Progression-free Survival In Cohort Research Articles

Combination Targeted Therapy with Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib in Progressive, Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancers.

Lenvatinib, a potent multikinase inhibitor, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; however, most patients experience disease progression, warranting further therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in these patients. We enrolled patients with progressive, RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who were either naïve to multikinase inhibitors (cohort 1) or who had progressed on lenvatinib (cohort 2). Patients received oral lenvatinib daily (cohort 1, 20 mg; cohort 2, dose at progression) and intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days. In cohorts 1 and 2, 30 and 27 patients were enrolled, respectively. Adverse events were consistent with those observed in other cancers. In cohort 1, the confirmed overall response rate was 65.5%. There were no complete responses (primary endpoint). The 12- and 18-month PFS were 72.0% and 58.0%, respectively, and the median PFS was 26.8 months. In cohort 2, the confirmed overall response rate was 16% (primary endpoint), and the median PFS was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.0-17.9 months). Tumor histology, driver mutations, and immune-related biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression, thyroid-specific antibody levels, and CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltrate, did not correlate with response to therapy. Increased baseline peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were associated with a worse PFS in cohort 1. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may enhance the durability of lenvatinib monotherapy in lenvatinib-naïve patients. Furthermore, the addition of pembrolizumab may be a viable salvage therapy for patients who have progressed on lenvatinib.

Effect of triplet regimen (single-agent chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) on survival compared to chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: A retrospective analysis.

e16132 Background: TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials have demonstrated the survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). Although the ABC‐06 study proved the benefits of FOLFOX in 2nd line therapies, the efficacy is limited. There is no consensus regarding the optimal therapy regimen, and more effective therapeutic options are needed. This retrospective analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of a triplet regimen compared to standard chemotherapy in 2nd line BTC. Methods: Pts > 18 years, with ECOG PS 0/1, histologically confirmed metastatic BTC and progression on 1st line Gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. A triple regimen was referred as Cohort A: tislelizumab and other anti-PD-1 antibody, capecitabine or S-1 plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs, lenvatinib or anlotinib). Standard chemotherapy was Cohort B: mFOLFOX or irinotecan plus capecitabine. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: This study retrospectively collected and analyzed treatment and clinical information from 121 pretreated BTC pts from Oct. 2021 to Oct. 2023, with a median age of 60 (range 36-82) years and 48% (58) of the pts were female. Among them, 86 patients received the triple regimen, while 35 patients received standard chemotherapy. Pts’characteristics were well balanced between the two groups in terms of gender, age, ECOG score, primary site, CEA, CA199, or presence of distant metastasis. According to the RECIST1.1 criteria, 1 pt achieved CR and 31 pts had PR in the triple treatment cohort, ORR reached 37.2% (95%CI 27.0-48.3%), which was significantly higher than the 2.8% (95%CI 0.1-14.9%) in the standard chemotherapy cohort (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, the DCR of the two groups were 89.5% (95%CI 81.1-95.1%) and 71.4% (95%CI 53.7-85.4%) respectively. As of Oct 31, 2023, all patients developed progression, and the median PFS in cohort A was 6 months, compared to 2.0 months in cohort B (HR, 0.29, 95%CI 0.16-0.52, p < 0.0001). 64 patients of cohort A and 28 patients of cohort B developed death. The median OS in cohort A was 16.0 months, compared to 6.0 months in cohort B (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19~0.64, p < 0.0001). Any grade TRAEs occurred in 54.7% pts of cohort A and 42.9% of cohort B. Most common grade 3 TRAEs were hypohepatia (19.8%), hand-foot syndrome (11.6%), gastrointestinal reaction (1.2%) in cohort A, and hypohepatia (8.6%), hand-foot syndrome (2.9%) in cohort B. Conclusions: The retrospective analysis suggests that the triple regimen as second-line treatment for advanced BTC pts may help improve the efficacy and survival, and is worthy of further prospective exploration.

Abstract PO1-06-12: Phase II study of sitravatinib plus tislelizumab with or without nab-paclitaxel in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: The combination of a PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity as first-line therapy for patients (pts) with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic PD-L1 positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, for pts without PD-L1 expression and for those who have failed prior lines of treatment, therapeutic options are still limited. This multi-cohort, phase II trial aimed to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of 70 mg (cohort A) or 100 mg (cohort B) sitravatinib plus tislelizumab in pts with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC, and their combination (70 mg sitravatinib plus tislelizumab) with nab-paclitaxel in untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC pts (cohort C). The efficacy of sitravatinib plus tislelizumab in cohort A and B has been reported with objective response rate (ORR) of 38.1% and 45.0%, respectively. Herein, the preliminary results of cohort C and updated results of cohort A and B were reported. Methods: Pts with untreated locally inoperable or metastatic TNBC were included in cohort C and received 70 mg sitravatinib orally once daily plus 200 mg tislelizumab intravenously on day 1 and 100mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel on days 1 and 8 every three weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), 1-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety/tolerability. Based on Simon’s two-stage design, > 9 responders were need in stage 1 (n=18) for the study to continue, and >19 responders were needed by the end of study (n=35) to demonstrate statistical superiority with sitravatinib plus tislelizumab and nab-paclitaxel (assumed to be around 65%) to a historical control of 46% (1-sided alpha of 0.1, power of 80%). Updated analyses were provided for cohort A (Simon’s 2 stage design) and B (Bayesian optimal phase II design). Results: Among the 18 pts in stage 1 of cohort C, 12 of them achieved confirmed response, and therefore the study proceeded to the enrollment in stage 2. As of April 30, 2023, a total of 32 pts were enrolled, with a median age of 51 years. Among the 23 efficacy evaluable pts, unconfirmed ORR was 87.0% (95% CI 66.4-97.2) (including 3 CRs and 17 PRs), with 7 pts not reaching next tumor assessment after reaching CR/PR, and confirmed ORR was 52.2% (95% CI 30.6-73.2). DCR was 95.7%. Any grade of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 31 (96.9%) pts, and grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 5 (15.6%) pts. One (3.1%) patient experienced grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events. SAEs were reported in 3 (9.4%) pts. At the data cut-off date, the median follow-up duration for cohort A and B was 20.4 (range 1.3–24.3) months and 13.3 (range 5.1-19.1) months, respectively. The median PFS in cohort A was 8.2 (95% CI 2.8-12.4) months, and in cohort B was 5.4 (95% CI 4.2-10.9) months. Median OS was not reached in both cohorts. RNA-seq analysis showed that the suppression of immune regulatory pathways and the activation of metabolic pathways promoted early progression. Besides, baseline angiogenesis associated pathway held the potential to predict the favorable response to tislelizumab plus sitravatinib. Conclusion: In the first-line treatment of locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC, preliminary analysis of cohort C showed that sitravatinib combined with tislelizumab and nab-paclitaxel had promising anti-tumor activity with a high ORR, and the combination was generally well tolerated. In TNBC pts with less than three lines of therapy, the chemotherapy-free regimen with sitravatinib plus tislelizumab demonstrated promising PFS after a longer follow-up duration. Citation Format: Lei Fan, Xiyu Liu, Ying Xu, Xinyi Sui, Wenjuan Zhang, Linxiaoxi Ma, Xi Jin, Song-Yang Wu, Han Wang, Yi Xiao, Li Chen, Jiong Wu, Ke-da Yu, Guangyu Liu, Xin Hu, Zhonghua Wang, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao. Phase II study of sitravatinib plus tislelizumab with or without nab-paclitaxel in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-12.

Brazilian Non-Hodgkin T Cell Registry: An Exploratory Analysis of Extranodal Sites

Introduction: T cell lymphomas (NHL-T) account for 10-15% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). They are a heterogeneous group of infrequent neoplasms with a variable clinical course but prevalently aggressive behavior and high mortality rates. Diagnosis is still challenging and there has been little change in the overall prognosis over the last two decades. In spite of IPI (International Prognostic Index) that include extranodal (EN) site in its variables, lack is known regarding EN involvement in nodal peripheral T cell lymphomas- PTCL (PTCL-NOS, TFH and ALCL ALK+/ALK-) location or impact on prognosis). Objective: We aim to evaluate number of extranodal (EN) sites in nodal PTCL lymphomas (PTCL-NOS, TFH and ALCL ALK+/ALK-) and its specific location as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Also generate hypothesis for further molecular analysis. Methodology: Brazil T-cell project is a national, ambispective study of patients with histological diagnosis of PTCL diagnosed from January 2015 to December 2022. Approval for the study was obtained at the coordinating center (Samaritano Hospital - São Paulo) and at each participating center as per the institutional standard before initiation. Those selected for the study were previously untreated patients age ≥ 19 years, with de novo PTCL or natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. At each institution, the local pathologist reviewed the diagnose. Clinical information included coded patient and site identifiers, sex, date of birth, date and site of diagnostic biopsy, sites of disease, EN (location and number), methodology of staging (clinical, CT or Pet) and Ann Arbor stage. Initial therapy and response; details of remission, progression, or relapse; and subsequent therapies, along with survival status and cause of death. Treatment outcome was determined by OS and PFS. REDcap Platform (by Vanderbilt) has been used to collect and store data and for descriptive analysis the IBM-SPSS version 24 was applied. Kaplan-Meier method estimated the OS, whereas Log-Rank tests to compare its curves. This trial is registered at Clinical trials (NCT03207789). Results: Of 621 registered we selected 198 patients (pts) diagnosed with nodal PTCL with at least one EN involvement [Cohort 1 EN involvement equal to one (148 pts) and Cohort 2 EN involvement ³ 2 (50 patients)]. Considering all 198 pts (Cohort 1 and 2) there was a slight male predominance (63%); median age 53 years; 79% were staged III or IV; 81.5 were IPI 2 or more. Most frequently histology was PTCL-NOS (46%), followed by ALCL ALK+ (32%), ALCL ALK- (12.5%) and TFH (9.5%). The majority had B Symptoms (63%); 37.5% had Bone Marrow infiltration. The chemotherapy most frequently chosen were CHOEP (54.5%) followed by CHOP (19.5%). Transplant was used as consolidation in 20% of the cases. Almost half of patients achieved complete response after first line (44%), although 38% relapsed. Cohort 1 (EN=1) and 2 (EN ³ 2) were similar regarding clinical characteristics, except, for stage III-IV (73% vs 96%; p <.0001); IPI ³ 3 (37.5% vs. 82%; p <.0001) and ECOG (22 vs. 48%; p=.001), respectively. Therefore, translating in a more advanced disease in Cohort 2. The most common extranodal location in Cohort 1 (EN=1) was Skin/ Subcutaneous (35%), followed by gastrointestinal tract (18%) and lung (16%). NHL-T subtypes behaved similarly in this EN exploratory analysis, with a better OS and PFS in ALCL ALK+, followed by ALK- and PTCL-NOS. There was no difference in PFS in Cohort 1 (EN=1) and 2 (EN ³ 2), but there was a slight difference in Overall survival (55% vs. 42% in 12 months; p=0.06), suggesting EN sites involvement assessed by CT and PET-CT as possible surrogate for outcomes in this population. Conclusion: NHL-T is still unmet medical need considering suboptimal outcome in treatment and survival. New biological and clinical finding are still necessary to adequate stratify this group of patients, considering poor performance of IPI and PIT scores. Number and location of EN sites involvement may be a possible surrogate for outcome, which can be a reflect of a distinct biology, that needs further investigation. Registries are of importance considering rarity and poor prognosis of this diseases and an adequate instrument to hypothesis generation.

Frequency of peripheral PD-1+regulatory T cells is associated with treatment responses to PARP inhibitor maintenance in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are becoming the standard of care for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Recently, clinical trials of triple maintenance therapy (PARPi+anti-angiogenic agent+anti-PD-1/L1) are actively ongoing. Here, we investigated the immunological effects of PARPi or triple maintenance therapy on T cells and their impact on clinical responses. We collected serial blood from EOC patients receiving PARPi therapy (cohort 1: PARPi, n = 49; cohort 2: olaparib+bevacizumab+pembrolizumab, n = 31). Peripheral T cells were analyzed using flow cytometry and compared according to the PARPi response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed according to prognostic biomarkers identified in a comparative analysis. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) were suppressed by PARPi therapy, whereas PD-1 was not significantly changed. Short PFS group exhibited a higher percentage of baseline PD-1+Tregs than long PFS group, and the patients with high percentage of PD-1+Tregs before treatment showed poor PFS in cohort 1. However, the expression of PD-1 on Tregs significantly decreased after receiving triple maintenance therapy, and the reduction in PD-1+Tregs was associated with superior PFS in cohort 2 (P = 0.0078). PARPi suppresses Tregs, but does not affect PD-1 expression. Adding anti-PD-1 to PARPi decreases PD-1+Tregs, which have negative prognostic value for PARPi monotherapy.

17th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma, Palazzo dei Congressi, Lugano, Switzerland, 13 - 17 June, 2023.

Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive but potentially curable lymphoma. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard first-line regimen with cure rates nearing 60%. Over the last years many efforts have been made aiming at improving outcomes of first line therapy but none has resulted in improved overall survival over R-CHOP. Recently, genetic subtypes of DLBCL that go beyond the cell-of-origin and have distinct biology, clinical characteristics and different likelihood of response to specific therapies have been identified. One of these entities is represented by the MCD subtype harboring either the MYD88 L265P mutation, the CD79A/B mutation, or both. MCD has a dismal outcome when treated with R-CHOP but is sensitive to BTK inhibition. In addition to the genetic definition of specific subtypes, the possibility to use circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) response assessment together with PET-response may establishe a new strategy for treatment decisions in patients with DLBCL. Methods: SAKK 38/19 (NCT04604067) is an ongoing exploratory multicohort phase II trial in patients (pts) with previously untreated DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS). Adult pts with CD20-positive DLBCL NOS, ECOG performance status 0–2, candidates for 6 cycles of R-CHOP are eligible. At baseline, a liquid biopsy is perfomed and pts with MCD subtype are treated with the combination of R-CHOP plus acalabrutinib for 6 cycles (cohort A). Non-MCD pts receive 2 cycles of R-CHOP and based on the combined PET and ctDNA response assessment after cycle 2 they are allocated to one of three different cohorts: R-CHOP for 4 additional cycles in combination with acalabrutinib followed by 2 months of acalabrutinib single-agent (cohort B); 2 additional cycles of R-CHOP and 2 administrations of single-agent rituximab (cohort C); 4 additional cycles of R-CHOP (cohort D). Co-primary endpoints of the trial are: Progression free survival (PFS) (in Cohorts A, C and D) and complete remission (CR) rate (in Cohort B) Secondary endpoints: Adverse events in the cohorts treated with acalabrutinib-R-CHOP; overall survival; PFS in cohort B; CR rate in cohorts A, C and D; overall response rate; duration of response. The research was funded by: -Astra Zeneca -Hubacher Fund Keywords: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, liquid biopsy, ongoing trials Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract A. Stathis Honoraria: Eli Lilly, Bayer, Roche, Novartis, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca Research funding: ADC Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Bayer, Eli Lilly, MEI Pharma, Cellestia, Debiopharm Group, Merck/MSD, Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Loxo, and Philogen F. Hitz Consultant or advisory role Abbvie, Takeda and Roche G. Gritti Consultant or advisory role Roche, Takeda, Kite-Gilead, Ideogen, Genmab Educational grants: Janssen, Beigene, Sandoz Other remuneration: Clinigen, Ideogen, Beigene, Incyte, Novartis T. Zenz Honoraria: Roche, Abbvie, AZD, Beigene, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis

Efficacy and safety in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma using atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in later-line: A retrospective analysis of real-world evidence.

e16173 Background: As far, no data has been published about later-line application of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (T+A) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods: We retrospectively recruited uHCC patients who treated with later-line T+A. Efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), in accordance with RECIST v1.1. Safety was evaluated with CTCAE v5.0. We also continually enrolled uHCC patients who received later-line regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors (Reg+PD-1) as a comparison. Results: Total 33 patients were continually included, 12 used T+A and 21 chose Reg+PD-1. Baseline performance status, liver function and BCLC tumor stage were similar between two cohorts. At data cut-off at February 2023, following median following-up at 18.9 months, median OS in cohort T+A and Reg+PD-1 were 8.2 (95%CI: 5.8-10.6) vs 15.6 (95%CI: 7.6-23.6) (p = 0.237). Median PFS in cohort T+A and Reg+PD-1were 5.1 (95%CI: 1.1-9.1) vs 3.5 (95%CI: 2.1-4.9) (p = 0.575). OS rate and PFS rate are listed. None of efficacy endpoints reached statistical difference. All patients suffered from AEs. No AEs-related death occurred. Conclusions: Efficacy and safety of later-line T+A in uHCC patients was similar with those who used regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors, which needed to be further confirmed. [Table: see text]

Abstract OT2-16-02: Open-label, phase 3b/4 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with or without baseline brain metastasis with advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: DESTINY-Breast12

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC) have a high incidence (up to 50%) of brain metastasis (BM) despite advances in treatment (Zimmer AS et al. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020;e1274; Hurvitz SA et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2433-2441). Although several agents have been studied in pts with HER2+ BC with BM, an unmet medical need remains. In DESTINY-Breast01, T-DXd demonstrated efficacy in the overall population and preliminary efficacy in a pt subgroup with stable BM (n=24), with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 61.4%, an extracranial confirmed ORR by independent central review (ICR) of 58.3%, respectively, and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 19.4 and 18.1 months, respectively (Modi S et al. Cancer Res. 2021. Abst PD3-06; Jerusalem G et al. Ann Oncol. 2020. Abst 138O). T-DXd also demonstrated preliminary efficacy in a subgroup of pts with BM in the DESTINY-Breast03 trial, with an extracranial ORR of 67.4%, intracranial ORR of 63.9%, and median PFS of 15.0 months (Hurvitz S et al. SABCS 2021. Abst GS3-01). However, both trials excluded pts with active/progressive BM. Here we describe a trial evaluating T-DXd in a real-world setting in pts with stable or active BM and pts without BM with previously treated advanced/metastatic HER2+ BC. The data generated by this study will complement previous and ongoing studies, providing a more robust understanding of T-DXd treatment in patients with and without BM. Trial design: DESTINY-Breast12 (NCT04739761) is an open-label, multicenter, international (91 sites in the US, Europe, Australia, Canada, and Japan), phase 3b/4 study assessing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks in pts with HER2+ BC ± BM. As part of prescreening, all pts will provide informed consent for tumor tissue samples (archival tumor tissue or fresh biopsy) to be collected and tested for HER2 status. Pts will be enrolled in 1 of 2 cohorts (250 pts each): cohort 1 (no BM at baseline) and cohort 2 (BM at baseline). Pts must have previously treated HER2-positive BC that has progressed on or after ≥1 prior anti-HER2–based regimen (including disease progression ≤6 months after adjuvant treatment with HER2-targeted therapies) and received ≤2 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting (excluding pts with prior tucatinib). Cohort 1 will be limited to include ≤25% third-line pts. Pts with BM must have untreated BM not needing immediate local therapy or previously treated stable or progressing BM. Primary endpoints are ORR in cohort 1 and PFS in cohort 2 (both by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1 per ICR). Secondary endpoints in both cohorts are overall survival, DOR, time to progression, duration of subsequent therapy, PFS2, safety, and changes in symptoms, functioning, and quality of life. Incidence of new symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is a secondary endpoint in cohort 1, and ORR and CNS ORR by RECIST 1.1 per ICR, CNS PFS and DOR, and time to new CNS metastasis are secondary endpoints in cohort 2. Citation Format: Nancy U. Lin, Eva Ciruelos, Guy Jerusalem, Volkmar Müller, Naoki Niikura, Giuseppe Viale, Emma Oscroft, Shawn Anand, Manoj Prahladan, Nadia Harbeck. Open-label, phase 3b/4 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with or without baseline brain metastasis with advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast cancer: DESTINY-Breast12 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-16-02.

Efficacy and Safety of Befotertinib (D-0316) in Patients With EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC That Had Progressed After Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study

IntroductionBefotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This study evaluated befotertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who developed an EGFR T790M mutation after progression on first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy. MethodsThis was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study at 49 hospitals across mainland China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutations with disease progression after prior first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75 to 100 mg (cohort B) once daily. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee in intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03861156. ResultsA total of 176 patients and 290 patients were included in cohorts A (50 mg) and B (75–100 mg), respectively. At data cutoff (August 15, 2021), independent review committee–assessed ORR was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.9%–72.9%) in cohort B. The investigator-assessed ORR was 54.0% (95% CI: 46.3%–61.5%) in cohort A and 65.9% (95% CI: 60.1%–71.3%) in cohort B. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 11.0 (95% CI: 9.6–12.5) months in cohort A and 12.5 (95% CI: 11.1–13.8) months in cohort B. The median independent review committee–assessed progression-free survival in cohort B was 16.6 (95% CI: 15.0–not evaluable [NE]) months. The intracranial ORR was 26.7% (95% CI: 7.8%–55.1%) in cohort A by investigator assessment, while 57.1% (95% CI: 34.0%–78.2%) and 55.9% (95% CI: 37.9%–72.8%) in cohort B by investigator and independent review committee assessment, respectively. The median investigator-assessed intracranial progression-free survival was 16.5 (95% CI: 8.6–NE) months in cohort A, while the median intracranial progression-free survival was not evaluable in cohort B due to immature data regardless of investigator or independent review committee assessment. and NE (95% CI: 13.8–NE) in cohort B. The overall survival was immature. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 20.5% and 11.4% of patients in cohort A and in 29.3% and 10.0% of patients in cohort B, respectively. ConclusionsBefotertinib of 75 to 100 mg has satisfying efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring T790M mutation with resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. A phase 3 randomized trial is underway (NCT04206072).

Abstract P1-18-08: Effect of duration of prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy (≤6 mo or >6 mo) on alpelisib benefit in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC) from BYLieve

Abstract Introduction: PIK3CA (encoding phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase alpha [PI3Kα]) is a driver oncogene mutated (mut) in ~40% of HR+, HER2- ABCs, leading to endocrine therapy (ET) resistance and poor prognosis. Alpelisib (ALP) is the first oral α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader approved in this patient (pt) population. Primary analyses of Cohorts A and B from BYLieve, an ongoing Phase II noncomparative study, demonstrated efficacy and a consistent safety profile of ALP + ET (fulvestrant [FUL] or letrozole [LET]) in pts with PIK3CA-mut, HR+, HER2- ABC in the post CDK4/6i setting. Post hoc analyses of ALP benefit in pts with centrally confirmed PIK3CA mut, based on median duration of prior CDK4/6i, supported the efficacy of ALP + ET in CDK4/6i-resistant, HR+, HER2- ABC. Here we assessed whether those who achieved a short duration of disease control (6-month [mo] cutoff), with prior CDK4/6i + ET received clinical benefit with ALP + ET. Methods: In Cohorts A and B, pts with PIK3CA-mut, HR+, HER2- ABC had received CDK4/6i + aromatase inhibitor (AI) or FUL, respectively, as immediate prior therapy (majority in first line). Pts in Cohort A received ALP 300 mg PO QD + FUL 500 mg IM Q28D + C1D15; pts in Cohort B received ALP 300 mg PO QD + LET 2.5 mg PO QD. Within each cohort, pts were divided based on duration of prior CDK4/6i therapy (≤6 mo or >6 mo), and the association of progression-free survival (PFS) with this covariate was analyzed using a stratified log-rank test and Cox Proportional Hazards model. A 6-mo cutoff was selected based on the ESO-ESMO ABC5 cutoff for primary ET resistance, as current guidelines do not specify cutoffs for CDK4/6i resistance. This analysis is based on the PFS endpoint and included pts for whom duration of prior CDK4/6i therapy was known. Results: Of the 121 pts in Cohort A with centrally confirmed PIK3CA-mut disease (modified full analysis set, mFAS), 120 had duration of prior CDK4/6i available; 26 had CDK4/6i for ≤6 mo and 94 for >6 mo, with similar demographics/disease characteristics between subgroups. The hazard ratio (HR) of median PFS (mPFS) between the ≤6-mo group and >6-mo group was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.94), indicating a lower risk of progression in the ≤6-mo group, with mPFS 10.0 mo (95% CI, 5.55-not estimable) and 6.0 mo (95% CI, 5.16-8.31), respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 67.5% (n=85) of all pts (safety set) in Cohort A and by 76.9% (n=20)/65.0% (n=65) in the ≤6-mo/>6-mo subgroups, respectively. Of the 115 pts in Cohort B with centrally confirmed PIK3CA-mut disease (mFAS), 113 had duration of prior CDK4/6i available; 31 had CDK4/6i for ≤6 mo and 82 for >6 mo, with similar demographics/disease characteristics between subgroups. The HR of mPFS between the ≤6-mo and >6-mo groups was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.47-1.23), with the wide CI indicating no difference in risk of progression between subgroups, and mPFS was 5.9 mo (95% CI, 3.55-10.97) and 5.6 mo (95% CI, 3.68-7.10), respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs were experienced by 69.9% (n=86) of all pts (safety set) in Cohort B and by 63.6% (n=21)/72.2% (n=65) in the ≤6-mo/>6-mo subgroups, respectively. Conclusions: This demonstrates that pts with PIK3CA-mut, HR+, HER2- ABC who achieved ≤6-mo duration of disease control with prior CDK4/6i had a numerically longer PFS in Cohort A, and almost the same clinical efficacy in Cohort B, to ALP + ET vs pts with >6-mo duration of disease control, with a comparable safety profile. This confirms targeting PI3Kα with ALP provides clinical benefit in pts with CDK4/6i-resistant ABC, including early progressors, and supports consideration of ALP + ET as an immediate next-line option in this setting, possibly delaying chemotherapy. Citation Format: Stephen Chia, Eva M Ciruelos, Hope S Rugo, Florence Lerebours, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Pamela Drullinsky, Aleix Prat, Thomas Bachelot, Nicholas Turner, Ennan Gu, Christina Arce, Murat Akdere, Dejan Juric. Effect of duration of prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) therapy (≤6 mo or >6 mo) on alpelisib benefit in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC) from BYLieve [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-08.

Abstract OT2-26-01: Open-label, multinational, multicenter, phase 3b/4 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with or without baseline brain metastasis with previously treated advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC): DESTINY-Breast12

Abstract Background: HER2+ BC is associated with a high incidence (up to 50%) of brain metastasis (BM) despite advances in treatment (Zimmer AS et al. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2020;e1274; Hurvitz SA et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2433-2441). Although several agents have been studied in patients (pts) with HER2+ BC with BM, an unmet medical need remains due to the poor prognosis in this pt population. In DESTINY-Breast01, T-DXd demonstrated efficacy in the overall population and preliminary efficacy in a pt subgroup with stable BM, with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 61.4% and an extracranial confirmed ORR by independent central review (ICR) of 58.3%, respectively, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 19.4 and 18.1 mo, respectively, and median duration of response (DOR) of 20.8 and 16.9 mo, respectively (Modi S et al. Cancer Res. 2021. Abst PD3-06; Jerusalem G et al. Ann Oncol. 2020. Abst 138O). Here we describe a trial evaluating T-DXd in pts ± BM with previously treated advanced/metastatic HER2+ BC. Trial design: DESTINY-Breast12 (NCT04739761) is an open-label, multicenter, international (86 sites in the US, Europe, Australia, and Japan), phase 3b/4 study assessing the efficacy and safety of T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg q3w in pts with HER2+ BC ± BM. Pts will be enrolled in 1 of 2 cohorts (250 pts each): cohort 1 (−BM at baseline) and cohort 2 (+BM at baseline). Pts must have previously treated advanced/metastatic HER2+ BC that has progressed with ≥1 prior anti-HER2-based regimen and received ≤2 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting (excludes pts with prior tucatinib). Pts with BM must have untreated BM not needing immediate local therapy or previously treated stable or progressing BM. Primary endpoints are ORR in cohort 1 and PFS in cohort 2 (both by RECIST version 1.1 per ICR). Secondary endpoints in both cohorts are OS, DOR, time to progression, duration of subsequent therapy, PFS2, safety, and changes in symptoms, functioning, and QOL. Incidence of new symptomatic CNS metastasis (CNSM) is a secondary endpoint in cohort 1, and ORR and CNS ORR by RECIST 1.1 per ICR, CNS PFS and DOR, and time to new CNSM are secondary endpoints in cohort 2. Citation Format: Nancy U Lin, Eva Ciruelos, Guy Jerusalem, Volkmar Müller, Naoki Niikura, Giuseppe Viale, Emma Oscroft, Shawn Anand, Graham Walker, Nadia Harbeck. Open-label, multinational, multicenter, phase 3b/4 study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with or without baseline brain metastasis with previously treated advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC): DESTINY-Breast12 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-26-01.

Phase III study of local or systemic therapy INtensification DIrected by PET in prostate CAncer patients with post-prostaTEctomy biochemical recurrence (INDICATE): ECOG-ACRIN EA8191.

TPS5098 Background: Radiation therapy (RT) to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (STAD) is considered a standard of care (SOC) salvage therapy (ST) paradigm for prostate cancer (PC) patients (pts) with post-prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR). Fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging is FDA-approved in this setting, with improved accuracy for detection of metastases not identified with conventional imaging (CIM). Given PET's greater sensitivity and specificity, its findings are increasingly but variably applied to justify modification or omission of SOC therapies without high-level evidence of clinical benefit. PET may help identify candidates for local or systemic treatment intensification of the otherwise non-tailored SOC approach. Improved systemic control and disease detection with molecular imaging have led to increasing use of focally ablative metastasis-directed RT, to delay or enhance systemic therapy through increased local control. There is also interest in earlier use of systemic therapy; apalutamide (Apa) is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with established efficacy in improving overall and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) for non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic castration-sensitive PC. This study will evaluate whether pts with PET-detected lesions benefit from such local or systemic treatment intensification approaches. Methods: PC pts with post-RP BCR (PSA>0.5ng/mL; >0.2ng/mL if within 12 mos of RP) and no metastases on CIM who are candidates for SOC ST (RT to prostate bed and pelvic nodes with STAD) are eligible. Prior to study registration, pts undergo SOC baseline PET (18F-fluciclovine but PSMA radiotracers permitted pending commercial availability). Based on institutional clinical interpretation of the SOC PET, pts will be placed in Cohort 1 (PET-negative) or 2 (PET-positive for extra-pelvic metastases). Cohort 1 will be randomized to SOC ST +/- Apa for 6 months and Cohort 2 will be randomized to SOC ST and Apa +/- metastasis-directed RT to PET-positive lesions. The primary endpoint is PFS, defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression on CIM, symptomatic disease or death. Primary objectives are to evaluate whether addition of Apa to SOC ST and addition of metastasis-directed RT to SOC ST and Apa could prolong PFS in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. For Cohort 1, 480 pts will be randomized with 85% power to distinguish 5-year PFS rate of 90% (Apa arm) vs. 80% (SOC arm) using one-sided stratified log-rank test with type I error of 0.025. For Cohort 2, 324 pts will be randomized with 85% power to distinguish 5-year PFS rate of 76.5% in the experimental arm from 61.5% in the control arm. Secondary endpoints include overall and event-free survival, toxicity, and PET progression. Clinical trial information: NCT04423211.

PET-directed local or systemic therapy intensification in prostate cancer patients with post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (EA8191).

TPS267 Background: Radiation therapy (RT) to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (STAD) is considered a standard of care (SOC) salvage therapy (ST) paradigm for prostate cancer (PC) patients (pts) with post-prostatectomy (RP) biochemical recurrence (BCR). Fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging is FDA-approved in this setting, with improved accuracy for detection of metastases (mets) not identified with conventional imaging (CIM). Given greater sensitivity and specificity of PET, its findings are being increasingly but variably applied to justify modification or omission of SOC therapies without high-level evidence of clinical benefit. PET may help identify candidates for local or systemic treatment intensification of otherwise non-tailored SOC. Earlier detection of mets with molecular imaging has led to increasing use of focally ablative met-directed RT, to delay or enhance systemic therapy through better local control. There is also interest in earlier use of advanced systemic therapy; apalutamide (Apa) is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with established efficacy in improving overall and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) for non-metastatic castrate-resistant and metastatic castration-sensitive PC, and potential activity for low-volume mets. This study will evaluate whether pts with PET-detected lesions benefit from such local or systemic treatment intensification approaches. Methods: PC pts with post-RP BCR (PSA>0.5ng/mL; >0.2 if RP within 12 mos), and negative CIM who are candidates for SOC ST (RT to prostate bed and pelvic nodes + STAD) and undergo SOC baseline PET are eligible. The study will initially use 18F-fluciclovine but permit additional radiotracers based on FDA approval and availability. Based on institutional clinical interpretation of the SOC PET, pts will be placed in Cohort 1 (PET-negative) or 2 (PET-positive for extra-pelvic mets). Cohort 1 will be randomized to SOC ST +/- Apa for 6 months and Cohort 2 will be randomized to SOC ST and Apa +/- met-directed RT to PET-positive lesions. The primary endpoint is PFS, defined as time from randomization to radiographic progression on CIM, symptomatic disease or death. Primary objectives are to evaluate whether addition of Apa to SOC ST and addition of met-directed RT to SOC ST and Apa could prolong PFS in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. For Cohort 1, 480 pts will be randomized with 85% power to distinguish 5-year PFS rate of 90% (Apa arm) vs. 80% (SOC arm) using one-sided stratified logrank test with type I error of 0.025. For Cohort 2, 324 pts will be randomized with 85% power to distinguish 5-year PFS rate of 76.5% in experimental arm from 61.5% in control arm. Secondary endpoints include overall and event-free survival, toxicity, and PET progression. Trial was activated on October 8, 2020; NCT04423211. Acknowledgement: This study was conducted by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Peter J. O'Dwyer, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs) and supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under the following award numbers: U10CA180794, U10CA180820, U10CA180868, U10CA180888, U10CA180821, UG1CA233196, UG1CA233253, UG1CA233277, UG1CA233328, and UG1CA233330. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. Clinical trial information: NCT 04423211.

Association between pertuzumab-associated diarrhoea and rash and survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Exploratory analysis from the CLEOPATRA trial.

Skin rash and diarrhoea are known side-effects of pertuzumab. Studies with other anti-HER2 agents suggested that adverse events correlate with patient outcomes. In this exploratory cohort of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer included in the CLEOPATRA trial we evaluated the value of rash and diarrhoea as prognostic markers and as predictors of pertuzumab benefit. This is a retrospective analysis of the multicenter, prospective, randomised CLEOPATRA trial. We defined two analytic cohorts: cohort 1 (C1) included patients from treatment initiation, and cohort 2 (C2) included patients after discontinuation of docetaxel. A landmark analysis was introduced to deal with immortal-time bias. Study endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used. Of the 808 patients and after application of the landmark analysis, C1 and C2 included 777 and 518 patients, respectively. In C1, rash occurred in 271 patients (34.9%) and diarrhoea in 470 (60.5%). Rash was prognostic for PFS and OS (C1: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.66 [95% CI=0.48-0.91], p=0.010]; C2: aHR 0.52 [95% CI=0.30-0.89], p=0.018) in both cohorts, while diarrhoea was only prognostic for PFS in cohort 2 (aHR=0.65 [95% CI=0.46-0.91], p=0.011). Rash and diarrhoea were not predictive of pertuzumab benefit (in terms of PFS/OS) in the two cohorts. In patients treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, rash is prognostic whenever it occurs during treatment, while diarrhoea only has prognostic value when occurring after docetaxel discontinuation. However, neither rash nor diarrhoea predict pertuzumab benefit.

Efficacy of PARP Inhibition in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer is Very Different with Non-BRCA DNA Repair Alterations: Reconstructing Prespecified Endpoints for Cohort B from the Phase 3 PROfound Trial of Olaparib

The PROfound trial evaluated the PARP inhibitor olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers harboring alterations in BRCA1/2 and ATM (cohort A) and in 12 other homologous recombination repair genes (cohort B). Olaparib led to more objective responses and longer radiographic progression-free survival than the control in cohort A and when cohorts A and B were combined. The efficacy of olaparib in cohort B was a secondary objective prespecified in the trial protocol but was not reported. Reconstructing patient-level data for cohort B, two of 54 patients (4%) in the olaparib arm and two of 24 patients (8%) in the control arm had a radiographic response, and there was no evidence that olaparib prolonged radiographic progression-free survival in cohort B (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.58–1.34). These results are in strong contrast to cohort A. Patient summaryA large clinical study concluded that treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib benefits men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose tumors harbor alterations in 15 different DNA repair genes. In contrast to the group dominated by BRCA alterations, any potential benefit from olaparib was considerably less, if present at all, for men with prostate cancers harboring one of the 12 other, non-BRCA DNA repair alterations.

Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

BackgroundMultiple loss-of-function alterations in genes that are involved in DNA repair, including homologous recombination repair, are associated with response to poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition in patients with prostate and other cancers.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial evaluating the PARP inhibitor olaparib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had disease progression while receiving a new hormonal agent (e.g., enzalutamide or abiraterone). All the men had a qualifying alteration in prespecified genes with a direct or indirect role in homologous recombination repair. Cohort A (245 patients) had at least one alteration in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM; cohort B (142 patients) had alterations in any of 12 other prespecified genes, prospectively and centrally determined from tumor tissue. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to receive olaparib or the physician’s choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone (control). The primary end point was imaging-based progression-free survival in cohort A according to blinded independent central review.ResultsIn cohort A, imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the control group (median, 7.4 months vs. 3.6 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.47; P<0.001); a significant benefit was also observed with respect to the confirmed objective response rate and the time to pain progression. The median overall survival in cohort A was 18.5 months in the olaparib group and 15.1 months in the control group; 81% of the patients in the control group who had progression crossed over to receive olaparib. A significant benefit for olaparib was also seen for imaging-based progression-free survival in the overall population (cohorts A and B). Anemia and nausea were the main toxic effects in patients who received olaparib.ConclusionsIn men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had disease progression while receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone and who had alterations in genes with a role in homologous recombination repair, olaparib was associated with longer progression-free survival and better measures of response and patient-reported end points than either enzalutamide or abiraterone. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme; PROfound ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02987543.)

MONARCH plus: abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: the multinational randomized phase III study.

Aim:To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) from China, Brazil, India, and South Africa.Methods:This randomized, double-blind, phase III study was conducted between 9 December 2016 and 29 March 2019. Postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC with no prior systemic therapy in an advanced setting (cohort A) or progression on prior ET (cohort B) received abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) or placebo plus: anastrozole (1 mg/day) or letrozole (2.5 mg/day) (cohort A) or fulvestrant (500 mg per label) (cohort B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in cohort A, analyzed using the stratified log-rank test. Secondary endpoints were PFS in cohort B (key secondary endpoint), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. This interim analysis was planned after 119 PFS events in cohort A.Results:In cohort A, 207 patients were randomly assigned to the abemaciclib arm and 99 to the placebo arm. Abemaciclib significantly improved PFS versus placebo (median: not reached versus 14.7 months; hazard ratio 0.499; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.346–0.719; p = 0.0001). ORR was 65.9% in the abemaciclib arm and 36.1% in the placebo arm (p < 0.0001, measurable disease population). In cohort B, 104 patients were randomly assigned to the abemaciclib arm and 53 to the placebo arm. Abemaciclib significantly improved PFS versus placebo (median: 11.5 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.240–0.588; p < 0.0001). ORR was 50.0% in the abemaciclib arm and 10.5% in the placebo arm (p < 0.0001, measurable disease population). The most frequent grade ⩾3 adverse events in the abemaciclib arms were neutropenia, leukopenia, and anemia (both cohorts), and lymphocytopenia (cohort B).Conclusion:The addition of abemaciclib to ET demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and ORR, without new safety signals observed in this population.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02763566.

Validation of HER2 Amplification as a Predictive Biomarker for Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

HER2 amplification has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (anti-EGFRabs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of the study was to validate the predictive impact of HER2 amplification in mCRC. We analyzed patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC across two distinct cohorts. In cohort 1 (n = 98), HER2 amplification was tested in tumor tissue using dual in situ hybridization (HER2 amplification: HER2/CEP17 ratio, 2.0 or greater). Cohort 2 (n = 70) included 16 patients with HER2 amplification and 54 HER2 nonamplified controls identified by next-generation sequencing (HER2 amplification: four or more copies) who had received prior anti-EGFRabs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with anti-EGFRab therapy, which was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Median PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab-based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with HER2 amplification compared with HER2 nonamplified patients (2.8 v 8.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.05; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.9; P < .001). These findings were validated in cohort 2 (median PFS for HER2 amplified v nonamplified: 2.8 v 9.3 months, respectively; HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 4.5 to 25.1; P < .001). The median PFS on therapy without anti-EGFRabs was similar among HER2-amplified and nonamplified patients in both cohort 1 (9.7 v 11.1 months, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; P = .97) and cohort 2 (9.6 v 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; P = .66). In multivariable analyses, HER2 amplification emerged as a single independent predictor of poor PFS on anti-EGFRab therapy in both cohort 1 (HR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; P < .001) and cohort 2 (HR, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.3 to 23.9; P < .001). HER2 amplification in RAS/RAF wild-type mCRC seems to be a predictive biomarker for lack of efficacy of anti-EGFRab therapy. Screening patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC for HER2 amplification should be considered before anti-EGFRab treatment to guide therapy and to identify patients for early referral to clinical trials.

A Phase II, Multicenter Study of High Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Followed By Maintenance Therapy with Romidepsin for T-Cell Lymphoma

A Phase II, Multicenter Study of High Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Followed By Maintenance Therapy with Romidepsin for T-Cell Lymphoma

Diffusion-weighted MRI in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Response Marker

Background Treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer results in a relapse rate of 75%. Early markers of response would enable optimization of management and improved outcome in both primary and recurrent disease. Purpose To assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), derived from diffusion-weighted MRI, as an indicator of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter trial (from 2012-2016) recruited participants with stage III or IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (newly diagnosed, cohort one; relapsed, cohort two) scheduled for platinum-based chemotherapy, with interval debulking surgery in cohort one. Cohort one underwent two baseline MRI examinations separated by 0-7 days to assess ADC repeatability; an additional MRI was performed after three treatment cycles. Cohort two underwent imaging at baseline and after one and three treatment cycles. ADC changes in responders and nonresponders were compared (Wilcoxon rank sum tests). PFS and overall survival were assessed by using a multivariable Cox model. Results A total of 125 participants (median age, 63.3 years [interquartile range, 57.0-70.7 years]; 125 women; cohort one, n = 47; cohort two, n = 78) were included. Baseline ADC (range, 77-258 × 10-5mm2s-1) was repeatable (upper and lower 95% limits of agreement of 12 × 10-5mm2s-1 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6 × 10-5mm2s-1 to 18 × 10-5mm2s-1] and -15 × 10-5mm2s-1 [95% CI: -21 × 10-5mm2s-1 to -9 × 10-5mm2s-1]). ADC increased in 47% of cohort two after one treatment cycle, and in 58% and 53% of cohorts one and two, respectively, after three cycles. Percentage change from baseline differed between responders and nonresponders after three cycles (16.6% vs 3.9%; P = .02 [biochemical response definition]; 19.0% vs 6.2%; P = .04 [radiologic definition]). ADC increase after one cycle was associated with longer PFS in cohort two (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.98; P = .03). ADC change was not indicative of overall survival for either cohort. Conclusion After three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes are indicative of response. After one treatment cycle, increased ADC is indicative of improved progression-free survival in relapsed disease. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.