Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Research Articles

Benefit from luteal phase progestin-primed ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate supplementation in young women with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective study.

To compare the pregnant outcomes of luteal phase progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with clomiphene citrate supplementation (LPPOS+CC) and follicular phase PPOS+CC protocol (FPPOS+CC) in young women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). A total of 483 women aged ≤35 years with DOR, who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/embryo transfer (ET) with controlled ovarian stimulation using LPPOS+CC (n=257) or FPPOS+CC (n=226) protocols during June 2018 and December 2021 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, were included in this retrospective study. The baseline characteristics, ovarian stimulation, endocrinological indicators, clinical outcomes between the two groups, and pregnancy outcomes of women achieved at least one high-quality cleavage-stage embryo or good-morphology blastocyst between the two groups were compared. No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with respect to number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation rate, high-quality cleavage-stage embryo cycle rate, the percentage of women with profound pituitary suppression, preterm birth rate, and live birth rate (P>0.05). Compared to FPPOS+CC group, the duration of stimulation [11.0 (9.0,12.0) vs. 9.0 (8.0,11.0) d, P<0.01] was significantly longer in the LPPOS+CC group. The LH levels on the day of trigger [4.0 (2.7,5.3) vs. 5.1 (3.2,7.2) IU/L, P<0.01], the percentage of women with LH levels of >10 IU/L on the trigger day (3.13% vs. 10.67%, P<0.01), and the two pronucleate (2PN) rate of ICSI oocytes (72.16% vs. 79.56%, P<0.05) were significantly lower in the LPPOS+CC group than those in the FPPOS+CC group. The consumption of total gonadotropin [2213 (1650,2700) vs. 2000 (1575,2325) IU, P<0.01], the progesterone levels on the day of trigger [1.3 (0.8,2.9) vs. 0.9 (0.6,1.2) ng/mL, P<0.01], the clinical pregnancy rate [61.88% vs. 46.84%, P<0.01], and implantation rate [42.20% vs. 31.07%, P<0.01] in the LPPOS+CC group were significantly higher than those in the FPPOS+CC group. Compared to FPPOS+CC, the LPPOS+CC protocol appears to have better pregnancy outcomes for young women with DOR undergoing IVF-ICSI-ET.

The comparision among euploidy of preimplantation blastocysts in different controlled ovary stimulation (COH) protocols.

To compare differences in euploidy rates for blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long and short protocols, GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and mild stimulation protocols, and other ovary stimulation protocols. This was a retrospective cohort study from the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Department of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. A total of 1657 PGT-A cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after different controlled ovary hyperstimulation protocols were analyzed, and a total of 3154 embryos were biopsied. Differences in euploidy rate per embryo biopsied, embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved and cycle cancellation rate were compared. For the PGT-A cycles, the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was lower in the GnRH-ant protocol than in the GnRH-a long protocol (53.26 vs. 58.68%, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied (β = -0.079, p = 0.011). The euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was not affected by total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. The embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was similar in all protocols and was negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (β = -0.003, p = 0.003). Compared with the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied. The total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved did not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates.

Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed vs. antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients with poor ovarian response: a retrospective study

Objectives Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is an efficient controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) method. The study explored the pregnancy outcomes between PPOS and antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol (GnRH-ant) in infertile patients with poor ovarian response (POR). Methods This retrospective study included patients with POR who underwent COS at the Reproductive Medical Center of Shanxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2021 to April 2022. The cycles were grouped as the GnRH-ant group and the PPOS group. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate; the secondary outcomes included the biochemical pregnancy abortion rate and live birth rate. Results Frozen embryo transfer was used in all cycles in this study. The cycles were divided into the GnRH-ant (n = 236 cycles) and PPOS (n = 273 cycles) groups. Age, BMI, type of infertility, infertility duration, FSH, LH, PRL, E2, T, P, and the number of cycles in the hospital were similar between the two groups (all p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in the clinical pregnancy rate (primary outcome, 32.71% vs. 43.90%, p = 0.082), total Gn dose, total Gn days, ART mode (IVF or ICSI), AFC, MII follicles, 2PN embryos, fertility, cycle cancelation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, or live birth rate between the two groups (all p > 0.05). The PPOS group exhibited a higher rate of high-quality embryos than the GnRH-ant group (50.12% vs. 42.90%, p = 0.045). Conclusions The PPOS protocol was comparable to the GnRH-ant protocol regarding induction parameters and cycle cancelation, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and abortion rates but might be associated with a higher proportion of high-quality embryos.

Effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate dose in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation on pregnancy outcomes in poor ovarian response patients with different body mass index levels.

For the poor ovarian response (POR) population, the relationship between medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) dose in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and clinical outcome is still unclear. This study aims to explore the effect of MPA dose in PPOS on clinical outcomes in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients with different body mass index (BMI) levels, hoping to provide clinical doctors with better options for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) programs. This is a retrospective analysis of 253 oocyte retrieval cycles of POSEIDON group 3 and 4 patients who underwent PPOS protocol in IVF/ICSI treatment at the Reproductive Medical Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from March 2019 to April 2022. The effects of different MPA doses (8 mg/d or 10 mg/d) on pregnancy outcomes were compared in normal BMI (18.5-24 kg/m2) and high BMI (≥24 kg/m2) patients, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting pregnancy outcomes. For normal BMI patients, the 8-mg/d MPA group had a higher embryo implantation rate (33.78% vs. 18.97%, P = 0.012). For high BMI patients, the 10-mg/d MPA group had a higher HCG positive rate (55.00% vs. 25.00%, P = 0.028), clinical pregnancy rate (50.00% vs. 20.00%, P = 0.025), and cumulative pregnancy rate (37.74% vs. 13.79%, P = 0.023) compared with the 8-mg/d MPA group. There was no significant difference in cumulative live birth rate between the 8-mg/d and 10-mg/d MPA groups in patients with normal or high BMI. The results of multivariate logistic regression showed a significant correlation between MPA dose and cumulative pregnancy in the high BMI population (OR = 0.199, 95% CI: 0.046~0.861, P = 0.031). For POR patients with high BMI, 10 mg/d of MPA in the PPOS protocol had a higher cumulative pregnancy rate than 8 mg/d of MPA, but it had no significant effect on the cumulative live birth rate.

Comparison of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation regimen and antagonist regimen in women aged 35 years or older with diminished ovarian reserve: A propensity score-matched study.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) has been a major challenge in infertility treatment. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) regimen and antagonist regimen in infertile patients aged 35 years or older with DOR. A retrospective study of 289 invitro fertilization (IVF) cycles from April 2016 to June 2022 was performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups at a ratio of 1:1. After matching, there were 87 cycles in the PPOS group and 87 cycles in the antagonist group. The primary outcome measures included the incidence of premature LH surge, the number of retrieved oocytes, and the number of mature oocytes, which were comparable between the two groups (all P values >0.05). There were no significant differences in laboratory indicators and final clinical outcomes between the two groups (all P values >0.05). For DOR patients aged 35 years or older, the number of retrieved oocytes and the number of mature oocytes were comparable between the PPOS and antagonist groups. Moreover, the two regimens showed no difference in the inhibition of premature LH surge.

Experience in using biosimilars in IVF programs with donor oocytes in protocols with micronized progesterone

Relevance: Stimulation of oocyte donors' superovulation occupies a key place in the development of general assisted reproduction technology (ART). Oocyte donation programs involve young and healthy women undergoing severe ovarian stimulation protocols to obtain good-quality oocytes. Advances in recombinant DNA technology led to the development of recombinant follitropin alfa.The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the biosimilar folitropin alfa in the superovulation stimulation cycles of oocyte donors in comparison with the original medication in Progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols.Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study included 25 oocyte donors who underwent superovulation induction. The first group consisted of 25 oocyte donors in whom superovulation was stimulated with a bio-analogue of follitropin alfa. The second group (control) included the same 25 oocyte donors stimulated with the original rFSH medication. The donors of the leading group were stimulated with biosimilar recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin. For the control group, a protocol was used using the original drug rFSH and CHMG in the same doses. The obtained donor oocytes were fertilized with ICSI or frozen. The program's result was determined by taking a blood test for b-hCG 14 days after embryo transfer.Results: The number of mature oocytes in the study groups did not differ significantly, amounting to 20.6 ± 1.1 in group 1 and 21.2 ± 1.3 in group 2. The average number of fertilized oocytes in group 1 was 5.6 ± 0.8, and in group 2 – 6.1 ± 1.1; thus, the fertilization rate in the two groups did not differ (67,5% in group 1 vs 79,2% in group 2, р&gt; 0,05). The blastulation rate (49.1% in group 1 and 52.2% in group 2) did not differ significantly in both the biosimilar group and the original medication. The Top Quality Blastocysts in Group 1 were 1.5 ± 0.7 (55%) vs 1.8 ± 0.5 (48%) in Group 2. At the same time, the level of NNB in both groups also had no statistically significant differences.Conclusion: Sinnal-F was not inferior to the original medication in terms of the proportion of mature oocytes in oocyte donors. The study's results confirm that Synnal-f demonstrates favorable and comparable efficacy to the original medication in oocyte maturation in IVF/ICSI cycles.

"Trends in Plasma Kisspeptin Level and Cellular Experiment Insights During Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology"

"Trends in Plasma Kisspeptin Level and Cellular Experiment Insights During Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology"

Comparing blastocyst euploid rates between the progestin-primed and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols in aneuploidy genetic testing: a randomised trial protocol

IntroductionProgestin can inhibit the pituitary luteinising hormone (LH) surge during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH...

Letrozole cotreatment progestin-primed ovarian stimulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

To investigate the impact of letrozole cotreatment progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) (Le PPOS) in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and the pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 2575 cycles were included (1675 in the Le PPOS group and 900 in the PPOS group). The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome was the live birth rates. In this study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to create a perfect match of 379 patients in each group. After matching, the numbers of oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, fertilization, and clinical pregnancy rates were more favorable in the Le PPOS group than in the PPOS group (all p < 0.05). The multivariable analysis showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the Le PPOS than in the PPOS group (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.04, p = 0.024) after adjusting for potentially confounding factors (age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicular count, the type of embryo transferred, number of transferred embryos, body mass index, and follicular stimulating hormone and estradiol levels on starting day). This retrospective study with a limited sample size suggests that the Le PPOS protocol might be an alternative to the PPOS protocol in women undergoing COS and could lead to better pregnancy outcomes. The results should be confirmed using a formal randomized controlled trial.

Cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization cycle via progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve: an open-label, randomized controlled trial

This study aimed to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve (NOR). Infertile women with NOR who underwent their first IVF cycle were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a freeze-all strategy with delayed embryo transfer (PPOS group, n = 174) and fresh embryo transfer first (GnRH-ant group, n = 174). The primary outcome was the cLBR per aspiration. The cLBR between the PPOS group and GnRH-ant group were comparable (55.75% vs. 52.87%, p = 0.591). A premature luteinizing hormone surge was not observed in the PPOS group, while there were six cases (3.45%) in the GnRH-ant group, but no premature ovulation in either of the groups. The pregnancy outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate, were all comparable. In addition, the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and viable embryos were similar (all p > 0.05) between the two groups.

Stimulation protocols for Severe Endometriosis- is there any difference?

Endometriosis, being an estrogen-dependent condition, can lead to subfertility in women. Those facing difficulty achieving pregnancy goals may need assistance from assisted reproductive technology (ART). Due to the challenges posed by endometriosis in natural conception, assisted reproductive technologies like IVF and ICSI. Objective of the study: This study aimed to compare ART outcomes in women with endometriosis following the three distinct groups of protocols undergoing various treatment modalities, namely the progestin-primed ovarian Stimulation protocol, GnRH agonist long protocol, and Combined Oral Contraceptives (OCPs). This investigation aims to enhance our understanding of how different stimulation protocols may influence ART outcomes Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study between March 2019 to March 2023. The study collected data from 126 infertile women diagnosed with endometriosis, who were undergoing their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle at MHRT Hospital and Research Center, Hyderabad, Telangana India. Patients in each group were classified into three Protocols ie-GnRH agonist Long Protocol, Progestins primed Ovarian Stimulation, and Combined Oral Contraceptives. The outcomes of the ICSI program were evaluated Result: The findings from our study suggest that women with endometriosis undergoing ICSI experience improved reproductive outcomes when subjected to prolonged downregulation with GnRH agonist long protocol, Progestin primed Ovarian Stimulation and Combined Oral Contraceptives before initiating ovarian stimulation. Notably, the clinical pregnancy rate is notably higher at GnRH agonist long Protocol 57.5% compared to the alternative protocols: PPOS at 34.2 % and Combined Oral Contraceptives at 40.54 %. The groups subjected to extended pituitary downregulation with GnRH agonists long protocol demonstrated superior clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared to those following the PPOS and Combined Oral Contraceptives. Our segmented IVF approach, including FET cycles, revealed a higher live birth rate in the GnRH agonist protocol compared to the PPOS and Combined Oral Contraceptives. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that GnRH agonists' long protocol demonstrated superior clinical pregnancy and live birth rates compared to those following the PPOS and Combined Oral Contraceptives. Better clinical outcomes were observed in the GnRH agonist long protocol group when compared to the PPOS and Combined Oral Contraceptive group.

A randomized controlled trial to compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response

ObjectiveTo compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer following ovarian stimulation by the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol versus the antagonist protocol in women with anticipated high ovarian response undergoing IVF DesignRandomized controlled trial SettingsA tertiary assisted reproduction center PatientsInfertile women aged <43 years undergoing the first IVF cycle and having antral follicle count >15 InterventionsMedroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily was given from the start of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol. In the antagonist protocol, an antagonist 0.25mg daily was given from 6th day of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger. Blinding was not possible for women or physicians but the biostatistician was blinded to the group assignment. Main Outcome MeasuresLive birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer cycle Results784 women were recruited from June 2020 and October 2021 and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: progestin-primed ovarian stimulation group (n=392) and antagonist group (n=392). Embryo transfer was either cancelled or postponed in 62 (62/392, 15.8%) women in the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation group and 65 (65/392, 16.6%) in the antagonist group because of no transferable embryos or no frozen embryo transfer within 6 months following randomizaion. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics and number of oocytes obtained/fertilized, the number of cleaving embryos, number of good quality embryos at day 3, number of blastocysts developed and number of embryo/blastocyst frozen. There was no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer cycle between the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and antagonist groups based on both intention to treat [37.5.0% (147/392) versus 32.7% (128/392), RR 1.148 (95% CI=0.949–1.390), P=0.16] and per protocol analysis [44.5% (147/330) versus 39.1.% (128/327), RR 1.138 (95%CI = 0.950–1.364), P=0.16]. Both groups showed comparable clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates. ConclusionThe live birth rates of the first frozen embryo transfer following the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and the antagonist protocol were comparable in women with an anticipated high ovarian response.

Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol (FGnRHan) In Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response of a Substantial Cohort

Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Versus Flexible GnRH Antagonist Protocol (FGnRHan) In Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Ovarian Response of a Substantial Cohort

The cumulative live birth rates of 18 593 women with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation-related protocols and frozen-thawed transfer cycles.

What are the odds of achieving pregnancy when adopting progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS)-related protocols combined with repetitive frozen-thawed transfer (FET) cycles in patients with different clinical characteristics? The cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) of women undergoing different PPOS-related protocols can be significantly and consistently enhanced within six FET cycles when the female age is <40 years (or even <45 years) and when >5 oocytes are retrieved, regardless of antral follicle count (AFC). There have been numerous studies on the live birth rate of the first FET cycle in patients with PPOS-related protocols. These studies have focused mainly on comparing pregnancy outcomes with those of other stimulation protocols. However, owing to the unique features of the PPOS-related strategy, such as its flexible timing of oocyte retrieval and repeated transfer of frozen embryos, studies using the CLBR as an overall indicator of success and investigating which types of patients would benefit from this protocol are lacking. This retrospective cohort study included 18 593 women who underwent PPOS-related protocols (dydrogesterone + hMG, medroxyprogesterone acetate + hMG, micronized progesterone + hMG treatment, and luteal-phase ovarian stimulation protocol) from 1 March 2011 to 31 September 2022 in our centre. The population was categorized by female age, number of oocytes retrieved, and AFC in the analysis of CLBR within six FET cycles. The age groups (Groups 1-5, respectively) were <30, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, and ≥45 years. The number of oocytes retrieved was grouped as 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, and >20. AFC was grouped as <5, 5-10, 11-15, and >15. The Kaplan-Meier analysis (optimistic method), which hypothesized that patients who did not continue treatment had the same chance of achieving a live birth as those who continued, and the competing risk method (conservative method) which hypothesized they had no chance of achieving a live birth, were applied. In further analyses, the Cox model and Fine-Gray model were adopted: the former corresponds to the optimistic scenario, and the latter corresponds to the pessimistic scenario. CLBR had a declining trend with female age over six FET cycles (Groups 1-5, respectively: optimistic: 96.9%, 96.6%, 91.4%, 67.3%, and 11.7%; conservative: 87.3%, 85.0%, 74.0%, 41.3%, and 7.5%), requiring more FET cycles to achieve a success rate of at least 50% (Groups 1-5, respectively: optimistic: 2, 2, 2, 4, and >6 cycles; conservative: 2, 2, 2, >,6 and >6 cycles). CLBR showed an increasing trend with the number of oocytes retrieved (Groups 1-5, respectively: optimistic: 93.8%, 94.3%, 95.8%, 96.0%, and 95.6%; conservative: 66.2%, 78.3%, 85.6%, 88.9%, and 91.0%). All groups needed the same number of FET cycles to achieve a success rate of at least 50% (Groups 1-5, respectively: optimistic: 2, 2, 2, 2, and 2 cycles; conservative: 2, 2, 2, 2, and 2 cycles). Furthermore, the CLBR within six FET cycles had an increasing trend with AFC number (Groups 1-4, respectively: optimistic: 89.2%, 94.8%, 95.9%, and 96.3%; conservative: 67.4%, 78.2%, 83.9%, and 88.1%), with all four groups achieving a success rate of at least 50% by the second FET cycle. The current research is limited by its retrospective design and single-centre nature, which may restrict the generalizability of our findings. This work describes two models (the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the competing risk method) to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients using PPOS-related protocols, which are especially useful for patients of advanced age or those with diminished ovarian reserve. Our findings encourage patients below 45 years old, especially younger than 40 years, and patients with lower AFCs and fewer retrieved oocytes to try this new protocol. Moreover, this study demonstrates the degree of improvement in the CLBR within six FET cycles for patients with different clinical characteristics, providing a valuable point of reference to determine whether to continue ART after a transfer failure. The study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071603 to L.W., 82001502 to Y.L.). There are no conflicts of interest to declare. N/A.

The comparison between fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate combined with letrozole in patients of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: a propensity score-matched study.

To explore the cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) using fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in conjunction with letrozole (LE) in infertile women by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective cohort study. Tertiary-care academic medical center. A total of 3173 infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment within the period from January 2017 to December 2020. A total of 1068 and 783 patients who underwent a fixed dose of MPA combined with LE and a degressive dose of MPA combined with LE protocols, respectively, were enrolled in this study. The freeze-all approach and later frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) were performed in both groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. The primary outcomes were the dosage of MPA and the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the fetal malformation rate. We created a perfect match of 478 patients in each group. The dosage of MPA, the LH serum level on the eighth day of stimulation, progesterone (P) level and LH level on the hCG trigger day were significantly higher in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (52.1 ± 13.1 mg vs. 44.9 ± 12.5 mg; 5.0 ± 2.7 IU/L vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 IU/L; 0.9 ± 0.5 ng/ml vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml; 3.3 ± 2.4 IU/L vs. 2.8 ± 1.9 IU/L; P < 0.01). The duration of Gn, the number of follicles with diameter more than 16mm on trigger day, the estradiol (E2) level on the hCG trigger day were lower in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (9.7 ± 1.7 days vs. 10.3 ± 1.5 days; 5.6 ± 3.0 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0; 1752.5 ± 1120.8 pg/ml vs. 1997.2 ± 1108.5 pg/ml; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of premature LH surge, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), CLBR or fetal malformation rate between the two groups. The combination of a degressive MPA dose with LE proved effective in reducing the total MPA dosage with comparable premature LH surge and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing the PPOS protocol.

Non-inferiority of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol: A propensity score-weighted analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol in ovarian stimulation. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we included 804 patients who were treated between January 1st, 2022, and July 1st, 2023. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation were compared between the PPOS (n = 206) and GnRH-ant (n = 598). The primary outcome was the number of good cleavage embryos. ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, the mean number of good cleavage embryos in PPOS (6.33) was non-inferior to GnRH-ant (6.44; unadjusted ratio of two means 1.02, 95%CI 0.92, 1.13). The trigger-day estradiol level in patients with PPOS was higher than in patients with GnRH-ant (4,420 vs 3,830 pg/ml, respectively) despite similar total follicle stimulating hormone dose and fewer days of ovarian stimulation. The number of oocytes, MII oocytes, cleavage and blastocyst embryos were comparable between the two protocols. After the first transfer of embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in the PPOS group, while the pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were not significantly different. None of the PPOS patients had an unexpected LH surge, and serum LH levels decreased slightly during ovarian stimulation. ConclusionsThe PPOS protocol with dydrogesterone provided similar embryo outcomes to the GnRH-ant protocol, with notable distinctions in clinical pregnancy and implantation rate. The serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation using PPOS was well-controlled.

#345 : Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol Slightly Improves the IVF Funnel in Patients with Poor Ovarian Response

Background and Aims: Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) is a crucial first step in the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) or Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) process. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has been recently introduced as an alternative to traditional COS regimens. However, the efficacy of PPOS regimen among infertile women with poor ovarian response (POR) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PPOS regimen on the chance of success throughout the IVF process in Vietnamese infertile women with POR. Method: This randomized controlled trial included 120 infertile women with POR (according to POSEIDON criteria) who received IVF at Tam Anh Fertility Center (Hanoi, Vietnam). PPOS and GnRH_ant regimens were randomly applied to the participants (n=60 for each group). A chain of 4 successive Binomial regression models has been applied to estimate the chance of success for 4 steps: oocyte maturation, fertilization and achieving good quality day-3 and day-5 embryos. The effect of PPOS in comparison with GnRH_ant protocol was evaluated by marginal risk-ratio (RR) from each model. Results: Chances of successfully achieving the MII oocytes, fertilization, high-quality D3 and D5 embryos were all moderately higher when using the PPOS regimen, compared with those of GnRH_ant protocol (95% confidence intervals of RR were respectively 0.88–1.07, 0.89–1.14, 0.96–1.14 and 0.74–1.73). Conclusion: Although not yet reached a statistical significance, those results indicated that using PPOS protocol may slightly improve the chance of success in 4 first critical steps of the IVF process for infertile women with POR.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with poor ovarian response: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial

IntroductionApproximately 17.5% of couples of reproductive age have experienced infertility. Women with a poor ovarian response (POR) must undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and embryo transfer to achieve pregnancy. However,...

Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using dydrogesterone from day 7 of the cycle onwards in oocyte donation cycles: a longitudinal study

Does a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with dydrogesterone from cycle day 7 yield similar outcomes compared with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in the same oocyte donors? This retrospective longitudinal study included 128 cycles from 64 oocyte donors. All oocyte donors had the same type of gonadotrophin and daily dose in both stimulation cycles. The primary outcome was the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) retrieved. The number of COC retrieved (mean ± SD 19.7 ± 10.8 versus 19.2 ± 8.3; P = 0.5) and the number of metaphase II oocytes (15.5 ± 8.4 versus 16.2 ± 7.0; P = 0.19) were similar for the PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols, respectively. The duration of stimulation (10.5 ± 1.5 days versus 10.8 ± 1.5 days; P = 0.14) and consumption of gonadotrophins (2271.9 ± 429.7 IU versus 2321.5 ± 403.4 IU; P = 0.2) were also comparable, without any cases of premature ovulation. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the total cost of medication per cycle: €898.3 ± 169.9 for the PPOS protocol versus €1196.4 ± 207.5 (P < 0.001) for the GnRH antagonist protocol. The number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II oocytes were comparable in both stimulation protocols, with the advantage of significant cost reduction in favour of the PPOS protocol compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol. No cases of premature ovulation were observed, even when progestin was started later in the stimulation.

Cumulative live birth rate in mild versus conventional stimulation in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocols for individuals with low prognosis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) of mild stimulation and conventional stimulation for the low-prognosis population undergoing PPOS protocols. This was a retrospective cohort study. We included women with a low prognosis. All women underwent PPOS protocols, and the starting gonadotropin (Gn) dose was 150 IU or 300 IU. The primary outcome measure was CLBR. The secondary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, number of 2PN oocytes and number of available embryos. In total, 171 women with mild stimulation and 1810 women with conventional stimulation met the criteria. In the PSM model, 171 mild stimulation cycles were matched with 513 conventional stimulation cycles. The gonadotropin dosage in the mild stimulation group was significantly lower than that in the conventional stimulation group (1878.6 ± 1065.7 vs. 2854.7 ± 821.0, P<0.001). The numbers of oocytes retrieved, 2PN oocytes, available embryos and high-quality embryos were also higher in the conventional stimulation group than in the mild stimulation group (P<0.05). There was no significant between-group difference in the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (26.3% vs. 27.5%, P=0.77). The CLBR after mild stimulation was similar to that after conventional stimulation (21.1% vs. 22.0%, P=0.79). In our study, we found that the CLBRs of mild stimulation and conventional stimulation were similar, despite conventional stimulation resulting in significantly more oocytes and embryos. Thus, mild stimulation can be considered an option for women with a low prognosis in PPOS protocols.