ABSTRACT Background Impairments in reading comprehension impact participation in daily activities for persons with aphasia. Home practice programs can be used by speech-language pathologists to extend treatment by providing additional practice to support recovery. However, adherence to home programs is often low and factors that enhance adherence to home programs are poorly understood. Aims We sought to examine if using self-monitoring practice with an aphasia-friendly logbook and a timer is an effective mechanism to support home program adherence and to explore the perception of this technique by individuals with aphasia. Methods & procedures This non-concurrent multiple baseline single case experimental design was completed during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Procedures were completed virtually or in person. If in person, assessments were done in the clinic or in the participant’s home. The participants (n = 6) were at least six months post-stroke, diagnosed with aphasia, and reported interest in practicing reading. There were five males and one female. During the baseline phase, participants received training on a mobile reading comprehension application on an iPad. They were instructed to practice reading 80 minutes seven days a week, and were not provided with self-monitoring supports, but were given a single cue card that indicated the practice expectation. The number of data points in the baseline phase was at least five and increased across participants. At the end of baseline, participants received training on the use of a timer and an aphasia-friendly logbook for self-monitoring minutes of practice. They were instructed to continue practicing for 80 minutes every day. In both phases, participants received weekly check-ins to ensure the technology was working. Outcomes & results The primary outcome measures were minutes of practice and percent adherence. Three out of the six participants demonstrated an effect with the self-monitoring intervention with more minutes of practice or greater percent adherence during the intervention phase. Responders typically had higher self-efficacy for exercise scores and a shorter baseline phase. Three participants did not demonstrate an effect of the self-monitoring intervention. The logbook was reported as one of the two most helpful features of the intervention by all the participants with weekly technology check-ins and iPad training as the least helpful elements. Conclusions Self-monitoring with an aphasia-friendly logbook and timer can support some individuals with aphasia in achieving a greater amount of home program practice. Additional research with a larger more diverse sample that incorporates timing and self-efficacy for exercise is warranted.