Progression Of Aortic Regurgitation Research Articles

Uncommon presentations of type A quadricuspid aortic valve in the Septuagenarian

BackgroundQuadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the presence of four cusps instead of the usual three. It is estimated to occur in less than 0.05% of the population, with Type A (four equal-sized leaflets) accounting for roughly 30% of QAV subtypes. Based on limited clinical series, the usual presentation is progressive aortic valve regurgitation (AR) with symptoms occurring in the fourth to sixth decade of life. Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and acute AR are very uncommon.Case presentationWe describe two cases of Type A QAV in patients who remained asymptomatic until their seventies with very uncommon presentations: one with severe AS and one with acute, severe AR and flail leaflet. In Case A, a 72-year-old patient with history of moderate AS presents to clinic with progressive exertional dyspnea. During work-up for transcatheter vs. surgical replacement pre-operative computed tomography angiogram (CTA) reveals a quadricuspid aortic valve with severe AS, and the patient undergoes surgical aortic valve replacement. Pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) shows good prosthetic valve function with no gradient or regurgitation. In Case B, a 76-year-old patient is intubated upon arrival to the hospital for acute desaturation, found to have wide open AR on catheterization, and transferred for emergent intervention. Intraoperative TEE reveals QAV with flail leaflet and severe AR. Repair is considered but deferred ultimately due to emergent nature. Post-operative TTE demonstrates good prosthetic valve function with no regurgitation and normal biventricular function.ConclusionsQAV can present as progressive severe AS and acute AR, with symptoms first occurring in the seventh decade of life. The optimal treatment for QAV remains uncertain. Although aortic valve repair or transcatheter option may be feasible in some patients, aortic valve replacement remains a tenable option.

The Challenges of Aortic Valve Management After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BackgroundContinuous retrograde flow across the aortic valve from left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy can result in cusp damage and progressive aortic regurgitation, potentially triggering recurrent heart and multiorgan failure. The management of aortic regurgitation after LVAD implantation has not been well defined. MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed the investigators’ experience with the management of de novo aortic regurgitation requiring intervention in patients with continuous-flow LVAD. ResultsSix patients who had undergone LVAD implantation and who required intervention were identified. Two patients underwent redo sternotomy with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, and 4 patients underwent percutaneous management, including Amplatzer device (Abbott) placement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. All patients had resolution of aortic regurgitation with improved hemodynamics and relief from heart failure. One early and 2 late deaths occurred. Valve function was intact, with all valves opening intermittently without greater than trivial aortic regurgitation. ConclusionsMultiple treatment modalities exist for LVAD-induced aortic valve regurgitation, including open surgical and percutaneous strategies. With a tailored risk-adjusted approach, acceptable results may be achieved.

Risk Factors of Long-Term Sequelae After Transcatheter Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect in Young Children.

Complications arising from transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD) in children, such as residual shunts and aortic regurgitation (AR), have been observed. However, the associated risk factors remain unclear. This study identified risk factors linked with residual shunts and AR following transcatheter closure of pmVSD in children aged 2-12 years.Methods and Results: The medical records of 63 children with pmVSD and a pulmonary-to-systemic blood flow ratio <2.0 who underwent transcatheter closure between 2011 and 2018 were analyzed with a minimum 3-year follow-up. The success rate of transcatheter closure was 98.4%, with no emergency surgery, permanent high-degree atrioventricular block, or mortality. Defects ≥4.5 mm had significantly higher odds of persistent residual shunt (odds ratio [OR] 6.85; P=0.03). The use of an oversize device (≥1.5 mm) showed a trend towards reducing residual shunts (OR 0.23; P=0.06). Age <4 years (OR 27.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.33-321.68) and perimembranous outlet-type VSD (OR 11.94, 95% CI 1.10-129.81) were independent risk factors for AR progression after closure. Careful attention is crucial for pmVSDs ≥4.5 mm to prevent persistent residual shunts in transcatheter closure. Assessing AR risk, particularly in children aged <4 years, is essential while considering the benefits of pmVSD closure.

Distinguishing sterile inflammation from graft infection

We describe the case of a 68-year-old man who underwent ascending aortic replacement and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Four years later, the patient developed neck pain on the right side and chest computed tomography showed expansion of fluid in the mediastinum which had extended to the neck. Echocardiography revealed advanced severity of aortic regurgitation and decreased ejection fraction. Given the progression of aortic regurgitation, decreased cardiac function, and rapidly expanding fluid accumulation causing neck pain, reoperation was indicated. All microbiological test including polymerase chain reaction were negative indicating absence of any infection. The patient is being followed-up without antibiotics and CT has not shown peri-graft fluid 2 years postoperatively. Since infection cannot be excluded completely, it is important to assess the condition with selective medium, extended culture periods, genetic testing, and consultations with microbiology laboratories when normal culture tests for general bacteria, and fungi are negative which can help avoid drug-resistant bacteria count, elevated medical costs, and drug side effects due to the improper use of antibiotics through proper diagnosis.

Long-term outcomes and risk factors for reoperation after subaortic stenosis resection in children and adults

Abstract Background Sub-valvular aortic stenosis (SAS) is an extremely heterogeneous form of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, which can lead to aortic valve damage. Although corrective surgery is considered the most effective treatment, rates of recurrence and reoperation are still high. Previous studies have focused on predictors of reoperation in several subgroups of patients with SAS, but rarely in the whole population of patients with SAS. Purpose We sought to describe long-term outcomes after SAS resection and to determine the predictors of reoperation after successful primary resection. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent SAS resection between 1994 and 2021 at our institution with at least 12 months’ follow-up. Patients with a single-ventricle physiology and idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were excluded. Demographic, surgical and echocardiographic data were analyzed. Outcomes were reoperation after successful primary resection, death and morbidities, including postoperative complete heart block and aortic regurgitation (AR) grade at latest follow-up. Results Seventy-six patients (paediatric, n = 72 and adult, n = 4) who underwent SAS resection were included in the analysis. Median length of postoperative follow-up was 11.1 years (IQR range: 7.3 – 15.7 years), with two late deaths. Reoperation due to recurrent obstruction or severe AR occurred in 24 patients (31.6%). Median time to reoperation was 7.5 years (IQR range: 3.6 – 11 years). Overall freedom from reoperation at 5 years and 10 years was 84.6% and 69.1% respectively. Gender and association with other cardiac defects did not differ significantly between those with reoperation and those without. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of reoperation were age at first surgery younger than 5 years (HR 3.54, 95% CI 1.06 – 11.83; P = 0.040) and tunnel-type lesions (HR 4.42, 95% CI 1.70 – 11.51; P = 0.002). Three patients (3.9%) had complete heart block and required placement of an implantable pacemaker. Following SAS resection, progression of AR was common (39/68, 57.3%) but only 5 patients (7.3%) developed sufficient regurgitation to require surgical repair or replacement. Conclusions Reoperation is not infrequent after surgical relief of SAS and reaches a plateau after 10 years. Younger age at first surgery and tunnel-type SAS independently predict reoperation. Progression of AR after corrective surgery of SAS is common, but fortunately only a minority of patients develop hemodynamically significant AR requiring reintervention.

Aortic regurgitation in bicuspid aortic valve: know to decide

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is the second cause of valve surgery in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and has distinctive characteristics of trileaflet regurgitation. The quantification variables of aortic regurgitation do not take into account the unique characteristics of bicuspid regurgitation. Recognition of the mechanisms that lead to bicuspid AR is relevant as it allows correct treatment planning and valve repair in candidate patients. Objective a prospective study was designed to identify the mechanisms of AR and the factors (clinical and anatomical) associated with the development of significant AR (moderate/severe) in adult patients with BAV. Materials and methods We included consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BAV evaluated between 2014 and 2021 with at least 3 years of follow-up by the Structural Heart Disease group of our institution. Valve disease was evaluated by echocardiography and complementary methods. It was classified as mild, moderate (Mod), and severe (Sev) aortic regurgitation, according to current criteria (integral approach with quantitative and semi-quantitative criteria). The prevalence of regurgitation mechanisms, the progression of aortic regurgitation, and predictive variables of significant AR and major cardiovascular events (death, surgery) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. A p&amp;lt;0.05 was considered significant. Surgery was indicated following international recommendations (ESC guidelines): symptoms development or ventricular dysfunction. Results We included 300 patients (39.7 ± 14.9 years, 72.6% men). Regarding valvular phenotype 84% (257p) presented fused BAV (coronary leaflets) and the majority with raphe (87.5%). 71.7% of the patients had some degree of aortic regurgitation at the start of follow-up (24.1% Mod/Sev AR). Among the patients with significant AR, 50% had cusp prolapse (86% prolapse of the fused leaflet), 39.18% dilatation of the aortic root, 26.6% significant calcification of the valve, 1.3% valve perforation and 29.4% restriction of valve movement. 43% with Mod/Sev AR had mixed mechanisms of regurgitation and the combination, half represented by the combination of aortic root dilatation and cusp prolapse (Fig 2). During follow-up 18–6% of patients with Mod AR showed progression to Sev AR and 4.7% underwent surgery. On the other hand, 34.1% of patients with baseline Sev AR required aortic valve surgery (p&amp;lt;0.01). Conclusions In our cohort, AR was highly prevalent: 1 out of 4 patients had significant AR at the start of follow-up. Eccentric jets and the presence of valve prolapse were frequent in patients with significant AR. 43% of BAV patients with Mod/Sev AR exhibited mixed regurgitating mechanisms. Because mechanism affects the choice of surgical technique, comprehensive mechanism description is critical in patients with BAV and AR.

Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft.

This study aimed to assess predictors of a composite endpoint (reoperation for aortic valve [AV] failure or aortic regurgitation [AR] grade ≥ 2) after reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) using the Valsalva graft. From 2012 to 2021, 112 patients underwent RAV in a single center. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the composite endpoint. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 52 years (44, 62). Nineteen patients (17%) were operated for acute Type A aortic dissection, and the remainder for aortic root aneurysm, 60 mm or larger in 12/112 (11%). Thirty-day mortality was 1/112 (1%). During follow-up, four patients (3.6%) were reoperated for AV failure, and another nine patients (8.1%) developed AR grade ≥ 2. Overall estimated freedom from reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2 was 87% (95% confidence interval: 76-93%) at 5 years. Significantly lower estimated 5-year freedom from the composite endpoint was found in cases with simultaneous aortic valve repair (AVr; 77 vs. 90%, p = 0.007) and nearly significant for large (≥ 6 cm) aortic root diameter (82 vs. 87%, p = 0.055). In Cox's analysis, aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were independent predictors for the composite endpoint. Outcomes (survival, reoperation, freedom from AR grade ≥ 2) with RAV were good up to 11-year follow-up. Larger aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were identified as predictors for reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2. Long-term follow-up remains necessary to confirm adequate AV function.

SPREAD multicentre study: sports practice and its effect on bicuspid aortic valve disease

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac condition among the general population and competitive athletes. BAV could be associated with progressive aortic dilatation, stenosis and/or regurgitation. There are concerns about the possible detrimental effects of exercise training on aortic size and valve function due to the hemodynamic stress on the aorta during exercise. However, data in the literature are scarce and sometimes discordant. Objectives This multicenter study aimed to analyze the influence of sport on aortic size and valve function in BAV patients. Methods Three groups were analyzed: competitive athletes with BAV, athletes with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and sedentary controls with BAV, age- and sex-matched. We assessed the morphology and degree of aortic valve stenosis, regurgitation, aortic dimension, and left ventricular (LV) characteristics by 2D echocardiography. Individuals with moderate-severe stenosis and regurgitation or relevant aortic dilation (&amp;gt; 45 mm (men) or &amp;gt;41 mm (women) were excluded from the study. Results The study population was composed of 500 subjects:184 BAV athletes (84% males; mean age 30±11 years), 191 TAV athletes (82% males; mean age 30±11 years), 125 BAV sedentary controls (82% males; mean age 34±10 years). The aortic annulus was greater in BAV athletes (25.0±3.6 mm) than in TAV athletes (21.7±2.9 mm) and BAV controls (23.9±3.6 mm), p&amp;lt;0.005. Sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta diameters were smaller in TAV athletes than in BAV subjects (&amp;lt;0.005), but there were no significant differences between BAV athletes and BAV controls. LV index volumes and mass were greater in BAV athletes than in the other two groups (p&amp;lt;0.005). Moreover, BAV athletes showed higher gradients than sedentary controls (p&amp;lt;0.005). Conclusions This multicenter study demonstrated that athletes with BAV have larger aortic diameters than athletes with TAV. However, no differences between BAV athletes and sedentary controls were observed, suggesting that exercise training does not significantly affect aortic dilation, with the exception of aortic annulus. Conversely, sports practice negatively influenced valve function in BAV athletes. Valvular dysfunction seems to affect the LV geometry, with a trend for being more dilated and hypertrophic in BAV athletes than in the other groups.

Progression of aortic regurgitation following transcatheter closure of intracristal ventricular septal defects in children: a mid- to long-term follow-up study.

Early surgical closure is warranted to prevent aortic valve lesion and aortic regurgitation (AR) in intracristal ventricular septal defects (icVSDs). Experiences for transcatheter device closure of icVSDs are still limited. Our objectives are to investigate AR progression following transcatheter closure of icVSDs in children and to explore the risk factors for AR progression. From January 2007 to December 2017, 50 children with icVSD who had successfully undergone transcatheter closure were enrolled. With 4.0 (interquartile range: 3.0-6.2) years of follow-up, AR progression was observed in 20% (10/50) of patients after icVSD occlusion, among which 16% (8/50) remained in mild level and 4% (2/50) evolved to moderate. None progressed to severe AR. Freedom from AR progression was 84.0%, 79.5%, and 79.5% at 1, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. A multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that x-ray exposure time [hazard ratio (HR): 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.18, P = 0.001] and the ratio of pulmonary to systemic blood flows (HR: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.11-10.29, P = 0.032) were independent predictors for AR progression. Our study suggested that transcatheter closure of icVSD in children is safe and feasible in mid- to long-term follow-up. No serious AR progression occurred after icVSD device closure. Greater left-to-right shunting and longer x-ray exposure time were both risk factors for AR progression.

Transfemoral Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defect Device Closure in Infants Weighing ≤ 10 kg

Transcatheter closure of Perimembranous VSDs (PMVSD) remains challenging particularly in infants. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transfemoral PMVSD device closure in infants weighing ≤ 10 kg in a single centre. Retrospective review of departmental databases and medical charts to define patient cohort and collect demographic, procedural and follow-up data. Between July 2014 and March 2021, 16 patients underwent attempted transfemoral PMVSD device closure (12 retrograde) at a median age of 11 months (interquartile range [IQR] 9–15.5) and a median weight of 8.3 kg (IQR 7.2–9.5). All patients were either symptomatic, had progressive left heart dilation or had VSD associated valve regurgitation. Median defect size on pre-procedural transoesophageal echocardiography was 6.8 mm (IQR 6–8.5). Median device waist size was 6 mm (IQR 4.5–8). Successful device placement was achieved in 14 patients (88%). One patient developed moderate aortic and tricuspid valve regurgitation upon retrograde and antegrade device deployment, respectively, and subsequently underwent surgical closure. The second patient developed progressive aortic regurgitation (AR) 2 days post procedure, and also underwent surgical removal with no residual AR. There was no cases of device embolization and no femoral arterial compromise. On median follow-up of 40.5 months (IQR 25–64), none of the patients developed complete heart block. Three patients (18.75%) had small residual shunts at latest follow-up which have not required any further intervention. Device closure of PMVSD’s in children weighing ≤ 10 kg is feasible and safe with good procedural success rates. Use of both the antegrade and retrograde approaches may be necessary depending on anatomical variances.

Reciprocal interferences of the left ventricular assist device and the aortic valve competence.

Patients suffering from end-stage heart failure tend to have high mortality rates. With growing numbers of patients progressing into severe heart failure, the shortage of available donors is a growing concern, with less than 10% of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation (CTx). Fortunately, the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), a variant of mechanical circulatory support has been on the rise in recent years. The expansion of LVADs has led them to be incorporated into a variety of clinical settings, based on the goals of therapy for patients ailing from heart failure. However, with an increase in the use of LVADs, there are a host of complications that arise with it. One such complication is the development and progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) which is noted to adversely influence patient outcomes and compromise pump benefits leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial and involve the aortic root-aortic valve (AV) complex, as well as the LVAD device, patient, and other factors, all of them alter the physiological mechanics of the heart resulting in AV dysfunction. Thus, it is imperative to screen patients before LVAD implantation for AR, as moderate or greater AR requires a concurrent intervention at the time of LVADs implantation. No current strict guidelines were identified in the literature search on how to actively manage and limit the development and/or progression of AR, due to the limited information. However, some recommendations include medical management by targeting fluid overload and arterial blood pressure, along with adjusting the settings of the LVADs device itself. Surgical interventions are to be considered depending on patient factors, goals of care, and the underlying pathology. These interventions include the closure of the AV, replacement of the valve, and percutaneous approach via percutaneous occluding device or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In the present review, we describe the interaction between AV and LVAD placement, in terms of patient management and prognosis. Also it is provided a comprehensive echocardiographic strategy for the precise assessment of AV regurgitation severity.

Impact of progressive aortic regurgitation on outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Aortic regurgitation (AR) following continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation (cf-LVAD) may adversely impact outcomes. We aimed to assess the incidence and impact of progressive AR after cf-LVAD on prognosis, biomarkers, functional capacity and echocardiographic findings. In an analysis of the PCHF-VAD database encompassing 12 European heart failure centers, patients were dichotomized according to the progression of AR following LVAD implantation. Patients with de-novo AR or AR progression (AR_1) were compared to patients without worsening AR (AR_0). Among 396 patients (mean age 53 ± 12years, 82% male), 153 (39%) experienced progression of AR over a median of 1.4years on LVAD support. Before LVAD implantation, AR_1 patients were less frequently diabetic, had lower body mass indices and higher baseline NT-proBNP values. Progressive AR did not adversely impact mortality (26% in both groups, HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.61-1.36]; P = 0.65). No intergroup variability was observed in NT-proBNP values and 6-minute walk test results at index hospitalization discharge and at 6-month follow-up. However, AR_1 patients were more likely to remain in NYHA class III and had worse right ventricular function at 6-month follow-up. Lack of aortic valve opening was related to de-novo or worsening AR (P < 0.001), irrespective of systolic blood pressure (P = 0.67). Patients commonly experience de-novo or worsening AR when exposed to continuous flow of contemporary LVADs. While reducing effective forward flow, worsening AR did not influence survival. However, less complete functional recovery and worse RV performance among AR_1 patients were observed. Lack of aortic valve opening was associated with progressive AR.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on clinical outcomes in patients with Stage B progressive aortic regurgitation (mild to moderate and moderate grades).

BackgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant comorbidity in patients with heart failure and valvular heart disease. Renal impairment is not well evaluated in the patients with Stage B progressive aortic regurgitation (AR) (mild to moderate and moderate grades in this study), for estimating outcome.HypothesisWe sought to investigate the prognostic factor, especially CKD, in the patients with progressive AR.MethodsWe enrolled 262 patients with Stage B progressive AR and preserved left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction ≥ 50%). Based on the presence of CKD, the patients were divided into CKD (n = 70) and non‐CKD (n = 192) groups, which CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and aortic valve replacement.ResultsThe median follow‐up duration was 41.5 (interquartile range: 16.2–71.7) months. Between groups, the CKD patients were older; they had a higher pulse pressure and higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cerebrovascular accident, and atrial fibrillation. Compared to the non‐CKD group, the CKD group had lower eʹ velocity (4.36 ± 2.21 vs. 5.20 ± 2.30 cm/s, p = .009), higher right ventricular systolic pressure (38.02 ± 15.79 vs. 33.86 ± 11.77 mmHg, p = .047). The CKD group was associated with increased risk of MACEs (41.4% vs. 22.4%; unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–2.85, p = .017). In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the risk of MACEs was significantly different between groups (adjusted HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.11–2.62, p = .015); furthermore, the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (10.0% vs. 2.6%; adjusted HR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.16–4.55, p = .017) was significantly higher in the CKD group than in the non‐CKD group.ConclusionsIn patients with Stage B progressive AR, CKD is an independent prognostic factor for clinical outcomes (composite clinical outcome, hospitalization for heart failure).

Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation: The Natural Course and Factors Associated With Progression.

BackgroundValve regurgitation can decrease with resolution of hemodynamic loads on the left ventricle (LV) after kidney transplantation (KT). We aimed to investigate the natural course of left-side valve regurgitation after KT and factors associated with progression.MethodsAmong patients who underwent KT in two tertiary centers, 430 (224 men, mean age 50 ± 13 years) were examined by echocardiography within 3 months before KT and between 6 and 36 months after KT. Mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR) were graded according to the current guidelines. Regression was defined as a decrease in regurgitation by one or more steps, and progression was an increase in one or more steps after KT. Clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with progression of MR and AR were analyzed.ResultsMild or greater MR was observed in 216 (50%) patients before KT, and mild or greater AR was observed in 99 (23%). During the follow-up period of 23.4 ± 9.9 months, most patients experienced regression or no change in regurgitation after KT, but 34 patients (7.9%) showed MR progression and 37 (8.6%) revealed AR progression. Patients who showed MR progression were more likely to receive a second KT, have mitral annular calcifications, and show a smaller decrease in LV end-systolic dimension. Patients who showed AR progression were more likely to have persistent hypertension after KT, aortic valve calcifications, and a smaller reduction of LV end-systolic dimension.ConclusionsRisk factors for progression of MR after KT include a second KT, MAC and a smaller decrease in LV end-systolic dimension after KT. Risk factors for progression of AR include valve calcification, persistent hypertension and a smaller decrease in LV end-systolic dimension after KT. Further echocardiographic surveillance and risk factor management after KT are warranted in these patients.

Risk factors of aortic regurgitation progression in Chinese patients with Takayasu's arteritis: a prospective cohort study.

Objective:To elucidate the 3-year follow-up outcomes and risk factors associated with aortic regurgitation progression in Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK).Methods:This study was a prospective cohort study conducted among 77 patients with TAK at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China. All the participants were followed up and assessed with echocardiography for 3 years, and the baseline characteristics and dynamic changes in the aortic valve were recorded and investigated. A multivariable Cox model was used to explore the risk factors for aortic regurgitation progression.Results:The median onset age was 36.9 (26.0–44.4) years, and 57 patients (74.0%) were females. Fifty patients (64.9%) complained of aortic regurgitation, which was the most common valvular lesion at baseline. During the 3-year follow-up period, the progression of aortic regurgitation was observed in 29 (37.7%) patients with TAK. The progression group had higher baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; p = 0.013) and interleukin (IL)-6 (p = 0.029) levels and lower early treatment remission rates (p = 0.024). According to the Cox model, the elevated baseline IL-6 level [>13 pg/ml, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.0–5.8, p = 0.042] and absence of early treatment remission (HR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.3–8.2, p = 0.010) were the independent risk factors for aortic regurgitation deterioration.Conclusion:About one-third of patients with TAK experienced aortic regurgitation progression within 3 years from first admission. Elevated IL-6 levels at baseline and absence of early treatment remission were the two important risk factors for subsequent aortic regurgitation progression.

Outcomes Following Supracoronary Ascending Aortic Replacement with Aortic Valve Resuspension versus Modified Bentall's Operation for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

IntroductionType A acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains a challenging cardiac emergency despite the availability of various management strategies. This study compared the outcomes of supracoronary ascending aortic replacement (SCAAR) with aortic valve (AV) resuspension with those of modified Bentall's operation for type A AAD and the progression of aortic regurgitation (AR), long-term dilatation of aortic root and proximal arch, and long-term mortality in SCAAR patients.MethodsSixty patients underwent surgery for type A AAD (January 2005 to December 2015). Forty-three patients underwent SCAAR with AV resuspension and 17 underwent modified Bentall's operation. All patients were followed up.ResultsUpon follow-up of SCAAR patients (n=40), there was significant reduction in aortic root size (preoperative 39.3 mm [9.4] vs. postoperative 33.1 mm [9.1]; P<0.001). Three of these patients worsened to severe AR while others had similar or lesser degree of AR. On comparison between preoperative and postoperative dimensions of all patients (n=53), there was no significant difference in distal ascending aorta size (35.7 mm [8.1] vs. 34.4 mm [8.9]; P=0.52). However, an increase in descending thoracic aorta size (28.8 mm [7.8] vs. 33.7 mm [9.9]; P<0.001) was observed. In-hospital and late mortalities for SCAAR vs. modified Bentall's procedure were 11.7% (seven patients) (7% [3] vs. 23.5% [4]) and 28% (15 patients) (15% [6] vs. 69% [9]), respectively.ConclusionSCAAR with AV resuspension is a safe surgical option for type A AAD. Preservation of AV is associated with better long-term outcomes and reduced mortality. Modified Bentall's operation may be associated with long-term mortality.

Differential characteristics associated with progression of mitral and aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing kidney transplantation

Abstract Background Heart valve regurgitation is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, there are no data on the fate of mitral regurgitation (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR) after kidney transplantation (KT). In this study, we sought to investigate regression or progression rates of MR and AR after KT in patients with ESRD. Moreover, we aimed to explore clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with the progression of MR and AR in patients undergoing KT. Methods Among 1,734 patients who underwent KT from 2005 to 2018 at a single tertiary hospital, 674 patients (407 men; mean 48±12 years) who underwent both pre- and post-KT echocardiography were analyzed comprehensively. Pre-KT echocardiography was performed within three months of KT, and post-KT echocardiography was done between 6 months and 24 months after KT. Severities of MR and AR were graded as no/trivial, mild, moderate, and severe according to the current guidelines. Regression was defined if the severity decreased by one or more grades, while progression was defined if the severity increased by one or more grades. Results Figure 1 shows the regression or progression of MR and AR after KT. 78 (11%) patients showed MR regression, but 41 (6%) experienced MR progression. 13 (2%) revealed AR regression, while 23 (4%) presented AR progression. In patients with MR progression, there were more cases of receiving a second KT, having mitral annular calcification, and showing lesser reduction of left atrial volume after KT. Patients with AR progression showed a longer hemodialysis duration, persistent hypertension after KT, and aortic root dilatation. Factors related to the progression of MR and AR showed statistically meaningful predictive values in a stepwise manner (Figure 2) Conclusions In patients undergoing KT, MR and AR may progress in patients with certain distinct characteristics. Different clinical and echocardiographic characteristics before KT, and reduction of hemodynamic loads after KT determine the progression of MR and AR. Further echocardiographic surveillances after KT are needed in patients with clinical and echocardiographic factors for progression of valve regurgitation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Reinforced Aortic Root Reconstruction in Type A Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Study.

Type A aortic dissection is a challenging surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Many techniques have evolved to repair the dissected sinus segments and restore aortic valve dynamics. Herein, we evaluate the early outcome of a novel technique for reconstruction of dissected aortic root. A prospective study was conducted on 300 patients to evaluate the early results of repair of dissected root in type A aortic dissection. The mean age was 59.65±8.52 years, and 76% of patients were males. All patients had four standard steps for aortic reconstruction: 1) commissural resuspension; 2) right coronary sinus reinforcement with pericardial and Dacron bands; 3) non-coronary sinus reinforcement using external Dacron patch; 4) circumferential inversion of adventitial layer of the root. Patients were followed up clinically, echocardiographically, and by CT scan. The in-hospital mortality was 8%. The mean cross-clamp time was 120±30 minutes, and circulatory arrest time was 25+10 minutes. Twenty-seven patients (9%) experienced postoperative complications, including bleeding and acute kidney injury. During a mean follow-up time of 48±12 months, there were no recurrent aortic dissection, aortic dilatation, pseudoaneurysm, or progression of aortic regurgitation during the entire study period. This reconstructive technique technically is undemanding, feasible, safe, and durable with good early results. A larger cohort of patients with longer period of follow up should generate a more powerful evaluation of this technique.

Spontaneous Dislocation of a Frozen Elephant Trunk Stent Graft Into the False Lumen

A 69-year-old patient was treated with supracoronary ascending and hemiarch replacement in 2016 for an acute type A aortic dissection. His aortic arch progressed to 6.0 cm within 1 year, and he underwent complete arch replacement by frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation (Thoraflex, Terumo Aortic) and valve-sparing aortic root replacement for progressive aortic regurgitation in 2017. The patient was discharged with an unremarkable postoperative computed tomographic angiography scan (Figure 1A).

Risk Factors for Aortic Regurgitation Progression After Repair of Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm

The main treatment for a ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is surgical repair. Postoperative progression of aortic regurgitation (AR) following SVA repair increases the risk of reoperation, which decreases the long-term survival. Thus, identifying the risk factors for postoperative AR progression is of great significance. Adult patients who were diagnosed with ruptured SVA and underwent surgical repair at the current centre were reviewed. Necessary data in the institutional database were extracted. The perioperative and follow-up assessments of the aortic valve by transthoracic echocardiography were also obtained. The aortic regurgitation progression was grouped into three categories: newly developing, recurrence, and worsening. Sixteen (16) variables were screened to identify potential risk factors by univariate logistic regression analysis or Chi-squared test. Variables with p-values <0.1 were further analysed by multivariate logistic regression models to find independent risk factors. A total of 198 consecutive patients from June 2006 to January 2018 were included. The overall incidence of postoperative AR progression was 19.2% (38 of 198). After the univariate analysis, SVA originating from the right coronary sinus, coexisting with ventricular septal defect, larger diameter of aortic annulus, and larger cardiothoracic ratio were screened as potential risk factors. Multivariate analysis indicated that coexisting with a ventricular septal defect (VSD) (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.217-6.532; p=0.016) and larger cardiothoracic ratio (OR, 1.061; 95% CI, 1.001-1.124; p=0.047) were independent risk factors for postoperative AR progression. To prevent postoperative AR progression after surgical repair, more careful inspection and appropriate surgical techniques are necessary for patients coexisting with VSD or with a larger cardiothoracic ratio.