Progesterone Receptor Complexes Research Articles

FGF7/FGFR2-JunB signalling counteracts the effect of progesterone in luminal breast cancer.

We have recently demonstrated that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2)‐mediated signalling alters progesterone receptor (PR) activity and response of oestrogen receptor α (ER)‐positive (ER+) breast cancer (BCa) cell lines to anti‐ER agents. Little is known about whether the crosstalk between ER and PR, shown to be modulated by the hormonal background, might also be affected by FGFR2. Here, PR‐dependent behaviour of ER+ BCa cells was studied in the presence of oestrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) and/or FGF7. In vitro analyses showed that FGF7/FGFR2 signalling: (a) abolished the effect of P4 on E2‐promoted 3D cell growth and response to tamoxifen; (b) regulated ER and PR expression and activity; (c) increased formation of ER–PR complexes; and (d) reversed P4‐triggered deregulation of ER‐dependent genes. Analysis of clinical data demonstrated that the prognostic value of FGFR2 varied between patients with different menopausal status; that is, high expression of FGFR2 was significantly associated with longer progression‐free survival (PFS) in postmenopausal patients, whereas there was no significant association in premenopausal patients. FGFR2 was found to positively correlate with the expression of JunB proto‐oncogene, AP‐1 transcription factor subunit (JUNB), an ER‐dependent gene, only in premenopausal patients. Molecular analyses revealed that the presence of JunB was a prerequisite for FGFR2‐mediated abrogation of P4‐induced inhibition of cell growth. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the FGF7/FGFR2–JunB axis abolishes the modulatory effects of PR on ER‐associated biological functions in premenopausal ER+ BCa. This may provide foundations for a better selection of patients for FGFR‐targeting therapeutic strategies.

Mechanism of Telapristone Acetate (CDB4124) on Progesterone Receptor Action in Breast Cancer Cells

Progesterone is a steroid hormone that plays an important role in the breast. Progesterone exerts its action through binding to progesterone receptor (PR), a transcription factor. Deregulation of the progesterone signaling pathway is implicated in the formation, development, and progression of breast cancer. Next-generation selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) have potent antiprogestin activity and are selective for PR, reducing the off-target effects on other nuclear receptors. To date, there is limited information on how the newer generation of SPRMs, specifically telapristone acetate (TPA), affect PR function at the molecular level. In this study, T47D breast cancer cells were used to investigate the molecular mechanism by which TPA antagonizes PR action. Global profiling of the PR cistrome and interactome was done with chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) and rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry. Validation studies were done on key genes and interactions. Our results demonstrate that treatment with the progestin (R5020) alone resulted in robust PR recruitment to the chromatin, and addition of TPA reduced PR recruitment globally. TPA significantly changed coregulator recruitment to PR compared with R5020. Upon conservative analysis, three proteins (TRPS1, LASP1, and AP1G1) were identified in the R5020+TPA-treated group. Silencing TRPS1 with small interfering RNA increased PR occupancy to the known PR regulatory regions and attenuated the inhibition of gene expression after TPA treatment. TRPS1 silencing alleviated the inhibition of proliferation by TPA. In conclusion, TPA decreases PR occupancy on chromatin and recruits coregulators such as TRPS1 to the PR complex, thereby regulating PR target gene expression and associated cellular responses.

Abstract 1812: Mechanism of telapristone acetate (CDB4124) on progesterone receptor action in breast cancer cells

Abstract Progesterone is a steroid hormone that plays an important role in the breast. Progesterone exerts its action through binding to Progesterone Receptor (PR), a transcription factor that belongs to the nuclear receptor family. Deregulation of the progesterone signaling pathway is implicated in the formation, development and progression of breast cancer. Next generation selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) have potent anti-progestin activity and are selective for PR, reducing the off-target effects on other nuclear receptors. To date, there is limited information on how the newer generation of SPRM's such as Telapristone acetate (TPA), affect PR function at the molecular level. In this study we investigated the molecular mechanisms by which TPA antagonizes PR action in T47D breast cancer cells. First, we performed ChiP sequencing to obtain a global analysis of the effect of TPA on the PR cistrome. We observed that TPA decreases PR genome wide recruitment to the chromatin. Approximately 19,865 and 19,892 PR binding peaks were identified in the progestin, R5020 or R5020 + TPA data sets, respectively, with 83% (18,113) of overlapping PR binding regions. HOMER motif analysis indicated similar enriched motifs between R5020 and R5020+TPA groups, identifying progesterone response elements as the most significant motif. We validated our ChiP-seq data with PR ChIP by examining the promoter regions of known PR target genes. PR occupancy was decreased at these sites with the addition of TPA. In addition, TPA decreased R5020- driven expression of these genes. To further investigate the mechanism by which TPA inhibits PR transcriptional activity we performed Rapid immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry of endogenous proteins (RIME). TPA significantly influenced co-regulator recruitment to PR. After applying a stringent cut-off to our data set, 3 unique proteins were identified in the R5020+TPA group: TRPS1, LASP1 and AP1G1. TRPS1 has been shown to be a transcriptional corepressor and is overexpressed in majority of human breast cancer. Follow-up studies revealed an increase in the levels of PR-TRPS1 complex with TPA treatment. In addition, silencing TRPS1 with siRNA increased PR occupancy to the known PR gene promoters, suggesting that TRPS1 inhibited PR binding to these regions upon TPA treatment. In addition, knockdown of TRPS1 attenuated the inhibition of ACSL1, NOTCH2, PACSIN1 and GREB1 gene expression after TPA treatment. Taken together our results show that TPA decreases recruitment of PR to chromatin, recruits co-repressors such as TRPS1 to the PR complex thereby regulates PR target gene expression. This is the first study showing TRPS1 complexes with PR and regulates its activity. Ongoing studies are focused on the potential role of TRPS1 as a predictive biomarker of SPRM response in breast cancer. Citation Format: Batzaya Davaadelger, Seema A. Khan, J Julie Kim. Mechanism of telapristone acetate (CDB4124) on progesterone receptor action in breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1812.

YY1 Positively Regulates Transcription by Targeting Promoters and Super-Enhancers through the BAF Complex in Embryonic Stem Cells.

SummaryYin Yang 1 (YY1) regulates early embryogenesis and adult tissue formation. However, the role of YY1 in stem cell regulation remains unclear. YY1 has a Polycomb group (PcG) protein-dependent role in mammalian cells. The PcG-independent functions of YY1 are also reported, although their underlying mechanism is still undefined. This paper reports the role of YY1 and BAF complex in the OCT4-mediated pluripotency network in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). The interaction between YY1 and BAF complex promotes mESC proliferation and pluripotency. Knockdown of Yy1 or Smarca4, the core component of the BAF complex, downregulates pluripotency markers and upregulates several differentiation markers. Moreover, YY1 enriches at both promoter and super-enhancer regions to stimulate transcription. Thus, this study elucidates the role of YY1 in regulating pluripotency through its interaction with OCT4 and the BAF complex and the role of BAF complex in integrating YY1 into the core pluripotency network.

Long-range chromatin interactions control trophoblast-restricted HLA-G expression during pregnancy (IRM6P.657)

Abstract Human pregnancy poses an immunological paradox: at the fetal-maternal interface, semi-allogeneic fetal extravillous trophoblasts (EVT) invade the uterine mucosa without being rejected by the maternal immune system. HLA-G is a nonclassical MHC class I molecule specifically expressed on the surface of EVT and is believed to be a key to fetus-induced immune tolerance. However, the EVT-specific expression of HLA-G is still poorly understood. A novel enhancer more than 10 kb upstream of HLA-G, Enhancer L, was discovered via dissection of the HLA-G locus using a Massively Parallel Reporter Assay (MPRA). DNase I Hypersensitive Site (DHS) mapping, Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) and reporter gene assays established Enhancer L as a cell type-specific enhancer that loops into the HLA-G classical promoter. Strikingly, deletion of Enhancer L using a CRISPR/Cas9 dual guide approach results in complete ablation of HLA-G expression. Saturation mutagenesis of Enhancer L revealed the existence of motifs for transcription factors paramount in trophoblast development. Two of them, GATA2 and CEBPB, associate with Enhancer L and the HLA-G classical promoter, and are absolutely required for HLA-G expression. Interestingly, progesterone upregulates HLA-G, as well as GATA2, via a nonclassical membrane progesterone receptor complex in trophoblasts. These findings shed light on the mechanism by which HLA-G is specifically expressed in invasive trophoblasts during pregnancy.

Study of Proliferative Processes and Nuclear Estradiol and Progesterone Receptors in Myocytes in Pregnant and Postpartum Mouse Uterus

Numerical densities of the nuclei were morhometrically evaluated in all myocytes and myocytes expressing nuclear estrogen- and progesterone-receptor complexes, which were revealed immunohistochemically with monoclonal antibodies in C57Bl/6 mice. It was shown that the above quantitative parameters of myometrial cells after the first pregnancy were similar to those in nonpregnant mice by day 10 after delivery. In the third pregnancy, especially developed after the second interrupted pregnancy, proliferation processes in the myometrium were not completed by postpartum day 10, but dramatically progressed. It was associated with a significant decrease in the fraction of myocytes carrying nuclear hormone-receptor complexes with estradiol and progesterone and their disturbed physiological relations in the myometrium during and after pregnancy probably due to dedifferentiation of a considerable part of myocytes.

Abstract 2174: Progesterone receptor, AP-1 and Stat3 cooperative transcriptional complex in breast cancer

Abstract We have previously demonstrated that progestin induces the rapid activation of AP-1 transcription factor and its nuclear interaction with the progesterone receptor (PR) by tethering in C4HD cells an experimental model of hormonal carcinogenesis in which the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) induced mammary adenocarcinomas in female Balb/c mice and in the human breast cancer line T47D. In this work, we demonstrated that MPA induces AP-1 transcriptional activation through the activation of MAPKs signaling pathways. Our recent findings have demonstrated that MPA induces the recruitment of Stat3 and PR to the GAS site in the cyclin D1 promoter. Here, we identified a novel PR/AP-1/Stat3 transcriptional complex in breast cancer cells. Cyclin D1 is a cancer-related protein whose promoter contains AP-1 binding sites (TRE sites) and Stat3 binding sites (GAS sites) in a very close proximity and lacks progesterone response elements (PRE sites). By using quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and sequential ChIP, we demonstrated that progestin induces the recruitment of c-jun, c-fos and PR to the TRE site and this recruitment is abolished when we pretreat the cells with the MAPKs inhibitor U0126. When cells were transfected with c-jun and c-fos Dominant Negatives Forms (TAM-67 and A-Fos respectively) none of these proteins are able to activate cyclin D1 promoter or are recruited to the TRE site and there is not MPA-induced Stat3 recruitment to the GAS site. In the same way when we pre-treat the cells with siRNAs against Stat3 neither c-jun, c-fos, PR or Stat3 are recruited to the AP-1 or GAS siteS in the cyclin D1 promoter. Inhibition of MPA-induced AP-1 transcriptional activation by transfection of breast cancer cells with TAM-67 and A-Fos resulted in complete abrogation of progestin-induced in vitro and in vivo breast cancer growth. Our findings reveal a novel MPA-induced PR/AP-1/Stat3 cooperative transcriptional complex in breast cancer cells. Interestingly the blockage of any of the members of the complex prevents its assembly and inhibits the MPA-induced cyclin D1 up-regulation and cell proliferation. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2174. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2174

Single-point mutation in a conserved TPR domain of Hip disrupts enhancement of glucocorticoid receptor signaling

The Hsp70-interacting protein Hip has been identified as a transient participant in the assembly of both glucocorticoid (GR) and progesterone receptor complexes. Although it has been difficult to identify a physiological role for Hip, it is believed to have intrinsic chaperoning properties and has been identified as a potential anti-apoptotic target of Granzyme B. In vitro assays have provided evidence that Hip may interact with GR complexes in an Hsp70 independent manner and can enhance the function of GR in hormone based reporter assays. In this study, a cDNA for human Hip was used in mutational analysis to map Hip function to critical structural elements. A single amino acid substitution (L211S) resulted in a loss of Hip function. This mutation also appears to disrupt the interaction of Hip with Hsp70 in vitro. Failure to recover Hip-L211S constructs in co-immunoprecipitation assays with an Hsp70 monoclonal antibody suggests that the mutation is unlikely to result in a misfolded substrate.

A simple procedure for the derivation of electron density based surfaces of drug-receptor complexes from a combination of X-ray data and theoretical calculations.

To contribute to an understanding of biological recognition and interaction, an easy-to-use procedure was developed to generate and display molecular surfaces and selected electron density based surface properties. To overcome the present limitations to derive electron densities of macromolecules, the considered systems were reduced to appropriate substructures around the active centers. The combination of experimental X-ray structural information and aspherical atomic electron density data from theoretical calculations resulted in properties like the electrostatic potential and the Hirshfeld surface which allowed a study of electronic complementarity and the identification of sites and strengths of drug-receptor interactions. Applications were examined for three examples. The anilinoquinazoline gefitinib (Iressa(R)) belongs to a new class of anticancer drugs that inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In the second example, the interaction of epoxide inhibitors with the main protease of the SARS coronavirus was investigated. Furthermore, the progesterone receptor complex was examined. The quantitative analysis of hydrogen bonding in the chosen substructure systems follows a progression elaborated earlier on the basis of accurate small molecule crystal structures. This finding and results from modified substructures suggest that also the surface properties seem robust enough to provide stable information about the recognition of interacting biomolecular species although they are obtained from medium molecular weighted subfragments of macromolecular complexes, which consist of no more than approximately 40 residues.

Minireview: role of kinases and chromatin remodeling in progesterone signaling to chromatin.

Steroid hormones regulate gene expression by interaction of their receptors with hormone-responsive elements on DNA or with other transcription factors, but they can also activate cytoplasmic signaling cascades. Rapid activation of Erk by progestins via an interaction of the progesterone receptor (PR) with the estrogen receptor is critical for transcriptional activation of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter and other progesterone target genes. Erk activation leads to the phosphorylation of PR, activation of mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1, and the recruitment of a complex of the three activated proteins and of P300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) to a single nucleosome, resulting in the phosphoacetylation of histone H3 and the displacement of heterochromatin protein 1γ. Hormone-dependent gene expression requires ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes. Two switch/sucrose nonfermentable-like complexes, Brahma-related gene 1-associated factor (BAF) and polybromo-BAF are present in breast cancer cells, but only BAF is recruited to the MMTV promoter and cooperates with PCAF during activation of hormone-responsive promoters. PCAF acetylates histone H3 at K14, an epigenetic mark recognized by BAF subunits, thus anchoring the complex to chromatin. BAF catalyzes localized displacement of histones H2A and H2B, facilitating access of nuclear factor 1 and additional PR complexes to the hidden hormone-responsive elements on the MMTV promoter. The linker histone H1 is a structural component of chromatin generally regarded as a general repressor of transcription. However, it contributes to a better regulation of the MMTV promoter by favoring a more homogeneous nucleosome positioning, thus reducing basal transcription and actually enhancing hormone induced transcription. During transcriptional activation, H1 is phosphorylated and displaced from the promoter. The kinase cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is activated after progesterone treatment and could catalyze progesterone-induced phosphorylation of histone H1 by chromatin remodeling complexes. The initial steps of gene induction by progestins involve changes in the chromatin organization of target promoters that require the activation of several kinase signaling pathways initiated by membrane anchored PR. Because these pathways also respond to other external signals, they serve to integrate the hormonal response in the global context of the cellular environment.

Regulation of thrombospondin-1 by natural and synthetic progestins in human breast cancer cells

Our recent studies show that progestins induce vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in breast cancer cells that express mutant p53 protein. Here, we show that natural and synthetic progestins also induce thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) mRNA and protein in T47-D and BT-474 breast cancer cells. Antiprogestin RU-486 inhibits the induction of VEGF and TSP-1 by progestins, suggesting that this effect of progestin is mediated by the progesterone receptor (PR). Actinomycin-D, but not puromycin, also blocks progestin-dependent induction of TSP-1. A putative progestin-response element was identified in the human TSP-1 promoter, which is consistent with the hypothesis that a progestin-PR complex might directly regulate transcription of the TSP-1 gene in human cells. Conditioned medium from progestin-treated breast cancer cells stimulates endothelial cell proliferation in the absence though not in the presence of antibody to TSP-1, indicating that TSP-1 secreted by breast cancer cells could be pro-angiogenic. Since tumor cell-derived TSP-1 has the potential to promote angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment, it could be a potential target for breast cancer therapy.

Deficiency of Immunophilin FKBP52 Promotes Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease that affects approximately 10% of women of childbearing age. It is characterized by endometrial growth outside the uterus and often results in inflamed lesions, pain, and reduced fertility. Although heightened estrogenic activity and/or reduced progesterone responsiveness are considered to be involved in the etiology of endometriosis, neither the extent of their participation nor the underlying mechanisms are clearly understood. Heterogeneous uterine cell types differentially respond to estrogen and progesterone (P(4)). P(4), primarily acting via its nuclear receptor (PR), activates gene transcription and impacts many reproductive processes. Deletion of Fkbp52, an immunophilin cochaperone for PR, results in uterine-specific P(4) resistance in mice, creating an opportunity to study the unique aspects of P(4) signaling in endometriosis. Here we explored the roles of FKBP52 in this disease using Fkbp52(-/-) mice. We found that the loss of FKBP52 encourages the growth of endometriotic lesions with increased inflammation, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis. We also found remarkable down-regulation of FKBP52 in cases of human endometriosis. Our results provide the first evidence corroborated by genetic studies in mice for a potential role of an immunophilin cochaperone in the etiology of human endometriosis. This investigation is highly relevant for clinical application, particularly because P(4) resistance is favorably indicated in endometriosis and other gynecological diseases.

Chromatin Remodeling and Control of Cell Proliferation by Progestins via Cross Talk of Progesterone Receptor with the Estrogen Receptors and Kinase Signaling Pathways

Transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter can be induced by glucocorticoids or progestins. Progesterone treatment of cultured cells carrying an integrated single copy of an MMTV transgene leads to recruitment of progesterone receptor (PR), SWI/SNF, and SNF2h-related complexes to MMTV promoter. Recruitment is accompanied by selective displacement of histones H2A and H2B from the nucleosome B. In nucleosomes assembled on promoter sequences, SWI/SNF displaces histones H2A and H2B from MMTV nucleosome B, but not from other MMTV nucleosomes or from an rDNA promoter nucleosome. Thus, the outcome of nucleosome remodeling by purified SWI/SNF depends on the DNA sequence. On the other hand, 5 min after hormone treatment, the cytoplasmic signaling cascade Src/Ras/Erk is activated via an interaction of PR with the estrogen receptor, which activates Src. As a consequence of Erk activation PR is phosphorylated, Msk1 is activated, and a ternary complex PR-Erk-Msk1 is recruited to MMTV nucleosome B. Msk1 phosphorylates H3 at serine 10, which is followed by acetylation at lysine 14, displacement of HP1gamma, and recruitment of Brg1, PCAF, and RNA polymerase II. Blocking Erk activation or Msk1 activity prevents induction of the MMTV transgene. Thus, the rapid nongenomic effects of progestins are essential for their transcriptional effects on certain progestin target genes. In rat endometrial stromal cells, picomolar concentrations of progestins trigger the cross talk of PR with ERbeta that activates the Erk and Akt kinase pathways leading to cell proliferation in the absence of direct transcriptional effects of the ligand-activated PR. Thus, depending on the cellular context rapid kinase activation and transcriptional effect play different roles in the physiological response to progestins.

Defining the Requirements for Hsp40 and Hsp70 in the Hsp90 Chaperone Pathway

The Hsp90 chaperoning pathway and its model client substrate, the progesterone receptor (PR), have been used extensively to study chaperone complex formation and maturation of a client substrate in a near native state. This chaperoning pathway can be reconstituted in vitro with the addition of five proteins plus ATP: Hsp40, Hsp70, Hop, Hsp90, and p23. The addition of these proteins is necessary to reconstitute hormone-binding capacity to the immuno-isolated PR. It was recently shown that the first step for the recognition of PR by this system is binding by Hsp40. We compared type I and type II Hsp40 proteins and created point mutations in Hsp40 and Hsp70 to understand the requirements for this first step. The type I proteins, Ydj1 and DjA1 (HDJ2), and a type II, DjB1 (HDJ1), act similarly in promoting hormone binding and Hsp70 association to PR, while having different binding characteristics to PR. Ydj1 and DjA1 bind tightly to PR whereas the binding of DjB1 apparently has rapid on and off rates and its binding cannot be observed by antibody pull-down methods using either purified proteins or cell lysates. Mutation studies indicate that client binding, interactions between Hsp40 and Hsp70, plus ATP hydrolysis by Hsp70 are all required to promote conformational maturation of PR via the Hsp90 pathway.

Regulation of the Amino-Terminal Transcription Activation Domain of Progesterone Receptor by a Cofactor-Induced Protein Folding Mechanism

We previously identified a small basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein, Jun dimerization protein 2 (JDP-2), that acts as a coregulator of the N-terminal transcriptional activation domain of progesterone receptor (PR). We show here that JDP-2, through interaction with the DNA binding domain (DBD), induces or stabilizes structure in the N-terminal domain in a manner that correlates with JDP-2 stimulation of transcriptional activity. Circular dichroism spectroscopy experiments showed that JDP-2 interaction caused a significant increase in overall helical content of a two-domain PR polypeptide containing the N-terminal domain and DBD and that the change in structure resides primarily in the N-terminal domain. Thermal melt curves showed that the JDP-2/PR complex is significantly more stable than either protein alone, and partial proteolysis confirmed that JDP-2 interaction alters conformation of the N-terminal domain of PR. Functional analysis of N-terminal domain mutants and receptor chimeras provides evidence that the stimulatory effect of JDP-2 on transcriptional activity of PR is mediated through an interdomain communication between the DBD and the N-terminal domain and that transcriptional activity and functional response to JDP-2 are mediated by multiple elements of the N-terminal domain as opposed to a discrete region.

Functional Comparison of Human and Drosophila Hop Reveals Novel Role in Steroid Receptor Maturation

Hsp70/Hsp90 organizing protein (Hop) coordinates Hsp70 and Hsp90 interactions during assembly of steroid receptor complexes. Hop is composed of three tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains (TPR1, TPR2a, and TPR2b) and two DP repeat domains (DP1 and DP2); Hsp70 interacts directly with TPR1 and Hsp90 with TPR2a, but the function of other domains is less clear. Human Hop and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ortholog Sti1p, which share a common domain arrangement, are functionally interchangeable in a yeast growth assay and in supporting the efficient maturation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function. To gain a better understanding of Hop structure/function relationships, we have extended comparisons to the Hop ortholog from Drosophila melanogaster (dHop), which lacks DP1. Although dHop binds Hsp70 and Hsp90 and can rescue the growth defect in yeast lacking Sti1p, dHop failed to support GR function in yeast, which suggests a novel role for Hop in GR maturation that goes beyond Hsp binding. Chimeric Hop constructs combining human and Drosophila domains demonstrate that the C-terminal domain DP2 is critical for this previously unrecognized role in steroid receptor function.

Estrogens and progesterone promote persistent CCND1 gene activation during G1 by inducing transcriptional derepression via c-Jun/c-Fos/estrogen receptor (progesterone receptor) complex assembly to a distal regulatory element and recruitment of cyclin D1 to its own gene promoter.

Transcriptional activation of the cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) plays a pivotal role in G(1)-phase progression, which is thereby controlled by multiple regulatory factors, including nuclear receptors (NRs). Appropriate CCND1 gene activity is essential for normal development and physiology of the mammary gland, where it is regulated by ovarian steroids through a mechanism(s) that is not fully elucidated. We report here that CCND1 promoter activation by estrogens in human breast cancer cells is mediated by recruitment of a c-Jun/c-Fos/estrogen receptor alpha complex to the tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate-responsive element of the gene, together with Oct-1 to a site immediately adjacent. This process coincides with the release from the same DNA region of a transcriptional repressor complex including Yin-Yang 1 (YY1) and histone deacetylase 1 and is sufficient to induce the assembly of the basal transcription machinery on the promoter and to lead to initial cyclin D1 accumulation in the cell. Later on in estrogen stimulation, the cyclin D1/Cdk4 holoenzyme associates with the CCND1 promoter, where E2F and pRb can also be found, contributing to the long-lasting gene enhancement required to drive G(1)-phase completion. Interestingly, progesterone triggers similar regulatory events through its own NRs, suggesting that the gene regulation cascade described here represents a crossroad for the transcriptional control of G(1)-phase progression by different classes of NRs.

Progesterone Receptor Deficient in Chromatin Binding Has an Altered Cellular State

Our previous work has shown that the progesterone receptor (PR) can exist in two distinct functional states in mammary adenocarcinoma cells. The differences in function included the ability to activate a promoter in organized chromatin, sensitivity to ligand, and ligand-independent activation. To determine whether these functional differences were because of altered cellular processing, we carried out biochemical analyses of the functionally distinct PRs. Although the majority of PR is localized to the nucleus, biochemical partitioning resulted in a loosely bound (cytosolic) fraction, and a tightly bound (nuclear) fraction. In the absence of progestins, the functionally distinct PRs differed significantly in partitioning between the two fractions. To characterize these fractions further, we analyzed interactions of unliganded PR with chaperones by coimmunoprecipitation. We determined that PR in the cytosolic fraction associated with hsp90 and p23. In contrast, PR in the nuclear fraction consisted of complexes containing hsp90, p23, and FKBP51 as well as PR that was dimerized and highly phosphorylated. Hormone treatment significantly reduced the formation of all PR-chaperone complexes. The hsp90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, similarly blocked transcriptional activity of both functionally distinct receptors. However, the two forms of the PR differed in their ability to associate with the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter in organized chromatin. These findings provide new information about the composition and distribution of mature progesterone receptor complexes in mammary adenocarcinoma cells, and suggest that differences in receptor subcellular distribution have a significant impact on their function. These findings also reveal that transiently expressed steroid receptors may not always be processed like their endogenous counterparts.

Structure of the large FK506-binding protein FKBP51, an Hsp90-binding protein and a component of steroid receptor complexes.

The ability to bind immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporin and FK506 defines the immunophilin family of proteins, and the FK506-binding proteins form the FKBP subfamily of immunophilins. Some FKBPs, notably FKBP12 (the 12-kDa FK506-binding protein), have defined roles in regulating ion channels or cell signaling, and well established structures. Other FKBPs, especially the larger ones, participate in important biological processes, but their exact roles and the structural bases for these roles are poorly defined. FKBP51 (the 51-kDa FKBP) associates with heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and appears in functionally mature steroid receptor complexes. In New World monkeys, FKBP51 has been implicated in cortisol resistance. We report here the x-ray structures of human FKBP51, to 2.7 A, and squirrel monkey FKBP51, to 2.8 A, by using multiwavelength anomalous dispersion phasing. FKBP51 is composed of three domains: two consecutive FKBP domains and a three-unit repeat of the TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) domain. This structure of a multi-FKBP domain protein clarifies the arrangement of these domains and their possible interactions with other proteins. The two FKBP domains differ by an insertion in the second that affects the formation of the progesterone receptor complex.

Correlation among agonist dose, rate of import, and transcriptional activity of liganded progesterone receptor B isoform in living cells.

To determine the correlation among progesterone dose, rate of import of progesterone-occupied progesterone receptor (PR) complexes into the nucleus of cells, and transcriptional activity of progesterone-PR complexes. Live cell imaging and time-lapse microscopy of green fluorescent protein-tagged PR were performed to measure the rate of import into the nucleus of progesterone-PR complexes. To measure transcriptional activity, a progesterone-PR-sensitive luciferase reporter gene assay was used. For low doses of progesterone, there was a correlation among dose, import into the nucleus, and transcriptional activity. At higher doses of progesterone (beyond 12.5 nM), transcriptional activity increased, but there was no further increase in the rate of import, indicating a saturation of the import machinery. In both cases, a simple one-compartment model was sufficient to describe the import data. At low doses, progesterone dose correlates well with rate of import and transcriptional activity. At high doses, more progesterone can get into the nucleus and can activate unoccupied receptors already in the nucleus, leading to higher transactivation than would be expected from rates of import of progesterone-PR complexes into the nucleus.