Reimbursement For Procedures Research Articles

Trends in Medicare Reimbursement and Service Volume of Vitreoretinal Procedures: 2000 to 2021.

Purpose: To characterize trends in service volume and inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement of vitreoretinal procedures over the past 2 decades. Methods: Medicare Part B National Summary Data Files were accessed to identify the number of allowed services for vitreoretinal procedures. The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule was accessed to identify average annual national reimbursement rates. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate time trends for each procedure. All analyses were conducted using Prism 9.5.1 software with 2-sided significance testing and statistical significance set at P ≤ .05. Results: From 2000 to 2021, the 2-tailed Spearman correlation showed that 20 of 38 procedures had statistically significant decreases in service volume over time. Intravitreal injections increased more than 1000-fold, from 2922 in 2000 to 3 444 500 injections in 2021 (ρ = 0.997; P < .001). Panretinal photocoagulation treatments declined from 104 865 to 48 533 procedures (ρ = -0.966; P = .003). Scleral buckling declined from 6502 to 587 procedures (ρ = -0.999; P < .001). Pars plana vitrectomy-associated procedures increased from 71 039 to 95 429 (ρ = 0.691; P < .001). From 2000 to 2021, the 2-tailed Spearman correlation showed that 29 of 38 procedures had statistically significant decreases in reimbursement over time. No procedure had a significant increase in payment. Conclusions: Vitreoretinal practice patterns have changed dramatically over the past 2 decades, with significant declines in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for most procedures. Awareness of service volume and reimbursement trends is vital to assessing economic viability and patient coverage under the current Medicare payment policies.

Market Factors, Not Quality, Influence Reimbursement for Pancreaticoduodenectomy in an Era of Price Transparency.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) price transparency rule tries to facilitate cost-conscious decision-making. For surgical services, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), factors mediating transparency and real-world reimbursement are not well described. The Leapfrog Survey was used to identify United States hospitals performing PD. Financial and operational data were obtained from Turquoise Health and CMS Cost Reports. Chi-square tests and modified Poisson regression evaluated associations with reimbursement disclosure. Two-part logistic and gamma regression models estimated effects of hospital factors on commercial, Medicare, and self-pay reimbursements for PD. Of 452 Leapfrog hospitals, 295 (65%) disclosed PD hospital or procedure reimbursements. Disclosing hospitals were larger (beds >200: 81.0% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.04), reported higher net margins (0.7% vs. -2.1%, p = 0.04), more likely for-profit (26.1% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001), and teaching-affiliated (82.0% vs. 65.6%, p < 0.001). Nonprofit status conferred hospitalization reimbursement increases of $8683-$12,329, while moderate market concentration predicted savings up to $5066. Teaching affiliation conferred reimbursement increases of $4589-$16,393 for hospitalizations and $644 for procedures. Top Leapfrog volume ratings predicted an increase of up to $7795 for only Medicare hospitalization reimbursement. Nondisclosure of hospital and procedural reimbursements for PD remains a major issue. Transparency was noted in hospitals with higher margins, size, and academic affiliation. Factors associated with higher reimbursement were non-profit status, academic affiliation, and more equitable market share. Reimbursement inconsistently tracked with PD quality or volume measures. Policy changes may be required to incentivize reimbursement disclosure and translate transparency into increased value for patients.

A Cohort Study Comparing Cost-Efficiency of Abdominal and Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

ObjectivesTo compare cost and reimbursement of robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy procedures to evaluate which approach may minimize costs while improving the hospital profit margin-. MethodsWe performed an IRB-exempt retrospective cohort study investigating all patients who underwent robotic or abdominal sacrocolpopexy at our hospital between July 1, 2018 and May 31,2022. Patient demographic, procedural, and post-operative course data were extracted via chart review including duration of procedure, time in operating room, complications, and length of hospital stay. The billing department provided information on estimated cost of stay and reimbursement rates. ResultsA total of 203 robotic and 291 abdominal cases were included in analysis. The groups had significant differences in demographics, including race and insurance status. Abdominal procedures were associated with lower costs ($7675.99 versus 8747.48, p<0.0001) and higher reimbursement rates ($16210.48 versus $10102.28, p<0.0001), with the total collected (reimbursement minus cost), or profit margin, differing significantly ($8534.50 versus $1354.80, p<0.0001). Discrepancies in reimbursement and profit remained after controlling for secondary procedures. Abdominal cases also had shorter average duration (129.9 vs. 168.4 minutes, p<0.0001). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy was associated with higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (109.2 vs. 97.9, p<0.0001) and longer hospital stay (26.3 versus 15.9 hours, p<0.0001). ConclusionsDespite longer hospital stays and slightly higher EBL, abdominal sacrocolpopexy appears to have lower costs and higher reimbursement rates than robotic sacrocolpopexy, with a higher profit margin for the hospital.

The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Anatomic Pathology

Abstract Introduction/Objective Lack of an annual inflationary update for physician reimbursement from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) jeopardizes access to anatomic pathology services at healthcare institutions nationwide. The effects of recent inflationary trends on anatomic pathology physician reimbursement are unknown. Thus, our study sought to analyze trends in Medicare reimbursement rates from 2004 to 2024 for anatomic pathology procedures. Methods/Case Report The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the CMS was queried for the top 30 CPT codes utilized, and physician reimbursement data extracted. Monetary data was subsequently adjusted for inflation utilizing the Consumer Price Index and reported in 2024 US dollars. The average annual and total percent change in reimbursement were calculated for included procedures. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated using 2024 and 2000 inflation-adjusted monetary data. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Prior to adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement increased by 9.7% from 2004 to 2024 for all included anatomic pathology CPT codes. After adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement decreased by 34.2% for included CPT codes. The greatest decrease in reimbursement observed from 2004 to 2024 was for outside slide consultation at 60.5% ($330.12 to $130.49), followed by pathology consultation during surgery at 59.0% ($83.54 to $34.29). The average CAGR was -2.19%. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that Medicare physician reimbursement for common anatomic pathology procedures is declining annually at an unsustainable rate. This downward trend necessitates policy action to prevent access barriers to quality anatomic pathology care nationwide, especially for Medicare beneficiaries.

The Decline of Medicare Reimbursement in Clinical Pathology

Abstract Introduction/Objective Access to clinical pathology services nationwide is threatened by the lack of an annual inflationary update for physician reimbursement from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS). Most recently, the 2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) implemented an overall 2.0% reduction in pathology reimbursement. The effects of recent inflationary trends on clinical pathology physician reimbursement are unknown. Thus, our study sought to analyze trends in Medicare reimbursement rates from 2004 to 2024 for clinical pathology procedures. Methods/Case Report The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the CMS was queried for the top 30 CPT codes utilized, and physician reimbursement data extracted. Monetary data was subsequently adjusted for inflation utilizing the Consumer Price Index and reported in 2024 US dollars. The average annual and total percent change in reimbursement were calculated for included procedures. A subset analysis was conducted to assess physician pathology clinical consultation services average annual and total percent change in reimbursement pre- and post- 2022 MPFS Update. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated using 2024 and 2000 inflation- adjusted monetary data. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Prior to adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement decreased by 6.8% from 2004 to 2024 for included clinical pathology CPT codes. After adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement decreased by 44.0% for included CPT codes. The greatest decrease in reimbursement observed from 2004 to 2024 was for flow cytometry interpretation, 2-8 minutes at 69.5% ($114.44 to $34.95) followed by flow cytometry interpretation, 9-15 minutes at 57.8% ($142.77 to $60.25) and flow cytometry interpretation, &amp;gt;16 minutes at 56.6% ($188.05 to $81.55). The average CAGR was -2.86%. Prior to adjusting for inflation, the average physician reimbursement for clinical pathology consultation services pre-2022 decreased by 0.9%, and when adjusted for inflation, decreased by 30.0%. Post-2022 MPFS revision, the average physician reimbursement for clinical pathology consultation services decreased by 3.5%, and when adjusted for inflation, decreased by 12.2%. The average CAGR pre-2022 was -2.0% and post-2022 was -4.3%. Conclusion Medicare physician reimbursement for common clinical pathology procedures is decreasing at an untenable rate annually. It is critical that policymakers understand these trends to ensure continued access to quality clinical pathology care at healthcare institutions.

Ambulatory surgery center versus outpatient hospitals: a comparison of reimbursements for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Background ContextWhile some studies have demonstrated that ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are associated with reduced costs of orthopedic procedures, there is no consensus in the current literature as to the impact of ASCs versus hospital-based outpatient departments (HOPDs) on anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs). PurposeThis study sought to (1) compare immediate procedure reimbursements, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursements for ACDFs performed at ASCs versus HOPDs and (2) identify factors predicting facility utilization. Study DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study. Patient SampleWe identified ACDF procedures performed at an ASC or HOPD in commercially-insured patients aged 18 to 64. Outcome MeasuresPayment variables were calculated from claims within 3 days preoperatively and postoperatively. MethodsMultivariable regression models assessed (1) associations between the surgery setting and payment variables and (2) factors associated with the surgery setting. ResultsWe included 18,191 ACDFs (14.8% ASC, 85.2% HOPD). In multivariable analyses, ACDFs performed in an ASC (versus HOPD) were associated with 9.8% higher immediate procedure reimbursements (95% CI:7.5%–12.2%), 17.2% higher patient out-of-pocket expenditures (95% CI:11.8–22.8), and 11.7% higher surgeon reimbursements (95% CI:9.18–14.2; all p<.01) (all p<.001). Surgery setting utilization varied by region, insurance-related factors, comorbidities, and procedural complexity. ConclusionsWe found that ASCs had significantly higher reimbursements compared to HOPDs. Regional variations in ASC utilization imply there are opportunities for standardization of care. Level of evidence3.

Medicare Reimbursement and Utilization Trends Within Skull Base Surgery

Medicare reimbursements for otolaryngology and neurosurgery procedures have generally declined since 2000. We explore Medicare reimbursement trends for anterior cranial fossa, middle cranial fossa, posterior cranial fossa, pituitary surgery, and skull base reconstruction surgery from 2000-2022. Cross-sectional analysis of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule was performed from 2000-2022 on approach, resection, and repair of the skull base (Current Procedural Terminology codes 31290-31291, 61546, 61548, 61575-61619, and 62165). Reimbursement data were adjusted for inflation to 2022 U.S. dollars, and annual and total changes calculated. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part B National Summary Data File was analyzed for trends in Medicare procedure volume and total payment. Adjusted for inflation since 2000, reimbursements for anterior cranial fossa, middle cranial fossa, posterior cranial fossa, pituitary surgery, and skull base reconstruction codes had an overall decrease of 22.85%, 32.43%, 28.09%, 44.22%, and 38.65%, respectively. Simultaneously, procedure volume increased at an average annual rate of 63.99%, 128.57%, 19.75%, 36.11%, and 12.79%, respectively. While nominal per-service Medicare reimbursement has increased for skull base surgery codes, there has been a downward trend in inflation-adjusted procedural reimbursement. This parallels findings in other otolaryngology and neurosurgery procedures. Despite this, surgical volume in all skull base surgery subfields has increased, indicating increased utility and adoption of these techniques.

Changes in Medicare Reimbursement for Top Burn Surgery Procedures by State Between 2011 and 2022.

This study analyzed the geographic variation in annual Medicare reimbursement changes for common burn surgery procedures from 2011 to 2022 to clarify trends in reimbursement. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Physician fee schedule database was analyzed to find state-by-state reimbursement rates for the most common burn surgery procedures. Physician reimbursement was adjusted for inflation utilizing the consumer price index. Procedures were weighted according to frequency, and an inflation-adjusted percent change was identified for each state. Since 2011, the inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for the top burn surgery procedures for all U.S. states decreased by a yearly average of 2.67%. Washington (-2.17%), New York (-2.31%), Oregon (-2.33%), and the District of Columbia (-2.35%) showed the smallest annual percent change. Illinois (-3.34%), Mississippi (-3.04%), Idaho (-2.99%), and Michigan (-2.96%) were the states with the greatest annual decrease. The most common procedures included initial treatment of burns (16000), burn dressing and debridement (16020, 16025, 16030), and burn eschar incision (16035). Medicare reimbursement for burn surgery procedures decreased from 2011 to 2022. The geographic variance in reimbursement patterns may incentivize physicians to pursue other surgical specialties or practice in certain areas which could limit access to care in low reimbursement areas. Further research is needed to examine disparities that may have arisen due to decreasing reimbursement over the last decade. New action is also needed to moderate diminishing burn surgery reimbursement to ensure quality care for Medicare beneficiaries in low-reimbursement states.

Framework for Successful Integration of Health Services Research Into a Breast Imaging Career.

Health services research (HSR)is a multidisciplinary field of inquiry that examines how health care is structured, providing valuable data on health care outcomes and delivery. Over the past few decades, a shift in the U.S. health care system toward value-based care has placed a priority on health services topics. Health services research has been central to the evolution of breast imaging over this period, with increased emphasis placed on the following: (1) design of appropriate-use criteria for imaging services; (2) determination of cost-effectiveness of imaging protocols and screening regimens guiding policy; and (3) evaluation of policy related to reimbursement for diagnostic imaging and image-guided procedures. Examples of HSR topics that can be applied directly to breast imaging include evaluation of health care availability and accessibility, analysis of health care use patterns, exploration of patient preferences, assessment of technological innovation, development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines and screening strategies, and examination of health care organization and delivery models. Breast imaging radiologists who perform HSR are uniquely positioned to advocate for patients, to promote transformative health care interventions, and to influence policy changes and public health initiatives in breast imaging through analysis of health care data and translation of their research findings. In this Training and Professional Development article, we aim to provide practical approaches to explore interest in HSR and to describe a framework for successful integration of HSR into a breast imaging career.

Medicaid Reimbursement for Common Orthopedic Trauma Procedures is 16.0% Less Compared to Medicare with Substantial Variability Between States.

This study seeks to evaluate the variability of Medicaid reimbursement and compare it to Medicare reimbursement using the 20 most commonly billed orthopedic trauma CPT codes nationwide. The authors anticipate significant variability between states and hypothesize that Medicaid payment will be significantly less than Medicare payment. The top 20 most common orthopedic trauma surgery procedural codes were identified from a previous analysis performed by Haglin et al.1 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services physician fee schedule was used to determine reimbursement rates from Medicare, and state Medicaid fee schedules were used to determine reimbursement rates for Medicaid. State Medicaid rates were compared to their corresponding Medicare rates to determine a dollar difference. Additionally, the dollar difference for each CPT code was divided by its respective physician relative value unit (RVU). This was utilized to acknowledge the possible variability in the complexity of orthopedic procedures and the related physician effort. The Medicare Wage Index was used to adjust Medicaid rates based on the cost of living for the state as well. Coefficients of variation were calculated to represent overall variability in Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates. The mean reimbursement rates for Medicaid were lower for all 20 procedures compared to Medicare. On average, Medicaid reimbursed 16.0% less than Medicare, and 29.6% less when adjusting for cost-of-living. MCD reimbursed at a higher rate than MCR for all procedures in only nine states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, and North Dakota, and South Dakota) while 38 states reimbursed at a lower rate than MCR, on average. The coefficient of variation ranged from 0.24 to 0.34 for the Medicaid unadjusted group and from 0.35 to 0.46 for the Medicare Wage-Index adjusted group. In contrast, the Medicare group was consistent at 0.06 for all 20 procedures. The average dollar difference across the 20 CPT codes for Medicaid reimbursement compared to Medicare ranged from -$76.89 to -$225.17, and the dollar difference per relative value unit ranged from -$5.96 to -$15.16. This study found a high amount of variation between state Medicaid reimbursement rates and average rates that were significantly lower than Medicare reimbursement rates for the top twenty most utilized orthopedic trauma CPT codes as identified by Haglin et al. The discrepancy in reimbursement was increased when Medicaid rates were adjusted for state cost-of-living. Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Implementation of Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion: Addressing Market Access Challenges.

Background: The traditional open midline posterior cervical spine fusion procedure has several shortcomings. It can cause soft tissue damage, muscle atrophy, compromise of the lateral masses and painful prominent posterior cervical instrumentation or spinous process if there is dehiscence of the fascia. Additionally, patients frequently experience the rapid development of adjacent segment disease, which can result in the reemergence of debilitating pain and functional impairment. Clinical relevance: Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion is an alternative method for treating patients with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. However, widespread clinical adoption has been challenged by ambiguity, misunderstandings and misinterpretations regarding appropriate procedural reimbursement coding. Technological advancement: The tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion procedure was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 (CORUS™ Spinal System and CAVUX® Facet Fixation System (CORUS/CAVUX); Providence™ Medical Technology). This technique addresses the concerns with traditional spine fusion methods by achieving the stability and outcomes of posterior cervical fusion without the morbidity associated with significant muscle stripping in the traditional approach. This technology uses specialized implants and instrumentation to perform all of the steps required to facilitate bone fusion and provide stability while minimizing tissue disruption. The technique involves extensive bone preparation for fusion and placement of specialized stabilization implants that span the facet joint, promoting natural bone growth and fusion while reducing the need for extensive exposure. This procedure provides an effective, less invasive solution for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease. Reimbursement and coding clarity: The article provides a comprehensive rationale for appropriate reimbursement coding for tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion. This is a critical aspect for the adoption and accessibility of medical technologies. This information is crucial for practitioners and healthcare administrators, ensuring that innovative procedures are accurately coded and reimbursed. Procedural details and clinical evidence: By detailing the procedural steps, instruments used and the physiological basis for the procedure, this article serves as a valuable educational resource for spine surgeons and payers to appropriately code for this procedure. Conclusions: The description of work for CORUS/CAVUX is equivalent to the current surgical standard of lateral mass screw fixation with decortication and onlay posterior grafting to facilitate posterior fusion. Thus, it is recommended that CPT codes 22600/22840 be used, as they best reflect the surgical approach, instrumentation, decortication, posterior cervical fusion and bone grafting procedures.

Medicaid Reimbursement for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A State-by-State Analysis Compared With Medicare

BackgroundMedicare (MCR) reimbursement for arthroplasty procedures has been declining, but little has been reported on Medicaid (MCD) reimbursement. We sought to determine MCD reimbursement rates using state MCD data for nine arthroplasty procedure codes and compare them to MCR rates. MethodsThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services physician fee schedule was used to collect MCR reimbursement rates, and state MCD fee schedules were accessed to collect MCD rates for nine procedures encompassing primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. State MCR and MCD rates were compared to determine the mean dollar difference and dollar difference per relative value unit. A cost of living adjustment was performed using the Medicare Wage Index for each state. Coefficients of variation were calculated for each state to determine overall variability between the two systems. ResultsThe mean reimbursement rates for MCD were lower for eight of the nine codes used in the study. Medicaid reimbursed physicians an average of 11.3% less overall and 23.1% less when adjusted for cost of living. The amount of variability in the MCR rates was low with a consistent coefficient of variation of 0.06, but was higher in the MCD rates with a range of 0.26 to 0.29 in the unadjusted rates and 0.34 to 0.37 in the adjusted rates. There was a mean $6.73 decreased reimbursement per relative value unit for MCD procedures. ConclusionsFor the most common arthroplasty procedures, MCD reimbursed physicians less than MCR on average. MCD also demonstrated increased variability when compared to MCR rates between states.

Patient Perception of Physician Reimbursement by Medicare for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

Patient perceptions of physician reimbursement commonly differ from actual reimbursement. This study aims to improve health care cost transparency and trust between patients, physicians, and the health care system by evaluating patient perceptions of Medicare reimbursement for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. We identified patients who underwent AUS placement at a single institution from 2014 to 2023. After obtaining informed consent, we administered a telephone survey to ask patients about their perceptions of Medicare reimbursement for AUS surgery and the amount they felt the physician should be compensated. Sixty-four patients were enrolled and completed the survey. On average, patients estimated Medicare physician reimbursement to be $18,920, 25 times the actual average procedure reimbursement. Once informed that the actual amount was $757.52, 97% of respondents felt that the reimbursement was "somewhat lower" (13%) or "much lower" (84%) than what they considered fair. The average amount that patients felt the physician should be paid was $8,844, 12 times the actual average procedure reimbursement. Fifty-four percent of patients estimated their physician's reimbursement to be higher than what they later reported as being "fair," representing a presurvey belief that their physician was overpaid. Patient perceptions of physician reimbursement for AUS are vastly different than the actual amount paid. The discordance between patient perception and actual reimbursement could impact how patients view health care costs and the relationship with their provider.

A Dwindling Matter: An Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement for Endocrine Surgery Procedures from 2000-23.

To evaluate Medicare reimbursement trends for endocrine surgeries from 2000-23. As the population ages, demand for endocrine surgeries is expected to increase. Understanding reimbursement trends is essential to ensure the financial sustainability of endocrine surgery. Data were extracted from Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient Hospital datasets, National Summary, and Physician Fee Look-up Files for nine common thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal surgeries. Data were adjusted for inflation. Descriptive statistics, compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and linear regression models were built to evaluate practice and reimbursement trends. From 2000-23, there was a 63.8% increase in endocrine surgery volume. However, inflation-adjusted average procedure reimbursements decreased by 43.2% from $1709 to $972 (CAGR -2.4%), which is the largest decrease for any surgical subspecialty reported in the published literature. At the current CAGR, the average estimated reimbursement is projected to decrease to $868 by 2030 (P<0.001). Average facility reimbursements for inpatient and outpatient hospitalizations increased. However, substantial practice pattern shifts in the study period led to decreased overall facility reimbursements, with a $17.9 million decrease in total inpatient reimbursements between 2016-21 that was only partially offset by a $3.2 million increase in outpatient hospital reimbursements. Medicare procedure reimbursements for endocrine surgeries have been outpaced by inflation, with large decreases since 2000. Concurrent changes in practice patterns have also resulted in markedly fewer inpatient stays leading to lower total facility reimbursements. Our data raise concern over the financial sustainability of the endocrine surgery field as the demand for endocrine surgery procedures increases.

Comparing Relative Value Units for Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Procedures to Common Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeries to Determine Adequate Compensation.

Reimbursement for surgical procedures is determined by a computation of the relative value unit (RVU) associated with CPT codes. It is based on the amount of work required to provide a service, resources available, and level of expertise involved. Given the evolution of changes in the limb lengthening field, we wanted to evaluate whether the RVU values were comparable across different orthopaedic subspecialties. Consequently, this study compares the work relative value unit (wRVU) totals of 3 common pediatric orthopaedic surgeries-arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and antegrade femoral intramedullary limb lengthening. This was an IRB-approved, multicenter, retrospective chart review. Charts of subjects who had ACL reconstructions, including meniscal repairs; spinal fusion surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (7 to 12 levels), including Ponte osteotomies, and femoral antegrade internal limb lengthening procedures, each completed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed. Comparisons were carried out between several parameters, including mean duration per procedure, number of CPT codes billed per procedure, number of postoperative visits in the 90-day global period, and the wRVU for each procedure. Fifty charts (25 per center) per procedure were reviewed. The wRVU per hour was lowest in the antegrade femur lengthening group ( P < 0.0001). The number of postoperative visits in the 90-day global postsurgery period was significantly higher in the antegrade femur lengthening group ( P < 0.0001). Intramedullary limb lengthening also had the least number of CPT codes billed. RVUs per time are statistically lowest in the limb lengthening group and highest in the scoliosis group. The limb lengthening patient also requires significantly more visits and time in the postoperative period compared with the other groups. These extra visits during the global period do not add any RVU value to the lengthening surgeon and occupy clinic spots that could be filled with new patients. Based on these data, a review of the RVU values assigned to the limb lengthening codes may be necessary. Level III-retrospective comparison study.

The work relative value estimation assessment in China: an empirical research for common surgical procedures.

China's National Health Service Items Standard (NHSIS) establishes a relative value system and plays an important role in pricing. However, there are few empirical evaluations of the objectivity of the NHSIS-estimated relative value. This paper presents a comparison between physician work relative value units (wRVUs) estimates for 70 common surgical procedures from NHSIS and those from the U.S. Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). We defined the ratio of the wRVUs for sample procedures to the benchmark procedure (inguinal hernia repair) as a standardized relative value unit (SRVU), which was used to standardize the data for both schedules. We examined the variances in the ranking and quantification of SRVUs across specialties and procedures, as well as how SRVUs impact procedure reimbursement prices between the two schedules. There was no systematic difference between MHSIS-estimated SRVUs and MPFS-estimated, but the dispersion of MPFS-estimated SRVU was greater than that of MHSIS-estimated, and the discrepancies increased with surgical risk and technical complexity. The discrepancies of SRVUs were significant in cardiothoracic procedures. Additionally, whether SRVUs were based on MPFS or MHSIS, there was a positive association between them and payment prices. However, in terms of the impact of SRVUs on payment pricing, the NHSIS system was lower than the MPFS system. China has made incremental progress in estimating the relative value of healthcare services, but there are shortcomings in valuation methods and their impact on pricing. The modular assessment method should be considered as a component to optimize reform.

Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for Common Pediatric Orthopedic Procedures: From 2000 to 2022.

Objective We aimed to evaluate trends in government monetary reimbursement (Medicare) for 10 of the most commonly performed pediatric orthopedic procedures from 2000 to 2020. Methods Utilizing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website, we collected data for 10 of the most commonly performed pediatric orthopedic surgical procedures and their variations. The reimbursement data for each procedure was taken from the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, which was collected from the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Baltimore County, MD). The reimbursement values were adjusted for inflation to the 2022 US dollar (USD) using the changes to the Consumer Price Index. The compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) and total percentage changes in reimbursement were calculated for all the procedures and put into relative value units. Results Reimbursement for 20 of the 22 total procedures decreased by 32.65% from 2000 to 2022 after adjusting for inflation. Achilles tenotomy with local anesthesia saw the greatest decrease (-54.38%), whereas the procedure revision of spinal fusion saw the highest increase (26.00%) in mean adjusted reimbursement during this study period. Adjusted reimbursement decreased by an average of 2.08% on a yearly basis. Conclusion This study is the first to take an in-depth view and evaluate trends in procedural Medicare reimbursement for pediatric orthopedic surgery. When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for 20 of 22 included procedures has steadily decreased from 2000 to 2022. There needs to be an increased awareness and consideration of these trends as they will be important for policymakers, hospitals, and surgeons to ensure continued access to meaningful surgical pediatric orthopedic care in the United States.

Arthroscopy Patients in Medicare Population Became Sicker While Reimbursement Decreased From 2013 to 2020

To assess surgeon reimbursement for common arthroscopic procedures, including arthroscopic meniscal debridement and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, in patients with differing risk profiles within the Medicare population. A publicly available Medicare database was used to identify all cases of arthroscopic meniscal debridement and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures billed to Medicare from 2013 to 2020. The surgeon reimbursement from Medicare was collected and adjusted for inflation. All procedure episodes were split into 2 cohorts; those with a hierarchical condition category (HCC) risk score ≥1.5, and those with patient HCC risk scores <1.5. Reimbursement rates were compared between groups. From 2013 to 2020, a total of 624,077 meniscal debridement procedures and 567,794 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were billed to Medicare Part B. During this time, the mean adjusted surgeon reimbursement for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair decreased by 9.2% from 2013 to 2020. During the same time period, the adjusted mean surgeon reimbursement for arthroscopic both compartment meniscal debridement and single compartment meniscal debridement decreased by 7.9% and 9.9%, respectively. Throughout the study period, the mean HCC risk score increased from 1.19 in 2013 to 1.31 in 2020 (P < .001). Across all years in the study, the sicker cohort had a significantly greater rate of all comorbidities and a greater mean body mass index (P < .001 for all variables). The mean reimbursement across this cohort was lower for both rotator cuff repair (P= .037) and meniscal debridement procedures (P < .001) compared with the healthier cohort. This study demonstrates that from 2013 to 2020, inflation-adjusted surgeon reimbursement for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and meniscal debridement decreased while patient complexity increased. Further, mean surgeon reimbursement was lower among patients with more complexity in comparison with their healthier counterparts for such procedures. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Trends of medicare reimbursement for breast cancer and reconstructive surgery

This study evaluated trends in Medicare reimbursement for commonly performed breast oncologic and reconstructive procedures. Average national relative value units (RVUs) for physician-based work, facilities, and malpractice were collected along with the corresponding conversion factors for each year. From 2010 to 2021, there was an overall average decrease of 15% in Medicare reimbursement for both breast oncology (-11%) and reconstructive procedures (-16%). Based on these findings, breast and reconstructive surgeons should advocate for reimbursement that better reflects the costs of their practice.

Projections of Single-level and Multilevel Spinal Instrumentation Procedure Volume and Associated Costs for Medicare Patients to 2050.

Instrumented spinal fusions can be used in the treatment of vertebral fractures, spinal instability, and scoliosis or kyphosis. Construct-level selection has notable implications on postoperative recovery, alignment, and mobility. This study sought to project future trends in the implementation rates and associated costs of single-level versus multilevel instrumentation procedures in US Medicare patients aged older than 65 years in the United States. Data were acquired from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. Procedure costs and counts were abstracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify spinal level involvement. The Prophet machine learning algorithm was used, using a Bayesian Inference framework, to generate point forecasts for 2020 to 2050 and 95% forecast intervals (FIs). Sensitivity analyses were done by comparing projections from linear, log-linear, Poisson and negative-binomial, and autoregressive integrated moving average models. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the 2019 US Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index. Between 2000 and 2019, the annual spinal instrumentation volume increased by 776% (from 7,342 to 64,350 cases) for single level, by 329% (from 20,319 to 87,253 cases) for two-four levels, by 1049% (from 1,218 to 14,000 cases) for five-seven levels, and by 739% (from 193 to 1,620 cases) for eight-twelve levels (P < 0.0001). The inflation-adjusted reimbursement for single-level instrumentation procedures decreased 45.6% from $1,148.15 to $788.62 between 2000 and 2019, which is markedly lower than for other prevalent orthopaedic procedures: total shoulder arthroplasty (-23.1%), total hip arthroplasty (-39.2%), and total knee arthroplasty (-42.4%). By 2050, the number of single-level spinal instrumentation procedures performed yearly is projected to be 124,061 (95% FI, 87,027 to 142,907), with associated costs of $93,900,672 (95% FI, $80,281,788 to $108,220,932). The number of single-level instrumentation procedures is projected to double by 2050, while the number of two-four level procedures will double by 2040. These projections offer a measurable basis for resource allocation and procedural distribution.