Prior Null Responders Research Articles

Boceprevir-based triple therapy to rescue HCV genotype 1/HBV dually infected patients refractory to peginterferon plus ribavirin combination therapy in Taiwan.

The role of directly-acting antivirals (DAA)-containing regimens in the treatment of patients dually-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains unclear. The pilot study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of a protease inhibitor, boceprevir, in combination with peginterferon/ribavirin for HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1)/HBV dually-infected patients refractory to prior peginterferon/ribavirin. Twelve peginterferon-experienced patients dually-infected with HCV-1/HBV were assigned to receive boceprevir 800mg, twice a day, plus peginterferon-α 2b 1.5μg/kg/week and ribavirin 800-1400mg/day for 36 or 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HCV sustained virological response (SVR, HCV RNA undetectable 24 weeks after end-of-treatment). Five patients terminated treatment early due to adverse events (one at week 4, one at week 46), virological failures (one non-response and one breakthrough), and patient request (n=1). Eight patients achieved HCV SVR (66.7% in full-analysis set and 72.7% in modified intention-to-treat population). The HCV SVR rate was 71.4% (5/7) in prior relapsers, 60.0% (3/5) in prior null responder; 75% in non-cirrhotic and 50% in cirrhotic patients. All four patients of prior non-cirrhotic relapsers received 36-week regimen and achieved HCV SVR. There was no HBV-related hepatic flare. All patients experienced at least one adverse event. Two had serious adverse events. Boceprevir plus peginterferon/ribavirin is effective in the treatment of HCV-1/HBV dually infected patients' refractory to prior peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy.

Telaprevir combination therapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 4

Background: The sustained virological response (SVR) rate for genotype 4 (G4) HCV-infected patients after pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) treatment is approximately 60%. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PegIFN and RBV in patients infected with G4 HCV who were previously treated with PegIFN/RBV and failed to achieve SVR. Material and Methods: The study included 10 patients: two prior relapsers, two prior partial responders, and six prior null responders to PegIFN/RBV treatment. The patients were given TVR/PegIFN/RBV for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-36 weeks PegIFN/RBV treatment. Rapid virological response (RVR), early virological response (EVR), extended rapid virological response (eRVR), SVR, and side effects of therapy were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.90±12.52 years and seven were female. All of HCV isolates were typed as 4d. Interleukin (IL) 28B genotype was found CT in seven patients and two patients had cirrhosis. Treatment was stopped within four weeks because of the side effects in two patients. Three of the remaining eight patients (37.5%) achived HVR, RVR, and eHVR. SVR was obtained in two of these patients, but one patient relapsed. SVR rates were 25% in all patients. Conclusion: TVR combination therapy had limited antiviral activity in this patient population. Further investigation of TVR combination therapy in patients with HCV G4 infection is warranted.

Safety and efficacy of faldaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α-2b and ribavirin in Japanese patients with genotype-1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A A protease inhibitor faldaprevir plus pegylated interferon α-2b and ribavirin (PegIFNα-2b/RBV) in Japanese patients with HCV genotype-1 infection. Treatment-naïve patients were randomized (1:1) to faldaprevir 120 mg q.d. for 12 or 24 weeks (response-guided therapy [RGT], n = 44), or faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. for 12 weeks (n = 43), each combined with PegIFNα-2b/RBV for 24 or 48 weeks (RGT). Response-guided therapy was based on early treatment success (HCV RNA <25 IU/mL at week 4 and <25 IU/mL undetected at week 8). Treatment-experienced patients received 240 mg q.d. for 24 weeks, plus PegIFNα-2b/RBV RGT (24 or 48 weeks, prior relapsers, n = 29) or PegIFNα-2b/RBV (48 weeks, 5 prior partial responders/breakthroughs, 10 prior null responders). The primary objective was safety; sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) was a secondary end-point. All except one patient experienced drug-related adverse events. Adverse events led to faldaprevir discontinuation in 1 (2%), 13 (20%), and 3 (6.8%) patients on faldaprevir 120 mg, faldaprevir 240 mg 12 weeks, and faldaprevir 240 mg 24 weeks, respectively. The SVR12 rates were: 86% with faldaprevir 120 mg and 74% with faldaprevir 240 mg among treatment-naïve patients; and 86%, 60%, and 40% among prior relapsers, partial responders/breakthroughs, and null responders, respectively. In treatment-naïve Japanese patients, faldaprevir 120 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα-2b/RBV was better tolerated than faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα-2b/RBV, with at least comparable efficacy. In treatment-experienced patients, most prior relapsers achieved SVR12 with 24 weeks of faldaprevir 240 mg q.d. plus PegIFNα-2b/RBV. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01579474.

Daclatasvir plus simeprevir with or without ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection

We evaluated the combination of daclatasvir (pan-genotypic NS5A inhibitor) and simeprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor), with or without ribavirin, in hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected patients. This phase II, open-label study enrolled treatment-naive patients or prior null responders with genotype 1b (n=147) or 1a (n=21) infection. Genotype 1b-infected patients were randomized 1:1 to receive daclatasvir 30mg plus simeprevir 150mg once daily with or without ribavirin; those who completed the initial 12-week treatment were re-randomized 1:1 to stop treatment or continue treatment through to week 24. Genotype 1a-infected patients received daclatasvir plus simeprevir with ribavirin for 24weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12). For genotype 1b, 84.9% (45/53) and 74.5% (38/51) of treatment-naive patients and 69.6% (16/23) and 95.0% (19/20) of prior null responders to peginterferon and ribavirin achieved SVR12 with daclatasvir plus simeprevir alone and with ribavirin, respectively. Treatment duration did not have a well-defined impact on response. For genotype 1a, daclatasvir plus simeprevir with ribavirin provided a 66.7% (8/12) response rate in treatment-naive patients and was not effective in prior null responders. Data suggest that baseline resistance polymorphisms influenced SVR12 rates. Daclatasvir plus simeprevir was well tolerated with or without ribavirin with low incidences of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation. Daclatasvir plus simeprevir, with or without ribavirin, was effective with a 12- or 24-week duration in genotype 1b-infected patients and was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01628692.

Sofosbuvir-Based Treatment Is Safe and Effective in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection and End-Stage Renal Disease

Introduction: Interferon and ribavirin-free regimens to treat chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are not available and represent an area of unmet clinical needs due to the significant and serious side effects associated with both interferon and ribavirin in this population. Some of these patients may develop liver cirrhosis with the requirement for combined liver and kidney transplantation. We report our experience on the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/simeprevir or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir -based therapy in patients on hemodialysis in the setting of ESRD. Methods: Patients with chronic HCV infection on hemodialysis were included in this study. Patients were started on either sofosbuvir/simeprevir or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. Routine clinical and laboratory data were collected on all patients at baseline and during treatment. Results: Eight patients (6 female, 6 with GT1, one with GT4, and one with GT3), mean age 56.8 ± 20 years, mean time on dialysis of 5.5 years, and mean fibrosis stage of 1.625 ± 1.4 (two with cirrhosis) were included in the study. Seven patients were HCV treatment naïve and one was a prior null responder to interferon-based therapy. Four patients were started on sofosbuvir/simeprevir and 4 patients were started on sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for 12 weeks. Therapy was well tolerated overall with pruritus/ headache developing in one patient each. No patient discontinued therapy due to side effects. Baseline hemoglobin was at 10.8 ± 2.4 g/dL with no significant change during treatment (10.9 ± 1.7 g/dL). Similarly, there was no significant change in platelet count or bilirubin levels with sofosbuvir/ simeprevir or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir treatment (198 ± 164 k/uL at baseline and 188 ± 165 on treatment for platelets; 0.3 ± 0.4 mg/dL and 0.25 ± 0.15 for bilirubin). 4 out of 4 patients who completed treatment (100%) achieved SVR 12, 4 patients are still currently on treatment of these 3 achieved undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 of therapy. Conclusion: Full dose sofosbuvir/simeprevir or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir therapy for HCV-infected patients with ESRD was well-tolerated with no discontinuation due to side effects and no significant hematological adverse events.

Effect of native vitamin D3 supplementation on refractory chronic hepatitis C patients in simeprevir with pegylated interferon/ribavirin.

Protease inhibitors with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN)/ribavirin improve a sustained virological response (SVR) rate to approximately 90% in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b patients with IL28B rs8099917 genotype TT, but yield only approximately 50% in those with the unfavorable non-TT. Among such treatment-refractory patients, serum vitamin D levels could influence the SVR rate. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the effect of native vitamin D supplementation in simeprevir with PEG IFN/ribavirin for 1b patients with non-TT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive simeprevir (100mg/day) for 12weeks plus PEG IFN/ribavirin for 24weeks (control group, n = 58), or vitamin D (2000IU/day) for 16weeks including a lead-in phase plus PEG IFN/ribavirin for 24weeks (vitamin D group, n = 57). The primary end-point was sustainably undetectable viremia 24weeks after the end of treatment (SVR). SVR rates were 37.9% in the control group and 70.2% in the vitamin D group. In subgroup analysis, SVR rates of prior null responders were 11.8% and 54.5%, respectively. SVR rates for advanced fibrosis were 28.6% and 65.4%. SVR rates for patients with vitamin D3 deficiency at the baseline were 25.0% in the control group and 66.7% in the vitamin D group. Overall, the SVR rate was significantly higher in patients with high serum 25(OH)D3 levels at the beginning of combination therapy than in those with low serum 25(OH)D3 levels. Native vitamin D3 supplementation improved SVR rates in simeprevir with PEG IFN/ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b patients with refractory factors.

Effect of Peginterferon or Ribavirin Dosing on Efficacy of Therapy With Telaprevir in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C and Advanced Liver Fibrosis

We investigated the safety, efficacy, and impact of ribavirin and peginterferon dose reduction on complete early virologic response and sustained virologic response (SVR) to triple therapy with telaprevir in treatment-experienced patients with advanced liver fibrosis.Treatment was initiated for 211 patients who failed treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, with bridging fibrosis (F3, n = 68) or cirrhosis (F4, n = 143), including 103 (49%) null-responders (NR), 30 (14%) partial responders (PR), and 78 (37%) relapsers (REL). Impaired liver function (ILF) platelets <100,000/mm3 or albumin <35 g/L were present in 40 patients. The distribution of hepatitis C virus subtypes was: 1a, 1b, or 1, with undetermined subtype for 10 (5%), 187 (89%), and 14 (6%) patients, respectively. Treatment was started with peginterferon alpha-2a or alpha-2b, ribavirin, and telaprevir at standard doses.The overall SVR24 rate was 56% and was lower in cirrhotic patients (NR: 35%, PR: 40%, and REL: 63%, respectively) than in patients with bridging fibrosis (NR: 50%, PR: 75%, and REL: 75%, respectively). The lowest probability of SVR24 was in NRs with ILF (26%). The SVR24 rate significantly decreased in NRs receiving <60% vs >60% of the total ribavirin dose (23% vs 44%, respectively) or <80% vs >80% of the total ribavirin dose (33% vs 48%, respectively). A significant SVR24 decrease was noted subsequent to a total peginterferon dose reduction, both when comparing patients who received <60% vs >60% of the total dose (NR: 0% vs 44%; REL: 33% vs 68%) and patients who received <80% vs >80% of the total dose (NR: 17% vs 50%; REL: 46% vs 71%).Serious adverse events were observed in 31 patients (15%). Deaths occurred in 4 patients. All of the deceased subjects were cirrhotic members of the ILF (baseline serum albumin level <35 g/L and/or platelet count <100,000/mm3) group.Ribavirin dose reduction did not affect efficacy in REL but did in NR. Peginterferon dose reduction decreased the SVR24 rate for all groups, particularly in prior NR. ILF increased the risk of fatal complications with a low probability to achieve SVR24. One solution might be to provide wide and early access to novel, efficient, and safe interferon-free combinations to treatment-experienced patients, particularly those with liver cirrhosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir, and Ritonavir in an Open-Label Study of Patients With Genotype 1b Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection With and Without Cirrhosis

Interferon-free treatment options are rapidly evolving for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b (GT1b) infection with cirrhosis and for nonresponders to prior pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy. We performed a phase 2b, open-label trial of thecombination of ombitasvir (a NS5A replication complex inhibitor), paritaprevir, and ritonavir (an NS3/4A protease inhibitor)-an interferon- and ribavirin-free regimen-in difficult-to-treat patients, including prior null responders and patients with cirrhosis. In an international study, 82 patients without cirrhosis (42 treatment-naive and 40 prior null responders) and 99 with cirrhosis (47 treatment-naive and 52treatment-experienced with prior relapse or a null or partial response) with chronic HCV GT1b infection received ombitasvir (25 mg), paritaprevir (150 mg), and ritonavir (100 mg) once daily for 12 weeks (without cirrhosis) or 24 weeks (with cirrhosis). The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). In treatment-naive and null responder patients without cirrhosis, rates of SVR12 were 95.2% and 90.0%, respectively. In treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, rates of SVR12 were 97.9% and 96.2%, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences in rates of SVR12 were observed between patients with or without cirrhosis. Virologic relapse occurred in 3 null responders without cirrhosis and 1with cirrhosis; virologic breakthrough occurred in 1 null responder without cirrhosis. Common adverse events included headache, asthenia, pruritus, and diarrhea. One patient discontinued taking the drugs because of treatment-related adverse events. An interferon- and ribavirin-free regimen of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, achieved high rates of SVR12 in patients with HCV GT1b infection with and without cirrhosis. This regimen was well tolerated and was associated with low rates of treatment discontinuation. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01685203.

Retreatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection with Telaprevir: Preliminary Results in Turkey.

The use of pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) for the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without a sustained virological response (SVR) prior to PegIFN/RBV treatment has resulted in low success rates. To investigate the efficacy and safety of telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PegIFN/RBV in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 and 4 who were previously treated with PegIFN/RBV and failed to achieve SVR. Multi-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study. The study included 111 patients: 80 prior relapsers, 25 prior null responders, and six prior partial responders to PegIFN/RBV treatment. The patients were given TVR/PegIFN/RBV for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week PegIFN/RBV treatment; virological response results were assessed at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Treatment was discontinued in patients with HCV RNA >1000 IU/mL at week 4 or with negative RNA results at week 4 but >1000 IU/mL at week 12. Rapid virological response (RVR), early virological response (EVR), extended rapid virological response (eRVR), and virological response at 24th week of treatment were evaluated. The side effects of combination therapy and the rates of treatment discontinuation were investigated. The mean age of the patients was 56.02±9.96 years and 45.9% were male. Ninety-one percent of the patients were infected with viral genotype 1, 69.6% with the interleukin (IL) 28B genotype CT and 20.2% were cirrhotic. The RVR rate was 86.3% in prior relapsers, 56% in prior null responders, and 50% in prior partial responders (p=0.002). EVR rates in those groups were 91.3%, 56%, and 83.3%, respectively (p<0.001). eRVR rates were 83.8% in prior relapsers, 48% in prior null responders, and 50% in prior partial responders (<0.001). The virological response at the 24th week of treatment was found to be the highest in prior relapsers (88.8%); it was 56% in prior null responders and 66.7% in prior partial responders (p<0.001). Common side effects were fatigue, headache, anorexia, malaise, anemia, pruritus, dry skin, rash, dyspepsia, nausea, pyrexia, stomachache, and anorectal discomfort. All treatments were discontinued due to side effects in 9.9% of patients. High virological response rates were obtained with TVR/PegIFN/RBV treatment. Although side effects were frequently observed, the discontinuation rate of combination therapy was low.

PTU-105 Real world effectiveness, safety and cost per cure in hepatitis C patients treated with protease inibitor based therapy: results from the HCV research UK cohort

Introduction To estimate real world effectiveness, safety and cost per sustained virological response (SVR) of 1stgeneration protease inhibitor (PI)- based therapies for GT1 chronic HCV infection (CHC) in clinical practice in the UK. Method Patients treated with telaprevir (TPV) or boceprevir (BOC) (stratified 2:1), pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PR) with available outcome data were randomly selected from the HCV Research UK database. Healthcare utilisation and adverse events (AEs) requiring intervention were identified from case note review. Cost of drugs, visits, diagnostics, and AE management were estimated from published sources. Causality of treatment regimen in relation to AE was independently assessed by 2 clinicians. Cost per SVR was calculated as total median cost divided by SVR rate. Sensitivity analyses exploring the impact of SVR rate, discontinuations, inclusion of unclassifiable AEs/hospitalisations and PI price on cost per SVR were undertaken. Results 154 patients from 35 UK centres were analysed. Baseline characteristics: median age 50y (IQR 44–56), male 73%, cirrhotic 21%, 52% treatment experienced (TE). Overall SVR was 62.3% (range 25% in cirrhotic prior null responders, to 86.2% in non-cirrhotic prior relapsers). 53/154 (34.4%) patients discontinued therapy prematurely (50.9% physician withdrew, 26.4% patient withdrew, 22.6% failed stopping rules). 36% (55/154) experienced treatment-related AEs requiring intervention, leading to treatment discontinuation in 25.4% (14/55). 8.4% (13/154) patients required hospitalisation for treatment related AEs. Total treatment related costs for cohort were £4,288,802 (PI: 68.3%, PR: 26.3%, AE management and follow-up: 5.4%). Median total cost per cure was £44,852 (range £35,492 TN non-cirrhotic to £107,288 in cirrhotic prior NR). ![Abstract PTU-105 Table 1][1] Abstract PTU-105 Table 1 Conclusion This is the first UK multicentre study estimating outcomes and costs of PI based regimen in clinical practice. There was substantial variation in SVR and cost per SVR among patient subgroups. These cost per SVR estimates are conservative as retreatment costs for patients not achieving SVR are not included. The high discontinuation rate and HCV treatment-related AEs and hospitalisations suggest a substantial additional burden. Disclosure of interest S. Barclay Grant/ Research Support from: Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Consultant for: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Speaker Bureau of: Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Roche, G. Cooke Grant/ Research Support from: Janssen, BMS and Gilead, Consultant for: Janssen, BI, Gilead and Merck, W. Irving Grant/ Research Support from: Pfizer, GSK, Gilead; Educational grants: BI, Gilead, Merck, Consultant for: Merk, Novartis, BMS, Speaker Bureau of: Janssen, E. Holtham: None Declared, M. Bec Conflict with: conducted the statistical analyses funded by Gilead, J. Schwarzbard Conflict with: conducted the statistical analyses funded by Gilead. [1]: pending:yes

Direct costs of first-generation protease inhibitors for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C viral infection.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis C therapy, robust real-world data are needed to understand the costs and benefits of treatment alternatives. The objective of this study was to evaluate the true direct cost of treatment in an unselected sequential population of patients treated at a tertiary care centre for hepatitis C virus genotype 1. A total of 200 consecutive patients were treated with interferon, ribavirin and a first-generation direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) between 2011 and 2013. A total of 41% had cirrhosis, 31% were prior relapsers, and 41% were prior partial or null responders. Costs used were wholesale acquisition cost prices for medications, average hospital costs per day for each diagnosis code based on US inpatient hospital charges. All costs were adjusted to 2013 dollars. Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 97 patients (48.5%). A total of 14% experienced relapse, 19% breakthrough or nonresponse, and 18.5% discontinued secondary to side effects. Twenty per cent of patients had at least one hospitalization attributable to a complication of therapy. Thirty-seven per cent of patients required erythropoietin-stimulating agents, 16% received filgastrim, and 15% needed a red blood cell transfusion. The mean overall cost of treatment was $83,851 per patient. The cost per SVR was $172,889; $266,670 for patients with cirrhosis. The costs per SVR after treatment with first-generation DAAs are dependent on the stage of disease and therapy side effects. These real-world costs significantly exceed those described in prior cost-effectiveness assessments and should be used instead for future studies.

Naturally Occurring Resistance-Associated Variants of Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitors in Poor Responders to Pegylated Interferon-Ribavirin.

The pretherapeutic presence of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated variants (RAVs) has not been shown to be predictive of triple-therapy outcomes in treatment-naive patients. However, they may influence the outcome in patients with less effective pegylated interferon (pegIFN)-ribavirin (RBV) backbones. Using hepatitis C virus (HCV) population sequence analysis, we retrospectively investigated the prevalence of baseline nonstructural 3 (NS3) RAVs in a multicenter cohort of poor IFN-RBV responders (i.e., prior null responders or patients with a viral load decrease of <1 log IU/ml during the pegIFN-RBV lead-in phase). The impact of the presence of these RAVs on the outcome of triple therapy was studied. Among 282 patients, the prevalances (95% confidence intervals) of baseline RAVs ranged from 5.7% (3.3% to 9.0%) to 22.0% (17.3% to 27.3%), depending to the algorithm used. Among mutations conferring a >3-fold shift in 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for telaprevir or boceprevir, T54S was the most frequently detected mutation (3.9%), followed by A156T, R155K (0.7%), V36M, and V55A (0.35%). Mutations were more frequently found in patients infected with genotype 1a (7.5 to 23.6%) than 1b (3.3 to 19.8%) (P = 0.03). No other sociodemographic or viroclinical characteristic was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of RAVs. No obvious effect of baseline RAVs on viral load was observed. In this cohort of poor responders to IFN-RBV, no link was found with a sustained virological response to triple therapy, regardless of the algorithm used for the detection of mutations. Based on a cross-study comparison, baseline RAVs are not more frequent in poor IFN-RBV responders than in treatment-naive patients and, even in these difficult-to-treat patients, this study demonstrates no impact on treatment outcome, arguing against resistance analysis prior to treatment.

Daclatasvir and asunaprevir plus peginterferon alfa and ribavirin in HCV genotype 1 or 4 non-responders

Improved therapies for peginterferon/ribavirin null or partial responders are needed. This study evaluated daclatasvir (NS5A inhibitor) and asunaprevir (NS3 protease inhibitor) plus peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in this patient population. This open-label, phase 3 study (HALLMARK-QUAD; NCT01573351) treated patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (n=354) or 4 (n=44) infection who had a prior null or partial response to peginterferon/ribavirin. Patients received daclatasvir 60 mg once-daily plus asunaprevir 100mg twice-daily, with weekly peginterferon alfa-2a and weight-based ribavirin for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) among genotype 1-infected patients. Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir and peginterferon/ribavirin demonstrated SVR12 rates of 93% (95% CI 90-96) in prior non-responders infected with HCV genotype 1. SVR12 rates among genotype 4-infected patients were 98% (95% CI 93-100); one patient had a missing post-treatment week-12 HCV-RNA measurement, but achieved an SVR at post-treatment week 24, yielding a 100% SVR rate in genotype 4 patients. Prior peginterferon/ribavirin response, sex, age, IL28B genotype, or cirrhosis status did not influence SVR12 rates. Serious adverse events occurred in 6% of patients; 5% discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities included neutropenia (22%), lymphopenia (16%), anemia (6%), thrombocytopenia (4%), and ALT/AST elevations (3% each). Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir and peginterferon/ribavirin demonstrated high rates of SVR12 in genotype 1- or 4-infected prior null or partial responders. The combination was well tolerated and no additional safety and tolerability concerns were observed compared with peginterferon/ribavirin regimens.

Efficacy and safety of simeprevir with PegIFN/ribavirin in naïve or experienced patients infected with chronic HCV genotype 4

Simeprevir (SMV) is a once-daily (QD), oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor approved for treatment of genotype (GT) 1 and GT4 infection. This Phase III, open-label, single-arm study (RESTORE; NCT01567735) evaluated efficacy/safety of SMV with peginterferon-α-2a/ribavirin (PR) in patients with chronic HCV GT4 infection. 107 patients were included. Treatment-naïve (n=35) and prior relapse patients (n=22) received SMV 150mg QD+PR (12 weeks), followed by PR alone (12 or 36 weeks, response-guided [HCV RNA <25IU/ml detectable/undetectable at week 4 and <25IU/ml undetectable at week 12]). Prior non-responders (partial, n=10; null, n=40) received SMV/PR (12 weeks), followed by PR for 36 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12). Median age: 49.0years; 28.0% Black/African; 7.5% IL28B CC; 28.8% METAVIR F4. Overall, 65.4% (70/107) of patients achieved SVR12 (82.9% [29/35] treatment-naïve; 86.4% [19/22] prior relapsers; 60.0% [6/10] prior partial responders; 40.0% [16/40] prior null responders). In treatment-naïve and prior relapser patients fulfilling response-guided criteria for 24 weeks of treatment (88.6% [31/35] and 90.9% [20/22]), SVR12 rates were high: 93.5% [29/31] and 95.0% [19/20], respectively. Overall on-treatment failure and relapse rates were 23.4% (25/107) and 14.6% (12/82), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were mainly grade 1/2; serious AEs were infrequent (4.7%) and considered unrelated to SMV. Efficacy and safety of SMV 150mg QD for 12 weeks with PR in treatment-naïve or -experienced patients with chronic HCV GT4 infection were in line with previous reports for HCV GT1 infection.

Simeprevir: a review of its use in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Simeprevir (Olysio™; Galexos™; Sovriad®) is an orally-administered NS3/4A protease inhibitor for use in combined drug regimens against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This article reviews studies relevant to the EU simeprevir label. In proof-of-concept studies, simeprevir had potent antiviral activity against all HCV genotypes, except genotype 3. In trials in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, week-12 sustained virological response (SVR12) rates in treatment-naïve patients and prior relapsers were significantly higher with simeprevir plus peginterferon-α/ribavirin (PR) [79-89 %] than with placebo plus PR (36-62 %). In prior partial/null responders, the SVR12 rate with simeprevir plus PR (54 %) was noninferior to that with telaprevir plus PR (55 %). Simeprevir plus PR was also efficacious in patients with HCV genotype 1/HIV-1 co-infection. In prior null responders without severe liver fibrosis (cohort 1) and treatment-naïve patients with severe liver fibrosis (cohort 2) treated with simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, the SVR12 rate for the two cohorts combined was 92 %. In patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection, the SVR12 rates with simeprevir plus PR were 83, 87 and 40 % in treatment-naïve patients, prior relapsers and prior null responders, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse event, serious adverse event and treatment withdrawal rates with simeprevir plus PR were similar to those with placebo plus PR. Skin rashes with simeprevir were mostly mild or moderate; serious photosensitivity reactions occur, but are rare. Simeprevir is efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients with chronic HCV genotypes 1 and 4 infection. Studies of simeprevir in interferon-free regimens and in other subpopulations with HCV infections will be of interest.

The Combination of Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Is More Effective Than That of Peginterferon, Ribavirin, and Sofosbuvir for Patients With Hepatitis C–Related Child's Class A Cirrhosis

The efficacy and safety of interferon-free regimens for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections require further evaluation and comparison with those of interferon-containing regimens. We compared a regimen of peginterferon, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir with a regimen of simeprevir and sofosbuvir in patients with HCV infection and unfavorable treatment features. We performed a prospective open-label study of 82 patients with chronic HCV genotype 1a infection and Child's grade A cirrhosis enrolled from 2 clinics at a single center in Atlanta, Georgia, from December 2013 through January 2014. Fifty patients (61%) had not responded to treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin (null responders), and 32 (39%) were therapy naive; 39 (48%) were African American. Subjects were assigned randomly to groups given simeprevir (150 mg/day) and sofosbuvir (400 mg/day) (n = 58 in the final analysis) or peginterferon alfa 2b (1.5 mcg/kg/wk), ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day), and sofosbuvir (400 mg/day) (n = 24 in the final analysis). Both regimens were given for 12 weeks. The primary trial end point was the proportion of patients with undetectable HCV-RNA levels 12 weeks after therapy completion (SVR12). A significantly greater percentage of patients (93%) given simeprevir and sofosbuvir achieved an SVR12 than those given the interferon-containing regimen (75%) (P = .02). Patients given the interferon-containing regimen had a significantly higher rate of virologic relapse than patients given simeprevir and sofosbuvir (P = .009), as well as worse self-reported outcomes and more side effects. Quality-of-life scores were higher in patients with SVR12 than those without, regardless of treatment regimen. In a prospective study of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1a infection and cirrhosis (48% African American and 61% prior null responders), a 12-week regimen of simeprevir and sofosbuvir produced a significantly higher rate of SVR12 and was better tolerated, with a lower viral relapse rate, than a 12-week regimen of peginterferon, ribavirin, and sofosbuvir. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT021683615.

Low-density lipoprotein and other predictors of response with telaprevir-based therapy in treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1 patients: REALIZE study.

Predictors of response to treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin are well established. In these post-hoc analyses of the REALIZE study, we sought to identify predictors of response for telaprevir-based triple therapy. Patients from the REALIZE study with baseline data for all predictors evaluated (including baseline disease characteristics and demographics, prior treatment response and baseline laboratory assessments) were included in the post-hoc analyses (n = 465). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate factors predicting treatment outcomes. Sustained viral response (SVR) rates were 86% in prior relapsers, 63% in prior partial responders and 32% in prior null-responders. In the final multivariate analysis, baseline factors predicting SVR were prior response to treatment [Odds ratio (OR) = 2.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.13-3.69], low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (≥2.6 mmol/L) (OR = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.52-2.93), HCV genotype (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.93), and maximum alanine amino transferase and aspartate amino transferase (OR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97). Prior response to peginterferon plus ribavirin treatment and LDL levels are the main independent predictive markers of response with telaprevir-based triple therapy.

Undetectable HCV-RNA at treatment-week 8 results in high-sustained virological response in HCV G1 treatment-experienced patients with advanced liver disease: the International Italian/Spanish Boceprevir/Peginterferon/Ribavirin Name Patients Program.

In many countries, first-generation protease inhibitors (PIs)/peginterferon/ribavirin (P/R) still represent the only treatment option for HCV-infected patients. Subjects with advanced disease and previous failure to P/R urgently need therapy, but they are under-represented in clinical trials. All treatment-experienced F3/4 Metavir patients who received boceprevir (BOC)+P/R in the Italian-Spanish Name Patient Program have been included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLR) was used to identify baseline and on-treatment predictors of SVR and adverse events (AEs). Four hundred and sixteen patients, mean age 57.7 (range 25-78 years), 70% males, 69.5% (289/416) F4, 14% (41/289) Child-Pugh class A6, 24% (70/289) with varices and 42% (173/416) prior null responders to P/R, were analysed. Overall, SVR rate (all 381 patients who received one dose of BOC) was 49%, (58% in F3, 45% in F4, 61% in relapsers, 51% in partial, 38% in null responders, and 72% in subjects with undetectable HCV-RNA at treatment-week (TW)8. Among patients with TW8 HCV-RNA ≥ 1000 IU/L, SVR was 8% (negative predictive value = 92%). Death occurred in 3 (0.8%) patients, while decompensation and infections were observed in 2.9% and 11%, respectively. At MLR, SVR predictors were TW4 HCV-RNA ≥ 1log10 -decline from baseline, undetectable TW8 HCV-RNA, prior relapse, albumin levels ≥3.5 g/dL and platelet counts ≥100 000/μL. Metavir F4, Child-Pugh A6, albumin, platelets, age and female gender were associated with serious and haematological AEs. Among treatment-experienced patients with advanced liver disease eligible for IFN-based therapy, TW8 HCV-RNA characterised the subset with either high or poor likelihood of achieving SVR. Using TW8 HCV-RNA as a futility rule, BOC/P/R appears to have a favourable benefit-risk profile.

A Rare Case of Hepatitis C-Associated Cryoglobulinemic Duodenal Vasculitis

Introduction: Intestinal involvement of cryoglobulinemia is an uncommon manifestation of severe vasculitis. We describe the case of a woman who developed acute renal insufficiency and progressive gastrointestinal symptoms after initiating hepatitis C (HCV) therapy. A 65-year-old, non-cirrhotic woman with HCV, genotype 2 (prior null responder to interferon), with known cryoglobulinemia maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), was started on sofosbuvir and ribavirin. HCV RNA viral load decreased from 5,453,939 IU/mL to <15 IU/mL after 2 weeks and was undetectable after 4 weeks. Soon after initiation, she developed severe anemia managed by ribavirin dose reduction and MMF discontinuation. She subsequently developed 2 weeks of abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea, out of proportion to diffuse abdominal tenderness on examination. Ribavirin was discontinued upon admission, followed by sofosbuvir, yet symptoms persisted. An upper endoscopy revealed diffuse duodenal mucosal sloughing with active oozing and underlying dusky pigmented lesions, suspicious for vasculitis. A recurrence of cryoglobulinemia was suspected, in the setting of low complement levels, elevated rheumatoid factor, and absence of anti-nuclear and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. She developed acute kidney injury with a peak creatinine of 2.77 mg/dL, from a baseline of 1.1 mg/dL. Urine electrolytes, urinalysis with proteinuria, and an unremarkable renal ultrasound suggested an intrinsic cause. A confirmatory renal biopsy revealed membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis consistent with HCV-associated cryoglobulinemia. After receiving high-dose glucocorticoids, the first dose of rituximab, and plasmapheresis, her symptoms rapidly improved, as did renal function. Few studies have identified cases of cryoglobulinemia in the setting of successful HCV treatment; however, symptoms are generally mild and cutaneous. Intestinal vasculitis, a rare manifestation of severe cryoglobulinemia often complicated by perforation, requires prompt immunosuppression and/or plasmapheresis. Premature discontinuation of MMF during HCV treatment was likely the cause. Our case adds to the existing small body of published literature on intestinal cryoglobulinemic vasculitis and highlights the complex, viral mediated, immunologic mechanism and its management.Figure 1

Randomized study of danoprevir/ritonavir-based therapy for HCV genotype 1 patients with prior partial or null responses to peginterferon/ribavirin

Chronic hepatitis C treatment for prior non-responders to peginterferon (PegIFN)/ribavirin remains suboptimal. The MATTERHORN study evaluated regimens containing ritonavir-boosted danoprevir (danoprevir/r) in prior PegIFN alfa/ribavirin non-responders. Prior partial responders (N=152) were randomized to 24 weeks of twice-daily danoprevir/r 100/100mg, mericitabine 1000 mg and ribavirin 1000/1200 mg (IFN-free); danoprevir/r plus PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin (triple); or danoprevir/r, mericitabine and PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin (Quad). Prior null responders (N=229) were randomized to 24 weeks of IFN-free therapy, or quad alone (Quad 24) or quad plus 24-weeks of PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin (Quad 48). The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (HCV RNA <25 IU/ml) 24 weeks after end-of-treatment (SVR24). Due to high relapse rates, genotype (G) 1a patients in IFN-free arms were offered additional PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin. Among prior partial responders, SVR24 rates were 46.2%, 51.0%, and 86.0%, in the IFN-free, Triple and Quad arms, respectively; among prior null responders, SVR24 rates were 45.5%, 80.5%, and 83.8% respectively. Relapse rates were lower and SVR24 rates higher in G1b-infected than G1a-infected patients. SVR24 rates in G1a and G1b patients randomized to Quad were 75.0% and 96.2%, respectively, in the partial Quad arm, and 68.1% and 100%, respectively, in the null Quad 24 arm. Treatment failure was associated with resistance to danoprevir, but not to mericitabine, and was more common in G1a infected patients. Treatment was well-tolerated. Danoprevir/r, mericitabine plus PegIFN alfa-2a/ribavirin was well-tolerated and produced high overall SVR24 rates in prior partial and null responders to PegIFN alfa/ribavirin. In contrast, IFN-free regimens were associated with unacceptably high relapse rates.