Prize-based Contingency Management Research Articles

Telehealth-Based Contingency Management Targeting Stimulant Abstinence: A Case Series From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Contingency management (CM) is the gold standard treatment for stimulant use disorder but typically requires twice- to thrice-weekly in-person treatment visits to objectively verify abstinence and deliver therapeutic incentives. There has been growing interest in telehealth-based delivery of CM to support broad access to this essential intervention--a need that has been emphatically underscored by the COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we present observations from initial efforts to develop and test a protocol for telehealth-based delivery of prize-based CM treatment incentivizing stimulant abstinence. Four participants engaged in hybrid courses of CM, including one or more telehealth-based treatment sessions, involving self-administered oral fluid testing to confirm abstinence. Observations from initial participants informed iterative improvements to telehealth procedures, and a 12-week course of telehealth-based CM was subsequently offered to two additional participants to further evaluate preliminary feasibility and acceptability. In most cases, participants were able to successfully join telehealth treatment sessions, self-administer oral fluid testing, and share oral fluid test results to verify stimulant abstinence. However, further improvements in telehealth-based toxicology testing may be necessary to interpret test results accurately and reliably, especially when colorimetric immunoassay results reflect substance concentrations near the cutoff for point-of-care testing devices. Preliminary findings suggest that telehealth-based CM is sufficiently feasible and acceptable to support future development, in particular through improved methods for remote interpretation and verification of test results. This is especially important in CM, wherein accurate and reliable detection of both early and sustained abstinence is crucial for appropriate delivery of therapeutic incentives.

Psychological Factors of Addition and Interventions for Substance Use Disorder

Substance use disorders appeared earlier in the history of human development with the discovery of alcohol and drugs. As society develops, more and more people exhibit substance abuse and substance addiction. Therefore, substance use disorders are gradually appearing in the limelight. This review begins with an analysis of the pathology and prevalence of substance use disorders, dividing those psychological factors that can lead to substance use disorders into internalizing and social factors. Five specific therapies, including cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, prize-based contingency management approach, cue-exposure therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy, are analyzed and discussed, also categorized as internal promotion and external influence, based on how these therapies affect clients. Finally, for future research and treatment of substance use disorders, this review combines the previous literature and suggests ways to combine two or more therapies in order to achieve the best treatment results.

Electrophysiological predictors and indicators of contingency management treatment response: Rationale and design for the ways of rewarding abstinence project (WRAP)

BackgroundElectrophysiological measures can predict and reflect substance use treatment response. Veterans are disproportionately affected by disorders of addiction; cocaine use disorder (CUD) being particularly problematic due to high relapse rates and the absence of approved pharmacotherapies. Prize-based Contingency Management (PBCM) is an evidence-based behavioral intervention for CUD, involving incentives for cocaine abstinence but treatment response is variable. Measurement-based adaptation of PBCM has promise to improve effectiveness but remains to be usefully developed. MethodsThis trial aims to determine if individuals with distinct neurocognitive profiles differentially benefit from one of two existing versions of PBCM. CUD patients will be randomized into treatment-as-usual or 12-weeks of PBCM using either monetary or tangible prize incentives. Prior to randomization, EEG will be used to assess response to monetary versus tangible reward; EEG and cognitive-behavioral measures of working memory, cognitive control, and episodic future thinking will also be acquired. Substance use and treatment engagement will be monitored throughout the treatment interval and assessments will be repeated at post-treatment. DiscussionResults of this trial may elucidate individual differences contributing to PBCM treatment response and reveal predictors of differential benefits from existing treatment variants. The design also affords the opportunity to evaluate treatment-related changes in neurocognitive functioning over the course of PBCM. Our model posits that PBCM scaffolds future-oriented goal representation and self-control to support abstinence. Individuals with poorer functioning may be less responsive to abstract monetary reward and will therefore achieve better outcomes with respect to abstinence and treatment engagement when tangible incentives are utilized.

A randomized, controlled trial of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy plus prize-based contingency management for cocaine dependence

BackgroundCocaine has become one of the drugs of most concern in Switzerland, being associated with a wide range of medical, psychiatric and social problems. Available treatment options for cocaine dependence are rare. The study sought to compare combined prize-based contingency management (prizeCM) plus cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to CBT alone in cocaine-dependent patients. MethodsSixty cocaine-dependent patients participated in a randomized, controlled trial with two treatment conditions. The participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group (EG; n=29), who received CBT combined with prizeCM, or to the control group (CG; n=31), who received CBT only during 24 weeks. The primary outcome measures were retention, at least 3 consecutive weeks of cocaine abstinence, the maximum number of consecutive weeks of abstinence and proportions of cocaine-free urine samples during the entire 24-week and at 6-month follow-up. ResultsSixty-three percent of the participants completed the study protocol. Participants in both groups significantly reduced cocaine use over time. Overall, no difference in cocaine-free urine screens was found across the two treatment groups, except at weeks 8, 9, 10, 17 and 21 in favor of the EG. ConclusionsThe addition of prizeCM to CBT seems to enhance treatment effects, especially in the early treatment period, supporting results from previous studies. Both the combined intervention and CBT alone, led to significant reductions in cocaine use during treatment and these effects were sustained at 6-month follow-up. These findings underline the importance in implementing CM and CBT interventions as treatment options for cocaine dependence in the European context.

Prize-based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: a meta-analysis.

To review randomized controlled trials to assess efficacy of a prize-based contingency management procedure in reducing substance use (where a drug-free breath or urine sample provides a chance of winning a prize). A meta-analysis was conducted on papers published from January 2000 to February 2013 to determine the effect size of studies comparing prize-based contingency management to a treatment-as-usual control condition (k = 19 studies). Parallel analyses evaluated the efficacy of both short- (k = nine studies) and long-term outcomes (k = six studies) of prize-based contingency management. The average end-of-treatment effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37, 0.54]. This effect size decreased at the short-term (≤3-month) post-intervention follow-up to 0.33 (95% CI = 0.12, 0.54) and at the 6-month follow-up time-point there was no detectable effect [d = -0.09 (95% CI = -0.28, 0.10)]. Adding prize-based contingency management to behavioral support for substance use disorders can increase short-term abstinence, but the effect does not appear to persist to 6 months.

Preliminary efficacy of prize-based contingency management to increase activity levels in healthy adults.

An estimated 30% of Americans meet the criteria for obesity. Effective, low-cost interventions to increase physical activity are needed to prevent and treat obesity. In this study, 11 healthy adults wore Fitbit accelerometers for 3 weeks. During the initial baseline, subjects earned prize draws for wearing the Fitbit. During intervention, percentile schedules were used to calculate individual prize-draw criteria. The final week was a return to baseline. Four subjects increased step counts as a result of the intervention. A bout analysis of interresponse times revealed that subjects increased overall step counts by increasing daily minutes active and within-bout response rates and decreasing pauses between bouts of activity. Strategies to improve effectiveness are suggested, such as modification of reinforcement probability and amount and identification of the function of periods of inactivity.

Prize contingency management for smoking cessation: A randomized trial

BackgroundAdjunctive behavioral smoking cessation treatments have the potential to improve outcomes beyond standard care. The present study had two aims: (1) compare standard care (SC) for smoking (four weeks of brief counseling and monitoring) to SC plus prize-based contingency management (CM), involving the chance to earn prizes on days with demonstrated smoking abstinence (carbon monoxide (CO) ≤6ppm); and (2) compare the relative efficacy of two prize reinforcement schedules—one a traditional CM schedule, and the second an early enhanced CM schedule providing greater reinforcement magnitude in the initial week of treatment but equal overall reinforcement. MethodsParticipants (N=81 nicotine-dependent cigarette smokers) were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. ResultsPrize CM resulted in significant reductions in cigarette smoking relative to SC. These reductions were not apparent at follow-up. We found no meaningful differences between the traditional and enhanced CM conditions. ConclusionsOur findings reveal that prize CM leads to significant reductions in smoking during treatment relative to a control intervention, but the benefits did not extend long-term.

Using prize-based incentives to enhance daily interactive voice response (IVR) compliance: A feasibility study

This study examined the feasibility of a prize-based contingency-management (CM) approach to encourage interactive voice response (IVR) compliance in a cocaine-treatment study and explored the association between IVR call rate and outcome during a cocaine abstinence-induction trial. Subjects called into the IVR system daily to complete a brief interview assessing cocaine use for the past 24hours. One group earned $1 for each call; the other earned one draw per call from a “prize bowl” with a range of awards. Abstinence was rewarded according to a high-value voucher incentive schedule, which was the same for both groups, and confirmed by thrice-weekly urine testing at clinic visits. Odds of calling were 4.7 times greater (95% CI: 1.23, 17.91) in the prize-CM group than in the fixed dollar CM group. In addition, the percentage of IVR calls was significantly associated with abstinence achievement, χ2 (1)=5.147, p<.023. The use of prize-based CM to increase the use of IVR is feasible and deserves examination as an innovation for helping participants engage in treatment.

Effectiveness of prize-based contingency management in a methadone maintenance program in China

BackgroundMethadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been successfully scaled up nationally in China. However, the program faces problems of poor attendance and high rates of continued drug use. We assessed whether a contingency management (CM) intervention implemented by MMT clinic staff could improve treatment attendance and drug abstinence. MethodsEight MMT clinics in Guangdong province were randomly selected and divided into two groups. A total of 126 participants (55 in urban clinics and 71 in rural clinics) received CM during a 12-week trial, 120 participants (83 in urban clinics and 37 in rural clinics) received usual treatment (UT). Participants in the CM group had the opportunity to draw for prizes contingent on attending treatment daily and testing negative for morphine. Clinic- and individual-level outcomes were compared between the intervention and control groups. ResultsThe retention rate and negative urine testing rate were 14.2% (P=0.010) and 10.7% (P<0.001) higher in the CM group compared to the UT group, respectively. Compared with participants who received UT, CM participants missed on average 7.3 fewer (P=0.008) visits and were 1.91 (95% CI: 1.53–2.39) times more likely to submit a negative urine sample. All clinic- and individual- level effects of the intervention were observed at rural clinics, but the difference in retention rate between urban CM and UT clinics was not significant. ConclusionAlthough the frequency of monitoring and value of the incentives in this study was lower than in previous studies, the CM intervention significantly improved attendance and reduced drug use in China.

Efficacy of contingency management in improving retention and compliance to methadone maintenance treatment: a random controlled study.

BackgroundCompliance with methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in China is poor.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of adjunctive contingency management (CM) on the efficacy of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in patients with opioid dependence.HypothesisA 12-week prize-based contingency management (CM) intervention can increase the retention and compliance of heroin abusers to standardized MMT programs in Shanghai.Methods160 heroin-dependent patients from three voluntary MMT clinics in Shanghai were randomly assigned to a treatment as usual group (MMT, n=80) and an intervention group (MMT+CM, n=80). Daily use of methadone was recorded and urine drug tests were conducted weekly during the first 12 weeks and then at week 16, week 20 and week 24.ResultsThe 12-week retention rates for the intervention (MMT+CM) and treatment-as-usual (MMT) groups were both quite high: 87.5% and 86.2%, respectively. The average durations of using methadone in the two groups were equal (70 days versus 71 days, respectively). There was a non-significant increase in the mean longest drug-free period (7.4 weeks versus 6.5 weeks) and in the mean number of negative urine tests (7.9 versus 7.6). Secondary analysis of the 24-week outcomes (12 weeks after termination of the adjunctive CM treatment) also found no significant differences between the groups. Among those who remained in the program the severity of addiction as assessed by the Addiction Severity Index decreased dramatically over the 24 weeks but, again, there were no significant differences in the addiction measures between those in the intervention group and those in the treatment-as-usual group.ConclusionPrize-based CM is not effective in improving the retention and compliance of heroin abusers to MMT in Shanghai. The main reasons for failure to replicate western studies were the unexpectedly high baseline rates of compliance in this sample (86%) and the relatively weak financial incentives provided by the CM program. CM programs are context dependent so a careful preliminary situational analysis is needed to determine their potential effectiveness at a particular site and to identify the types of incentives (prizes) that will effectively encourage behavioral change in the target participants.

Design and methodological considerations of an effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention: An example from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network

Computer-assisted interventions hold the promise of minimizing two problems that are ubiquitous in substance abuse treatment: the lack of ready access to treatment and the challenges to providing empirically-supported treatments. Reviews of research on computer-assisted treatments for mental health and substance abuse report promising findings, but study quality and methodological limitations remain an issue. In addition, relatively few computer-assisted treatments have been tested among illicit substance users. This manuscript describes the methodological considerations of a multi-site effectiveness trial conducted within the National Institute on Drug Abuse's (NIDA's) National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN). The study is evaluating a web-based version of the Community Reinforcement Approach, in addition to prize-based contingency management, among 500 participants enrolled in 10 outpatient substance abuse treatment programs. Several potential effectiveness trial designs were considered and the rationale for the choice of design in this study is described. The study uses a randomized controlled design (with independent treatment arm allocation), intention-to-treat primary outcome analysis, biological markers for the primary outcome of abstinence, long-term follow-up assessments, precise measurement of intervention dose, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Input from community providers during protocol development highlighted potential concerns and helped to address issues of practicality and feasibility. Collaboration between providers and investigators supports the utility of infrastructures that enhance research partnerships to facilitate effectiveness trials and dissemination of promising, technologically innovative treatments. Outcomes from this study will further the empirical knowledge base on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted treatment in clinical treatment settings.

Prize-based contingency management is efficacious in cocaine-abusing patients with and without recent gambling participation

Prize-based contingency management (CM) is efficacious in treating cocaine abuse, and the chance-based procedures of prize CM may be appealing to those who gamble. Using data from three randomized trials, we evaluated whether cocaine-abusing patients who had wagered in the month before treatment ( n = 62) responded more favorably to prize CM than those who had not ( n = 278). Participants were randomized to standard care (SC) or SC plus prize CM. Although prize CM was related to better outcomes overall, recent gambling was not associated with outcomes across or within treatment conditions. Gambling participation before treatment entry was associated with reductions in gambling over time, and this effect was more pronounced among those assigned to CM. These data suggest that prize CM is equally efficacious for substance-abusing patients who do and do not gamble, and they extend prior studies indicating that prize CM does not increase gambling.

Disseminating contingency management to increase attendance in two community substance abuse treatment centers: Lessons learned

Although contingency management (CM) has been shown to be effective in substance use treatments, community adoption has been slow. To increase dissemination of CM into community practice, two community treatment programs collaborated with university faculty investigators to design, implement, and evaluate low-cost, prize-based CM interventions delivered by treatment staff using Petry's (2000) fishbowl technique. A pre–post study design was used to evaluate the impact of CM on outpatient group attendance. All clients attending the targeted outpatient groups at both treatment programs were eligible to participate. Group attendance was significantly positively impacted after intervention implementation. This is one of the first studies demonstrating successful implementation of CM by community treatment program counselors within their existing treatment groups. The discussion focuses on practical lessons learned during the planning and implementation of the interventions.

EFFECT OF REINFORCEMENT PROBABILITY AND PRIZE SIZE ON COCAINE AND HEROIN ABSTINENCE IN PRIZE‐BASED CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT

Although treatment outcome in prize-based contingency management has been shown to depend on reinforcement schedule, the optimal schedule is still unknown. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial (Ghitza et al., 2007) to determine the effects of the probability of winning a prize (low vs. high) and the size of the prize won (small, large, or jumbo) on likelihood of abstinence until the next urine-collection day for heroin and cocaine users (N=116) in methadone maintenance. Higher probability of winning, but not the size of individual prizes, was associated with a greater percentage of cocaine-negative, but not opiate-negative, urines.

Self-report of illicit benzodiazepine use on the Addiction Severity Index predicts treatment outcome

The relationship between pre-treatment illicit benzodiazepine use (days of use in the last 30) assessed on the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and treatment outcome was investigated by retrospective analysis of data from two controlled clinical trials in 361 methadone maintained cocaine/opiate users randomly assigned to 12-week voucher- or prize-based contingency management (CM) or control interventions. Based on screening ASI, participants were identified as non-users (BZD-N; 0 days of use) or users (BZD-U; >0 days of use). Outcome measures were: urine drug screens (thrice weekly); quality of life and self-reported HIV-risk behaviors (every 2 weeks); and current DSM-IV diagnosis of cocaine and heroin dependence (study exit). In the CM group, BZD-U had significantly worse outcomes on in-treatment cocaine use, quality-of-life scores, needle-sharing behaviors, and current heroin dependence diagnoses at study exit compared to BZD-N. In the control group, BZD-U had significantly higher in-treatment cocaine use but did not differ from BZD-N on psychosocial measures. Thus, in a sample of non-dependent BZD users, self-reported illicit BZD use on the ASI, even at low levels, predicted worse outcome on cocaine use and blunted response to CM.

Contingency management reduces injection-related HIV risk behaviors in heroin and cocaine using outpatients

Intravenous drug use is a major vector of HIV transmission. We assessed whether contingency management (CM), in which participants earn reinforcers for drug abstinence, reduces HIV risk behaviors in methadone-maintained opiate- and cocaine-using outpatients. Participants ( n = 116) were randomly assigned to prize-based CM or to receipt of prize draws noncontingently on a schedule yoked to the CM group. Both groups received methadone and individual counseling throughout treatment. The HIV-Risk Taking Behaviour Scale was administered in written questionnaire form at 2-week intervals (HRBS; [Darke, S., Hall, W., Heather, N., Ward, J., & Wodak, A. (1991). The reliability and validity of a scale to measure HIV risk-taking behaviour among intravenous drug users. AIDS, 5, 181–185]). A mediation analysis was conducted to determine whether abstinence from opiates and cocaine mediated the effect of CM on HRBS scores. Changes in HRBS scores over time differed significantly by treatment ( F(9,334) = 2.4, p < 0.05), with HRBS scores decreasing over time in the CM group to a greater extent than in the noncontingent control group. Participants in the CM group had significantly lower rates of simultaneous cocaine/opiate-positive urine specimens than those in the noncontingent control group during CM treatment ( F(1,111) = 6.8, p = 0.01). The relationship between treatment condition and HRBS scores was mediated by abstinence. CM targeted toward cocaine and heroin use produces significant reductions in injection-related drug-taking behaviors associated with heightened risk for getting or transmitting HIV.

Cost‐effectiveness of prize‐based contingency management in methadone maintenance treatment programs

To determine if prize-based contingency management (CM), which has been shown to improve treatment outcomes over usual care (UC) alone, is cost-effective. A cost-effectiveness study of a multi-site clinical trial. Data on the outcome measures came from the original effectiveness trial. Cost data were gathered by clinic survey specifically for this cost-effectiveness analysis. Six methadone maintenance community clinics participating in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Participants were recruited from six methadone maintenance community treatment programs. The study sample consisted of 388 participants: 190 in the UC condition and 198 in the CM condition. Participants were randomized at each site to either the UC or the CM condition based on the presence of stimulants (cocaine, amphetamine or methamphetamine) and opioids in their baseline urine sample. Prize-based contingency management added to usual care. Longest duration of abstinence (LDA), number of stimulant-negative urine samples and costs of treatment. Compared to usual care, the incremental cost of using prize-based CM to lengthen the LDA by 1 week was $141 [95% confidence interval (CI), $105-$193]. The incremental cost to obtain an additional stimulant-negative urine sample was $70 (95% CI, $53-$117). By comparing this study to a companion study, we found that adding prize-based CM to usual care may be more cost-effective in methadone maintenance clinics than in counseling-based drug-free clinics.

What do we get for our money? Cost‐effectiveness of adding contingency management

To assess the relative cost-effectiveness of lower versus higher cost prize-based contingency management (CM) treatments for cocaine abuse. Cost-effectiveness analyses based on resource utilization, unit costs and outcomes from a previous CM efficacy trial. Two community-based treatment centers. Patients (n = 120) enrolled in out-patient treatment for cocaine abuse. Random assignment to one of three 12-week treatment conditions: standard treatment (STD) alone or two variants of STD combined with prize based CM. In CM, drawing for prizes was available to those submitting drug-free urine samples and completing goal-related activities. There were two levels of pay-out (referred to as $80 versus $240) based on the potential value of prizes won. Costs per participant associated with counseling utilization, urine and breathalyzer testing, and operation of the prize-drawing procedure were derived from a survey conducted at 16 clinics that had participated in CM studies. The three measures of effectiveness were: (1) longest duration of consecutive abstinence; (2) percentage completing treatment; and (3) percentage of samples drug-free. The higher magnitude CM produced outcomes at a lower per unit cost than did the lower magnitude prize CM treatment. This was the case for all three outcome measures examined and held across various assumptions in the sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness analyses can inform policy decisions regarding selection of one treatment model over another. Decisions on adoption of new evidence-based treatments would be aided by more information on society's willingness to pay for incremental gains in effectiveness.

Low-cost contingency management in community clinics: Delivering incentives partially in group therapy.

This study examined the feasibility and effectiveness of prize-based contingency management (CM) when incentives for attendance were administered in group therapy and incentives for abstinence were administered in individual meetings. Three community substance abuse treatment programs participated in this two-phase, crossover design study. Outpatients (N = 103) entering treatment who met diagnostic criteria for cocaine, opiate, and alcohol abuse or dependence were recruited. During the standard condition, participants received standard treatment and submitted breath and urine samples that were tested for alcohol, cocaine, and opiates twice weekly during Weeks 1-6 and once weekly during Weeks 7-12. During the CM condition, participants received the same standard treatment and sample and attendance monitoring, plus the opportunity to win prizes for negative samples and treatment attendance. Demographic information and substance abuse history were evaluated at intake, and posttreatment substance use (toxicology results and self-report) was evaluated at Month 6 and Month 9 follow-up interviews. Primary outcomes were weeks retained in treatment and longest duration of sustained abstinence (LDA). LDA was significantly greater in CM-condition participants, but weeks retained did not differ between groups. Rates of substance use were lower in CM participants at Month 9 but not at Month 6. This study suggests that it is feasible to deliver incentives for attendance in group therapy, but that further research is needed to understand the modest effects on attendance. Strengths and limitations of this study are discussed.

Contingency Management for the Treatment of Methamphetamine Use Disorders

Theory and some preliminary evidence suggest that contingency management may be an effective treatment strategy or adjunct to psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorders. An experimentally rigorous investigation on the topic was provided by a large multisite trial conducted under the auspices of the Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors report data on 113 participants who were diagnosed with methamphetamine abuse or dependence. They were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus contingency management. Urine samples were tested for illicit drugs, and breath samples were tested for alcohol. The reinforcers for drug-negative samples were plastic chips, some of which could be exchanged for prizes. The number of plastic chips drawn increased with each week of negative samples but was reset to one after a missed or positive sample. The participants in both groups remained in treatment for equivalent times, but those receiving contingency management in addition to usual treatment submitted significantly more negative samples, and they were abstinent for a longer period of time (5 versus 3 weeks). These results suggest that contingency management has promise as a component in treatment strategies for methamphetamine use disorder.