ABSTRACT China has become a major host of transnational higher education. However, little research has examined how US-style liberal arts education (LAE) is packaged and practised in transnational universities in China. Guided by Phillips and Ochs’ education borrowing model and Marginson and Rhoades’ glonacal agency heuristic, this study examines how a US LAE model has been borrowed and ‘glonacalised’ in a transnational university (SFU) in China. Based on interviews with SFU’s students and staff, analysis of University Bulletin and other university published documents, the research identifies (mis)alignments between LAE-related discourse and practice at SFU in different borrowing stages. Findings show SFU has retained some explicit US LAE features (course structure, student-centred pedagogy and student agency), while more implicit principles were modified. The synergy among key glonacal actors/factors, namely neoliberal globalisation, neoliberal governance and students’ instrumental views of education, proved powerful in retaining and modifying the model.
Read full abstract