Progression-free Survival Benefit Research Articles

Trastuzumab Duocarmazine in Pretreated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Trial (TULIP).

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy is standard of care for HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, but most patients develop progressive disease with persistent HER2 expression. No definitive treatment guidance currently exists beyond second line. Trastuzumab duocarmazine (T-Duo) is a third-generation, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate that demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in phase I studies of heavily pretreated patients with HER2+/HER2-low breast cancer. In this open-label, randomized, phase III trial, T-Duo was compared with physician's choice (PC) in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic HER2+ breast cancer with progression during/after ≥2 HER2-targeted therapies or after trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. In total, 437 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to T-Duo (n = 291) or PC (n = 146). The median age was 56.0 years (range, 24-86); most patients (93.6%) had metastatic disease. The median time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to trial entry was 3.5 years; the median number of prior HER2-targeted therapies in metastatic setting was three. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.2) with T-Duo versus 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.5; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.84]; P = .002) with PC. PFS benefit was maintained across most predefined subgroups. The median overall survival (first analysis) was 20.4 (T-Duo) versus 16.3 months (PC; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.09]; P = .153). Objective response rate was 27.8% (T-Duo) versus 29.5% (PC); other efficacy end points-clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and reduction in target lesion measurement-tended to favor T-Duo. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 52.8% (T-Duo) versus 48.2% (PC). Treatment with T-Duo was manageable, but tolerability was affected by prevalent ocular toxicity, leading to a higher discontinuation rate in the T-Duo arm. T-Duo significantly reduced the risk of progression in patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer who have progressed during/after ≥2 HER2-targeted therapies or after T-DM1.

The efficacy of Veliparib in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of veliparib, a poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor, in combination with chemotherapy in treating bronchogenic carcinoma. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials comparing veliparib plus chemotherapy to standard chemotherapy in adult lung cancer patients, until July 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). This meta-analysis included six studies encompassing 2,136 patients. Veliparib has a slight OS improvement over placebo, HR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.83 to 1.0], p = 0.05. Veliparib offers more OS benefit in the subpopulation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), HR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81,0.99], p = 0.03 and HR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.79, 1.28], p = 0.97, respectively. There was no significant PFS benefit between the two groups, HR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.81-1.01], p = 0.08). Veliparib has a marginal inclination for overall survival improvement, more so in NSCLC, with an acceptable safety profile. Our results merit the pursuit of better-powered trials to support further the extent of veliparib's effectiveness in lung cancer patients. PROSPERO (CRD42023453705).

The repeated treatment of targeted therapy in the treatment of skin melanoma

Currently, patients with disseminated forms of skin melanoma have limited treatment options. The most effective treatments, according to research, are targeted drugs BRAF/MEK inhibitors when a mutation in exon 15 of the BRAF gene is detected in tumor biopsy tissue and immune synapse modulators, specifically anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 drugs. Both classes of drugs show a significant benefit in overall and progression-free survival, but convincing data on their effectiveness in second and subsequent lines of therapy are still lacking. Most often, with the progression of disseminated skin melanoma during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, a dual immunotherapy combination is used. In the event of further progression, due to the limited treatment options, clinical oncologists face questions about the possibility of returning to targeted therapy, changing tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs, or using the initial combination, and their impact on progression-free survival in choosing treatment strategies for such patients, as well as the potential use of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Assessing the reuse of tyrosine kinase inhibitor drugs is a highly relevant issue in clinical oncology.

FDA Approval Summary: Polatuzumab Vedotin in the First-Line Treatment of Select Large B-cell Lymphomas.

In April 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted regular approval to polatuzumab vedotin-piiq in combination with a rituximab product, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (pola+R-CHP) for adult patients who have previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified or high-grade B-cell lymphoma and who have an International Prognostic Index score of 2 or greater. Approval was based on POLARIX, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the superiority of substituting vincristine with polatuzumab vedotin in the rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen as first-line therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Efficacy was based on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in 879 patients who were randomized to receive pola+R-CHP or R-CHOP, followed by two cycles of rituximab alone. PFS was statistically significantly longer with pola+R-CHP with a HR of 0.73 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.95] and log-rank p-value of 0.0177 (two-sided α=0.05). There was no improvement demonstrated in the key secondary endpoints of CR rate at the end of therapy or overall survival (OS). Several issues raised uncertainty about the benefit-risk of polatuzumab vedotin in this curative-intent setting including the modest PFS benefit of pola+R-CHP and lack of OS benefit. The application was therefore presented at an Oncology Drug Advisory Committee. This article summarizes key aspects of the regulatory review, including perspectives on PFS and OS results and other endpoints.

Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs and RWSs.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWS). By scanning PubMed, Web of science, Embase, and other relevant clinical information public databases, nine RCTs and eight RWSs involving 5205 patients were included in the study. We directly compared the differences between chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, and determined the optimal treatment strategy through network meta-analysis (NMA). Compared to chemotherapy, the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly improves the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in SCLC patients. Regarding safety, both RCTs and RWSs indicated no significant difference in grade 3-4 adverse events between chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy. NMA showed serplulimab plus chemotherapy (Serp_Chemo) appears to provide the best OS, PFS, and ORR benefit, while nivolumab plus chemotherapy shows higher toxicity than other regimens. In subgroup analysis, for elderly patients (age ≥65) and non-elderly (age <65) patients, the most promising quality regimens for achieving better OS extension are atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (Atez_Chemo) and Serp_Chemo, respectively. For patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > upper limit of normal (ULN), there is no apparent OS benefit from immune therapy. In ES-SCLC treatment, adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to standard chemotherapy improves OS, PFS, and ORR, with Serp_Chemo shows the most promise. Atez_Chemo and Serp_Chemo provided better survival for elderly and non-elderly patients, respectively.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatments for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Network Meta-Analysis.

The Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) treatment strategies have transitioned from chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy to chemo-free regimens. Frequentist network meta-analysis allows for both direct and indirect comparisons between different treatments. Randomized controlled trials assessing first-line treatments were included. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD), objective response rate, and adverse events. Studies with comparable characteristics also underwent subgroup analysis, stratifying by age, comorbidities, IGHV status, and cytogenetic abnormalities. 30 eligible trials involved 12,818 patients and 30 treatments were included. Acalabrutinib demonstrated a PFS advantage over ibrutinib and obinutuzumab-venetoclax (OV) in patients over 65 years old or with unmutated IGHV. In younger patients with comorbidities, Acalabrutinib-Obinutuzumab (AO) had superior PFS compared to Ibrutinib-Obinutuzumab (IO), Ibrutinib-Venetoclax (IV), and OV. For older patients with comorbidities, Acalabrutinib and AO both outperformed OV without significant difference between them. MRD-guided IV surpassed OV in patients without comorbidities. IO exhibited extended PFS benefits compared to OV in patients with mutated IGHV or with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations. IV and IO have lower neutropenia rates than OV. IV have fewer infections than Acalabrutinib and AO. AO causes less diarrhea than IV but more headaches than IO and OV. OV has lower hypertension rates than IO. IV has fewer arthralgia than AO. For any grade secondary primary neoplasms, IV and OV is less than AO. Tailored chemo-free regimens can be selected based on age, comorbidities, IGHV status, and cytogenetic abnormalities to optimize treatment outcomes while considering different response spectra.

Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on hormone receptor status: a retrospective study

BackgroundDifferent hormone receptor (HR) expression patterns have significant biological and therapeutic implications in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, the distinction between HR-positive /HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) and HR-negative/HER2-positive (HR-/HER2+) subtypes remains unclear.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed 828 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from 2012 to 2022. Baseline characteristics were compared by chi-square test. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsIn total, 56.3% (n = 466) had HR-positive and 43.7% (n = 362) had HR-negative disease. Comparatively, HR+/HER2 + breast cancers presented favorable clinicopathological features. At a median follow-up of 49 months, 199 disease-free survival (DFS) events and 99 deaths were observed. HR+/HER2 + patients had significantly better survival outcomes than HR-/HER2 + patients. HR-positive status was an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS) [P = 0.032; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39–0.96] and DFS (P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46–0.81). HR+/HER2 + patients were significantly less sensitive to neoadjuvant therapy than HR-/HER2 + patients. In the first-line treatment for HR+/HER2 + advanced breast cancer, receiving endocrine therapy significantly improved advanced-OS (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.59) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25–0.58) compared with not receiving endocrine therapy. Moreover, maintenance endocrine therapy after HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy is associated with significant advanced-OS and PFS benefits compared with no maintenance endocrine therapy (advanced-OS: P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.03–0.12; PFS: P < 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21–0.57).ConclusionsThis study reveals the high heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer related to HR status in clinicopathological features, metastasis patterns, and outcomes. Large randomized controlled trials are warranted to optimize treatment strategies for the HER2-positive breast cancer population.

A new proposal of simplified classification of non-small cell lung cancer oligometastases for easy applicability through systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation

IntroductionOligometastasis (OM) exhibits wide range of prognosis, which necessitates appropriate classification for optimal therapeutic decision-making. Complementing the ESTRO-EORTC classification which lacked prognostic differentiation and was rather complex, we propose a new and simpler classification based on systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation. MethodThe databases were searched up to April 2024. Inclusion criteria were (1) ≥ 10 Non-small cell lung cancer OM patients, (2) local ablative treatment (LAT) versus control (systemic/supportive treatment), (3) reporting progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), respectively. A simpler classification was proposed through systematic reviews evaluating outcomes based on OM characteristics. According to this new classification, the LAT benefit and pooled 2-year OS and 1-year PFS percentiles were validated through meta-analysis. ResultsIn overall meta-analysis, LAT was correlated with enhanced 1-year PFS (odds ratio (OR):3.487, p < 0.001) and 2-year OS (OR:2.984, p < 0.001), respectively. According to simplified classification, LAT benefit of 1-year PFS was differentiated with ORs of 5.631 (p < 0.001), 3.484 (p < 0.001), and 1.702 (p = 0.067) for Synchronous (Syn), OPS (Oligopersistence), and OPR (Oligoprogression/recurrence) subgroups, respectively. Inter-subgroup comparisons showed significant differences as well. For 2-year OS, ORs of LAT benefit were 3.366 (p < 0.001), 3.355 (p < 0.001), and 1.821 (p = 0.127) in Syn, OPS, and OPR subgroups, respectively; LAT benefit was significant in Syn and OPS, but not significant in OPR. In pooled percentile comparison, 1-year pooled PFS was significantly lower in the OPR group than others, both in the LAT and control arms. ConclusionBased on a systematic literature analysis and meta-analysis validation, we developed a simpler three-step OM classification: Syn, OPS, and OPR. We would propose this new classification that is simpler and more applicable to clinical decisions than the currently available classification.

Sustained benefit of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in patients with R/R CLL/SLL: final comparative analysis of ALPINE

AbstractThe ALPINE trial established the superiority of zanubrutinib over ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; here, we present data from the final comparative analysis with extended follow-up. Overall, 652 patients received zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325). At an overall median follow-up of 42.5 months, progression-free survival benefit with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib was sustained (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.84), including in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.78) and across multiple sensitivity analyses. Overall response rate remained higher with zanubrutinib compared with ibrutinib (85.6% vs 75.4%); responses deepened over time with complete response/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery rates of 11.6% (zanubrutinib) and 7.7% (ibrutinib). Although median overall survival has not been reached in either treatment group, fewer zanubrutinib patients have died than ibrutinib patients (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.55-1.06]). With median exposure time of 41.2 and 37.8 months in zanubrutinib and ibrutinib arms, respectively, the most common nonhematologic adverse events included COVID-19–related infection (46.0% vs 33.3%), diarrhea (18.8% vs 25.6%), upper respiratory tract infection (29.3% vs 19.8%), and hypertension (27.2% vs 25.3%). Cardiac events were lower with zanubrutinib (25.9% vs 35.5%) despite similar rates of hypertension. Incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was lower with zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (7.1% vs 17.0%); no cardiac deaths were reported with zanubrutinib vs 6 cardiac deaths with ibrutinib. This analysis, at 42.5 months median follow-up, demonstrates that zanubrutinib remains more efficacious than ibrutinib with an improved overall safety/tolerability profile. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03734016.

Fulvestrant en la práctica clínica: análisis de efectividad en pacientes uruguayas con cáncer de mama HR+/HER2.

Fulvestrant demonstrated benefits in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancer, who are hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative. The characteristics, evolution, and survival of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with fulvestrant were evaluated according to the national treatment coverage protocols of the National Resources Fund, with the aim of understanding the efficacy of fulvestrant in patients treated in usual clinical practice and comparing our results with those from pivotal studies. A database from the National Resources Fund covering the period from 2009 to 2022 was used. Survival curves were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were analyzed using the Log-Rank test. A total of 1085 patients with an average age of 63,66 years were included. Following a follow-up of 14 months, the median overall survival was 16 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6 months. The presence of liver and bone metastases was associated with a shorter overall survival. Patients from the public sector and those with a better performance status experienced longer overall survival. Our findings provide a valuable perspective for treatment management in a context of limited resources. Overall survival and progression-free survival were somewhat lower than those reported in pivotal clinical trials. The presence of liver and bone metastases was associated with worse prognosis and survival; additionally, patients with worse performance status had shorter overall survival. These findings underscore the need for personalized therapies, opening new lines of future research.

Doxycycline Plus Bortezomib-Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Light-Chain Amyloidosis in the Frontline Setting: Experience from the Amyloidosis Program of Calgary.

Background: Pre-clinical and retrospective data suggest that doxycycline added to treatment regimens has benefit in AL amyloidosis. However, a recent multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial in AL amyloidosis patients treated with CyBorD did not demonstrate a progression-free survival (PFS) or cardiac PFS benefit with added doxycycline. Objective: The main objective of this study was to explore the role of doxycycline combined with bortezomib-containing regimens (BCRs) for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients with cardiac involvement and to compare them with a cohort of concurrent patients treated with BCR only. Material and Methods: AL amyloidosis patients, newly diagnosed between January 2012 and March 2022, who were treated with BCR at the Amyloidosis Program of Calgary (APC) were evaluated. Results: Sixty-four concurrent patients were identified. Thirty-nine patients received doxycycline in addition to BCR (BCR-D) for a median of 8 months. The overall response rate was similar among the groups. No significant differences in VGPR/CR, dFLC at 1 month, time to first response, time to best response, or organ responses were noted between the BCR alone and BCR-D groups. Summary and Conclusions: Our retrospective study demonstrated that doxycycline combined with BCR failed to prolong OS, PFS, or cardiac responses compared with BCR alone in patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer: Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01.

The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2-directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n = 365) or ICC (n = 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC. Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.

Antithetical impacts of deleterious LRP1B mutations in non-squamous and squamous NSCLCs on predicting benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitor alone or with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone: retrospective analyses of the POPLAR/OAK and CHOICE-01 trials.

In non-small cell lung cancers, the non-squamous and squamous subtypes (nsqNSCLC and sqNSCLC) exhibit disparities in pathophysiology, tumor immunology, and potential genomic correlates affecting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments. In our in-house training cohort (n=85), the presence of the LRP1B deleterious mutation (LRP1B-del) was associated with longer and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on ICIs alone in nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs, respectively (Pinteraction=0.008). These results were validated using a larger public ICI cohort (n=208, Pinteraction<0.001). Multiplex immunofluorescence staining revealed an association between LRP1B-del and increased and decreased numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in nsqNSCLCs (P=0.040) and sqNSCLCs (P=0.014), respectively. In the POPLAR/OAK cohort, nsqNSCLCs with LRP1B-del demonstrated improved PFS benefits from atezolizumab over docetaxel (hazard ratio (HR) =0.70, P=0.046), whereas this benefit was negligible in those without LRP1B-del (HR=1.05, P=0.64). Conversely, sqNSCLCs without LRP1B-del benefited more from atezolizumab (HR=0.60, P=0.002) than those with LRP1B-del (HR=1.30, P=0.31). Consistent results were observed in the in-house CHOICE-01 cohort, in which nsqNSCLCs with LRP1B-del and sqNSCLCs without LRP1B-del benefited more from toripalimab plus chemotherapy than from chemotherapy alone (Pinteraction=0.008). This multi-cohort study delineates the antithetical impacts of LRP1B-del in nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs on predicting the benefits from ICI alone or with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Our findings highlight the distinct clinical utility of LRP1B-del in guiding treatment choices for nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed analysis based on pathological subtypes when investigating biomarkers for cancer therapeutics.

Daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone alone in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS Study.

The superiority and tolerability of daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) was previously described in the global phase 3 ALCYONE study. The primary analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS study further demonstrated the superiority and tolerability of D-VMP (n = 144) versus VMP (n = 71) in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM. The current analysis describes the final efficacy and safety outcomes for D-VMP versus VMP in OCTANS, with a follow-up of > 3 years. D-VMP demonstrated a benefit versus VMP with regard to the rate of very good partial response or better (80.1% vs. 47.3%), median progression-free survival (38.7 vs. 19.2 months), median time to next treatment (46.8 vs. 20.6 months), rate of complete response or better (46.6% vs. 18.9%), median duration of response (41.3 vs. 18.5 months), achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (40.4% vs. 10.8%), and sustained MRD negativity for ≥ 12 months (24.7% vs. 1.4%) and ≥ 18 months (15.1% vs. 1.4%). Median progression-free survival was longer among patients who achieved MRD negativity and sustained MRD negativity. The progression-free survival benefit observed with D-VMP was preserved across most clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetics. No new safety concerns were identified with extended follow-up. This final analysis of OCTANS continues to demonstrate a clinical benefit for D-VMP versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM, consistent with the global ALCYONE study, and supports the use of daratumumab combinations in this population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03217812 submitted July 13, 2017.

Efficacy of CARVYKTI in CARTITUDE-4 versus other conventional treatment regimens for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Aim: The phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) demonstrated superiority of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) over daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) and pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have received one to three prior line(s) of therapy (LOT[s]) including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and are refractory to lenalidomide. These analyses estimate the relative efficacy between cilta-cel and other common treatment regimens, for which no direct comparative evidence is available. Materials & methods: Patient data were available from the CARTITUDE-4, CASTOR, CANDOR and APOLLO RCTs. Imbalances between cohorts on key patient characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Relative efficacies were estimated with response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better rate (≥VGPR) and complete response or better rate (≥CR), and with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analyses using different analytical methods and additional covariates were explored. Results: Key characteristics were well balanced across cohorts after IPTW. Cilta-cel showed statistically significant benefit in PFS (HRs: 0.11-0.51), ≥VGPR (RRs: 1.51-5.13) and ≥CR (RRs: 2.90-35.24) versus all comparators, and statistically significant improvements in ORR over most comparator regimens (RRs: 1.22-1.90). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Cilta-cel demonstrated benefit over other common treatment regimens, highlighting its potential to become a new standard of care option for lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients with one to three prior LOT(s). These comparisons help to demonstrate the improved efficacy of cilta-cel in countries where the standard of care may differ from DPd/PVd.

Lenalidomide, ixazomib, or daratumumab maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma

AbstractLenalidomide, ixazomib, and daratumumab have been proposed as maintenance therapies for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM; NDMM). There are, however, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing them. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs comparing these agents against placebo in NDMM. A Bayesian NMA model was used to assess the relative effects of competing treatments on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 9 studies including 4115 patients with transplant-eligible MM (TEMM) and 1689 patients with non–transplant-eligible MM (NTEMM). Lenalidomide and daratumumab but not ixazomib were associated with improved PFS compared with placebo in patients with TEMM (lenalidomide [hazard ratio (HR), 0.46; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.36-0.56]; daratumumab [HR, 0.49; 95% Crl, 0.32-0.76]; and ixazomib [HR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.46-1.12]) and those with NTEMM (lenalidomide [HR, 0.46; 95% CrI, 0.29-0.75] and ixazomib [HR, 0.69; 95% CrI, 0.43-1.18]). The PFS benefit for daratumumab was present regardless of whether daratumumab-based induction therapy was received. None of the agents showed an OS benefit, and PFS benefits were not seen in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Lenalidomide was associated with second malignancies, ixazomib with thrombocytopenia, and daratumumab with pneumonia. We propose that lenalidomide remains the maintenance therapy of choice for NDMM.

Efficacy of ALK inhibitors in Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

A previous network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phase III INSPIRE study of iruplinalkib was published recently. The present study aimed to add the results related to iruplinalkib to the NMA. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google, and Baidu. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), or disease control rate (DCR) results of Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were eligible for inclusion in the NMA. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Bayesian fixed-effect models were used for the direct and indirect pairwise comparisons. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024555299). Eight studies, involving 1,477 Asian patients and seven treatments (crizotinib, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, envonalkib, iruplinalkib, and lorlatinib), were included in the NMA. In terms of the overall risks of bias, all of the studies had "some concerns". All the next-generation ALK inhibitors were statistically superior to crizotinib in terms of PFS. Iruplinalkib had the best surface under the cumulative ranking curve (74.0%), followed by brigatinib (69.1%) and ensartinib (63.7%). Most of the pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant differences in the ORR and DCR. In terms of both the ORR and DCR, alectinib ranked first, followed by lorlatinib. Next-generation ALK inhibitors had better efficacy than crizotinib in the treatment of Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naïve advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. Iruplinalkib may have more favorable PFS benefit than other ALK inhibitors for Asians.

Low-dose abiraterone plus Olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC patients without BRCA1/2 mutations: a multicenter retrospective pilot study

Although overall survival data are still premature, the PROpel study found radiological progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of abiraterone and olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, for patients who have not been genetically tested or lack BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm), this combination therapy has been questioned as a first-line conventional treatment for mCRPC, mainly due to significant health economics and side effects. In our retrospective study, we found that treatment with low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a late-line treatment for mCRPC could lead to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and symptom PFS in selective cases even without BRCAm. The median PSA–PFS was 8 months (IQR: 6.5–11.5), with a median follow-up duration of 39.0 months (IQR: 27.5–64.5). Gene tests were conducted in all patients, identifying non-BRCA mutations through ctDNA testing (24%), tumor tissue testing (12%), or both (64%). Adverse events occurred in 72% of patients, with 16% experiencing Grade ≥ 3 events. Common adverse events included anemia (64%), decreased appetite (48%), and fatigue (25%). Our findings support low-dose abiraterone plus olaparib as a potential option for mCRPC patients without BRCAm, offering manageable safety and efficacy profiles.

Unraveling the role of local ablative therapies for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma – A retrospective multicenter study of the Bavarian university hospitals

BackgroundLocal ablative therapies (LAT) are increasingly used in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), yet evidence-based standards are lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of LAT on survival of metastatic STS patients and to identify prognostic factors. MethodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, 246 STS patients with metastatic disease who underwent LAT on tumor board recommendation between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. A mixed effects model was applied to evaluate multiple survival events per patient. ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) after first metastasis was 5.4 years with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 93.7, 81.7, and 53.1 %, respectively. A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of liver metastases were positively correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) after LAT (HR = 0.61, p = 0.00032 and HR = 0.52, p = 0.0081, respectively). A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of metastatic lesions in a single organ site other than lung and liver were positive prognostic factors for OS after first LAT (HR = 0.50, p = 0.028 and HR = 0.40, p = 0.026, respectively) while rare histotypes and LAT other than surgery and radiotherapy were negatively associated with OS after first LAT (HR = 2.56, p = 0.020 and HR = 3.87, p = 0.025). Additional systemic therapy was independently associated with a PFS benefit in patients ≤60 years with ≥4 metastatic lesions (for max. diameter of treated lesions ≤2 cm: HR = 0.32, p = 0.02 and >2 cm: HR = 0.20, p = 0.0011, respectively). ConclusionThis multicenter study conducted at six German university hospitals underlines the value of LAT in metastatic STS. The exceptionally high survival rates are likely to be associated with patient selection and treatment in specialized sarcoma centers.

SGLT2 inhibition improves PI3Kα inhibitor–induced hyperglycemia: findings from preclinical animal models and from patients in the BYLieve and SOLAR-1 trials

PurposeAlpelisib plus fulvestrant demonstrated a significant progression-free survival benefit versus fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ /HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) (SOLAR-1). Hyperglycemia, an on-target adverse effect of PI3Kα inhibition, can lead to dose modifications, potentially impacting alpelisib efficacy. We report data from preclinical models and two clinical trials (SOLAR-1 and BYLieve) on Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use to improve PI3Kα inhibitor–associated hyperglycemia.MethodsHealthy Brown Norway (BN), mild diabetic Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF), and Rat1-myr-p110α/HBRX3077 tumor–bearing nude rats treated with alpelisib were analyzed for glucose and insulin control with metformin and dapagliflozin (SGLT2i) and alpelisib efficacy. Hyperglycemia adverse events (AEs) were compared between patients receiving SGLT2i with alpelisib (n = 19) and a propensity score–matched cohort not receiving SGLT2i (n = 74) in both trials.ResultsDapagliflozin and metformin in BN and ZDF rats treated with alpelisib normalized blood glucose and reduced insulin levels. No signs of ketosis or drug-drug interaction were observed when metformin and dapagliflozin was administered with alpelisib. Alpelisib antitumor efficacy was maintained when used with dapagliflozin in tumor-bearing rats. Compared with a matched set of patients without SGLT2i, patients receiving SGLT2i had 4.9 and 6.4 times lower rates of grade ≥ 3 hyperglycemia AEs and hyperglycemia AEs resulting in alpelisib dose adjustments, interruptions, or withdrawals, respectively, and a relative reduction in risk of experiencing these AEs (70.6% and 35.7%).ConclusionThese data suggest adding an SGLT2i can effectively manage hyperglycemia, resulting in fewer alpelisib dose modifications and discontinuations in patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+ /HER2− ABC (SOLAR-1: NCT02437318; BYLieve: NCT03056755).