Probability Of Inpatient Admission Research Articles

Characteristics of patients hospitalized through the emergency department with an oncology drug-related side effect.

6557 Background: Recent advances in oncology treatment present an expanding spectrum of cancer-treatment-related emergencies.Many aspects of healthcare utilization, specifically emergency department (ED) visits, are not well studied in this population. The purpose of this study is to determine (1) what proportion of cancer patients visit the ED with an oncology drug-related side effect and are admitted and (2) what factors impact the probability of inpatient admission among these patients. Methods: This study evaluated ED visits by adult patients undergoing active drug treatment for cancer insured by a large commercial and Medicare health plan in the United States between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. Among cancer-related ED visits, logistic regression was used to determine the marginal effect of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on acute inpatient admission. Results: There were 39,921 total ED visits among patients undergoing drug treatment for cancer; of these, 76% presented with an oncology drug-related side-effect. 36% of all ED visits resulted in admission, 5% resulted in an observation stay. After adjusting, age was not a significant predictor of inpatient admission. Being male (p < 0.01) and living in urban (p < 0.01) or suburban (p < 0.01) zip codes significantly increased the likelihood of admission. Patients with colorectal (p = 0.019), gastrointestinal (p < 0.01), blood (p < 0.01), lung (p < 0.01), metastatic (p < 0.01) cancers, or Hodgkin’s lymphoma (p < 0.01) had significantly increased risk of admission. Patients with prostate (p < 0.01) cancer had a significantly reduced risk of admission. The primary complaint upon presentation to the ED was the most important predictor of inpatient admission; sepsis, pneumonia, medical complications, white cell disorders, metastatic cancer, and fractures were all associated with a significantly higher (all p < 0.001) risk of admission. Patients with comorbid heart failure (p < 0.001), those taking ulcer medications (p < 0.01), or inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.03) had a significantly increased risk of admission. Results were consistent regardless of payer (Medicare or commercial health plan). Conclusions: This study identified cancer patients for whom acute inpatient admission from an ED presentation is more likely. Future studies identifying cancer patients who may be at risk of making an ED presentation based on demographic, clinical and disease-related characteristics are needed and may help inform targeted follow up of patients to mitigate potentially avoidable ED presentation and subsequent inpatient admission.

The Sydney triage to admission risk tool (START) to improve patient flow in an emergency department: a model of care implementation pilot study

BackgroundThe Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) is a validated clinical analytics tool designed to estimate the probability of in-patient admission based on Emergency Department triage characteristics.MethodsThis was a single centre pilot implementation study using a matched case control sample of patients assessed at ED triage. Patients in the intervention group were identified at triage by the START tool as likely requiring in-patient admission and briefly assessed by an ED Consultant. Bed management were notified of these patients and their likely admitting team based on senior early assessment. Matched controls were identified on the same day of presentation if they were admitted to the same in-patient teams as patients in the intervention group and same START score category. Outcomes were ED length of stay and proportion of patients correctly classified as an in-patient admission by the START tool.ResultsOne hundred and thirteen patients were assessed using the START-based model of care. When compared with matched control patients, this intervention model of care was associated with a significant reduction in ED length of stay [301 min (IQR 225–397) versus 423 min (IQR 297–587) p < 0.001] and proportion of patients meeting 4 h length of stay thresholds increased from 24 to 45% (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this small pilot implementation study, the START tool, when used in conjunction with senior early assessment was associated with a reduction in ED length of stay. Further controlled studies are now underway to further examine its utility across other ED settings.

Association of Bronchiolitis Clinical Pathway Adherence With Length of Stay and Costs.

To examine the associations between the level of adherence to bronchiolitis clinical pathway recommendations, health care use, and costs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 267 patients ≤24 months old diagnosed with bronchiolitis from 12/2009 to 7/2012. Clinical pathway adherence was assessed by using a standardized scoring system (0-100) for 18 quality measures obtained by medical record review. Level of adherence was categorized into low, middle, and high tertiles. Generalized linear models were used to examine relationships between adherence tertile and (1) length of stay (LOS) and (2) costs. Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between adherence tertile and probability of inpatient admission and 7-day readmissions. Mean adherence scores were: ED, 78.8 (SD, 18.1; n = 264), inpatient, 95.0 (SD, 6.3; n = 216), and combined ED/inpatient, 89.1 (SD, 8.1; n = 213). LOS was significantly shorter for cases in the highest versus the lowest adherence tertile (ED, 90 vs 140 minutes, adjusted difference, -51 [95% confidence interval (CI), -73 to -29; P <.05]; inpatient, 3.1 vs 3.8 days, adjusted difference, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.4 to 0.0; P <.05]). Costs were less for cases in the highest adherence tertile (ED, -$84, [95% CI, -$7 to -$161; P <.05], total, -$1296 [95% CI, -126.43 to -2466.03; P <.05]). ED cases in the highest tertile had a lower odds of admission (odds ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.15-0.97; P < .05]). Readmissions did not differ by tertile. High adherence to bronchiolitis clinical pathway recommendations across care settings was associated with shorter LOS and lower cost.

Towards valid ‘serious non-fatal injury’ indicators for international comparisons based on probability of admission estimates

BackgroundGovernments wish to compare their performance in preventing serious injury. International comparisons based on hospital inpatient records are typically contaminated by variations in health services utilisation. To reduce these effects,...

Patients presenting at the emergency department with acute abdominal pain are less likely to be admitted to inpatient wards at times of access block: a registry study.

BackgroundAlso known as access block, shortage of inpatient beds is a common cause of emergency department (ED) boarding and overcrowding, which are both associated with impaired quality of care. Recent studies have suggested that access block not simply causes boarding in EDs, but may also result in that patients are less likely to be admitted to the hospital from the ED. The present study’s aim was to investigate whether this effect remained for patients with acute abdominal pain, for which different management strategies have emerged. Access block was defined in terms of hospital occupancy and the appropriateness of ED discharges addressed as 72 h revisits to the ED.MethodsAs a registry study of ED administrative data, the study examined a population of patients who presented with acute abdominal pain at the ED of a 420-bed hospital in southern Sweden during 2011–2013. Associations between exposure and outcomes were addressed in contingency tables and by logistic regression models.ResultsCrude analysis revealed a negative association between access block and the probability of inpatient admission (38.6 % admitted at 0–95 % occupancy, 37.8 % at 95–100 % occupancy, and 35.0 % at ≥100 % occupancy) (p < .001). No significant associations between exposure and 72 h revisits emerged. Multivariable models indicated an odds ratio of inpatient admission of 0.992 (95 % CI: 0.986–0.997) per percentage increase in hospital occupancy.ConclusionsStudy findings indicate that patients with acute abdominal pain are less likely to be admitted to the hospital from the ED at times of access block and that other management strategies are employed instead. No association with 72 h revisits was seen, but future studies need to address more granular outcomes in order to clarify the safety aspects of the effect.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0158-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.