ON the 3rd inst., at a meeting of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, the President, Professor Kelland, in presenting the Keith Medal which had been awarded by the Council to Professor Heddle, of St. Andrews, delivered the following address:—“Professor Heddle—I am here to-night to exemplify a remark which is often made, that to insure success in an address, such as I am about to deliver, the best way is to commit the charge of it to one absolutely ignorant of the subject. No false pride will then stand in the way of the best sources of information, nor will any undue admixture of half knowledge clog and darken the truth. For every particular contained in these remarks, then, I at once unhesitatingly acknowledge myself indebted to Professor Geikie. When I first became acquainted with this Society, forty years ago, there used to frequent our meetings men who had the reputation of being mineralogists rather than geologists—Lord Greenock, Allan, and perhaps Jameson himself. That race has now died out, and with them mineralogy, as a distinct science, has all but lain dormant amongst us. During the preceding quarter of a century that science had flourished nowhere more vigorously than in Edinburgh. Professor Jameson introduced the definiteness of system of the Freyberg School, and infused into his pupils such a love of minerals that numerous private cabinets were formed; while under his fostering care the University Museum grew into a large and admirable series. One of my first acts as Professor in the University was to vote out of the Reid Fund, which had just come into our hands, a large sum (some thousands) to pay back moneys expended on minerals throughout a series of years preceding. During these years, Geology, as the science is now understood, hardly existed. For, as the nature and importance of the organic remains embedded in rocks became recognised, their enormous value in the elucidation of geological problems gradually drew observers away from the study of minerals. Consequently, as Palæontology increased, Mineralogy waned among us. To such an extent was the study of minerals neglected, that geologists, even of high reputation, could not distinguish many ordinary varieties. But, as a knowledge of rocks presupposes an acquaintance more or less extensive with minerals, the neglect of mineralogy reacted most disadvantageously on that domain of geology which deals with the composition and structure of rocks. The nomenclature of the rocks of Britain sank into a state of confusion, from which it is now only beginning to recover. To you, Professor Heddle, belongs the merit of having almost alone upheld the mineralogical reputation of your native country during these long years of depression. You have devoted your life to the study, and have made more analyses of minerals than any other observer in Britain. You have not contented yourself with determining their composition and their names; you have gone into almost every parish in the more mountainous regions, have searched them out in their native localities, and, by this means, have studied their geological relations, treasuring up evidences from which to reason regarding their origin and history. After thirty years of continuous work, you have communicated the results of your labours to this Society. For the first two of these papers on the Rhombohedral Carbonates and on the Feldspars, in which you have greatly extended our knowledge of pseudomorphic change among minerals, enunciating a law of the shrinkage so frequently resulting therefrom, the Society proposes now to express its gratitude to you. The value of your papers is undoubted. Through the kindness of Mr. Milne Home, I have been favoured with the sight of letters addressed to you by four eminent mineralogists, Dana of America, Rammelsberg of Berlin, Szabo of Buda-Pesth, and King of Queen's College, Galway. Szabo states that the notice of your paper on the Feldspars, which appeared in Groth's Zeitschrift für Mineralogie, greatly interests him, and makes him desirous of placing himself in direct communication with the author. Dana says, ‘I have read your paper on the Feldspars, in the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, with great satisfaction. Your thorough method of work leads towards important results of great geological, as well as mineralogical value.’
Read full abstract