Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a widely used tool for risk stratification and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. In amyloid patients, cardiac amyloid deposits are associated with poor prognosis, increased risk for arrhythmias, sudden death, and subsequent exercise limitation due to restrictive cardiomyopathy. The type of amyloidosis and its affectation of the heart are different, and little is known about the CPET parameters according to the type of cardiac amyloidosis. Purpose In this study, we aim to compare CPET data in different types of amyloidosis to determine if CPET variables evaluated could have a significant difference that could impact the follow-up or prognosis of the patients based on the type of amyloidosis. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 194 patients with a diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis referred for CPET from February 2010 to February 2024. Patients with at least one CPET data were included in our analysis. The type of amyloidosis, comorbidities, and echocardiogram data were retrieved from medical records. Patients were divided into 3 different groups according to the type of amyloidosis: AL Amyloidosis(AL), Variant TTR Amyloidosis (vTRR), and Wild Type TTR Amyloidosis (wtTTR). Individuals with CPET studies after heart transplant were excluded from the analysis. Fisher’s exact test or chi-square was used to compare categorical variables. ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer (TK) were used to compare continuous variables. Adjustment using General Linear Models (GLM) procedure was used to identify any confounder that could affect the results. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Out of the 194 patients, 66 had AL Amyloidosis, 40 had vTTR Amyloidosis, and 88 had wtTTR Amyloidosis. Most of the patients were male, and the male predominance was higher in the wtTRR group. There were 41 (62.1%) males in the AL group, 35 (87.5%) in the vTRR group, and 83 (94.3%) in the wtTTR group (p<0.0001). Comorbidities were balanced among the groups. Additional demographic and comorbidities data are shown in Table 1. From the evaluated CPET variables, VE/VCO2 nadir and slope were significantly higher in the wtTTR group when compared to the other groups, as well as Peak VE and Peak TV(Figure A). However, after adjusting for sex, BMI, and age, VE/VCO2 nadir was still significantly higher in the wtTRR group (p=0.003) compared to the other groups, as well as Peak VE, which was higher again in vTTR patients (p=0.001), and Peak TV (Table 2). Conclusion Ventilation variables evaluated in CPET showed alterations in the wtTTR group. These findings suggest that wtTRR amyloid patients could have a severe problem in ventilation that could be of significant relevance in future prognosis.