Prone Breast Research Articles

Study protocol: Optimising patient positioning for the planning of accelerated partial breast radiotherapy for the integrated magnetic resonance linear accelerator: OPRAH MRL

BackgroundAccelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an accepted treatment option for early breast cancer. Treatment delivered on the Magnetic Resonance integrated Linear Accelerator (MRL) provides the added assurance of improved soft tissue visibility, important in the delivery of APBI. This technique can be delivered in both the supine and prone positions, however current literature suggests that prone treatment on the MRL is infeasible due to physical limitations with bore size. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of positioning patients on a custom designed prone breast board compared with supine positioning on a personalised vacuum bag. Geometric distortion, the relative position of Organs at Risk (OAR) to the tumour bed and breathing motion (intrafraction motion) will be compared between the supine and prone positions. The study will also investigate the positional impact on dosimetry, patient experience, and position preference.MethodsUp to 30 patients will be recruited over a 12-month period for participation in this Human Research Ethics Committee approved exploratory cohort study. Patients will be scanned on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Simulator in both the supine and prone positions as per current standard of care for APBI simulation. Supine and prone positioning comparisons will all be assessed on de-identified MRI image pairs, acquired using appropriate software. Patient experience will be explored through completion of a short, anonymous electronic survey. Descriptive statistics will be used for reporting of results with categorical, parametric/non-parametric tests applied (data format dependent). Survey results will be interpreted by comparison of percentage frequencies across the Likert scales. Thematic content analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data from the open-ended survey questions.DiscussionThe results of this study will be used to assess the feasibility of treating patients with APBI in the prone position on a custom designed board on the MRL. It may also be used to assist with identification of patients who would benefit from this position over supine without the need to perform both scans. Patient experience and technical considerations will be utilised to develop a tool to assist in this process.Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN1262400067583. Registered 28th of May 2024. https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624000679583.aspx

Hypofunction of macrophage chemotaxis contributes to defective efficacy of herceptin in HER2-positive breast cancer patients

ABSTRACT Breast cancer was considered as a kind of prone breast tumors with the complicated pathological mechanisms and diverse clinical classifications. In the clinical treatments of HER2-positive tumor patients, HER2 monoclonal antibodies, such as Herceptin, have shown well-defined therapeutic effects. Nevertheless, due to the heterogeneity of breast cancers, drug resistance inevitably appeared during the application of Herceptin. In order to fully understand the immune tolerance status of the tumor microenvironment in the population of sensitive and insensitive patients, this study carried out a series of studies through Luminex cytokines assay, clinicopathological analysis, immunofluorescence, and PCR. The results confirmed that in clinical samples sensitive to Herceptin, there were a large number of macrophages, and the protein expression levels and in situ expression of macrophage-related chemokines and inflammatory mediators are significantly higher than drug-resistant tumor samples. Further studies found that T cell function has a low correlation with tumor growth, and there are obvious obstacles in the process of peripheral blood immune cells entering the tumor microenvironment. In summary, this study provided clues for understanding the clinical drug resistance of HER2 monoclonal antibody and the clinical rational use of drugs and combination drugs.

Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

This study investigated the differences in target volumes between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRIpre) and postoperative MRI (MRIpost) for breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using deformable image registration (DIR). Seventeen eligible patients who underwent whole-breast irradiation in the prone position after BCS were enrolled. On MRIpre, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated as GTVpre, which was then expanded by 10 mm to represent the preoperative lumpectomy cavity (LC), denoted as LCpre. The LC was expanded to the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) on the MRIpre and MRIpost, denoted as CTVpre, CTVpost, PTVpre, and PTVpost, respectively. The MIM software system was used to register the MRIpre and MRIpost using DIR. Differences were evaluated regarding target volume, distance between the centers of mass (dCOM), conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI). The relationship between CILC /CIPTV and the clinical factors was also assessed. Significant differences were observed in LC and PTV volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost (p < 0.0001). LCpre was 0.85 cm3 larger than LCpost, while PTVpre was 29.38 cm3 smaller than PTVpost. The dCOM between LCpre and LCpost was 1.371 cm, while that between PTVpre and PTVpost reduced to 1.348 cm. There were statistically significant increases in CI and DI for LCpost-LCpre and PTVpost-PTVpre (CI = 0.221, 0.470; DI = 0.472, 0.635). No obvious linear correlations (p > 0.05) were found between CI and GTV, primary tumor volume-to-breast volume ratio, distance from the primary tumor to the nipple and chest wall, and body mass index. Despite using DIR technology, the spatial correspondence of target volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost was suboptimal. Therefore, relying solely on preoperative diagnostic MRI with DIR for postoperative LC delineation is not recommended.

Quantifying changes in shoulder orientation between the prone and supine positions from magnetic resonance imaging

BackgroundPredicting breast tissue motion using biomechanical models can provide navigational guidance during breast cancer treatment procedures. These models typically do not account for changes in posture between procedures. Difference in shoulder position can alter the shape of the pectoral muscles and breast. A greater understanding of the differences in the shoulder orientation between prone and supine could improve the accuracy of breast biomechanical models. Methods19 landmarks were placed on the sternum, clavicle, scapula, and humerus of the shoulder girdle in prone and supine breast MRIs (N = 10). These landmarks were used in an optimization framework to fit subject-specific skeletal models and compare joint angles of the shoulder girdle between these positions. FindingsThe mean Euclidean distance between joint locations from the fitted skeletal model and the manually identified joint locations was 15.7 mm ± 2.7 mm. Significant differences were observed between prone and supine. Compared to supine position, the shoulder girdle in the prone position had the lateral end of the clavicle in more anterior translation (i.e., scapula more protracted) (P < 0.05), the scapula in more protraction (P < 0.01), the scapula in more upward rotation (associated with humerus elevation) (P < 0.05); and the humerus more elevated (P < 0.05) for both the left and right sides. InterpretationShoulder girdle orientation was found to be different between prone and supine. These differences would affect the shape of multiple pectoral muscles, which would affect breast shape and the accuracy of biomechanical models.

3D Surface Imaging in Reducing Setup Error for Prone Whole Breast Radiotherapy

For patients undergoing whole breast radiotherapy, treatment in the prone position allows for reduced dose to critical organs such as the heart and lungs. However, this treatment position comes with greater challenges in reproducibility and setup error given the unstable position. Our objective was to investigate the benefit of using 3D surface imaging to reduce daily setup errors for these patients. We performed a retrospective review of consecutive breast patients receiving prone breast radiotherapy at our institution. All patients were positioned initially using setup tattoos and twice a week, the positioning was adjusted using the aid of a motion tracking system. Then, a daily kilovoltage (kV) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image was acquired and positioning was adjusted to setup the breast and chest wall. Shifts in each translational direction were recorded and the three-dimensional vector displacement was calculated. For each patient the average displacements on days where a motion tracking system was used were compared to days whereas motion tracking system was not used. Patients were classified into significant benefit (more than 4 mm improvement), small benefit (0-4 mm improvement) or increased error (increased shifts on days a motion tracking system was used). Patient demographics were collected including stage, BMI, weight, heigh, age, ethnicity. Comparisons were made using t-tests. A total of 40 patients with stage T0-2N0 breast cancer were included. The median age was 64 and 60% of patients had left sided breast cancer. A total of 665 daily CBCT scans were analyzed, and the median daily vector displacement was 7.2 mm (1-21 mm). The median displacement on treatments where a motion tracking system was used (41% of treatments) was 6.1 mm versus 8.1 mm when not used (p<.0001). The use of a motion tracking system significantly reduced the occurrence of shifts more than 1 cm (12% vs. 33%, p < .0001) and 5 mm (65% vs. 83% p < .0001). For individual patients, 28% showed a significant improvement, 55% showed small improvement, 17% showed increased error. The median BMI was 27, weight was 71 kg, and neither was associated with an improvement in the use of Align RT (p > .05). However, patients in the small improvement group had a higher BMI than patients in the other two groups 29 vs. 25 (p = .01). A similar association was seen for weight (p < .05). No association was found for the benefit of a motion tracking system for height, age, stage or ethnicity. The use of 3D surface imaging for breast cancer patients receiving prone whole breast radiotherapy on average significantly reduced setup errors. For patients with higher BMI there was a consistent small reduction in setup error when compared to using setup marks alone. For patients with lower BMI, caution should be exercised as there was more variation with some patients demonstrating a large benefit and other patients having an increased setup error with the use of surface imaging. Further research is needed to investigate on the optimal use of this technology.

Clinical Outcomes and Setup Reproducibility in Patients Receiving Synchronous Bilateral Breast Radiation in the Prone Position

Standardized radiation therapy (RT) positioning and planning are vital to treat both breasts without excess toxicity in patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC). We studied clinical outcomes and setup reproducibility in patients with SBBC treated in the prone position. This is a retrospective study of patients receiving RT for SBBC from 2012-2022 treated in the prone position. Patient demographics, RT dose and field, toxicity, and outcomes were collected. RT planning used gantry and table shifts to avoid entrance/exit through contralateral breast and organs at risk. RT delivery was standardized, with left breast treated first. After 2014, radiographic films were placed during the first 5 fractions to evaluate field overlap. Consistent overlap required re-simulation or re-planning. Positional shifts during setup were collected for patients receiving bilateral whole breast irradiation (WBI) and bilateral partial breast irradiation (PBI). A total of 45 patients were treated for SBBC. Median age was 67 years. Median follow-up was 28 months. 35 patients were treated with WBI (1 with low axilla on one side) and 5 with PBI. 5 patients were treated with WBI in one breast and PBI in the other. The most common whole breast dose was 40.5Gy, with a simultaneous integrated boost to the lumpectomy cavity to 48Gy. PBI patients were treated with 30Gy (n = 4) or 40.05Gy (n = 1). 8 patients (17.7%) had acute grade 2 and 1 patient (2%) had acute grade 3 dermatitis. This patient was treated WBI bilaterally and was known to have overlap on GaF. Physician and patient accepted higher toxicity for adequate coverage of bilateral upper inner quadrant tumors. Patients with grade > = 2 dermatitis had bilateral WBI (+/- low axilla) except 1. 6 patients had acute dermatitis in the sternal area (5 were WBI and 1 PBI). Only 2 of these patients had overlap on GaF. Of 20 patients with late toxicity follow-up (> 6 months), 5 (25%) had late grade 1-2 dermatitis. 4 (20%) were treated with WBI (+/-low axilla). 1 patient had both a local and distant recurrence. For setup and treatment delivery, couch shifts recorded for patients treated with bilateral WBI (n = 33) and bilateral PBI (n = 5) were minimal. Mean shifts in nearly all dimensions were limited to sub-centimeter or sub-degree changes, with 2D and cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging. Analysis of GaF showed that only 3 patients (10%) had field overlap. A new plan was created for 1 patient to increase the gap between fields, and for the others, patient and physician accepted overlap for adequate coverage. To our knowledge, this is the first study examining clinical outcomes and setup reproducibility in patients treated with SBBC in the prone position. This study indicates the feasibility of prone bilateral breast treatment with minimal shifts and overlap on daily treatments. However, we do see a higher number of acute dermatitis in patients treated with bilateral WBI (vs. PBI) and that overlap was not seen on GaF in all patients who developed sternal dermatitis.

Target Volumes Comparison between Postoperative Simulation MRI and Preoperative Diagnostic MRI for Prone Breast Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery

To investigate the correlation and difference between target volumes determined by postoperative prone positioning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and preoperative prone diagnostic MRI for breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) based on deformable image registration (DIR). A total of 17 patients undergoing prone whole breast-irradiation after BCS were enrolled, all these patients were undergoing preoperative and postoperative prone MRI scans. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on the preoperative MRI images, then expanding 10 mm to simulate the preoperative lumpectomy cavity (LC). The LC were expended to clinical target volume (CTV), and planning target volume (PTV) on preoperative and postoperative MRI sequences, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative MRI was registered based on DIR by a commercially available software system. The target volume, the distance between the centers of mass (dCOM), conformity index (CI), degree of inclusion (DI) were compared to explore the target volume variation for pre- and post-surgery delineation. And evaluated the relationship between CILC/CIPTV and clinical factors. The volume of GTVpre was 3.05cm3(range, 1-23.63cm3). The median volume of LCpre were 26.84 cm3 (range, 11.75-102.28 cm3). 0.85cm3 smaller than the LCpre, the LCpost were 25.99 cm3 (range, 5.98-41.95) (P = 0.04). The dCOM, CI, and DI between LCpre and LCpost were 1.371cm (range, 0.533-5.447), 0.221 (range, 0.041-0.516), and 0.472 (range, 0.108-0.804). There was no significant statistically difference between PTVpre and PTVpost (120.73cm3 vs 131.67cm3, p = 0.723). Compared with LC, the CI and DI between PTVpre and PTVpost were increased to 0.446 (range, 0.233-0.700), 0.636 (range, 0.362-0.834), respectively. Meanwhile, the dCOM was reduced to 1.239cm (range, 0.413-3.642). There was no obvious linear correlation between the CI with the GTV volume, the ratio of the primary tumor volume to the breast volume, the distance from the primary tumor to the nipple and chest wall, and the Body Mass Index (BMI), respectively. For prone breast irradiation, even based on DIR, the spatial correspondence of the target volumes between preoperative and postoperative MRI images were still poor. Therefore, it is not reasonable to delineate postoperative LC refer to preoperative diagnostic MRI based on DIR. Preoperative MRI also cannot provide individualized guidance for LC delineation according to tailored patient.

Improvement of semantic segmentation through transfer learning of multi-class regions with convolutional neural networks on supine and prone breast MRI images

Semantic segmentation of breast and surrounding tissues in supine and prone breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is required for various kinds of computer-assisted diagnoses for surgical applications. Variability of breast shape in supine and prone poses along with various MRI artifacts makes it difficult to determine robust breast and surrounding tissue segmentation. Therefore, we evaluated semantic segmentation with transfer learning of convolutional neural networks to create robust breast segmentation in supine breast MRI without considering supine or prone positions. Total 29 patients with T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images were collected at Asan Medical Center and two types of breast MRI were performed in the prone position and the supine position. The four classes, including lungs and heart, muscles and bones, parenchyma with cancer, and skin and fat, were manually drawn by an expert. Semantic segmentation on breast MRI scans with supine, prone, transferred from prone to supine, and pooled supine and prone MRI were trained and compared using 2D U-Net, 3D U-Net, 2D nnU-Net and 3D nnU-Net. The best performance was 2D models with transfer learning. Our results showed excellent performance and could be used for clinical purposes such as breast registration and computer-aided diagnosis.

Retrospective Comparison of the Lateral-Arm and Vertical Needle Approaches for Prone Tomosynthesis-Guided Breast Biopsy.

Retrospective Comparison of the Lateral-Arm and Vertical Needle Approaches for Prone Tomosynthesis-Guided Breast Biopsy.

An evaluation of radiation therapy patient body mass index trends and potential impact on departmental resource planning.

Radiation therapy (RT) offers a less invasive management option for bariatric cancer patients. As the proportion of Australians categorised overweight or obese approaches 70%, it is not well understood how this growth will impact RT departments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current and potential future body mass index (BMI) of RT patients at one centre, with the purpose of identifying variables that may impact resource planning decisions. De-identified demographic data including gender, age, diagnosis code, activity code and BMI were obtained from MOSAIQ® oncology information system for 5548 courses of RT commenced between 2017 and 2020, and retrospectively analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. Simple and multiple linear regression was used to analyse for statistically significant relationships between variables. Of all patient courses, 64% were overweight or obese. Average BMI increased over time by 0.3 kg/m2 per year. Courses related to the young and elderly had a lower average BMI. Breast, brain/skull, and pelvis/prostate treatment sites had a significant association with a higher average BMI. Thorax treatment sites had a lower average BMI, but this average is increasing at the fastest rate of all treatment sites. Prone breast courses had an average BMI 5.58 kg/m2 higher than IMRT/VMAT courses. Results demonstrate that patient BMI is increasing. Resources related to breast courses (breast board, prone board) and thorax courses (lung board) may experience increased strain in the future. Modifications to department workflow and scheduling are likely required. Further research into staffing implications is recommended.

The initial experience of MRI-guided precision prone breast irradiation with daily adaptive planning in treating early stage breast cancer patients.

A major challenge in breast radiotherapy is accurately targeting the surgical cavity volume. Application of the emerging MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) technique in breast radiotherapy may enable more accurate targeting and potentially reduce side effects associated with treatment. To study the feasibility of delivering MRI-guided partial breast radiotherapy or Precision Prone Irradiation (PPI) to treat DCIS and early stage breast cancer patients. Eleven patients with diagnosed DCIS or early stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy underwent CT-based and MRI-based simulations and treatment planning in the prone position. MRI-guided radiotherapy was utilized to deliver partial breast irradiation. A customized adaptive plan was created for each delivered radiotherapy fraction and the cumulative doses to the target volumes and nearby organs at risk were determined. The CT-based and the MRI-guided radiotherapy plans were compared with respect to target volumes, target volume coverage, and dose to nearby organs. All patients receiving PPI successfully completed their treatments as planned. Clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints were met in all fractions planned and delivered and the MRI-guided clinical target volumes were smaller when compared to those of the CT-based partial breast radiotherapy plans for these eleven patients. MRI-guided partial breast radiotherapy as a breast radiotherapy technology is feasible and is a potential high clinical impact application of MRgRT. PPI has the potential to improve the therapeutic index of breast radiotherapy by more accurately delivering radiation dose to the cavity target and decreasing toxicities associated with radiation to the surrounding normal tissues. Prospective clinical data and further technical refinements of this novel technology may broaden its clinical implementation.

Dosimetric Comparison of Supine vs. Prone Position Utilizing Traditional Linac-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Our institution recently completed a pilot trial using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) on a traditional Linac delivering 30 Gy in 5 fractions. In this study, we compared dosimetry of patients treated in supine versus prone positions. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Patients enrolled on our recent pilot trial and additional post-accrual patients using the same SBRT technique were included. All patients had early-stage breast cancer, met the APBI ASTRO suitability criteria, and were treated on a traditional Linac. Treatment position, breast laterality and volume, BMI, and organs at risk (OAR) dosimetry were recorded. Prone treatments were delivered on a prone breast board using sliding window IMRT, and supine plans used either IMRT or partial arcs. All prone and 15 of 18 supine plans used free breathing technique (3 utilized deep inspiration breath-hold). CTV was 1 cm expansion from GTV. PTV was a 3 mm expansion from CTV and excluded skin surface+3 mm. Laterality was controlled for heart dosimetry. A small subset of patients was simulated in both supine and prone positions with associated radiation plans available for comparison. For unpaired data, unadjusted comparisons of means were performed using two-group t-test, and analysis of covariance was used for adjusted comparisons. For paired data, unadjusted comparisons were performed using the paired t-test, and adjusted comparisons used mixed models repeated measures analysis. Statistical tests were two-sided. <h3>Results</h3> This study included 35 patients with 36 treated plans. One patient had bilateral breast cancer. Of the 36 treated plans, 18 were supine (11 right-sided breast cancer, 7 left-sided) and 18 prone (8 right-sided, 10 left-sided). Eight patients had comparison plans in both positions. For patients with left-sided breast cancer, heart mean dose supine vs prone was 0.49 and 1.14 Gy, respectively (p < 0.001), and continued to be significant when controlling for BMI and treated breast volume. Mean heart dose was not different for right-sided patients supine vs prone, 0.36 vs 0.47 Gy, respectively (p = 0.870). Ipsilateral lung V1.5 Gy was higher for supine vs prone, 39.44 vs 29.89% (p=0.017). Max rib dose was higher for supine compared to prone, 28.29 vs 16.12 Gy (p<0.001). For the subset of patients with plans in both positions, mean heart dose continued to be lower for left-sided patients treated supine vs prone (p = 0.001). Ipsilateral lung V1.5 Gy and max dose to ribs were lower for prone with p values of 0.003 and <0.001, respectively. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Supine treatment provided heart dosimetry benefit for left-sided breast cancer patients compared to prone. Benefit was independent of BMI and breast volume. Prone position offered lower dose to ipsilateral lung and ribs. The results from this study can help determine the best treatment position based on patient-specific OAR concerns.

Evaluation of setup accuracy for prone breast radiotherapy with a three-dimensional surface imaging system

Evaluation of setup accuracy for prone breast radiotherapy with a three-dimensional surface imaging system

A study of skin marker alignment using different diamond-shaped light fields for prone breast external-beam radiation therapy.

For breast cancer patients treated in the prone position with tangential fields, a diamond-shaped light field (DSLF) can be used to align with corresponding skin markers for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). This study evaluates and compares the benefits of different DSLF setups. Seventy-one patients who underwent daily tangential kilovoltage (kV) IGRT were categorized retrospectively into four groups: (1) DSLF field size (FS)=10×10cm2 , gantry angle=90° (right breast)/270° (left breast), with the same isocenter as treatment tangential beams; (2) same as group 1, except DSLF FS=4×4cm2 ; (3) DSLF FS=4×4-6×8cm2 , gantry angle=tangential treatment beam, off-isocenter so that the DSLF was at the approximate breast center; and (4) No-DSLF. We compared their total setup time (including any DSLF/marker-based alignment and IGRT) and relative kV-based couch shift corrections. For groups 1-3, DSLF-only dose distributions (excluding kV-based correction) were simulated by reversely shifting the couch positions from the computed tomography plans, which were assumed equivalent to the delivered dose when both DSLF and IGRT were used. For patient groups 1-4, the average daily setup time was 2.6, 2.5, 5.0, and 8.3min, respectively. Their mean and standard deviations of daily kV-based couch shifts were 0.64±0.4, 0.68±0.3, 0.8±0.6, and 1.0±0.6cm. The average target dose changes after excluding kV-IGRT for groups 1-3 were-0.2%, -0.1%, and +0.4%, respectively, whereas DSLF-1 was most efficient in sparing heart and chest wall, DSLF-2 had lowest lung Dmax ; and DSLF-3 maintained the highest target coverage at the cost of highest OAR dose. In general, the use of DSLF greatly reduces patient setup time and may result in smaller IGRT corrections. If IGRT is limited, different DSLF setups yield different target coverage and OAR dose sparing. Our findings will help DSLF setup optimization in the prone breast treatment setting.

Prone Breast and Lymph Node Irradiation in 5 or 15 Fractions: A Randomized 2 × 2 Design Comparing Dosimetry, Acute Toxicity, and Set-Up Errors

PurposeProne whole breast irradiation results in lower dose to organs at risk compared with supine position, especially lung dose. However, the adoption of prone position for whole breast irradiation + lymph node irradiation remains limited and data on lymph node irradiation in 5 fractions are lacking. Although the study was ended prematurely for the primary endpoint (breast retraction at 2 years), we decided to report acute toxicity for prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. Additionally, dosimetry and set-up accuracy between prone and supine positions were evaluated. Methods and MaterialsA randomized open-label factorial 2 × 2 design was used for an acute toxicity comparison between prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. The primary endpoint of the trial was breast retraction 2 years after treatment. In total, 57 patients were evaluated. Dosimetry and set-up errors were compared between prone and supine positions. All patients were positioned on either our in -house developed prone crawl breast couch or a Posirest-2 (Civco). ResultsNo difference in acute toxicity between prone and supine positions was found, but 5 fractions did result in a lower risk of desquamation (15% vs 41%; P = .04). Prone positioning resulted in lower mean ipsilateral lung dose (2.89 vs 4.89 Gy; P < .001), mean thyroid dose (3.42 vs 6.61 Gy; P = .004), and mean contralateral breast dose (0.41 vs 0.54 Gy; P = .007). No significant difference in mean heart dose (0.90 vs 1.07 Gy; P = .22) was found. Set-up accuracy was similar between both positions. ConclusionsUnfortunately, the primary endpoint of the trial was not met due to premature closure of the trial. Acceleration in 5 fractions resulted in a lower risk of desquamation. Prone positioning did not influence acute toxicity or set-up accuracy, but did result in lower ipsilateral mean lung dose, thyroid dose, and contralateral breast dose.

Gadolinium-based contrast agent attenuation does not impact PET quantification in simultaneous dynamic contrast enhanced breast PET/MR.

Simultaneous PET/MR imaging involves injection of a radiopharmaceutical and often also includes administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). Phantom model studies indicate that attenuation of annihilation photons by GBCAs does not bias quantification metrics of PET radiopharmaceutical uptake. However, a direct comparison of attenuation-corrected PET values before and after administration of GBCA has not been performed in patients imaged with simultaneous dynamic PET/MR. The purpose of this study was to investigate the attenuating effect of GBCAs on standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in invasive breast cancer and normal tissues using simultaneous PET/MR. The study included 13 women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer imaged using simultaneous dedicated prone breast PET/MR with FDG. PET data collection and two-point Dixon-based MR attenuation correction sequences began simultaneously before the administration of GBCA to avoid a potential impact of GBCA on the attenuation correction map. A standard clinical dose of GBCA was intravenously administered for the dynamic contrast enhanced MR sequences obtained during the simultaneous PET data acquisition. PET data were dynamically reconstructed into 60 frames of 30 s each. Three timing windows were chosen consisting of a single frame (30 s), two frames (60 s), or four frames (120 s) immediately before and after contrast administration. SUVmax and SUVmean of the biopsy-proven breast malignancy, fibroglandular tissue of the contralateral normal breast, descending aorta, and liver were calculated prior to and following GBCA administration. Percent change in the SUV metrics were calculated to test for a statistically significant, non-zero percent change using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. No statistical change in SUVmax or SUVmean was found for the breast malignancies or normal anatomical regions during the timing windows before and after GBCA administration. GBCAs do not significantly impact the results of PET quantification by means of additional attenuation. However, GBCAs may still affect quantification by affecting MR acquisitions used for MR-based attenuation correction which this study did not address. Corrections to account for attenuation due to clinical concentrations of GBCAs are not necessary in simultaneous PET/MR examinations when MR-based attenuation correction sequences are performed prior to GBCA administration.

Effect of Supine vs Prone Breast Radiotherapy on Acute Toxic Effects of the Skin Among Women With Large Breast Size

Women with large breast size treated with adjuvant breast radiotherapy (RT) have a high rate of acute toxic effects of the skin. Breast RT in the prone position is one strategy that may decrease these toxic effects. To determine if breast RT in the prone position reduces acute toxic effects of the skin when compared with treatment in the supine position. This phase 3, multicenter, single-blind randomized clinical trial accrued patients from 5 centers across Canada from April 2013 to March 2018 to compare acute toxic effects of breast RT for women with large breast size (bra band ≥40 in and/or ≥D cup) in the prone vs supine positions. A total of 378 patients were referred for adjuvant RT and underwent randomization. Seven patients randomized to supine position were excluded (5 declined treatment and 2 withdrew consent), and 14 patients randomized to prone position were excluded (4 declined treatment, 3 had unacceptable cardiac dose, and 7 were unable to tolerate being prone). Data were analyzed from April 2019 through September 2020. Patients were randomized to RT in the supine or prone position. From April 2013 until June 2016, all patients (n = 167) received 50 Gy in 25 fractions (extended fractionation) with or without boost (range, 10-16 Gy). After trial amendment in June 2016, the majority of patients (177 of 190 [93.2%]) received the hypofractionation regimen of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. Main outcome was moist desquamation (desquamation). Of the 357 women (mean [SD] age, 61 [9.9] years) included in the analysis, 182 (51.0%) were treated in the supine position and 175 (49.0%) in prone. There was statistically significantly more desquamation in patients treated in the supine position compared with prone (72 of 182 [39.6%] patients vs 47 of 175 [26.9%] patients; OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.24-2.56; P = .002), which was confirmed on multivariable analysis (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.48-2.66; P < .001), along with other independent factors: use of boost (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.95-3.77; P < .001), extended fractionation (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.41-5.79; P = .004), and bra size (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.50-4.37; P < .001). This randomized clinical trial confirms that treatment in the prone position decreases desquamation in women with large breast size receiving adjuvant RT. It also shows increased toxic effects using an RT boost and conventional fractionation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01815476.

Abstract P3-19-03: Preliminary results of a feasibility study assessing radiation response with MRI/CT directed preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation in the prone position for hormone responsive early stage breast cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has emerged as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) following lumpectomy for select patients. However, the challenges to post-operative APBI include targeting inaccuracy and the inability to measure tumor response to radiation. We hypothesized that preoperative APBI (pAPBI) could reliably target the tumor using MRI-guidance that is acquired prone in combination with our established prone breast radiation delivery. We developed methodology for prone CT simulation to establish radiation position, MRI acquisition in treatment position, registration of MRI-CT data for treatment planning, and treatment delivery with daily cone-beam CT using the same immobilization platform. This study aimed to assess the reproducibility, toxicity and local control associated with MRI/CT-directed prone pAPBI. METHODS: This was a prospective, single arm study enrolling patients &amp;gt;50 yo with clinical (c) Stage IA ER+/PR+/HER2- breast cancer intending lumpectomy. Axillary US and MRI imaging to confirm clinical node negative disease was required. A planning CT in the prone position was followed by MRI using the same prone immobilization platform. Rigid registration of MRI-CT data was used for radiation planning. pAPBI of 3850 cGy was delivered in 10 fractions BID with the same prone immobilization technique. Another MRI was obtained 4 weeks post-APBI to assess tumor response. The intensity, kinetics and volume of the lesion on MRI was quantitatively assessed and an experienced reader evaluated MRI volume and kinetic changes in the tumor post-APBI. Lumpectomy was performed 4-6 weeks after APBI. Simon 2 stage design required assessment after accrual of 19 patients for assessment of feasibility. RESULTS: Nineteen cStage IA ER+/PR+/HER2- breast cancer patients with a median age of 65 (range 51-78) were enrolled on the study, completed APBI, lumpectomy, and adjuvant AI. Median follow up was 3.4 years. Mean clinical tumor size was 1.1 cm ± 0.4 and mean path tumor size was 0.94 cm ± 0.6. There was complete pathologic response in 10.5% (n=2) and an additional 36.8% (n=7) were downstaged from clinical stage (measured by mammogram/US) to pathologic stage, resulting in a total response of 47.4% (n=9). Six (31.6%) patients had stable disease after APBI. Four (21.0%) were upstaged from clinical stage to pathological stage. Tumor response detected by MRI significantly correlated with tumor response based on clinical to pathologic stage (p=0.03). Cosmesis was rated as excellent/good in 89.5% (n=17) patients post-APBI. Cosmesis worsened to fair in 2 patients post-APBI, one of which required adjuvant WBI after focal triple negative breast cancer was detected on pathology. Three patients had positive macrometastatic lymph nodes on final pathology despite clinically negative nodes on imaging. One in-breast recurrence outside the RT field was detected by MRI at 14 months, resulting in a locoregional recurrence rate of 5.4% at 3.4 years. Another patient developed metastases at 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Using the same prone platform, all patients successfully underwent CT simulation, MRI acquisition, and completed pAPBI. Nearly half of enrolled patients had a measurable tumor response to pAPBI based on MRI and pathologic response, confirming the accuracy and reproducibility of defining tumor targets with our MRI/CT-directed pAPBI approach. While this methodology for prone pAPBI resulted in good cosmesis and local control and remains a promising approach for select patients, the challenge of excluding patients with subclinical lymph node positive disease remains. Correlative studies will determine whether Ki-67 and OncotypeDx pre- and post-APBI can help predict response to pAPBI. Citation Format: Sasha Beyer, Tamara Smith, Ashley Sekhon, Jose Bazan, Sachin Jhawar, Erin Healy, Lai Wei, Vedat Yildiz, Mohamed Mohamed, Michael Knopp, Julia White. Preliminary results of a feasibility study assessing radiation response with MRI/CT directed preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation in the prone position for hormone responsive early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-19-03.

Dosimetric Effects of a Commercial Breast Board Patient Support System

Aim: In prone breast treatments, a carbon fiber support device resides under the contralateral breast. Tangent beams are designed to encompass the treated breast and these often pass through the board at a shallow angle, resulting in significant attenuation. Our planners account for this attenuation by adding field-in-field dose to the deep part of the breast, through the board. Concern was raised about how accurate the treatment delivery is when the inherent uncertainties of patients’ positions are accounted for. Furthermore, transmission measurements are usually carried out perpendicular to the board, a non-clinical situation. The goal of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric effect of the board and the robustness of the plan to positional uncertainty. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two breast patients treated on a commercial prone breast board between 2017 and 2020 were selected for this retrospective study. To evaluate the board’s attenuation, we compared the plans with the board removed from the dose calculation. To quantify the robustness of this technique, we moved the beam isocenter with respect to the patient and board. Results: Our results showed that when the breast board is removed from a plan which was designed to account for the board attenuation, the average point dose increases by 7.48%, with a maximum of 22%. Comparing results with a mixed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and a least-square means analysis, our robustness evaluation indicates that anterior shifts at every magnitude (1 mm through 5 mm) make a significant difference in all dose statistics (D95, max, 95% prescription coverage and homogeneity index) investigated. In/out and right/left shifts resulted in an insignificant change in dose statistics. Conclusion: Prone breast boards can add significant dosimetric uncertainty into the treatment delivery process. Accounting for plan robustness in the design of the plan is highly recommended. A prone breast board design with support moved away from the beam path is warranted.

Comparison of two models of prone mammography-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy and tips in positioning

Comparison of two models of prone mammography-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy and tips in positioning