Prior Nucleoside Reverse-transcriptase Inhibitor Research Articles

Treatment Switch to Dolutegravir With 2 Nucleoside Reverse-Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTI) in Comparison to Continuation With Protease Inhibitor/Ritonavir Among Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus at Risk for Prior NRTI Resistance: A Cohort Analysis of Real-World Data.

BackgroundSwitching antiretroviral regimens when human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viremia is controlled for a new regimen is challenging when there is the potential for prior nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance. The objective was to study virologic outcomes after switching to dolutegravir compared with remaining on a boosted protease inhibitor (protease inhibitor/ritonavir [PI/r]) regimen in people with HIV (PWH) with prior documented virologic failure and/or exposure to mono/dual NRTIs. MethodsWe used the Quebec HIV Cohort including 10 219 PWH whose data were collected at 4 sites in Montreal, Canada. We included all PWH with documented virologic failure or exposure to mono/dual NRTI therapy who were virologically suppressed on a PI/r-based regimen for at least 6 months on or after January 1, 2014 (n = 532). A marginal structural Cox model analysis was used to estimate the effect of the switch to dolutegravir on virologic outcome compared with remaining on PI/r. The outcome was defined as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) >50 copies/mL or 1 VL >50 copies/mL if it occurred at the last VL available. ResultsAmong 532 eligible participants, 216 (40.6%) had their regimen switched to dolutegravir with 2 NRTIs, whereas 316 (59.4%) remained on the PI/r with 2 NRTIs. The weighted hazard ratio for the effect of dolutegravir switch on virologic failure compared with patients whose regimen remained on PI/r was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.21–1.52). ConclusionsWe did not find evidence of an increased risk for virologic failure after switching to dolutegravir from PI/r among patients with previous virologic failure or prior exposure to mono/dual NRTI.

Switching to Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Virologically Suppressed Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

BackgroundBictegravir (B)/emtricitabine (F)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is guideline-recommended treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We evaluated whether people receiving dolutegravir (DTG) plus F/TAF or F/TDF (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) with viral suppression can switch to B/F/TAF without compromising safety or efficacy, regardless of preexisting nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance.MethodsIn this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, we enrolled adults who were virologically suppressed for ≥6 months before screening (with documented/suspected NRTI resistance) or ≥3 months before screening (with no documented/suspected NRTI resistance) on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to switch to B/F/TAF or DTG + F/TAF once daily for 48 weeks, each with matching placebo. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at week 48 (snapshot algorithm); the prespecified noninferiority margin was 4%.ResultsFive hundred sixty-seven adults were randomized; 565 were treated (284 B/F/TAF, 281 DTG + F/TAF). At week 48, B/F/TAF was noninferior to DTG + F/TAF, as 0.4% (1/284) vs 1.1% (3/281) had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (difference, −0.7% [95.001% confidence interval {CI}, −2.8% to 1.0%]). There were no significant differences in efficacy among participants with suspected or confirmed prior NRTI resistance (n = 138). No participant had treatment-emergent drug resistance. Median weight change from baseline at week 48 was +1.3 kg (B/F/TAF) vs +1.1 kg (DTG + F/TAF) (P = .46). Weight change differed by baseline NRTIs (+2.2 kg [F/TDF] and +0.6 kg [F/TAF], P < .001), with no differences between B/F/TAF and DTG + F/TAF.ConclusionsThe single-tablet regimen B/F/TAF is a safe, effective option for people virologically suppressed on DTG plus either F/TDF or F/TAF, including in individuals with preexisting resistance to NRTIs.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT03110380.

High-Levels of Acquired Drug Resistance in Adult Patients Failing First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in a Rural HIV Treatment Programme in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency and patterns of acquired antiretroviral drug resistance in a rural primary health care programme in South Africa.DesignCross-sectional study nested within HIV treatment programme.MethodsAdult (≥18 years) HIV-infected individuals initially treated with a first-line stavudine- or zidovudine-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen and with evidence of virological failure (one viral load >1000 copies/ml) were enrolled from 17 rural primary health care clinics. Genotypic resistance testing was performed using the in-house SATuRN/Life Technologies system. Sequences were analysed and genotypic susceptibility scores (GSS) for standard second-line regimens were calculated using the Stanford HIVDB 6.0.5 algorithms.ResultsA total of 222 adults were successfully genotyped for HIV drug resistance between December 2010 and March 2012. The most common regimens at time of genotype were stavudine, lamivudine and efavirenz (51%); and stavudine, lamivudine and nevirapine (24%). Median duration of ART was 42 months (interquartile range (IQR) 32–53) and median duration of antiretroviral failure was 27 months (IQR 17–40). One hundred and ninety one (86%) had at least one drug resistance mutation. For 34 individuals (15%), the GSS for the standard second-line regimen was <2, suggesting a significantly compromised regimen. In univariate analysis, individuals with a prior nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) substitution were more likely to have a GSS <2 than those on the same NRTIs throughout (odds ratio (OR) 5.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.60–12.49).ConclusionsThere are high levels of drug resistance in adults with failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy in this rural primary health care programme. Standard second-line regimens could potentially have had reduced efficacy in about one in seven adults involved.

The influence of HLA supertype on thymidine analogue associated with low peripheral fat in HIV

To examine the relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype and body composition changes induced by thymidine analogue nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI) use in HIV-positive individuals. Data collected during the Simplification with Tenofovir-Emtricitabine (TDF-FTC) or Abacavir-Lamivudine (ABC-3TC) (STEAL) study were analysed to examine the potential association of HLA genotypes with changes in body composition in treatment-experienced HIV-positive individuals. Demographic, HIV-related, body composition and HLA genotyping data from the STEAL study were used in this analysis. The mean percentage peripheral fat at study baseline was compared in participants with and without prior NtRTI use. Analyses were also carried out for each HLA supertype strata, for five HLA genes, within the thymidine-exposed group. These comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests. Participants with prior NtRTI use had a significantly lower baseline mean peripheral fat percentage compared to those without NtRTI use (31.9 vs. 34.7%; P = 0.0045). However, participants carrying one or more of the three particular HLA supertype alleles, A01, B08 and DQ2, showed no significant difference in mean peripheral fat percentage at baseline by NtRTI use. Among participants with prior NtRTI exposure, there were significant differences in mean peripheral fat by HLA A01, B08 and DQ2 allele expression compared to those without expression of these alleles (A01: 34.91% vs. no A01: 30.3%; P = 0.0087; B08: 36.2% vs. no B08: 31.1%; P = 0.0317; DQ2: 35.16% vs. no DQ2: 30.06%; P = 0.0081). This analysis suggests that HIV-infected individuals carrying HLA A01, B08 or DQ2 supertype alleles may be resistant to NtRTI-induced peripheral fat loss.

Differential Impact of Thymidine Analogue Mutations on Emtricitabine and Lamivudine Susceptibility

The impact of drug resistance-associated mutations on subsequent antiretroviral therapy is an important consideration in managing treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients. Lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) are structurally related nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) approved for use in HIV-1-infected individuals. To evaluate whether susceptibility differences exist between lamivudine and emtricitabine, the phenotypic impact of common NRTI resistance-associated mutations was compared in HIV-1 from patient samples with paired FTC and 3TC susceptibility results. FTC phenotypic susceptibility was more greatly impacted than 3TC susceptibility in the presence of thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs), as the mean fold-change values were higher for FTC than for 3TC in groups of samples containing TAMs (P < 0.001 for 6 of 7 groups). For samples with K65R, L74I/V, or Q151M mutations, the phenotypic impact was similar, as the mean fold-change was not significantly different between drugs. Although the long-term clinical significance of these differences is unclear, they may suggest differential efficacy in some patients with prior NRTI experience, especially those with HIV harboring TAMs.

Renal Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-1 Treatment-experienced Patients with Adverse Events Related to Prior NRTI Use

Renal Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-1 Treatment-experienced Patients with Adverse Events Related to Prior NRTI Use

Nelfinavir and Non‐Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor‐Based Salvage Regimes in Heavily Hiv Pretreated Patients

To assess the efficacy of nelfinavir mesylate (NFV) in combination with delavirdine mesylate (DLV) or efavirenz (EFV) and other antiretroviral agents following virological failure on other protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens. Multicentre, retrospective chart review. One hundred-one patients who were naive to both NFV and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and who initiated NFV plus DLV or EFV-based salvage regimens were reviewed. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction in HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) levels to unquantifiable levels (less than 50 copies/mL, less than 400 copies/mL, less than 500 copies/mL) on at least one occasion after the initiation of salvage therapy. Baseline correlates of response, including prior duration of HIV infection, prior number of regimens, viral load and CD4 cell counts were also evaluated. Patients had a mean duration of HIV infection of 10 years, a mean duration of prior therapy of four years, a median of four prior nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and a median of two prior PIs. At the time of review the mean duration of salvage therapy was 63.4 weeks. Virological suppression was achieved in 59 (58.4%) patients within a mean of eight weeks and maintained for a mean of 44.9 weeks (the mean follow-up was 78 weeks). Of the non-responders, 16 (38%) achieved a less than 1 log(10) decrease in HIV RNA levels. Although there was no association between baseline correlates, response rate (75.7%) was significantly higher in patients with HIV RNA levels of 50,000 copies/mL or lower and CD4 counts greater than 200 cells/mm(3). NFV/NNRTI-based highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens are an effective therapy in many patients who have experienced virological breakthroughs on at least one prior PI-based regimen.

Comparison of Virologic, Immunologic, and Clinical Response to Five Different Initial Protease Inhibitor-Containing and Nevirapine-Containing Regimens

Context: The effectiveness of different protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors outside the setting of clinical trials has not been well described. Objectives: To compare five different PI- and nevirapine (NVP)-containing regimens on virologic, immunologic, and clinical outcomes and treatment discontinuation. Design and Setting: Observational cohort study based on an HIV clinic in London. Patients: A total of 690 patients who received either saquinavir hard gel (SQV HG) (n = 183), indinavir (IDV) (n = 189), nelfinavir (NFV) (n = 109), ritonavir (RTV) (n = 42), ritonavir with saquinavir hard gel (RTV/SQV HG) (n = 45), or NVP (n = 122) as part of an initial PI- or NVP-containing treatment regimen between November 1994 and December 1998. A total of 351 (51%) patients had prior exposure to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were virologic undetectability, subsequent virologic rebound, CD4 cell count rise, development of AIDS, and treatment discontinuation. All analyses were stratified for year of initiation of the PIor NVP-containing regimen. Results: Overall, 63% of patients attained an undetectable viral load (VL) within 6 months of starting their PI or NVP regimen. The adjusted relative hazard (95% confidence interval [CI]) for an undetectable VL relative to SQV HG was (in rank order): 2.77 (CI: 1.84-4.17) for NFV, 2.54 (CI: 1.81-3.57) for IDV, 2.43 (CI: 1.52-3.87) for RTV, 2.08 (CI: 1.28-3.37) for RTV/SQV HG, and 1.96 (CI: 1.35-2.85) for NVP. Forty-nine percent of patients experienced VL rebound within 12 months of initial attainment of undetectability, but relative to SQV HG, this did not differ significantly across the different PI and NVP regimens. The CD4 cell count response and rate of AIDS events were also similar across the different regimens. No independent predictors of VL undetectability were identified, but prior NRTI exposure was associated with VL rebound, and a lower baseline VL and CD4 cell count were associated with a reduced CD4 count response. The frequency (95% CI) of treatment discontinuation differed across the regimens; at 6 months, it was lowest for NFV (18% [CI: 13%-24%]), IDV (25% [CI: 22%-29%]), and NVP (28% [CI: 22%-34%]) and highest for RTV (41% [CI: 31%-52%]) and SQV HG (52% [CI: 48%-57%]). Conclusions: Although PI- and NVP-containing regimens were similar in their CD4 cell count response and rates of subsequent VL rebound, differences were observed in time to VL undetectability and discontinuation rates relative to SQV HG. SQV HG was consistently inferior to the other PIs and NVP. The use of NFV and IDV was associated with the highest rates of undetectability, and together with NVP, the lowest rates of discontinuation.