpha inhibitors, ustekinumab and vedolizumab METHOD: We followed the MOOSE guidelines and conducted a comprehensive literature search. We conducted a systematic search of EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid) and PubMed. The studies included patients who were chronic and occult HBV carriers with various rheumatological, dermatological or gastroenterological conditions. We used a random effects model using pooled estimates (prevalence of HBVr with 95% confidence intervals (CI)). We included 29 studies with 1409 patients infected with HBV. The prevalence of HBVr in chronic carriers of HBV was 17.1% (95% CI: 7.0-35.9, n= 5), 16.6% (95% CI: 9.5-27.5%, n= 6), 40.5% (95% CI: 20.3-64.5%, n= 4) and 19.1% (95% CI: 7.3-41.2%, n= 2), respectively, for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab. The respective prevalence for reactivation in patients with occult HBV infection was 5.0% (95% CI: 2.8-8.7%, number of studies: n= 18), 2.6% (95% CI: 1.4-4.7%, n= 18), 4.4% (95% CI: 2.2-8.7%, n= 12) and 6.4% (95% CI: 2.2-16.8, n= 5). There were 39 HBVr (26 in chronic HBV and 13 in the occult group) without any hepatic failure or death. In the chronic HBVr group, only three of 24 patients received antiviral prophylaxis. HBVr prevalence rates differ between the chronic carrier state and the occult carrier state. The uptake of prophylactic antiviral therapy in high-risk groups was low, contrary to clinical practice guidelines.

L-lysine: Its antagonism with L-arginine in controlling viral infection. Narrative literature review.

Knowledge about viral characteristics, mechanisms of entry into the host cell and multiplication/dissemination can help in the control and treatment of viral pathologies. Several nutritional factors linked to the host may favour viral multiplication and their control, may lead to new prophylactic alternatives and/or antiviral therapies. The objective of this review is to discuss the relationship between the amino acid L-lysine and the control of viral infections, aiming at a possible therapeutic property. This research used databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, Medline and Google Scholar, as well as searching for references cited by journals. The time frame covered the period between 1964 and January 2022. The observed studies have shown that the usual antiviral therapies are not able to interfere with the viruses in their latent state; however, they can interfere with the adhesion and fusion of viral particles or the production of proteins, which play an important role in viral epidemiology and control, particularly in the initial moment and in reactivation. Lysine is an amino acid that can interfere mainly in the formation of capsid proteins and DNA by a competitive antagonism with amino acid arginine, which is an essential amino acid for some viruses, and also by promoting the increase of arginase, increasing the catabolism of arginine. Although there is evidence of the importance of L-lysine in viral control, more studies are needed, with a view to new antiviral therapies.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibition: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been explored as first-line treatment in various types of previously untreatable malignancies, while limited evidence is available on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients undergoing immunotherapy. We systematically reviewed data concerning challenges of hepatic adverse events including HBV reactivation and hepatitis in patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing immunotherapy. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, web of science, Embase and Cochrane library up to May 31, 2022. Studies reporting the safety profile of ICIs in patients with HBV infection were eligible. Meta-analyses were conducted to generate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 13 studies including 2561 patients were included for meta-analysis. The overall incidence rates of HBV reactivation in patients with chronic HBV infection and past HBV infection were 1.0% (95% CI 0-3%) and 0% (95% CI 0-0%), respectively. Among patients with chronic HBV infection, the incidence rates of HBV reactivation were 1.0% (95% CI 0-2%) and 10.0% (95% CI 4-18%) for patients with and without antiviral prophylaxis, respectively. Patients with chronic HBV infection were at a higher risk of HBV reactivation compared with those with past HBV infection [OR = 8.69, 95% CI (2.16-34.99)]. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of HBV reactivation [OR = 0.12, 95% CI (0.02-0.67)] and HBV-associated hepatitis [OR = 0.05, 95% CI (0.01-0.28)] in patients with chronic HBV infection. Prophylactic antiviral therapy should be administered to patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing anticancer immunotherapy. Patients with past HBV infection are at lower risk of HBV reactivation compared with those with chronic HBV infection, they could be initiated with antiviral prophylaxis or monitored with the intent of on-demand antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis B Virus Infection Flare Induced Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 vaccination is essential for controlling the outbreak and preventing severe disease. However, there are still uncertainties about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in individuals with chronic liver disease. Case Presentation: Three patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection presented to our hospital with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) due to HBV flare after COVID-19 vaccination (mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19). Their COVID-19 antibodies were tested by Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay, which showed good response after full two-dose course of vaccine. One patient refused the test. The patients’ clinical conditions deteriorated during hospitalization. Patient 1 received Entecavir (Baraclude) 1 mg/day upon presentation, but the serum bilirubin level and international normalized ratio (INR) kept increasing. He was comatose in one week and underwent urgent living donor liver transplantation. Patient 2 was on regular Entecavir (Baraclude) 0.5 mg/day and was increased to 1 mg/day upon admission. The serum bilirubin level and INR kept increasing, and he developed grade 3 hepatic encephalopathy in three weeks. The patient then received urgent living donor liver transplantation. Patient 3 received Entecavir (Baraclude) 1 mg/day upon presentation. Her serum bilirubin and INR kept increasing, and her mental status altered in a week. She did not undergo liver transplantation for her old age. Conclusions: It is unclear whether there is a cause-and-effect relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and HBV infection flare. Furthermore, the mechanism of COVID-19 vaccine-induced HBV reactivation is not established. Further studies are needed in this regard. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, prophylactic antiviral therapy for HBV infection before COVID-19 vaccination should be considered.

Hepatitis Virus Reactivation in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Secukinumab in a Real-World Setting of Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C Infection.

Background and ObjectiveBiologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapies, may reactivate hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, as well in inactive carriers or patients with occult infection. However, some biologics, including anti-interleukin-17 therapies such as secukinumab, seem to be less likely to cause hepatitis reactivation. This study assessed the safety of secukinumab treatment in patients with psoriasis with HBV or HBC infection.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with secukinumab at seven Italian centers. Patients serologically positive for one or more of the following viral hepatitis markers were included: HCV antibody (± HCV-RNA positivity) and/or hepatitis B surface antigen, and/or HBV core antibody and/or HBV surface antibody (± HBV-DNA positivity). Patients received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneously at week 0/1/2/3/4 then every 4 weeks; prophylactic therapy before starting secukinumab was prescribed where indicated. The primary study endpoint was the reactivation of hepatitis viral infection, defined as conversion to HBV-DNA or HCV-RNA positivity, with or without elevation of transaminases.ResultsSixty patients (17 with concomitant psoriatic arthritis) were included. Thirteen subjects were hepatitis B surface antigen positive, 19 were HBV core antibody positive, and 30 were positive for the HCV antibody; however, all were HCV-RNA negative. After 53.5 ± 37.5 weeks of secukinumab therapy, hepatitis reactivation occurred in only one patient, who had a reactivation of both hepatitis B and hepatitis C. This patient had not undergone hepatitis B prophylaxis or hepatitis C treatment before secukinumab.ConclusionsThese real-world data support the safety of secukinumab in patients with positive markers of HBV or HCV infection, when administered together with dedicated prophylaxis.

Effectiveness of prophylactic antiviral therapy in reducing HBV reactivation for HBsAg-positive recipients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multi-institutional experience from an HBV endemic area.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) is not uncommon in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients receiving allo-HSCT have a very high risk of HBVr. However, the validity of prophylactic antiviral treatment in HBsAg-positive allo-HSCT recipients has not been well studied. We aimed to add experience in dealing with HBsAg-positive patients following allo-HSCT. We conducted a cohort study that included 11 years of data of HBsAg-positive allo-HSCT patients in multiple centers. The cumulative incidence of HBVr with antiviral prophylaxis at 60 months following transplantation was 8.9%. Both lamivudine (LAM) and entecavir (ETV) effectively reduced the incidence of HBVr. Patients with absent-mild cGVHD had a lower HBVr rate than that of patients with moderate-severe cGVHD (HR = 0.201, P = 0.020). The incidence of HBsAg seroclearance at 60 months following transplantation was 34.3%. Recipients accepting from anti-HBs-negative donors were associated with a lower HBsAg seroclearance rate than that of those accepting from anti-HBs-positive donors (HR=0.255, P < 0.001). The peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donor source had a higher HBsAg seroclearance rates than that of the PBSC plus bone marrow stem cell source (HR = 4.700, P = 0.047). The prophylactic antiviral treatment effectively reduced HBVr in HBsAg-positive recipients receiving allo-HSCT. HBsAg-positive recipients accept anti-HBs-positive PBSC donor sources may facilitate the acquisition of HBsAg seroclearance after transplantation.

A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cmvpepvax for Preventing CMV Reactivation/Disease after Matched Related/Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cmvpepvax for Preventing CMV Reactivation/Disease after Matched Related/Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Hepatotoxicity associated with PD-1 blockade antibodies in cancer patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus.

The use of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies in treating malignancies is increasing; however, most registered clinical trials on anti-PD-1 antibodies exclude patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). This retrospective study aimed to assess hepatotoxicity in cancer patients infected with HBV undergoing anti-PD1 antibody therapy and identify the associated risk factors. A total of 301 cancer patients positive for hepatitis B core antibodies (HbcAb) (negative or positive hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) who received PD-1 inhibitors were enrolled. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence rate of hepatotoxicity related to PD-1 inhibitor treatment, and risk factors associated with hepatic toxicity, respectively. Of the enrolled analyzed, 16.9% (n = 51) developed any grade and 4.7% (n = 14) developed grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity, respectively. Higher risk for any-grade hepatotoxicity development was associated with sero-positive HBsAg (OR = 6.30; P = 0.020), existence of liver involvement (OR = 2.10; P = 0.030), and detectable baseline HBV DNA levels (OR = 2.39; P = 0.012). Patients with prophylactic antiviral therapy decreased hazard for the incidence of grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.10; P = 0.016). Our results suggested chronic (HBsAg-positive)/resolved (HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive) HBV-infected cancer patients are at an increased risk of hepatotoxicity following PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Cancer patients should be tested for HBsAg/HBcAb prior to the commencement of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. For patients with chronic/resolved HBV infection, ALT/AST and HBV DNA should be closely monitored during the whole immunotherapy period.

Infectious keratitis after corneal crosslinking: systematic review.

Corneal crosslinking is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration--approved therapy to stiffen the cornea and prevent progression of corneal ectasia in patients with keratoconus. The standard procedure involves removal of the corneal epithelium (epithelial-off) prior to treatment. Variations to the standard procedure include accelerated crosslinking and transepithelial procedures. This study reviewed what is known regarding the risk for infection after epithelial-off crosslinking, the spectrum of pathogens, and clinical outcomes. 26 publications were identified. All eyes were fit with a bandage contact lens postoperatively. Available data indicate that the overall frequency of infectious keratitis after epithelium-off crosslinking is low. Bacterial infections are the most common, with a mean time of presentation of 4.8 days postoperatively. The use of steroids and bandage contact lenses in the immediate postoperative period and/or a history of atopic or herpetic disease were associated with infection. These patients require intense postoperative care with prophylactic antiviral therapy when appropriate.