Profitability Of Domestic Banks Research Articles

PROFIT MANAGEMENT ASPECTS OF UKRAINIAN BANKS IN FINANCIAL UNCERTAINTY

In this article, we single out the main characteristics of the bank's profit and examine its constitutive elements as well as its sources of formation. It’s pointed out that profit management plays a key role if a bank is to operate successfully. We also suggest our definition of profit management in banking, its purpose, and its main objectives . The article provides a detailed analysis of the financial performance of Ukrainian banks in 2020-2022 and identifies the main factors that negatively affected the amount of profit in 2022. The main factor behind the decline in the profitability of domestic banks was a significant increase in provisions for losses incurred and expected because of the war. Despite the hardships of the war, the banking sector remains operationally efficient and continues to be profitable. The article states that under the current circumstances, it is rather difficult for banks to increase their activities, so the main factor in a bank’s profitability is cost reduction. However, the results of the analysis showed that in 2020-2022, revenues consistently exceeded expenses and during this period we noticed steady growth in bank revenues. The article analyzes the main indicators of profitability of the banking sector of Ukraine in 2020-2022. The main trends that have occurred over the past three years in the domestic financial market have both directly and indirectly affected the financial results of the Ukrainian banking system.

The Effect Of Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loan To Deposit Ratio on Banking Profitability

The objective of this research is to analyses the influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Size, Operations Expenses to Operations Income (BOPO), toward Profitability of Domestic Banks and Foreign Banks in January 2003 until December 2007. This research also used Chow Test to analyses the influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Size, Operations Expenses to Operations Income (BOPO), toward Profitability between State Owned Banks and Foreign Banks. This research used time series data from Bank Indonesia’s three-monthly domestic Banks and Foreign Banks published financial reports. After passed the purposive sampling phase, the number of valid samples is 10 Domestic Banks and 10 Foreign Banks. This research used multiple regression analysis to analyses the data. This research also used Chow Test to analyses the influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Size, Operations Expenses to Operations Income (BOPO), toward Profitability between Domestic Banks and Foreign Banks. Empirical evidence shows that Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) has a positive and significant influence toward profitability in State Owned Banks. And only Size has positive and significant influenced toward profitability in foreign bank. The result of this research shows that adjusted R2 from Domestic Banks is 90,2% and Foreign Banks is 45,1%. F test shows that in simultant, Domestic Banks, Foreign Banks, variable independent influence variable dependent. Chow Test result shows influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Size, Operations Expenses to Operations Income (BOPO) toward Profitability between Domestic Banks and Foreign Banks. This research result can be consideration for investor in invested whether domestic bank and foreign bank. Existence global competition that always change caused domestic bank and foreign bank must follow the flow of global competition changing to maintain survive, with this competition then needed for future research

Bank Ownership and Performance

This paper builds a new dataset on bank ownership and bank performance covering approximately 50,000 observations for 119 countries over the 1995-2002 period. The paper then uses the dataset to reassess the relationship between bank ownership and bank performance, providing separated estimations for developing and industrial countries. It is found that, while ownership is strongly correlated with performance in developing countries, that ownership is not correlated with performance in industrial countries. In particular, the paper suggests that state-owned banks operating in developing countries tend to have lower profitability and higher costs than their private counterparts, and that the opposite is true for foreign-owned banks (which tend to be characterized by higher profitability and lower costs). We also find that, in developing countries, the entry of foreign banks plays a useful role by making domestic banks more efficient in terms of overhead cost and spreads, although we do not find any effect on profitability of domestic banks.

The impact of foreign capital on the Chinese banking market

In China, the foreign capital share of banks was restricted to 25% until 2006. Does such a relatively low share of foreign capital have any impact on the banking sector? In this paper, we use panel data on 19 major banks during 1996–2004 to shed light on the impact of foreign capital participation on the Chinese banking industry. We find that although the operating performance of foreign-owned banks is basically worse than that of domestic banks, as the market share of foreign-owned banks rises, they improve. For domestic banks, non-interest income decreases, while interest income increases. Therefore, the net effect of the foreign-owned banks' share on the profitability of domestic banks is small.

How Does Foreign Entry Affect the Domestic Banking Market? The Brazilian Case

ABSTRACT Using bank level data for Brazil in the 1995–2001 period, this paper examines the extent of foreign ownership in the domestic banking market. It also separates and analyses the domestic banking system as to private and state-owned institutions, given the almost 50% market share of state-owned banks in Brazil by the deposit criteria. The net interest margins, overhead, taxes paid, and profitability of foreign and domestic banks are compared with domestic banks achieving higher profits than foreign banks, which contradicts the empirical evidence in the literature. Also, further estimation results suggest that an increase in the share of foreign banks leads to higher profitability of domestic banks, which is opposed to the literature. Finally, while domestic private banks have higher net interest margins and profits than foreign banks, state-owned banks have lower net interest margin and profits, and higher overhead expenses than foreign banks. RESUMEN. Con base en datos bancarios brasileños del período 1995–2001, este documento examina la extensión de la titularidad extranjera en el mercado de la banca doméstica. También separa y analiza el sistema de la banca doméstica en instituciones privadas e instituciones estatales, con base en la participación superior al 50% del mercado de los bancos estatales en el Brasil, en lo que se refiere al volumen de los depósitos. Se han comparado los márgenes del interés neto, gastos generales, intereses pagados y rentabilidad de los bancos extranjeros y domésticos, llegando a la conclusión que los bancos domésticos alcanzaron mayores niveles de rentabilidad que los bancos extranjeros, lo que–empíricamente hablando–contradice la evidencia de la literatura. Además, otros resultados de las proyecciones realizadas sugieren que un aumento en la participación de los principales bancos extranjeros redundará en la mayor rentabilidad de los bancos domésticos, lo que también es contrario a lo expresado en la literatura. Finalmente, mientras que la banca doméstica privada tiene mayores márgenes de interés netos y rentabilidad que los bancos extranjeros, los bancos estatales tienen un margen neto y una rentabilidad menores y mayores gastos generales que los bancos extranjeros. RESUMO. Utilizando dados bancários do Brasil, no período de 1995 a 2001, este artigo analisa a extensão da propriedade estrangeira no mercado bancário nacional. Além disso, examina o sistema bancário nacional e distingue entre instituições privadas e públicas, considerando-se a parcela de quase 50% do mercado de bancos estatais, no Brasil, segundo o critério de depósitos. Comparam-se as margens de intermediação financeira, as despesas administrativas, os impostos pagos e a rentabilidade de bancos estrangeiros e nacionais, sendo que os bancos nacionais alcançam lucros mais altos do que os bancos estrangeiros, contradizendo a evidência empírica apresentada pela literatura. Além disso, outros resultados avaliados sugerem que um aumento da participação de bancos estrangeiros acarreta maior rentabilidade para os bancos nacionais, contrariando a literatura. Finalmente, enquanto os bancos privados nacionais apresentam margens líquidas de juros e de lucros mais elevadas do que os bancos estrangeiros, os bancos estatais apresentam margens de intermediação financeira e de lucros mais baixas e despesas administrativas mais altas do que os bancos estrangeiros.