Team Of Health Care Professionals Research Articles

THERAPEUTIC APPROACH IN COEXISTENCE OF AVOIDANT PERSONALITY DISORDER AND PSYCHOTIC STRUCTURE IN ITS EARLY MANIFESTATIONS: A CASE REPORT

Introduction: The first manifestations of a psychotic structure, generally in adolescence or early adulthood, are an important milestone in an individual's life. But, considering the concomitant signs and symptoms of an avoidant personality disorder can appear since childhood, there is a demand for more targeted and delicate attention from the team of healthcare professionals. Case summary: During the monitoring of the patient, a series of clinical signs and symptoms appeared that met the criteria of two simultaneous psychic conditions, one of them structural and the other personality related. With the aforementioned diagnoses, specific new pharmacological treatment tests were carried out, carrying positive effects and improving the patient's quality of life (introduction of antipsychotics instead of antidepressants as the pivot of therapy). Discussion: the onset of a psychotic condition in the trema phase associated with pre-existing avoidant/avoidant personality disorder demands balanced management between both conditions, using the strategies offered by both pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies. Conclusion: in order to adopt an appropriate treatment and management of the case, due to the complexity of diagnostic simultaneity, constant attention is required from the assistant team, so that continuous reassessments of hypotheses are made and, therefore, adjustments whenever necessary.

Management for Cervical Cancer Patients: A Comparison of the Guidelines from the International Scientific Societies (ESGO-NCCN-ASCO-AIOM-FIGO-BGCS-SEOM-ESMO-JSGO)

Cervical cancer continues to have a significant incidence, despite global efforts in HPV vaccination campaigns. Managing this condition involves a diverse team of healthcare professionals. Research in this field is undergoing a period of great revolution in multiple areas, and international guidelines will soon have to adapt to new scientific evidence. This could be true mainly in locally advanced stages, and it could also be true for minimal invasive surgery. This paper aims to summarize and compare the most recent recommendations published by international gynecological oncological societies for patients with cervical cancer. From their comparison, common aspects and disagreements emerged, especially in the diagnostic pathway and follow-up strategies. Several issues that remain to be debated in the literature were addressed and compared, highlighting similarities and differences, from the role of the sentinel lymph node in early stages to that of the adjuvant hysterectomy in locally advanced tumors. On the surgical side, for this last subset of patients, currently, a laparotomic approach is recommended. At the same time, the advent of immunotherapy has just opened up new and promising scenarios in systemic treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer, and international guidelines will soon introduce it into their algorithms.

A novel global safe surgery mentorship program using a multidisciplinary team approach.

The global surgery movement aims to provide equitable surgical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and attempts to address a wide range of issues around the lack of access and poor-quality. In response, the Lifebox McCaskey Safe Surgery Fellowship was established in Ethiopia to train a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. We conducted this study to evaluate the outcome of this training program. A qualitative study was conducted to evaluate the implementations and outcomes of the first three cohorts of the McCaskey Fellowship. Interviews with fellows, mentors, and program staff reveal valuable insights into the program's strengths and challenges. Key findings include positive feedback on the program's curriculum highlighting its multidisciplinary nature. Challenges were noted in maintaining schedules, communication with healthcare facilities, and budget constraints, suggesting the need for improved program management. The fellowship's impact was evident in altering participants' perceptions of teamwork and enhancing their research and leadership skills. Fellows initiated quality improvement projects impacting surgical practices positively. However, challenges, such as hospital resistance and the COVID-19 pandemic, affected program implementation. Despite various challenges, the program's unique approach combining multidisciplinary training and local mentorship proves promising. It fosters a culture of teamwork, equips participants with essential skills, and encourages fellows to become advocates for safe surgery. As surgical quality champions emerge from this fellowship, there is optimism for lasting positive impacts on surgical care in LMICs.

There is always Sorrow: Risk Factors Faced by Parents of Children Presenting with Severe Intellectual Disabilities

Background: This study investigates the risk factors faced by parents of children with Severe Intellectual Disabilities. Methods: This study used a phenomenological research design within a qualitative research approach. Six parents of children diagnosed with Severe Intellectual Disability at Learners with Special Educational Needs schools were purposively selected to participate in this study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Thematic data analysis was used to analyze data. Results: The findings of this study revealed that parents of children with Severe Intellectual Disabilities faced risks that exacerbated negative outcomes. Psychological distress, social exclusion and isolation, financial burdens, and lack of access to formal education were risk factors that hindered their ability to care for and support their children. Conclusions: Based on these findings, the study concluded that parents need access to multidisciplinary teams of healthcare professionals to support them in combatting the risk factors they face.

Barriers and facilitators of readiness for hospital discharge in patients with myocardial infarction: a qualitative study: quality improvement study.

Readiness for hospital discharge (RHD) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is a key concept in the discharge process. This study was conducted to explain the barriers and facilitators of preparation for discharge in patients with MI. A qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis from April 2021 to 2022. Data collection was done in a targeted manner through semi-structured interviews until the data saturation stage. Nineteen participants (11 patients, 3 family members, and 5 healthcare team) were interviewed. Data analysis was done in eight steps according to the suggested steps of Graneheim and Lundman. MAXQDA18 software was used for coding. From the interviews, 348 primary codes, 11 sub-categories, and 5 categories were extracted. Finally, after continuous analysis and comparison of interviews, codes, and categories, two themes including "supporting platform" and "caring atmosphere" were extracted, which were the result of the participants' experience and understanding of the barriers and facilitators of RHD. The supporting platform included "family support" and "social support" and the caring atmosphere included "care gaps" and "professional healthcare team performance". The results of this study indicate several factors affecting RHD in heart attack patients. According to the results of the study, the participation of the patient, family, healthcare team, and community in creating RHD is recommended. It is also suggested to pay attention to these factors in care and treatment planning to help improve health and control complications and prevent re-hospitalization in these patients.

AOFAS Diabetic Foot Survey Results

Introduction: Foot and ankle pathology in patients with diabetes mellitus is prevalent in the United States and may be associated with significant morbidity. Patient outcomes can be improved by optimal medical management; deformity management and correction to limit the development of infection and ulceration; and timely, appropriate treatment of infection and ulceration when it occurs. Orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons are well-qualified to treat these patients, either individually or as members of a healthcare professional team. However, there are some healthcare professionals and members of the public who are under the impression that orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon are either unwilling or uninterested in treating this patient population. The authors hypothesized that this impression was a misconception and this study was designed to address this question. Methods: An online survey was sent to 1376 AOFAS members practicing in the United States. There were six questions, two of which were demographic and one that asked for additional comments. The survey was completed by 297 (22%) members from 45 states and the District of Columbia. Results: Nonoperative treatment of foot and ankle disorders in patients with diabetes mellitus was performed by 98.7% of responders including 98.7% for fractures; 97.6% for common disorders (e.g., bunions, hammer toes, flatfeet, plantar fasciitis, osteoarthritis, tendon disorders); 89.9% for Charcot arthropathy; 77.1% for infections; and 69.0% for ulcers. Operative treatment of foot and ankle disorders in patients with diabetes mellitus was performed by 98.7% of responders including 97.0% for fracture fixation; 96.3% for gastrocnemius recession and/ or Achilles tendon lengthening; 94.6% for arthrodesis for osteoarthritis; 94.3% for hammer toe surgery; 92.6% for bunion surgery; 89.6% for Charcot exostectomy; 83.8% for Charcot reconstruction; 83.5% for amputations within foot; 81.1% for below knee amputations; 74.8% for operative debridement of infections/ ulcers; and 57.9% for total ankle replacement. When asked which healthcare professionals treat diabetic patients in their community, 96.6% listed podiatrists; 91.3% listed orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons; 69.0% listed other MD/ DO surgeons (e.g. general, plastics, vascular); 64.0% listed nurses (e.g., APRN, wound care specialist); 37.4% listed other orthopaedic surgeons; 31.7% listed non- surgeon MD/ DO physicians; 32.3% listed physician assistants; and 2% listed other. Conclusion: The vast majority of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons practicing in the United States who responded to the survey provide operative and nonoperative treatment to patients with diabetes mellitus and foot and ankle disorders. Given the extensive medical education and training of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons, their knowledge and surgical skill, and the benefits patients with diabetes receive from appropriate and timely foot and ankle care, efforts should be made to educate the public and other healthcare professionals of the availability of most orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons to provide this care.

Communication of the diagnosis to Klinefelter subjects: an observational study on a key moment of the patient's life.

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most prevalent sex chromosome disorder among males. The communication of the KS diagnosis holds significant implications for the diagnosis's acceptance. Recently, the increased use of prenatal diagnostic procedures has raised the question of whether, when, and by whom information, once provided to parents, should be communicated to their children/adolescents. Currently, there is limited information on this topic. This study aims to investigate the most suitable timing, content, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) according to KS patients' suggestions for conveying the diagnosis, analyzing the impact of communicating the KS diagnosis on patients and their reception of the communication in real-life situations. Furthermore, research entails a comparison of the actual communication and the patients' preferred mode of communication. Self-reported interview data was collected from 196 adults diagnosed with KS. The interview was structured, consisting of 32 multiple-choice questions covering various areas related to diagnosis communication. Most patients with Klinefelter syndrome reported that earlier communication would have been beneficial. Communication before the age of 18 and by parents increased the likelihood of overcoming negative consequences and relying on psychological support. To mitigate the adverse effects of poorly timed and inadequately delivered communication, typically by a single person, it is advisable that such communication be carried out at the onset of adolescence by an interdisciplinary team of HCPs (including psychologists, geneticists, endocrinologists) and parents. The information provided should not solely concentrate on hormonal and fertility aspects, but also consider other factors such as psychological variables.

Reaching out to Patients with Long COVID to Better Understand Their Life Experiences and How to Support Their Recovery: A Patient-Oriented Knowledge Sharing Session.

This article reports on participants' experiences with long COVID-19 (LC) (symptoms, impact, healthcare use, and perceived needs) and satisfaction with a patient-oriented knowledge-sharing session organized by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, researchers, and a patient partner. Twenty-six participants completed a pre-session survey. On average, they were 21 months post-COVID-19 infection (SD 10.9); 81% of them were female, and 84% were 40+ years old. The main symptoms reported included fatigue (96%), cognitive problems (92%), and general pain or discomfort (40%). More than half of the participants reported that LC has had a significant impact on their health-related quality of life. Eighty-one percent of the participants reported seeking medical help for their LC symptoms and found the services provided by physical therapists, primary care providers, and acupuncturists to be helpful in managing their condition. Participants would like to have access to healthcare providers and clinics specializing in LC. They liked the session and found the information presented useful. This information helps to better understand the experiences of people living with LC and how to support their recovery.

Barriers and facilitators to the formation of professional identity among nursing students: A four-year longitudinal qualitative study

BackgroundNursing professional identity (NPI) is essential for nurses to develop their nursing profession. It reflects the competencies consistent with the professional practices of nurses and contributes to them providing better healthcare and public health. The formation process of NPI started with undergraduate nursing education and continued throughout the nursing career. ObjectiveTo explore nursing students' perceptions of facilitators and barriers to the formation of NPI during their study. MethodsA 4-year longitudinal, qualitative research design with yearly semi-structured interviews undertaken from 2019 to 2022. The reflexive thematic analysis methodology was applied for the data analysis. ResultsNinety-three nursing students were recruited, joining a group or individual interview. The four-year nursing baccalaureate program revealed a dynamic formation process of NPI: “Outsider of nursing”, “Entering the nursing courses”, “Building nursing competence”, and “Thinking and acting like a nurse”. A total of 12 themes were identified to present the barriers and facilitators to the NPI formation at different stages. Specifically, the six barriers include conflict between their ideals and reality, sociocultural stereotypes about nursing, the negative impact of COVID-19, the pre-internship concerns, struggling to meet expectations, and potential danger and discrimination in the healthcare settings. The enablers were: self-motivation and inner belief towards the nursing profession, the power of role models, the improvement of nursing capacity, well integration into the healthcare professional teams, understanding of the clinical environment, and recognition and encouragement from others. ConclusionsThe formation of nursing students' NPI is an ever-changing process, with various intrinsic and extrinsic influences during their four-year study. Nursing educators are suggested to prepare and develop students' professional comportment in their theoretical and clinical practice to develop their professional identity as a nurse.

"Building More Connected Primary Care: Improving Connections between Primary Care and Community Care, Specialists and Hospitals for Timely and Appropriate Care"

Although strong, well connected primary care results in better health outcomes and health equity at a lower cost, most family physicians in Ontario, Canada are not supported by teams and have variable connections to other system sectors resulting in variable access and quality of care. A continuous relationship with a family physician and primary care team facilitates access to timely care, appropriate preventive care, reduced acute care utilization and costs, reduced mortality and more satisfied patients. This was further confirmed during the COVID 19 pandemic when patients who were attached to primary care teams had superior care for both COVID and non-COVID health issues.
 Together with patients, families, family physicians and all health care sectors, we co-created and evaluated efficient models of connecting family physicians to: specialists for just in time advice, virtual and in-person consults; to interprofessional teams tailored to the needs of their practices and to navigation services tailored to primary care. These models were co-designed with family physicians and continue to evolve based on their evolving needs:
 SCOPE (Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience) connects primary care providers (PCPs) in the community to real-time supports through a single point of access, Co-designed with local PCPS, SCOPE improves access to an interprofessional team who can help with urgent medical consultations, diagnostic imaging, curated home and community care, mental health, and navigation of other services available in the hospital or in the community.
 TIP (Telemedicine IMPACT PLUS) TIP (Telemedicine IMPACT Plus) provides rapid access to case consultation by a virtual team of health care professionals to enable proactive health and social care for patients living with multi-morbidity. The case conference involves the patient/caregivers, family physician and TIP RN along with the consulting team that consists of: Psychiatrist, Internist, Pharmacist, Social Worker, Home Care Coordinator, Dietitian and others as required. The purpose of this consultation is to coordinate care and derive new solutions for addressing chronic conditions. A dedicated
 TIP nurse facilitator prepares the case, facilitates the consultation with one of 12 available teams, summarizes a coordinated care plan and coordinates the patient’s circle of care.
 Building interprofessional primary care teams based on family physician patient roster needs relies on nourishing foundational relationships with local PCPs to help identify gaps in care, engaging PCPS in continuous program improvement and developing partnerships with key stakeholders: leadership from the anchor hospital and their specialist groups, home and community care and community organizations. Joint implementation is based on the value proposition that all sectors win when care is appropriately triaged and managed in the community.
 When combined, connected and integrated into primary care practices, these initiatives build the Patient Medical Home, with the PCP at the centre of care, support to more effectively co-manage patients using existing resources more efficiently mapped to patient needs. These initiatives support relationship-based navigation, the underpinning of team-based primary care essential to improving system navigation for timely access to needs-based care.
 The target audience: patients, families, interprofessional primary care providers, specialists, home care and community providers, and hospitals.
 
 
 

Primary Care Family Physicians’ Experiences with Clinical Integration: A Scoping Review of Qualitative and Mixed Reviews

Background: Clinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how healthcare services are coordinated over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. Promoting integrated care with interventions that lack systematic approaches can unintentionally increase the complexity and fragmentation of the healthcare system. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its many influencing factors is paramount. This phase I study aims to generate a comprehensive map of family physician (FP) perceived factors, across diseases and patient demographics, influencing how services are integrated for patients. 
 Methods: The protocol development is guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology framework. Keywords and MeSH terms were contributed by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, researchers, and patient representatives through an iterative discussion. An Information Specialist with clinical research expertise tested keywords and MeSH terms to build a search strategy using MEDLINE. The strategy was then adjusted for the EMBASE and CINAHL databases. All identified articles were imported into Covidence platform, and 228 duplicates were removed. Two independent reviewers screened 1,771 studies by their titles and abstracts. Of them, 264 studies were reviewed in full text against the selection criteria and their references were hand-searched. A total of 91 articles were included, and over 2,800 factors were extracted. The factors are being or will be coded into themes the Clinical Integration Framework, a merging of two existing models identified from literature and modified. Within each theme, similar codes are clustered together as a subtheme. 
 Discussion: The identified factors will help develop a survey in Phase II study to ascertain high impact factors for intervention(s), as well as thematic and evidence gaps to guide future research. The study findings will be shared with stakeholders to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy makers, and social media for the public.

Comprehensive care for late preterm infants: fostering integrated follow-up

Late preterm infants, although they are born closer to full term than extremely preterm infants, still face unique challenges due to their premature birth. Understanding these potential outcomes and providing appropriate support is key to ensuring their optimal development. A tailored follow-up program, guided by an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, aims to provide early identification, continuous monitoring, and individualized care for late preterm infants. The core components of this program include developmental assessments, medical surveillance, parent education and support, and a family-centered approach. A well-structured late preterm follow-up program not only promotes the overall health and well-being of late preterm infants but also help these babies to achieve their full potential.

Military Health Care Team Cohesion and Performance During Simulation Training.

Military health care team cohesion has been linked to improved performance during simulation training. However, there is a gap in current research regarding the processes by which teams become cohesive within simulation training. The purpose of this study was to explore how health care teams evolve during high-fidelity simulation training and the ways in which team cohesion impacts their performance. The participants in our study were fourth-year military medical students participating in a 5-day high-fidelity military medical simulation during Fall 2022.Twenty-three students volunteered to participate in our study. We interviewed each participant twice during the simulation and then transcribed each interview using an automated transcription service. Guided by the grounded theory tradition of qualitative data analysis, we used open, axial, and selective coding to analyze the interview data. Our data analysis revealed that teams went through a process of (1) struggle, (2) adaptation, (3) perceived improvement, (4) gained confidence, and (5) perceived team cohesion. Teams struggled through the various barriers to group cohesion (i.e., power dynamics, role designation and competency, and task failures and low team confidence) in order to understand their weaknesses. As teams adjusted and noticed improvement, they adapted new patterns, protocols, and standards of practice based on previous failures, improving their overall confidence. The participants perceived their teams as successful once they had progressed through these phases and ended the simulation as a cohesive unit. Our qualitative data analysis provided insight into team cohesion as it was forged by participants in real time as the simulation progressed. The results of our study can be used to promote team cohesion not only during simulation training but also within military health care professional teams in order to enhance their performance in the field.

An Overview of Specialist Services for Huntington’s Disease in the United Kingdom

Background: Huntington’s disease (HD) is a rare inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by complex evolving needs that change as the condition progresses. There is limited understanding about the organization of HD clinical services and their resourcing in the United Kingdom (UK). Objective: To understand the organization and resourcing of specialist HD services for people with HD (PwHD) in the UK Methods: This cross-sectional study collected quantitative data via on online survey, and qualitative data via telephone semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to describe quantitative outcomes, and qualitative results were analyzed using content analysis. Results: A total of 31 specialist services for HD were identified. Of the 27 services that completed the online survey, 23 had an active multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and were led primarily by a mental health trust (26%) or tertiary referral hospital (26%). Specialist services offered outpatient clinics (96%), outreach in the community (74%), telemedicine (70%), inpatient beds (26%) and satellite clinics (26%). Many services indicated that their capacity (ability to see patients as often as needed with current resources) was difficult, with some services reporting more difficulty at the early or later stages of HD. Key resourcing gaps were identified with access to facilities, HCPs and referral networks. Conclusions: This research highlights the variation in organization and capacity within individual HD services as well as current resourcing and gaps in access that influence this capacity. Further research should be done to understand the impact of service organization and current resourcing gaps in access on the quality of care provided for PwHD in the UK.

An Overview of Specialist Services for Huntington's Disease in the United Kingdom.

Huntington's disease (HD) is a rare inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by complex evolving needs that change as the condition progresses. There is limited understanding about the organization of HD clinical services and their resourcing in the United Kingdom (UK). To understand the organization and resourcing of specialist HD services for people with HD (PwHD) in the UKMethods:This cross-sectional study collected quantitative data via on online survey, and qualitative data via telephone semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to describe quantitative outcomes, and qualitative results were analyzed using content analysis. A total of 31 specialist services for HD were identified. Of the 27 services that completed the online survey, 23 had an active multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and were led primarily by a mental health trust (26%) or tertiary referral hospital (26%). Specialist services offered outpatient clinics (96%), outreach in the community (74%), telemedicine (70%), inpatient beds (26%) and satellite clinics (26%). Many services indicated that their capacity (ability to see patients as often as needed with current resources) was difficult, with some services reporting more difficulty at the early or later stages of HD. Key resourcing gaps were identified with access to facilities, HCPs and referral networks. This research highlights the variation in organization and capacity within individual HD services as well as current resourcing and gaps in access that influence this capacity. Further research should be done to understand the impact of service organization and current resourcing gaps in access on the quality of care provided for PwHD in the UK.

Extending cBioPortal for Therapy Recommendation Documentation in Molecular Tumor Boards: Development and Usability Study.

In molecular tumor boards (MTBs), patients with rare or advanced cancers are discussed by a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals. Software support for MTBs is lacking; in particular, tools for preparing and documenting MTB therapy recommendations need to be developed. We aimed to implement an extension to cBioPortal to provide a tool for the documentation of therapy recommendations from MTB sessions in a secure and standardized manner. The developed extension should be embedded in the patient view of cBioPortal to enable easy documentation during MTB sessions. The resulting architecture for storing therapy recommendations should be integrable into various hospital information systems. On the basis of a requirements analysis and technology analysis for authentication techniques, a prototype was developed and iteratively refined through a user-centered development process. In conclusion, the tool was evaluated via a usability evaluation, including interviews, structured questionnaires, and the System Usability Scale. The patient view of cBioPortal was extended with a new tab that enables users to document MTB sessions and therapy recommendations. The role-based access control was expanded to allow for a finer distinction among the rights to view, edit, and delete data. The usability evaluation showed overall good usability and a System Usability Scale score of 83.57. This study demonstrates how cBioPortal can be extended to not only visualize MTB patient data but also be used as a documentation platform for therapy recommendations.

Inaccessibility, unresponsiveness, inconsistency, and invisibility of informal caregivers of older persons with cognitive impairment: community-based participatory research

BackgroundStudies on informal caregivers in Japan have been limited to family caregivers and largely conducted where family caregivers generally gather. Family caregivers who do not visit such places or non-family caregivers are generally overlooked, and data on these informal caregivers remains scant. Consequently, a framework is needed through which healthcare professionals can approach the informal caregivers of community-dwelling older persons. Therefore, this study approaches such informal caregivers and proposes a classification system for them from the starting point of older persons living in the community with cognitive impairment.MethodsIn 2016, we conducted an epidemiological survey of 7000 + community-dwelling older persons and identified 198 residents with Mini-mental state examination scores less than 23. A team of healthcare professionals contacted them regularly. By 2022, 92 people were still living in the community, and we systematically asked them about their informal caregivers. After approaching the caregivers and obtaining informed consent, we mailed separate questionnaires to older persons and informal caregivers.ResultsAmong the caregivers, 59%, 34%, and 3% were the child, spouse, and sibling of the older person, while the remaining 4% were non-family caregivers. Except for two daughters-in-laws, all children were biological children of the older person. Male caregivers (46%) tended to have full-time jobs, whereas female caregivers (54%) tended to face financial difficulties. Only 3% of the caregivers had joined a family caregivers’ association. Caregivers’ reason for not joining such organizations was a lack of time and knowledge. A 3-tiered classification system was developed for these informal caregivers: (1) the household form, (2) accessibility, and (3) the reciprocal awareness of caregiving. Furthermore, family caregivers who lived with the older person or visited them more than once a week with reciprocal awareness of caring and being cared, or “traditional caregivers,” accounted for 68% of the caregivers in this study.ConclusionCore family caregivers can be easily approached at places where such caregivers generally gather. However, there also exists a group of informal caregivers who are sometimes inaccessible, unresponsive, and invisible to healthcare professionals. Moreover, their awareness of caregiving is sometimes inconsistent.

Implications of Agile Values in Software Engineering for Agility in Breast Cancer Treatment: Protocol for a Comparative Study.

Breast cancer treatment has been described as a dynamic and patient-centered approach that emphasizes adaptability and flexibility throughout the treatment process. Breast cancer is complex, with varying subtypes and stages, making it important to tailor treatment plans to each patient's unique circumstances. Breast cancer treatment delivery relies on a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals who collaborate to provide personalized care and quick adaptation to changing conditions to optimize outcomes while minimizing side effects and maintaining the patient's quality of life. However, agility in breast cancer treatment has not been defined according to common agile values and described in language comprehensible to breast cancer professionals. In the rapidly evolving landscape of breast cancer treatment, the incorporation of agile values from software engineering promises to enhance patient care. Our objective is to propose agile values for breast cancer treatment adopted and adapted from software engineering. We also aim to validate how these values conform to the concept of agility in the breast cancer context through referencing past work. We applied a structured research methodology to identify and validate 4 agile values for breast cancer treatment. In the elicitation phase, through 2 interviews, we identified 4 agile values and described them in language that resonates with breast cancer treatment professionals. The values were then validated by a domain expert and discussed in the context of supporting work from the literature. Final validation entailed a domain expert conducting a walkthrough of the 4 identified agile values to adjust them as per the reported literature. Four agile values were identified for breast cancer treatment, and among them, we validated 3 that conformed to the concept of agility. The fourth value, documentation and the quality of documentation, is vital for breast cancer treatment planning and management. This does not conform to agility. However, its nonagility is vital for the agility of the other values. None of the identified agile values were validated as partially conforming to the concept of agility. This work makes a novel contribution to knowledge in identifying the first set of agile values in breast cancer treatment through multidisciplinary research. Three of these values were evaluated as conforming to the concept of agility, and although 1 value did not meet the concept of agility, it enhanced the agility of the other values. It is anticipated that these 4 agile values can drive oncology practice, strategies, policies, protocols, and procedures to enhance delivery of care. Moreover, the identified values contribute to identifying quality assurance and control practices to assess the concept of agility in oncology practice and breast cancer treatment and adjust corresponding actions. We conclude that breast cancer treatment agile values are not limited to 4. RR1-10.2196/53124.

Hospital discharge using salbutamol as required after acute attacks of wheeze in children: a service evaluation

ObjectiveMost UK hospitals discharge children after acute wheeze with advice to give regular salbutamol using a fixed dose weaning regime. We have introduced and evaluated the safety and efficacy of...

Enhancing Disaster Triage Competencies through Simulation-Based Training: An Interventional Study among Undergraduate Nursing Students

This pre–post interventional study explores the effectiveness of simulation-based training in enhancing disaster nursing skills among nursing students at Taif University, Saudi Arabia. The training, which uses a realistic train accident simulation and involves a response team of healthcare professionals, aims to improve knowledge and performance in crisis management and triage during mass casualty incidents. The study’s necessity stems from the critical role nurses play in disaster response, requiring a comprehensive understanding of challenges, collaboration among stakeholders, and improved capabilities. A random sample of 101 nursing students voluntarily participated in the study, with the necessary approvals obtained. We measured their emergency management skills and knowledge using a detailed questionnaire (27 items) and conducted pretest and posttest evaluations. Data analysis was performed using SPSS. The results indicate the training’s effectiveness, as a significant portion of participants achieved high performance levels in the posttest, contrasting with a higher percentage of fail-level grades in the pretest. These findings underscore the potential to improve disaster management protocols and nursing professionals’ preparedness in Saudi Arabia. The study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive education in disaster nursing in enhancing emergency response and patient outcomes.