I N the following paper and clinic it is purposed to consider ort.horlont ic appliances,-not in any exhaustive way, but rather from the viewpoint of some of the limitations which ought to be borne in mind in daily clinical practice. In discussing the bad features and limitations of appliances, onc must ]'C'member that appliances are mechanical devices for exerting pressure on 111<)1posed teeth, thereby influencing cell metabolism with a view of causing the teeth to assume their correct functional relationship. Dr. John V. Mershon defines functional relationship in this wav. 'While we are moving the teeth from their positions of malocclusion to normal fl11J('tional relations, the tissues surrounding and supporting the teeth will so adapt and adjust themsel ves through an interaction of forces, that the proper equil ihrium between teeth and tissues is maintained during the whole process of tooth movement. Going further, he says: Appliances are effective in proportion as they apply force in the direction of normal growth, and in so rlointr, do not interfere with the function of any of the tissues associated with the teeth. or with the teeth themselves collectively or individually; each tooth lwing free to functionate normally. An appliance in conformity with absolute harmony between normal grO\vth and the stimulation of the supporting tissues would be ideal; but as yet, there is no ideal appliance. All types of appliances thus far devizcd have some admittedly bad features, and successful orthodontia is not altogether due to the appliances employed. Orthodontia depending entirely on the appliances often comes to grief in its ultimate results. In the past orthodontia consisted in aligning irregular teeth. Now, we believe we are treating oral deformities, partially or wholly interfering with normal function. In the past, the object in view was to push or pull teeth into position in the quickest wa~-,-l'cgal'Cliess of the results. Now, we understand that no mechanical device can make an absolutely perfect normal occlusion. The individual size and shape of the teeth and the gradual growth of the associated oral structures plav all important part. No appliance working alone can accomplish the ultimate good sought. , proper appliance should be only a stimulus to supporting tissues of the tooth by pressure applied to it. It should work in conjunction with, and at the same time in opposition to the natural stimulus of growth going' on in these tissues, The dental arch as a part of the individual grows with the individual,
Read full abstract