Proficient Mismatch Repair Tumors Research Articles

Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with chemotherapy for treating previously treated advanced endometrial cancer in Sweden

Objective Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was recently approved for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with disease progression on or following prior treatment with a platinum‑containing therapy in any setting, and who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation (KEYNOTE-775/Study-309; NCT03517449). The objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with chemotherapy from a Swedish healthcare perspective. Materials and methods A lifetime partitioned-survival model with three health states (progression free, progressed disease, death) was constructed. Chemotherapy was represented by paclitaxel or doxorubicin. Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, and utility data were obtained from KEYNOTE-775 (database lock: March 1, 2022). Costs (in 2020 Swedish Krona [SEK]) included drug acquisition and administration, health state, end of life, adverse event management, subsequent treatment, and societal (scenario analysis). Outcomes were calculated as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years. Model results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for all-comers, patients with proficient mismatch repair tumors, and deficient mismatch repair tumors. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is a cost-effective treatment when compared with chemotherapy, with estimated deterministic and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of SEK 795,712 and 819,757 per QALY gained. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was associated with a large incremental QALY and life-year gain per person versus chemotherapy over the model time horizon (1.49 and 1.76). Limitations Time-to-event data were incomplete and semiparametric and parametric curves were utilized for lifetime extrapolation. Willingness-to-pay thresholds, costs, and utility weights vary by country, which would vary the treatment’s cost effectiveness in different countries. Conclusions This partitioned survival analysis suggests that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is cost effective compared with chemotherapy in Sweden for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma following previous systemic therapy. Results were robust to mismatch repair status and to changes in parameters/assumptions.

Genomic alteration in sporadic adolescent and young adult-onset colorectal adenocarcinoma.

154 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increasing in adults younger than 50 years. This study evaluated genomic alteration in adolescent and young adult (AYA)-onset sporadic CRC patients who aged between 15 and 39 years. Methods: DNA from 90 archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples that histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with proficient mismatch repair tumors at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) were extracted. Patients who clinically suspected familial adenomatous polyposis were excluded. Gene mutational analysis was performed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using an Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and compared with previous reported molecular data in adult-onset CRC from our group. Results: The top 5 mutations frequency observed were TP53, KRAS, FBXW7, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutations which were comparable to what reported in adult-onset CRC. However, FBXW7, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, FGFR3, ERBB2, and PTEN were reported more frequent in AYA group. No difference in number of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations among 2 groups. Table below shows key cancer genes mutation frequencies. Conclusions: This study is the comprehensive report hotspot mutations using NGS in sporadic AYA-onset sporadic CRC patients. The most commonly identified gene mutation frequencies among AYA-onset were similar to those reported in adult-onset, except for FBXW7, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, FGFR3, ERBB2, and PTEN mutations that had a slightly higher frequency. Further studies on larger sample set for genetic and epigenetic landscape are required. [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant intratumoral influenza vaccine treatment in patients with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer leads to increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ T cells and upregulation of PD-L1: a phase 1/2 clinical trial

BackgroundIn colorectal cancer, the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are mostly limited to patients with deficient mismatch repair tumors, characterized by a high grade infiltration of CD8+T cells. Interventions aimed...

Interim result of phase II, prospective, single-arm trial of long-course chemoradiotherapy combined with concurrent tislelizumab in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, with modest benefits on tumor regression and survival. Since chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been reported to have synergic effects. This study aims to explore the safety and efficacy of long-course chemoradiotherapy combined with concurrent tislelizumab as a neoadjuvant treatment regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This manuscript reported the interim result of a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial. Patients with mid-to-low locally advanced rectal cancer with clinical stages of cT3-4a N0M0 or cT1-4a N1-2M0 were included. The patients received long-course radiotherapy (50 Gy/25 f, 2 Gy/f, 5 days/week) and three 21-day cycles of capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, bid, day1-14) plus concurrent three 21-day cycles of tislelizumab (200 mg, day8), followed by a radical surgery 6-8 weeks after radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate. (Clinical trial number: NCT04911517). A total of 26 patients completed the treatment protocol between April 2021 and June 2022. All patients completed chemoradiotherapy, 24 patients received three cycles of tislelizumab, and 2 patients received two cycles. The pathological complete remission (ypT0N0) was achieved in 50% (13/26) of the patients with all proficient mismatch repair tumors. The immune-related adverse event occurred in 19.2% (5/26) of patients. Patients with no CEA elevation or age less than 50 were more likely to benefit from this treatment regimen. Long-course chemoradiotherapy combined with concurrent tislelizumab in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer had favorable safety and efficacy, and does not increase the complication rate of surgery. Further study is needed to confirm these results.

Assessment of Capecitabine and Bevacizumab With or Without Atezolizumab for the Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cotargeting vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 may produce anticancer activity in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The clinical benefit of atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab remains unclear for the treatment of mCRC. To assess whether the addition of atezolizumab to capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with refractory mCRC and to perform exploratory analyses among patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease and liver metastasis. This double-blind phase 2 randomized clinical trial enrolled 133 patients between September 25, 2017, and June 28, 2018 (median duration of follow-up for PFS, 20.9 months), with data cutoff on May 4, 2020. The study was conducted at multiple centers through the Academic and Community Cancer Research United network. Adult patients with mCRC who experienced disease progression while receiving fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy (if the patient had a RAS wild-type tumor) were included. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive capecitabine (850 or 1000 mg/m2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) on day 1 plus either atezolizumab (1200 mg; investigational group) or placebo (placebo group) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was PFS; 110 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 with 80% power (1-sided α = .10). Secondary end points were objective response rate, overall survival (OS), and toxic effects. Of 133 randomized patients, 128 individuals (median age, 58.0 years [IQR, 51.0-65.0 years]; 77 men [60.2%]) were assessed for efficacy (82 in the investigational group and 46 in the placebo group). Overall, 15 patients (11.7%) self-identified as African American or Black, 8 (6.3%) as Asian, 1 (0.8%) as Pacific Islander, 101 (78.9%) as White, 1 (0.8%) as multiple races (Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and White), and 2 (1.6%) as unknown race or unsure of race. Microsatellite-stable disease was present in 110 patients (69 in the investigational group and 41 in the placebo group). Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-6.4 months) in the investigational group and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.2 months) in the placebo group (1-sided log-rank P = .07, a statistically significant result; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.52-1.09). Among patients with MSS and proficient mismatch repair, the HR for PFS was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events in the investigational vs placebo groups were hypertension (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]), diarrhea (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]), and hand-foot syndrome (6 patients [7.0%] vs 2 patients [4.3%]). One treatment-related death occurred in the investigational group. In the investigational group, the response rate was higher among patients without liver metastasis (3 of 13 individuals [23.1%]) vs with liver metastasis (4 of 69 individuals [5.8%]). The benefit of atezolizumab for PFS and OS was greater among patients without vs with liver metastasis (primary analysis of PFS: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.27-1.47] vs 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51-1.17]; OS: HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-1.02] vs 1.14 [95% CI, 0.72-1.81]). In this randomized clinical trial, the addition of atezolizumab to capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy provided limited (ie, not clinically meaningful) clinical benefit. Patients with MSS and proficient mismatch repair tumors and those without liver metastasis benefited more from dual inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor and programmed cell death 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 pathways. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02873195.

Prognostic Value and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Patients with Stage II and III Colorectal Carcinoma-A Single-Center Study.

Background and objectives: Deficient mismatch repair (MMR) status is associated with good prognosis but poor therapeutic response to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer. However, there are some opposed arguments considering therapeutic outcomes in patients with evidenced MMR deficiency in colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was the investigation of prognostic value and immunohistochemical analysis of the MMR-deficiency tumors. Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 104 patients with resected stage II and III colorectal cancer samples from the period 2018–2019. Results: The tumors with deficient MMR status were significantly associated with age up to 50 years and right-sided localization (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period of 22.43 ± 6.66 months, 21 patients (20.2%) died, whereas 14 patients (13.5%) had relapses. The loss of mutL homologue 1/postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (MLH1/PMS2) expression, compared to proficient MMR tumors, was associated with shorter disease-free survival in patients with lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.05), perineural invasion (p < 0.01), stage III (p < 0.05) and high-grade tumor (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This retrospective pilot study of a single-center cohort of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer highlights the clinical importance of using immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis as a guide for diagnostic algorithm in a country with limited resources, but with a high prevalence of colorectal carcinoma in the young patients. MMR-deficiency tumors compared with proficient MMR colorectal cancer was not shown to be a significant predictor of disease-free and overall survival.

Characteristics of BRAFV600E Mutant, Deficient Mismatch Repair/Proficient Mismatch Repair, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Series of 287 Patients.

BRAFV600E mutations occurring in about 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) are usually associated with a poor outcome. However, their prognostic factors are unknown. We built a multicenter clinico-biological database gathering data from patients with BRAFV600E -mutant mCRC treated in one of the 16 French centers from 2006 to 2017. The primary endpoint was to identify prognostic factors using a Cox model. We included 287 patients (median age, 67 years [28-95]; female, 57%). Their median overall survival was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.97-27.04), and median progression-free survival in the first-line setting was 4.34 months (95% CI, 3.81-5.03). Chemotherapy regimen and biological agents (antiangiogenic or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor) were not associated with overall and progression-free survival. Stage IV disease (synchronous metastases) and absence of curative-intent surgery were statistically associated with poor overall survival. Among the 194 patients with mismatch repair (MMR) status available, overall survival was significantly longer in patients with deficient MMR tumors compared with those with proficient MMR tumors (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.56; p = .009). Despite that BRAFV600E -mutant mCRCs are associated with poor overall and progression-free-survival, patients with deficient MMR tumors and/or resectable disease experienced a longer survival. These results highlight the importance of MMR testing and resectability discussion in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC in day-to-day practice. Mismatch repair (MMR) testing and resectability discussion in patients with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) should be performed in day-to-day practice to steer treatment decision making in patients with BRAFV600E -mutant mCRC.

Mismatch repair status as a beneficial predictor of fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

BackgroundPrior studies have indicated that patients with colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair have particular clinicopathologic features that distinguish them from patients with tumors with proficient mismatch repair. However, the effect of the mismatch repair status on outcomes after adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is still unknown. MethodsPancreatic cancer patients who underwent R0 resection between January 2013 and December 2015 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were included in this study. Mismatch repair status was determined by immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair proteins. Prognostic factors for deficient mismatch repair and proficient mismatch repair tumors were analyzed using Cox models. ResultsIn total, 442 of 590 patients met the inclusion criteria, and their mismatch repair status was determined; the study group consisted of 75 patients with deficient mismatch repair and 367 patients with proficient mismatch repair. Among the 147 patients who underwent surgery alone, patients with deficient mismatch repair tumors had a better overall survival than patients with proficient mismatch repair tumors (hazard ratio = 0.555 [95% confidence interval 0.331–0.931]; P = .026). Compared with patients who underwent surgery, 161 patients who received gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy had improvements in both disease-free survival and overall survival, regardless of mismatch repair status. However, 5-fluorouracil–based adjuvant chemotherapy yielded a favorable disease-free survival in the proficient mismatch repair group but conferred no survival advantage in the deficient mismatch repair group (hazard ratio = 0.930 [95% confidence interval 0.497–1.743]; P = .821). ConclusionMismatch repair status in pancreatic cancer patients is not only a prognostic indicator but also a potential guiding factor for the use of 5-fluorouracil–based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Randomized trial of FOLFOX alone or combined with atezolizumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer and deficient DNA mismatch repair or microsatellite instability (ATOMIC, Alliance A021502).

TPS3630 Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer with deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR), anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy produced high tumor response rates and extended progression-free survival compared to lack of benefit for proficient MMR tumors (Le, M, et al, NEJM 2016). We propose a phase III randomized trial to determine if the addition of the anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab (Genentech™), to adjuvant FOLFOX can improve patient disease-free survival (DFS) vs FOLFOX alone in patients with stage III colon cancers with dMMR or microsatellite instability (MSI). By blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, atezolizumab may activate T cells, thereby, restoring their ability to detect and attack tumor cells. Limited data suggest that FOLFOX may increase intratumoral cytotoxic CD8+ T cells that may serve as ‘immune priming.’ Methods: Patients with curatively resected stage III colon carcinomas with evidence of dMMR or MSI will be randomized to modified FOLFOX6 for 6 months (12 cycles) alone or combined with atezolizumab (840 mg IV q2 wk) continued as monotherapy for an additional 6 months (total duration of 12 months). Patients will be stratified by T, N stage and tumor sidedness. Local testing for MSI or MMR proteins is allowed. Atezolizumab must begin by/with cycle 2. The targeted accrual goal of 700 patients provides 90% power to detect an effect size expressed as hazard ratio of 0.6 for the primary endpoint DFS at two-sided alpha of 0.05. Interim analyses are planned at 50% and 75% of events. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, treatment tolerability, and quality of life. This study will be conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. The protocol has been approved by NCI CTEP and is expected to be activated in mid 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT02912559.

Therapeutic implications of DNA mismatch repair in adjuvant colorectal cancer chemotherapy

SUMMARY Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a molecular marker of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and constitutes an important oncogenic molecular pathway in colorectal cancer that is present in approximately 12–15% of all colorectal malignant tumors. Defective MMR status in colorectal cancer occurs as a result of germline mutations in MMR genes (less than one third of cases) or, more commonly, from somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter (more than two thirds). MMR deficiency accelerates colorectal oncogenesis by accumulation of secondary mutations in specific target genes. Patients with defective MMR tumors have distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and have been associated with a better stage-adjusted prognosis than patients with proficient MMR tumors. MMR deficiency may predict tumor chemoresistance to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil treatment. Preliminary clinical data suggested that adding oxaliplatin to 5-fluorouracil could restore the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in MSI patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the differential chemosensitivity of MSI patients depending on the mechanism of MMR deficiency and the adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen used.

Defective Mismatch Repair Status as a Prognostic Biomarker of Disease-Free Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy

Adding oxaliplatin to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy improves 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) after resection of stage III colon cancer. Several studies suggest that patients with tumors exhibiting defective mismatch repair (MMR) do not benefit from adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy, but there are few data on 5-FU-oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of MMR status for DFS in patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. MMR status was determined by microsatellite instability testing or immunohistochemistry in 303 unselected patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy in 9 centers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between MMR status and 3-year DFS. The 3-year DFS rate was significantly higher in the 34 patients (11.2% of the study population) with defective MMR tumors (90.5%) than in patients with proficient MMR tumors (73.8%; log-rank test; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.09-4.27; P = 0.027). In multivariate analysis, MMR status remained an independent significant prognostic factor for DFS (HR = 4.48; 95% CI, 1.34-14.99; P = 0.015). MMR status is an independent prognostic biomarker for DFS in patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy.