Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes and Mutational Profile Associated with Dysmyelopoiesis in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is defined by absolute (≥ 0.5 x10 9/L) and relative (≥ 10%) monocytosis in peripheral blood. Presence of significant dysplasia in any of the three myeloid series, in particular dysgranulopoiesis, is an almost constant finding in CMML. In the absence of a clonal marker, a scenario very unlikely with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), significant myeloid dysplasia becomes a crucial criterion for establishing the diagnosis. Although bone marrow dysplasia has demonstrated independent prognostic value in MDS, its significance in relation to CMML has never been assessed. The main interest of our work was to evaluate the genomic determinants of dysplasia and to assess its prognostic impact. We analyzed a series of 240 patients with CMML with clinical, morphological, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular information. Patients were diagnosed following WHO and ICC 2022 recommendations. As a novelty with respect to previous WHO classifications, the new definition of CMML includes those patients previously categorized as oligomonocytic CMML (OM-CMML). That is, myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) or unclassifiable myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms with relative monocytosis and a monocyte count of 0.5 × 10 9/L to <1 × 10 9/L. A total of 167 (71%) patients were diagnosed with CMML-1 and 67 (29%) with CMML-2. Likewise, 193 (80%) patients were diagnosed with dysplastic CMML, 55 of whom would meet criteria for OM-CMML, and 47 (20%) were diagnosed with proliferative CMML. We assessed associations between dysmyelopoiesis and gene mutations by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Dysgranulopoiesis showed a significant positive correlation with NRAS, TET2 and ZRSR2 mutations; while a significant negative correlation with SETBP1 was observed. Dysmegakaryopoiesis showed a significant positive correlation with ASXL1 and TP53. Dyserythropoiesis showed a significant positive correlation with DNMT3A and SF3B1. The heatmap and matrix showing these correlations, as well as the differences in the degree of dysmyelopoiesis among these specific mutations are depicted in Figure 1-A & 1-B. Later, we wanted to assess the prognostic impact of dysgranulopoiesis, dyserythropoiesis and dysmegakaryopoiesis in terms of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in our series. By applying the MaxStat package in R, it allowed us to detect the best cut-off points for dysgranulopoiesis (>75%) and dysmegakaryopoiesis (>20%) to separate our series into two groups with significantly different outcomes (Figure 1-C). We were unable to detect a significant cut-off point for dyserythropoiesis and the presence of multilineage dysplasia also showed no prognostic impact. CMML patients with dysgranulopoiesis above 75% showed a significant shorter median OS (34.4 vs 67.8 months; Hazard Ratio (HR): 1,99 [1.24-3.19]; P=0.0036) and LFS (33.4 vs 66.6 months; HR: 1,87 [1.17-3]; P=0.008). Likewise, patients with dysmegakaryopoiesis above 20% also showed a significant shorter median OS (30.2 vs 67.1 months; HR: 2.52 [1.63-3.88]; P<0.0001) and LFS (30.4 vs 66.6 months; HR: 2.76 [1.78-4.28]; P<0.0001). Remarkably, dysmegakaryopoiesis above 20% and dysgranulopoiesis above 75% were identified as independent prognostic factors for both OS and LFS after adjustment by multivariable Cox regression analyses by CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) and Mayo Prognostic Model. Furthermore, the addition of dysmegakaryopoiesis above 20% and dysgranulopoiesis above 75% to these prognostic indices improved their prognostic accuracy in terms of OS as assessed by a C-index for right-censored data (Figure 1-C). In conclusion, our study has allowed us to detect mutations in genes related to dysmyelopoiesis. In addition, both dysgranulopoiesis and dysmegakaryopoiesis have demonstrated a negative prognostic impact on the survival of patients in our series that was not captured by the CPSS and Mayo prognostic model. Their worse prognosis could be partially justified by their association with poor prognostic mutations (e.g. NRAS, ASXL1, TP53), which allows us to visualize them as a good surrogate of poor prognostic molecular profiles.

ASXL1/ TET2 Genotype-Based Risk Stratification Outperforms ASXL1 Mutational Impact and Is Independent of Mutant Variant Allele Fractions (VAF) in CMML

Introduction Truncating ASXL1 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Conversely, loss-of-function mutations in TET2 are associated with better outcomes, with the ASXL1wt/ TET2mut genotype being associated with the best OS and LFS-rates (Coltro G, et al. Leukemia. 2020). Contemporary CMML prognostic scoring systems - such as the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM; Patnaik MM, et al. Leukemia. 2014) and the CPSS-Molecular Model (CMM; Elena C, et al. Blood. 2016) - do not consider concomitant ASXL1/ TET2 mutational status or mutational VAF. We hypothesized that the ASXL1/ TET2 genotype would better risk stratify patients in comparison to ASXL1 mutations alone, and that this effect would be proportional to the underlying mutational VAF. Methods After IRB approval, we compiled a large (n = 888), molecularly annotated database of CMML patients seen at two US medical centers (Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson) via retrospective chart review. All statistical analyses considered the clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at the time of presentation to the respective institution. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact or Pearson χ 2 tests and continuous variables by Mann-Whitney U tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Survival was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed using the BlueSky Statistics (v10.3.1) interface for R. Results The median age of the cohort was 71 years (range 20 - 94), 67% were male, 46% had proliferative CMML (pCMML), and 19% had CMML-2. The distribution of low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk patients was 15%, 11%, 32%, and 42% by the MMM and 9%, 23%, 40%, and 28% by the CMM, respectively. The most frequently mutated genes were ASXL1 (45%), TET2 (43%), SRSF2 (41%), and RUNX1 (17%), while 40% harbored at least one RAS pathway mutation ( NRAS 16%, CBL 15%, KRAS 8%, PTPN11 4%, FLT3 2%). The median OS and LFS of the entire cohort were 31.8 months (95% CI 28.4 - 33.5 months) and 28.4 months (95% CI 24.6 - 32.1 months), respectively. Patients were stratified into ASXL1wt/ TET2wt (28%), ASXL1mut/ TET2wt (29%), ASXL1wt/ TET2mut (26%), and ASXL1mut/ TET2mut (17%) genotypes. Those with isolated TET2 mutations had the longest median OS (53.6 months; p < 0.02 for all comparisons) whereas those with isolated ASXL1 mutations had the shortest median OS (20.9 months; p < 0.04 for all comparisons); mutations in neither or both genes performed similarly (p = 0.9224; Figure 1A). The same trend was seen for LFS. We further hypothesized that the ASXL1 or TET2 mutation VAF would be more predictive of outcomes than a binary metric. The respective median VAFs were 37% (quartiles 28% - 45%) and 45% (quartiles 40% - 49%). When treated as a continuous variable, however, there was no correlation between either VAF and OS or LFS by both Pearson linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Unlike the overall cohort, the ASXL1/ TET2 genotypes did not further stratify patients with pCMML, CMML-2, or those considered high risk by the CMM in Kaplan-Meier analyses, suggesting that the high-risk features inherent in these subgroups outweigh the benefits of the TET2 mutation. In contrast, patients considered high-risk by the MMM were further stratified by the ASXL1/ TET2 genotypes. Incorporating TET2 mutations into the MMM as a protective factor (worth -1.5 points) improved detection of low- (≤ 1 point) and high-risk (≥ 4 points) patients, while intermediate-1 and intermediate-2 coalesced into a single intermediate risk category ( Figure 1B). A similar phenomenon was observed when TET2 was incorporated into the CMM (worth -1 point, yielding low- (0 points), intermediate- (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥ 3 points) groups with median OS of 83 months (95% CI 66.2 - 104.2), 34.3 months (95% CI 31.6 - 38.7), and 17.7 months (95% CI 15.7 - 20.2), respectively. Conclusions Truncating and hypomorphic TET2 mutations are associated with better outcomes in CMML, with the ASXL1mut/ TET2wt genotype being associated with improved risk stratification in comparison to ASXL1 mutational status alone. Counterintuitively, in our data set, this stratification was not impacted by mutational VAF, supporting binary mutational assessments in prognostic models.

Suppression of KRAS and CBL Mutations and Hematological Improvement By Lenzilumab and Azacitidine Treatment in Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Introduction: Mutations in RAS-pathway genes ( NRAS, KRAS, CBL) are amongst the most common somatic mutations in cancer and historically resistant to most therapies. Targeted therapies that impact the RAS-pathway constitute a major unmet need in oncology. The proliferative form of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is commonly associated with RAS-pathway mutations and has a high propensity to develop into acute myeloid leukemia. In pre-clinical models, Lenzilumab (LENZ; Humanigen, Inc., Short Hills, NJ), a proprietary Humaneered ® first-in-class monoclonal antibody with best-in-class off-rate and affinity that neutralizes GM-CSF, resulted in a reduction of colony numbers and viability of CMML cells, with the greatest sensitivity in cells possessing RAS-pathway ( NRAS/ KRAS/ CBL) mutations, suggesting benefit in the targeted treatment of CMML. The PREcision Approach to CHronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (PREACH-M) trial assesses the efficacy of LENZ, in addition to azacytidine (AZA), in CMML subjects with RAS-pathway mutations and high dose sodium ascorbate (ASC) and AZA in CMML subjects without RAS-pathway mutations. Interim data from 11 subjects with RAS-pathway ( NRAS/ KRAS/ CBL) mutations in PREACH-M receiving LENZ/AZA demonstrate reductions in circulating GM-CSF and CRP with 8 subjects achieving complete response or optimal marrow response. This report describes improvements in variant allele frequencies (VAF) for RAS-pathway mutations and hematologic improvements associated with LENZ/AZA treatment in CMML. Methods: PREACH-M is a Phase 2/3 non-randomized, open-label trial in 72 subjects, aged at least 18 years, with newly diagnosed CMML based on the WHO 2016 criteria; and RAS-pathway mutations at a variant allele frequency ≥3%. Subjects received 24 cycles (every 28 days) of AZA (SC; 75 mg/m 2 for 7 days) and LENZ (IV; 552 mg; d1 & d15 of cycle 1 and d1 only for all subsequent cycles). Subjects without RAS-pathway mutations received the same AZA regimen and sodium ascorbate (IV; 30g for 7 days (15g for 1st dose only; 30g thereafter if no evidence of tumor lysis syndrome); PO; 1.1g on all other days). VAF was determined from bone marrow mononuclear cells using a 41-myeloid panel using Illumina Hi-Seq with a depth of 1000x performed on bone marrow aspirates obtained at baseline and Day 1 of treatment cycles 4, 7, and 12. Results: As of July 2023, 11 subjects completed at least 3 months of LENZ/AZA treatments and follow-up sequencing data were available for 10 subjects. Five of 10 subjects showed >10% decrease in VAF for at least one mutation detected at baseline, including 5 decreased alleles in the RAS-pathway ( KRAS, CBL) out of 22 total VAF mutation responses. CBL mutations showed the largest change with a decrease in >50% VAF in three subjects. Decreases in RAS-pathway clones by LENZ/AZA were durable at 6 months. No decreases in VAF for any mutations were observed in 2 evaluable subjects following ASC/AZA treatment. Following 3 months LENZ/AZA treatment, blood monocyte count improved from a baseline of 11.0 ± 6.0 x 10 9/L to 2.0 ± 1.0 x 10 9/L (p=0.030). Blast differential improved from 10.5 ± 5.0% to 4.0 ± 3.5% (p=0.038). Platelet count increased from 90.0 ± 50.0 x 10 9/L to 150.0 ± 60.0 x 10 9/L (p=0.010). Statistical improvements remained durable for at least 6 (n=6) and 12 (n=3) months. Hemoglobin concentration increased 100.0 ± 22.0 g/L to 115.0 ± 10.0 g/L at 3 months (p=NS, n=11) and progressively increased to 122.0 ± 10.0 g/L at 12 months (p=0.024, n=3). Spleen length decreased from 15.0 ± 4.0 cm to 13.0 ± 4.0 cm (p=0.03) and decreased further to 11.0 ± 2.0 cm in subjects who received 12 months of treatment (n=3). No evidence of disease progression or relapse was observed in any subject. Conclusion: In 11 evaluable subjects with proliferative CMML and RAS-pathway mutations, GM-CSF neutralization with LENZ in addition to AZA standard of care, resulted in significant decreases in the proportion of KRAS and CBL mutant leukemic cells, accompanied by clinically significant hematologic improvements and a reduction in splenomegaly. Lenzilumab may have efficacy in preventing outgrowth of RAS-pathway mutations, specifically KRAS and CBL, in the context of CMML and other myeloid malignancies.

Phase 1 study to determine the safety and efficacy of onvansertib, a novel, oral, PLK1 inhibitor in patients with proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia relapsed/refractory or intolerant to available therapies.

TPS7089 Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative overlap neoplasm (MDS/MPN) that can be further divided into MD (WBC < 13 x 109/L) and MP (≥13 x 109/L) subtypes. MP-CMML is enriched in RAS pathway mutations ( NRAS, CBL, KRAS, PTPN11 and NF1), has a shorter median survival (19 vs 36 months), has a higher rate of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation (40% vs 10%) and has a unique transcriptomic and epigenetic composition. These RAS pathway mutations promote selective PLK1 overexpression, a mitotic checkpoint kinase. Given the relative inefficacy of hypomethylating agents (HMA) in MP-CMML and previously demonstrated in vitro and in vivo efficacy data for PLK1 inhibition on MP-CMML with RAS pathway mutations, we designed a phase 1 clinical trial testing the safety of onvansertib, a novel, orally bioavailable, PLK1 inhibitor in relapsed/refractory MP-CMML. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, phase I study of onvansertib in MP-CMML relapsed/refractory (RR) or intolerant to existing therapies including HMA and hydroxyurea. The primary endpoint is characterization of safety. Secondary endpoints include efficacy as defined by the 2015 MDS/MPN International Working Group criteria, volumetric spleen response and symptom response via assessment with MPN-SAF-TSS. Inclusion criteria include MP-CMML RR following hydroxyurea or at least 4-cycles of HMA or intolerance of treatment with either, platelets ≥ 20,000/m3 and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min/m2. Hydroxyurea may continue for the first 28 days on study. Onvansertib will be given orally on days 1 through 21 of a 28-day cycle with a Bayesian optimal interval design to assess the safety and recommended phase II dose. Exploratory end points include targeting efficacy, impact of PLK1 and KMT2A expression and interactions with ASXL1 and TET2 mutations. Twenty-five patients will be enrolled at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, with enrollment open since November 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05549661 .

Subclonal KIT D816V Mutations Are Prevalent in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Correlate with Distinct Phenotypic Features

Background: Activating mutations in KIT are infrequently observed in myeloid neoplasms, but are a pathognomonic finding in systemic mastocytosis (SM) where the hotspot D816V variant is documented in 90-95% of patients. In SM, KIT variants may occur at a low variant allele frequency (VAF) below the limits of detection of most commercial next generation sequencing (NGS) assays necessitating digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for accurate detection. Aggressive SM often presents concurrently with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN). Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is the most frequently co-occurring hematologic malignancy, but KIT mutations are infrequently detected by conventional NGS. The limitations in detecting KIT variants by NGS and increased frequency of CMML in SM-AHN suggest that subclonal KIT mutations may be underrecognized in CMML. Further, identification may have prognostic and therapeutic implications given the emergence of KIT-targeted therapies in SM. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was performed to assess the prevalence of subclonal KIT D816V mutations in CMML patients and examine clinical implications. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed CMML by WHO 2017 criteria, with available bone marrow (n=59) or peripheral blood (n=14) sample obtained prior to therapy. Samples underwent DNA sequencing using a 285-gene NGS panel (QIAseq), with a VAF threshold of 5% utilized for variant calling. KIT D816V mutations were assessed by ddPCR, with limit of detection of 0.03%. Clinical data was collected from baseline and follow up for phenotypic and prognostic comparisons. Fishers exact and Chi-square tests were used to compare categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), with the log rank test used to compare survival between groups. The study was approved by institutional review boards at each institution. Results: A total of 73 patients were included with a median age of 71, and 66% were male. By WHO criteria, 50% were classified as CMML-0, 28% CMML-1, and 22% CMML-2; 59% of patients had proliferative CMML by FAB criteria. KIT D816V mutations were detected in 15 patients (21%) by ddPCR, compared to two (3%) by NGS. The median VAF of mutations detected by ddPCR was 0.06%, whereas the two variants detected by NGS had VAFs of 44.1% and 47.0%. Baseline characteristics of KIT wild-type (WT) and mutated (MUT) patients are detailed in Table 1. KIT MUT patients had lower white blood cell (p=0.007) and absolute monocyte counts (p=0.04), less frequent splenomegaly (p=0.05), more frequent karyotype abnormalities (p=0.14), and lower frequency of proliferative disease by FAB criteria (p=0.01). There was a median of 4 variants (range 0-7) detected per patient by NGS, and the most frequently mutated genes were TET2 (59%), SRSF2 (44%), ASXL1 (33%),RUNX1 (25%), and NRAS (25%). KIT MUT patients had a median of 3 total variants (range 0-6) detected by NGS compared to 4 (range 0-7) in KIT WT (p=0.63). There was a trend toward higher frequency of SF3B1 (23% vs. 5%, p=0.07) mutations in KIT MUT patients. Conversely, no mutations were observed in KRAS or CBL in KIT MUT patients, compared to 14% and 16% in KIT WT, respectively (p=0.34, p=0.20). When evaluating mutations in signaling pathways, there was a trend toward lower frequency in KIT MUT patients compared to WT (31% vs. 59%, p=0.12). With a median follow up of 48 months, median OS of the cohort was 30 months. KIT MUT patients demonstrated an OS of 27.5 months compared to 30 months in WT patients (HR 1.06, p=0.87). Transformation to AML was observed in 42% of KIT MUT patients compared to 29% of WT patients (p=0.49). A similar proportion of patients were treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), with a response rate of 14% in KIT MUT patients compared to 32% in WT (p=0.63), and complete remission rates of 0% vs. 27%, respectively. Conclusions: This study is the first to document the prevalence of subclonal KIT D816V mutations by ddPCR in CMML, revealing a high prevalence in comparison to detection by standard NGS assays. While sample size limited statistical comparisons, KIT mutations were associated with distinct phenotypic features, including less proliferative disease and poor response to HMAs. Given the efficacy of KIT inhibitors in SM-CMML, these findings could represent an avenue for targeted therapy in CMML. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Symptomatic Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML): Results of a Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

Introduction CMML is a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) with poor overall survival (OS). Like primary myelofibrosis, a large subset of CMML patients suffer from disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly that contribute to morbidity. We have demonstrated that CMML is molecularly characterized by hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell hypersensitivity to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). As the sentinel kinase required for GM-CSF signaling, JAK2 represents a rational therapeutic target in CMML and pharmacologic inhibition has demonstrated activity in preclinical models and in a phase I/II clinical trial. The overall response rate in that trial was 38% by MDS/MPN IWG criteria and 43% of patients (pts) with baseline splenomegaly achieved a spleen response by palpation. However, that clinical trial did not systematically or objectively measure symptom burden or radiographic splenomegaly. Here, we report results of our second phase II clinical trial with ruxolitinib for treatment of CMML objectively measuring spleen responses and symptom improvement. Methods This was a phase II prospective multicenter study. Key eligibility criteria included confirmed diagnosis of CMML and having either symptomatic splenomegaly and/or a myeloproliferative neoplasms symptom assessment form (MPN-SAF) total score (TSS) >17, ANC ≥ 250/ul, and platelets ≥35,000 u/l. Ruxolitinib was administered at 20 mg po BID at the previously identified RP2D. Dose adjustments/holding occurred for both hematological and non-hematological parameters. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit or better response per International Working Group (IWG) criteria for MDS/MPNs and symptom improvement was assessed using the MPN-SAF TSS. Pts were treated at least for 16 weeks if no clear progression and those deriving a clinical benefit could continue on study. Serial blood counts, chemistry and bone marrow assessment were conducted to assure safety and assess efficacy. Spleen volume was measured by CT imaging and the percentage of spleen volume reduction (SVR) was captured. Daily measurements of the MPN-SAF were performed for up to 17 weeks while on study. Results A total of 29 pts were enrolled at 4 centers (Moffitt, John Hopkins, Cleveland Clinic and Dana Farber) between September 2019 and June 2022. The median age was 74 (63-87) years. The majority were white (93%) and male (62%) consistent with the known demographics of CMML. Most pts had CMML-0 (62%) and proliferative CMML (69%) by the French American British group criteria. Fifty nine percent were high risk by the Mayo Clinic CMML risk model. Two patients had prior hypomethylating agent treatment and two had prior hydroxyurea. The most common somatic mutations at baseline were TET2 (79%), SRSF2 (68%) and ASXL1(48%). NRAS (21%), CBL (37%), and JAK2 (21%) were seen at higher proportions than previously reported likely due to study inclusion criteria. The median duration of follow up was 16 months and at the data cut off 8 pts remains on treatment. The median duration on treatment was 4 mo (.5-23 mo). Treatment-related adverse events and reasons for discontinuation are similar to that reported in the initial phase 1/2 study. The overall response rate by MDS/MPN IWG criteria was 17%: 10% (3) partial response and 7% (2) marrow response; 69% (20) had stable disease and 14% (4) were not yet evaluable. In addition, a clinical benefit was achieved in 66% of pts (19/29). Among 20 pts evaluable for spleen response, 30% (6/20) achieved ≥ 35% SVR measured by CT scan and 10/20 (50%) had 10% or more SVR (Figure 1a). Fifty four percent of patients achieved MPN-SAF TSS >50% reduction at 60 days and all but four patients demonstrated an improvement in MPN-SAF TSS (Figure 1b). The estimated median overall survival was 24 months (95% CI 9-39). Conclusions Ruxoltinib demonstrated meaningful clinical activity in CMML patients with splenomegaly and/or high disease symptom burden. Two thirds of patients achieved clinical benefit, 33% had ≥ 35% SVR, and 54% had a reduction in TSS>50%. The overall survival compares favorably to historical data among higher risk CMML and the magnitude of symptomatic benefit is similar to that observed in primary myelofibrosis. Collectively, our data suggests that ruxolitinib is a viable therapeutic for patients with symptomatic CMML. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Treatment with Oral Azacitidine in Elderly Patients with Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes after Response to Subcutaneous Azacitidine

Background Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are the standard of care for (elderly) IPSS-R higher risk MDS (HR-MDS) patients, but HMA treatment for those patients who are not eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant has to be continued for very long time to maintain efficacy. This prolonged continuous treatment renders patients dependent on hospital and on caregivers, and as a result, decreases QoL and too often provokes premature interruption of therapy. Oral azacitidine is approved for maintenance therapy of acute myeloid leukemia patients in complete remission after intensive chemotherapy, and it has shown activity in lower risk MDS. Oral decitabine has been recently approved by FDA for treatment of MDS. There are no data regarding maintenance of response achieved by sc azacitidine in HR MDS by switching to the oral formulation. Aim The primary objective of the study is to explore the feasibility of replacing subcutaneous (sc) azacitidine by the oral formulation, in patients with HR-MDS and responding to sc azacitidine as well as the maintenance or improvement of the achieved hematological response (time to relapse/progression).Methods A monocentric, pilot phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04806906) was planned to enroll 10 subjects with confirmed diagnosis of MDS or dysplastic non proliferative CMML, IPSS-R higher risks, aged ≥ 65 years, in CR/CRi, PR or SD with HI stable for additional 2 cycles after response at 4-6 cycles of azacitidine therapy, hence a total of at minimum 6 to 8 cycles of sc azacitidine. At screening, morphological MDS diagnosis, cytogenetic analysis, IWG response assessment, bone marrow and peripheral blood sampling for flow cytometric analysis, NGS evaluation of somatic mutations, DNA methylation analysis and HRQoL are performed. During treatment, subjects are assessed for safety, tolerability and efficacy of oral azacitidine. Assessments during treatment include monitoring for AEs, monitoring for loss of response and SPMs, physical examination, vital signs and weight measurement, ECOG performance status, hematology and serum chemistry, serum ferritin level, concomitant medications, therapies and procedures, review of bone marrow aspirate or biopsy. Patients receive 300 mg oral azacitidine for the first 14 days of each 28-day treatment cycle until no longer receiving the benefit or until progression. Dose of oral azacitidine can be de-escalated based on toxicity. Besides feasibility of treatment with oral azacitidine, we evaluate safety/tolerability, time to treatment discontinuation, and patient-reported outcomes, utilizing the EQ-5D, and measures of healthcare resource utilization. DNA methylation pattern of bone marrow CD34 positive cells at diagnosis, after response to sc azacitidine, and after 2 and 4 cycles of oral azacitidine is also determined by ERRBS for all patients. Results As per August 1, 2022, with a follow up ranging from 1-10 months, 5 HR MDS patients have been enrolled in the study. Median age is 81 yrs (79-86). Male/female ratio: 4/1. At start of therapy with sc azacitidine IPSS-R risk was high 3/5, very high 2/5. Median number of cycles of sc azacitidine is 25 (7-56), median number of cycles of oral azacitidine is 4 (1-9). The dose of 300mg/day was maintained for all patients. Pattern of DNA methylation determined by ERRBS is available for all treated patients and confirms the activity of oral azacitidine. Two patients evolved to AML after 9 and 4 cycles of oral azacitidine, with progression free survival (PFS) from onset of therapy of 17 and 12 months respectively. None of those 2 patients had adverse events during therapy. Treatment was interrupted after 2 cycles in 1 patient following a GI event grade 3 and following patient decision; 2 patients are still ongoing without report of hematological or non-hematological toxicity. At present 1/5 patients died with AML. Conclusions. The patients included in this study were HR MDS, particularly frail, not eligible to investigational studies because of poor compliance and very old median age. The administration of oral azacitidine in patients who responded to sc azacitidine is feasible, the treatment is very well tolerated with no AEs different from those observed in sc azacitidine treatment. Two of five treated patients experienced progressive disease after >12 months of HMA therapy from diagnosis. Oral azacitidine may allow prolonged and continuous treatment in frail HR MDS, optimizing outcome.

How I diagnose and treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative overlap neoplasm characterized by sustained peripheral blood monocytosis and an inherent risk for transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (15-30% over 3-5 years). While CMML is morphologically classified into CMML-0, 1 and 2 based on peripheral blood and bone marrow promonocyte/blast counts, a more clinically relevant classification into dysplastic and proliferative subtypes, based on the presenting white blood cell count, is helpful in prognostication and therapeutics. CMML is a neoplasm associated with aging, occurring on the background of clonal hematopoiesis, with TET2 and SRSF2 mutations being early initiating events. The subsequent acquisitions of ASXL1, RUNX1, SF3B1 and DNMT3A mutations usually give rise to dysplastic CMML, while ASXL1, JAK2V617F and RAS pathway mutations give rise to proliferative CMML. Patients with proliferative CMML have a more aggressive course with higher rates of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only potential cure for CMML; however, given the advanced median age at presentation (73 years) and comorbidities, it is an option for only a few affected patients (10%). While DNA methyltransferase inhibitors are approved for the management of CMML, the overall response rates are 40-50%, with true complete remission rates of <20%. These agents seem to be particularly ineffective in proliferative CMML subtypes with RAS mutations, while the TET2mutant/ASXL1wildtype genotype seems to be the best predictor for responses. These agents epigenetically restore hematopoiesis in responding patients without altering mutational allele burdens and progression remains inevitable. Rationally derived personalized/targeted therapies with disease-modifying capabilities are much needed.

Outcome with Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination in Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Outcome with Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination in Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Clinical Outcomes of Oligomonocytic Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (OM-CMML) and Predictive Factors of Evolution of OM-CMML into Overt Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

INTRODUCTIONRecent studies have shown that OM-CMML and CMML have a similar clinical and biological profile. Since the proliferative-CMML (P-CMML) is the last-stage of CMML proliferative continuum and shows poor outcomes, it is expected that OM-CMML presents the best outcomes of these entities, as it represents an early-stage of dysplastic-CMML (D-CMML). In this sense, although a high percentage of OM-CMML evolve to CMML, some of them die before evolving. Therefore, identifying predictive factors of evolution into CMML may be valuable since, OM-CMML that evolves to CMML show shorter overall survival (OS) (Calvo X et al. Blood Adv 2020).AIMTo analyze clinical outcomes of 41 OM-CMML patients and to compare them to that of 182 overt CMML (141 D-CMML and 41 P-CMML), and to assess predictive factors of evolution of OM-CMML into overt CMML.RESULTSOM-CMML showed longer OS than D-CMML and P-CMML (Figure 1). OM-CMML also showed longer AML-free survival than D-CMML (median OS: 131.8m vs. 43.47m; P=0.001) and P-CMML (median OS: 23m; P<0.01). These outcomes were retained after multivariate adjustment by CPSS (HR:0.38, 95%CI 0.21-0.70, P=0.002; HR:2.53, 95%CI 1.64-3.91, P=<0.001), CPSS-P (HR:0.42, 95%CI 0.23-0.78, P=0.005; HR:2.82, 95%CI 1.92-4.14, P=<0.001), and Mayo-prognostic-model (HR:0.41, 95CI 0.23-0.75, P=0.04; HR:3.45, 95%CI 2.29-5.20, P=<0.001). At a median follow-up of 45 months, 29% of D-CMML evolved to P-CMML. There was no difference in OS between D-CMML patients that evolved to P-CMML than those who did not. Nevertheless, from the moment of evolution, they had a very short survival (median OS: 10.2 months). This suggests that P-CMML evolution is the latest stage of a biological continuum that initiates in OM-CMML. Reinforcing this idea, mutations associated with proliferation (i.e: ASXL1 and RAS-pathway) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS in our series (HR ASXL1:2.47, 95%CI 1.13-5.37, P=0.023; HR RAS-pathway:3.91, 95%CI 1.74-8.77, P=0.001).As previously commented, OM-CMML patients who evolved to overt CMML showed an inferior OS than did those who did not. At a median follow-up of 42 months, 30% OM-CMML evolved to CMML. Patients with more than 3 mutated genes (HR: 4.24, 95%CI 1.08-16.71, P=0.039) and a proportion of monocytes above 20% in peripheral blood (HR: 3.48, 95%CI 1.05-11.47, P=0.041) showed a significant shorter time to CMML. These two variables were faced in a multivariate analysis and maintained their significance for predicting time to CMML (HR: 4.33, 95%CI 1.23-15.20, P=0.022; and HR:5.82, 95%CI 1.32-25.7 , P=0.02). Moreover, these variables were also independent adverse prognostic factors for OS in our series of 94 patients with available molecular data (41 OM-CMML and 53 CMML) (HR:4.39, 95%CI 1.99-9.68 , P<0.001; HR:3.05 , 95%CI 1.27-7.34 , P=0.013). Figure 2 depicts univariate survival analysis. Given the similar HR for predicting time to CMML of both variables, we implemented a model for predicting time to CMML: 0 points (none of them), 1 (one of them) or 2 points (both). This model offered an excellent predictive power (C-index: 0.82).CONCLUSIONS1. The clinical outcomes of OM-CMML support its consideration as the first step in the proliferative continuum of CMML.2. OM-CMML with higher molecular complexity and higher relative monocytosis are at greater risk of CMML evolution. [Display omitted] DisclosuresBellosillo: Thermofisher Scientific: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Qiagen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Characterization of Indolent Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Phenotypes and Identification of Dynamic Disease Features of Progression and Need for Treatment

Characterization of Indolent Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Phenotypes and Identification of Dynamic Disease Features of Progression and Need for Treatment

Colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor gene (CSF3R) T618I mutated chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: A proliferative subtype with a distinct mutational profile

Abstract Introduction/Objective Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm characterized by sustained monocytosis, ranging from cytopenia with a dysplastic subtype to leukocytosis with a proliferative subtype, with a typical mutational profile involving TET2, ASXL1, and SRSF2. Mutation in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor gene (CSF3R) is commonly associated with chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) but exceedingly rare in CMML, particularly CSF3R T618I (~10 cases described, ~30 cases of CSF3R non-T618I mutations). We report a case of CSF3R T618I mutated CMML and compare the clinicopathologic features to reported CMML cases with and without CSF3R T618I mutations. Methods/Case Report A 27-year-old woman presented for evaluation of leukocytosis, sustained monocytosis, and anemia. Peripheral blood (PB) revealed leukocytosis (white cell count 35x109/L), left-shifted and dysplastic neutrophils (myelocytes and metamyelocytes, 5%), absolute and relative monocytosis (7x109/L, 29%), anemia (Hgb 4.3 g/dL), and thrombocytopenia. Bone marrow aspirate and core biopsy demonstrated a hypercellular marrow with increased myeloblasts (~3%, immunophenotypically aberrant by flow cytometry), increased myelomonocytic cells, and multilineage dysplasia, including ring sideroblasts and hypolobated megakaryocytes. Cytogenetic and molecular studies revealed a normal karyotype and mutations in CSF3R T618I, ASXL1, SETBP1, BCORL1, KRAS, and PTPN11. Despite the presence of a CSF3R T618I mutation, CMML was diagnosed given marked monocytosis, left- shifted neutrophils in PB, multilineage dysplasia, and immunophenotypically aberrant myeloblasts. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion Our case demonstrates clinicopathological features similar to those of reported CSF3R T618I mutated CMML, i.e., a proliferative subtype and less likely to have co-occurring mutations in TET2 or SRSF2, which is distinct from CSF3R non-T618I mutated CMML; the latter often has a dysplastic subtype and mutational profile of frequent TET2 and SRSF2 mutations, similar to CSF3R unmutated CMML. While additional cases with this unusual mutation need to be studied to arrive at a more definitive conclusion, the CSF3R T618I mutation seems to define a unique proliferative subtype CMML with a distinct mutational profile.

Extramedullary Manifestations in World Health Organization-Defined Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia: Clinical, Molecular and Prognostic Correlates

Background:Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is an aggressive myeloid neoplasm with overlapping myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic features. Extramedullary manifestations (EMM) include splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy, leukemia cutis, gingival infiltrates, central nervous system (CNS) and testicular involvement and myeloid sarcomas. We carried out this study to i) define clinical and laboratory correlates of EMM in CMML, ii) to assess the prognostic impact of EMM, and iii) to document survival outcomes.Methods:Four hundred and fifty-two patients with WHO-defined CMML were included in the study. All morphological and cytogenetic assessments at baseline were performed at the Mayo Clinic, MN. Bone marrow (BM) DNA at diagnosis was available in 229 (50%) patients and was subjected to a 29 gene panel next generation sequencing analysis. EMM for the purpose of this study were defined as: palpable splenomegaly, palpable hepatomegaly, palpable lymphadenopathy, clinical/radiological or biopsy proven leukemia cutis, gingival infiltrates, testicular involvement, CNS involvement, and myeloid sarcomas. EMM were included if present either at the time of CMML diagnosis, or within six months of stable disease following diagnosis. Standard statistical tests and measures were utilized.Results:Three hundred and seventy-three (82%) patients had an exam documented at the time of diagnosis, or within six months of diagnosis, and were included in the analysis. The median age was 69 years (range, 18-95), 66% were male and 176 (47%) had a “proliferative CMML phenotype.”1. Clinical correlates:One hundred and nineteen (32%) patients had at least one EMM at diagnosis. This included; palpable splenomegaly 91 (76%), hepatomegaly 48 (40%), lymphadenopathy 19 (15%), leukemia cutis 7 (6%), gingival infiltrates 4 (3%), myeloid sarcomas 2 (2%), and 1 each with testicular and CNS involvement (1%). Thirty two (27%) had non hepatosplenic EMM, 102 (86%) had palpable hepato and/or splenomegaly, whereas 54 (45%) and 11 (9%) had isolated palpable splenomegaly and hepatomegaly. In comparison to CMML patients without EMM, those with, were more likely to be younger (p <0.0001), have a higher leukocyte count (WBC, p <0.0001), higher absolute neutrophil count (ANC, p <0.0001), higher absolute monocyte count (AMC, p <0.0001), have circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC, p <0.0001), have mutations involving ASXL1 (p 0.03), CBL (p 0.04), and CSF3R (p 0.02), lack SF3B1 (p 0.009) and ZRSR2 (p 0.03) mutations and have a higher risk stratification by the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM, p<0.0001) and the GFM model (p=0.004).2. Prognostic impact:At last follow up (median 14 months), 249 (67%) deaths and 69 (18%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survival (OS) was 13 months for patients with non hepatosplenic EMM, 13.2 months for those with palpable hepatosplenomegaly, and 25 months for those without EMM (Figure 1). On univariate analysis, survival was adversely affected by, male sex (p 0.03), low hemoglobin (p <0.0001), high WBC (p 0.0005), high AMC (p <0.0001), presence of IMC (p 0.002), circulating blast % (p <0.0001), high LDH (p 0.0004), presence of EMM (p <0.0001), palpable hepatosplenomegaly (p=0.0008), leukemia cutis (p=0.02), proliferative CMML phenotype (p <0.0001), adverse cytogenetics (p 0.003), absence of TET2 (p 0.0004) and the presence of DNMT3A (p 0.002), IDH1 (p 0.013), ASXL1 (p 0.03), and Tp53 (p 0.014) mutations. Non-hepatosplenic EMM, palpable lymphadenopathy, CNS, testicular involvement and the presence of myeloid sarcomas did not impact OS. On multivariate analysis, only male sex (p= 0.009, HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), low hemoglobin (p <0.0001, HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.3-2.3), palpable hepatosplenomegaly (p 0.0005, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.04-2.2), absence of TET2 mutations (p 0.023, HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.95), and the presence of DNMT3A mutations (p 0.013, HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3) retained an independent negative prognostic impact. Palpable hepatosplenomegaly retained prognostic significance when assessed in the context of the MMM (p=0.03) and the GFM (p=0.04) models. EMM had no impact on leukemia-free survival.Conclusion:The current study demonstrates a prognostically-relevant frequent occurrence of hepatosplenomegaly in CMML; the study also provides the spectrum and frequency of extramedullary manifestations and correlations with mutations. [Display omitted] DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

RAS mutations drive proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia via a KMT2A-PLK1 axis

Proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (pCMML), an aggressive CMML subtype, is associated with dismal outcomes. RAS pathway mutations, mainly NRASG12D, define the pCMML phenotype as demonstrated by our exome sequencing, progenitor colony assays and a Vav-Cre-NrasG12D mouse model. Further, these mutations promote CMML transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Using a multiomics platform and biochemical and molecular studies we show that in pCMML RAS pathway mutations are associated with a unique gene expression profile enriched in mitotic kinases such as polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). PLK1 transcript levels are shown to be regulated by an unmutated lysine methyl-transferase (KMT2A) resulting in increased promoter monomethylation of lysine 4 of histone 3. Pharmacologic inhibition of PLK1 in RAS mutant patient-derived xenografts, demonstrates the utility of personalized biomarker-driven therapeutics in pCMML.

Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: a focused review.

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap syndromes are unique myeloid neoplasms, with overlapping features of MDS and MPN. They consist of four adult onset entities including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts-thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), BCR-ABL1 negative atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U); with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) being the only pediatric onset entity. Among these overlap neoplasms, CMML is the most frequent and is hallmarked by the presence of sustained peripheral blood monocytosis with recurrent mutations involving TET2 (60%), SRSF2 (50%) and ASXL1 (40%); with RAS pathway mutations and JAK2V617F being relatively enriched in proliferative CMML subtypes (WBC ≥13 × 109/L). CMML usually presents in the 7th decade of life, with a male preponderance and is associated with a median overall survival of <36 months. Adverse prognosticators in CMML include increasing age, high WBC, presence of circulating immature myeloid cells, anemia, thrombocytopenia and truncating ASXL1 mutations. While allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option, given the late onset of this neoplasm and high frequency of comorbidities, most patients remain ineligible. Hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine, decitabine and oral decitabine/cedazuridine have been US FDA approved for the management of CMML, with overall response rates of 40-50% and complete remission rates of <20%. While these agents epigenetically restore hematopoiesis in a subset of responding patients, they do not impact mutational allele burdens and eventual disease progression to AML remains inevitable. Newer treatment modalities exploiting epigenetic, signaling and splicing abnormalities commonly seen in CMML are much needed.

Outcomes of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) after Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Failure

Outcomes of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) after Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Failure

Decitabine Versus Hydroxyurea for Advanced Proliferative CMML: Results of the Emsco Randomized Phase 3 Dacota Trial

Decitabine Versus Hydroxyurea for Advanced Proliferative CMML: Results of the Emsco Randomized Phase 3 Dacota Trial

MPN-379: Interim Results from an Ongoing Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial of Tagraxofusp, a CD123-Targeted Therapy, in Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) with poor outcomes, particularly in the relapsed/ refractory (R/R) setting. Current FDA-approved therapies have limited clinical impact. Clinical outcomes appear particularly poor in patients with proliferative features (high WBC counts, splenomegaly, high symptom burden) and high-risk cytogenetic and/or genomic features. Tagraxofusp (TAG) targets CD123, a biomarker expressed on CMML blasts and clonal monocytes; additionally, there is evidence of microenvironmental clonal plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Collectively, these features provide a rationale to assess the role of TAG in CMML patients. Objectives: To assess safety and efficacy of TAG in patients with CMML refractory/resistant/intolerant to HMAs, hydroxyurea, or intensive chemotherapy. Methods: Multicenter Phase 1/2 trial with TAG being administered as a daily IV infusion at 7, 9, or 12 mcg/kg on days 1–3 every 21 days (cycle 1-4), 28 days (cycles 5-7), and 42 days (cycles 8+) in stage 1 and 12 mcg/kg in stage 2. Results: Twenty-nine patients, including CMML-1 [n=19] and CMML-2 [n=10]; the median age was 70 years (range 42–87). Thirteen patients (45%) had baseline splenomegaly (spleen palpable below the left costal margin [BCM]); nine of these patients had baseline splenomegaly ≥5 cm BCM. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs, incidence ≥25%) were hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The most common ≥ grade 3 TRAEs were thrombocytopenia (34%), anemia (17%), and nausea (3%). Capillary leak syndrome was reported in seven patients (4 with grade 1–2; 3 with grade 3). Three patients, all with splenomegaly at baseline, achieved complete bone marrow responses (BMCRs), including one patient who was allografted in CR. Of note, two of these three BMCRs had proliferative CMML with high-risk cytogenetic and genomic features. Analysis of clinical benefit demonstrated a clinical reduction in splenomegaly in all patients with baseline splenomegaly (14/14): 71% (10/14) had spleen size reduction of ≥50%, and 60% (6/10) with baseline spleen size ≥5 cm had spleen size reduction of ≥50%. Conclusions: The interim results represent the clinical efficacy and safety of TAG monotherapy in a cohort of CMML patients, including patients with splenomegaly, a recognized poor prognostic factor in CMML. ( NCT02268253 )

Clinical Categorization of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia into Proliferative and Dysplastic Subtypes Correlates with Distinct Genomic, Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Signatures

Introduction: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), an aggressive myeloid malignancy, can be categorized into two subtypes, proliferative CMML (pCMML) and dysplastic (dCMML), based on a white blood cell (WBC) count of ≥ 13 x 109/L for the former (Arber et al. Blood 2016). While this WBC cut off is somewhat arbitrary, patients with pCMML have unique phenotypic features and a shorter survival. We carried out this study to assess the genomic, transcriptomic and epigenetic landscapes of these two CMML subtypes. Methods: Peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells (MNC) were obtained from WHO-defined CMML patients. Next generation sequencing (NGS) using a 36-gene panel was performed on 350 patients with Illumina HiSeq4000 platform with median read depth of 400X. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on 25 patients by bulk whole transcriptome sequencing using Illumina TruSeq. DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (DIP-seq) was performed on 18 patients using 5-methylcystocine (5mC), 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and bridging monoclonal antibodies with subsequent paired-end sequencing using HiSeq4000. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) was performed on 30 patients with Illumina HiSeq2500 to a depth of 25 million for histone 3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1) and histone 3 lysine 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) and 50 million reads for histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and Input per sample. Results: Five hundred and seventy-three patients with WHO defined CMML were included; median age 71 years (range 18-95 years), 67% males. 282 patients had pCMML (49%), while 291 (51%) had dCMML. As pre-defined, patients with pCMML were more likely to have higher absolute monocyte counts (p&lt;0.0001), circulating immature myeloid cells (p&lt;0.0001), PB blasts (p&lt;0.0001), and higher lactate dehydrogenase levels (p=0.03). At last follow up 234 (41%) deaths and 70 (20%) leukemic transformations were documented. The median OS for pCMML vs dCMML in this cohort was 19 months vs 30 months (p&lt;0.0001, Figure 1A) and validated in an independent Austrian cohort (p=0.02). Genomic profiling: NGS performed on 350 patients (BM MNC) revealed a higher frequency of NRAS (35 vs 17%, p=0.004), cumulative RAS pathway (NRAS, KRAS, CBL and PTPN11) (73 vs 47%, p=0.001), ASXL1 (p=0.003) and JAK2V617F (p=0.04) mutations in pCMML relative to dCMML (Figure 1B); while dCMML had a higher frequency of SF3B1 mutations (p=0.02). There were no differences in distribution of TET2 and SRSF2Transcriptomic analysis: RNA-seq was performed on PB MNC from RAS pathway mutant pCMML patients (n=12) and RAS pathway wildtype dCMML patients (n=13). Unsupervised clustering analysis resulted in appropriate segregation revealing distinct expression profiles between disease subtypes (Figure 1C). Compared to dCMML, 3729 genes were significantly differentially upregulated and 2658 genes were differentially downregulated in pCMML. Among genes most highly upregulated were mitotic checkpoint kinases including AURBK, PLK1, PLK2, PLK4 andEpigenetic profiling: ChIP-seq of PB and BM MNC from pCMML (n=18) and dCMML (n=12) patients and healthy, age-matched controls (n=10) revealed a global increase in H3K4me1, without significant differences in H3K4me3 or H3K27me3 occupancies (regardless of stratification by ASXL1 mutational status; 40% ASXL1mt in pCMML, 30% dCMML) in pCMML vs dCMML (Figure 1D). H3K4me1 occupancy was also increased in a sequence-specific manner at the transcription start sites of the aforementioned mitotic kinases (PLK1 and WEE1). DIP-seq was performed on PB MNC to assess global differences in 5-mC and 5-hmC levels, between pCMML (n=9) and dCMML (n=9), with no differences seen between the two subtypes (regardless of TET2 mutational status, 40% TET2mt in each subtype) (Figure 1E). Conclusions: Despite the somewhat arbitrary WBC distinction between pCMML and dCMML, clear phenotypic, genetic, transcriptomic, epigenetic and survival differences exist between the two subtypes, providing strong biological rationale for this distinction. pCMML patients have a higher frequency of oncogenic RAS pathway mutations, a unique transcriptomic profile enriched in mitotic check point kinases and a unique chromatin configuration with global and sequence specific enrichment in H3K4me1, with no significant global differences in 5mC, 5hmC, or H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 occupancy. Figure 1 Disclosures Geissler: AOP: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Ratiopharm: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phenotypic Characterization of Leukemia-Initiating Stem Cells in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a stem cell-derived hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by dysplasia, uncontrolled expansion of monocytic (progenitor) cells in the bone marrow (BM) and in the peripheral blood (PB), and an increased risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients with advanced CMML and sAML are often highly resistant to therapy and their prognosis is dismal. It is thought that drug resistance in myeloid malignancies is a quality of leukemia stem cells (LSC), but little is known about CMML-initiating and propagating LSC. We investigated the phenotype and functional behavior of putative CMML-initiating cells in 15 patients with CMML (7 females, 8 males; median age 73 years; range 45-82 years) and 6 with sAML following CMML (1 female, 5 males; median age 67.5 years; range 66-76 years). BM and/or PB samples were examined by multicolor flow cytometry using antibodies against CD34, CD38 and various additional surface markers and target antigens. In a subset of patients, putative stem and progenitor cells (CD34+ cells, CD34+/CD38─ cells and CD34+/CD38+ cells) were FACS-sorted to high purity (&gt;95%) and were employed in xenotransplantation experiments or in drug testing experiments. We found that CMML-initiating and propagating LSC reside within the CD34+/CD38─ fraction of the malignant clone. Whereas highly purified CD34+ cells engrafted NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl Tg(CMV-IL3,CSF2,KITLG) 1Eav/MloySzJ (NSGS) mice with full-blown CMML (engraftment rate 44.8±26.0%), no CMML was produced by the bulk of CD34- monocytic cells (engraftment rate 0.8±0.5%; p=0.002). CMML engraftment was also detectable when transplanting unselected mononuclear cells (engraftment rate 19.7±10.9%). By contrast, no leukemic engraftment was produced by CD38+ CMML fractions (engraftment rate 0.1±0.1%; p=0.003), indicating that the NSGS-repopulating CMML LSC reside specifically in a CD34+/CD38- fraction of the clone. In sAML, both the CD34+/CD38- cell fraction (engraftment rate 92.2±6.2%) and the CD34+/CD38+ fraction (engraftment rate 80.5±7.2%) produced engraftment with AML blasts in NSGS mice. In a next step, we established the cell surface phenotype of CD34+/CD38- LSC in CMML and sAML. As assessed by multicolor flow cytometry, CD34+/CD38- CMML cells invariably expressed CD33/Siglec-3, CD117/KIT, CD123/IL3RA, CD133/AC133, CD135/FLT3, and IL-1RAP. In a subset of patients, CMML LSC also expressed CD52 (9/11 patients; 81%), CD114 (3/7 patients; 43%), CD184 (9/12 patients; 75%), CD221 (8/11 patients; 73%) and/or CLL-1 (7/13 patients; 54%). CMML LSC did not express CD25 or CD26. However, in patients with sAML, LSC also displayed CD25 (median fluorescence intensity, MFI: CMML: 0.9 vs. sAML: 23.0; p&lt;0.001). Compared to hematopoietic stem cells in normal BM (NBM), CMML LSC displayed slightly increased levels of CD117/KIT (MFI CMML: 32.5 vs. MFI NBM: 15.0; p=0.019), CD135/FLT3 (MFI CMML: 1.9 vs. MFI NBM: 0.8; p=0.001), CD184/CXCR4 (MFI CMML: 1.6 vs. MFI NBM 0.9; p=0.027), and IL-1RAP (MFI CMML: 1.6 vs. MFI NBM: 0.8; p=0.004). No correlations between surface-marker expression on LSC and the type of CMML (CMML-0/1/2 or dysplastic vs. proliferative CMML) or the clinical course were found. To confirm the clinical relevance of expression of surface target antigens on CMML LSC, we applied the CD33-targeted drug gemtuzumab-ozogamicin (GO). As assessed by combined staining for LSC (CD34+/CD38-) and AnnexinV/DAPI, incubation of CMML LSC with GO (0.001-1 µg/ml) resulted in dose-dependent apoptosis in all donors tested, and the same result was obtained in the monoblastic cell lines THP-1 (GO at 1 µg/ml: 94.2±1.5% vs. control: 12.7±2.2%, p&lt;0.05) and Mono-Mac-1 (GO at 1 µg/ml: 56.4±12.1% vs. control: 10.1±0.6% p&lt;0.05). In conclusion, LSC in CMML and sAML reside within CD34+/CD38─ cell populations that express distinct profiles of surface markers and target antigens. During progression of CMML into sAML, LSC apparently acquire CD25. Characterization of CMML LSC and LSC in sAML should facilitate their enrichment and the development of LSC-eradicating therapies. Disclosures Hoermann: Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Sperr:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Sill:Astex: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Other: Advisory board. Geissler:Novartis: Honoraria; AOP: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Ratiopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Deininger:Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; TRM: Consultancy; Sangoma: Consultancy; Adelphi: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humana: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sangamo: Consultancy. Valent:Pfizer: Honoraria; Blueprint: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Deciphera: Honoraria, Research Funding.