Progression-free Survival HR Research Articles

Comparison of survival outcomes and safety between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance in newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

ObjectiveThis multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to compare survival outcomes and adverse events between early and late initiation of niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.MethodsWe...

The Efficacy of Cabazitaxel in Treating Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cabazitaxel, a second-generation taxane chemotherapy agent, has demonstrated efficacy in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who have previously received docetaxel-based therapy. By targeting microtubule dynamics, cabazitaxel inhibits cancer cell division and induces apoptosis, thereby extending survival and delaying disease progression in this challenging patient population. A systematic review and meta-analysis were done by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, MEDLINE (including MEDLINE InProcess; OvidSP), Web of Science, Embase (OvidSP), and Scopus databases. ROB2 Cochrane tools assessment for RCTs. In the analysis, we used RevMan Cochrane software. Our research reveals significantly improved outcomes in terms of patient survival rates, both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), for cabazitaxel over comparative treatment (PFS HR 0.77 [0.61, 0.97]) (OS HR 0.79 [0.70, 0.88]). The treatment response rates were also favorable for cabazitaxel, reported as PSA Reduction Response of more than 50% (PRR) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.59 [0.56, 4.52]) and tumor response rate (TRR) (OR = 2.34 [1.28, 4.28]). Cabazitaxel was associated with significantly more incidence of adverse events. The risk ratio (RR) for serious adverse events was 1.64 [1.14, 2.35] for cabazitaxel compared to the current regimen. A systematic review and meta-analysis were done by searching in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, MEDLINE (including MEDLINE InProcess; OvidSP), Web of Science, Embase (OvidSP), and Scopus databases. ROB2 Cochrane tools assessment for RCTs. In the analysis, we used RevMan Cochrane software.

Patient- vs Physician-Initiated Response to Symptom Monitoring and Health-Related Quality of Life

Online symptom monitoring through patient-reported outcomes can enhance health-related quality of life and survival. However, widespread adoption in clinical care remains limited due to various barriers including the need to reduce health care practitioners' workload. To report the effects of patient-reported outcome (PRO) symptom monitoring on HRQOL and survival up to 1 year after initiation of any treatment in patients with lung cancer. SYMPRO-Lung is a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial including patients with stage I to IV lung cancer. The inclusion period was from October 24, 2019, until September 16, 2021, and data collection ended October 8, 2022. Data analysis was conducted from November 9, 2023, until March 18, 2024. Patients in the intervention group reported PRO symptoms weekly using the Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events lung cancer subset. If symptoms exceeded a validated threshold, an alert was sent to the health care practitioner (active intervention subgroup) or to the patient (reactive intervention subgroup). Patients in the control group received standard care. Health-related quality of life was measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire at baseline, 15 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2), and 1 year (T3), with the summary score (SS) and physical functioning (PF) as primary end points. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess mean differences over time. Effect size (ES) of 0.40 or greater was considered clinically relevant. Cox proportional hazards regression survival analyses were performed to estimate the effect of the intervention on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. A total of 515 patients (266 [51.7%] men; mean [SD] age, 65.4 [9.4] years) were included in the study (266 in the control group; 249 in the pooled intervention group). Most baseline characteristics were balanced between groups; however, the most notable exception was the distribution in cancer staging: the intervention group had a higher proportion of patients with stage IV cancer compared with the control group (139 [56%] vs 118 [44%]). The pooled intervention group had a significantly better SS (mean difference T1, 5.22; 95% CI, 2.72-7.73; P < .001; ES = 0.33; mean difference T2, 6.28; 95% CI, 3.65-8.92; P < .001; ES = 0.40; mean difference T3, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.15-6.80; P = .006; ES = 0.25) compared with the control group. Group differences improved more in PF but did not meet the ES greater than or equal to 0.40 threshold (mean difference T1, 7.00; 95% CI, 3.65-10.35; P < .001; ES = 0.27; mean difference T2, 6.79; 95% CI, 3.26-10.31; P < .001; ES = 0.26; mean difference T3, 5.01; 95% CI, 1.23-8.79; P = .009; ES = 0.19). No significant differences in HRQOL were observed between the reactive (n = 89) and active (n = 160) intervention groups. The HR for progression-free survival for the active intervention group compared with the control group was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.58-1.04); the finding was not statistically significant. The HR for overall survival for both interventions groups compared with the control group were not statistically significant.(active: HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.55-1.15; reactive: HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.42-1.15). In this 1-year follow-up of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, PRO symptom monitoring yielded improvements in long-term HRQOL in patients with lung cancer. The reactive approach proved equally effective as the active approach. A nonsignificant potential survival benefit was observed for the intervention group. These positive results provide further evidence for the usefulness of routine PRO symptom monitoring in lung cancer care. The Netherlands trial register Identifier: NL7897.

8 Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: 8-year follow-up with analyses in favorable risk patients from the phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial

Abstract Background First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has provided substantial long-term survival benefits over sunitinib (SUN) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214. With a median follow-up of 8 years, the longest follow-up to date for any phase 3 trial of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in patients with aRCC, we report survival, response per independent radiology review committee (IRRC), and safety in all randomized patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population) and in patients with International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable risk. Methods Patients with clear cell aRCC were randomized 1:1 to NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W×4 doses, followed by NIVO (3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W); or SUN 50 mg once daily for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off. Key study endpoints included overall survival (OS), IRRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate/poor-risk (primary), ITT (secondary), and favorable-risk (exploratory) patients. Cancer-specific survival was evaluated in ITT patients by censoring all causes of death other than RCC. Post hoc exploratory analyses in patients with favorable risk were performed. Results With 8 years (99.1 months) median follow-up, OS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN remained superior in ITT patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; Table). The HR for PFS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 0.88. ORR was higher with NIVO+IPI versus SUN (Table), with more complete responses (12% vs 3%) and a longer median duration of response (DOR) in the combination arm versus SUN. In patients with favorable risk, OS benefits were similar between arms (HR, 0.82; Table). The HR for PFS favored SUN (HR, 1.76). ORR was lower with NIVO+IPI versus SUN, yet more patients achieved complete responses (13% vs 6%, respectively) and median DOR was longer with NIVO+IPI. Median cancer-specific survival (95% CI) in ITT patients was 73.7 (62.8-91.2) months with NIVO+IPI versus 45.1 (37.8-53.3) months with SUN (HR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.82). In exploratory post hoc analyses of patients with favorable risk, 75/125 (60.0%) patients in the NIVO+IPI arm and 85/124 (68.5%) patients in the SUN arm died over 8 years of follow-up. Of these patients, 31 in the NIVO+IPI arm and 27 in the SUN arm died within 3 years of randomization; the primary reason for death was disease in either arm (71.0% and 85.2%, respectively). Furthermore, among 27 patients in the NIVO+IPI arm with favorable risk who died after disease progression within 3 years, 12 patients did not receive second-line systemic therapy. Beyond 3 years, only 2 of 43 patients who died after disease progression did not receive subsequent systemic therapy. Among all treated patients, incidence of any-grade and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events remained largely unchanged. No new drug-related deaths occurred in either arm since the previous database lock. Table Conclusions With a median follow-up up of 8 years, NIVO+IPI continues to demonstrate sustained survival and more durable response benefits versus SUN in the ITT population, including a further reduction in the risk of death with NIVO+IPI as measured by cancer-specific survival. Long-term exploratory data in patients with favorable risk have shown a steady improvement in the HR for OS, and a marked improvement in median DOR and complete response rates with NIVO+IPI versus SUN, thus contributing to the survival and response benefits reported in the ITT population. Furthermore, the disproportionate number of patients with favorable risk who died within 3 years of randomization after documented progression without receiving subsequent therapy may have affected the HR for OS in this patient population early on. NIVO+IPI offers the potential for positive long-term outcomes, regardless of IMDC risk, and with no emergence of new safety signals.

SACI-IO HR+: A randomized phase II trial of sacituzumab govitecan with or without pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

LBA1004 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a TROP2 antibody drug conjugate (ADC) with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload (SN-38) approved for previously treated triple negative and hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Double-strand DNA breaks induced by SN-38 activate cGAS-STING, stimulating type I IFN production and T cell recruitment. SN-38 can upregulate MHC class-I and PD-L1 expression, enhance cytotoxic T cell effector functions and deplete regulatory T cells. To evaluate if SG synergizes with pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) we conducted a randomized, open-label phase 2 study comparing SG with or without pembrolizumab in HR+/HER2- MBC (NCT04448886). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HR+ (ER≥1% and/or PR≥1%), HER2- breast cancer treated with ≥1 prior endocrine therapy and 0-1 chemotherapy (CT) for MBC. Pts with brain metastases were eligible if locoregional therapy was completed and steroids discontinued ≥7 days before study therapy. Pts who received prior topoisomerase I inhibitor ADC, irinotecan or PD-1/L1 inhibitors were excluded. Pts were randomized 1:1 to Arm A [SG 10 mg/kg IV (D1, D8) + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV (D1), 21-day cycle] or Arm B (SG alone). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included PFS in PD-L1+ pts (22C3 CPS ≥1), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity (NCI CTCAE v5.0). Baseline and on-treatment biopsies were performed for correlative analyses. For this preliminary analysis, data were locked 1/12/24. Results: Between 03/2021-01/2024, 110 pts enrolled; 104 pts (52 Arm A; 52 Arm B) started study therapy and were included in the analysis. Median age was 57 yrs (range: 27-81); 102 pts (98.1%) were female. 80 pts (76.9%) received prior CDK4/6 inhibitor for MBC; 58 (55.8%) had no prior CT, 46 (44.2%) had 1 prior line of CT for MBC. At a median follow-up of 9.2 months (mo), median PFS was 8.4 mo in Arm A vs 6.2 mo in Arm B (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47-1.23, log-rank p=0.26); ORR 21.2% and 17.3%, respectively. OS data are immature with only 26 events to date; OS was 16.9 mo vs 17.1 mo (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.30-1.41, log-rank p=0.28), respectively. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities (≥G2) in Arm A were neutropenia (67.3%), fatigue (36.5%), alopecia (36.5%), anemia (32.7%), leukopenia (26.9%), diarrhea (21.2%) and nausea (21.2%); in Arm B, neutropenia (59.6%), alopecia (38.5%), diarrhea (34.6%), nausea (32.7%), fatigue (32.7%) and anemia (21.2%). Conclusions: Addition of pembrolizumab to SG showed a non-significant trend toward improved PFS in unselected HR+/HER2- MBC at this preliminary time point. Final PFS and updated OS with further follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Exploratory outcome analyses by TROP2 and PD-L1 expression will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT04448886 .

Interim results of the randomized phase 2 cohort of study FW-2020-01 assessing the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of CM24 in combination with nivolumab and chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer.

LBA4143 Background: The novel monoclonal antibody CM24 blocks the activity of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (CEACAM1), known to have key roles in cancer progression, immune evasion, and metastasis. We present the interim efficacy and safety data from the global multi-center, open label, randomized Phase 2 study (NCT 04731467) in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who progressed after 1st line therapy, treated with CM24, nivolumab (nivo) and chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy (CH). Methods: Patients with advanced/metastatic PDAC progressing after 1 prior line of systemic therapy including fluoropyrimidine/irinotecan or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, having ≥1 measurable lesion, ≥18-year-old, ECOG ≤1 and adequate organ function were randomized 1:1 based on the class of prior CH received. Randomization was either to the experimental groups (EX) receiving CM24 (20mg/kg, q2wk), nivo (240mg/kg, q2wk) with one of the following CH regimens, liposomal irinotecan, 5 fluorouracil and leucovorin (Nal-IRI; q2wk) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (gem/nab; q1wk x3) or the control groups (C) with one of the CH regimens alone. This is a Bayesian design with an overall planned sample size of 60 pts with Overall Survival (OS) as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). An interim estimate of PFS HR, ORR and DCR based on data cut-off date of 21 Feb 2024 is reported. The analysis compares the EX vs. the respective C arm using log-rank test stratified by CH regimen. Results: A total of 63 PDAC pts were evenly randomized across the study arms. At data cut-off date, a total of 18 pts, 9 per treatment regimen remain on treatment. The median follow-up time for the Nal-IRI regimen is 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.5-8.4) and 5.2 months (95% CI: 4.0-6.7) for the gem/nab regimen. Median PFS ORR and DCR for the Nal-IRI EX arm were 3.8m (1.9-5.1; HR 0.70; p=0.213), 18.8% and 62.6%, and for the Nal-IRI C arm 1.9m (1.8-5.6), 6.3% and 40%, respectively (Table). Data for the gem/nab regimen and OS data for both regimens are not mature. Overall Grade ≥3 AE rate was 50% in the Nal-IRI EX arm and 13% in the C arm. The most common treatment-emergent grade ≥3 AEs EX vs. C were diarrhea (18.8% vs 6.7%), fatigue (18.8% vs 6.7%) and anemia (6.3% vs 0%). Conclusions: The interim analysis suggests that the combination of CM24/nivo/Nal-IRI/5FU/LV has a manageable safety profile with a longer PFS supported by higher ORR and DCR. OS Data continues to mature and will be reported once available. Clinical trial information: NCT04731467 . [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of the vebreltinib in patients with previously treated, secondary glioblastoma/IDH mutant glioblastoma with PTPRZ1-METFUsion GENe (FUGEN): A randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase II/III trial.

2003 Background: Although gliomas with mutated IDH have an improved prognosis compared to gliomas with wild-type IDH, IDH-mutant gliomas carry a high risk of malignant transformation from low-grade gliomas into high-grade gliomas within 10 years, resulting in poor prognosis. However, effective targeted drugs for high-grade gliomas are still lacking. Here, we report data from the FUGEN study of Vebreltinib, the first completed phase II/III trial of sGBM / IDH mutant glioblastoma patients with previously treated, PTPRZ1-MET Fusion gene positive. Methods: In this open-label, phase II/III trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, 84 patients with Histologically confirmed secondary GBM or IDH-mutant GBM to receive twice-daily oral vebreltinib in 300 mg dose or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (temozolomide [100-150 mg/m2/day, 7days on followed by 7 days off ] or cis-platinum [80-100 mg/m2 for 3 days] combined with etoposide [100mg/m2/day for 3 days]) every 28 days. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Results: 42 patients of the vebreltinib group and 39 patients of the chemotherapy group were included in the full analysis set. After a median follow-up of 4.44 months, the median OS in the vebreltinib group and chemotherapy group was 6.31 months (95% CI, 4.44-8.77) and 3.38 months (95% CI, 2.37-4.27), respectively. The HR for OS was 0.52 (90% CI, 0.32-0.85; P = 0.009). The median PFS in the vebreltinib group and chemotherapy group was 1.87 months (95% CI, 1.41-2.76) and 1.05 months (95% CI, 0.95-1.77), respectively. The HR for PFS was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.33-0.88; P = 0.014). No significant differences were observed in ORR (9.5% vs. 2.6%) for the vebreltinib group and chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 7% of the patients in the vebreltinib group, as compared with 12.2% of those in the chemotherapy group. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions: These results of the FUGEN trail support the use of vebreltinib as the first target therapy in patients with previously treated, PTPRZ1-MET fusion gene positive, secondary glioblastoma / IDH-mutant glioblastoma, and shed light on a novel therapeutic pathway in the landscape of IDH-mutant high-grade gliomas. Clinical Trials Information: NCT06105619 and ChiCTR2300077783 Research Funding:Beijing Pearl Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Avistone Biotechnology Limited. Clinical trial information: NCT06105619 .

Clinical utility of molecular imaging in newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer.

1019 Background: Optimizing patient outcome prediction in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can potentially reduce patients’ and healthcare burden. Molecular imaging to visualize early metabolic change, baseline whole-body human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and estrogen receptor (ER) expression might achieve this. In the prospective multicenter IMPACT study, we evaluated the clinical utility of molecular imaging to improve standard diagnostics in patients with newly diagnosed MBC of all subtypes. Methods: Patients underwent extensive workup, including baseline metastasis biopsy, [18F]FDG-PET, [89Zr]trastuzumab-PET (HER2-PET), [18F]FES-PET, and early [18F]FDG-PET after 2 weeks. Treatment was based on HER2 or ER subtype determined in biopsy (immunohistochemistry, IHC; standard-of-care) or PET findings (HER2- and [18F]FES-PET; investigational) in case of negative biopsy but positive HER2 and/or [18F]FES-PET scan. Clinical utility of molecular imaging was defined as the capacity to identify poor patient outcome, measured as progressive disease (PD) on CT at 8 weeks, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Two hundred patients were included. Progression on early [18F]FDG-PET was related to poor outcome in all subtypes (median PFS 4.1 versus 19.4 months, OS 19.4 versus 45.0 months). Early [18F]FDG-PET correctly predicted non-PD on 8 week CT (specificity 90.5%, negative predictive value 94.1%), but sensitivity and positive predictive value for PD was low (50 and 37.5%, respectively). However, early [18F]FDG-PET related better to long-term outcome than CT: patients with non-PD on 8 week CT, but with progression on early [18F]FDG-PET, had a median PFS and OS of 9.5 and 22.3 months respectively, compared to 19.4 and 50.1 months without [18F]FDG-PET progression (PFS HR 1.76 (95%CI 1.0 – 2.9), OS HR 1.93 (1.0 – 3.5)). HER2 or ER subtype was discrepant between biopsy and PET in 52 out of 200 (26%) patients, yielding investigational PET-based treatment options in 41 (21%) patients. In patients with HER2-positive biopsy IHC disease who received standard HER2-targeting treatment, median PFS with positive- versus negative HER2-PET was 23.2 and 4.5 months, respectively. In patients with biopsy IHC HER2-negative disease but positive HER2-PET, median PFS was with investigational HER2-targeted treatment 11.4 months, without 7.4 months. The pattern was similar in ER-positive disease, although less pronounced for biopsy- and PET-based subtypes. Conclusions: This study supports the clinical utility of molecular imaging with [18F]FDG-PET, HER2-PET, and [18F]FES-PET, to improve standard diagnostics for outcome and subtype assessment in patients with newly diagnosed MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT01957332 .

Prognostic indicators of recurrence after surgical resection in non-pancreatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

e16287 Background: The incidence of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) has continued to increase over the last two decades. In patients with locoregional disease, surgical resection of the primary tumor without additional therapies is considered standard of care. The frequency and risk factors associated with recurrence and survival in patients with non-pancreatic GI-NETs are poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate clinical and pathological factors associated with recurrence and survival in patients with resected non-pancreatic GI-NETs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who presented to the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2000-2019 with locoregional small bowel, colon, appendiceal, and rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent surgical resection with curative intent. We collected clinical and pathological data including tumor primary site, tumor differentiation, grade using Ki-67 labeling index (grade 1, 2, or 3), margin involvement, perineural or vascular invasion, time of recurrence, patterns of recurrence, and death. Patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and insufficient follow up were excluded. Results: A total of 133 patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients had tumors originating from the small bowel (n = 87, 66%), followed by the appendix (n = 19, 15%), rectum (n = 18, 14%), and colon (n = 7, 5%). With a median follow-up of 35 months, 23 patients (17%) had tumor progression after curative-intent surgery, with the liver (n = 13, 57%) as the most common site. In the majority of patients, tumors were well-differentiated (n = 118, 97%) and grade 1 (n = 78, 75%). Intermediate/high grade tumors (grade 2/3) occurred in 26 (25%) of patients. Median progression-free survival was 226 months (18.8 years). Age (greater than 60) and intermediate/high grade tumors (grade 2 or 3) were associated with worse overall survival HR = 5.5 (95% CI: 1.5, 19.6), p = 0.009, and HR = 3.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 10.2), p = 0.034, respectively. Tumor grade (2 or 3) and positive nodes were associated with worse progression-free survival HR = 4.5 (95% CI: 2.0, 10.1), p = 4e-04, and HR = 3.1 (95% CI: 1.4, 6.8), p = 0.009, respectively. Conclusions: A significant number of patients (17%) with non-pancreatic GI-NETs had tumor progression after curative-intent surgery. Risk factors for recurrence include intermediate/high-grade tumors and positive lymph nodes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of adjuvant therapy in patients at higher risk of recurrence following surgical resection for non-pancreatic GI-NETs.

Impact of metformin on melanoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BackgroundThere is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.MethodsSelection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using ‘Melanoma’ and ‘Metformin’ as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and I2 statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.ResultsA total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I2 = 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I2 = 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I2 = 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I2 = 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.DiscussionThe improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.

Abstract PO3-26-01: Preclinical in vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel, wild-type-sparing, PI3Kα H1047R mutant-selective inhibitor

Abstract The PI3K pathway is a key cell cycle regulating pathway that has an established role in tumor growth and development. Specifically, the H1047R and helical domain mutations E542K/E545K of the p110α subunit of PI3K are known activating mutations that are targeted by inhibitors under clinical investigation as well as by approved drugs. PI3Kα mutations are prevalent in patients with breast, colorectal, lung, endometrial, and numerous other cancers. The approved PI3Kα inhibitor, alpelisib, shows promise for this targeted class with improvements in progression-free survival in HR+/Her2- breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant. However, tolerability concerns such as hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal issues, and skin reactions have emerged related to on-target inhibition of wild type PI3Kα. These issues likely limit dose administration leading to exposure which is suboptimal for maximal efficacy and creates an opportunity to identify an inhibitor with an improved tolerability profile that targets oncogenic mutations while sparing wild type PI3Kα. Herein, we present preclinical in vitro and in vivo activity of a novel, wild type sparing PI3Kα inhibitor which is potent against the oncogenic H1047R mutation. Citation Format: Aaron C. Smith, Ben Arwood-Levine, Alexandra Born, Richard Brizendine, Payal Chatterjee, Mark J. Chicarelli, Michael L. Conner, Brad Fell, Jennifer Fulton, Anna Guarnieri, Ravi Jalluri, Hailey Knox, Keith Koch, Daniel Krischlunas, Vijay Kumar, Colin McHugh, Brent Mclean, Kelsey Nassar, Brad Newhouse, Rob Rieger, John Robinson, Marelí Rodriguez, Leah Salituro, Lee Stunkard, Francis Sullivan, Roy Turton, Shannon Winski, Yeyun Zhou. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel, wild-type-sparing, PI3Kα H1047R mutant-selective inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-26-01.

Abstract PS08-02: Efficacy of Sacituzumab-Govitecan (SG) post Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and vice versa for HER2low advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): a French multicentre retrospective study

Abstract Background: Based on ASCENT, TROPICS-02 and DESTINY-Breast04 trials, SG and T-DXd recently became approved for HER2low MBC. Since the payloads of both SG and T-DXd belong to the same cytotoxic class (topoisomerase-1 inhibitor), cross-resistance is a potential concern. However, no data is available on the efficacy of one antibody drug conjugate (ADC) after another and the best therapeutic sequence has not been evaluated yet. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in 19 French comprehensive cancer centres. All patients (pts) with HR+ or HR- and HER2low MBC treated with SG followed, immediately or not, by T-DXd (or vice versa) were included. HR expression was defined on the last available tumor sample. The study primary objective was to report the second ADC (ADC2) progression-free survival (PFS) in the whole population. Secondary objectives included first ADC (ADC1) progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) in the whole population and subgroup analyses by HR status. Results: The individual data of 126 eligible women were obtained from 19 participating centres. Median age was 54.5 years (range: 30-80y). N=110 (87.3%) pts had invasive carcinoma of not special type, N=12 (9.5%) invasive lobular carcinoma and 4 (3.2%) other histological subtype. N=87 (69%) and 39 (31%) had HR+/HER2low and HR-/HER2low MBC, respectively. N=16 patients were germline mutation carriers (BRCA1 N=7; BRCA2 N=6; other genes on HBOC panel N=3). ADC1 was given as a median of third (range: 1-10) line of chemotherapy and ADC2 as fifth (range: 2-12) line. A large majority (N=94, 74.6%) of pts received SG as ADC1 (N=82 with HR- and N=12 with HR+ MBC) while N=32 (25.4%) received T-DXd as ADC1 (N=27 with HR+ and n=5 with HR- MBC). 53.2% (N=67) received ADC1 immediately followed by ADC2 while 46.8% (N=59) received ADC2 after 1 (N=40) or 2 (N=12) or ≥ 3 (N=6) other lines of chemotherapy. N=19 (15.07%) and N=26 (20.63%) had a meningeal and/or cerebral metastasis at the time of the initiation of ADC1 and ADC2 respectively. After a median follow-up of 3 months, ADC2 was discontinued in 63 pts of which 51 (82.3%) for progression disease and 4 (6.5%) for toxicity due to T-DXd. Importantly, 50% of pts (N=63) were still under ADC2 at the time of this first analysis. The observed median PFS for ADC2 and median PFI for ADC1 are presented in the Table below: Median OS was not reached independently of the sub-populations of pts. Population and sequential regimen Median (mo) PFI ADC1 Median (mo) PFS ADC2 Whole population (N=126) SG → T-DXd (N=94) T-DXd→SG (N=32) 4.5 (95%CI [3.4-5.1]) 2.7 (95%CI [2.1-3.3] HR-/HER2low (N=82) having received SG as ADC1 then T-DXd as ADC2 4.8 (95%CI [3.8-5.1]) 3.3 (95%CI [2.5-3.7]) HR+/HER2low (n=27) having received T-DXd as ADC1 then SG as ADC2 2.7 (95%CI [2.0-3.2]) 2.0 (95%CI [1.6-NR]) Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest cohort evaluating the efficacy of subsequent ADCs administration in HER2low MBC. In these heavily pre-treated pts, subsequent use of ADCs seem to be associated with shortened PFS in both HR+/HR- subgroups, independently of their administration order. Data will be updated and completed for the meeting. Moreover, the number of eligible pts will be increased. Table 1: median TPP and PFS2 in whole population and HR subgroups Citation Format: François Poumeaud, Mathilde Morisseau, Luc Cabel, Anthony Gonçalves, Charlène Rivier, Olivier Trédan, Elsa Volant, Jean Sebastien FRENEL, Sylvain Ladoire, William Jacot, Mathieu Jamelot, Hervé Fokatichoue, Luis Teixeira, Francois-Clement Bidard, Delphine Loirat, Christelle Levy, Bastien Cabarrou, Antoine Deleuze, Elise Deluche, Thomas Grellety, Frédéric Fiteni, Hervé Bischoff, Roman Vion, Stéphanie Becourt, Thibaut Reverdy, Alexandre de Nonneville, Florence Dalenc. Efficacy of Sacituzumab-Govitecan (SG) post Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and vice versa for HER2low advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): a French multicentre retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS08-02.

Abstract 7658: Artificial intelligence-powered spatial analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic biomarker for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression alone has limited predictive value for pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and platinum (PFP) therapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). An artificial intelligence (AI)-powered spatial tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) analyzer may provide independent prognostic information. Methods: This study included 63 patients with locally incurable HNSCC who received first-line PFP at Samsung Medical Center. Patients were classified into inflamed phenotype (IP) or non-inflamed phenotype (NIP) based on the 5% proportion threshold of inflamed 1 mm2-sized grids over total grids within hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images (WSIs) analyzed using Lunit SCOPE IO. We evaluated the prognostic value of inflamed status and densities of intratumoral TILs (iTILs), stromal TILs (sTILs), and tumor microenvironment TILs (tTILs). Results: Patients were predominantly male (78%). The median age at PFP initiation was 57 years. The most common primary tumor site was oral cavity (49.2%), followed by oropharynx (16%) and hypopharynx (10%). Of the 37 patients with available PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), 2 (5%), 23 (62%), and 12 (32%) had CPS values of &amp;lt;1, 1-19, and ≥20, respectively. The overall response rate was 54%, with 67% in the CPS ≥20 subgroup and 48% in the CPS &amp;lt;20 subgroup. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months, with 10.8 months for patients with CPS ≥20 and 5.5 months for patients with CPS &amp;lt;20. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.6 months. Among 62 patients with available WSIs, 47 (74%) and 15 (26%) patients were categorized as having an IP and NIP, respectively. Oral cavity cancer was enriched with IP (57.4% of all IP cases vs 26.7% of all NIP cases), while all four paranasal sinus tumors had NIP. The overall response rate was 57% in the IP group and 44% in the NIP group. Patients with IP had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients with NIP, both in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] for PFS, 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.78; P = 0.007; HR for OS, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.2-0.95; P = 0.036) and PD-L1 CPS-adjusted analyses (HR for PFS, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.79; P = 0.008; HR for OS, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.18-0.89; P = 0.025). High densities (≥25th percentile) of iTILs, sTILs, and tTILs were all significantly associated with prolonged PFS after CPS adjustment (P = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.012). High density of iTILs was also significantly associated with improved OS (P = 0.001 after CPS adjustment), while there was no significant association between OS and high density of sTILs or tTILs (0.077 and 0.085, respectively, after CPS adjustment). Conclusion: An AI-driven spatial TIL analyzer might serve as a simple and independent prognostic biomarker in HNSCC patients receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Citation Format: Sehhoon Park, Junghoon Shin, Chan-Young Ock, Chang Ho Ahn, Hyun Ae Jung, Se-Hoon Lee, Myung-Ju Ahn. Artificial intelligence-powered spatial analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic biomarker for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7658.

Impact of immunotherapy time-of-day infusion on survival and immunologic correlates in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter cohort analysis

BackgroundRecent studies have demonstrated that earlier time-of-day infusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic melanoma and...

Romidepsin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone Versus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the Ro-CHOP Trial.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The primary analysis of the Ro-CHOP phase III randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01796002) established that romidepsin (Ro) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) did not yield an increased efficacy compared with CHOP alone as first-line treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We report the planned final analysis 5 years after the last patient enrolled. With a median follow-up of 6 years, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months compared with 10.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.005]; P = .054), while median overall survival was 62.2 months (35.7-86.6 months) and 43.8 months (30.1-70.2 months; HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.14]; P = .324) in the Ro-CHOP and CHOP arms, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, the median PFS in the centrally reviewed follicular helper T-cell lymphoma subgroup was significantly longer in the Ro-CHOP arm (19.5 v 10.6 months, HR, 0.703 [95% CI, 0.502 to 0.985]; P = .039). Second-line treatments were given to 251 patients with a median PFS2 and OS2 after relapse or progression of 3.3 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Within the limits of highly heterogeneous second-line treatments, no specific regimen seemed to provide superior disease control. However, a potential benefit was observed with brentuximab vedotin in association with chemotherapy even after excluding anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtype or after adjusting for histology and international prognostic index in a multivariate model (HR for PFS, 0.431 [95% CI, 0.238 to 0.779]; P = .005).

Updated pooled analyses of first-line anti-PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

366 Background: Advanced and metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Recently, several studies demonstrated the clinical benefit of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chemotherapy (CT), leading to its approval in the first-line setting. Since then, efforts have been made to identify the patients who may benefit the most or not from the combination of ICI plus CT. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials investigating first-line ICI plus chemotherapy (CT) for advanced or metastatic ESCC patients. Outcomes of interest included: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and OS according to gender, PD-L1 expression (&lt;1% / ≥1%), and PD-L1 CPS (&lt;10 / ≥10). We used I2 statistics to assess heterogeneity, and the fixed-effect model was used to pool studies. Results: Eight studies were included with 4,702 patients. Of them, most had an ECOG 0 or 1, and were younger than 65 years (62%), male (77%), and Asian (78%). Metastatic disease was diagnosed in 75% of patients. ICI plus CT was administered to 58%, and 43% received CT +/- placebo. Median follow-up ranged from 7.1 to 22.6 months. ICI plus CT significantly improved all efficacy outcomes compared to CT alone: decreasing the risk of death by 32% (HR for OS: 0.68; 95%CI 0.63-0.74; p&lt;0.00001); reducing the risk of progression or death by 38% (HR for PFS: 0.62; 95%CI 0.58-0.67; p&lt;0.00001); and increasing the objective response rate (risk difference: 0.17; 95%CI 0.14-0.20; p&lt;0.00001). A survival benefit was seen across all subgroup analyses, but it was significantly higher in patients with PD-L1 ≥1% compared to those with PD-L1 &lt;1% (reduction in the risk of death of 38% versus 23% respectively, p=0.03). OS was not significantly different between males versus females, or PD-L1 CPS≥10 versus CPS&lt;10. Conclusions: Our large systematic review and meta-analysis support the efficacy and survival benefit of ICI plus CT as first-line therapy for all ESCC patients, regardless of gender or PD-L1 expression.

Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced biliary tract cancer: Results from a randomized proof-of-concept phase II trial (IMbrave151).

435 Background: VEGF blockade coupled with cytotoxic chemotherapy can promote an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment that augments response to PD-L1 inhibition. IMbrave151 (NCT04677504) is a randomized, double-blinded, global proof-of-concept Phase II study evaluating atezolizumab (atezo), bevacizumab (bev) and cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Here we report updated clinical data and molecular correlates of response and resistance. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated aBTC were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo (1200 mg every 3 weeks [q3w]) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w) or placebo (plb) + CisGem (Cis 25 mg/m2 and Gem 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 q3w) for up to 8 cycles, followed by atezo (1200 mg q3w) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w) or plb until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. The final OS analysis was done when ≈90 deaths occurred or when all pts had ≥2 years of follow-up. Transcriptome analysis (n=98) and mutation profiling (n=103) were done on baseline tumor samples. This was a signal-seeking trial to estimate the treatment effect in each arm with no formal hypothesis testing. Results: In total, 162 pts were randomized to either atezo + bev + CisGem (atezo/bev; n=79) or atezo + plb + CisGem (atezo/plb; n=83). The updated PFS HR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.95) in favor of atezo/bev. Updated median PFS was 8.35 mo for atezo/bev and 7.9 mo for atezo/plb, with 6-mo rates of 78% and 63%, respectively. The updated OS HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.64, 1.47), with a median of 14.9 mo for atezo/bev and 14.6 mo for atezo/plb. Confirmed ORR was 26.6% for atezo/bev and 26.5% for atezo/plb, with median DORs of 10.28 (95% CI: 6.7, 16.7) and 6.18 mo (95% CI: 4.3, 6.7), respectively. The incidence of Grade 3/4 adverse events was 73% with atezo/bev and 74% with atezo/plb. High VEGFA gene expression was associated with an improved PFS (HR, 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.83) and OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.4) in favor of atezo/bev. Hepatocytes high gene signature also was associated with an improved PFS (HR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.92) and OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.31, 1.4) in favor of atezo/bev. Pts with PI3k/AKT pathway mutations appeared to have worse OS than pts without mutations (HR, 3.7; 95% CI: 1.5, 9.1) with atezo/bev. Conclusions: Final analysis of the IMbrave151 study indicates a modest PFS benefit in intent-to-treat pts combining atezo with bev and chemotherapy. The trial is limited by small numbers and a non-comparative design. Exploratory analysis of correlative biomarkers suggests that high VEGF-A gene expression and hepatocytes high gene signature may be predictive markers of benefit with atezo/bev, warranting further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT04677504 .

C-MET-positive circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA as independent prognostic factors in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundEndocrine therapy resistance in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer (BC) is a significant clinical challenge that poses several unmet needs in the management of the disease. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of c-MET-positive circulating tumor cells (cMET+ CTCs), ESR1/PIK3CA mutations, and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC).MethodsNinety-seven patients with HR+ mBC were prospectively enrolled during standard treatment at Samsung Medical Center. CTCs were isolated from blood using GenoCTC® and EpCAM or c-MET CTC isolation kits. PIK3CA and ESR1 hotspot mutations were analyzed using droplet digital PCR. CfDNA concentrations were calculated using internal control copies from the ESR1 mutation test. Immunocytochemistry was performed to compare c-MET overexpression between primary and metastatic sites.ResultsThe proportion of c-MET overexpression was significantly higher in metastatic sites than in primary sites (p = 0.00002). Survival analysis showed that c-MET+ CTC, cfDNA concentration, and ESR1 mutations were significantly associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.0026, 0.0021, and 0.0064, respectively) in HR+/HER2− mBC. By contrast, EpCAM-positive CTC (EpCAM+ CTC) and PIK3CA mutations were not associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in HR+/HER2− mBC. Multivariate analyses revealed that c-MET+ CTCs and cfDNA concentration were independent predictors of PFS in HR+/HER2− mBC.ConclusionsMonitoring c-MET+ CTC, rather than assessing c-MET expression in the primary BC site, could provide valuable information for predicting disease progression, as c-MET expression can change during treatment. The c-MET+ CTC count and cfDNA concentration could provide complementary information on disease progression in HR+ /HER2− mBC, highlighting the importance of integrated liquid biopsy.

Long non-coding RNA as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Recently, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been applied as biomarkers for melanoma patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of lncRNAs. We used the keywords 'lncRNA' and 'melanoma' to search databases for studies published before June 14th, 2023. The specificity, sensitivity and AUC were utilized to assess diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic value was assessed using overall survival, progression-free survival and disease-free survival hazard ratios. After screening 1191 articles, we included seven studies in the diagnostic evaluation section and 17 studies in the prognosis evaluation section. The Reitsma bivariate model estimated a cumulative sensitivity of 0.724 (95% CI: 0.659-0.781, p < 0.001) and specificity of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.752-0.859, p < 0.001). The pooled AUC was 0.780 (95% CI: 0.749-0.811, p < 0.0001). The HR for overall survival was 2.723 (95% CI: 2.259-3.283, p < 0.0001). Two studies reported an HR for overall survival less than one, with an HR of 0.348 (95% CI: 0.200-0.607, p < 0.0002). The HR for progression-free survival was 2.913 (95% CI: 2.050-4.138, p < 0.0001). Four studies reported an HR less than one, with an HR of 0.457 (95% CI: 0.256-0.817). The HR for disease-free survival was 2.760 (95% CI: 2.009-3.792, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the expression of lncRNAs in melanoma patients affects survival and prognosis. LncRNAs can also be employed as diagnostic biomarkers.

Autologous stem cell transplant for refractory and relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study in China.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and prognostic factors of high-dose therapy/autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in treating refractory and relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (R/R PTCL). Methods We included medical records from 48 R/R PTCL patients treated with HDT/ASCT at the Beijing Cancer Hospital from January 2003 to December 2021, and these patients were followed up. Results We followed up with patients for a median of 71.0 months (interquartile range 48.8-124.4 months). The progression-free survival (PFS) at five years was 43.4%, and the five-year overall survival (OS) was 54.7. The five-year PFS and subgroups were as follows: 14 patients with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (57.1%, 62.9%), 14 patients with NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) (28.6%, 28.6%), nine with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (44.4%, 51.9%), and 11 with PTCL not otherwise specified (41.6%, 80.8%). Univariate analysis revealed that females had a better PFS than males (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.301, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.091-0.996, P = 0.049); the NKTCL type had worse OS than the non-NKTCL type (HR = 0.292, 95% CI 0.122-0.698, P = 0.006); the patients with the relapsed disease did better than those with refractory disease (HR for PFS: 0.161, 95% CI 0.072-0.357, P < 0.001; HR for OS: 0.171, 95% CI 0.066-0.444, P < 0.001). The PIT score was significantly better for T-cell lymphoma with score = 0 than for score ≥ 1 group (HR for PFS: 0.261, 95% CI 0.109-0.625, P = 0.003; HR for OS: 0.305, 95% CI 0.111-0.842, P = 0.022). The pre-transplantation disease status also influences survival. Patients who achieved complete response (CR) did better (HR for PFS: 0.104, 95% CI 0.044-0.247, P < 0.001; HR for OS: 0.139, 95% CI 0.050-0.383, P < 0.001). Pre-transplantation status was an independent influencing factor associated with PFS and OS (better survival in those achieving CR) (HR for PFS: 0.126, 95% CI 0.030-0.530, P = 0.005; HR for OS: 0.154, 95% CI 0.040-0.603, P = 0.007); the pathological classification independently influenced OS (better in the those with non-NKTCL) (HR = 0.210, 95% CI 0.081-0.549, P = 0.001). CR, with a PIT score of 0 (n = 17), was associated with more prolonged PFS. None of the 48 patients experienced HDT/ASCT-related deaths. Conclusion HDT/ASCT as a salvage therapy for R/R PTCL patients can partially improve outcomes with a favorable safety profile. Prospective, randomized, and controlled studies are necessary to validate the value of HDT/ASCT for patients with diverse pathological subtypes and pre-transplantation states.