Prolonged Infusion Of Gemcitabine Research Articles

Induction gemcitabine in standard dose or prolonged low-dose with cisplatin followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II clinical trial.

The optimal combination of chemotherapy with radiation therapy for treatment locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an open issue. This randomized phase II study compared gemcitabine in two different schedules and cisplatin - as induction chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy concurrent with cisplatin and etoposid. Eligible patients had microscopically confirmed inoperable non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; fulfilled the standard criteria for platin-based chemotherapy; and signed informed consent. Patients were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Two different aplications of gemcitabine were compared: patients in arm A received gemcitabine at 1250 mg/m(2) in a standard half hour i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8; patients in arm B received gemcitabine at 250 mg/m(2) in prolonged 6-hours i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8. In both arms, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 was administered. All patients continued treatment with radiation therapy with 60-66 Gy concurrent with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29 and 36 and etoposid 50 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-33. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) after induction chemotherapy; secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). From September 2005 to November 2010, 106 patients were recruited to this study. No statistically signifficant differences were found in RR after induction chemotherapy between the two arms (48.1% and 57.4%, p = 0.34). Toxicity profile was comparable and mild with grade 3/4 neutropenia as primary toxicity in both arms. One patient in arm B suffered from acute peripheral ischemia grade 4 and an amputation of lower limb was needed. With a median follow-up of 69.3 months, progression-free survival and median survival in arm A were 15.7 and 24.8 months compared to 18.9 and 28.6 months in arm B. The figures for 1- and 3-year overall survival were 73.1% and 30.8% in arm A, and 81.5 % and 44.4% in arm B, respectively. Among the two cisplatin-based doublets of induction chemotherapy for inoperable NSCLC, both schedules of gemcitabine have a comparable toxicity profile. Figures for RR, PFS and OS are among the best reported in current literature. While there is a trend towards better efficacy of the treament with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine, the difference between the two arms did not reach statistical significance.

Induction Gemcitabine in Standard Dose or Prolonged Low-Dose with Cisplatin Followed By Concurrent Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Randomized Phase Ii Clinical Trial

ABSTRACT Aim: The optimal combination of chemotherapy with radiation therapy for treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an open issue. This randomized phase II study compared gemcitabine in two different schedules and cisplatin, followed by radiation therapy concurrent with cisplatin and etoposide. Methods: Eligible patients had microscopically confirmed inoperable non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; fulfilled the standard criteria for platin-based chemotherapy; and signed informed consent. Patients were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Two different aplications of gemcitabine were compared: patients in the arm A received gemcitabine at 1250 mg/m2 in a standard half hour i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8; patients in arm B received gemcitabine at 250 mg/m2 in prolonged 6-hours i.v.infusion on days 1 and 8. In both arms, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2 was administered. All patients continued treatment with TRT with 60-66 Gy concurrent with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29 and 36 and etoposid 50 mg/m2 on days 1-5 and 29-33. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) after induction chemotherapy; secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: From September 2005 to November 2010, 106 patients were recruited to this study. No statistically signifficant differences were found in RR after induction chemotherapy between the two arms (48.1% and 57.4%, p = 0.34). Toxicity was comparable and mild with grade 3/4 neutropenia as primary toxicity in both arms. One patient in arm B suffered from acute peripheral ischemia grade 4. With a median follow-up of 69.3 months, progression-free survival and median survival in arm A were 15.7 and 24.8 months compared to 18.9 and 28.6 months in arm B. The figures for 1-year and 3-year overall survival were 73.1% and 30.8% in arm A, and 81.5 % and 44.4% in arm B, respectively. Conclusions: Among the two cisplatin-based doublets of induction chemotherapy for inoperable NSCLC, both schedules of gemcitabine have a comparable toxicity profile. Figures for RR, PFS and OS are among the best reported in current literature. While there is a trend towards better efficacy of the treament with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine, the number of patients is too small for a statistically significant difference. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

A phase II trial of prolonged, continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.

7579 Background: Low-dose, prolonged infusion of gemcitabine has effects similar to standard doses in several cancers. We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged in...

A phase II trial of prolonged, continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

Low-dose, prolonged infusion of gemcitabine has effects similar to standard doses in several cancers. We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion plus cisplatin in patients with advanced pleural mesothelioma. Patients with mesothelioma received gemcitabine (250 mg/m(2)) in a 6-h infusion plus cisplatin (35 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. We used the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours. This study is registered in clinical trials (NCT01869023). We included 39 patients; 82.1 % were low risk according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer prognostic group. Partial response was observed in 53.8 % (21/39), stable disease in 33.3 % (13/39) and progression in 12.8 % (5/39). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95 % CI 3.2-10.6 months), and the associated factors were the EORTC risk and histology. The median overall survival was 20.7 months (95 % CI 10.7-30.8 months). The functional, physical and emotional roles and dyspnoea, insomnia and pain symptom scales improved. The most commonly graded 3/4 side effects were neutropenia (24.4 %), lymphopenia (14.6 %), thrombocytopenia (14.7 %) and anaemia (12.2 %). Low-dose, prolonged gemcitabine infusion plus cisplatin has acceptable toxicity and high efficacy with improved quality of life, representing an affordable regimen for the low-income population.

Low-dose versus standard-dose gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin for patients with advanced bladder cancer: a randomized phase II trial—an update

Prolonged infusion of low-dose gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) proved to be an effective treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer. One hundred and twenty untreated patients with stage III/IV bladder cancer were randomized to receive either gemcitabine (250 mg/m(2)) 6-h infusion on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m(2)) on day 2 every 21-day cycle (arm 1) or gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2)) 30-min infusion on days 1 and 8, with the same dose of cisplatin (arm 2). The 92 males and 28 females included in the study had a median age of 62 years (range 40-85 years). Among the 120 patient, complete response was achieved in 11.7 % (7/60 patients of arm 1) and 5 % (3/60 patients of arm 2). Eighteen patients in arm 1 (30 %) and 17 patients (28.3 %) in arm 2 had partial response on therapy. Thus, the overall response rate of patients in arm 1 and arm 2 was 41.7 % (25/60 patients) and 33.3 % (20/60 patients), respectively (p = 0.37). No significant difference in median time to disease progression (26 vs. 24 months, p = 0.4), median survival (12 vs. 16 months, p = 0.8), and 1-year survival (49.9 vs. 54.7 %, p = 0.8) was detected between arms 1 and 2, respectively. Main toxicities were similar in both arms with no statistically significant differences. Low-dose, prolonged infusion gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin is not inferior to the standard GC regimen with favorable toxicity profile and less financial costs.

Randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine and imatinib mesylate in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

1091 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) as a standard 30-min infusion has activity as a single-agent in metastatic breast cancer (mbc). Prolonged infusion of GEM at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m2/min is associated with greater formation of active metabolite and may result in improved antitumor activity. Imatinib mesylate (IM)-mediated inhibition of PDGFR reduces tumor interstitial fluid pressure allowing for improved chemotherapy penetration into tumors. We evaluated the addition of IM to FDR GEM in patients (pts) with previously treated mbc. Methods: This was a randomized phase II trial in mbc pts who progressed after 1 but no more than 2 prior cytotoxic regimens. Eligibility included measurable disease; no prior GEM or IM exposure. Group 1 received FDR GEM IV 1250 mg/m2 at 10 mg/m2/min (over 120 min) on days 3 and 10 every 21 days; Group 2 received the same FDR GEM dose and schedule plus IM 400 mg orally daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 every 21 days. Primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Sample size of 40 pts per group was needed to detect an 8 mo increase in TTP with the combination (80% power, α = .05, 2-sided). Secondary endpoints included ORR and safety. Results: Between 5/2006-4/2011, 44 pts were randomized (22 per group). Study closed early due to slow accrual. Median age 54 (31-75); median ECOG PS 1 (0-2); 52% were hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative; 27% triple-negative, and 20% HER2-positive. Median number of cycles was 2 in Group 1 (range 1-12) and 3.5 in Group 2 (range 1-13). Most common adverse events (%) of any grade, Group 1 vs Group 2 were neutropenia (68 vs. 78), anemia (48 vs. 65), thrombocytopenia (24 vs. 47), nausea (40 vs. 52) and vomiting (24 vs. 21). One gr 4 thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura occurred in Group 2. Median TTP were 2 mo (95% CI: 1-5 mo) in Group 1 and 2.5 mo (95% CI: 1-5 mo) in Group 2 (p = 0.3 log rank test). ORR was 9.1% in each group (95% CI: 1.6-30.6%), with 2 PRs in each group. Stable disease (≥ 3 mo) was 32% in Group 1 and 41% in Group 2. Conclusions: This study was underpowered to draw any conclusion regarding a difference in TTP between the two groups at the time it was prematurely closed. Combination of IM and FDR GEM showed a trend to increased toxicity compared to FDR GEM alone. Clinical trial information: NCT00323063.

Toxicity and Response Assessment With Prolonged Infusion Gemcitabine and Gefitinib With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Recurrent Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma -- A Pilot Study

Toxicity and Response Assessment With Prolonged Infusion Gemcitabine and Gefitinib With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Recurrent Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma -- A Pilot Study

Improved survival after introduction of chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma in Slovenia: Population-based survey of 444 patients

BackgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumour with increasing frequency throughout the world. Due to long latency after exposure to asbestos, restrictions in the production and use of asbestos have not yet alleviated the burden of mesothelioma. During the last decade, several trials confirmed the benefit of systemic treatment with drugs such as doublets with cisplatina and gemcitabine or pemetrexed for carefully selected patients in good performance status. The purpose of this survey was to assess the impact of systemic treatment for the whole national population of patients with mesothelioma.Patients and methods.A retrospective study included all patients in Slovenia with histologically confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma in the period from 1974 till 2008. Data from the Cancer Registry of Slovenia were supplemented by review of clinical records of the Institute of Oncology in Ljubljana where virtually all non-surgical treatment for mesothelioma was performed. We analysed the incidence, treatment, and survival of patients treated in the era of infrequent chemotherapy (1974–2003, the first period) and after it (2004–2008, the second period).ResultsThe survey included 444 patients, of whom 325 and 119 were diagnosed in the first and second period, respectively. Joinpoint regression analysis showed that after 1995 the trend in crude incidence rates increased more rapidly; the annual change was 0.03 per 100,000 per year before 1995 and 0.06 per 100,000 per year after. There was clear male predominance (70%) throughout the period covered by the survey. The proportion of patients above 65 years of age increased from 41.8% to 54.6% for the first and second period, respectively (p = 0.02). With a total of 52 (11.7%) operated patients, surgical treatment was rare and used only for selected patients with early disease and without comorbidity, leading to their relatively long median survival of 13.6 months. Chemotherapy was applied to 56 (17.2%) and to 96 (80.7%) patients during the first and second period, respectively. While a variety of older drugs were used in the first period, the most common regimen in the second period (applied to 91 patients) was doublet of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin. For the whole population of patients regardless the mode of treatment, median survival was 7.4 and 12.6 months (p-value = 0.037) for the first and second period, respectively.ConclusionsIncreasing incidence, male predominance and increased proportion of older patients confirm that the burden of mesothelioma persists in spite of a 15-years old ban in the production of asbestos. Modern chemotherapy, and in particular treatment with low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin significantly prolonged median survival of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in Slovenia.

Low-dose versus standard-dose gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin for patients with advanced bladder cancer: A randomized phase II trial.

266 Background: Bladder carcinoma is the foremost oncologic problem in Egypt. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine and cisplatin is an effective treatment for advanced bilharzial-related bladder cancer based on a previously published phase II trial. Methods: To compare efficacy and safety of both prolonged infusion and standard gemcitabine-cisplatin combination, this phase II randomized study of 60 untreated patients with stage III/IV bladder cancer was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine (250 mg/m2) 6-hour infusion on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 2 every 21-day cycle (Arm1) or gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m2) 30-min infusion on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 2 every 21-day cycle (Arm 2). Results: The 47 males and 13 females had a median age of 60 years (range 40-73 years). A total of 44 patients had transitional cell, 12 had squamous cell, and 4 had undifferentiated cell carcinoma. Among the 53 evaluable patients (26 patients in arm1 and 27 patients in arm 2), complete response rate was achieved in 19.3% (5/26 patients of arm 1) and 7.4% (2/27 patients of arm 2). Eight patients in arm 1 (30.7%) and 7 patients (25.9%) in arm 2 had partial response on therapy. Thus the overall response rate of patients in arm1 and arm 2 was 50% (13/26 patients) and 33.3% (9/27patients), respectively (p = 0.21). No significant difference in median time to disease progression (6.7 months versus 7.9 months, p = 0.42), median survival (9.7 months versus 8.8 months, p = 0.3), and 1-year survival (27% versus 6%, p = 0.3) was detected between arms 1 and 2, respectively. No treatment- related deaths occurred. Main hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were similar in both arms with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: In the treatment of advanced bilharzial bladder cancer, gemcitabine in low dose and prolonged infusion in combination with cisplatin is not inferior to high-dose short infusion gemcitabine and cisplatin in terms of overall survival, time to disease progression, and response rates with favorable toxicity profile and less financial costs. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I–II trial of prolonged gemcitabine infusion plus paclitaxel as a biweekly schedule for advanced breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines

Paclitaxel (PACL) plus gemcitabine (GEM) is an effective regimen for advanced breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines. A prolonged GEM infusion at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m²/min produces higher levels of intracellular active metabolites of GEM when compared with a standard 30-min infusion. In the present phase I/II trial, we investigated the association of FDR GEM plus PACL. 1,200 mg/m² was the dose of GEM recommended for the phase II study, in which patients received PACL at 150 mg/m², followed by FDR GEM at 1,200 mg/m² (total GEM infusion time = 120 min), both drugs administered biweekly. Forty-two anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer patients with disease recurrence following at least one line of chemotherapy were enrolled. Two (4.8%) and 12 (33.3%) patients experienced a complete and partial response, respectively, for an overall response rate of 38.1% (95% CI 23.4-52.8%). Median progression free survival and overall survival were 5 and 19.9 months, respectively. No statistically significant association was noted between in situ protein expression of RRM1 and BRCA1 (as assessed by immunofluorescence combined with automated quantitative analysis) and response to treatment in 15 patients with tissue available for analysis. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate, mainly consisting of G3-G4 neutropenia (9.6%) and hypertransaminasemia (9.5%). Biweekly FDR GEM in combination with PACL is an active and safe regimen for advanced breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines. A prolonged infusion regimen of GEM does not seem to improve the efficacy of a standard 30-min infusion.

Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma—correlation with excision repair cross-complementing-1 polymorphisms

Background:Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a platinum-sensitive cancer and excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) polymorphisms have been shown to predict survival in several cancers following platinum therapy. Patients and methods:This multicenter study evaluated the activity of oxaliplatin and prolonged infusion of gemcitabine (‘GEMOX’ regimen) in recurrent NPC. Baseline blood samples were genotyped for the presence of ERCC1-118 gene polymorphisms. ResultsForty-two patients were recruited, of whom most (61%) had metastatic disease. Of the 40 patients evaluated for response, the respective overall response and disease control rates were 56.1% and 90.2%. At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the respective median overall survival and time to progression were 19.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.8–22 months] and 9 months (95% CI = 7.3–10 months). Grade 3–4 toxic effects were uncommon. The distribution of ERCC1-118 genotypes from 29 patients was C/C (n = 17, 40.5%), C/T (n = 10, 23.8%) and T/T (n = 2, 4.8%). No differences in survival or response rates were found between genotypes. Conclusions:GEMOX is active in the treatment of recurrent NPC. Detection of single-nucleotide gene polymorphisms from genomic DNA in peripheral blood is feasible in NPC and further studies are warranted.

8051 Final results of a phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin + gemcitabine in prolonged infusion in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer less than one year

Although the results of treatment of ovarian cancer have improved over the past 20 years with the introduction of platinum and more recently taxoid-based chemotherapy, the majority of patients still die of this disease. Further improvements may be expected by the incorporation of other new agents in more imaginative schedules, perhaps including a sequential approach or neoadjuvant regimens. Other experimental approaches that show promise include intraperitoneal treatment, e.g. genetic therapy. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying clinical drug resistance will be important in the rational development of a number of exciting approaches aimed at overcoming this key obstacle.

Cap-dependent translation blockade and fixed dose-rate gemcitabine: Interaction in an in vitro bioreactor system

Translation initiation commences with the binding of eIF-4F to the mRNA 5′-end cap. eIF-4F binds the cap structure via its eIF-4E subunit, which is the rate-limiting step for the initiation of translation. This pathway can be inhibited by 4E-binding proteins (4E-BPs). The present study investigated prolonged gemcitabine infusion in combination with reduced eIF-4E function on NSCLC cell viability in an in vitro bioreactor system. To assess attachment to the hollow fibers, cells with dominant active 4E-BP1 were first analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Cells were treated with 0.5- or 2.5 h (fixed dose rate) infusion (same total dose), simulating human plasma gemcitabine concentration–time profiles. An interaction was observed between fixed dose rate infusion gemcitabine and presence of dominant active 4E-BP1. We conclude that cap-dependent translation blockade and fixed dose rate infusion gemcitabine treatment results in a significant interaction affecting cell viability in vitro.

Prolonged Versus Standard Gemcitabine Infusion: Translation of Molecular Pharmacology to New Treatment Strategy

Gemcitabine is frequently used in the treatment of patients with solid tumors. Gemcitabine is taken up into the cell via human nucleoside transporters (hNTs) and is intracellularly phosphorylated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophosphate and subsequently into its main active triphosphate metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine triphosphate (dFdCTP), which is incorporated into DNA and inhibits DNA synthesis. In addition, gemcitabine is extensively deaminated to 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, which is largely excreted into the urine. High expression levels of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter type 1 were associated with a significantly longer overall survival duration after gemcitabine treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer. Clinical studies in blood mononuclear and leukemic cells demonstrated that a lower infusion rate of gemcitabine was associated with higher intracellular dFdCTP levels. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m2 per minute was associated with a higher intracellular accumulation of dFdCTP, greater toxicity, and a higher response rate than with the standard 30-minute infusion of gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer. In the current review, we discuss the molecular pharmacology of nucleoside analogues and the influence of hNTs and dCK on the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine, which is the basis for clinical studies on FDR administration, and the results of FDR gemcitabine administration in patients. These findings might aid optimal clinical application of gemcitabine in the future.

Primary chemotherapy with low-dose prolonged infusion gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer: A Phase II trial

Background Gemcitabine is an active agent in the treatment of bladder cancer. The enzyme deoxycytidine kinase catalyzes the phosphorylation of gemcitabine into the active gemcitabine triphosphate. After an infusion during 30 minutes, this enzyme will be saturated, therefore, accumulation of higher intracellular concentrations of the active gemcitabine triphosphate could be achieved by prolonging the infusion time of gemcitabine. Patients and methods Based on previously published Phase I trials, the efficacy and safety of a combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine given as prolonged infusion were tried in a Phase II study of 57 untreated patients with stage III/IV bladder cancer, which is the most common malignant tumor among Egyptian males. Patients received gemcitabine (250 mg/m 2 during 6-hour infusion) on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin (70 mg/m 2) on day 2 every 21-day cycle. Results The 41 males and 16 females had a median age of 55 years (range 37–77). A total of 37 patients had transitional cell, 15 had squamous cell, 2 had adenocarcinoma, and 3 had undifferentiated cell carcinoma. The median number of cycles given to these 57 patients was 4 (range 1–6). Of 54 evaluable patients, 5 (9.4%) had complete remission, and 27 (50%) partial remission, for an overall response rate of 59.4%. These results are comparable to those of a previous Phase II study of the same combination but with gemcitabine given in the standard dose and schedule. Responses were observed at all disease sites. Both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity were treatable and not severe. Conclusions Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine and cisplatin is an effective treatment for advanced bilharzial-related bladder cancer. Toxicity, especially myelosuppression, is surprisingly mild. This combination deserves to be tried in other different disease categories.

Phase II trial of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine at a low dose of 250 mg/m(2) in 6h prolonged infusion with cisplatin in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifty-eight chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were included, 39 males and 19 females, with a median age 61 years (range 28-73). Thirty-four (58.6%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 18 (31.0%) squamous cell, and 6 (10.4%) others. Seventeen (29.3%) had stage IIIB and 41 (70.7%) stage IV. Treatment consisted of 250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine in a 6h infusion on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 of a 3-week cycle. A total of 219 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range 1-6). Of the 58 patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity and 56 assessed for response. The overall response rate was 39.3% (95% confidence interval, 26.5-52.1%) with complete and partial responses of 3.6 and 35.7%, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-6.7 months), and median overall survival time was 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.5-12.5 months). One-year survival rate was 41.4%. Hematologic toxicity was fairly mild, and grades 3-4 hematologic toxicities consisted of neutropenia in 18.9% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 10.3%, and anemia in 6.9%. No patients required platelet transfusions, no bleeding episodes were recorded, and three patients received packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusions. The main nonhematologic toxicities included grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 27.6% of patients, grade 1-2 alopecia in 63.8%, and grade 1-2 skin rash in 17.3 %. Low-dose gemcitabine in 6h prolonged infusion plus cisplatin is effective in NSCLC treatment. Toxicity, especially myelosuppression, is remarkably mild.

Biweekly schedule of cisplatin with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

17093 Background: Firstly, we conducted a phase I of a biweekly schedule of cisplatin with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine (10 mg/m2/min) and stablished the dose to perform a phase II. We present final results of a phase II with this combination. Methods: Patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed NSCLC stage IIIB and IV were included. Treatment consisted of Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 with Gemcitabine 1600 mg/m2 in 160 minutes (10 mg/m2/min), days 1 and 15 every 28 days. Chemotherapy was administered to a maximum of 6 cycles; if radiotherapy was planned, patients received 4 cycles. Results: From March-04 to January-05, 55 patients were included. Patient characteristics: Median age 59 years (35–75). Gender: 51 male 4 female. ECOG performance status 0/1/2: 8/43/4. Histology: Squamous cell carcinoma 26 (47.3%), adenocarcinoma 22 (40%), large cell carcinoma 2 (3.6%), undifferentiated 5 (9%). Stage: IIIA 2 (3.6%), IIIB 27 (49.1%) and IV 26 (47.3%). Treatment compliance: Administrations: Mean 6.7 and median 8 (1–12). Dose intensity: Cisplatin 20.35 mg/m2/week (81%) Gemcitabine 632.61 mg/m2/week (79%). Toxicity: Extrahematological toxicity grade 3/4 per patient: nausea 10/0, emesis 6/0, asthenia 31/1, anorexia 14/0, mucositis 1/0, diarrhoea 1/1, infection 4/0, hepatic 2/0, vascular 0/1 (pulmonary thromboembolism). Neurotoxicity grade 1, 13 pt and grade 2, 1 pt. Hematological toxicity grade 3/4: anemia 1/0, thrombocytopenia 5/1, neutropenia 21/9 and neutropenic fever 4/0. Nine patients were hospitalised due to toxicity. There was one toxic death. Response rate: Response was evaluated in 52 pt (3 pt died after first cycle). Overall response rate was 38.1% (95% CI 50.93–25.26%). Complete response 2 (3.6%), Partial response 19 (34.5%), Stable disease 23 (41.8%), Progressive disease 8 (14.5%). Survival: Overall median survival was 9.6 months (95% CI 7.76–11.43): stage III 10.46 and stage IV 8.8. Overall progression-free survival was 8.06 months (95% CI 5.95–10.18): stage III 8.9 and stage IV 6.3. Conclusions: Biweekly cisplatin with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine is an active regimen for advanced NSCLC with a good toxicity profile. This better rational way of gemcitabine infusion should be more profoundly explored. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of a 2-hour infusion of gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

17099 Background: Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine have shown increased levels of the active triphosphate metabolite that theorically could increase the response rate and toxicity. The objectives of this study were to evaluated the efficacy and safety of this combination of using gemcitabine as a rate infusion of 10 mg/m2 per min with carboplatin in front-line chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Fifty-four chemonaive patients have been included. 44 were male and 10 female. Median age was 63 years (19–75). 13% had ECOG 0 and 53.7% ECOG 1 and 33.3% ECOG 2. 32 (59.2%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 13 (24.1%) squamous cell, 1 (1.9%) large cell carcinoma, and 8 (14.8%) others. Eight (14.8%) had stage IIIB and 46 (85.2%) stage IV. Treatment was consisted of 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine given as a 2-hour continuous infusion (10 mg/m2 per min) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle an AUC 5 carboplatin as on day 1, repeating each cycle every 21 days. A total of 223 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range 1–6), and 15 (27.8%) patients received all six cycles. Results: Of the fifty-four patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity (according to the WHO scale) and 51 assessed for response (according to the RECIST criteria), the overall response rate (ORR) was 41.2% (95% confidence interval, 28% to 57%), including two complete responses (CRs: 3.9%) and 19 partial responses (PRs: 37.3%). As per the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the ORR was 38.9%. With a median follow-up time of 10.8 months, the median TTP was 5.0 months (range 3.7–6.3 months), median OS time was 11.5 months (range 9.9–13.1 months) and 1-year survival was 41.7% (95% CI 26% to 57%) and 2-year survival was 19.3% (4.4% to 34.2%).The main grade 3–4 toxicity consisted of neutropenia (55.6%) and thrombocytopenia (57.4%).Patients were required platelet transfusion in 27 cycles (12.1%) and haematopoietic growth factors support care in 56 (25.1%) cycles. No bleeding episodes were recorded. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 5.6% and grade 1–2 skin rash occurred in 42.6%. Conclusions: Prolonged gemcitabine infusion combined with carboplatin is manageable tolerated and its efficacy is similar to that of other chemotherapeutic schemes used for NSCLC treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prolonged gemcitabine infusion as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): A phase I study

1581 Background: The use of cytotoxic drugs concurrent with RT represents a promising approach in the combined treatment of malignant gliomas. Gemcitabine (dFdCyd) is a drug widely explored for its potential radiomimetic activity in different tumors. The present study was aimed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly prolonged dFdCyd infusion, administered in combination with RT as first line treatment, in adult pts affected by supratentorial GBM. Methods: Within 6 weeks after surgery, in the presence of measurable residual disease and KPS >70, pts were treated with fractionated RT at a dose of 2.0 Gy/daily fractions, 5 days a week (global dose 60 Gy). From 24 to 72 hours before the first RT application, and afterwards once weekly, pts received concurrent dFdCyd, at fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min, over a total period of six weeks. Planned dose levels of dFdCyd started from 200 mg/m2/weekly (level 1), with sequential steps of 25 mg/m2/w based on toxicity. Results: Ten pts were enrolled into the study: six were male, median age 55.2 years (range 44–75), with a median KPS at baseline of 85 (SD 9.71). The median time from diagnosis to the start of treatment was six weeks (range 4–7). The median RT duration was 6 weeks (range 4–7), all but one pt received the planned dose and all pts received concomitant CT. Four pts entered at Level 1; one pt was excluded from the study, due to rapid progressive disease during the treatment. Two of the three valuable pts presented a relevant neurological worsening; on this basis the dFdCyd dose was reduced to 175 mg/m2/w (Level -1). A total of six pts were entered at Level -1, and none of them reported DLT. No hematological grade 3–4 toxicity was reported. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity was observed in one pt (transaminases increase). After a median follow-up of 13.4 months (range 3–24), the median progression-free survival was 8 months (CI 95% 1–18), and the median overall survival was 14 months (CI 95% 12–17). Conclusions: The recommended dose of prolonged infusion of dFdCyd concomitant with RT is 175 mg/m2/w. The observed activity has been considered interesting enough to support a phase II study of this concurrent CT-RT schedule as first line treatment in GBM. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of a 2-h infusion of gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of using gemcitabine as a rate infusion of 10 mg/m(2) per min with carboplatin in front-line chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fifty-four chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC have been included, 44 males and 10 females, with a median age 63 years (range 19-75). Thirty-two (59%) patients had adenocarcinoma, 13 (24%) squamous cell, 1 (2%) large cell carcinoma and 8 (15%) others. Eight (15%) had stage IIIB and 46 (85%) stage IV. Treatment was consisted of 1,200 mg/m(2) gemcitabine given as a 2-h continuous infusion (10 mg/m(2) per min) on days 1 and 8 of each cycle an AUC 5 carboplatin as on day 1, repeating each cycle for every 21 days. A total of 223 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of four cycles per patient (range 1-6), and 15 (28%) patients received all six cycles. Of the 54 patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity and 51 assessed for response. The overall response rate was 41% (95% confidence interval, 28-57%) with complete and partial responses of 4 and 37%, respectively. The median time to disease progression was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.3 months), and median overall survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.1 months). One-year survival was 42%. The main grade 3-4 toxicity (according to the WHO scale) consisted of neutropenia (56%) and thrombocytopenia (57%). Patients were required platelet transfusion in 27 cycles (12%) and hematopoietic growth factors support care in 56 (25%) cycles. No bleeding episodes were recorded. Grade 3 nausea/vomiting occurred in 6% and grade 1-2 skin rash occurred in 43%. Prolonged gemcitabine infusion combined with carboplatin is manageable and tolerated, and its efficacy is similar to that of other chemotherapeutic schemes used for NSCLC treatment.