Professional Society Guidelines Research Articles

Growth charts for use at birth and in the neonatal period: Recommendations of the French Neonatal Society.

The use of different growth charts can lead to confusion in discussions between professionals. There are obstetric charts (of fetal growth) and neonatal charts (of measurements at birth and of postnatal growth). These charts can be descriptive (derived from an unselected population) or prescriptive (derived from of a population at low risk and with optimal conditions for growth). (1) To describe available charts for infants at birth and in the neonatal period and compare them, and (2) to recommend one or more charts for use in neonatology in France. Bibliographic research was conducted on MEDLINE and completed by the guidelines of professional societies. Antenatal information about fetal growth restriction (FGR) or fetuses identified as small-for-gestational-age using Intrauterine charts must be integrated into the identification of newborns at risk, but the use of Intrauterine charts to evaluate birthweight is not recommended to allow consistency with postnatal charts used in neonatal practice. Z-score variations using the updated Fenton postnatal charts are the most appropriate for the assessment of birthweight and postnatal growth for infants born preterm. These charts are sex-specific, include the three measurements (length, weight, and head circumference) and enable longitudinal follow-up of growth up to 50 weeks of corrected age and are linked to the WHO charts at term. The French Audipog charts, although are individualized, accessible online and can be used in maternity units to evaluate birthweight for term infants, but do not allow the follow-up of postnatal growth, while Fenton charts may be used to evaluate birthweight and postnatal growth in the first month for hospitalized term infants. The updated Fenton charts are the neonatal charts that best suit the objectives of pediatricians in France for monitoring the growth of preterm newborns. The use of the Audipog charts at term remains an alternative in maternity wards, while Fenton charts can be used for hospitalized term newborns.

Reimagining Colorectal Cancer Screening: Innovations and Challenges with Dr. Aasma Shaukat.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) currently ranks as the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, posing a significant global health burden to the population. Recent studies have reported the emergence of a new clinical picture of the disease, with a notable increase in CRC rates in younger populations of <50 years of age. The American Cancer Society (ACS) now recommends CRC screening starting at age 45 for average-risk individuals. Dr. Aasma Shaukat's Keynote Conference highlights the critical need for updated screening strategies, with an emphasis on addressing the suboptimal adherence rates and the effective management of the growing burden of CRC. Lowering the adenoma detection screening age can facilitate early identification of adenomas in younger asymptomatic patients, altering the epidemiologic landscape. However, its implications may not be as profound unless a drastic shift in the age distribution of CRC is observed. Currently, various screening options are available in practice, including stool-based tests like multitarget stool DNA (mtDNA) tests, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and imaging-based tests. In addition to existing screening methods, blood-based tests are now emerging as promising tools for early CRC detection. These tests leverage innovative techniques along with AI and machine learning algorithms, aiding in tumor detection at a significantly earlier stage, which was not possible before. Medicare mandates specific criteria for national coverage of blood-based tests, including sensitivity ≥ 74%, specificity ≥ 90%, FDA approval, and inclusion in professional society guidelines. Ongoing clinical trials, such as Freenome, Guardant, and CancerSEEK, offer hope for further advancements in blood-based CRC screening. The development of multicancer early detection tests like GRAIL demonstrates a tremendous potential for detecting various solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Despite these breakthroughs, the question of accessibility and affordability still stands. The ever-evolving landscape of CRC screening reflects the strength of the scientific field in light of an altered disease epidemiology. Lowering screening age along with the integration of blood-based tests with existing screening methods holds great potential in reducing the CRC-related burden. At the same time, it is increasingly important to address the challenges of adaptation of the healthcare system to this change in the epidemiologic paradigm.

Preoperative evaluation of adult patients before elective, non-cardiothoracic surgery : A joint recommendation of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society for Surgery and the German Society for Internal Medicine

The 70recommendations summarize the current status of preoperative risk evaluation of adult patients prior to elective non-cardiothoracic surgery. Based on the joint publications of the German scientific societies for anesthesiology and intensive care medicine (DGAI), surgery (DGCH), and internal medicine (DGIM), which were first published in 2010 and updated in 2017, as well as the European guideline on preoperative cardiac risk evaluation published in 2022, acomprehensive re-evaluation of the recommendation takes place, taking into account new findings, the current literature, and current guidelines of international professional societies. The revised multidisciplinary recommendation is intended to facilitate astructured and common approach to the preoperative evaluation of patients. The aim is to ensure individualized preparation for the patient prior to surgery and thus to increase patient safety. Taking into account intervention- and patient-specific factors, which are indispensable in the preoperative risk evaluation, the perioperative risk for the patient should be minimized and safety increased. The recommendations for action are summarized under "General Principles(A)," "Advanced Diagnostics(B)," and the "Preoperative Management of Continuous Medication(C)." For the first time, arating of the individual measures with regard to their clinical relevance has been given in the present recommendation. Ajoint and transparent agreement is intended to ensure ahigh level of patient orientation while avoiding unnecessary preliminary examinations, to shorten preoperative examination procedures, and ultimately to save costs. The joint recommendation of DGAI, DGCH and DGIM reflects the current state of knowledge as well as the opinion of experts. The recommendation does not replace the individualized decision between patient and physician about the best preoperative strategy and treatment.

Practice Patterns and Barriers to Vascular Genetic Testing Among Vascular Surgeons

Engaging patients living with or at risk of aortic dissection via the Aortic Dissection Collaborative, physician education in vascular genetics was identified as a research priority. We surveyed vascular surgeons to characterize practice patterns, motivations, and barriers regarding aortopathy genetic testing. An anonymous 27-question survey was distributed on social media platforms between November and December 2022. Domains included demographics, vascular genetic education, testing attitudes and utilization, and experience in treating patients with genetic vascular aortopathies. The analysis included summary statistics and unpaired t-test to compare responses by interest in incorporating testing and practice type. A total of 171 vascular surgeons from 15 countries responded to the survey (23% trainees). Over half received vascular genetics education during training (59%), and most (86%) were interested in incorporating genetic testing into their practice. Academic surgeons were more likely to have cared for a patient with a known genetic aortopathy over the past year than surgeons in hospital-based and private practices (83% vs. 56% vs. 27%; P<0.01), to have ever made a referral to a medical geneticist (78% vs. 51% vs. 9%; P<0.01), and have access to genetic counselors or geneticists (66% vs. 46% vs. 0%; P<0.01). Barriers to genetic testing were rated as more significant by surgeons in nonacademic practices, with top barriers being insurance coverage of testing, cost of genetic testing, and access to genetic counselors. Evidence-based professional society guidelines were the strongest rated motivating factor for testing incorporation among respondents. Vascular surgeon attitudes are not major barriers to incorporating genetic testing for patients with aortopathies; however, practical challenges regarding genetic testing and counseling are barriers to implementation especially for vascular surgeons in nonacademic practices. Future efforts should focus on evidence-based society guidelines, continuing medical education to increase adoption, and facilitating access to genetic counseling.

ChatGPT accurately performs genetic counseling for gynecologic cancers

ObjectiveArtificial Intelligence (AI) systems such as ChatGPT can take medical examinations and counsel patients regarding medical diagnosis. We aim to quantify the accuracy of the ChatGPT V3.4 in answering commonly asked questions pertaining to genetic testing and counseling for gynecologic cancers. MethodsForty questions were formulated in conjunction with gynecologic oncologists and adapted from professional society guidelines and ChatGPT version 3.5 was queried, the version that is readily available to the public. The two categories of questions were genetic counseling guidelines and questions pertaining to specific genetic disorders. The answers were scored by two attending Gynecologic Oncologists according to the following scale: 1) correct and comprehensive, 2) correct but not comprehensive, 3) some correct, some incorrect, and 4) completely incorrect. Scoring discrepancies were resolved by additional third reviewer. The proportion of responses earning each score were calculated overall and within each question category. ResultsChatGPT provided correct and comprehensive answers to 33/40 (82.5%) questions, correct but not comprehensive answers to 6/40 (15%) questions, partially incorrect answers to 1/40 (2.5%) questions, and completely incorrect answers to 0/40 (0%) questions. The genetic counseling category of questions had the highest proportion of answers that were both correct and comprehensive with ChatGPT answering all 20/20 questions with 100% accuracy and were comprehensive in responses. ChatGPT performed equally in the specific genetic disorders category, with 88.2% (15/17) and 66.6% (2/3) correct and comprehensive answers to questions pertaining to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome questions respectively. ConclusionChatGPT accurately answers questions about genetic syndromes, genetic testing, and counseling in majority of the studied questions. These data suggest this powerful tool can be utilized as a patient resource for genetic counseling questions, though more data input from gynecologic oncologists would be needed to educate patients on genetic syndromes.

Development of an Empowering Language Assessment Tool for Type 1 Diabetes

Introduction: This brief report describes the early development of an Empowering Language Assessment Tool (T1D-ELAT) for patient education materials (PEMs) designed for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), consisting of a checklist to assess the frequency of disempowering language. Methods: The authors followed professional society guidelines to develop a checklist to quantify the use of disempowering words and phrases. We determined inclusion and exclusion criteria and grouped checklist terms into functional categories. We also collected descriptive characteristics about each PEM, such as publication date, authorship, and country of origin, and created a codebook defining these terms and descriptive characteristics. Results: The authors tested the checklist in two rounds and added nine term variations as a result. We removed the imperative can/can’t/cannot during testing because it was not consistently used as an imperative. Discussion: Pilot testing the checklist informed revisions to the checklist and study protocol. Future phases of this research project will also explore the context in which disempowering terms are used in these materials.

Introducing a Comprehensive Score of Systemic Anticancer Treatment Relevance.

Treatment patterns in systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) are extremely varied and complex. While professional society guidelines exist that suggest recommended treatment strategies, these guidelines are produced through an extremely laborious and sometimes opaque manual process, making it impossible for such guidelines to cover all relevant treatment scenarios. To complement these manually curated guidelines, we leveraged a database of 5818 clinical trials and 7012 supporting references from 1943-present to calculate a quantifiable "relevance score". In a pilot evaluation, this score was strongly associated with professional society guideline recommendations, while also providing relevance information on thousands of additional therapies. We show that this score also accurately illustrates trends in SACT adoption over time. We foresee that this score, which comprehensively evaluates the relevance of SACT overall and by cancer subtype, will have utility for clinical practitioners as well as researchers in real-world data.

Emerging Role of Scintigraphy Using Bone-Seeking Tracers for Diagnosis of Cardiac Amyloidosis: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Amyloidoses are a complex group of clinical diseases that result from progressive organ dysfunction due to extracellular protein misfolding and deposition. The two most common types of cardiac amyloidosis are transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Diagnosis of ATTR cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is challenging owing to its phenotypic similarity to other more common cardiac conditions, the perceived rarity of the disease, and unfamiliarity with its diagnostic algorithms; endomyocardial biopsy was historically required for diagnosis. However, myocardial scintigraphy using bone-seeking tracers has shown high accuracy for detection of ATTR-CM and has become a key noninvasive diagnostic test for the condition, receiving support from professional society guidelines and transforming prior diagnostic paradigms. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the role of myocardial scintigraphy using bone-seeking tracers in the diagnosis of ATTR-CM. The article summarizes available tracers, acquisition techniques, interpretation and reporting considerations, diagnostic pitfalls, and gaps in the current literature. The critical need for monoclonal testing of patients with positive scintigraphy results to differentiate ATTR-CM from AL cardiac amyloidosis is highlighted. Recent updates in guideline recommendations that emphasize the importance of a qualitative visual assessment are also discussed.

Abstract 16419: Assessing the Evidence Base of Cardiology-Specific Oncology Guideline Recommendations: Implications for Health Policy

Introduction: Oncology societies have been contributing guidelines/recommendations to the limited yet growing body of literature in cardio-oncology. Research Questions: What are the levels of evidence (LOE) and classes of recommendation (COR) for cardiology-specific recommendations produced by major oncology societies? Methods: We reviewed cardiology-specific recommendations published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Society of Hematology (ASoH), NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network), and European Society of Cardiology (ESC). LOE and COR were noted for each recommendation. Results: The US oncologic societies have made 81 cardiac-specific recommendations (ASCO: 54 (67%); ASoH: 14 (17%); NCCN; 13 (16%) (Tables 1-3). For ASCO, 26 (48%) were COR 1, 23 (43%) COR 2, and 5 (9%) COR 3 supported by LOE A (9%), LOE B (39%), and LOE C (52%). For ASoH, 1(8%) was COR 1, 11(85%) COR 2, and 1(8%) COR 3 supported by LOE B (7%), and LOE C (93%). NCCN made 13 COR 2 recommendations and did not provide LOE classification. The most common recommendations addressed baseline (20%) and serial (24%) assessment, specific imaging modalities (9%), chemotherapy dosing (19%), and radiation therapy (20%). Most recommendations were unique without discrepant statements, but there were some redundancies. ESC produced 271 cardio-oncology recommendations (155 COR 1; 111 COR 2; 5 COR-3) with 3% LOE A, 21% LOE B, and 76% LOE C. The major areas for ESC recommendations included baseline (18%) and serial (33%) assessment, and medications (29%). Conclusions: Oncology and cardiology professional society guidelines have provided 352 cardiac related recommendations in the setting of cancer treatment and 73% have the lowest LOE. In this developing field with a limited evidence base, close collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists will be required to provide a cohesive set of recommendations for the cardiac issues associated with cancer treatment.

SAT103 Strategies To Enhance Insulin Pump Backup Plan Delivery: A Quality Improvement Project

Abstract Disclosure: P. Krutilova: None. S. Blount: None. A. Carvalho: None. A. Cedeno: None. K. Jones: None. I. Malik: None. S.A. Maraqa: None. A. Markov: None. A. Martirossian: None. M.C. Petersen: None. R.L. Usala: None. N. Genere: Research Investigator; Self; Fractyl Laboratories. Background: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (“insulin pump”) use is associated with improved glycemic control, greater quality of life, and reduced hypoglycemic events. However, failure to properly identify and respond to insulin pump malfunction can cause adverse events, including diabetic ketoacidosis. Professional society guidelines recommend the use of insulin pump backup plans in the event of pump failure, but plan details are determined by individual clinicians and practices. We identified inconsistent implementation of insulin pump backup plans within our Diabetes Center and undertook a quality improvement project to (1) standardize backup plan documentation and (2) evaluate the extent to which these efforts improve patient confidence in their personalized backup plan. Methods: Retrospective review of the electronic medical record was performed to evaluate whether all necessary components of an insulin pump backup plan [abbreviated as “WIS”, including (1) Written backup plan with dosing, (2) intermediate or long-acting Insulin prescription, and (3) appropriate Supplies], were documented prior to the intervention. Clinician and patient surveys were completed to gather insights into existing backup plan practices. We then developed a ‘Backup Plan’ document with troubleshooting tips and patient-specific dosing of subcutaneous insulin. We assessed several interventions for increasing utilization of the ‘Backup Plan’ using surveys. Results: In a baseline assessment of 89 patients using insulin pumps, 53% had a documented backup plan and 33% had all WIS components. Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES) visits were the most common source of pump backup plan documentation and CDCES involvement in care was associated with higher likelihood of successful WIS components (53.3% vs. 11.4%, p &amp;lt;0.001). Yet, only 39% of patients had a CDCES visit within the past year. Of 20 patients surveyed, 85% reported confidence in using their backup plan, but only 50% were able to recall specific insulin dosing. Among several interventions, we found that only personalized training for clinicians improved implementation of the ‘Backup Plan’ document, and none of the interventions increased CDCES referral frequency. Barriers to CDCES visits included patient preference, scheduling constraints, and referral order complexity. Conclusion: We identified low rates of insulin pump backup plan documentation in our practice and identified CDCES engagement as a key factor for backup plan implementation. We developed standardized pump backup plan documentation and implemented it using personalized training of clinicians. In the future, we will pilot a multidisciplinary diabetes technology clinic with allocated time for both clinician and CDCES visits and evaluate frequency of successful pump backup plans through retrospective chart review and patient surveys. Presentation: Saturday, June 17, 2023

Low-Value Prostate Cancer Screening Among Young Men With Private Insurance.

No professional society guidelines recommend PSA screening in men younger than age 40; however, data suggest testing occurs at meaningful rates in this age group. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of PSA testing in men under 40. This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2017. Using the MarketScan database, rates of testing for the sum of the annual population of men at risk were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and statistical analyses were performed in men continuously enrolled in the database for at least 5 year. Results were stratified by receipt of PSA testing and by age group. The association of diagnoses and Charlson Comorbidity Index with receipt of PSA test was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. We identified 3,230,748 men ages 18 to 39 who were enrolled for at least 5 years. The rate of ever receiving PSA testing was 0.6%, 1.7%, 8.5%, and 9.1% in men less than 25, 25 to 29, 30 to 34, and 35 to 39 years, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression showed that relative to all men 18 to 39, patients who received PSA testing had higher odds of a diagnosis of hypogonadism (OR 11.77) or lower urinary tract symptoms (OR 4.19). This study found a remarkable number of young men receive PSA testing, with a strong association with diagnoses of lower urinary tract symptoms and hypogonadism. Clinicians need to be educated that assessment and management guidelines for other urologic diagnoses now defer PSA testing to prostate cancer screening guidelines.

Trends in use of antipsychotics and psychoactive drugs in older patients after major surgery.

Professional society guidelines recommend limiting the use of antipsychotics in older patients with postoperative delirium. How these recommendations affected the use of antipsychotics and other psychoactive drugs in the postoperative period has not been studied. This retrospective cohort study included patients 65 years or older without psychiatric diagnoses who underwent major surgery in community hospitals (CHs) and academic medical centers (AMCs) in the United States. The outcome was the rate of hospital days exposed to antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, benzodiazepines, hypnotics, and selective alpha-2 receptor agonist dexmedetomidine in the postoperative period by hospital type. The study included 4,098,431 surgical admissions from CHs (mean age 75.0 [standard deviation, 7.1] years; 50.8% female) during 2008-2018 and 2,310,529 surgical admissions from AMCs (75.0 [7.4] years; 49.4% female) during 2009-2018. In the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, the number of exposed days per 1000 hospital-days declined for haloperidol (CHs: 33-21 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 24-15 days [p < 0.01]) and benzodiazepines (CHs: 261-136 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 150-77 days [p < 0.01]). The use of atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and dexmedetomidine increased, while hypnotic use varied by the hospital type. In the non-ICU setting, the rate declined for haloperidol in CHs but not in AMCs (CHs: 10-6 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 4-3 days [p = 0.52]) and for benzodiazepines in both settings (CHs: 126-56 days [p < 0.01]; AMCs: 30-27 days [p < 0.01]). The use of antiepileptics and antidepressants increased, while the use of atypical antipsychotics and hypnotics varied by the hospital type. The use of haloperidol and benzodiazepines in the postoperative period declined at both CHs and AMCs. These trends coincided with the increasing use of other psychoactive drugs.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Outpatient Management of Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism From the Emergency Department.

Although recommended by professional society guidelines, outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) from emergency departments (EDs) in the US remains uncommon. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the outpatient management of PE from the ED using implementation science methodology. We conducted semistructured interviews with a purposeful sample of emergency physicians using maximum variation sampling, aiming to recruit physicians with diverse practice patterns regarding the management of low-risk PE. We developed an interview guide using the implementation science frameworks-the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process. We interviewed 26 emergency physicians from 11 hospital systems, and the participants were diverse with regard to years in practice, practice setting, and engagement with outpatient management of PE. Although outer setting determinants, such as medicolegal climate, follow-up, and insurance status were universal, our participants revealed that the importance of these determinants were moderated by individual-level and inner setting determinants. Prominent themes included belief in consequences, belief in capabilities, and institutional support and culture. Inertia of clinical practice and complexity of the process were important subthemes. In this qualitative study, clinicians reported common barriers and facilitators that initially focused on outer setting and external barriers but centered on clinician beliefs, fear, and local culture. Efforts to increase outpatient treatment of select patients with acute PE should be informed by these barriers and facilitators, which are aligned with the deimplementation theory.

Antibiotic Recommendations After Postpartum Uterine Exploration or Instrumentation.

Multiple postpartum scenarios require uterine exploration or instrumentation. These may introduce bacteria into the uterus, increasing the risk of endometritis. Data on the use of antibiotics in these scenarios is limited, resulting in few guidelines and divergent care. To describe postpartum scenarios requiring uterine exploration and/or instrumentation, review data on antibiotic prophylaxis, and delineate antibiotic recommendations for each scenario. Original articles were obtained from literature search in PubMed, MEDLINE, and OVID; pertinent articles were reviewed. These recommendations are based on published evidence and professional society guidelines. Antibiotic prophylaxis following manual placenta removal should include 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g intravenously (IV) or cefazolin 1 g IV, plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. Antibiotic prophylaxis before postpartum dilation and curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, and intrauterine balloon tamponade should include 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g IV plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. If the patient in any of the above scenarios has received group B Streptococcus prophylaxis, then only metronidazole is recommended. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize these regimens. Uterine exploration or instrumentation increases the risk of postpartum endometritis and requires antibiotic prophylaxis. For manual placenta removal, we recommend 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g IV or cefazolin 1 g IV, plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. For dilation and curettage, manual vacuum aspiration, and intrauterine balloon tamponade, we recommend 1-time combination of ampicillin 2 g IV plus metronidazole 500 mg IV. For patients who already received antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus, we recommend 1-time dose of metronidazole 500 mg IV. Providers can utilize our guidelines to prevent postpartum endometritis in these scenarios requiring postpartum uterine exploration and/or instrumentation.

Management of Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke: A National Survey of Interventional Cardiologists and Vascular Neurologists.

Background Results from multiple clinical trials support patent foramen ovale closure after cryptogenic stroke in select patients, but it remains unclear how new data and updated professional society guidelines have impacted clinical practice. Here, we aimed to compare how stroke neurologists and interventional cardiologists approach patients with cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale and how critical anatomic and clinical factors influence decision making. Methods and Results An electronic survey was administered to 1556 vascular neurologists and 1057 interventional cardiologists throughout the United States. The survey addressed factors such as patient age, preclosure workup, and postclosure antithrombotics. Clinical vignettes highlighted critical variables and used a 5-point Likert scale to assess the providers' level of support for closure. There were 491 survey responses received from 301 (of 1556) vascular neurologists and 190 (of 1057) interventional cardiologists, with an overall response rate of 19%. Vascular neurologists were more likely to recommend against closure on the basis of older age (P<0.001). Interventional cardiologists are more supportive of closure across a range of clinical vignettes, including a very carefully selected patient with cryptogenic stroke (P<0.001), a patient with a high-risk alternative stroke cause (P<0.001), and a range of cases highlighting clinical variables where data are lacking. The majority of interventionalists (88%) seek neurology consultation before pursuing patent foramen ovale closure. Conclusions lnterventional cardiologists are more likely than vascular neurologists to support patent foramen ovale closure across a range of situations. This emphasizes the importance of collaboration and shared decision making, but also reveals an opportunity for professional society educational outreach.

Trends in testosterone prescription during the release of society guidelines.

The American Urological Association and Endocrine Society published guidelines for the management of testosterone deficiency in 2018. Testosterone prescription patterns have varied widely recently, owing to increased public interest and emerging data on the safety of testosterone therapy. The effect of guideline publication on testosterone prescribing is unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess testosterone prescription trends using Medicare prescriber data. Specialties with over 100 testosterone prescribers from 2016-2019 were analyzed. Nine specialties were included (in order of descending prescription frequency): family practice, internal medicine, urology, endocrinology, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, general practice, infectious disease, and emergency medicine. The number of prescribers grew by a mean of 8.8% annually. There was a significant increase in average claims per provider from 2016 to 2019 (26.4 to 28.7, p < 0.0001), with the steepest increase occurring between 2017 and 2018 when the guidelines were released (27.2 to 28.1, p = 0.015). The largest increase in claims per provider was among urologists. Advanced practice providers comprised 7.5% of Medicare testosterone claims in 2016 and 11.6% in 2019. While no causation can be established, these results suggest that professional society guidelines are associated with increasing numbers of testosterone claims per provider, especially among urologists. The changing demographics of prescribers justifies targeted education and further research.

Opportunities to address gaps in early detection and improve outcomes of liver cancer.

Death rates from primary liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]) have continued to rise in the United States over the recent decades despite the availability of an increasing range of treatment modalities, including new systemic therapies. Prognosis is strongly associated with tumor stage at diagnosis; however, most cases of HCC are diagnosed beyond an early stage. This lack of early detection has contributed to low survival rates. Professional society guidelines recommend semiannual ultrasound-based HCC screening for at-risk populations, yet HCC surveillance continues to be underused in clinical practice. On April 28, 2022, the Hepatitis B Foundation convened a workshop to discuss the most pressing challenges and barriers to early HCC detection and the need to better leverage existing and emerging tools and technologies that could improve HCC screening and early detection. In this commentary, we summarize technical, patient-level, provider-level, and system-level challenges and opportunities to improve processes and outcomes across the HCC screening continuum. We highlight promising approaches to HCC risk stratification and screening, including new biomarkers, advanced imaging incorporating artificial intelligence, and algorithms for risk stratification. Workshop participants emphasized that action to improve early detection and reduce HCC mortality is urgently needed, noting concern that many of the challenges we face today are the same or similar to those faced a decade ago and that HCC mortality rates have not meaningfully improved. Increasing the uptake of HCC screening was identified as a short-term priority while developing and validating better screening tests and risk-appropriate surveillance strategies.

Multidisciplinary care for patients with HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Given the complexity of managing HCC, professional society guidelines advocate multidisciplinary care (MDC) for patients with HCC. However, implementation of MDC programs requires a significant investment of time and resources. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to enumerate potential benefits of MDC for patients with HCC. We conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and national conference abstracts to identify studies published after January 2005 that reported early-stage presentation, treatment receipt, or overall survival among patients with HCC, stratified by MDC status. We calculated pooled risk ratios and HRs for clinical outcomes according to MDC receipt using the DerSimonian and Laird method for random effects models. We identified 12 studies (n = 15,365 patients with HCC) with outcomes stratified by MDC status. MDC was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88); however, its association with curative treatment receipt was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.89-2.89) and pooled estimates were limited by high heterogeneity (I2 > 90% for both). Studies (n = 3) were discordant regarding an association between MDC and time-to-treatment initiation. MDC was associated with early-stage HCC (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.12-2.29), suggesting possible referral bias contributing to improved outcomes. Limitations of studies also included risk of residual confounding, loss to follow-up, and data preceding the availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors. MDC for patients with HCC is associated with improved overall survival, underscoring the likely benefit of managing patients with HCC in a multidisciplinary care setting.

Benefit of a Geriatric Evaluation before Operations, Interventions and Oncological Therapies

Benefit of a Geriatric Evaluation before Operations, Interventions and Oncological Therapies Abstract: Older patients face an increased risk of complications and adverse outcomes during and after operations, interventions, and intense oncological therapies. At the same time, this patient group should not be excluded per se from potentially beneficial medical procedures based on chronological age alone. The timely identification of geriatric syndromes and increased vulnerability by means of comprehensive geriatric assessment is becoming increasingly important and is already recommended in the guidelines of professional societies of several medical disciplines. Nonetheless, the geriatric assessment should ideally be followed by proactive co-management in the sense of integrated care. The establishment of interdisciplinary and integrated care pathways for older hospital patients can contribute to significantly improved treatment outcomes. In addition to better patient-related outcomes and rising quality indicators, this approach may also offer positive health economic effects.

Moisture damage and fungal contamination in buildings are a massive health threat - a surgeon's perspective.

Indoor air toxicity is of major public health concern due to the increase in humidity-induced indoor mould exposure and associated health changes. The objective is to present evidence for the causality of health threats and indoor mould exposure. PubMed search on the following keywords: dampness, mould, indoor air quality, public health, dampness, and mould hypersensitivity syndrome, sick building syndrome, and building-related illness as well as information from the health authorities of Bavaria and North Rhine-Westphalia, the Center of Disease Control (CDC), World Health Organisation (WHO), and guidelines of professional societies. The guidelines of professional societies published in 2017 are decisive for the assessment of the impact of mould pollution caused by moisture damage on human health and for official regulations in Germany. Until 2017, a causal connection between moisture damage and mould exposure could usually only be established for pulmonary diseases. The health risk of fungal components is apparent as documented in the fungal priority pathogens list (FPPL) of the WHO. Since 2017, studies, especially in Scandinavia, have proved causality between moisture and mould exposure not only for pulmonary diseases but also for extrapulmonary diseases and symptoms. This was made possible by new test methods for determining the toxicity of fungal components in indoor air. Environmental medical syndromes, e.g., dampness and mould hypersensitivity syndrome (DMHS), sick building syndrome (SBS), building-related symptoms (BRS), and building-related illness (BRI), and fungal pathogens, e.g., Aspergillus fumigatus, pose a major threat to public health. There is evidence for the causality of moisture-induced indoor moulds and severe health threats in these buildings. According to these findings, it is no longer justifiable to ignore or trivialize the mould contamination induced by moisture damage and its effects on pulmonary and extrapulmonary diseases. The health and economic implications of these attitudes are clear.