Negative Programmed Death Ligand 1 Research Articles

Folate Receptor Alpha Expression and the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Folate receptor α (FRα) is a cell-surface protein and an attractive target for cancer treatment. We investigated the association between FRα expression and the tumor immune microenvironment in patients with cervical cancer. We examined whole tumor sections of 123 patients with cervical cancer: 67 and 56 sections of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC, respectively. FRα expression was assessed using immunohistochemical staining with the anti-FRα monoclonal antibody clone 26B3. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was assessed using a combined positive score (CPS). The intratumoral CD3 and CD8 cell densities were calculated as the average number of positive cells in five independent areas. FRα-positivity was identified in 72.4% of the patients, and it differed by histology (SCC vs. non-SCC; 55.2% vs. 92.9%, P<0.001). PD-L1 status was positive (CPS ≥1) in 75.6% and was more commonly expressed in patients with SCC (SCC vs. non-SCC; 83.5% vs. 66.1%, P=0.02). FRα expression had a weak correlation with PD-L1 expression (r=-0.22, P<0.001) and CD8-positive cells (r=-0.19, P=0.03). FRα-positivity was more frequently observed in the PD-L1 CPS <10 group than in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 group (81% vs. 64%, P=0.03). FRα-high was significantly associated with poor prognosis, especially in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 groups (hazard ratio: 4.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.39-12.06, P=0.01). In conclusion, FRα expression was higher in patients with cervical cancer and PD-L1 CPS <10 than in those with CPS ≥10. Targeting FRα expression may be a potential therapeutic strategy for cervical cancer patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression.

Multi-index comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and response mechanism of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

This research conducted multi-index comprehensive evaluations of the immunotherapeutic efficacy and response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-five patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) wild-type advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy were included. Immunohistochemistry was adopted to detect the expression levels of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) with X-ray cross-complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) and excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) proteins in tumor tissues. Flow cytometry was utilized to measure the levels of T-cell subsets in peripheral blood before and after treatment. PCR-RELP method was employed to evaluate XRCC1 and ERCC1 gene polymorphisms in peripheral blood. According to the treatment effect, patients evaluated as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) were categorized into the immune response group, and patients evaluated as progressive disease (PD) were categorized into the immune unresponsive group. The correlation between PD-L1 protein expression, XRCC1 and ERCC1 protein expression, gene polymorphisms, T-cell subpopulation levels, and treatment efficacy was analyzed. The therapeutic efficacy of patients with positive PD-L1 expression was better than that of patients with negative PD-L1 expression (P < 0.05). After treatment, peripheral blood CD3+ and CD4+ cell levels and Thl/Th2 cell levels were higher and CD8+ T cells were lower in the immune response group than in the immune unresponsive group (P < 0.05). Among the patients in the immune response group, peripheral blood CD3+ and CD4+ cell levels were higher and CD8+ T cells were lower in patients with positive PD-L1 expression than in patients with negative PD-L1 expression (P < 0.05). In the XRCC1 gene, the proportion of patients in the immune response group carrying the Arg/Trp + Trp/Trp genotype was higher than that of patients in the immune unresponsive group (P < 0.05). In the ERCC1 gene, the proportion of patients in the immune response group carrying the C/T + T/T genotype was higher than that of patients in the immune unresponsive group (P < 0.05). The positive expression rates of XRCC1 and ERCC1 in patients in the immune unresponsive group were higher than those in the immune response group (P < 0.05). PD-L1 protein expression, XRCC1 and ERCC1 protein expression, and gene polymorphisms are associated with immunotherapy outcome in EGFR/ALK wild-type advanced NSCLC patients, and may be biological indicators for predicting immunotherapy outcome in EGFR/ALK wild-type advanced NSCLC patients.

Concordance of PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) analysis between primary gastric cancer and matched peritoneal metastasis.

e16068 Background: Peritoneum represents one of the most common metastatic sites of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) and is associated with poor prognosis. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a recognized predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first-line setting. However, data from pivotal trials showed poorer clinical efficacy of ICIs in the sub-set of patients with peritoneal involvement, regardless of PD-L1 score magnitude. Here, we investigated the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and matched peritoneal metastasis. Methods: PD-L1 expression according to CPS was determined by immunohistochemistry using VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assays on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues derived from 22 patients treated at our institution for advanced GEA from September 2015 to August 2023. Concordance rate of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and matched peritoneal metastasis using PD-L1 CPS cut-off of 1 and 5 was reported (spatial heterogeneity); additionally, concordance between PD-L1 value before and after the administration of systemic treatments was analyzed (temporal heterogeneity). Results: 12(54.5%)/5(22.7%) primary tumor samples and 12(54.5%)/1(4.5%) peritoneal metastases showed PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1/ ≥ 5, respectively. Concordance of PD-L1 CPS between primary and peritoneal specimens was 54.5% and 72.7% according to CPS cuts-off of 1 and 5, respectively, highlighting marked spatial heterogeneity. High concordance rate (94%) was reported between negative PD-L1 CPS primary tumor samples and matched peritoneal metastases, against the cut-off of CPS ≥ 5; in contrast, none of the positive primary tumor samples retained PD-L1 expression in the peritoneum. Evident temporal heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression was also observed, with 56% concordance against CPS ≥ 5 in the pre- versus post-treatment comparison. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression in GEA is characterized by spatial and temporal heterogeneity which is more prominent for lower CPS cut-offs values. This evidence could hamper its role as predictive biomarker for ICIs. The high intra-patient discordance rate of PD-L1 CPS expression between positive primary tumor samples and matched peritoneal metastases suggests that peritoneal specimens should not be recommended as the preferred source for PD-L1 assessment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Clinical insights, immunopathologic profiling, and prognostic implications from a single-center study.

e14665 Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy of the peritoneum. In patients with advanced disease, therapeutic options are limited, and prognosis is usually poor. While the role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in MPM is evolving, clinical data is scarce and there are currently no biomarkers to predict response to ICI therapy in this population. Methods: Patients treated at the Sheba Medical Center between 2016-2022 have been examined with the aim of delineating the clinical and immunopathologic characteristics of MPM, including programmed-death ligand-1 (PDL-1) status. Results: Forty-two patients with MPM were treated at Sheba during the study period. Eight patients (19%) have received immunotherapy as a single treatment in our cohort, all as ≥2 line of treatment. Of these patients, 3 patients (37.5%) had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best response, 3 patients (37.5%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 patients (25%) had progressive disease. Median overall survival (OS) among responding patients (CR/PR) and patients with clinical benefit (CR/PR/SD) were 6.8 years and 5.2 years, respectively, noticeably higher than the median OS for MPM (2.5 years). PDL-1 status was available for 23 patients: 17/23 (74%) had negative PDL-1 status and 6/23 (26%) had positive PDL-1 status. No correlation was observed in PDL-1 status among patients experiencing clinical benefit from treatment with ICIs. Conclusions: ICI therapy could be considered as a reasonable option for second-line therapy and beyond for MPM, with selected patients who may substantially benefit from these treatments. PDL-1 status did not correlate with treatment benefit, which highlights the limitation of this biomarker as a predictor of response in MPM patients.

Comparison of the efficacy of first‑/second‑generation EGFR‑tyrosine kinase inhibitors and osimertinib for EGFR‑mutant lung cancer with negative or low PD‑L1 expression.

In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative or low programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, the acquisition rate of the T790M mutation is higher after treatment with first-/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the progression-free survival (PFS) is longer in patients treated with osimertinib. The present study compared the clinical course after the initiation of each EGFR-TKI monotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression who were treated with EGFR-TKI monotherapy were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed. Between June 2013 and November 2023, 26 and 29 patients were treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib, respectively. The PFS time was longer in patients treated with osimertinib (median, 22.5 months) than in those treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 12.9 months). However, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration, defined as the PFS for osimertinib, or the sum of the PFS for first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and sequential osimertinib therapy after the acquisition of the T790M mutation, was similar between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 23.0 months) and osimertinib (median, 22.5 months). The Cox proportional hazard model suggested that there was no significant difference in the EGFR-TKI treatment duration between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and patients treated with osimertinib (hazard ratio, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.13). In conclusion, first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib were associated with a similar EGFR-TKI treatment duration in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. The findings suggested that both treatments are promising for this population.

Prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in advanced gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy: evidence from published studies and a Chinese single center cohort

BackgroundIdentification of prognostic biomarkers for outcomes in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with immunotherapy is important. This study investigated the relationship between the prognostic biomarker, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (preNLR), and immunotherapeutic outcomes in patients with advanced GI cancer.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting predictive values for preNLR in patients with advanced GI cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). The primary outcomes considered were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS and OS were pooled using a random effects model. We then validated the results observed in an in-house cohort of patients treated with ICIs for advanced GI cancers. Other prognostic factors for PFS and OS were explored using Cox proportional hazard analyses.ResultsOverall, 27 observational studies involving 3,610 patients with advanced GI cancer were included. Patients with higher preNLR were associated with poorer PFS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.50–1.92) and OS (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.82–3.03) with ICI treatment. Subgroup analyses based on NLR cut-off value, research center, sample size, and ICI drugs used were consistent with the primary results. A retrospective analysis of the in-house patient cohort validated these results (PFS: HR 3.173, 95% CI 2.314–4.351; OS: HR 3.004, 95% CI 1.837–4.912). Multivariable Cox regression analysis of 174 patients showed that higher preNLR and negative programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression were independently, significantly, and unfavorably associated with PFS and OS.ConclusionPreNLR might be an effective prognostic biomarker for patients with advanced GI cancer treated with ICIs.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to an increase in randomized controlled trials exploring various first-line combination treatment regimens. With the introduction of new PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, there are now more clinical options available. For the first time, the AK105 monoclonal antibody Penpulimab, developed in China, was included. The AK105-302 Phase III trial studied the efficacy and safety of Penpulimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC. To determine the optimal treatment options, we conducted an updated network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of these regimens. The system retrieves data from Chinese and English electronic databases, Clinical Trials, and the gov Clinical Trial Registration website up to September 6, 2023. The study indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination regimens, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), all-grade adverse events, and above-grade III adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) level, histological type, ECOG score, sex, and smoking history. Nineteen RCTS were included, with a total of ten thousand eight hundred patients. Penpulimab plus chemotherapy (Pen + CT) provided the best OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81) for PD-L1 patients with non-selective advanced NSCLC. Except Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (Niv + Ipi), other PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapies significantly extended PFS compared with CT, and Nivolumab plus Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy (Niv + Bev + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.74) provided the best PFS benefit and was comparable to Pen + CT (HR = 1.0) for PFS prolongation. For ORR, except Niv + Ipi, all the other regimens significantly improved ORR compared with CT. In terms of safety, except Tor + CT, the incidence of any-grade AEs or grade ≥ 3 adverse events may be higher than those of chemotherapy. The subgroup analysis revealed that for patients with PD-L1 levels below 1%, treatment with Tor + CT resulted in the best progression-free survival (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.86). For patients with PD-L1 levels of 1% or higher, Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (Sin + CT) (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31-0.99) and Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (Cam + CT) (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64) were associated with the best overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively. For patients with SqNSCLC, combined immunotherapy may provide greater survival benefits. For patients with Non-sqNSCLC, Niv + Bev + CT and Tor + CT were associated with optimal PFS and OS, respectively. Cam + CT provided the best PFS in male patients with a history of smoking and an ECOG score of 0. In both female and non-smoking patient subgroups, Pem + CT was associated with the best PFS and OS benefits. For patients with advanced non-selective PD-L1 NSCLC, two effective regimens are Pen + CT and Niv + Bev + CT, which rank first in OS and PFS among all patients. Cam + CT and Tor + CT have advantages for OS in patients with SqNSCLC and Non-sqNSCLC, respectively. Niv + Ipi + CT provided the best OS benefit for patients with an ECOG score of 0, while Pem + CT may be the most effective treatment for patients with an ECOG score of 1. Pem + CT has a better effect on female patients and non-smokers. Sin + CT was found to be the most effective treatment for male patients and the smoking subgroup, while Cam + CT was found to be the most effective for PFS. In addition, Tor + CT was associated with the best PFS for patients with negative PD-L1 expression. Pem + CT was found to significantly improve both PFS and OS compared to CT alone. For patients with positive PD-L1 expression, Sin + CT and Cam + CT were found to be optimal for OS and PFS, respectively. It is important to note that, with the exception of Tor + CT, the toxicity of the other combinations was higher than that of CT alone.

Correlation between estrogen receptor and programmed death ligand-1 in type I endometrial cancer

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of estrogen receptor (ER) on programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in type I endometrial cancer (EC). Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included 85 patients with type I EC who underwent surgery at Dr. Soetomo Hospital between 2018 and 2022. A random sampling technique was employed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with ER and PD-L1 antibodies was performed on all samples. In this study, ER expression served as the independent variable, while PD-L1 expression was considered the dependent variable. Data analysis was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient test. ResultsOut of the 85 patients with type I EC, 58 (68.2%) exhibited positive and 27 (31.8%) exhibited negative ER expression. Meanwhile positive PD-L1 expression was seen in 67 (78.8%) and 18 (21.2%) exhibited negative PD-L1 expression. The study revealed a strong negative correlation between ER and PD-L1 expression in EC (rho value = −0.886, p-value = 0.0001). ConclusionER downregulates PD-L1 in type I EC. The findings of this study can be used as reference data and as the basis for further research, especially investigations of the prognostic and immunotherapeutic value of ER and PD-L1 expression in type I EC.

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in metastatic RET-mutated lung cancer from real-world retrospective data

BackgroundThe impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based treatments on non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with RET fusions remains poorly understood.MethodsWe screened patients with RET fusions at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and included those who were treated with ICIs based regimens for further analysis. We evaluated clinical indicators including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 232 patients with RET fusions were included in the study. Of these, 129 patients had their programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) expression levels tested, with 22 patients (17.8%) having a PDL1 level greater than or equal to 50%. Additionally, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status was evaluated in 35 patients, with the majority (30/35, 85.8%) having a TMB of less than 10 mutations per megabase. Out of the 38 patients treated with ICI based regimens, the median PFS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4–7.6 months) and the median OS was 19 months (95% CI: 9.7–28.3 months) at the time of data analysis. Stratification based on treatment lines did not show any significant differences in OS (18 vs. 19 months, p = 0.63) and PFS (6 vs. 5 months, p = 0.86). The ORR for patients treated with ICIs was 26.3%. Furthermore, no significant differences were found for PFS (p = 0.27) and OS (p = 0.75) between patients with positive and negative PDL1 expression. Additionally, there was no significant difference in PD-L1 levels (p = 0.10) between patients who achieved objective response and those who did not.ConclusionsPatients with RET fusion positive NSCLCs may not benefit from ICI based regimens and therefore should not be treated with ICIs in clinical practice.

Immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with negative programmed death-ligand 1 expression: a literature review.

Lung cancer, mainly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is a serious threat to human life. In particular, the prognosis for advanced patients is poor, with the 5-year survival rate being exceedingly low. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibition has changed the pattern of the treatment of a variety of cancers, including lung cancer; however, not all patients can benefit from immunotherapy, and thus finding the right biomarkers is particularly important for guiding precise treatment. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is one of the most valuable biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of lung cancer immunotherapy. Several studies have confirmed that patients with high PD-L1 expression are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy, but there is a high proportion of people with negative PD-L1 expression constituting a patient population that cannot be ignored. This article reviews the distribution of PD-L1 expression, the methods for evaluating PD-L1, and the effectiveness of immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC with negative PD-L1 expression. We performed a literature review to identify relevant data published until September 2022. In order to organize related information, we searched for literature in PubMed; abstracts and reports published in the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC), and other congresses; and clinical trial information registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Information on the distribution of PD-L1 expression, detection of PD-L1, and immunotherapy efficacy for NSCLC with negative PD-L1 expression was collated and reviewed. The incidence of PD-L1 expression in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC is similar in all regions of the world, but PD-L1 expression level is associated with certain clinicopathological features. The expression of PD-L1 can be evaluated by various detecting methods. Some immunotherapy regimens have better efficacy than traditional chemotherapy in patients with negative PD-L1 expression. Patients with NSCLC and negative PD-L1 expression can receive better survival benefits under some immunotherapy types, and these may represent a better treatment option for this relatively small patient population.

Plasma cell-free RNA PD-L1 or tissue PD-L1 protein expression and outcomes with first-line immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundTissue programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) protein expression is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment benefit in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, tissue PD-L1 protein testing is limited by sampling tumor heterogeneity and fraught with tissue acquisition difficulties. A liquid biopsy-based PD-L1 assay could overcome these limitations of tissue PD-L1 testing. MethodsAn observational cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line ICI-based therapies were retrospectively assessed for a pre-planned endpoint of median and 3-year landmark overall survival (OS) based upon plasma cell-free RNA (cfRNA) PD-L1 expression by a commercial exosome-free real-time qPCR assay or tissue PD-L1 protein expression (Dako 22C3) performed in CLIA/CAP accredited laboratories. Results53 contemporaneous patients in 3 patient cohorts were compared with a median follow-up 34 months. 16 patients were cfRNA plasma PD-L1 positive, including 6 (37 %) tissue PD-L1 negative or tissue quantity not sufficient for testing; 16 were plasma PD-L1 negative but tissue PD-L1 positive; 21 were both plasma and tissue PD-L1 negative. OS was identical whether positive plasma cfRNA PD-L1 expression or positive tissue PD-L1 protein expression (median OS 15 months; 3-year landmark OS 30 %; hazard ratio (HR) 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.44–2.10; p-value = 0.93). Within the positive plasma PD-L1 cohort there was no differing OS whether tissue PD-L1 positive, negative, or unknown (median OS 15 months; 3-year landmark OS 30 %; HR 1.15; 95 % CI, 0.322–4.05; p-value = 0.81). Positive plasma cfRNA expression was associated with a numerically longer median and higher 3-year OS compared to patients lacking PD-L1 expression (median 15 months versus 8 months; 3-year landmark OS 30 % versus 15 %; HR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.26–1.20; p-value = 0.11). ConclusionsIn this retrospective study of real-world metastatic NSCLC patients, plasma cfRNA PD-L1 expression was similarly predictive of ICI benefit as tissue PD-L1 protein expression.

PD-1 Blockade Combined with R-CHOP in Patients with Newly Diagnosed EBV-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Background Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) -positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (EBV+ DLBCL) is a relatively rare aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Most patients present with advanced disease, high incidence of extranodal involvement of 30% to 80% (Keane, Eur J Haematol, 2019), as well as poor prognosis when treated with immunochemotherapy. However, no consensus on standard treatment has been established by now. It was found that the expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) was increased in EBV+ DLBCL (Kim, Cancer Res Treat, 2019). In addition, chronic EBV infection results in T-cell exhaustion that can be reversed by PD-1 blockade. Compared with PD-L1-positive EBV-negative DLBCL cell lines, the application of PD-1 blockade in PD-L1-positive EBV+ DLBCL cell lines can significantly restore T cell proliferation and activity(Quan, PLoS One, 2015), suggesting that targeting the PD-L1/PD-1 pathway represents a potential therapy for EBV+ DLBCL. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the data of nineteen patients with EBV+ DLBCL who were treated with PD-1 blockade combined with RCHOP in our center, hoping to provide reference for subsequent research. Methods Eligible pts had treatment-naive histologically confirmed diagnosis of EBV+ DLBCL. Additional eligibility criteria included at least one measurable lesion, acceptable haptic and hematological function. Pts with primary CNS lymphoma, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, secondary CNS involvement were excluded. Additional exclusion criteria included history of immune system disease, uncontrolled infection. Once deemed eligible, pts will receive six cycles of RCHOP combined with PD-1 blockade(21 days per cycle) as induction therapy and subsequently maintenance with PD-1 blockade for 1 year(21 days per cycle). End of treatment(EOT) responses were assessed by PET-CT according to the Lugano Classification 2014. The primary objective was to assess the overall response rate(ORR) at EOT. Results Between May 1, 2019, and Sep 1, 2022, 19 pts were enrolled. Pts' baseline demographics, clinical and pathological characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age was 64 years old without significant gender difference. The majority of pts were intermediate- to high-risk by IPI. EBV DNA can be detected in blood serum at diagnosis in more than half of all patients. No patient was diagnosed with double expressor lymphoma among 18 specimens that were detected c-Myc and BCL-2 with immumohistochemical staining. EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) was positive(&amp;gt;80% of the tumor cells) in all specimens. PD-L1 positivity(&amp;gt;10% of the tumor cells) or CD30 positivity(&amp;gt;5% of the tumor cells) was also quite common. Besides, no double hit lymphoma was confirmed in patient with Fluorescence situ hybridization test(n=13). Treatment course and efficacy evaluation of all pts are summarized in Figure 1. All patients enrolled in this study had completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Totally, the ORR at EOT was 94.7%, and all achieved CMR. The ORR of patients with PD-L1 positivity(n=10) was numerically higher than that of patients with negative PD-L1 expression (n=5) (100% vs 80%). EBV DNA detected in blood serum of thirteen patients have decreased to undetectable level after induction therapy. The immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were emphatically analyzed. One patient had recurrent fever after every dose of PD-1 blockade without obvious evidence of infection. Another patient developed grade 3 diarrhea since the second cycle of PD-1 blockade maintenance. Colonoscopy showed mucosal swelling and multiple superficial ulcers in the whole colon, which indicated immune colonitis. Maintenance therapy was therefore discontinued. No irAE was observed in the rest of patients. With a median follow-up time of 13.1m (7.2-38.5m), the median PFS and OS were not reached. Both of 1 year OS and PFS was 89.5%. Overall, 2 pts experienced disease progression (1 at EOT, 1 at 2 months after ASCT), 2 pts died (1 due to progressive disease, 1 due to COVID-19 infection ). Conclusions PD-1 blockade combined with R-CHOP as induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed EBV+ DLBCL has demonstrated satisfactory response and limited irAEs. Longer follow-up is still warranted to confirm the long-term benefit, especially for patients with maintenance of PD-1 blockade. Still, we believe this therapeutic strategy can be regarded as a successful attempt at improving prognosis for pts with EBV+ DLBCL.

Expression of programmed death-ligand 1, IRF1 and CD8 T lymphocyte infiltration in a primary subset of breast cancer patients in Sudan

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the protein expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in breast cancer (BC) tissues and link this data with estrogen status, the expression of interferon regulatory factor1 (IRF-1), and CD8+T lymphocyte infiltration by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We also attempted to identify the association between PD-L1 expression, the cell proliferation index marker (Ki67), and lymph node involvement. MethodsOne hundred and fifty formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks of breast tissue were acquired from Sudanese females via The National Public Health Laboratory. FFPE blocks were subjected to antigen/antibody detection by IHC with antibodies raised against PD-L1, IRF1, and CD8. These data were analyzed alongside data extracted from medical records relating to estrogen receptor (ER) status, Ki67 index, and lymph node (LN) status. ResultsIHC analysis revealed a significant association between PD-L1 and CD8 (p = 0.010). In addition, regression analysis indicated the ability of IRF1 to induce PD-L1 expression levels in IRF1-positive cases that were two-fold higher than IRF1-deficient cases (odds ratio [OR]: 2.441 p = 0.035). Analysis also suggested that PD-L1 exerts impact on cell proliferation, as reflected by the Ki67 index. An independent t test showed that higher Ki67 scores were more frequent among PD-L1-positive patients than in PD-L1-negative patients (t = 2.608 p = 0.014). There was an inverse association between PD-L1 and ER status; ER-positive tumors exhibited negative PD-L1 expression and vice versa (p = 0.04). Furthermore, we investigated the prognostic value of PD-L1 by evaluating the association between PD-L1 and LNs dispersed variably with tumor cells; there was no statistically significant relationship between these factors (p > 0.05). ConclusionThe expression of PD-L1 and IRF-1, along with the infiltration of CD8, represents a potent panel of biomarkers with which to identify BC patients with the highest probabilities of achieving an excellent response to immune therapy, particularly when taking ER status into account, as ER expression levels are known to be high when immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) generate a poor response.

Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 Expression in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis.

Recently, many studies have explored the relationship between the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prognosis in gastric cancer, but there is still controversy. Additionally, few studies have specifically investigated the expression of PD-L1 in patients with peritoneal metastasis. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of PD-L1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. The combined positive score (CPS) was calculated to evaluate the expression of PD-L1, and the clinicopathological data were analyzed to explore prognostic significance. In total, 147 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. The negative PD-L1 expression was defined as a CPS < 1, and high PD-L1 expression was defined as a CPS ≥ 10. PD-L1 expression with CPS ≥ 1 and CPS-negative was detected in 67 (45.58%) and 80 (54.42%) patients, respectively. High PD-L1 expression at PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 was detected in 21(14.29%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.53 months in the CPS < 10 group and 27.00 months in the CPS ≥ 10 group; the OS difference between the two groups was significant (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) (p = 0.002) and severe peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with poor survival, while palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.002) and high PD-L1 expression (p = 0.008) were independent and significantly favorable prognostic factors. Our study demonstrated that PD-L1 expression was widely presented in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, while a CPS no less than 10 predicted better prognosis.

Abstract 1403: Comprehensive characterization of 1038 Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients of different PD-L1 expression levels

Abstract Background: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is currently one of the most well-characterized markers for predicting response to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiple clinicohistologic and genetic characteristics have been proposed as correlates of PD-L1 expression. However, few studies have examined the associations between PD-L1 expression and immune infiltration or chromosomal arm-level alterations. In this comprehensive characterization, we identified clinical features, oncogenic drivers and other genomic abnormalities, impaired biological pathways, arm-level amplifications and losses, and infiltration of immune cell populations that were associated with PD-L1 expression. Methods: We retrospectively included 1038 NSCLC patients who had both PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) by the 22C3 assay and genomic profiles acquired with targeted sequencing using 8-, 168-, and 520-gene panels (Burning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, China). Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) was used to analyze immune infiltration. Association analysis was performed to identify patient characteristics associated with PD-L1 expression. Results: The negative (TPS &amp;lt;1%), low (1-49%), and high (≥50%) PD-L1 expression classes accounted for 25.2% (n = 262), 43.2% (n = 449), and 31.5% (n = 327) patients, respectively. PD-L1 expression was positively associated with advanced tumor stage, the male sex, squamous carcinoma, ALK fusions, KRAS G12/13X mutations, BRAF V600E, ROS1 fusion, MET exon 14 skipping, altered TP53, LPR1B, FAT1, PTPRD, KDR, and CD274, and altered pathways such as MAPK, RAS, DNA damage response, p53 signaling, and checkpoint factors. The negative correlates included driver-positive status, EGFR L858R, EGFR exon 19 deletions, ERBB2 exon 20 insertions, altered RMB10, STK11, RICTOR, GNAS, and PIK3C2G, and aberrant receptor tyrosine kinase, ERBB2 signaling, and non-homologous end joining. In terms of arm-level aberrations, PD-L1 positivity was associated with 3p, 3q, 7p or 7q amplification and 18p, 20p, or 20q deletion. We also found that 9p, 9q, 10p, 12p, 12q, and 19p amplifications were most frequent in high PD-L1-high patients, who were also more likely to harbor 18p, 29p, or 20q deletion when compared with compared with PD-L1-negative patients. mIHC analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression was associated with proportions of CD3+, CD3+CD8+, CD3+PD-1+, CD8+PD-1+, and PD-1+ cells in the tumor and CD3+PD-1+, CD8+PD-1+, and PD-1+ cells in the stroma, suggesting increased tumor infiltration of cytotoxic T cells associated with PD-L1 expression. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the associations between PD-L1 expression and a multitude of histopathologic, genomic, and immunologic features. Further research is warranted for validation and association of these factors with clinical outcomes. Citation Format: Weiqiang Yin, Jinghao Liang, Zhihua Guo, Zixian Xie, Haonan Zhao, Fayuan Wu. Comprehensive characterization of 1038 Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients of different PD-L1 expression levels [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1403.

Long-Term Response to PD-1 and CTLA-4 Blockade in an SCLC Patient with Negative PD-L1 Expression on Biopsy: A Case Report

Despite recent advances in the availability of new therapeutic agents, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. While immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell histologies, results in SCLC have shown overall less favorable evolution, and despite initial data from different trials showing potential for development, the lack of reliable biomarkers for patient selection is a major hindrance to their use. Most notably, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression does not appear to play a key role in SCLC responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibition. While other biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB) have been suggested to be more relevant, literature data are not univocal on this subject. We report here on a 58-year-old patient with metastatic PD-L1-negative SCLC treated in an advanced and symptomatic setting who obtained a complete and sustained clinical and radiological response to the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. We also discuss the impact of treatment-related adverse events, such as autoimmune hypothyroidism, gastroenteric toxicity and pneumonitis, on his quality of life. This case, while it exemplifies the potential of immune checkpoint inhibition in SCLC, highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying its efficacy in order to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in biliary tract cancer with KRAS mutation.

With a 15% incidence, KRAS is one of the most common mutations in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and is a poor prognostic factor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as salvage therapy have modest activity in BTC. There are limited data on the efficacy of ICIs according to KRAS mutation in BTC. We evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in BTC patients with or without KRAS mutations. Retrospective observational study. We conducted molecular profiling in BTC patients who received ICIs as salvage therapy. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells was assessed using immunohistochemistry. The TruSightTM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI in BTC patients according to KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. A total of 62 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 68.0 years; 47 patients (75.8%) received pembrolizumab and 15 (24.2%) received nivolumab as salvage therapy. All patients received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the frontline therapy, and 53.2% received fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) before ICI. The median number of lines of prior chemotherapy was 2.5. The KRAS mutation was found in 13 patients (19.1%), and 28 patients (45.2%) showed 1% or more of tumor cells out of visible tumor cells positive for PD-L1. There was no statistical correlation between KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. The median OS and PFS with ICI were 5.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-8.0] and 3.8 (IQR: 3.0-4.5) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS with ICIs according to KRAS mutation (mutant type versus wild type) and PD-L1 expression (positive versus negative). In subgroup analysis, patients with both KRAS mutation and PD-L1 positivity had longer PFS compared with patients with KRAS mutation and PD-L1 negativity (10.1 versus 2.6 months, p = 0.047). This finding was not shown in patients with wild-type KRAS. Our analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a useful biomarker for ICIs in BTC patients with KRAS mutation but not in those with wild-type KRAS.

The Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 on Immune Cells Is Related to a Better Prognosis in Biliary Tract Cancer.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor cells is associated with a poor biliary tract cancer (BTC) prognosis; tumor-infiltrating immune cells in the tumor microenvironment are associated with a better prognosis. The effect of PD-L1 expression on immune cells on survival is unclear. We investigated the relationship between PD-L1 expression in immune cells and BTC prognosis. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using an anti-PD-L1 22C3 mouse monoclonal primary antibody, and its relationships with clinical characteristics and prognosis were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model to investigate the prognostic performance of PD-L1 in BTC. Among 144 analyzed cases, patients with positive PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and negative PD-L1 expression in immune cells showed poorer overall survival rates than those exhibiting other expressions (tumor cells: hazard ratio [HR]=1.023, p<0.001; immune cells: HR=0.983, p=0.021). PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was an independent predictor of poor overall survival (HR=1.024, p<0.001). In contrast, PD-L1 expression in immune cells was a predictive marker of good prognosis (HR=0.983, p=0.018). PD-L1 expression in immune cells may be used as an independent factor to evaluate the prognosis of patients with BTC.

PEOPLE (NCT03447678), a first-line phase II pembrolizumab trial, in negative and low PD-L1 advanced NSCLC: clinical outcomes and association with circulating immune biomarkers

The PEOPLE trial aimed to identify new immune biomarkers in negative and low programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (0%-49%) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab. Here we report the main outcomes and the circulating immune biomarkers analysis. The primary endpoint of this phase II trial was the identification of immune biomarkers associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety were secondary endpoints. Absolute cell counts for 36 subsets belonging to innate and adaptive immunity were determined by multiparametric flow cytometry in peripheral blood at baseline and at first radiologic evaluation. An orthoblique principal components-based clustering approach and multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for clinical variables were used to analyze immune variables and their correlation with clinical endpoints. From May 2018 to October 2020, 65 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median PFS was 2.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.6 months] and median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI 8.7-17.1 months). The ORR was 21.5%, DCR was 47.7% and median DoR was 14.5 months (95% CI 6.4-24.9 months). Drug-related grade 3-4 adverse events were 9.2%. Higher T cell and natural killer (NK) cell count at baseline and at the first radiologic evaluation were associated with improved PFS, DCR and OS. On the contrary, higher myeloid cell count at baseline or at the first radiologic evaluation was significantly associated with worse OS and DCR. Circulating immune biomarkers can contribute to predict outcomes in negative and low PD-L1 aNSCLC patients treated with first-line single-agent pembrolizumab.

Predictors of survival to immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive poor benefit from immunotherapy (IO). For some of them, adding chemotherapy (CT) can improve the outcomes, but the reliability of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as the only biomarker to distinguish these patients is unsatisfactory. We sought to detect clinicopathological and molecular predictive factors of survival that might be added to PD-L1 expression in the selection of patients who should receive IO alone or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled clinical trials investigating IO, alone or with CT, vs CT alone in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate IO alone vs CT, CIT vs CT, and IO alone vs CIT. A total of 14 367 patients with advanced NSCLC across 25 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Squamous histology, male sex, current and former smoker status, PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival with IO alone compared with CT. Conversely, female sex, no smoking history, negative PD-L1 expression, and low TMB correlated with unsatisfactory outcomes with IO alone vs CT but not with CIT vs CT. CIT improved survival vs IO alone in female patients, never smokers, those having a PD-L1 expression of 1% or more (but not with a PD-L1 of ≥ 50%) or a low TMB and in patients with central nervous system metastasis. These findings suggest some clinicopathological and molecular features that, added to PD-L1 expression, could help in the selection of the most appropriate first-line IO-based treatment for advanced NSCLC patients.