Production Responses Of Dairy Cows Research Articles

Milk production responses of dairy cows to fatty acid supplements with different ratios of palmitic and oleic acids in low- and high-fat basal diets

We evaluated the effects of fatty acid (FA) supplements with different ratios of palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (cis-9 C18:1) in low- and high-FA basal diets on production responses of lactating dairy cows. Thirty-six multiparous Holstein cows (50.2 ± 5.8 kg/d of milk; 160 ± 36 d in milk) were used in a split-plot Latin square design balanced for carryover effects. Cows were blocked by milk yield and allocated to a main plot receiving either a low-FA (LF; 1.93% FA content) basal diet (n = 18) containing cottonseed meal and cottonseed hulls or a high-FA (HF; 3.15% FA content) basal diet (n = 18) containing whole cottonseed. Within each plot, a 3 × 3 Latin square arrangement of treatments was used in 3 consecutive 21-d periods. Treatments were (1) control (CON; no FA supplementation), (2) FA supplement containing 80% C16:0 + 10% C18:1 (PA), and (3) FA supplement containing 60% C16:0 + 30% cis-9 C18:1 (PA+OA). The FA supplements were fed at 1.5% of dry matter and replaced soyhulls in CON. Preplanned contrasts were (1) overall effect of FA supplementation {CON vs. the average of the FA treatments [1/2 (PA + PA+OA)]}, and (2) the effect of the PA treatment versus the PA+OA treatment (PA vs. PA+OA). Treatment by basal diet interactions were observed for yields of milk and lactose, where FA treatments increased yields of milk and milk lactose in LF but not in HF. Basal diet had no effect on dry matter intake (DMI) or milk yield. Compared with LF, HF increased milk fat yield and 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM) and tended to increase milk fat content and energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield. The FA treatments decreased DMI but increased the yields of milk fat, 3.5% FCM, and ECM, compared with CON, due to increases in mixed and preformed milk FA yields. The PA+OA treatment decreased DMI and milk protein yield compared with PA. In conclusion, a high-fat basal diet increased milk fat production, and the addition of FA supplements to a low-fat basal diet increased milk lactose yield and tended to increase milk yield. Additionally, regardless of basal diet fat level, FA supplements increased production responses compared with the non-FA-supplemented control diet.

Abomasal infusion of oleic acid and exogenous emulsifier alter fatty acid digestibility and production responses of lactating dairy cows

We evaluated the effects of abomasal infusion of cis-9 C18:1 (oleic acid) and an exogenous emulsifier (polysorbate-C18:1) on fatty acid (FA) digestibility and production responses of dairy cows. Eight rumen-cannulated multiparous cows (96 ± 23 d in milk) were assigned to a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments in 4 × 4 Latin squares with 18-d periods consisting of 7 d of washout and 11 d of infusion. Treatments were abomasal infusions of water carrier only (CON), 45 g/d oleic acid (OA), 20 g/d polysorbate-C18:1 (T80), or both 45 g/d OA and 20 g/d T80 (OA+T80). The OA treatments were dissolved in ethanol and the T80 treatments in water. To deliver the daily dose for each treatment, the infusate solution was divided into 4 equal infusions per day, occurring every 6 h. Cows were fed the same diet, which contained [% of dry matter (DM)] 30.3% neutral detergent fiber (NDF), 16.3% crude protein, 30% starch, and 3.2% FA (including 1.8% DM from a FA supplement containing 34.4% C16:0 and 47.7% C18:0). Infusion of T80 increased NDF digestibility compared with all other treatments (3.57 percentage units), whereas OA+T80 decreased NDF digestibility compared with CON (3.30 percentage units). Compared with CON, OA (4.90 percentage units) and T80 (3.40 percentage units) increased total FA digestibility, whereas OA+T80 had no effect on total FA digestibility. We did not observe differences between OA and T80 for total FA digestibility. Infusion of OA (3.90 percentage units) and T80 (2.80 percentage units) increased 16-carbon FA digestibility compared with CON. Digestibility of 16-carbon FA did not differ between OA and T80 or between CON and OA+T80. Compared with CON, OA increased (5.60 percentage units) and T80 tended to increase 18-carbon FA digestibility. Digestibility of 18-carbon FA did not differ between OA and T80 or between CON and OA+T80. Compared with CON, all treatments increased or tended to increase the absorption of total and 18-carbon FA. Infusion of OA and T80 increased the yields of milk fat (both increased 0.10 kg/d), 3.5% fat-corrected milk (1.90 and 2.50 kg/d), and energy-corrected milk (1.80 and 2.60 kg/d) compared with CON. We did not observe differences between OA and T80 or between CON and OA+T80 for yields of milk fat, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, or energy-corrected milk. Infusing OA tended to increase plasma insulin concentration compared with CON. Compared with the other treatments, OA+T80 decreased the yield of de novo milk FA (31.3 g/d). Compared with CON, OA tended to increase the yield of de novo milk FA. Compared with OA+T80, CON and OA tended to increase the yield of mixed milk FA, whereas T80 increased it (83 g/d). Compared with CON, all emulsifier treatments increased the yield of preformed milk FA (52.7 g/d). In conclusion, abomasally infusing either 45 g of OA or 20 g of T80 improved digestibility and similarly favored the production parameters of dairy cows. In contrast, providing both (45 g of OA + 20 g of T80) had no additional benefits and moderated the positive responses observed in the individual treatments with OA and T80.

Effect of Potato By-Product on Production Responses of Dairy Cows and Total Mixed Ration Stability

Vegetable by-products have great potential for use as animal feeds and thus could improve the sustainability of the food system. The objective was to evaluate the milk production potential of potato by-product (PBP) replacing cereal grains in grass silage-based total mixed ration (TMR). Additionally, a laboratory scale experiment was conducted to assess the effect of PBP and chemical preservatives on the aerobic stability of TMRs. A change-over dairy cow feeding experiment was conducted to evaluate the inclusion of 135 g/kg (on a dry matter (DM) basis) of PBP in TMR. Additionally, the aerobic stability of TMR was evaluated by preparing TMRs with increasing levels of PBP and treated with different doses of formic and propionic acid or salt-based preservatives. The inclusion of PBP in dairy cow diets decreased feed intake, but organic matter digestibility was greater in the PBP diet, resulting in only slightly decreased production (milk protein 1435 vs. 1363 g/day, p < 0.05; milk lactose 1716 vs. 1606 g/day, p < 0.05). The aerobic stability of TMR was negatively affected by the inclusion of PBP, but it could to a limited extent be prolonged using chemical preservatives. The inclusion of PBP decreased feed intake and milk production to some extent when included in the diet of high-producing dairy cows. The utilization of PBP may, however, be justified from a sustainability point of view, as it provides a way to circulate the nutrients of a non-human edible feed material back into the food chain.

Effect of supplementing palmitic acid and altering the dietary ratio of n-6:n-3 fatty acids in low-fibre diets on production responses of dairy cows.

Supplementing palmitic acid (C16 : 0) in combination with modifying the dietary n-6:n-3 fatty acid (FA) ratio may benefit energy metabolism and milk responses of dairy cows. Twelve Holstein cows (70 (sd 11) days in milk) were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square and allocated to four low-fibre diets (18·5 % forage neutral-detergent fibre) supplemented with no FA (CON), or 2·4 % C16 : 0-enriched supplement (PAL), 2·4 % mixture (2:1) of C16 : 0 and n-6 FA (PW6), and mixture (2:1) of C16 : 0 and n-3 FA (PW3). The dietary ratio of n-6:n-3 was increased with PW6 (10:1) and decreased with PW3 (2·8:1), whereas PAL alone made no change in the ratio (about 7:1). Compared with CON, all FA-supplemented treatments increased milk yield. However, feed and energy intakes were higher in PAL than PW3 or PW6, resulting in greater feed efficiency for PW3 and PW6 than PAL. Dietary FA supplements decreased milk protein concentration but tended to increase protein yield. Compared with CON and FA mixtures, PAL increased milk fat content and tended to increase milk SFA and atherosclerotic index. The concentration of milk n-3 FA was similar between CON and PW3. Feeding PAL increased milk energy output and decreased energy partitioning towards body reserves (-4·2 %), while this measure was positive for other treatments. Blood TAG and NEFA concentrations, but not β-hydroxybutyrate, were increased by FA-supplemented treatments. Feeding C16 : 0 combined with either n-6 or n-3 FA enhanced feed efficiency, alleviated the negative impacts on body energy reserves, but lowering the dietary n-6:n-3 ratio improved the FA profile of milk.

Effects of commercially available palmitic and stearic acid supplements on nutrient digestibility and production responses of lactating dairy cows

We evaluated the effects of commercially available fatty acid (FA) supplements containing palmitic (C16:0) and stearic acid (C18:0) on nutrient digestibility and production responses of dairy cows. Thirty-six mid-lactation (146 ± 55 d in milk) multiparous Holstein cows were randomly assigned to twelve 3 × 3 balanced truncated Latin squares, with 3 treatments and 2 consecutive 35-d periods, with the final 5 d used for sample and data collection. Treatments were (1) a control diet containing no supplemental FA (CON), (2) a control diet supplemented with a commercially available C16:0 supplement (PA), and (3) a control diet supplemented with a commercially available C16:0 and C18:0 supplement (MIX). Supplements were fed at 1.5% dry matter and replaced soyhulls in CON. The statistical model included the random effect of cow nested within square and the fixed effects of treatment, period, square, and their interactions. Preplanned contrasts were (1) overall effect of FA treatments [CON vs. the average of the FA treatments (FAT); 1/2 (PA + MIX)], and (2) effect of FA supplement (PA vs. MIX). Treatment had no effects on dry matter intake, body weight, or body weight change. Compared with CON, FAT decreased digestibilities of total FA and 18-carbon FA but did not affect dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibility. Compared with MIX, PA increased dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibilities by 3.6 and 4.8 percentage units, respectively. The PA also increased total FA and 18-carbon FA digestibilities but did not alter 16-carbon FA digestibility compared with MIX. Using a Lucas test, we estimated apparent digestibility coefficients of 0.768 and 0.553 for the PA and MIX supplements, respectively. Compared with CON, FAT increased milk yield and tended to increase energy-corrected milk, but did not affect yield of milk fat or milk protein. The PA increased energy-corrected milk and milk fat yield but had no effect on milk protein yield compared with MIX. Our results indicate that dairy cows producing around 45 kg of milk respond better to a FA supplement enriched in C16:0 compared with a supplement containing both C16:0 and C18:0, which is likely due in part to PA increasing FA and neutral detergent fiber digestibility compared with MIX.

Milk production responses and rumen fermentation of dairy cows supplemented with summer brassicas

Forage brassicas, such as summer turnip (ST; Brassica rapa) and forage rape (FR; Brassica napus), are used as supplementary crops during summer. However, studies with lactating dairy cows fed these forages are limited and report inconsistent productive responses. The aim of this study was to determine dry matter intake, rumen fermentation and milk production responses of dairy cows in mid-lactation supplemented with and without summer (‘ST’ or ‘FR’) brassicas. Twelve multiparous lactating dairy cows were randomly allocated to three dietary treatments in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design balanced for residual effects over three 21-day periods. The control diet consisted of 16.2 kg DM of grass silage, 2.25 kg DM of commercial concentrate and 2.25 kg DM solvent-extracted soybean meal. For the other two dietary treatments, 25% of the amounts of silage and concentrates were replaced with FR or ST. The inclusion of forage brassicas had no effects on milk production (24.2 kg cow/day average) and composition (average milk fat and protein 43.2 and 33.6 g/l, respectively). Dry matter intake was 0.98 kg and 1.12 kg lower for cows supplemented with FR and ST, respectively, resulting in a greater feed conversion efficiency (1.35 kg milk/kg DM for ST and FR v. 1.27 kg milk/kg DM for the control diet). Intraruminal pH was lower for cows supplemented with ST compared to the control diet; however, it did not decrease below pH 5.8 at any time of the day. After feeding, the concentrations of total short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in rumen contents increased with ST supplementation compared to the control diet. Inclusion of FR in the diet increased the molar proportion of acetate (68.5 mmol/100 mmol) in total SCFA at the expense of propionate, measured 6 h after feeding of the forage. The molar proportion of butyric acid was greater with ST and FR supplementation (13.1 and 12 mmol/100 mmol, respectively) than in control cows. The estimated microbial nitrogen (N) flow was 89.1 g/day greater when supplementing FR compared to the control diet. Based on the haematological measures, the inclusion of summer brassica forages did not affect the health status of the animals. These results indicate that mid-lactation dairy cows fed brassicas are able to maintain production despite the reduced intake, probably due to improved rumen fermentation and therefore nutrient utilization.

Milk production and nutrient digestibility responses to triglyceride or fatty acid supplements enriched in palmitic acid

The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of feeding triglyceride and fatty acid (FA) supplements enriched in palmitic acid (PA; C16:0) on production and nutrient digestibility responses of mid-lactation dairy cows. Fifteen Holstein cows (137 ± 49 d in milk) were randomly assigned to a treatment sequence in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Treatments consisted of a control diet (CON; no added PA) or 1.5% FA added as either a FA supplement (PA-FA) or a triglyceride supplement (PA-TG). The PA supplements replaced soyhulls, and diets were balanced for glycerol content. Periods were 21 d in length with sample and data collection occurring during the final 5 d. Compared with CON, PA treatments increased dry matter (66.5 vs. 63.9%) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) apparent digestibility (42.0 vs. 38.2%). Although PA treatments tended to increase 18-carbon FA apparent digestibility (79.1 vs. 77.9%), PA treatments decreased 16-carbon (63.1 vs. 75.8%) and total FA (72.0 vs. 76.5%) apparent digestibilities compared with CON. The PA treatments increased milk fat content (3.60 vs. 3.41%), milk fat yield (1.70 vs. 1.60 kg/d), yield of 16-carbon milk FA (570 vs. 471 g/d), 3.5% fat-corrected milk (47.6 vs. 46.5 kg/d), and energy-corrected milk (47.4 vs. 46.6 kg/d) compared with CON. The PA treatments did not affect dry matter intake (28.5 vs. 29.2 kg/d), milk yield (47.0 vs. 47.4 kg/d), milk protein yield (1.42 vs. 1.45 kg/d), milk lactose yield (2.29 vs. 2.31 kg/d), yield of <16-carbon milk FA (360 vs. 370 g/d), yield of >16-carbon milk FA (642 vs. 630 g/d), body weight (720 vs. 723 kg), or body condition score (3.14 vs. 3.23). We did not observe differences in digestibilities of dry matter, NDF, and 18-carbon FA between PA-TG and PA-FA. In contrast, PA-FA increased 16-carbon (68.6 vs. 57.6%) and total FA apparent digestibility (73.8 vs. 70.1%) compared with PA-TG. This resulted in PA-FA supplementation increasing the apparent digestibility of the PA supplement by ∼10 percentage points compared with PA-TG. Compared with PA-TG, PA-FA increased 16-carbon FA intake by 60 g/d, absorbed 16-carbon FA by 86 g/d, and absorbed total FA by 85 g/d. Compared with PA-TG, PA-FA increased dry matter intake (29.1 vs. 27.8 kg/d), yield of 16-carbon milk FA (596 vs. 545 g/d), and tended to increase milk yield (47.6 vs. 46.4 kg/d), milk fat yield (1.70 vs. 1.66 kg/d), and 3.5% fat-corrected milk (48.1 vs. 47.2 kg/d). In conclusion, the production response of dairy cows to PA tended to be greater for a FA supplement compared with a triglyceride supplement. Overall, PA increased NDF digestibility, milk fat yield, energy-corrected milk, and feed efficiency in mid-lactation dairy cows.

Short communication: Comparison of a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement and calcium salts of palm fatty acids supplement on production responses of dairy cows

The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of feeding a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement or a calcium salts of palm fatty acid (FA) supplement on nutrient digestibility and production responses of mid-lactation dairy cows. Fifteen Holstein cows (139 ± 39 d in milk) were randomly assigned to treatment sequence in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. Treatments were a control diet (CON; no fat supplement) and 1.5% of FA added either as a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement (PA-TG) or as calcium salts of palm FA supplement (Ca-FA). Fat-supplemented treatments did not affect dry matter intake (DMI) compared with CON, but Ca-FA reduced DMI compared with PA-TG. Compared with CON, fat-supplemented treatments increased 18-carbon FA digestibility by 2.0 percentage units but did not affect digestibility of total FA or 16-carbon FA. Compared with Ca-FA, PA-TG reduced total FA digestibility by 8.7 percentage units due to a decrease in 16-carbon FA digestibility (21.7 percentage units). Both fat supplements increased neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility compared with CON (3.90 percentage units), and PA-TG tended to increase NDF digestibility by 1.60 percentage units compared with Ca-FA. Compared with CON, fat-supplemented treatments increased milk yield (1.05 kg/d), 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield (2.20 kg/d), and energy-corrected milk yield (1.80 kg/d). Also, PA-TG increased milk fat yield (50 g/d) and milk energy output (1.0 Mcal/d) and tended to increase milk fat content (0.07 percentage units) and energy-corrected milk yield (1.0 kg/d) compared with Ca-FA. Fat-supplemented treatments reduced the yield of de novo milk FA (23 g/d) and increased the yields of mixed (43 g/d) and preformed (52 g/d) milk FA compared with CON. The PA-TG treatment increased the yield of 16-carbon (66 g/d) milk FA compared with Ca-FA, whereas Ca-FA increased the yield of preformed (60 g/d) milk FA. Fat-supplemented treatments increased intake of net energy for lactation by 1.80 Mcal/d, milk energy output by 1.30 Mcal/d, and energy in body reserves by 0.30 Mcal/d compared with CON. The Ca-FA treatment increased energy allocated to body reserves (0.60 Mcal/d), energy partitioning toward body reserves (1.20 percentage units), and body condition score change (0.06 units), and tended to increase body weight change (0.16 kg/d) and body condition score (0.08 units) compared with PA-TG. In conclusion, feeding a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement increased milk energy output due to increased yields of milk and milk fat, whereas feeding a calcium salts of palm FA supplement increased FA digestibility and energy partitioned to body reserves.

Long-term palmitic acid supplementation interacts with parity in lactating dairy cows: Production responses, nutrient digestibility, and energy partitioning

The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of long-term palmitic acid (C16:0) supplementation and parity on production, nutrient digestibility, and energy partitioning of mid-lactation dairy cows. Forty mid-lactation Holstein cows (18 primiparous and 22 multiparous) were used in a block design. Cows were assigned to receive either a control diet containing no supplemental fat (CON) or a C16:0-enriched supplemented diet (PA; 1.5% diet dry matter) fed for 10 wk. Compared with CON, PA increased dry matter intake, milk yield, cumulative milk yield, milk fat content, milk fat yield, 16-carbon milk fatty acid (FA) yield, 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield, and energy-corrected milk yield. Additionally, PA increased body weight change, but did not affect body condition score change compared with CON. A tendency for a treatment by parity interaction was observed for milk yield due to PA increasing milk yield in multiparous but not in primiparous cows. In addition, we observed interactions between treatment and parity for fat-corrected milk, energy-corrected milk, and milk fat yield due to PA increasing these variables to a greater extent in multiparous compared with primiparous cows. Interestingly, we observed an interaction between treatment and parity for body weight change, due to PA increasing body weight change in primiparous but not in multiparous cows. The PA treatment increased dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibilities compared with CON. Although PA did not affect 18-carbon FA digestibility, compared with CON, PA decreased 16-carbon and total FA digestibilities and increased total FA intake by 470 g/d and absorbed total FA by 316 g/d. We also observed an interaction between treatment and parity for total absorbed FA due to PA increasing it to a greater extent in multiparous than in primiparous cows. Compared with CON, PA increased apparent energy intake and milk energy output. We observed an interaction between treatment and parity for milk energy output due to PA increasing milk energy output to a greater extent in multiparous than primiparous cows. Additionally, an interaction between treatment and parity was observed for energy output in body reserves due to PA increasing energy output in body reserves in primiparous but not in multiparous cows. In conclusion, production responses of dairy cows to PA were consistent throughout the 10-wk treatment period. In addition, PA supplementation interacted with parity, with production responses increased to a greater extent in multiparous than primiparous cows and energy partitioned to body reserves only increased in primiparous cows.

Altering the ratio of dietary palmitic, stearic, and oleic acids in diets with or without whole cottonseed affects nutrient digestibility, energy partitioning, and production responses of dairy cows

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of varying the ratio of dietary palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0), and oleic (cis-9 C18:1) acids in basal diets containing soyhulls or whole cottonseed on nutrient digestibility, energy partitioning, and production response of lactating dairy cows. Twenty-four mid-lactation multiparous Holstein cows were used in a split-plot Latin square design. Cows were allocated to a main plot receiving either a basal diet with soyhulls (SH, n = 12) or a basal diet with whole cottonseed (CS, n = 12) that was fed throughout the experiment. Within each plot a 4 × 4 Latin square arrangement of treatments was used in 4 consecutive 21-d periods. Treatments were (1) control (CON; no supplemental fat), (2) high C16:0 supplement [PA; fatty acid (FA) supplement blend provided ∼80% C16:0], (3) C16:0 and C18:0 supplement (PA+SA; FA supplement blend provided ∼40% C16:0 + ∼40% C18:0), and (4) C16:0 and cis-9 C18:1 supplement (PA+OA; FA supplement blend provided ∼45% C16:0 + ∼35% cis-9 C18:1). Interactions between basal diets and FA treatments were observed for dry matter intake (DMI) and milk yield. Among the SH diets, PA and PA+SA increased DMI compared with CON and PA+OA treatments, whereas in the CS diets PA+OA decreased DMI compared with CON. The PA, PA+SA, and PA+OA treatments increased milk yield compared with CON in the SH diets. The CS diets increased milk fat yield compared with the SH diets due to the greater yield of de novo and preformed milk FA. The PA treatment increased milk fat yield compared with CON, PA+SA, and PA+OA due to the greater yield of mixed-source (16-carbon) milk FA. The PA treatment increased 3.5% fat-corrected milk compared with CON and tended to increase it compared with PA+SA and PA+OA. The CS diets increased body weight (BW) change compared with the SH diets. Additionally, PA+OA tended to increase BW change compared with CON and PA and increased it in comparison with PA+SA. The PA and PA+OA treatments increased dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibility compared with PA+SA and tended to increase them compared with CON. The PA+SA treatment reduced 16-carbon, 18-carbon, and total FA digestibility compared with the other treatments. The CS diets increased energy partitioning toward body reserves compared with the SH diets. The PA treatment increased energy partitioning toward milk compared with CON and PA+OA and tended to increase it compared with PA+SA. In contrast, PA+OA increased energy partitioned to body reserves compared with PA and PA+SA and tended to increase it compared with CON. In conclusion, milk yield responses to different combinations of FA were affected by the addition of whole cottonseed in the diet. Among the combinations of C16:0, C18:0, and cis-9 C18:1 evaluated, fat supplements with more C16:0 increased energy output in milk, whereas fat supplements with more cis-9 C18:1 increased energy storage in BW. The combination of C16:0 and C18:0 reduced nutrient digestibility, which most likely explains the lower performance observed compared with other treatments.

Short communication: Effects of prill size of a palmitic acid–enriched fat supplement on the yield of milk and milk components, and nutrient digestibility of dairy cows

The objective of our experiment was to evaluate the effects of prill size of a palmitic acid–enriched fatty acid supplement (PA; 85% C16:0) on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and production responses of dairy cows. Twenty-four primiparous and multiparous Holstein cows were assigned based on parity and production level to replicated 4×4 Latin squares balanced for carryover effects with 21-d periods. Treatments were a control diet (no added PA), or 2.0% PA added as a small prill size (PA-SM; 284±12.4µm), a medium prill size (PA-MD; 325±14.7µm), or a large prill size (PA-LG; 600±17.4µm) supplement. Overall, PA treatments increased milk fat content (4.25 vs. 3.99%), milk fat yield (1.48 vs. 1.39kg/d), 3.5% fat-corrected milk (39.2 vs. 37.7kg/d), and improved feed efficiency (fat-corrected milk:dry matter intake; 1.51 vs. 1.42) compared with control. Compared with control, PA treatments did not affect dry matter intake, body weight, body condition score, or yields of milk, protein, and lactose. The PA treatments increased neutral detergent fiber digestibility (44.8 vs. 42.4%) and reduced the digestibility of 16-carbon fatty acids (72.3 vs. 79.1%) and total fatty acids (76.6 vs. 80.3%). Compared with control, PA treatments reduced the contents of de novo synthesized milk fatty acids (23.0 vs. 25.8g/100g of fatty acids) and preformed milk fatty acids (36.3 vs. 39.1g/100g of fatty acids), but did not affect their yields. In contrast, PA treatments increased the content (40.8 vs. 35.1g/100g of fatty acids) and yield (570 vs. 436g/d) of 16-carbon milk fatty acids compared with control. The PA prill size had no effect on dry matter intake, yield of milk and milk components, or feed efficiency. However, PA-LG tended to increase milk fat content compared with PA-SM (4.28 vs. 4.22%), and it increased 16-carbon fatty acid digestibility compared with PA-MD (74.2 vs. 71.0%) and PA-SM (74.2 vs. 71.7%). Additionally, PA-LG increased total fatty acid digestibility compared with PA-MD (78.1 vs. 75.6%) and PA-SM (78.1 vs. 76.0%). Results demonstrate that PA increased milk fat content and yield, and feed efficiency. Reducing prill size decreased fatty acid digestibility, but it had no effect on animal performance under the dietary conditions and prill sizes evaluated.

1332 Comparison of a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement and a calcium salts of palm fatty acids supplement on milk production responses of dairy cows

1332 Comparison of a palmitic acid-enriched triglyceride supplement and a calcium salts of palm fatty acids supplement on milk production responses of dairy cows

0004 Physiologic, health and production responses of dairy cows supplemented with an immunomodulatory feed ingredient during the transition period

0004 Physiologic, health and production responses of dairy cows supplemented with an immunomodulatory feed ingredient during the transition period

Physiologic, health, and production responses of dairy cows supplemented with an immunomodulatory feed ingredient during the transition period

This study compared physiological, health, and productive parameters in dairy cows supplemented or not with Omnigen-AF (OMN; Phibro Animal Health, Teaneck, NJ) during the transition period. Thirty-eight nonlactating, multiparous, pregnant Holstein × Gir cows were ranked by body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS), and assigned to receive (n=19) or not (CON; n=19) OMN at 56 g/cow daily (as-fed basis) beginning 35 d before expected date of calving. Before calving, cows were maintained in single drylot pen with ad libitum access to corn silage, and received (as-fed basis) 3kg/cow daily of a concentrate. After calving, cows were moved to an adjacent drylot pen, milked twice daily, offered (as-fed basis) 35kg/cow daily of corn silage, and individually received a concentrate formulated to meet their nutritional requirements after both milkings. Cows received OMN individually as top-dressing in the morning concentrate feeding. Before calving, cow BW and BCS were recorded weekly and blood samples were collected every 5 d beginning on d −35 relative to expected calving date. After calving and until 46 d in milk, BW and BCS were recorded weekly, individual milk production was recorded, and milk samples were collected daily for total solids and somatic cell count analyses. Blood was sampled daily from 0 to 7 d in milk, every other day from 9 to 21 d in milk, and every 5 d from 26 to 46 d in milk. On 30 and 46 d in milk, cows were evaluated for endometritis via cytobrush technique, based on % of polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells in 100 total cell count (PMN + endometrial cells). On 48.7±1.6 d in milk, 9 cows/treatment received a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection (0.25μg/kg of BW), and blood was sampled hourly from −2 to 8 h, at 12-h intervals from 12 to 72 h, and at 24-h intervals form 96 to 120 h relative to LPS administration. No treatment differences were detected on BW, BCS, serum concentrations of cortisol, fatty acids, insulin, glucose, haptoglobin, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-I. Cows receiving OMN had greater milk yield (30.3 vs. 27.1kg/d) and percentage of PMN cells in endometrial cell population (12.2 vs. 3.9%) compared with CON cows. After LPS administration, cows receiving OMN had greater mean serum haptoglobin (212 vs. 94 µg/mL), as well as greater serum concentration of tumor necrosis factor α at 1, 2, and 3 h relative to LPS injection compared with CON cows. In conclusion, OMN supplementation during the transition period enhanced innate immunity parameters and increased milk production in dairy cows.

Milk production responses to dietary stearic acid vary by production level in dairy cattle

Effects of stearic acid supplementation on feed intake and metabolic and production responses of dairy cows with a wide range of milk production (32.2 to 64.4kg/d) were evaluated in a crossover design experiment with a covariate period. Thirty-two multiparous Holstein cows (142±55 d in milk) were assigned randomly within level of milk yield to treatment sequence. Treatments were diets supplemented (2% of diet dry matter) with stearic acid (SA; 98% C18:0) or control (soyhulls). The diets were based on corn silage and alfalfa and contained 24.5% forage neutral detergent fiber, 25.1% starch, and 17.3% crude protein. Treatment periods were 21 d with the final 4 d used for data and sample collection. Compared with the control, SA increased dry matter intake (DMI; 26.1 vs. 25.2kg/d) and milk yield (40.2 vs. 38.5kg/d). Stearic acid had no effect on the concentration of milk components but increased yields of fat (1.42 vs. 1.35kg/d), protein (1.19 vs. 1.14kg/d), and lactose (1.96 vs. 1.87kg/d). The SA treatment increased 3.5% fat-corrected milk (3.5% FCM; 40.5 vs. 38.6kg/d) but did not affect feed efficiency (3.5% FCM/DMI, 1.55 vs. 1.53), body weight, or body condition score compared with the control. Linear interactions between treatment and level of milk yield during the covariate period were detected for DMI and yields of milk, fat, protein, lactose, and 3.5% FCM; responses to SA were positively related to milk yield of cows. The SA treatment increased crude protein digestibility (67.4 vs. 65.5%), tended to increase neutral detergent fiber digestibility (43.6 vs. 42.3%), decreased fatty acid (FA) digestibility (56.6 vs. 76.1%), and did not affect organic matter digestibility. Fatty acid yield response, calculated as the additional FA yield secreted in milk per unit of additional FA intake, was only 13.3% for total FA and 8.2% for C18:0 plus cis-9 C18:1. Low estimated digestibility of the SA supplement was at least partly responsible for the low FA yield response. Treatment did not affect plasma insulin, glucagon, glucose, and nonesterified FA concentrations. Results show that stearic acid has the potential to increase DMI and yields of milk and milk components, without affecting conversion of feed to milk, body condition score, or body weight. Moreover, effects on DMI and yields of milk and milk components were more pronounced for higher-yielding cows than for lower-yielding cows.

Milk production and composition of mid-lactation cows consuming perennial ryegrass-and chicory-based diets

Dry matter intakes (DMI), nutrient selection, and milk production responses of dairy cows grazing 3 herbage-based diets offered at 2 allowances were measured. The 2 allowances were 20 (low) and 30 (high) kg of dry matter (DM)/cow per day and these were applied to 3 herbage types: perennial ryegrass (PRG) and chicory (CHIC+) monocultures and a mixed sward of chicory and perennial ryegrass (MIX). The CHIC+ diet was supplemented with alfalfa hay (approximately 2kg of DM/cow per day) to maintain dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration and all diets were supplemented with energy-based pellets (6kg of DM/cow per day). Holstein-Friesian dairy cows averaging 136±30 d in milk were allocated to 4 replicates of the 6 treatments using stratified randomization procedures. Cows were adapted to their experimental diets over a 14-d period, with measurements of DMI, milk yield, and composition conducted over the following 10 d. Herbage DMI was lowest (12.8 vs. 14.0kg of DM/d) for CHIC+ compared with the MIX and PRG, although total forage intake (grazed herbage plus hay) was similar (14.0 to 15.0kg of DM/d) across the 3 treatments. Milk production, milk protein, and milk fat concentrations were not different between herbage types. Grazed herbage DMI increased with increasing herbage allowance and this was associated with increased milk protein concentration (3.23 to 3.34%) and total casein production (41.7 to 43.6mg/g). Concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk fat, particularly linoleic acid, were increased in milk from cows offered the CHIC+ or the MIX diets, indicating potential benefits of chicory herbage on milk fatty acid concentrations. Although feeding CHIC+ or MIX did not increase milk yield, these herbage types could be used as an alternative to perennial ryegrass pasture in spring.

Immune and production responses of dairy cows to postruminal supplementation with phytonutrients

This study investigated the effect of phytonutrients (PN) supplied postruminally on nutrient utilization, gut microbial ecology, immune response, and productivity of lactating dairy cows. Eight ruminally cannulated Holstein cows were used in a replicated 4×4 Latin square. Experimental periods lasted 23d, including 14-d washout and 9-d treatment periods. Treatments were control (no PN) and daily doses of 2g/cow of either curcuma oleoresin (curcumin), garlic extract (garlic), or capsicum oleoresin (capsicum). Phytonutrients were pulse-dosed into the abomasum of the cows, through the rumen cannula, 2h after feeding during the last 9d of each experimental period. Dry matter intake was not affected by PN, although it tended to be lower for the garlic treatment compared with the control. Milk yield was decreased (2.2kg/d) by capsicum treatment compared with the control. Feed efficiency, milk composition, milk fat and protein yields, milk N efficiency, and 4.0% fat-corrected milk yield were not affected by treatment. Rumen fermentation variables, apparent total-tract digestibility of nutrients, N excretion with feces and urine, and diversity of fecal bacteria were also not affected by treatment. Phytonutrients had no effect on blood chemistry, but the relative proportion of lymphocytes was increased by the capsicum treatment compared with the control. All PN increased the proportion of total CD4+ cells and total CD4+ cells that co-expressed the activation status signal and CD25 in blood. The percentage of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) that proliferated in response to concanavalin A and viability of PBMC were not affected by treatment. Cytokine production by PBMC was not different between control and PN. Expression of mRNA in liver for key enzymes in gluconeogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and response to reactive oxygen species were not affected by treatment. No difference was observed due to treatment in the oxygen radical absorbance capacity of blood plasma but, compared with the control, garlic treatment increased 8-isoprostane levels. Overall, the PN used in this study had subtle or no effects on blood cells and blood chemistry, nutrient digestibility, and fecal bacterial diversity, but appeared to have an immune-stimulatory effect by activating and inducing the expansion of CD4 cells in dairy cows. Capsicum treatment decreased milk yield, but this and other effects observed in this study should be interpreted with caution because of the short duration of treatment.

Production responses of lactating dairy cows fed silage-based diets to changes in nutrient supply

The objective of this meta-analysis was to develop empirical prediction equations for milk and milk component yields using energy and protein intake and dietary composition as independent variables. A dataset of 1125 dietary treatment means from 245 production studies in dairy cows was collected. The diets were mainly based on grass silage or grass silage partly or completely replaced by leguminous or whole crop silages. Concentrates were fed on a flat rate basis. They were composed of cereal grains, fibrous by-products and different protein supplements. Dietary characteristics [crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), starch, non-fibre carbohydrates (NFC) and silage fermentation] and feed values [metabolizable energy (ME) and protein (MP), ruminal CP balance and Feed MP] were recorded in the dataset. Production variables showed wide ranges: days in milk (38–232), dry matter (DM) intake (9.9–25.2kg/d), and yields of milk (MY; 13.0–45.8)kg/d, energy corrected milk (ECM; 12.8–43.5kg), fat (479–1830g/d) and protein (PY, 359–1449g/d). Mixed model regression analysis with a random study effect was used to develop prediction equations for MY, ECM and PY. The best-fit models for MY and ECM included linear and quadratic effects of ME intake available for production (MEI) and concentrations of NFC and concentrate fat and linear effect of Feed MP concentration as significant variables, the effect of MEI intake being most pronounced. Correcting ME intake for feeding level and associative effects of dietary composition further improved the fit of the models. The best-fit equation for PY included linear effect of MEI and linear and quadratic effects of Feed MP intake and dietary concentrations of NFC and concentrate fat. The adjusted root mean squared errors were 0.424kg/d, 0.497kg/d and 15.2g/d for MY and ECM and PY equations, respectively. Cross-validation errors were only marginally greater than calibration errors with almost all error variance due to random variation. The basic structure of the models confirmed the well established concept of diminishing milk and milk component returns with incremental increases in nutrient intake. The results demonstrated that the models predicted production responses of dairy cows to the changes in nutrient supply with a reasonable accuracy. It is concluded that the models can be used in the optimization of dairy cow rations on practical farms to maximize milk income over feed costs.

Response to High-Lysine Proteins to Supplement Diets Based on Distillers Dried Grains plus Solubles for Lactating Cows

Three experiments were performed to evaluate production responses of dairy cows fed distillers dried grains plus solubles (DDGS) supplemented with other protein sources. In Exp. 1 and 2, identical DDGS were used, at 0 to 18.7% of dietary DM in Exp. 1 and at 13 or 18.2% in Exp. 2. The source of DDGS in Exp. 3 was different. Experiments 1 and 2 used alfalfa silage as the sole forage, whereas Exp. 3 included corn silage. Adding blood meal to the DDGS diets improved performance similarly in Exp. 1 and 2. The basal DDGS diet did not respond to additional RDP but was responsive to added Lys. The diets containing DDGS plus blood meal did not respond to supplemental rumen-protected Met or Met plus Lys. However, adding blood meal to the DDGS diets did not result in production equal to the positive control diet containing both blood meal and soybean meal. In Exp. 3, diets with DDGS at 13 and 18% of dietary DM were supplemented with Aminoplus (Ag Processing Inc., Omaha, NE), a soy-based source of RUP. Diets with DDGS at 18% of dietary DM were also supplemented with commodity soybean meal, blood meal, blood and fish meal, or Aminoplus and blood meal. No significant differences were found across treatments for DMI; milk yield; milk protein, fat, and lactose; milk fat percentage; or protein percentage. Diets with DDGS as the primary protein supplement can respond to supplemental Lys, as Lys or blood meal, but the source of DDGS can influence the magnitude of the response.

Production responses of dairy cows when fed supplemental fat in low- and high-forage diets

Intake of net energy for lactation (NEL) is often the limiting factor for milk production and is affected by stage of lactation and dietary concentrations of forage and fat. Because of the mechanisms involved, interactions are likely between those 2 diet components and stage of lactation. We conducted an experiment with 72 Holstein cows starting at 21 and ending at 126 d in milk (DIM). Cows were fed diets (dry matter basis) with 40 or 60% forage (67% corn silage, 33% alfalfa silage) each with 0 or 2.25% added saturated free fatty acids. The high- and low-forage diets contained 25 and 17% forage neutral detergent fiber and 30 and 33% total neutral detergent fiber, respectively; the low-forage diets contained several byproducts. Diets with and without fat contained approximately 5.2 and 3.2% long-chain fatty acids, respectively. Feeding fat or low-forage diets increased NEL intake, but no interaction was observed. The increase in NEL intake by cows fed low-forage diets was caused by increased dry matter intake, and the increase in NEL intake by cows fed fat was caused by increased energy density of the diet. Interactions between fat and forage were observed for energy utilization. When high-forage diets were supplemented with fat, the increased NEL intake went toward body energy reserves as measured by higher body condition scores with no change in milk yield. However, when low-forage diets were supplemented with fat, milk yield increased (2.6kg/d) with no change in body condition. The differential partitioning of NEL may have been caused by nutrients other than NEL limiting milk production in cows fed the high-forage diets. With low-forage diets, intake of other nutrients was greater (i.e., greater dry matter intake). At 35 DIM, dietary treatments had little effect on milk fatty acids composition but in later lactation (125 DIM), feeding supplemental fatty acids or feeding low-forage diets increased long-chain fatty acids and decreased short-chain fatty acids. However, treatment did not have marked effects on concentrations of total fat or protein in milk. The amount of forage in a diet influences cow responses to supplemental fat and should be considered when diets are formulated.