Progression-free Survival Advantage Research Articles

Alliance A061202: ixazomib, pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma in first relapse

Optimal therapy for the growing number of patients with lenalidomide (LEN)-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in first relapse remains poorly defined. We therefore undertook a randomized phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combining the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (IXA) with pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) for this patient population. The overall response rate (ORR) for POM-DEX was 43.6% and 63.2% for IXA-POM-DEX. Depth of response, as measured by attainment of a very good partial response or better favored the triplet over the doublet, 28.9% vs 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.0063). A pre-planned interim analysis after 75% of the progression events had occurred demonstrated a progression-free survival (PFS) advantage favoring IXA-POM-DEX that crossed the predefined boundary of superiority, leading to release of the study results. With additional follow-up, the median PFS for POM-DEX was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8 - 13.6 months) vs 20.3 months for IXA-POM-DEX (95% CI 7.7 - 26.0 months, hazard ratio 0.437 [upper 90% bound = 0.657]). ORR and median PFS for the 26 of 30 eligible patients who crossed over from the doublet to the triplet at progression was 23.1% and 5.6 months, respectively. Overall survival was similar between the two groups. More hematologic toxicities were seen with the triplet, but non-hematologic adverse events were similar between the two arms. Our data support further testing of this all-oral triplet vs current standard triplet therapy in the context of phase III studies for patients with LEN-refractory disease in first relapse. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02004275.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of frontline immunotherapy combinations in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a network meta-analysis highlighting the value of PD-L1 expression positivity scores.

The systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) consolidate all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to initial immunotherapy treatments for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our goal is to thoroughly assess the effectiveness and safety of various immunotherapy methods, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with advanced ESCC positive for PD-L1. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, covering all records from their inception until January 22, 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted patients with advanced ESCC undergoing first-line immunotherapy or chemotherapy, limiting the study selection to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively. The study upholds the values of openness, originality, and dependability, as evidenced by its enrollment in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024504992). Our analysis encompasses 7 RCTs, totaling 4688 patients, and evaluates 8 distinct immunotherapy combinations. In advanced ESCC patients irrespective of PD-L1 expression, both sintilimab-chemotherapy and toripalimab-chemotherapy regimens demonstrated comparable OS benefits (HR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.64-1.33). The most pronounced PFS advantages were seen with sintilimab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy as compared to standard chemotherapy (HR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.46-0.58). Notably, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.59-1.16) and nivolumab-ipilimumab (HR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.17) demonstrated significant safety profiles over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis based on PD-L1 expression revealed nivolumab-chemotherapy to yield the highest OS benefit (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.79) in ESCC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Furthermore, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.67) exhibited superior PFS benefits. Among patients with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy (HR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.35-0.78) emerged as the most efficacious in improving OS, while serplulimab-chemotherapy (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.34-0.68) was associated with the longest PFS benefit. The integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy appears to significantly enhance survival outcomes in patients with advanced ESCC compared to chemotherapy alone. Sintilimab-chemotherapy is potentially the optimal regimen for patients without PD-L1 expression. In contrast, nivolumab-chemotherapy and camrelizumab-chemotherapy are likely to offer the best OS and PFS benefits, respectively, in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Among those with PD-L1 expression ≥10%, camrelizumab-chemotherapy is projected to provide the greatest OS advantage, whereas serplulimab-chemotherapy is anticipated to offer the most prolonged PFS benefit. Since most of the patients in this study originated from Asia, the above findings are more applicable to the Asian population. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024504992.

Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for treating patients with advanced RET+ non-small cell lung cancer.

8647 Background: RET inhibitors (RETi) are currently the preferred first-line treatment in advanced RET fusion-positive (RET+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite impressive efficacy of RETi, resistance is inevitable, and the optimal therapy beyond RETi remains unclear. Immunotherapy has shown limited efficacy in these patients. This study aims to investigate the impact of adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy regimens on treatment outcomes. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with RET+ advanced NSCLC who received either a platinum-doublet chemotherapy (D) (+/-anti-PD-L(1) agents (ICB)) or a non-platinum monotherapy (M), with or without bevacizumab (Bev). Non-platinum agents were limited to pemetrexed, paclitaxel, or docetaxel. Only the first administration of the regimen was considered. Objective responses (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from the start of treatment were compared between patients receiving and not receiving Bev. Results: Of 185 patients, 20 received Bev in doublet chemotherapy (D+Bev, none with ICB) and 165 did not (D, 68 with ICB). Additionally, 40 underwent single-agent chemotherapy, with 8 on Bev (M+Bev) and 32 without (M). D+Bev patients were younger (median age: 54 vs. 61 years, p=0.026), less often treated with RETi (55% vs. 79%, p=0.023), with no other demographic or disease-related group differences. Both D+Bev and D had a median of 1 treatment line [IQR 1-1]. M+Bev and M had a median of 3 and 2 treatment lines, respectively (p=0.3), and numerically more M+Bev patients had brain metastases (25% vs. 13%, p=0.6). In the D+Bev vs D (+/-ICB) comparison, the OR was 55% vs 47% (p=0.7), and the median PFS was significantly longer in the D+Bev group (17 months vs. 8.8 months, p=0.018). When comparing D+Bev with D+ICB, D+Bev still showed a significant advantage in median PFS (17 months vs 9.7 months, p=0.05). The median OS was 51.4 months for D+Bev compared to 38.7 months for D (p=0.89). Multivariate analysis revealed that Bev use was independently associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.4, p=0.01), while ECOG>1 (HR 4.3, p<0.0001) and male sex (HR 1.7, p=0.01) were associated with shorter PFS. In the M+Bev versus M group, the OR was 13% versus 25% (p=0.6), median PFS was 2.4 months versus 4.1 months (p=0.06), and median OS was 12.1 months versus 39 months (p=0.06). Conclusions: Bevacizumab with platinum-doublet chemotherapy seems to outperform platinum-doublet with or without ICB in progression-free survival. Prospective research is needed to evaluate the extent of bevacizumab's benefit for RET+ NSCLC.

The Benefits and Risks of Receiving Investigational Solid Tumor Drugs in Randomized Trials : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Many patients participate in cancer trials to access new therapies. The extent to which new treatments produce clinical benefit for trial participants is unclear. To estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) advantage of assignment to experimental groups in randomized trials for 6 solid tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for trials of investigational drugs with results posted between 2017 and 2021. Investigational drugs were defined as those not yet having full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the study indication. Trials were included if they were randomized and tested drugs or biologics. Data extraction was completed by 2 independent reviewers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The sample included 128 trials comprising 141 comparisons of a new drug and a comparator. These comparisons included 47 050 patients. The pooled hazard ratio for PFS was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.85), indicating statistically significant benefit for patients in experimental groups. This corresponded to a median PFS advantage of 1.25 months (CI, 0.80 to 1.68 months). The pooled hazard ratio for OS was 0.92 (CI, 0.88 to 0.95), corresponding to a survival gain of 1.18 months (CI, 0.72 to 1.71 months). The absolute risk for a serious adverse event for comparator group patients was 29.56% (CI, 26.64% to 32.65%), with an increase in risk of 7.40% (CI, 5.66% to 9.14%) for patients in experimental groups. Trials in this sample were heterogeneous. Comparator group interventions were assumed to reflect standard of care. Assignment to experimental groups produces statistically significant survival gains. However, the absolute survival gain is small, and toxicity is statistically significantly greater. The findings of this review provide reassuring evidence that patients are not meaningfully disadvantaged by assignment to comparator groups. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

ATF3 characterizes aggressive drug-tolerant persister cells in HGSOC

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represents the most common and lethal subtype of ovarian cancer. Despite initial response to platinum-based standard therapy, patients commonly suffer from relapse that likely originates from drug-tolerant persister (DTP) cells. We generated isogenic clones of treatment-naïve and cisplatin-tolerant persister HGSOC cells. In addition, single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded cells was performed in a xenograft model with HGSOC cell lines after platinum-based therapy. Published single-cell RNA-sequencing data from neo-adjuvant and non-treated HGSOC patients and patient data from TCGA were analyzed. DTP-derived cells exhibited morphological alterations and upregulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers. An aggressive subpopulation of DTP-derived cells showed high expression of the stress marker ATF3. Knockdown of ATF3 enhanced the sensitivity of aggressive DTP-derived cells to cisplatin-induced cell death, implying a role for ATF3 stress response in promoting a drug tolerant persister cell state. Furthermore, single cell lineage tracing to detect transcriptional changes in a HGSOC cell line-derived xenograft relapse model showed that cells derived from relapsed solid tumors express increased levels of EMT and multiple endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress markers, including ATF3. Single cell RNA sequencing of epithelial cells from four HGSOC patients also identified a small cell population resembling DTP cells in all samples. Moreover, analysis of TCGA data from 259 HGSOC patients revealed a significant progression-free survival advantage for patients with low expression of the ATF3-associated partial EMT genes. These findings suggest that increased ATF3 expression together with partial EMT promote the development of aggressive DTP, and thereby relapse in HGSOC patients.

Clinical difference on the variants and co-mutation in a Chinese cohort with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Despite the generally favourable prognoses observed in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there remains significant variability in clinical outcomes. The objective of this study is to enhance patient stratification by examining both the specific sites of gene fusion and the presence of co-occurring mutations. We collected retrospective clinical and pathological data on ALK-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. ALK fusion variants and concomitant mutations were identified through next-generation sequencing technology. We then assessed treatment efficacy via tumor response and survival metrics. This study included a total of 59 patients, with 49 harboring echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusions and 10 presenting with rare fusions. The median follow-up period was 33 months. Clinical outcomes between non-EML4-ALK and EML4-ALK patients were comparable. Among the EML4-ALK cohort, patients with longer variants (v1, v2, v8) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 34 months vs. 11 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.28; P = 0.05) compared to those with shorter variants (v3, v5). Furthermore, patients treated with second-generation ALK inhibitors (ALKi) displayed a progression-free survival advantage (median PFS: not reached [NR] vs. 9 months; HR: 5.37; P = 0.013). Baseline TP53 co-mutation were linked with a substantially shorter OS (median OS,37 months vs. NR; HR 2.74; P = 0.047). In ALK+ NSCLC, longer EML4-ALK variants correlate with improved prognosis and enhanced response to second-generation ALKi, while TP53 co-mutations indicate a negative prognosis.

Real-world evidence of efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy as initial treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combination therapies including a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy or a PD-1 inhibitor, CTLA-4 inhibitor, and chemotherapy are standard first-line options. However, data directly comparing these regimens are lacking. This study compared the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (CP) against nivolumab plus ipilimumab and chemotherapy (CNI) in a real-world setting. In this multicenter retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of CP and CNI as first-line therapies in 182 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the response rate (RR) and safety profiles. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized for data analysis, adjusting for confounding factors such as age, gender, and PD-L1 expression. In this study, 160 patients received CP, while 22 received CNI. The CP group was associated with significantly better PFS than the CNI group (median 11.7 vs. 6.6 months, HR 0.56, p = 0.03). This PFS advantage persisted after propensity score matching to adjust for imbalances. No significant OS differences were observed. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred comparably, but immune-related adverse events were numerically more frequent in the CNI group. In real-world practice, CP demonstrated superior PFS compared with CNI. These findings can inform treatment selection in advanced NSCLC.

Anti-angiogenic therapy or immunotherapy? A real-world study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR/HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations.

For patients with EGFR/HER2 exon20 insertions, platinum-containing double-drug chemotherapy is still the standard treatment method. First-generation TKIs have almost no therapeutic activity against EGFR exon 20 insertions. The efficacy of second-and third-generation TKIs is still controversial. Immunotherapy research is scarce, and there is an urgent need for more evidence and new treatment options for this group of patients. We reviewed patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR/HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations treated in Shanghai Chest Hospital and Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from 2015 to 2022 and assessed the efficacy of receiving chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy, including objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 126 patients included in the study, 51 patients had EGFR20ins mutations and 7 5 patients had HER2-20ins mutations. In the first-line treatment, bevacizumab + chemotherapy (Beva+Chemo), ICI+chemotherapy (ICI+Chemo), compared with chemotherapy alone (Chemo), ORR: 40% vs 33.3% vs 15% (p=0.0168); DCR: 84% vs 80.9% vs 67.5% (p=0.1817); median PFS: 8.3 vs 7.0 vs 4.6 months (p=0.0032), ICI+Chemo has a trend of benefiting on OS. Stratified analysis showed that compared with chemotherapy, ICI+Chemo was more effective for EGFR20ins mutation with median PFS: 10.3 vs. 6.3m (P=0.013); Beva+Chemo was more effective for HER2-20ins mutation, with a median PFS: 6.6 vs. 4.3m (p=0.030). In the second-line treatment of EGFR20ins mutation, bevacizumab + chemotherapy has a significant advantage in PFS compared with targeted therapy, median PFS:10.8 vs 4.0 months (P=0.016). For patients with EGFR20ins mutation, compared to chemotherapy, ICI+Chemo prolongs PFS, and after chemotherapy progression, bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy seems better than Furmonertinib-based targeted therapy on PFS. For HER2-20ins mutation, Beva+Chemo may be a better choice.

PD-L1 mRNA derived from tumor-educated platelets as a potential immunotherapy biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer.

To date, the role of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) messenger RNA (mRNA) derived from tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) has not been well investigated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A few reports have examined whether mRNA in TEPs can predict the clinical responses of patients with advanced NSCLC following immunotherapy. This study aimed to identify novel biomarkers to improve the clinical benefits and outcomes of NSCLC patients. Advanced NSCLC patients receiving a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, or immunotherapy alone as a first- or second-line treatment at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were enrolled in this study. All the patients had wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase. The patients were enrolled in clinical trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and camrelizumab. Tumoral PD-L1 expression was tested by immunohistochemistry (PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in archived tissue samples, when available, to calculate the tumor proportion scores (TPSs). RNA and exosomal RNA of blood were isolated before immunotherapy using the Yunying RNA extraction kit (Yunying Medicine, Shanghai, China). The concentration and quality of the RNA was determined using a Qubit fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Finally, we analyzed the predictive value of TEP-derived PD-L1 mRNA expression and association with the level of the tumoral PD-L1 expression. In total, 72 patients were enrolled in this study. Most of the patients were male (n=54, 75.0%), had adenocarcinoma (n=49, 68.1%). We found there was no significant correlation between the TEP-derived mRNA of PD-L1 and tumoral PD-L1 expression based on the results of the Pearson Correlation test (r=-0.19, P=0.233). Based on the median of PD-L1 mRNA, 72 patients were divided into a high PD-L1 group and a low PD-L1 group. We found that 19 patients (44.4%) responded to immunotherapy [partial response or progression-free survival (PFS) >6 months] in the high PD-L1 group, but only five patients (13.9%) responded to immunotherapy in the low PD-L1 group (P<0.01). The median PFS of the low PD-L1 group was lower than that of the high PD-L1 group (2.8 vs. 8.3 months, P<0.001). For the patients who were treated with immunotherapy alone (n=64), a similar PFS advantage was observed in the high PD-L1 group (2.8 vs. 8.0 months, P=0.002). This article presented the first data on TEP-derived PD-L1 mRNA in advanced NSCLC patients following immunotherapy and showed the potential advantage of using it as the surrogate biomarker for predicting the PFS and overall survival of patients following immunotherapy.

Intra-arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for the Treatment of Hepatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases: Hope or Hype?

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) confers significant progression-free survival advantage for patients with small bowel grade 1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NET). PRRT may also be clinically beneficial for patients with NET of pancreatic, bronchial, and other sites of origin; patients with paragangliomas; as well as for patients with well-differentiated grade 3 NET. Direct intra-arterial (IA) administration of PRRT into the hepatic artery for patients with NET liver metastases may result in higher radiopharmaceutical dose and longer dwell time in the liver tumors while relatively sparing non-tumor liver tissue and other organs such as the kidneys and bone marrow when compared with intravenous (IV) administration. This review summarizes currently available data on IA and IV PRRT dose distribution, reports safety and efficacy of IA PRRT, and proposes future research questions.

Human papillomavirus infection affects treatment outcomes and the immune microenvironment in patients with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor-based combination therapy.

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancy. Immunotherapy is emerging as a potential treatment for advanced PSCC. In this study, the authors analyzed the association of HPV status with outcomes and the immune microenvironment in patients with advanced PSCC undergoing programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitor-based combination therapy (PCT). HPV status was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction in 87 patients with advanced PSCC treated with PCT. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the HPV+ and HPV- groups were compared. Additionally, bulk RNA sequencing was performed to investigate the potential impact of HPV on the immune microenvironment in advanced PSCC. Among patients receiving first-line PCT, ORR (91.7% vs. 64.6%, p=.014) and DCR (100.0% vs. 79.2%, p=.025) in the HPV+group were higher compared to the HPV- group. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the HPV+group exhibited superior PFS (p=.005) and OS (p=.004) for patients in the first-line setting. However, these advantages of HPV infection were not observed in multi-line PCT (p>.050). HPV status remained an independent prognostic factor for predicting better ORR (p=.024), PFS (p=.002), and OS (p=.020) in the multivariate analyses. Landmark analyses showed that the HPV-induced superiority of PFS occurred at an early stage (within 3months) and OS occurred at a relatively late stage (within 9months). Bioinformatic analyses identified potential immune-activated genes (GLDC, CYP4F12, etc.) and pathways (RAGE, PI3K/AKT, etc.), antitumor immune cell subtypes, and lower tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion scores in HPV+tissues. HPV infection may confer treatment efficacy and survival benefits in patients with advanced PSCC receiving first-line PCT because of the possible stimulation of the antitumor immune microenvironment. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection may induce better objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) patients receiving first-line programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor-based combination therapy (PCT) instead of multi-line PCT. HPV infection-induced PFS advantage occurs at an early stage (within 3months) whereas OS superiority occurs at a relatively late stage (within 9months). Antitumor immune microenvironment could be stimulated by HPV infection in advanced PSCC tissues.

Third-line Treatment for Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an invasive histologic subtype with a poor prognosis and rapid progression. Currently, there is no standard therapy for the third-line treatment of mTNBC. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis to compare regimens and determine treatment outcomes. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Bases, and the minutes of major conferences. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate were analyzed through network meta-analysis using the R software (R Core Team). The efficacy of the treatment regimens was compared using hazard ratios, odds ratios, and 95% CIs. We evaluated 15 randomized controlled trials involving 6,010 patients. Compared with the physician's choice treatment, sacituzumab govitecan showed significant advantages in progression-free survival and overall survival, with hazard ratio values of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.32-0.52) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.60). In terms of objective response rate, sacituzumab govitecan is the best-performing therapy (odds ratio: 10.82; 95% CI: 5.58-20.97). Adverse events among grades 3 to 5 adverse reactions, the incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia in each regimen was higher, whereas the incidence of fever, headache, hypertension, and rash was lower. Compared with the treatment of the physician's choice, sacituzumab govitecan appears more efficacious and is the preferred third-line treatment for mTNBC.

Is Interim PET a Useful and Used Tool in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma? Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Italian Experience

INTRODUCTION Interim PET (iPET) scan after 2 cycles has been proved a useful tool in order to escalate treatment in the setting of advanced stage (AS) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) treated with ABVD as first-line therapy. However, few data are known regarding the use of iPET and the adoption of intensification treatment strategies in real life. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study in which we collected consecutive, newly diagnosed AS cHL patients (pts) treated between January 2010 and December 2018. Pts could be included if aged 18 to 80 years old, if treated with ABVD/ABVD-like schemes and if pre-treatment and interim PET scans were available. Primary endpoint was the frequence of intensification after a positive iPET. Secondary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) of pts undergoing iPET-based intensification strategies. iPET was defined as positive or negative based on the assessment by the local investigator. When available, Deauville Score (DS) was also collected. Continuous covariates were summarized as median, interquartile distance (IQR) and range, categorical variables were summarized as absolute and percentage frequencies. Survival functions were defined as the time between the date of iPET to the date of progression (PFS) or death for any cause (PFS/OS) or last clinic control (PFS/OS) for censored cases. The survival functions were computed by means of Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between groups were done using the log-rank test; the effect of covariates was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard regression model and was expressed as hazard ratio (HR), with 95%CI. All the p-values reported were two-sided. RESULTS Detailed characteristics of the 399 enrolled pts are listed in Table 1. iPET was positive in 68 pts (17%), of whom 17 (25%) were immediately shifted to intensified therapies: 8 escBEACOPP (eB), 8 chemo+ASCT (cA), 1 other salvage regimens (oSR). DS was reported in 220 (55%) pts. In iPET-positive pts, DS was reported in 35/68 pts (51,4%): 25 were DS4 and 10 were DS5, respectively. Among the 51 iPET positive pts who didn't change treatment after iPET, 31 (61%) underwent a subsequent iPET after 4 cycles. iPET4 was positive in 17 pts (55%), of whom 12 (70%) were shifted to intensified treatments: 2 eB, 8 cA, 2 oSR. Overall, 29/68 iPET-positive pts (43%) were intensified either immediately after iPET or after a subsequent iPET4 positivity and the most commonly used intensification was cA (16/29 cases). After a median follow up of 6 years (0.2 - 12), 5-y PFS was 76% (95% CI 72 to 80%), and 5-y OS was 94% (95% CI 91 to 96%). In univariable analysis, iPET positivity (5y PFS 60% versus 80% for iPET negative pts, p &amp;lt; 0.001), stage IV, age (continuous form) and not receiving radiotherapy were significantly associated with worse PFS; iPET positivity (5y OS 82% versus 96% in iPET-negative pts, p=0.003), stage IV, age ≥ 60, IPS, B symptoms, male gender and not receiving radiotherapy were significantly associated with worse OS. PFS and OS were similar (p=0.851 and 0.520, respectively) for iPET-positive pts undergoing or not undergoing immediate intensification (59% versus 61%, and 84% versus 81%, respectively) [Figure 1]. The 5-y PFS and OS were significantly different between pts with iPET negativity and iPET positivity, as reported above. Remarkably, among iPET+ pts, no treatment modification after iPET positivity (either after 2 or 4 cycles) was associated with worse 5-Y PFS and OS (72% and 82% respectively) if compared to PET negative pts. Moreover, there were no differences in terms of both PFS and OS for iPET pts who modified treatment after either iPET or iPET4. CONCLUSIONS In AS cHL pts undergoing ABVD first line treatment, iPET positivity is 17%, but few pts shifted to intensification strategies and most pts didn't change treatment and underwent to iPET4. iPET4 was positive in 17/31 pts, of whom 70% shifted to salvage treatments, mainly cA. iPET prognostic role was confirmed, since PFS and OS were strongly correlated with iPET status, but early intensification didn't provide any PFS and/or OS advantages. Due to the high prognostic role of iPET positivity, AS cHL pts might benefit from more intensive first line treatments that could reduce iPET positive cases (e.g. AVD combos with anti-PD1 or brentuximab vedotin) or from more efficacious second line therapies (e.g. Brentuximab Vedotin and/or anti-PD1 based combination strategies)

Immunological Subgroups Predicting Efficacy of Elotuzumab in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Insights from the GMMG-HD6 Clinical Trial

Introduction: Elotuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting SLAM family member 7 protein (SLAMF7) on multiple myeloma (MM) cells, has shown promise in relapsed/refractory MM when combined with immunomodulatory agents. However, its effectiveness in newly diagnosed patients did not show improved progression-free survival (PFS) nor overall survival. In a previous study we demonstrated that elotuzumab specifically depleted high SLAMF7 expressing regulatory CD8 + T cells by macrophage induced antibody dependent phagocytosis. This study aimed to identify immunological predictive factors for elotuzumab efficacy, enabling improved risk stratification and personalized treatment decisions based on the detection and quantification of SLAMF7-positive T cell subsets. Patients and Methods: This pre-planned accompanying immunological research analyzed samples from the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) HD6 clinical trial (NCT02495922). The trial investigated elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone induction and consolidation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed MM patients and found no progression-free or overall survival advantage with the addition of elotuzumab in any treatment sequence. Peripheral blood samples were collected at three time points: trial inclusion (T1), after induction therapy (T2), and during consolidation or maintenance therapy (T3). Flow cytometry was used to assess T cell subpopulations. Results: Elotuzumab during induction therapy significantly reduced the percentage of regulatory SLAMF7 high expressing CD8 + CD28 - ( p &amp;lt; 0.001) and effector CD8 + T cells ( p &amp;lt; 0.001) in MM patients after induction therapy and during maintenance therapy. A T2 landmark multivariate analysis (after induction therapy) revealed that a higher percentage of effector CD8 + T cells at T1 showed a borderline advantageous effect on the progression-free survival (PFS) ( HR = 0.98 [CI 95% 0.97; 1.00], p = 0.010) regardless of the study arm. Further, in a multivariate analysis a high regulatory CD8 + T cell level at T2 was associated with an adverse PFS in patients receiving elotuzumab in addition to lenalidomide during consolidation and maintenance (PFS from T2 for high vs. low regulatory CD8 + T cell levels at T2, HR = 3.64 [CI 95% 1.58; 8.36], p = 0.002 for patients that received elotuzumab during consolidation and maintenance only; regulatory CD8 + T cells at T2 [high versus low] HR = 5.93 [CI 95% 2.30; 15.26], p &amp;lt; 0.001 for patients that received elotuzumab during induction, consolidation and maintenance). Conclusion: The efficacy of elotuzumab in MM patients may be influenced by the frequency of regulatory CD8 + T cells after induction therapy. As high levels of regulatory CD8 + T cells showed adverse progression-free survival in MM patients, the assessment of the level of regulatory CD8 + SLAMF7 + T cells could be a prerequisite for MM patients' response to elotuzumab. This study highlights the importance of T cell level-driven immunological treatment approaches when utilizing elotuzumab.

Impact of Maintenance Rituximab Following First-Line Systemic Therapy on Outcomes in Patients with Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Real-World Evidence from 10 US Centers

Introduction First-line treatment options for patients (pts) with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) include rituximab monotherapy (R) and immunochemotherapy (IC), such as bendamustine with rituximab (BR) or RCHOP/RCVP. The efficacy of maintenance rituximab (M-R) has been studied in splenic (SMZL) and nodal (NMZL) MZL, showing a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) when M-R is administered after BR (Rummel et al., ASCO 2018). However, the role of M-R in pts with extranodal MZL (EMZL) of the mucosa-associated lymphatic tissue (MALT), or those receiving R or RCHOP/RCVP, remains uncertain. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of pts with MZL who received M-R after their first-line systemic therapy (R or IC) using data from a large multi-institutional retrospective cohort. Methods Adult pts with MZL (SMZL, NMZL, or EMZL) who were treated at 10 US medical centers from 2010 onwards were included. Pts who had received first-line treatment with either R or IC and achieved a partial (PR) or complete (CR) response to the initial therapy were divided into groups based on whether they subsequently received M-R or not. To avoid immortal-time bias, we required a minimum follow-up of 6 months from diagnosis. Outcomes included PFS, overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of histologic transformation (HT). Because of non-proportional hazards, Wilcoxon test was used to compare survival curves, and Cox models (augmented by multiple imputation to account for missing data) were bounded by 6 years of follow up. Multivariable models adjusted for prognostic factors including age, sex, performance status, stage, baseline hemoglobin, albumin, LDH, type of IC and CR/PR status at the end of therapy. Results The study included 427 pts with a median age of 63 years. Of these pts, 53% were women, and 49% had EMZL, 27% had NMZL, and 23% had SMZL. The first-line therapies received were R (54%), BR (36%), RCHOP (7%), or RCVP (3%). A CR was achieved by 70% (n=298) of pts after the initial therapy. Overall, 33% (n=140) received M-R with a median of 8 cycles. Among pts who initially had PR, 39% converted to a CR during M-R therapy. The median follow-up period was 5 years. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of receiving M-R included achieving a PR instead of a CR after the first-line therapy (41% vs 29% receiving M-R, respectively; p=0.02) and having the SMZL subtype (p=0.03, Fig 1A). Pts treated with RCHOP were less likely to receive M-R compared to those receiving other regimens (p=0.049). There was also evidence of hospital-level preference to either prescribe M-R or not. We analyzed survival outcomes separately for pts who received first-line IC or R monotherapy, stratified further by MZL subtype and the type of IC regimen. Among pts who received IC (n=197), M-R was associated with longer PFS (median of 9.0 vs. 6.8 years, p=0.008, Fig 1B). However, the statistical significance was lost in the multivariable model (adjusted HR=0.52, 95%CI=0.25-1.10). When evaluated by MZL subtype, pts with EMZL had a significantly longer PFS with M-R (p=0.01), while those with NMZL and SMZL did not (p=0.41 and 0.10, respectively). When examining the type of first-line IC, pts receiving RCHOP/RCVP had a prolonged PFS with M-R (p=0.03), whereas the difference was not statistically significant after BR (p=0.12). There was no difference in OS overall (p=0.09; adjusted HR=0.55, 95%CI=0.12-2.60) or in any subgroup. Among pts who received first-line R, there were no statistically significant differences in PFS (p=0.70; adjusted HR=0.99, 95%CI=0.59-1.66) or OS (p=0.17) based on the receipt of M-R, either in the entire cohort or any subset. A total of 14 transformation events occurred during the study, including 3 in the M-R group. The cumulative incidence of HT did not significantly differ between the two groups (sub-HR=0.76, 95%CI=0.21-2.82, p=0.68). Discussion In this large retrospective cohort study, the use of M-R in MZL was primarily influenced by local preferences, the quality of response after initial treatment, and the type of IC regimen. Receipt of M-R was associated with a longer PFS for pts receiving first-line IC, especially for those with EMZL and those receiving RCHOP/RCVP. These findings suggest a PFS advantage of M-R in EMZL, which is a novel observation. However, this advantage was not observed in terms of OS or the rate of HT. M-R after initial R did not show any significant differences in outcomes for MZL.

Comparing efficacy of first-line treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) presents significant treatment selection challenges due to limited therapeutic options. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy of multiple treatment regimens for mCRPC through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Methods: A systematically comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The network meta-analysis was employed to compare the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) among different interventions at specific time points. This study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023422823).Results: A total of 29 RCTs, involving 12,706 patients and investigating 16 interventions, were included in the analysis. Chempretarget ((capivasertib or cabozantinib) + docetaxel + prednisone)) and PARP (Olaparib or rucaparib) inhibitors emerged as interventions that significantly improved survival outcomes compared to first-line treatment in mCRPC patients. Chempretarget demonstrated superior overall survival starting from the 12th month, while PARP inhibitors showed a clear advantage in progression-free survival within the 3–18 months range. Notably, chempre ((Docetaxel or Cabazitaxel) + prednisone) exhibited favorable performance in radiographic progression-free survival during the 3–18 month period.Conclusion: Our findings underscore the efficacy of chempretarget, PARP inhibitors, and chempre in enhancing survival outcomes for mCRPC patients. Further head-to-head comparisons are warranted to validate these results. These findings carry important implications for treatment decision-making in mCRPC and may guide the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.

Impact of the Current Treatments on the Survival of Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): A Real-Life Study on Behalf of the Spanish Group of Lymphoma (GELTAMO)

Background: MCL remains incurable and its management is highly heterogeneous due to the lack of standard treatment. Since the results from prospective clinical trials are not always reproducible in real-life patients, the aim of this study was to analyze the management in clinical practice of patients with MCL in Spain and its impact on their survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical-biological characteristics and treatment patterns of patients (pts) with MCL from Spanish GELTAMO centers and their impact on overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). First-line treatments (1L) were grouped as HiDAC (high-dose cytarabine or HiDAC-based) or non-HiDAC; second-line treatments (2L) as BTKi (BTK inhibitors), CIT (chemoimmunotherapy) or other (targeted agents other than BTKi). In patients receiving 1L at diagnosis, early progression/relapse (E-POD) was considered when occurring within 24 months (m) from diagnosis and late or L-POD beyond 24 m or no relapse at data cut-off. A follow-up time (FU) of ≥24m was required for patients to be evaluable for POD, except for those dying from MCL &amp;lt;24m, recorded as E-POD. Statistical analyses were performed with the R-4.1.0 software. Results: From January 2000-March 2023, 505 patients were diagnosed with MCL in 17 GELTAMO centers, their baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. At data-cut-off, 242 (47.9%) were alive, 17 (3.4%) lost to FU and 246 (48.7%) had died, being the lymphoma the main cause of death (50.4%). Sixty-five (12.8%) pts did not receive treatment at diagnosis, out of which 18 (28%) remain on observation at a median (M) FU=26 m (3-92). Out of 479 pts receiving 1L, 245 (51%) received 2L, 143 (30%) 3L, 75 (15.6%) pts 4L and &amp;lt;10% received 5-8 lines. Among 432 pts treated upfront (no observation prior to 1L), 423 were evaluable for response: 190 (44.9%) HiDAC and 233 (55%) non-HiDAC, with a predominance of anthracycline-based treatments (Figure 1). Overall (OR) and complete responses (CR) were higher with HiDAC vs. non-HiDAC (91%/78.4% vs. 82.8%/65.2%, respectively). In 394/432 pts evaluable for POD (149 E-POD and 245 L-POD), HiDAC was more frequently associated with L-POD (73.2% L-POD vs. 26.8% E-POD) than non-HiDAC (53.1% L-POD vs. 46.9% E.POD). Rituximab maintenance (RM) was given to 167 pts (prior HiDAC 48.5%, non-HiDAC 51.5%) and 80.7% of them were L-POD. ASCT was performed in 135 pts (prior HiDAC 83.7%, non-HiDAC 16.3%, followed by RM in 46%) and 86.1% were L-POD. In 2L, 232/245 were evaluable, 92 (39.6%) received iBTK (60 monotherapy, 11 with CT and/or rituximab), 122 (52.6%) CIT (bendamustine-based 24.6%, gemcitabine-based 36.5%) and 18 (7.75%) other salvage options (Figure 1), with no significant differences between iBTK and CIT regarding baseline characteristics or efficacy (OR/CR 60.8%/39.1% vs. 72%/56.5% for BTKi and CIT, respectively). With a M FU= 87.6m, M OS= 6.56 years (5.6-8.2) and M PFS= 34.3 m (29.86-43.43). Age&amp;gt;65 at diagnosis (HR=2.09, p&amp;lt;.001), blastoid variant (HR=1.77, p=.012), Ki67≥30% (HR=1.93, p=.001), non-CR after 1L (HR=2.20, p&amp;lt;.001) and E-POD (HR=5.21, p&amp;lt;.001) were associated with shorter OS (MVA) and blastoid variant (HR=1.83, p=.001) and Ki67≥30% (HR=1.65, p=.003) with PFS. ASCT and RM were significantly associated with longer PFS (HR=0.33 and HR=0.32, p&amp;lt;.001) in the MVA but only MR had impact on OS (HR=0.62, p=.031). After 2L, M OS-2= 30.01 m (25.23-46.42) and PFS-2= 12.42m (8.97-17.02), with no impact of BTKi in 2L (vs. CIT) on OS-2 (HR=0.64, p=.12) or PFS-2 (HR=0.73, p=.12). E-POD and HR-MIPI, however, were significantly associated with shorter OS-2 (HR=1.72, p=.03 and HR=2.08, p=.03, respectively) and PFS-2 (HR=1.91, p&amp;lt;.001 and HR=1.88, p=.005 respectively). Conclusions: The impact on survival of known risk factors such as older age at diagnosis, high Ki67, HR-MIPI, blastoid morphology, non-CR after 1L or E-POD was confirmed in our series, as well as the advantage in efficacy and risk of E-POD of HiDAC-based regimens vs. non-HiDAC in 1L. Regarding RM and ASCT in 1L, our results are in line with other studies, with RM associated with longer PFS and OS and ASCT showing advantage in PFS but not in OS. In 2L, the rate of OR/CR with BTKi in our cohort is like that reported in pivotal studies, but we did not find the survival advantage of BTKi over CIT observed in other retrospective studies.

Three Decade Single-Institution Experience of Safety and Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Young Adult Patients with Medulloblastoma

The rarity of medulloblastoma in the adult population limits information on optimal treatment and clinical outcomes. Adjuvant chemoradiation has been correlated to improved overall survival (OS) in a recent National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. We performed a retrospective safety and efficacy analysis of radiation (RT) +/- adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTH) in young adult patients with medulloblastoma to better understand outcomes, prognostic factors, and possibly optimal treatment strategies. We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review on young adult (age ≥18 - 39 years old) patients with medulloblastoma treated at our institution (1992-2018) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months from completion of therapy. We gathered data on patient and disease characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes, including OS, progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and freedom from distant metastasis (FDM). We employed Cox regression model for univariable and multivariable analyses and Kaplan-Meier (KM) test methods for survival analyses, using JMP version 15.0 software. Thirty-one patients were treated with postoperative RT including craniospinal irradiation (median dose: 2340 cGy/13 fractions) followed by tumor bed/posterior fossa (median total dose: 5580 cGy/31 fractions) either alone (n = 9; 29%) or with adjuvant chemotherapy (aCTH: n = 22; 71%); mostly as per COG A9961 Regimen A: oral lomustine, intravenous cisplatin, and intravenous vincristine (n = 12). 54.6% (n = 12) were known to complete the full aCTH course. Common RT acute toxicities included G1-2 nausea and/or vomiting (N/V; n = 8) and G1-2 fatigue (n = 6). Common aCTH acute toxicities included G1-2 N/V (n = 7) and peripheral neuropathy: G1-2 (n = 6) and G3 (n = 3). Late adverse events were primarily G1-2 peripheral neuropathy and gait imbalance (22.6%), G1-2 hormonal disturbances (19.4%) and G1-2 neurocognitive impairment (16.1%). Male patients had worse OS, PFS, FDM, and LC. Age at diagnosis, tumor location (lateral vs. central), and completion of aCTH course were shown on uni- and multi-variable analysis to be significantly associated with OS; p<0.05. KM survival analysis revealed superior 10-year PFS and OS in patients who completed aCTH compared to those who received RT alone or did not complete aCTH: 72.9% vs 59.3% vs 42%, p = 0.461, and 74.1% vs 63.5% vs 40%, p = 0.033, respectively. A similar trend was noted for LC and FDM. Our series provides a report of acute and late side effects of treatment of young adult patients with medulloblastoma. Significant OS and PFS advantage are seen of aCTH completion in this patient population. Since optimal treatment of these patients is still an unmet need, prospective studies for this rare disease entity are needed.

A real-life study of daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (D-VD) in lenalidomide exposed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: a report from the Triveneto Myeloma Working Group.

Treatment of lenalidomide refractory (Len-R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients still represents an unmet clinical need. In the last years, daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (D-VD) combination was extensively used in this setting, even though only a small fraction of Len-R patients was included in the pivotal trial. This real-life study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the D-VD regimen in a cohort that exclusively enrolled Len exposed or refractory MM patients. The study cohort included 57 patients affected by relapsed/refractory MM. All patients were previously exposed to Len, with 77.2% being refractory. The overall response rate (ORR) was 79.6% with 43% of cases obtaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR). The D-VD regimen showed a favorable safety profile, with low frequency of grade 3-4 adverse events, except for thrombocytopenia observed in 21.4% of patients. With a median follow-up of 13 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months. No significant PFS differences were observed according to age, ISS, LDH levels, type of relapse, and high-risk FISH. Len exposed patients displayed a PFS advantage as compared to Len refractory patients (29 vs 16 months, p = 0.2876). Similarly, patients treated after Len maintenance showed a better outcome as compared to patients who had received a full-dose Len treatment (23 vs 13 months, p = 0.1728). In conclusion, our real-world data on D-VD combination showed remarkable efficacy in Len-R patients, placing this regimen as one of the standards of care to be properly taken into account in this MM setting.

Fulvestrant plus vandetanib versus placebo for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitor therapy (FURVA): a multicentre, Phase 2, randomised controlled trial

BackgroundFURVA, a randomised, double-blind Phase II trial, investigated whether the addition of vandetanib to fulvestrant improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with an aromatase inhibitor(AI)-resistant advanced breast cancer.MethodsPostmenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+ve)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who experienced disease progression on an AI, were randomised (1:1) to fulvestrant 500 mg (Q28) with vandetanib 300 mg od (f + v) or placebo (f + p) until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and the influence of REarranged during Transfection (RET) signalling on outcomes.ResultsIn total, 165 participants were randomised to f + v (n = 80) or f + p (n = 85). Median PFS was 5.5 months (m) for f + v compared to 5.5 m for f + p (hazard ratio (HR) 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62–1.23; P = 0.22). Unexpectedly, high total RET expression was associated with a PFS advantage of 8.87 m vs 3.94 with low RET (HR 0.493: 95% CI 0.32–0.77; P = 0.002) independent of the treatment arm, supported by an OS advantage 21.95 m vs 18.04 (HR 0.584; 95% CI 0.34–1.00; P = 0.051) in the high-RET group.ConclusionThe addition of vandetanib to fulvestrant does not improve PFS. However, high total RET expression was associated with improved PFS, suggesting RET may have a prognostic role in patients treated with fulvestrant.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02530411.