Programmed Death-ligand 1 Combined Positive Score Research Articles

Abstract PO5-16-07: Unveiling the Landscape of PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Subtypes in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known for its aggressive behavior with poor survival outcomes. Influenced by different expression levels of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and several subtypes of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in TNBC response to treatment and progression. Objective: To assess the prevalence and prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in advanced TNBC, defined as unresectable stage III or stage IV disease, in patients treated with a standard cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen. TILs composition was also evaluated as an exploratory objective. Methods: The internal database of the Brazilian National Cancer Institute was queried out for women diagnosed and treated with advanced TNBC from January 2018 to December 2022. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of a maximum of four years old were analyzed. PD-L1 expression using 22C3 pharmDX assay was estimated through combined positive score (CPS) dichotomization (CPS < 10 vs. CPS≥10). Tissue microarrays comprising the samples of biopsies were subjected to immunohistochemistry, targeting specific markers including CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, CD68, CD117, FOXP3, PD-1, the immune cell profiles were carefully examined and their correlation with the PD-L1 CPS was determined. Results: A total of 150 patients were included. The expression of PD-L1 was undetermined in 2 cases. The median age was 51.5 years (IQR 41.8-60.2) and 20.9% of the cases had CPS≥10. Most patients were < 65 years (73.0%), were postmenopausal (56.8%) and belonged to non-white ethnicity (70.3%). Postmenopausal women predominated in the CPS≥10 subgroup (74.2%) (Table 1). No significant differences in demographic characteristics and clinicopathological variables were observed based on PD-L1 subgroups, 117 patients (79.1%) had CPS < 10, with 91 (77.8%) being de novo stage IV metastatic disease. CD3+ (p=0.037), CD4+ (p=0.005) and CD8+ (p=0.001) TILs had higher expression in tumors with PD-L1 CPS≥10 (Table 2). According to the treatment received, almost half of the patients only received first-line chemotherapy (47%), as the following second line was applied to 28.8% of the total group. The third and fourth lines were administered in 12.9% and 9.1% of patients, respectively. Only 2 patients went through five palliative chemotherapy lines, and only one received up to 6 treatment lines. Between the subgroups CPS≥10 versus CPS < 10 no statistically significant differences were observed in the median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs. 5.0 months, p=0.89) and overall survival (OS) (8.7 vs. 8.8 months, p=0.6). Conclusion: This study offers insights into the expression patterns of PD-L1 and TILs subtypes in advanced TNBC cases in Brazil. PD-L1 CPS did not influence survival outcomes for this cohort of patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy only. The composition of TILs subtypes within the TME appears to vary based on PD-L1 CPS. Table 1. Advanced TNBC population characteristic by CPS (Nf148). Table 2. Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes characterization (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, CD68, CD 117, FOXP3 and PD-1) and its correlation with CPS status. Citation Format: Alexssandra Lima Siqueira dos Santos, Jesse Lopes da Silva, Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque, Antônio Lucas Araújo Neto, Cecília Ferreira da Silva, Luana Aguiar Mesquita Cerva, Isabele Ávila Small, Cicera Pimenta Marcelino, Paula de Mendonça Batista, Maria Aparecida do Carmo Rego, Maria Amélia Carlos Souto Maior Borba, Andreia Cristina de Melo. Unveiling the Landscape of PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Subtypes in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-16-07.

Interpretation of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: summary of a consensus meeting of Korean gastrointestinal pathologists.

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, and is currently indicated as a standard treatment. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is an important biomarker for predicting response to anti-programmed death 1/PD-L1 agents in several solid tumors, including gastric cancer. In the CheckMate-649 trial, significant clinical improvements were observed in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5, determined using the 28-8 pharmDx assay. Accordingly, an accurate interpretation of PD-L1 CPS, especially at a cutoff of 5, is important. The CPS method evaluates both immune and tumor cells and provides a comprehensive assessment of PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer. However, CPS evaluation has several limitations, one of which is poor interobserver concordance among pathologists. Despite these limitations, clinical indications relying on PD-L1 CPS are increasing. In response, Korean gastrointestinal pathologists held a consensus meeting for the interpretation of PD-L1 CPS in gastric cancer. Eleven pathologists reviewed 20 PD-L1 slides with a CPS cutoff close to 5, stained with the 28-8 pharmDx assay, and determined the consensus scores. The issues observed in discrepant cases were discussed. In this review, we present cases of gastric cancer with consensus PD-L1 CPS. In addition, we briefly touch upon current practices and clinical issues associated with assays used for the assessment of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer.

Effectiveness and tolerability of programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy for upper gastrointestinal tract cancers.

The combination of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and chemotherapy is approved as a standard first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer. However, it is unclear whether this combination is superior to chemotherapy alone. To assess the comparative effectiveness and tolerability of combining PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, or oesophageal carcinoma. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for studies that compared the efficacy and tolerance of PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer. We employed either random or fixed models to analyze the outcomes of each clinical trial, encompassing data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and adverse events (AEs). Nine phase 3 clinical trials (7016 advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer patients) met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the pooled PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group had a significantly longer OS than the chemotherapy-alone group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.81]; the pooled PFS result was consistent with that of OS (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.61-0.74). The count of patients achieving an objective response in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group surpassed that of the chemotherapy-alone group [odds ratio (OR) = 1.86, 95%CI: 1.59-2.18]. AE incidence was also higher in the combination-therapy group than in the chemotherapy-alone group, regardless of whether ≥ grade 3 only (OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.07-1.57) or all AE grades (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.39-2.54) were examined. We performed a subgroup analysis based on the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) and noted extended OS and PFS durations within the CPS ≥ 1, CPS ≥ 5, and CPS ≥ 10 subgroups of the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group. In contrast to chemotherapy alone, the combination of PD-1 inhibitor and chemotherapy appears to present a more favorable option for initial or subsequent treatment in patients with gastric cancer, GEJ tumor, or oesophageal cancer. This holds true particularly for individuals with PD-L1 CPS scores of ≥ 5 and ≥ 10.

18F-BMS-986229 PET to Assess Programmed-Death Ligand 1 Status in Gastroesophageal Cancer.

Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are the standard of care for advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Although recommendations and approval by regulatory agencies are often based on programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, pathologic assessments of PD-L1 status have several limitations. Single-site biopsies do not adequately capture disease heterogeneity within individual tumor lesions or among several lesions within the same patient, the PD-L1 combined positive score is a dynamic biomarker subject to evolution throughout a patient's disease course, and repeated biopsies are invasive and not always feasible. Methods: This was a prospective pilot study of the PD-L1-targeting radiotracer, 18F-BMS-986229, with PET imaging (PD-L1 PET) in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. Patients were administered the 18F-BMS-986229 radiotracer intravenously at a dose of 370 MBq over 1-2 min and underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging 60 min later. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of 18F-BMS-986229. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161781). Results: Between February 3, 2020, and February 2, 2022, 10 patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma underwent PD-L1 PET. There were no adverse events associated with the 18F-BMS-986229 tracer, and imaging did not result in treatment delays; the primary endpoint was achieved. Radiographic evaluation of PD-L1 expression was concordant with pathologic assessment in 88% of biopsied lesions, and 18F-BMS-986229 uptake on PET imaging correlated with pathologic evaluation by the combined positive score (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.64). Seventy-one percent of patients with 18F-BMS-986229 accumulation on PET imaging also had lesions without 18F-BMS-986229 uptake, highlighting the intrapatient heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression. Patients treated with frontline programmed death 1 inhibitors who had 18F-BMS-986229 accumulation in any lesions on PET imaging had longer progression-free survival than patients without tracer accumulation in any lesions (median progression-free survival, 28.4 vs. 9.9 mo), though the small sample size prevents any definitive conclusions. Conclusion: PD-L1 PET imaging was safe, feasible, and concordant with pathologic evaluation and offers a potential noninvasive tool to assess PD-L1 expression.

HER2 and PD-L1 Expression in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Insights for Combinatorial Targeting Approaches.

Gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (GA/GEJA) are associated with a poor prognosis, primarily due to late disease diagnosis. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression are important biomarkers for treatment selection in locally advanced unresectable and metastatic GA/GEJA, and there is increasing interest in their role in earlier stages of disease. In this study, we aimed to evaluate HER2 and PD-L1 expression in a curative-intent GA/GEJA cohort to describe their expression patterns and analyze the association between HER2 expression and clinicopathological features. HER2 expression was evaluated in surgical and endoscopic submucosal dissection tumor samples, and PD-L1 was evaluated in HER2-positive cases. The clinical cohort included 107 patients, with 8.4% testing positive for HER2 (seven of whom also exhibited a PD-L1 combined positive score of ≥1. HER2 status was not significantly associated with survival outcomes. A pathologist-guided, region-specific analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression rarely overlaps with HER2-positive tumor areas. While the therapeutic implications of these observations remain unknown, these findings suggest that combination strategies targeting HER2 and PD-L1 might be directed toward distinct tumor subclones. The herein disclosed region-specific biomarker expression patterns may have important therapeutic and prognostic impacts, warranting further evaluation.

An artificial intelligence-powered PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) analyser in urothelial carcinoma alleviating interobserver and intersite variability.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have shown promising clinical outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). The combined positive score (CPS) quantifies PD-L1 22C3 expression in UC, but it can vary between pathologists due to the consideration of both immune and tumour cell positivity. An artificial intelligence (AI)-powered PD-L1 CPS analyser was developed using 1,275,907 cells and 6175.42 mm2 of tissue annotated by pathologists, extracted from 400 PD-L1 22C3-stained whole slide images of UC. We validated the AI model on 543 UC PD-L1 22C3 cases collected from three institutions. There were 446 cases (82.1%) where the CPS results (CPS ≥10 or <10) were in complete agreement between three pathologists, and 486 cases (89.5%) where the AI-powered CPS results matched the consensus of two or more pathologists. In the pathologist's assessment of the CPS, statistically significant differences were noted depending on the source hospital (P = 0.003). Three pathologists reevaluated discrepancy cases with AI-powered CPS results. After using the AI as a guide and revising, the complete agreement increased to 93.9%. The AI model contributed to improving the concordance between pathologists across various factors including hospital, specimen type, pathologic T stage, histologic subtypes, and dominant PD-L1-positive cell type. In the revised results, the evaluation discordance among slides from different hospitals was mitigated. This study suggests that AI models can help pathologists to reduce discrepancies between pathologists in quantifying immunohistochemistry including PD-L1 22C3 CPS, especially when evaluating data from different institutions, such as in a telepathology setting.

Whole-transcriptome sequencing in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer: A deep dive into its clinical potential.

Advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GC/GEJCs) harbor diverse molecular signatures, highlighting the need for intricate evaluations to identify potential therapeutic targets. Although whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS) has emerged as a useful tool for understanding these molecular intricacies, its clinical implications have yet to be fully elucidated. This study evaluated the correlation between immunohistochemistry (IHC) and WTS, compared their clinical significance, and identified potential therapeutic targets undetectable through IHC alone. We enrolled 140 patients with advanced GC/GEJC and assessed them using IHC for six pivotal biomarkers: claudin-18 (CLDN18), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Concurrently, WTS was employed as part of the analyses in MONSTAR-SCREEN-2, a multicenter multiomics study. IHC analysis revealed 16.4% HER2, 39.3% CLDN18 (2+/3 + ≥75%), and 15.8% PD-L1 (combined positive score ≥ 10) positivity, among other molecular markers. Significant correlations were observed between IHC and WTS for all six pivotal biomarkers. Among nineteen HER2 IHC-positive patients treated with anti-HER2 therapeutics, ERBB2 status in WTS was significantly associated with progression-free survival (ERBB2-high vs. -low: median 9.0 vs. 5.6 months, log-rank p = 0.046). IHC-based molecular profiling revealed significantly high expression of CLDN18 in RTK-negative patients, with 78.4% positive for either CLDN18 or PD-L1. Additionally, WTS revealed elevated expression of pivotal biomarkers in patients displaying negative targetable biomarkers via IHC. Our findings highlighted the significant correlation between IHC and WTS, reinforcing the clinical utility of WTS. A subset with IHC-negative but WTS-positive status may benefit from specific biomarker-targeted therapies.

First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): CheckMate 649 Chinese subgroup analysis 4-year (yr) follow-up.

318 Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) and an acceptable safety profile vs chemo in previously untreated Chinese pts from CheckMate 649, consistent with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. 1L NIVO + chemo is approved for advanced GC/GEJC/EAC in multiple countries, including China. We report 4-yr results of NIVO + chemo vs chemo in Chinese pts from CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced or metastatic, non-HER2+ GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 208 Chinese pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At 49-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and in all randomized pts (Table). The 4-yr OS rate was 25% with NIVO + chemo vs 11% with chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and 21% vs 9% in all randomized pts. Objective response rate (ORR; 95% CI) per BICR in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 who had measurable lesions at baseline was 68% (56–79) with NIVO + chemo vs 48% (36–60) with chemo; corresponding ORR in all randomized pts was 66% (55–76) and 45% (35–56). Responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo both in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (median duration of response [mDOR; 95% CI] 12.5 mo [7.2–23.4] vs 6.9 mo [3.9–8.5]) and in all randomized pts (mDOR [95% CI] 12.5 mo [7.2–17.7] vs 5.6 mo [4.4–8.3]). No new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusions: After 4 yrs of follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful survival benefit and more durable responses vs chemo in Chinese pts, with an acceptable safety profile. These results are consistent with previous reports and with the overall study population with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC and further support NIVO + chemo as a standard 1L treatment option for Chinese pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116 . [Table: see text]

Nivolumab (NIVO) + chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer/esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): 4 year (yr) follow-up of CheckMate 649.

306 Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs chemo and an acceptable safety profile in previously untreated, advanced non-HER2+ GC/GEJC/EAC, leading to approvals in many countries. NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy at 2 and 3-yr follow-ups. We present 4-yr follow-up results for NIVO + chemo vs chemo from CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. HER2+ patients (pts) were excluded. Randomized pts received NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Dual primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 1581 pts were randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. At the 48-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts (Table) OS benefit with NIVO + chemo was observed in most prespecified subgroups. Objective response rates (ORR) were higher and responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts (Table). In the exploratory analysis of OS by response at the 18-week landmark timepoint, there were numerically more pts achieving response with NIVO + chemo vs chemo, and median OS (95% CI) with NIVO + chemo was numerically longer in responders vs non-responders both in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (20.5 [17.5–25.0] vs 14.0 [11.6–15.7]) and all randomized pts (19.4 [17.5–21.7] vs 13.1 [11.6–14.4]). No new safety signals were identified, consistent with the 3-yr follow-up. Conclusions: NIVO + chemo is the first PD-1 inhibitor/chemo combination to demonstrate long-term efficacy and acceptable safety after 4 yrs of follow up in previously untreated advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. These results are consistent with earlier follow-ups, further supporting NIVO + chemo as a standard 1L treatment in these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116 .[Table: see text]

Reconstruction of unreported subgroup survival data with PD-L1-low expression in advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using innovative KMSubtraction workflow

BackgroundAmong patients with advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with high/positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, a superior survival outcome has been demonstrated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, it remains...

Evaluation of immune density, PD-L1, and CXCR4 expressions in metaplastic breast carcinoma to predict potential immunotherapy benefit.

Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) -rare but fatal subtype of invasive breast carcinomas- provides limited benefit from conventional triple-negative breast carcinoma chemotherapy. We aimed to determine the immune density of this tumor and to evaluate of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) expressions to determine whether it would benefit from immunotherapy. Clinicopathological characteristics of 85 patients diagnosed as MBC between 1997 and 2017 were retrospectively assessed. We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1 and CXCR4, and the extent of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), with survival data. TILs groups were statistically significantly associated with lymph node status, histological subtype, squamous component, local recurrence and/or systemic metastasis, and disease-related deaths (p < 0.05). PD-L1 positivity in immune cells (ICs) has a statistically significant relationship with the presence of squamous component (p = 0.011) and HER2 positivity (p = 0.031). PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells (TCs) was found to be significantly more frequent in high-TILs density (p = 0.003). PD-L1 combined positive score was significantly associated with the tumors containing high-TILs density (p = 0.012) and squamous component (p = 0.035). Disease-free and disease-specific survival rates were found to be longer for the cases displaying PD-L1 positivity in ICs; and also PD-L1 positivity in ICs was found to be an independent prognostic factor. When the expression of CXCR4 was compared with clinicopathological and survival parameters, no statistically significant association was found (p > 0.05). Based on the results of this retrospective study, PD-L1 and TILs appear to be prognostic. This study provides rationale for further studies to determine whether a subset of patients with metaplastic breast cancer could derive a meaningful benefit from immune-targeting therapies.

Reproducibility and usefulness of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for predicting program death-ligand 1 expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BackgroundAccurate assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) before immunotherapy is crucial. We aimed to explore the reproducibility and usefulness of the quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements for predicting PD-L1expression status in NPC.MethodsWe retrospectively recruited 134 NPC patients who underwent MRI scans and PD-L1 detection. A PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 was identified as high expression status. Patients were divide into two cohorts based on the MRI scanning devices, including a 1.5-T MRI cohort (n = 85, 44 PD-L1 high expression) and a 3.0-T MRI cohort (n = 49, 24 PD-L1 high expression). The mean ADC (ADCmean), minimum ADC (ADCmin) and maximal ADC (ADCmax) values were independently measured by two observers. The ADC measurement reproducibility was assessed by interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The correlations between ADC parameters and CPS were analyzed by spearman’s correlation coefficient (r), and the performance for PD-L1expression status prediction was assessed by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsThe measurement reproducibility of ADCmean, ADCmin and ADCmax was good in the 1.5-T MRI cohort (ICC: 0.843–0.930) and 3.0-T MRI cohort (ICC: 0.929–0.960). The ADCmean, ADCmin, and ADCmax tended to inversely correlate with the CPS (r:-0.37 - -0.52 in the 1.5-T MRI cohort, and − 0.52 - -0.60 in the 3.0-T MRI cohort; P all < 0.01). The ADCmean, ADCmin and ADCmax yielded the AUC of 0.756 (95% CI: 0.651, 0.861), 0.689 (95% CI: 0.576, 0.802), and 0.733 (95%CI: 0.626, 0.839) in the 1.5-T MRI cohort and 0.820 (95%CI: 0.703, 0.937), 0.755 (95% CI: 0.616, 0.894), and 0.760 (95%CI: 0.627, 0.893) in the 3.0-T MRI cohort for predicting PD-L1 high expression status, respectively.ConclusionADC measurements may act as a reproducible and feasible method to predict PD-L1 expression status in NPC.

Impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity on clinical and molecular features of patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an important screening biomarker to select patients with gastric cancer (GC) for optimized treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, patients with metastatic GC with available PD-L1 results between October 2019 and September 2021 were identified by reviewing their electronic medical records. Genomic data were obtained from the Samsung Medical Center Clinical Sequencing Platform. Among the 399 patients, 276 (69%) had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1, 155 (39%) had a CPS between 1 and 5, and 121 (30%) had a CPS ≥5. Of the 121 patients with CPS ≥5, 28 (23%) had a known etiology for "inflamed tumor," with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity (N = 11) or high tumor mutational burden (TMB) (N = 17), which included microsatellite instability (MSI) (N = 9). PD-L1 CPS ≥5 was observed in 11/11 (100%) patients with EBV positivity, 9/12 (75%) patients with MSI, and 17/33 (52%) patients with high TMB. For the 108 patients who received ICI therapy, CPS ≥5 was the only predictor significantly associated with survival in multivariable analyses, including TMB, MSI, or EBV. Objective response rate (ORR) was 49% in patients with CPS ≥5, 30% in patients with 1 ≤ CPS <5, and 19% in patients with CPS <1. Among the 31 responders to ICI therapy, 27 (87%) had a CPS of ≥1. Mutations in TET2, IRS2, DOT1L, PTPRT, and LRP1B were associated with a higher ORR (63%-100%), whereas MDC1 mutations were associated with a low ORR (22%). PD-L1 expression is an independent and sensitive biomarker for ICI therapy. Considering its significant association with several gene alterations, including PIK3CA mutations and MET amplification, combining ICI therapy with other targeted agents may be a promising therapeutic strategy for GC.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab in combination with radiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BackgroundThe combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has been approved for the treatment of multiple solid tumors. This was a phase I study investigating definitive radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with nivolumab and ipilimumab...

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in primary gastric adenocarcinoma and matched metastases

BackgroundCombination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy is recommended for first line treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) patients with locally advanced unresectable disease or metastatic disease. However, data regarding the concordance rate between PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) in primary GC and matched regional lymph node metastasis (LNmet) or matched distant metastasis (Dmet) is limited.MethodsTissue microarray sections from primary resected GC, LNmet and Dmet were immunohistochemically stained with anti-PD-L1 (clone SP263). PD-L1 expression was scored separately in tumour cells and immune cells and compared between matched primary GC, LNmet and/or Dmet. CPS was calculated and results for CPS cut-offs 1 and 5 were compared between matched samples.Results275 PD-L1 stained GC were analysed. 189 primary GC had matched LNmet. CPS cut-off 1 concordance rate between primary GC and LNmet was 77%. 23 primary GC had matched Dmet but no matched LNmet, CPS cut-off 1 concordance rate was 70%. 63 primary GC had both matched LNmet and matched Dmet, CPS cut-off 1 concordance rate of 67%. CPS cut-off 5 results were similar. The proportion of PD-L1 positive tumour cells increased from primary GC (26%) to LNmet (42%) and was highest in Dmet (75%).ConclusionOur study showed up to 33% discordance of PD-L1 CPS between primary GC and LNmet and/or Dmet suggesting that multiple biopsies of primary GC and metastatic sites might need to be tested before considering treatment options. Moreover, this is the first study that seems to suggest that tumour cells acquire PD-L1 expression during disease progression.

Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 Expression in Gastric Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis.

Recently, many studies have explored the relationship between the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and prognosis in gastric cancer, but there is still controversy. Additionally, few studies have specifically investigated the expression of PD-L1 in patients with peritoneal metastasis. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of PD-L1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. The combined positive score (CPS) was calculated to evaluate the expression of PD-L1, and the clinicopathological data were analyzed to explore prognostic significance. In total, 147 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. The negative PD-L1 expression was defined as a CPS < 1, and high PD-L1 expression was defined as a CPS ≥ 10. PD-L1 expression with CPS ≥ 1 and CPS-negative was detected in 67 (45.58%) and 80 (54.42%) patients, respectively. High PD-L1 expression at PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 was detected in 21(14.29%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.53 months in the CPS < 10 group and 27.00 months in the CPS ≥ 10 group; the OS difference between the two groups was significant (p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) (p = 0.002) and severe peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.033) were significantly associated with poor survival, while palliative chemotherapy (p = 0.002) and high PD-L1 expression (p = 0.008) were independent and significantly favorable prognostic factors. Our study demonstrated that PD-L1 expression was widely presented in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, while a CPS no less than 10 predicted better prognosis.

PIK3CA mutation subtype delineates distinct immune profiles in gastric carcinoma.

PIK3CA mutations in cancer regulate tumour immunogenicity. Given that PIK3CA mutation subtypes influence therapeutic responses to AKT inhibitor and that H1047R mutation confers selective growth advantages after immunotherapy, we hypothesised that immune phenotypes may depend on PIK3CA mutation subtypes. We investigated 133 gastric cancers (GCs) harbouring PIK3CA mutation [21 E542K (15.8%), 36 E545X (27.1%), 26 H1047X (19.5%), and 46 others (34.6%)].Four patients (3.0%) had a combination of mutations (E542K + E545K in 3 patients and E545K + H1047R in 1 patient). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status, PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) combined positive score (CPS), and stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed. Concurrent genomic alterations, GeoMx digital spatial profiling (DSP), and OPAL multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) were analysed, and correlation between the two assays was investigated. Of the 133 PIK3CA-mutant (PIK3CAm ) GCs, MSI-high GC was significantly frequent in the H1047X mutation subtype (p = 0.005), while EBV positivity did not affect the mutation subtypes. There was no significant survival difference between the E542K, E545X, and H1047X subgroups. However, in the subgroup analysis for EBV-positive GC, H1047Xm GC showed a trend towards shorter survival than E542K and E545Xm GC (p = 0.090 and 0.062). With DSP analysis, H1047Xm GC showed elevated VISTA (p = 0.0003), granzyme B (p < 0.0001), CD4 (p = 0.0001), and CD45 (p < 0.0001) expression compared with the E542Km or E545Xm GC subgroups, and only VISTA expression remained significant (p < 0.0001) using OPAL mIHC. DSP and OPAL analyses showed a moderate correlation of CD4 (ρ = 0.42, p = 0.004) and CD8 (ρ = 0.62, p < 0.001) expression levels in a comparison of six antibodies. Immune-related protein expression levels were evident when classified by the three PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and H1047Xm GC showed the highest immune-related protein expression compared with E542Km or E545Xm GC. Our results demonstrated distinct immune profiles in GC with PIK3CA hotspot mutations using GeoMx DSP and OPAL mIHC, and there was a correlation between the two multiplex platforms. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Interobserver Agreement on the Interpretation of Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) Among Gynecologic Pathologists.

The anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab is approved for the treatment of cervical carcinoma with a programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Combined Positive Score (CPS) of ≥1. We assessed interobserver agreement in cervical carcinoma PD-L1 CPS to identify whether it may affect patient selection for immunotherapeutic candidacy. Twenty-nine cervical carcinomas were stained for PD-L1 (Dako 22C3), and slides were interpreted by 5 subspecialty-trained gynecologic pathologists with experience reading PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. Expression was scored using CPS and read out as positive (≥1) or negative (<1); in positive cases, a final score was assigned (1 to 100). There was consensus agreement across all 5 pathologists for 90% (26/29) (Fleiss Kappa value for interobserver agreement: 0.799). The 3 cases with disagreement were composed of 2 squamous cell carcinomas and 1 small cell carcinoma. Of the 26 with unanimous agreement, 88% (23/26) were positive and 12% (3/26) were negative. All (16/16) pure squamous cell carcinomas with full consensus were interpreted as positive, whereas tumors with glandular components were commonly consensus negative (33%, 3/9); this difference was significant ( P =0.037). Disagreements were attributable to low CPS versus negative reads (2 cases) and difficulty discerning glandular involvement from pushing invasion (1 case). In summary, experienced gynecologic pathologists showed substantial interobserver agreement in the interpretation of PD-L1 CPS at the Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment threshold, with the majority of tumors being classified as positive. Pure squamous histology was strongly associated with a consensus-positive read, whereas a subset of tumors with glandular differentiation was negative by all readers. Disagreements occurred in tumors with low versus negative CPS values and in the setting of limited invasion.

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer/esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): 3-year follow-up from CheckMate 649.

4025 Background: NIVO + chemo demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs chemo and acceptable safety in previously untreated patients (pts) with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC, leading to approvals in multiple countries including the US. NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy after 2 years of follow-up. We present efficacy and safety analyses from NIVO + chemo vs chemo from the 3-year follow-up of CheckMate 649. Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable advanced, or metastatic GC/GEJC/EAC were enrolled, regardless of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, excluding pts with known HER2-positive status. Pts were randomized to NIVO (360 mg Q3W or 240 mg Q2W) + chemo (XELOX Q3W or FOLFOX Q2W), NIVO + ipilimumab, or chemo. Primary endpoints for NIVO + chemo vs chemo were OS and PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) in pts with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 5. Results: 1581 pts were concurrently randomized to NIVO + chemo or chemo. With 36-month (mo) minimum follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate OS and PFS benefit vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and all randomized pts. The objective response rate (ORR) per BICR in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 who had measurable lesions at baseline was 60% (95% CI 55–65) with NIVO + chemo vs 45% (95% CI 40–50) with chemo; in all randomized pts, ORR per BICR was 58% (95% CI 54–62) with NIVO + chemo vs 46% (95% CI 42–50) with chemo. Responses were more durable with NIVO + chemo vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 (median [m] duration of response [mDOR] 9.6 mo [95% CI 8.2–12.4] vs 7.0 mo [95% CI 5.6–7.9], respectively) and in all randomized pts (mDOR 8.5 mo [95% CI 7.7–9.9] vs 6.9 mo [95% CI 5.8–7.2], respectively). OS benefit with NIVO + chemo was observed across most prespecified subgroups. No new safety signals were identified. A summary of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) is shown in the Table. Additional analyses will be presented. Conclusions: After 3 years of follow-up, NIVO + chemo continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful long-term survival benefit with acceptable safety, further supporting its use as a standard 1L treatment in previously untreated pts with advanced GC/GEJC/EAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02872116 . [Table: see text]

Effect of an artificial intelligence–powered programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score analyzer in urothelial cancer on inter-observer and inter-site variability.

e13546 Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a predictive marker for immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment response in urothelial carcinoma (UC). The combined positive score (CPS) is a representative method to evaluate the expression level of PD-L1 in UC. However, inter-observer and inter-institute variations can disrupt accurate CPS evaluation. The purpose of this study is to assess the role of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered PD-L1 CPS analyzer on UC in reducing inter-observer and inter-institute variability. Methods: Lunit SCOPE PD-L1 CPS was developed with 4.94 x 105 tumor cells and 4.17 x 105 immune cells from 360 PD-L1 stained whole-slide images (WSIs) of UC from multiple institutions. The algorithm consisted of tissue area segmentation and cell detection AI models. The AI models calculated the CPS by detecting tumor cells over the tumor area and immune cells over the tumor and adjacent area. Three uropathologists from different university hospitals evaluated the CPS classification (≥10 or &lt;10) of 543 PD-L1 stained WSIs of UC from each hospital. The result with concordant CPS classification of each slide across ≥ 2 pathologists was considered the consensus. Each pathologist revisited to evaluate WSIs by referencing the AI model inference, after a washout period, if there was a discrepancy between the pathologist and the AI model. Results: Of 543 WSIs, 446 (82.1%) were classified as the same CPS subgroup by all three uropathologists. Also, pathologists had a high degree of concordance with the consensus in WSIs from their own hospitals. They re-evaluated 64, 73, and 75 WSIs with AI assistance, respectively, and changed the CPS classification for 47, 48, and 48 WSIs. After re-evaluation with AI assistance, three uropathologists agreed on the same CPS classification in 510 WSIs (93.9%). The overall percentage agreement (OPA) of each pathologist with the consensus increased from 95.0%, 94.8%, and 92.3% to 98.7%, 98.3%, and 96.9% after AI assistance, and the OPA for WSIs of other institutions increased more compared to the OPA for WSIs of their own hospital. Conclusions: This study shows that an AI-powered PD-L1 CPS analyzer in UC can reduce inter-observer and inter-site variability. This result suggests that the AI model will help evaluate CPS in UC more accurately and reduce variation in situations where pathologists analyze WSIs from unfamiliar institutions.[Table: see text]