Prolapse And Hemorrhoids Research Articles

Anatomical Anal Stenosis after PPH: Insights from a Retrospective Study and Rat Model.

High-grade hemorrhoids are usually recommended to receive operational treatments. However, these traditional surgeries are associated with severe postoperative pain. A procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH), a circular staple device, has been developed to improve short-term outcomes, including reducing the severity of postoperative pain. PPH, compared to conventional surgery, has been associated with the incidence of anatomical anal stenosis. The causes of stenosis after PPH are not yet clear. We first analyzed the complications of our patients with PPH, and then developed a rat model to verify the tension force of PPH using Hematoxylin-eosin, Masson's trichrome, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence staining. Our clinical data showed that PPH significantly improved postoperative pain, but that it resulted in higher incidences of complications, including anal stenosis, than hemorrhoidectomy. We simulated the status of PPH and developed a rat model to verify PPH's tension force, including the scarring area and the deposition of proinflammatory factors, angiogenic factors, and fibrotic factors. The tension wound histological data showed more extensive granulation tissue and inflammatory cell infiltration and a thicker epidermis than the control group on day 12 post-operation and tension treatment. In addition to IL-1β and IL-10 cytokines on day 3 and IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 cytokines on day 12 post-operation in the tension group, two angiogenic factors, CD31 and VEGF-A, were found to have a more significant expression on day 7 post-operation in the tension group. The mean scar area was larger and the distribution of fibrotic proteins (collagen 1, α-SMA, CTGF, and MMP2) in the tension group was significantly broader than in the control on day 12 post-operation and tension treatment. Based on the findings of our animal model, the development of a lesser tensile force for PPH to decrease the deposition of proinflammatory factors, angiogenic factors, and fibrotic factors is urgently required.

Clinical efficacy of ultrasound doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in treatment of severe hemorrhoids.

Hemorrhoids are a prevalent anorectal condition that affects a wide range of adult populations. The severity of this condition was graded using a validated hemorrhoidal grading system, specifically focusing on grade III and IV cases. This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of a standard Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) with a combined Doppler-guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL) and a PPH approach in patients with severe hemorrhoids. Conducted from May 2021 to January 2023, the study included patients aged 18-65 with confirmed diagnosis of Grade III or Grade IV hemorrhoids. Patients with a history of anorectal surgery and significant comorbidities were excluded. The control group underwent standard PPH, whereas the observation group received DG-HAL followed by PPH. Clinical outcomes were measured using variables such as the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative wound healing time, and length of hospital stay. Efficacy was evaluated using a hierarchical scale and a visual analog scale (VAS) for postoperative pain. The complication rates were also assessed. baseline characteristics were homogeneous between the 2 groups. The observation group demonstrated significantly faster postoperative wound healing and shorter hospital stay (P < .01). The overall therapeutic efficacy in the observation group was 90.0%, which was higher than that of the control group (75.0%; P = .025). The VAS pain scores were also significantly lower in the observation group (P = .002). A marked decrease in complication rates was observed in the observation group (3.3%) compared with that in the control group (17.9%) (P < .05). The combined DG-HAL and PPH surgical approach exhibited superior clinical efficacy in treating severe hemorrhoids. This technique offers high effectiveness, reduced postoperative VAS pain scores, and lower complication rates. The long-term efficacy requires further observation.

Tarlov cyst with self-healing cauda equina syndrome following combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case report

BackgroundCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) after Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia (CSEA) is a rare disease that most of the time need surgery to relieve spinal cord compression.Case presentationA 34-year-old male patient underwent a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) under CSEA. Anesthesia and surgery were uneventful. However, the patient gradually experienced urinary retention, lower abdomen and back pain, changes in bowel habits and neurological dysfunction of the lower limbs when the catheter was removed. It was later determined that the patient had Tarlov cyst at the left S1 level in the sacral canal. Finally, the patient completely recovered 20 days after drug conservative therapy onset.ConclusionThis case suggests that CES might occur even after ordinary CSEA. The risk factors are drug neurotoxicity to ropivacaine and Tarlov cyst, which helped to accumulate ropivacaine. The development of ultrasound-guided CSEA and an ultrasound atlas of the spinal canal are required.

Prevention and Treatment of Anastomotic Strictures After Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids.

Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH), also known as circular stapled hemorrhoidectomy, is a common method of treating hemorrhoids due to its low risk of complications and minimal postoperative pain. Several complications have appeared alongside the rise of treated cases, however, and this has led to a progressive slowing of the clinical use of PPH in recent years. Anastomotic stenosis is one of the most common complications of PPH, but the greater amount of tissue removed and the speed with which it can heal make it the best choice for patients with severe prolapsed annular hemorrhoids or rectal mucosal prolapse. Therefore, academics continue to comprehensively study PPH to take advantage of annular resection and reduce complications. In this paper, we analyzed the causes, intraoperative warnings, and postoperative therapy of anastomotic stenosis induced by PPH, with an eye toward scientific application in the anorectal field, based on the experience of clinical applications.

Electroacupuncture at Baliao point alleviates post-operative pain and anal distension after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy): a prospective randomized clinical trial

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) at Baliao point on short-term complications, such as anal pain and swelling, after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsA total of 124 eligible patients undergoing PPH surgery were included in this study and randomly divided into a control group (n = 67) and an EA group (n = 57), with patients in the control group receiving only PPH surgery and patients in the EA group receiving PPH surgery and EA at Baliao point.ResultsThe visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of EA group at 8, 24, 48, and 72 h after operation were significantly lower than those of control group. The anal distension scores at 8, 48, and 72 h after operation were also significantly lower than those of control group. The number of postoperative analgesic drug administration per patient was also significantly lower in the EA group. The incidence of urinary retention and tenesmus in EA group was significantly lower than that in control group within the first day after surgery.ConclusionEA treatment at the Baliao point can alleviate short-term anal pain and anal swelling after the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids, reduce the incidence of urinary retention, and decrease the use of postoperative analgesic drugs.Trial registrationThis study was approved and registered by the Chinese Clinical Trial Center, Registration number: ChiCTR2100043519, Registration time: February 21, 2021 (https://www.chictr.org.cn/).

Bandwagons in colorectal surgery.

Surgery, like other fields of medicine, has not been spared by a number of unfortunate phenomena. Although our perception may point at recent times, some trends can actually be traced back to 1979. Cohen and Rothschild stated that even when medical progress is extraordinary, the path has too often been driven by overwhelming acceptance of popular albeit unproven ideas. These are referred to as bandwagons. Some of such ideas were eventually proven as valid, but more often were abandoned and/or replaced by new bandwagons. In the specific case of colorectal surgery, there are at least five currently ongoing bandwagons: 1) laparoscopic lavage of perforated colon; 2) laparoscopic ventral rectopexy; 3) stapled hemorrhoidopexy, also known as procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH); 4) watch and wait; 5) transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Preventing bandwagons from taking off requires efforts at different levels: 1) innovators must constrain their self-interest of fame and rather recognize the need for establishing evidence to support their ideas; 2) new treatment modalities must be carefully weighed by sufficiently powered clinical trials prior to been implemented on patients; 3) the media should not mislead patients into the "best" treatment without reliable evidence; 4) physicians should keep in mind that the process of innovation in medicine is slow and disregard the temptation to accept at face value perhaps plausible, yet unproven ideas.

The Clinical Effect and Mechanism of Prostant on Urinary Retention and Anal Pain.

Anal pain and urinary retention are the two most outstanding complications of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) surgery. This study intended to assess the clinical effect and mechanism of Prostant on urinary retention and anal pain after the PPH. Here, 30 patients received PPH surgery. The role and mechanism of Prostant in patients and mice with urinary retention and anal pain were evaluated. ANOVA tests were executed and differences between groups were regarded as statistically significant when p < 0.05. Prostant effectively improved the urination status, lower abdomen symptoms, time to urinate and score of VAS, and the reduction of TNF-α and IL-6. Similarly, Prostant can ameliorate the outcome of urodynamics in urinary retention mice. Mechanically, Prostant reversed the urinary retention-elevated the serum level of hs-CRP and TNF-α, reduction of IL-2, imbalance of Treg/Th17, and level of JAK2 and phosphorylated STAT3. Besides, Prostant ameliorated the pain as shown by the reduction of writhing response, and the elevation of threshold of pain and degree of swelling. Moreover, Prostant antagonized the pain-induced dysregulation of Treg/Th17. Therefore, Prostant can treat patients and mice with anal pain and urinary retention by modulating the balance of Th17/Treg to regulate the secretion and production of inflammatory factors. We hope our results can establish a scientific treatment approach for solving anal pain and urinary retention after PPH surgery of mixed hemorrhoids.

Tissue-selecting-technique mega-window stapler combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation in prolapsed hemorrhoids

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the efficiency of these two combined surgeries [prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) combined with the external hemorrhoidectomy and inferior internal hemorrhoid ligation; tissue selecting technique with mega-window stapler (TST-MS) combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation]. MethodsThis is a single-center, evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 204 participants were randomly divided into the two groups. The anal function, reoccurrence, intraoperative variables, and operative complications were assessed. The measurement data were compared by paired t test and rank sum test. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test was used for count data and rank sum test for ranked data. To assess differences within each group in different time points, the repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted. ResultsTST-MS combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation had lower Wexner score of anal incontinence (Z = 3.062, P = 0.002), higher patients’ satisfaction degree (t = 7.32, P < 0.001), less residual skin tags (χ2 = 18.141, P < 0.001), longer operative time (Z = −2.281, P = 0.023), and bigger volume of excised rectal mucosa (t = 2.35, P = 0.020). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the anal canal circumference, recurrence, intraoperative blood loss, weight of excised rectal mucosa, anal pain, bleeding, urinary retention, anal edge edema, and anatomical anal stenosis (all P > 0.05). ConclusionsTST-MS combined with anal canal epithelial preservation operation showed better clinical efficiency in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoids. Trial registrationThis study has been registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000038533)

Analgesic Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Hydromorphone following Surgery for Mixed Hemorrhoids: A Pilot Study

Background Postoperative pain is a major adverse effect of surgery for mixed hemorrhoids. We evaluated whether spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine and hydromorphone provided safe and effective analgesia after surgery for mixed hemorrhoids. Methods This single-center, double-blind pilot study included patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and external hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia at Zhejiang Hospital, China (October 2020 to December 2020). Patients were randomized to a hydromorphone group (spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine and 75 μg hydromorphone) or morphine group (spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine and 150 μg morphine). Pain scores (numerical rating scale), incidences of vomiting and itching, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were recorded at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after surgery. Results The analysis included 40 patients in each group. Median (interquartile range) pain score in the hydromorphone group was higher than that in the morphine group at 12 hours (1 (0–2] vs. 0 (0–2), p=0.044) but not significantly different between groups at 6 hours (0 (0–1) vs. 0 (0-0) p=0.228), 18 hours (2 (2–3) vs. 2 (1–3) p=0.060) or 24 hours (2 (2–3) vs. 2 (1–3) p=0.081). The hydromorphone group had a lower incidence of pruritus than the morphine group (47.5% vs. 67.5%, p=0.018). There were no significant differences between groups in vomiting incidence or LoS. Conclusion In patients with mixed hemorrhoids, spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine/hydromorphone has a comparable analgesic effect and a lower incidence of pruritus during the first 24 hours after surgery than spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine/morphine.

LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy versus the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background:LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) are both relatively new treatments for managing symptomatic hemorrhoids. This review aimed to evaluate and compare their short-term outcomes.Methods:We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database for randomized controlled trials comparing the LigaSure procedure and PPH published in any language from 1998 to October 2013.Results:A total of 5 studies involving 397 participants were included in this review. Pooled analysis showed that the LigaSure procedure was associated with significantly lower recurrence rate [relative risk (RR) = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06 to 0.72, P = .01] and significantly shorter operating time [mean difference (MD) = −6.39, 95% CI: −7.68 to −5.10, P < .001]. The analysis showed no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two techniques (MD = 0.55, 95% CI: −0.15 to 1.25, P = .12] or in time off work or away from normal activity [standard MD = 0.13, 95% CI: −1.80 to 2.06, P = .9]. The two techniques did not show significant differences in postoperative complications or other patient-related outcomes (P > .05).Conclusions:Our review indicates that both LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and PPH are safe alternatives for the management of hemorrhoids. Available evidence suggests that the LigaSure technique is associated with shorter operating time and lower hemorrhoid recurrence rate, but these conclusions should be further confirmed in large, multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.

Effect of Kangfuxin Solution Fumigation Bath on Postoperative Patients with Hemorrhoid PPH and Influence on the Postoperative Complications.

Surgery is now the main clinical treatment for hemorrhoids, and the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) is the commonly used procedure. The key to evaluating the efficacy of surgery includes the quality of postoperative wound healing and the occurrence of complications, so it is especially important to enhance the postoperative rehabilitation of hemorrhoids. This study investigates the method of postoperative treatment with Kangfuxin solution fumigation bath to explore the role of this method in the efficacy of patients after hemorrhoid PHH surgery and its effect on postoperative complications. It will accumulate some relevant information to improve the efficacy of hemorrhoid surgery and postoperative complications and open new ideas for further postoperative rehabilitation of other diseases in the anal area. A total of 106 patients with hemorrhoids were included in this study, all of whom were treated with PHH surgery. After surgery, they were randomly divided into a control group treated with warm water sitz bath and an observation group treated with Kangfuxin solution fumigation bath, with 53 cases in each group. We observed all patients' postoperative pain, bleeding, and perianal edema on a daily basis after surgery; we recorded the time of wound healing and hospital stay. The maximum anal squeeze pressure (MASP), anal defecation diastole pressure (ADDP), anal resting pressure (ARP), and the length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ) were used as observation indicators to evaluate the anal function of the patients before and after treatment. The results of the evaluation of the efficacy of patients after the treatment period showed that the total effective rate of treatment in the observation group (92.45%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (77.36%). The postoperative recovery showed that the wound healing time, hospitalization time, pain, bleeding, and edema scores at 3 and 5 days after surgery were lower in the observation group than in the control group; MASP and ARP increased in both groups after treatment compared to before treatment, with more increase in the observation group. The results suggest that patients with hemorrhoids after PPH should pay attention to postoperative care and rehabilitation. It also reveals that the application of Kangfuxin solution fumigation treatment has a significant effect, which can effectively reduce the patient's wound healing and hospital stay, while improving the patient's anal function and reducing postoperative complications, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Effect of ERAS Combined with Low-frequency Pulsed Electronic Bladder Therapy Instrument on Patients Who Received PPH

Objective: To assess effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument on patients who received procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH). Methods: rom January 2020 to December 2020, we collected valid data from 172 patients. According to the random number table method, the participants were divided into intervention group and control group, 86 cases in each group. We provided traditional nursing intervention to control group participants during non-surgery period. In addition, we provided ERAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument to intervention group participants. Result: intervention group had better outcome in time of first exhaust, time of activity out of bed, and time of hospital stay compare with control group, that the results were significantly different (p < 0.05). In degree of wound pain of patient, NRS scores in preoperative, six hours after surgery, and 24 hours after surgery were lower in intervention compare with control group, that the results were significantly different. Conclusion: RAS combined with low-frequency pulsed electronic bladder therapy instrument can reduce wound pain of patient, and it speeds patient recovery, promotes early urination after surgery, reduces the risk of urinary retention, and shortens the length of hospital stay.

Clinical study of use of large C suture in procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids for treatment of mixed hemorrhoids.

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical use of a large C suture in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) for treatment of mixed hemorrhoids.MethodsPatients with mixed hemorrhoids (grade III or IV) who underwent treatment with a large C suture during PPH in the Affiliated Hospital (Group) of Putian University from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The incidences of anastomotic stenosis and anastomotic hemorrhage after the operation were observed.ResultsThe study population comprised 126 patients (46 men and 80 women) ranging in age from 30 to 78 years (mean, 46.1 ± 2.5 years). Of these patients, 60 had circular mixed hemorrhoids, 36 had grade III circular internal hemorrhoids, and 30 had grade IV circular internal hemorrhoids. The onset time among all patients ranged from 0.5 to 25 years. All patients underwent 6 months of postoperative follow-up. None of the patients with mixed hemorrhoids developed anastomotic stenosis, although two patients developed secondary anastomotic bleeding.ConclusionPlacement of a large C suture during PPH is a reliable technique for treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. It is simple, effective, and applicable and can be helpful for a large number of patients in primary hospitals.

Modified procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: Lower recurrence, higher satisfaction

BACKGROUNDHemorrhoidal prolapse is a common benign disease with a high incidence. The treatment procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) remains an operative method used for internal hemorrhoid prolapse. Although it is related to less pos-operative pain, faster recovery and shorter hospital stays, the postoperative recurrence rate is higher than that of the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH). We have considered that recurrence could be due to shortage of the pulling-up effect. This issue may be overcome by using lower purse-string sutures [modified-PPH (M-PPH)]. AIMTo compare the therapeutic effects and the patients’ satisfaction after M-PPH, PPH and MMH.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included 1163 patients (M-PPH, 461; original PPH, 321; MMH, 381) with severe hemorrhoids (stage III/IV) who were admitted to The 2nd Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2012 to 2014. Early postoperative complications, efficacy, postoperative anal dysfunction and patient satisfaction were compared among the three groups. Established criteria were used to assess short- and long-term postoperative complications. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate postoperative pain. Follow-up was conducted 5 years postoperatively.RESULTLength of hospital stay and operating time were significantly longer in the MMH group (8.05 ± 2.50 d, 19.98 ± 4.21 min; P < 0.0001) than in other groups. The incidence of postoperative anastomotic bleeding was significantly lower after M-PPH than after PPH or MMH (1.9%, 5.1% and 3.7%; n = 9, 16 and 14; respectively). There was a significantly higher rate of sensation of rectal tenesmus after M-PPH than after MMH or PPH (15%, 8% and 10%; n = 69, 30 and 32; respectively). There was a significantly lower rate of recurrence after M-PPH than after PPH (8.7% and 18.8%, n = 40 and 61; P < 0.0001). The incidence of postoperative anal incontinence differed significantly only between the MMH and M-PPH groups (1.3% and 4.3%, n = 5 and 20; P = 0.04). Patient satisfaction was significantly greater after M-PPH than after other surgeries.CONCLUSIONM-PPH has many advantages for severe hemorrhoids (Goligher stage III/IV), with a low rate of anastomotic bleeding and recurrence and a very high rate of patient satisfaction.M-PPH

Role of local infiltration of methylene blue as an analgesic in stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A prospective study

Background: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy gained popularity due to low postoperative pain. Few patients still complain of postoperative anal pain. Methylene blue (MB) in caudal and epidural anesthesia gives long-term pain relief and has also been used to treat intractable pruritus ani. Objective: Evaluate the role of local infiltration of the MB as an analgesic in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) surgery. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary health care center. Patients and Methods: Patients with grade-III hemorrhoids were included and were divided into two groups: A and B. Group A received a perianal injection of 2 mL of 1% MB with 10 mL of 25% bupivacaine. Group B received a perianal injection of 2 mL of normal saline with 10 mL of 25% bupivacaine. Main Outcome Measures: Patients were followed up prospectively for pain, hospital stay, and complications. Results were noted and compared between the two groups. Sample Size: 50 patients. Results: Group A had significantly lower pain scores on day 3 (mean ± SD 2.08 ± 1.08) and day 7 (mean ± SD 0.64 ± 0.95) as compared to the pain scores on day 3 (mean ± SD 3.92 ± 1.35) (P-value = 0.000) and day 7 (mean ± SD 2.40 ± 1.0) (P-value = 0.000) in group B. Pain scores within first 24 h and day 21 post-surgery were not statistically significant between groups A and B (P-value = 0.286 and 0.19, respectively). Group B required a significantly higher number of both injectable and oral analgesics (mean + SD 4.03 + 0.94) as compared to group A patients (mean + SD 1.97 + 0.81) (P-value = 0.001). 4% of the patients in group B had prolonged hospital stay due to severe pain. Patients in group A also had a significant reduction in their requirement of analgesics. None of the patients who received MB had any local or systemic allergic reactions. Conclusion: Local infiltration of MB may be used as an effective analgesic in PPH patients without any increase in morbidity. Limitations: Single-center study with a small sample size. Conflict of Interest: None.

Comparison of two different anesthesia methods for the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in elderly patients with anorectal diseases

Objective To compare the anesthetic effects of subarachnoid anesthesia(SA)and epidural anesthesia(EA)for the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)in elderly patients with benign anorectal diseases. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 60 patients with benign anorectal diseases admitted to Peking University Third Hospital from March to August 2018 and undergoing PPH.According to anesthesia methods, patients were divided into the SA group and the EA group (n=30 each). The level of sensory block was tested by acupuncture, and the degree of motor block was assessed by revised Bromage score.The anesthesia effect, operation time, blood loss, adverse events and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Results The highest level of sensory block was similar between the two groups without significant difference(P>0.05). The median onset time of sensory block was longer in the EA group [270.0 s(interquartile range, 66.3 s)] than in the SA group [25.5 s(interquartile range, 14.3 s)]. The revised Bromage score was lower in the EA group than in the SA group [1.0(interquartile range, 1.0)vs.2.0 (interquartile range, 1.0), Z=6.657, -1.685, both P=0.000]. The risks of hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and urinary retention were lower in the EA group than in the SA group (χ2=6.405, 4.286 and 4.403, P=0.011, 0.038 and 0.044). There were no significant differences in anesthetic effect, operation time, blood loss and hospitalization time between the two groups(all P>0.05). Conclusions EA can provide a perfect anesthesia and analgesic effect for elderly patients receiving PPH, with the advantages of rapid recovery of limb movement and low adverse events.As a substitute for SA, EA is a suitable anesthesia method for promoting the enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in patients with benign anorectal diseases. Key words: Anesthesia and analgesia; Anesthesia, epidural; Hemorrhoids

Efficacy of perioperative management in elderly hemorrhoids patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids

Objective To investigate the efficacy of perioperative management in elderly hemorrhoids patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH). Methods A total of 128 elderly patients treated with PPH in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University from February 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled and randomly divided into the routine group(n=64)and the intervention group(n=64). The routine group underwent routine postoperative management, and the intervention group received intervention postoperative management as add-on to routine postoperative management.Clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups. Results The frequency of constipation and hematochezia was less and the hospitalization days were shorter in the intervention group than in the routine group(0.8±0.6 times/d vs.1.2±0.4 times/d, 1.3±0.8 times/d vs.2.0±1.0 times/d, 4.9±1.1 days vs.7.4±1.3 days, t=4.438, 4.372 and 11.744 respectively, all P=0.000). The scores of visual analog scale(VAS)and geriatric depression scale(GDS)had no significant difference between the intervention and routine groups(5.0±1.6 scores vs.5.2±1.3 scores for VAS; 22.2±2.9 scores vs.22.5±2.6 scores for GDS, t=0.776 and 0.616, P=0.220 and 0.269)before intervention, and had significant difference between the intervention and routine groups[2.7±0.7 scores vs.3.2±1.1 scores for VAS; 17.2±1.8 scores vs.19.0±2.2 scores for GDS(t=3.068 and 5.066, P=0.001 and 0.000)]after intervention.The scores of quality of life, including physiological function, emotional function, social function, mental health and health status, were higher in the intervention group than in the routine group(all P<0.05). Conclusions Intervention perioperative management is effective in elderly hemorrhoids patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids.It can not only effectively improve clinical symptoms and shorten treatment time, but also alleviate pain and improve prognosis and quality of life. Key words: Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids; Hemorrhoids

A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Little is presently known on the impact of device type for Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation/mucopexy (DGHAL) or circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) when a surgical treatment is considered for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcome in terms of adverse events and recurrence rate, of patients included in the multicenter LigaLongo RCT ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01240772) according to the type of devices used. In the DGHAL arm (N = 193), the procedure was done with transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)™ (THD, Correggio, Italy) (104 patients) and with HAL-RAR™ (Agency for Medical Innovations (AMI) GmbH, Feldkirch, Austria) (89 patients). In the CSH arm (N = 184), procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)-03™ (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati OH) and hemorrhoidopexy and prolapse (HEM)™ (Covidien, Inc.) staplers were used in respectively 106 and 78 cases. Surgery-related morbidity at 90 postoperative days (POD) based on the Clavien-Dindo procedure-related complication score and clinical outcome in terms of recurrence and reoperation rate at 12 postoperative months (POM) was collected. Three hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomized according to HD grade. In the DGHAL arm, the number of ligations and mucopexies was higher in the AMI group (p < 0.0001); at 90 POD, the overall morbidity was similar between the two groups. In the CSH arm, donut sizes were similar; at 90 POD, the PPH group had a higher risk of postoperative grade 1 morbidity (anal urgency or incontinence) compared to the HEM group (p = 0.003). At 12 POM, no statistical difference was found between the two groups of each arm in terms of grade III recurrence or reoperation. Postoperative morbidity and outcome at 1year were similar regardless of the type of devices used. These findings suggest that device type has little impact on HD treatment results. clinicaltrials.gov -Identifier NCT01240772.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of multi-point umbrella suturing and single purse suturing with two-point traction after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) surgery

ObjectivesTo compare the clinical outcomes of multipoint umbrella suture and single-purse suture with two-point traction after procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids surgery (PPH) for the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. MethodsNinety patients were randomly divided into a PPH plus single-purse suture group (Group A) and a PPH plus multipoint umbrella suture (Group B). All operations were performed by an experienced surgeon. Operation time, width of the specimen, hemorrhoids retraction extent, postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, and length of hospitalization were recorded and compared. Statistical analysis was conducted by t-test and χ2 test. ResultsThere were no significant differences in sex, age, course of disease, and degree of prolapse of hemorrhoids between the two groups. The operative time in Group A was significantly shorter than that in Group B (P < 0.05). However, the incidence rates of submucosal hematoma and incomplete hemorrhoid core retraction were significantly lower in Group B (P < 0.05), whereas the width of the specimens in Group B was greater than that in Group A (P < 0.05). There were fewer redundant skin tags in Group B at three months follow-up. No significant difference in postoperative pain, postoperative bleeding, and time of hospital stay (P > 0.05 for all comparisons) was observed. ConclusionThe multipoint umbrella suture showed better clinical outcomes because of its targeted suture according to the extent of hemorrhoid prolapse.

A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of RPH With the Simplified Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids.

To explore the safety and efficacy of Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) or RPH with the simplified Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (sMMH) in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids. This is a randomized, controlled, balanced, multicenter study of 3000 patients with mixed hemorrhoids. The outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between 5 types of surgeries. The efficacy rate was the highest in patients who received RPH+sMMH and decreased in the following order: patients who received RPH alone, MMH alone, procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) alone, and PPH+sMMH ( P < .05). The operation time was the shortest in patients who received RPH alone and increased in the following order: patients who received RPH+sMMH, PPH alone, MMH alone, and PPH+sMMH ( P < .01). The duration of postoperative hospitalization stay was the shortest in patients who received RPH alone and increased in the following order: PPH alone, RPH+sMMH, PPH+sMMH, and MMH alone ( P < .01). The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage, uroschesis, anal fissure, crissum hematoma or thrombosis, and anorectal stenosis was significantly lower in patients who received RPH+sMMH than in patients who received the other 4 types of surgical treatments ( P < .05, P < .01). No significant differences in postoperative rectovaginal fistula and anal incontinence were observed between the 5 groups of patients. RPH with or without simplified MMH can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve the curative efficacy in the treatment of patients with mixed hemorrhoids.