Procedural Learning In Schizophrenia Research Articles

Self-reported sleep disturbances associated with procedural learning impairment in adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis

Sleep disturbance contributes to impaired procedural learning in schizophrenia, yet little is known about this relationship prior to psychosis onset. Adolescents at ultra high-risk (UHR; N=62) for psychosis completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and a procedural learning task (Pursuit Rotor). Increased self-reported problems with sleep latency, efficiency, and quality were associated with impaired procedural learning rate. Further, within-sample comparisons revealed that UHR youth reporting better sleep displayed a steeper learning curve than those with poorer sleep. Sleep disturbances appear to contribute to cognitive/motor deficits in the UHR period and may play a role in psychosis etiology.

Common and distinct neural effects of risperidone and olanzapine during procedural learning in schizophrenia: a randomised longitudinal fMRI study.

RationaleMost cognitive domains show only minimal improvement following typical or atypical antipsychotic treatments in schizophrenia, and some may even worsen. One domain that may worsen is procedural learning, an implicit memory function relying mainly on the integrity of the fronto-striatal system.ObjectivesWe investigated whether switching to atypical antipsychotics would improve procedural learning and task-related neural activation in patients on typical antipsychotics. Furthermore, we explored the differential effects of the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine.MethodsThirty schizophrenia patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during a 5-min procedural (sequence) learning task on two occasions: at baseline and 7–8 weeks later. Of 30 patients, 10 remained on typical antipsychotics, and 20 were switched randomly in equal numbers to receive either olanzapine (10–20 mg) or risperidone (4–8 mg) for 7–8 weeks.ResultsAt baseline, patients (all on typical antipsychotics) showed no procedural learning. At follow-up, patients who remained on typical antipsychotics continued to show a lack of procedural learning, whereas those switched to atypical antipsychotics displayed significant procedural learning (p = 0.001) and increased activation in the superior-middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate and striatum (cluster-corrected p < 0.05). These neural effects were present as a linear increase over five successive 30-s blocks of sequenced trials. A switch to either risperidone or olanzapine resulted in comparable performance but with both overlapping and distinct task-related activations.ConclusionsAtypical antipsychotics restore procedural learning deficits and associated neural activity in schizophrenia. Furthermore, different atypical antipsychotics produce idiosyncratic task-related neural activations, and this specificity may contribute to their differential long-term clinical profiles.

Stable schizophrenia patients learn equally well as age-matched controls and better than elderly controls in two sensorimotor rotary pursuit tasks.

Objective: To compare sensorimotor performance and learning in stable schizophrenia patients, healthy age- and sex-matched controls and elderly controls on two variations of the rotary pursuit: circle pursuit (true motor learning) and figure pursuit (motor and sequence learning).Method: In the circle pursuit, a target circle, rotating with increasing speed along a predictable circular path on the computer screen, must be followed by a cursor controlled by a pen on a writing tablet. In the eight-trial figure pursuit, subjects learn to draw a complex figure by pursuing the target circle that moves along an invisible trajectory between and around several goals. Tasks were administered thrice (day 1, day 2, day 7) to 30 patients with stable schizophrenia (S), 30 healthy age- and sex-matched controls (C), and 30 elderly participants (>65 years; E) and recorded with a digitizing tablet and pressure-sensitive pen. The outcome measure accuracy (% of time that cursor is within the target) was used to assess performance.Results: We observed significant group differences in accuracy, both in circle and figure pursuit tasks (E < S < C, p < 0.01). Strong learning effects were found in each group. Learning curves were similar in circle pursuit but differed between groups in figure pursuit. When corrected for group differences in starting level, the learning gains over the three sessions of schizophrenia patients and age-matched controls were equal and both were larger than those of the elderly controls.Conclusion: Despite the reduced sensorimotor performance that was found in the schizophrenia patients, their sensorimotor learning seems to be preserved. The relevance of this finding for the evaluation of procedural learning in schizophrenia is discussed. The better performance and learning rate of the patients compared to the elderly controls was unexpected and deserves further study.

More than just tapping: Index finger-tapping measures procedural learning in schizophrenia

BackgroundFinger-tapping has been widely studied using behavioral and neuroimaging paradigms. Evidence supports the use of finger-tapping as an endophenotype in schizophrenia, but its relationship with motor procedural learning remains unexplored. To our knowledge, this study presents the first use of index finger-tapping to study procedural learning in individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (SCZ/SZA) as compared to healthy controls. MethodsA computerized index finger-tapping test was administered to 1169 SCZ/SZA patients (62% male, 88% right-handed), and 689 healthy controls (40% male, 93% right-handed). Number of taps per trial and learning slopes across trials for the dominant and non-dominant hands were examined for motor speed and procedural learning, respectively. ResultsBoth healthy controls and SCZ/SZA patients demonstrated procedural learning for their dominant hand but not for their non-dominant hand. In addition, patients showed a greater capacity for procedural learning even though they demonstrated more variability in procedural learning compared to healthy controls. Left-handers of both groups performed better than right-handers and had less variability in mean number of taps between non-dominant and dominant hands. Males also had less variability in mean tap count between dominant and non-dominant hands than females. As expected, patients had a lower mean number of taps than healthy controls, males outperformed females and dominant-hand trials had more mean taps than non-dominant hand trials in both groups. ConclusionsThe index finger-tapping test can measure both motor speed and procedural learning, and motor procedural learning may be intact in SCZ/SZA patients.

Procedural Learning in Schizophrenia: Reconciling the Discrepant Findings

Studies of procedural learning in schizophrenia have been inconsistent, sometimes finding it to be preserved and sometimes impaired. This study examined three factors that could account for the variability among findings: type of task, presence of general intellectual impairment, and the extrapyramidal side effects of neuroleptic treatment. Forty-three patients with schizophrenia and 22 normal control subjects were examined with three different paradigms: the pursuit rotor, mirror reading, and probabilistic learning ("weather prediction"). A subgroup of intellectually preserved patients was also examined. Patients with and without tardive dyskinesia and with and without Parkinsonism were also compared. The schizophrenic patients showed learning comparable to the control subjects on the pursuit rotor and mirror reading but were impaired on the probabilistic learning task. However, this last difference disappeared when the subgroup of intellectually preserved patients was compared with a subgroup of matched control subjects. Patients with and without tardive dyskinesia or Parkinsonism showed similar learning on all three tasks, but patients with tardive dyskinesia showed poorer overall performance than those without. Procedural learning tends to be preserved in schizophrenia, and when impairment is found, differences in the overall level of intellectual function might be the determining factor.

Long-term skill proceduralization in schizophrenia

Previous studies had revealed no specific effect under haloperidol (typical) and risperidone (atypical) neuroleptic (NLP) treatments for schizophrenia (SZ) on a variety of neurocognitive functions relying on the dopaminergic meso-cortico-limbic system (Rémillard et al., 2005, 2008). Considering the different affinities of D2 dopamine receptors for typical and atypical NLPs, these drugs may differentially affect the functions of the striatum, a determinant brain structure involved in procedural learning. The influence of risperidone (2-6 mg) and haloperidol (2-40 mg) on a nonmotor procedural task involving semantically related pairs of words with inverted letters was investigated in this double-blind study. The performance of 26 patients with SZ, randomly assigned to risperidone or haloperidol, was compared to that of 18 healthy controls at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results revealed that all patients with SZ exhibited slower reading speed of the word pairs than healthy controls at all assessment periods. In addition, procedural learning - characterized as a significant decrease in the time taken to read aloud the target word pairs - was more impaired in the haloperidol- than in the risperidone-treated group at all assessment periods. Healthy controls showed steady improvement in reading speed over the 12 months of the study, in contrast to SZ patients, who reached a plateau in their capacity to improve mirror-reading skill over time. However, all SZ participants in the study showed near normal learning profiles from exposure to semantic associations embedded in the procedural memory task, providing evidence for the preservation of associative connections in the semantic network of these patients. The observed impairment in procedural learning in SZ may thus reflect, at least in part, the influence of neuroleptic medication on striatal functions.

Reduced overnight consolidation of procedural learning in chronic medicated schizophrenia is related to specific sleep stages

We previously reported that patients with schizophrenia failed to demonstrate normal sleep-dependent improvement in motor procedural learning. Here, we tested whether this failure was associated with the duration of Stage 2 sleep in the last quartile of the night (S2q4) and with spindle activity during this epoch. Fourteen patients with schizophrenia and 15 demographically matched controls performed a motor sequence task (MST) before and after a night of polysomnographically monitored sleep. Patients showed no significant overnight task improvement and significantly less than controls, who did show significant improvement. While there were no group differences in overall sleep architecture, patients showed significant reductions in fast sigma frequency power (45%) and in spindle density (43%) during S2q4 sleep at the electrode proximal to the motor cortex controlling the hand that performed the MST. Although spindle activity did not correlate with overnight improvement in either group, S2q4 sleep duration in patients significantly correlated with the plateau level of overnight improvement seen at the end of the morning testing session, and slow wave sleep (SWS) duration correlated with the delay in reaching this plateau. SWS and S2q4 sleep each predicted the initial level of overnight improvement in schizophrenia, and their product explained 77% of the variance, suggesting that both sleep stages are necessary for consolidation. These findings replicate our prior observation of reduced sleep-dependent consolidation of motor procedural learning in schizophrenia and link this deficit to specific sleep stages. They provide further evidence that sleep is an important contributor to cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Procedural learning in schizophrenia investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging

A cerebral basis for the acquisition and retention of procedural knowledge in schizophrenia was examined with 1.5 T functional MRI during an embedded sequence Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) in 10 chronic medicated patients and 15 healthy controls. Comparable procedural learning was observed in both groups, suggesting that the impairment reported in previous schizophrenia samples may not be robust. Consistent with previous fMRI reports, procedural learning in the control group was associated with activity in the dorsal striatum, anterior cingulate, parietal cortex and frontal cortex. Greater procedural learning related activity was observed in the control relative to the schizophrenia group in the bilateral frontal, left parietal and bilateral caudate regions. Patients did not activate frontal or parietal areas while responding to the embedded sequence within the SRTT, but greater activation during procedural learning was observed relative to the control sample in the right anterior cingulate, left globus pallidus and the right superior temporal gyrus. Thus, despite comparable instantiation of procedural learning in schizophrenia, the cerebral activation associated with this cognitive skill was abnormal. The paucity of activity in bilateral frontal cortex, left parietal cortex and bilateral caudate nucleus may represent cerebral dysfunction associated with schizophrenia, whereas the hyperactivation of the right superior temporal gyrus, the right anterior cingulate cortex and the left globus pallidus may represent a compensatory cerebral action capable of facilitating near-normal task performance. The results are thus consistent with a neurodevelopmental pathology impinging on fronto-subcortical circuitry.

A failure of sleep-dependent procedural learning in chronic, medicated schizophrenia

Schizophrenia patients have difficulty mastering even rote procedural tasks in rehabilitation settings. Although most studies demonstrate intact procedural learning in schizophrenia, recent findings demonstrate that a critical component of procedural learning is dependent on sleep. This study tested the hypothesis that patients with schizophrenia have a deficit in sleep-dependent procedural learning. Using a simple, well-characterized test of motor skill learning, the finger tapping motor sequence task (MST), 26 patients with chronic, medicated schizophrenia and 14 demographically matched healthy control subjects were tested on two occasions, 24 hours apart. The main outcome measures were learning of the MST on day 1 (practice-dependent learning) and overnight, sleep-dependent improvement in performance. Although schizophrenia patients and control subjects did not differ in practice-dependent learning, patients failed to show overnight improvement (4% deterioration) and differed significantly from control subjects who showed a significant 11% improvement. We present here the first demonstration of a failure of sleep-dependent consolidation of procedural learning in chronic, medicated schizophrenia. This deficit occurred in the context of normal practice-dependent learning within a training session. This behavioral dissociation is consistent with evidence that practice- and sleep-dependent motor learning reflect independent processes and suggests that they are differentially affected in schizophrenia.

Procedural learning in schizophrenia can reflect the pharmacologic properties of the antipsychotic treatments.

Conventional and atypical antipsychotics have different affinities for D2 receptors, and these receptors are principally located in the striatum. Given that this cerebral structure was previously found to play a major role in procedural learning, the antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia may be determinant for the procedural learning profile of these patients. The current study was aimed at verifying whether procedural learning differs in patients with schizophrenia treated with conventional antipsychotics and patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Forty-five patients with schizophrenia were divided into 3 different groups according to their pharmacologic treatment: (1) haloperidol, a classical neuroleptic with high D2 receptor affinity; (2) clozapine, an atypical neuroleptic with practically no D2 receptor affinity; and (3) risperidone, an atypical neuroleptic that nevertheless shows high D2 receptor affinity. Patients were compared to 35 control subjects on a visuomotor procedural learning task (mirror drawing). All patients were able to learn the task. However, those treated with haloperidol showed some degree of learning impairment, while those treated with clozapine or risperidone did not show this impairment. In addition, performance per se, regardless of the learning, was found to be affected in the haloperidol and risperidone, but not in the clozapine groups. Procedural learning in schizophrenia may be differentially affected, depending on the pharmacologic profiles of the antipsychotics used for the treatment of this illness.

Procedural learning in schizophrenia: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation

Procedural learning (PL) is a type of rule-based learning in which performance facilitation occurs with practice on task without the need for conscious awareness. Schizophrenic patients have often (though not invariably) been found to show impaired PL. We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a blocked, periodic sequence-learning task with groups of: (i) healthy subjects, and (ii) schizophrenic patients on conventional antipsychotics. Healthy subjects showed significant PL, but patients did not. In healthy subjects, PL was associated with increased activation in the striatum, thalamus, cerebellum, precuneus, medial frontal lobe, and cingulate gyrus. The power of activation in the thalamus, striatum, precuneus, cingulate gyrus and BA 6 was related to the magnitude of PL in these subjects. No regions, except the anterior inferior gyrus, were significantly activated in patients. The caudate nucleus, thalamus, precuneus, and sensorimotor regions were activated significantly differently between the two groups. The findings demonstrate the involvement of the striatum, cerebellum, thalamus, cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and sensorimotor regions in PL. Further fMRI studies of PL in normal subjects treated with conventional antipsychotics, drug naı̈ve patients, and patients given atypical antipsychotics would help to clarify the roles of schizophrenic disease processes and antipsychotic medication in impaired PL and associated brain abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Improvement of procedural learning in schizophrenia after six months of treatment with clozapine

Improvement of procedural learning in schizophrenia after six months of treatment with clozapine

Procedural Learning in Schizophrenia: Evidence from Serial Reaction Time

Although schizophrenic patients, as a group, show deficits on measures of explicit learning, it is unclear whether they also have deficits on measures of implicit learning. The current study assessed procedural learning in a sample of 48 chronic schizophrenic inpatients and 23 normal controls using the serial reaction time test (SRT). In addition, we examined the clinical correlates of procedural learning. The SRT yields indices of total motor learning and two subcomponents: reaction time learning, and sequence learning. Although patients performed comparably to normal controls on total motor learning, they showed significantly less sequence learning (P <.03) than controls. Reaction time learning did not differ between the two groups. None of the symptom or clinical variables was correlated with the indices of learning. Chronic schizophrenic inpatients showed normal levels of procedural learning on the SRT. However, their learning was qualitatively different than that of controls (i.e. patients showed deficits in sequence learning, but not reaction time learning). Reduced sequence learning could reflect dysfunctional cortico-cerebellar circuits.

Declarative and Procedural Learning in Schizophrenia: A Test of the Integrity of Divergent Memory Systems

A comparison of learning rates between schizophrenia patients and normals on measures tapping different memory systems may provide clues about relatively preserved areas of learning in schizophrenia. The present study assessed declarative (nonsense syllable list learning) and procedural (pursuit rotor tracking) learning in a group of chronic schizophrenia inpatients and a group of normal adults. Approximately equivalent baselines were obtained for the two groups on both measures. The results revealed a significant group trial interaction on the declarative memory measure, exemplified by a shallower learning slope for the patient group. For the procedural learning measure, there was no significant group block interaction; that is, both groups showed similar learning slopes. These findings suggest a relative preservation of selected procedural aspects of learning in schizophrenia.