Prolonged Analgesia Research Articles

Letter Regarding “Adding Dexmedetomidine to Intra-Articular Local Anesthetics Results in Prolonged Analgesia After Knee Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” – Authors’ Reply

Letter Regarding “Adding Dexmedetomidine to Intra-Articular Local Anesthetics Results in Prolonged Analgesia After Knee Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” – Authors’ Reply

A Comparative Study between Ultrasound-guided Concomitant Infraclavicular Plus Distal Median, Radial, and Ulnar Nerve Blockade Versus Infraclavicular Block Alone

Abstract Background: Peripheral nerve blocks can be used alone as the sole “surgical” anesthetic technique as the initial step in providing prolonged postoperative analgesia. There are studies, where accurate deposition of local anesthetic perineurally has the potential to improve the success rate and reduce the incidence of complications of the infraclavicular block. We hypothesized whether a combined block of the infraclavicular brachial plexus and distal median, radial, and ulnar nerves would accelerate upper extremity anesthesia compared with an infraclavicular block alone. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective randomized control study conducted among 60 patients undergoing elective and emergency wrist and hand surgeries. A group of 30 patients received an infraclavicular block with 30 mL of a local anesthetic mixture containing 1% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.25% bupivacaine from Group A. Group B received an infraclavicular block with 15 mL of local anesthetic mixture containing 1% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.25% bupivacaine along with distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade with 5 mL each of local anesthetic mixture containing 1% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.25% bupivacaine. Pain score, assessment of sensory and motor functions, block performance time, and surgical anesthesia were observed. Results: The mean block performance time of Group A was 10.9 ± 1.1 min and Group B was 14.7 ± 0.5 min. The difference between the two groups’ block performance minutes was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The difference in the onset of the sensory block between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean onset of motor blockade between the two groups was statistically very highly significant (P < 0.001). The mean of Group A was 5.0 ± 0.2 and Group B was 2.1 ± 0.4. Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that using an approximately equivalent dose of local anesthetics, combining ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block with distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blockade shortens the onset time of sensory and motor block with improved block consistency compared to infraclavicular block alone.

A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Background & Objectives: Arthroscopic surgery is a preferred approach for shoulder surgeries due to its documented advantages of early postoperative recovery. However, postoperative pain remains a concern for which different techniques are used. Interscalene block (ISB), using dexmedetomidine (DXM) or dexamethasone (DXA) as adjuvants to local anesthetics (LA), is a common analgesic method. We conducted this comparative study to establish if any one of the adjuvants is better in terms of postoperative analgesia. Methodology: Patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were assigned randomly to three groups: Group A (LA alone), Group B (ISB with DXM), and Group C (ISB with DXA). Assessment of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, time to first rescue analgesic, and rescue analgesic (ketorolac) consumption were recorded. Results: Intraoperative and postoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure showed no significant differences among the three groups, suggesting comparable hemodynamic control. VAS pain scores were equivalent at 1, 2 and 6 h postoperatively, but at 12, 18 and 24 h, Groups B and C demonstrated significantly lower scores compared to Group A (P < 0.001). Time to first rescue analgesic was prolonged in Groups B and C, indicating improved and longer-lasting analgesia. Groups B and C consumed considerably less ketorolac overall than Group A (P < 0.001). Conclusion: While all three groups exhibited equivalent intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic control, the addition of dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to local anesthetics for interscalene block prolonged postoperative analgesia, reduced pain scores at 12, 18 and 24 h, delayed time to first rescue, and decreased total analgesic consumption. Both adjuvants showed advantages over local anesthetics alone, emphasizing their potential in multimodal analgesia for shoulder arthroscopy. Abbreviations: ISB - Interscalene block; DXM - Dexmedetomidine; DXA - Dexamethasone; HR – Heart Rate; MAP – Mean Arterial Pressure; VAS Visual Analog Scale. Trial registry: PACTR202210507488378 Keywords: Analgesia; Analgesia, postoperative; Dexmedetomidine; Dexamethasone; Interscalene block; Pain, postoperative; Shoulder arthroscopy Citation: Nashaat P, Mohamed O, George S, Mohammed A, Samy E. A comparative study between dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(5):850−858; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i5.2566 Received: June 13, 2024; Reviewed: June 20, 2024; Accepted: July 18, 2024

Real-Time Ultrasonography for the Placement of Caudal Epidurals for Thoracic Surgery in Infants: A Description of the Technique and Case Series.

Caudal epidural catheters threaded to the thoracic levels are increasingly utilized in infants undergoing thoracic and abdominal surgery, compared to lumbar or thoracic epidural techniques. Estimating catheter length traditionally relies on anatomical landmarks, but the lack of spine ossification in infants makes ultrasonography a valuable and noninvasive tool. We present 3 cases where real-time ultrasonography facilitated caudal to thoracic epidural catheter placement in infants undergoing thoraco-abdominal surgeries. Incision-congruent placement of the catheter tip ensured effective perioperative analgesia with low doses of bupivacaine administered as intermittent boluses resulting in potent and prolonged analgesia with reduced opioid requirements.

Efficacy of ultrasound guided sphenopalatine ganglion block in management of emergence agitation after sinoscopic nasal surgery: a randomized double-blind controlled study

BackgroundNasal surgery has a reported high incidence of agitation during emergence from general anesthesia. Emergence Agitation (EA) increases the risk of surgical site bleeding, falling off the operating table, removal of catheters and intravenous lines, and self-extubation. This study investigated the role of nerve block in EA. ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effect of ultrasound-guided sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) on EA after sinoscopic nasal surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of EA. Secondary outcomes included the quality of the surgical field, bleeding volume, inhalational anesthesia, MAC, VAS in the PACU, postoperative analgesia duration, and total 24 -h opioid consumption. Patients and methodsThis double-blind, randomized controlled study enrolled 120 patients, of whom 110 completed the study. They were randomly allocated into two equal groups: G1, which received general anesthesia and a bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPBG) with 5 mL lidocaine 2% on each side, and G2 (control), which received general anesthesia and a bilateral sphenopalatine saline injection of 5 mL on each side. ResultsA significant decrease in the incidence of EA was found in G1 compared to G2 (20% vs. 64%). Intraoperative bleeding volume was significantly lower, and surgical field quality was significantly higher in G1 compared to G2. Pain severity was significantly lower in G1 in the PACU, and 24 h postoperative opioid consumption was significantly reduced compared to G2. Additionally, postoperative analgesia duration was significantly longer in G1 than in G2 (9 h vs. 3 h). ConclusionSPGB effectively reduced EA incidence, severity, and duration after sinoscopic nasal surgery. Furthermore, SPGB reduced intraoperative bleeding, improved surgical field quality, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and reduced 24 -h opioid consumption after sinoscopic nasal surgery. RegistrationNational Clinical Trial Registry, NCT04168879

Liposomal Bupivacaine in Managing Postoperative Pain Following Shoulder Surgery

To optimize postoperative analgesia following shoulder surgery, current literature recommends multimodal approaches, including the use of regional liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic. The liposomal formulation of bupivacaine affords it a longer duration of action without a substantial peak plasma concentration; this combined with 3% free bupivacaine provides patients with substantial, prolonged postoperative analgesia following shoulder surgery. The use of LB as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative pain results in diminished use of opioids, reduced pain, and decreased length of hospitalization. Current literature supports these effects following a wide variety of shoulder procedures; however, some studies describe no benefit and list drawbacks including higher costs when electing to use LB instead of comparable, more affordable treatment modalities. In the interest of reducing the number of opioid prescriptions following orthopedic procedures, it is imperative to continue investigating the efficacy of LB as an opioid-sparing pain reducer. Recent literature suggests certain patient populations may be less suitable for implementing this treatment modality; namely those with a history of opioid use, prior surgeries, substantial systemic illness, and existing cardiopulmonary compromise. Patient demographics may be an additional consideration when determining the potential utility of LB to optimize analgesia after shoulder surgery.

Improving the Quality of Postoperative Recovery of Elderly and Senile Patients with Circulatory Insuficiency

A comparison of prolonged epidural analgesia (PEA) with conventional on-demand analgesia in geriatric patients with circulatory insuffi ciency (CI) who underwent surgery on the lower extremities demonstrated a pronounced opioid-sparing effect in them in the postoperative period. PEA in the postoperative period is indicated mainly in elderly and senile patients with limited cardiovascular system reserves, as epidural anaesthesia signifi cantly reduces the risk of cardiac complications in this patient population.

Comparing the Efficacy of Landmark-Based Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Preoperative Positioning and Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hip Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Subarachnoid block is the most common anesthetic technique for patients having corrective hip surgeries. However, adequate positioning for a successful subarachnoid block is a major challenge in this particular population of patients, owing to the site of fracture. Regional anesthesia, in the form of nerve blocks, is an effective means of alleviating such constraints and gives an added benefit of prolonged postoperative analgesia. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), under ultrasonography guidance, are a few examples of the commonly performed peripheral nerve blocks in such settings. However, the landmark-based techniques of nerve blockade still hold good in many resource poor settings, given the lack of ultrasonography facilities. To compare the ease of spinal positioning using the patient sitting satisfaction score between the landmark-guided FICBand PENG block. This study was done on 80 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade I or II with intertrochantericfractures of the hip joint scheduled for proximal femoral nailing. Patients were allocated into two groups of 40 each through computer generated random numbers, to receive 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine via the landmark-guided technique of FICB in Group F and peripheral nerve stimulator assisted landmark-guided PENG block in Group P, 30 minutes prior to spinal positioning. Time to passive leg raise (PLR) to 15 degrees and time to PLR to 30 degrees with a standard goniometer guidance at visual analogue scale (VAS) score < 4 and ease of spinal positioning through the sitting satisfaction score at the 30th minute were assessed. Any adverse effects and events of failure were noted. The duration of postoperative analgesia was measured through the time to the first dose of paracetamol on arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit. Statistical analysis was done using JASP version (0.18.3.0) using the independent samples t-test and significance was taken when p value was < 0.001. The time to PLR to 15 degrees and 30 degrees were achieved faster in the patients who received the PENG block in comparison to the patients who received the FICB, and the average patient sitting satisfaction score was significantly higher in Group P as compared to Group F (p < 0.001). While the overall amount of analgesics used in both groups was similar, the overall period of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in Group F compared to Group P (p < 0.001). The landmark guided PENG block is feasible and superior to the landmark-guided FICB for preoperative positioning and analgesia. The FICB provides a longer duration of postoperative analgesia for patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

Parasacral ischial plane block for lower limb surgeries: A case series

The para-sacral ischial plane block (PIP block) is a novel fascial plane approach targeting the sacral plexus. This technique simplifies the process as direct visualization of the sacral plexus or sciatic nerve is unnecessary. This retrospective case series includes ten patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-IV, aged over 18 years, undergoing elective or emergency lower limb surgeries such as debridement and below-knee amputation between May 2023 and November 2023. The block was performed in ≤ 6 minutes for all patients. Onset of subjective analgesia was almost immediate in those presenting with pain. Sensory loss occurred within 9 to 12 minutes. Motor block in the sciatic nerve distribution did not reach Grade 2 in any patient. Hemodynamic stability was notably maintained in all high-risk cases. Intraoperative supplementation with ketamine was required for one patient. The PIP block is a quick, easy-to-perform technique that offers satisfactory surgical conditions and hemodynamic stability in high-risk patients undergoing lower limb surgeries. It also provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and early resumption of oral intake with minimal procedural discomfort.

Comparison of the effect of intrathecal fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries

Background: Subarachnoid blockade is a safe, reliable, and inexpensive technique that provides surgical anesthesia along with prolonged post-operative analgesia. The quality of subarachnoid block is enhanced by the addition of intrathecal adjuvants, such as fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulfate to hyperbaric levobupivacaine. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fentanyl and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in orthopedic surgeries under subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study included 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing orthopedic surgeries. Group LS received 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+0.5 mL normal saline. Group LF received 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+fentanyl 25 μg, and Group LM, 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+magnesium sulphate 50 mg+0.4 mL normal saline. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamics were recorded. In the post-operative period, duration of analgesia, Visual Analog Scales scores, and side effects were observed. Results: The onset of sensory block was 4.04±0.74 min in Group LM (P&lt;0.001) as compared to Groups LF (2.01±0.23 min) and LS (2±0.24 min). The onset of motor blockade took 5±1.14 min in the control group, 7.01±0.94 in group LF, and 8.11±1.33 min in group LM (P&lt;0.001). The duration of analgesia in group LS was 183.73±12.08 min, 317±18.6 min in group LF, and 219.43±20.89 in group LM (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The addition of fentanyl and magnesium as adjuvants enhanced the quality of subarachnoid block when added to hyperbaric levobupivacaine. The duration of analgesia was longest in fentanyl, followed by magnesium and then control. The incidence of side effects was greatest in fentanyl, followed by control and nil in magnesium.

Pain Management Following Intracavitary Brachytherapy Procedures: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Background and objectives Intracavitary applicators are a source of significant discomfort after brachytherapy procedures while undergoing subsequent radiation treatment. With strides towards opioid-sparing anesthesia and analgesia, it's essential to find appropriate substitutes. This procedure requires adequate relaxation of pelvic muscles during the procedure and proper analgesia after the procedure, with the presence of intracavitary applicators, needed for radiation treatment. We studied the day-case safety and analgesic efficacy of adjuvants dexmedetomidine 3 µg and fentanyl 15 µg intrathecally to low-dose 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Methods Seventy females scheduled for brachytherapy procedures were randomly allocated to receive either Group I (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 3µg dexmedetomidine (0.3ml)) or Group II (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (1.8 ml) plus 15µg fentanyl (0.3ml)). The primary outcome was to assess and compare the brachytherapy (day-case) feasibility with 3µg dexmedetomidine and 15µg fentanyl (time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria). The secondary outcomes were the absolute duration of spinal analgesia, pain scores, patient satisfaction scores, and any associated adverse events. Data analysis was done using IBM SPSS software for Windows, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results All patients in Group I were discharged on the same day without any adverse effects. They underwent an intracavitary brachytherapy procedure under spinal anesthesia with stable hemodynamics successfully. The mean time taken to meet hospital discharge criteria in Group II was shorter than in Group I (258.43 ± 27.460 vs. 335.71 ± 21.114). The mean absolute duration of spinal analgesia was significantly longer in Group I as compared to Group II (406.82 ± 51.78 mins vs. 267 ± 16.23 mins) (p<.001). Seventeen patients required rescue analgesia in Group II versus eight in Group I (p<0.025). Conclusion Patients in both groups received excellent analgesia with enhanced patient satisfaction. Three µg intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine can be used safely in day-case brachytherapy procedures. It provides adequate anesthesia and prolonged spinal analgesia as compared to 15 µg fentanyl.

Biodegradable cannabidiol: a potential nanotherapeutic for neuropathic pain

Abstract Cannabidiol (CBD) is a promising pharmaceutical agent to treat pain, inflammation, and seizures without the psychoactive effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). While CBD is highly lipophilic and can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), its bioavailability is limited and clearance is quick, limiting its effectiveness in the brain. To improve its effectiveness, we developed a unique nanoformulation consisting of CBD encapsulated within the biodegradable and biocompatible polymer, methoxy polyethylene glycol-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (mPEG-PLGA). mPEG-PLGA-CBD nanoparticles exhibited negligible cytotoxicity over a range of concentrations in CCK-8 assays performed in human astrocytes and brain microvascular endothelial cells. Furthermore, in an in-vitro BBB model, they exhibited rapid BBB permeability without harming BBB integrity. An in vivo Chronic Constriction Injury animal pain model was employed to study the efficacy of mPEG-PLGA-CBD in doses 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg, and it was found that 45–55 nm CBD nanoparticles with an encapsulation efficiency of 65 % can cross the BBB. Additionally, 3 and 10 mg/kg mPEG-PLGA-CBD nanoformulation provided prolonged analgesia in rats on day 2 and -4 post-injection, which we propose is attributed to the sustained and controlled release of CBD. Future studies are required to understand the pharmacokinetics of this nanoformulation.

Comparative Study between Modified Pectoral Nerve Block versus Serratus Block for Analgesia For Modified Radical Mastectomy

Abstract Background One of the main objectives of anesthesia is to alleviate the patient’s pain and agony, by ensuring the performance of surgical procedures without any discomfort. Elimination of postoperative pain is indispensable due to the central, peripheral and immunological stress response to tissue injury. So there is a need for extended analgesia without any side effects to achieve this goal. Objective To assess the analgesic efficiency and safety of both Modified Pectoral Nerve Block versus Serratus Block in cases of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The duration of analgesia and effect on hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Moreover, undesirable side effects were studied. Patients and Methods The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of both PECS II block versus and Serratus anterior block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy surgery. The duration of analgesia and effect on hemodynamics parameters were evaluated. Moreover, undesirable side effects were studied. forty patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (20 patients): group (A) and group (B). Group (A): received a PECSII block with 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%. Group(B): received a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) using the same volume of 30 ml bupivacaine 0.25%. Results This study demonstrated that PECSII and serratus blocks have comparable analgesic properties in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Both blocks were associated with reduced postoperative pain intensity and morphine consumption, intraoperative fentanyl requirement, and prolonged analgesia. The two blocks were associated with hemodynamic stability and absence of major complications characterizes both blocks. Conclusion This study confirms that PECSII and serratus blocks provide similarly adequate analgesia following modified radical mastectomy.

A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block Type II versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy

Abstract Background Breast surgery is becoming more and more common. Patients are often middle-aged women and with high public awareness around issues of breast cancer. The numbers are increasing. Breast surgery is an exceedingly common procedure and associated with an increased incidence of acute and chronic pain. Regional anaesthesia techniques may improve post-operative analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery. Aim of the Work The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of PECS block versus PCA with iv morphine to provide prolonged post-operative analgesia. The secondary objective is to identify the side effects of both techniques as post-operative analgesic techniques. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized clinical trial study conducted in Ain-shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt for 6 months after medical ethical committee approval. The participants were allocated randomly into two groups of 25 patients each: group A: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by PECS block at the end of the operation before extubation, group B: Patients received general anaesthesia followed by the PCA at the end of surgery after extubation. Results The VAS score in the PECS group was statistically significantly lower at the 1st, 2nd and 4th hours. In this case, the use of PECS for postoperative analgesia is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment, but with less systemic side effect as the nausea and vomiting is significantly higher in the PCA group than the PECS group at the 6th hour, however, the need of intra operative opioids in PCA group is significant. Conclusion In modified radical mastectomy, PECS block is as effective as intravenous Morphine PCA in pain treatment. Compared with intravenous PCA, PECS block can be considered as a more preferable method because it can avoid the systemic actions of morphine used for PCA, and can decrease the need of analgesia intra-operative, however PCA analgesic effect last longer, less invasive technique and easier to be used while PECS block require hand skills and limited to 24 hours analgesia only.

Comparison of Post-Operative Analgesia of Caudal versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Blocks for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Repair

Abstract Background Hypospadias is the second most common congenital disorder in males after cryptorchidism, but it is the most common penile congenital malformation. It is an abnormality of anterior urethral and penile development in which the urethral opening is ectopically located on the ventral aspect of the penis proximal to the tip of the glans penis, which, in this condition, is splayed open. The urethral opening may be located as far down as in the scrotum or perineum. The penis is more likely to have associated ventral shortening and curvature, called chordee, with more proximal urethral defects. Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of penile block versus caudal block using bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia after hypospadias repair in pediatrics. Methodology This prospective randomized comparative clinical study was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals; Pediatric Surgery Unit. It included 30 male patient aged (1–8) years, ASA I or II patients undergoing hypospadias (distal penile and mid penile) repair. They were divided into two groups: Group P: Penile block (n = 15) received dorsal penile nerve block by using the subpubic approach technique. Group C: Caudal block (n = 15) received caudal epidural block using a 22-G needle in the lateral decubitus position. Results There was statistically high significant difference between the two groups in postoperative MAP and HR (p value &amp;lt;0.001) but no statistically significant difference between them in Spo2. FLACC pain scores were significantly lower in group C compared with group P at PACU and 3 hours postoperative (p value &amp;lt;0.001) but no statistically significant difference between them at 6, 9 and 12 hours postoperative. Also, The time for first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in caudal group compared with penile group (P &amp;lt; 0.001) and the total analgesia consumption was also significantly lower (P &amp;lt; 0.001) in group C compared with group P. Postoperative time of ambulation was significantly lower (P &amp;lt; 0.001) in group P compared with group C. Conclusion The current study revealed that Caudal block provided significantly prolonged postoperative analgesia, reduced the postoperative analgesic requirements and prolonged time of ambulation as compared with Penile block in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair.

Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block versus Caudal Block for Post-Operative Analgesia in Penile Surgeries in Children

Abstract Background Penile surgeries as hypospadias, urethroplasty and circumcision are of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the pediatric male population. Using optimal analgesic regimen provide safe and effective analgesia, reduce postoperative stress response and accelerate recovery from surgery. This study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound (US) guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) versus caudal block (CB) for postoperative analgesia in pediatric male patients undergoing penile surgeries. Methods The study was conducted on 40 randomly chosen patients in Ain Shams University Hospitals after approval of the medical ethical committee. Patients were divided randomly into two groups (20 each group) either receiving ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB group) or caudal epidural block (CB group). In the PNB group, patients were injected with 0.3 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ug/kg fentanyl. In the CB group, patients were injected with 1 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine and 1 ug/kg fentanyl. The two groups were adequately monitored and assessed pre, intra and post-operatively and they were compared regarding demographic data, pre, intra and postoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain control using objective pain scale (OPS) score, consumption of paracetamol in the 1st 24 hours postoperatively and complications of both anesthetic techniques. Results This prospective randomized controlled single-blind clinical study was performed on total 40 patients of age 3 to 10 years scheduled for penile surgeries. For the primary outcome, there was a statistically significant increase in time to first analgesia in PNB group than CB group with p value &amp;lt; 0.001 while there was a statistically significant increase in total dose of paracetamol in CB group than PNB group with p value &amp;lt; 0.001. For OPS score, there was a statistically significant increase in pain score in CB group than PNB group at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h with p value = 0.02, 0.005 and 0.01, respectively. Conclusion From our study we can conclude that US guided PNB provided significantly prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced the postoperative analgesic requirements as compared with caudal block in pediatric patients undergoing penile surgeries and also demonstrated that both analgesic techniques are safe.

Adding Dexmedetomidine to Intra-articular Local Anesthetics Results in Prolonged Analgesia After Knee Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To assess the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intra-articular (IA) injections of local anesthetics (LA) in adult patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IA dexmedetomidine plus LA versus LA alone for knee arthroscopy in adults. We used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model for all outcomes and conducted a sensitivity analysis with the leave-one-out method, as well as a subgroup analysis for the type of LA. We used R version 4.1.2 for all statistical analyses. We included 16 RCTs encompassing 799 patients, of whom 49.8% received IA dexmedetomidine. In the pooled analysis, time to first analgesia rescue was prolonged in almost 4 hours with the use of dexmedetomidine (mean difference [MD] 229 minutes; P < .001). We found statistically significant differences favoring dexmedetomidine in pain scores at rest and movement throughout the first 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (P < .001). Although the MD ranged from -0.3 to -0.9 cm, corresponding to a 3% to 9% reduction in pain scores, this change is not clinically significant compared with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Additionally, the intervention group showed a statistically significant reduction in cumulative opioid consumption over 24 hours (MD -4.5 mg; P < .001). However, this reduction did not meet the threshold for the MCID. There was no difference between groups on the incidence of hypotension (P= .190), bradycardia (P= .430), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (P= .550). Adding dexmedetomidine to LA in IA injections for knee arthroscopy significantly extended analgesia duration. Additionally, it lowered pain scores and opioid use, although these effects did not reach the MCID. Furthermore, this addition did not increase the risk of adverse events. Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

A ropivacaine-eluting poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) wound dressing provided enhanced analgesia in partial-thickness porcine injuries.

Partial-thickness skin wounds are some of the most painful injuries due to large areas of exposed nerve endings. These injuries often require systemic opioid treatments to manage pain adequately. However, in 2021 alone, the CDC reported nearly 17,000 prescription opioid-related deaths in the USA, highlighting the ongoing need for non-opioid treatment strategies. In this manuscript, we developed a novel single-application ropivacaine-eluting primary wound dressing that could provide sustained ropivacaine delivery to partial-thickness wounds and assessed its in vivo feasibility for prolonged non-opioid analgesia. Sustained release of ropivacaine from a poly(lactide-co-e-caprolactone) matrix was first optimized in vitro using dissolution testing and a Box Behnken design of experiments. The optimized dressing was then tested against a clinical control silicone dressing in a porcine partial-thickness wound study to assess analgesic effect, pharmacokinetics, and wound healing. The ropivacaine-eluting dressing showed a moderate analgesic effect in vivo, where normalized single pinprick scores significantly improved pain over the testing period (4-168h) (control vs treatment: 232±25% vs 145±16%, p<0.0003). Ropivacaine blood plasma levels peaked at 8 hours post-treatment, with a maximum concentration of 246 ± 74 ng/mL. No significant differences in wound healing were found when compared to control. The ropivacaine-loaded poly(lactide-co-e-caprolactone)-based wound dressing provided sustained delivery of ropivacaine to partial-thickness skin wounds and enhanced analgesic effect compared to a clinical standard control dressing.

Enhancing pain control in elbow rehabilitation; A case report of variable ropivacaine dosages through Brachial Plexus Catheter

Managing postoperative pain and discomfort during physiotherapy for upper arm injuries, including complex fractures or traumatic amputations, is crucial. Challenges include severe pain, stiffness, and limited range of motion. Physiotherapy is vital for preventing muscle atrophy, promoting joint mobility, and facilitating functional recovery.The successful management of postoperative pain and pain during physiotherapy in a 27-year-old female, who sustained multiple injuries including a displaced distal humerus fracture and a traumatic right-hand amputation, was achieved through the utilization of a continuous brachial plexus block with variable doses of ropivacaine. The patient’s history revealed a complex array of injuries, including a displaced distal humerus fracture and traumatic right-hand amputation, necessitating open reduction and internal fixation for the fracture and subsequent hand debridement. Despite addressing stiffness through capsulectomy, persistent concerns arose regarding postoperative pain and discomfort during physiotherapy sessions. To address these concerns, a continuous supraclavicular catheter was placed under ultrasound guidance, providing effective pain relief and facilitating physiotherapy interventions for optimal recovery. The patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation for the humerus fracture which was subsequently managed with amputation of several fingers and a hand debridement procedure. Following the surgeries, the patient complained of a stiff elbow, which was addressed through capsulectomy. However, concerns persisted regarding postoperative pain and pain during physiotherapy sessions, leading to the decision to place a continuous supraclavicular catheter. The catheter was accurately positioned under ultrasound guidance and tunneled under the skin, providing effective pain relief for seven days. Ropivacaine was administered as per the patient’s requirements, with a background infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8-hour intervals, a 10 ml bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine administered half an hour before physiotherapy, and 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine during physiotherapy sessions if pain levels exceeded 4 on the numerical rating scale. This case highlights the utility of continuous brachial plexus blockade for prolonged postoperative analgesia and pain management during physiotherapy in patients with upper extremity injuries.

Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia on Pain Perception After Simple Tooth Extraction: A Prospective Study.

Background and objective This study aims to explore the concept of preemptive analgesia, which is the technique of administration of analgesic agents before the painful stimulus. This bridges the time gap between the onset of action of the analgesic agentsand the wear-off of local anesthesia. Existing literature also brings up the concept of central sensitization, which is the hyper-activity of the nervous system in response to a noxious stimulus. Administration of preemptive analgesia prevents central sensitization and hence provides prolonged analgesia to the patient. For the benefit of this study, tab. Etoricoxib 90 mg was used as the analgesic agent. In addition, this study aims to investigate the effects of the administration of tab. Etoricoxib 90 mg 30 minutes before extraction of a single mandibular third molar on the effects of pain experienced by the patient after tooth extraction as compared to a placebo. Methodology This was a double-blinded, prospective, observational study. The pain experienced by 50 participants in each group was measured at 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). The independent samples t-test was then conducted to evaluate the results and draw out conclusions. Results The average difference in pain experienced was maximum in the first hour after the procedure. The mean VAS score reported by patients was 3.14 in the study group but was 6.40 in the control group within the first hour. This difference was reduced in the first six hours after the procedure, with the average score being 3.82 in the study and 7.16 in the control group. The difference was the least after 12 hours, with the study group experiencing a VAS score of 4.64 and controls experiencing a VAS score of 6.14. After the first 24 hours, the mean VAS score was 3.80 in the study group and 5.60 in the control group. Conclusions Preemptive administration of tab. Etoricoxib 90 mg can reduce postextraction pain in healthy adult patients as compared to placebo tablets, with a maximum difference in pain reduction seen at the end of the first six hours (P= 0.012) and the minimum at the end of 12 hours (P= 0.0197).