Prior Use Of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

The role of traditional NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors on COVID-19 outcomes: a real-world data study

The relation between use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and severity of COVID-19 has been the subject to debate since the outbreak of the pandemic. Despite speculations about the possible harmful or protective effects, the position currently most supported by the scientific community is that there is no association between use of NSAIDs and COVID-19 outcomes. With the aim of contributing to increase the body of evidence on this issue, we conducted a case–control study using real-world data to investigate the association between prior use of NSAIDs, by active ingredient and type (traditional NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors), and important COVID-19-related outcomes, including susceptibility, PCR + patient progression, and hospitalisation. Our findings suggest that, in general, the use of traditional NSAIDs is not associated with any adverse COVID-19 outcome. However, we observed a possible association between diclofenac and a higher risk of PCR + patient progression. Our results also suggest that selective COX-2 inhibitors might be related with a reduction in the risk of PCR + patient progression. These results suggest that, with the possible exception of diclofenac, the use of NSAIDs should not be advised against for relief of symptoms in patients with COVID-19. In addition, they support the importance of continue to investigate the treatment potential of selective COX-2 inhibitors in the management of COVID-19, something that could have significant implications for the treatment of this disease and other viral infections.

Effects of prior antiplatelet and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use on mortality in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for abdominal sepsis

BackgroundThe effects of prior antiplatelet and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use on mortality in critically ill patients remain unclear. We investigated the relationship between antiplatelet and/or NSAID use and mortality in patients who had undergone surgery for sepsis caused by intra-abdominal infection. MethodsWe obtained data from adult patients (aged >18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit after abdominal surgery due to intra-abdominal infection. The patients were categorized into those with and without prior antiplatelet and/or NSAID use. ResultsOverall, 241 patients were enrolled, with 76 in the antiplatelet and/or NSAID use group and 165 in the non-use group. The 60-day survival probabilities for the antiplatelet and/or NSAID use and non-use groups were 85.5% and 73.3%, respectively, and this difference was significant (P = .040). In the multivariate analysis of 28-day mortality, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P < .001), Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (P < .001), and blood transfusion within 5 days postoperatively (P = .034) were significant mortality risk factors. In the multivariate analysis of 60-day mortality, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P = .002), Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (P < .001), and blood transfusion within 5 days postoperatively (P = .006) were also significant mortality risk factors. However, prior drug use (P = .036) was a factor in reducing mortality. ConclusionPatients with a prior history of antiplatelet and/or NSAID use had a higher 60-day survival than those who did not use these drugs. Prior antiplatelet and/or NSAID use was significantly associated with a reduction in 60-day mortality.

Prevalence of NSAID use among people with COVID-19 and the association with COVID-19-related outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

AimRecent reports of potential harmful effects of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) have raised great concern.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and MedRxiv databases to examine the prevalence of NSAID use and associated COVID‐19 risk, outcomes and safety.ResultsTwenty‐five studies with a total of 101 215 COVID‐19 patients were included. Prevalence of NSAID use among COVID‐19 patients was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14‐23%, no. of studies [n] = 22) and NSAID use prior to admission or diagnosis of COVID‐19 was not associated with an increased risk of COVID‐19 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.93, 95% CI 0.82‐1.06, I 2 = 34%, n = 3), hospitalization (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.76‐1.48, I 2 = 81%, n = 5), mechanical ventilation (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.47‐1.06, I 2 = 38%, n = 4) or length of hospital stay. Moreover, prior use of NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of severe COVID‐19 (aOR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.71‐0.89, I 2 = 0%, n = 7) and death (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.52‐0.89, I 2 = 85%, n = 10). Prior NSAID administration might also be associated with an increased risk of stroke (aOR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.04‐5.2, I 2 = 0%, n = 2), but not myocardial infarction (aOR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.25‐8.92, I 2 = 0, n = 2) and composite thrombotic events (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.66‐3.69, I 2 = 52%, n = 2).ConclusionBased on current evidence, NSAID use prior to admission or diagnosis of COVID‐19 was not linked with increased odds or exacerbation of COVID‐19. NSAIDs might provide a survival benefit, although they might potentially increase the risk of stroke. Controlled trials are still required to further assess the clinical benefit and safety (e.g., stroke and acute renal failure) of NSAIDs in treating patients with COVID‐19.

Associations of Prior Chronic Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Glucocorticoids With Cachexia Incidence and Survival.

BackgroundCachexia is an inflammatory and metabolic syndrome of unintentional weight loss through depletion of muscle and adipose tissue. There is limited knowledge of how chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids affect cachexia development. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between prior long-term use of NSAIDs or glucocorticoids with cachexia incidence and post-diagnosis weight loss progression in a retrospective cancer patient cohort.MethodsOf 3,802 lung or gastrointestinal cancer patient records, 3,180 comprised our final cohort. Patient demographic information, tumor qualities, medication histories, and comorbidities were assessed. Cachexia was defined as having developed prior to oncologic treatment. Statistical evaluations included categorical, multivariate logistic regression, and log-rank survival analyses. Development of substantial post-diagnosis weight loss was calculated and interpreted for patients without cachexia at diagnosis.ResultsChronic prior use of any NSAID or glucocorticoid medication was associated with approximate absolute and relative reductions in cachexia incidence at diagnosis of 10 and 25 percent (P<0.0001). In multivariate analyses, NSAID medications demonstrated a 23 percent reduction in cachexia incidence likelihood (OR=0.770; 95% CI=0.594, 0.998; P=0.0481). Patients without cachexia at diagnosis were significantly more likely to develop substantial post-diagnosis weight loss from pre-diagnosis use groups of glucocorticoids (OR= 1.452; 95% CI=1.065, 1.979; P=0.0183) or NSAIDs (OR=1.411; 95% CI=1.082, 1.840; P=0.011).ConclusionsOur findings suggest a protective effect of prior anti-inflammatory medications, primarily NSAIDs, against manifestations of the cachexia phenotype at cancer diagnosis. These observations support further exploration of potential therapeutic benefits from anti-inflammatory medications early in cancer management.

Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and keratinocyte cancers: a large population-based cohort study of skin cancer in Australia.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been postulated as chemopreventive agents for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), but findings from observational studies have been inconsistent, and clinical trial data are scant. To examine the association between aspirin and NSAID (nonaspirin) use and the risk of BCC and SCC in a large cohort specifically designed for skin cancer outcomes. We used data from the QSkin Study, a prospective cohort of 43764 residents of Queensland, Australia (34630 were included in this study and 23581 were used in our primary analyses). We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) between self-reported aspirin and NSAID use 1 year prior to study baseline and the first histologically confirmed BCC or SCC for high-risk (history of skin cancer excisions or more than five actinic lesions treated) and average-to-low-risk participants (no history of skin cancer excision and at most five actinic lesions treated). After a median of 3 years of follow-up, 3421 participants developed BCC and 1470 SCC (2288 BCC and 932 SCC with complete covariate information). Among the high-risk group (1826 BCC and 796 SCC), compared with never use, frequent (at least weekly) NSAID use was associated with reduced risk of BCC (HR 0·84, 95% confidence interval 0·71-0.99) but not SCC. Aspirin use was associated with reduced risk of SCC (HR 0·77, 95% confidence interval 0·64-0·93) only among infrequent (less than weekly) users and was not associated with BCC. We observed no association between NSAID or aspirin use and the risk of BCC or SCC among average-to-low-risk participants. While some weakly inverse associations were observed between prior use of aspirin or NSAIDs and skin cancer, the inconsistent patterns of associations do not provide convincing evidence that these medications reduce subsequent skin cancer risk. Further data on doses, duration and long-term follow-up may help us to comprehend the cumulative dose effect.

Efficacy of duloxetine by prior NSAID use in the treatment of chronic osteoarthritis knee pain: A post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in Japan

BackgroundA previously conducted placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 study of 353 Japanese patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) showed significant improvements for duloxetine vs placebo in pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02248480). Reported here are post hoc subgroup analyses evaluating the efficacy of duloxetine according to the pattern of prior nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. MethodsPatients with knee OA pain received once-daily duloxetine or placebo for 14 weeks. Pain was evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and HRQoL was evaluated using the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Patients were divided into four subgroups based on their prior NSAID use: (i) no prior NSAID use; (ii) low-frequency NSAID use (<14 days/month); (iii) high-frequency transdermal NSAID use (transdermal NSAIDs only; ≥14 days/month for the 3 months before study entry); and (iv) high-frequency other NSAID use (eg, oral NSAIDs only, both oral and transdermal NSAIDs; ≥14 days/month for the 3 months before study entry). ResultsIn each of the four prior NSAID use subgroups, there were greater reductions in BPI average pain severity score for duloxetine vs placebo at all timepoints during the 14-week treatment period; the treatment*prior NSAID use interaction was not statistically significant. In each subgroup, the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in BPI average pain severity score was higher for duloxetine vs placebo. In each subgroup, there were greater reductions in WOMAC total score for duloxetine vs placebo at all timepoints; the treatment*prior NSAID use interaction was not statistically significant. In each subgroup, there were greater reductions at Week 14 in WOMAC pain, stiffness, physical function, and total scores for duloxetine vs placebo. ConclusionsDuloxetine was consistently effective with respect to pain relief and HRQoL in Japanese patients with knee OA pain, regardless of the pattern of prior NSAID use.

Severe infectious mononucleosis in immunocompetent adults

ObjectivesTo determine the risk factors for severe infectious mononucleosis (IM) occurrence in immunocompetent adults. MethodsWe performed a multicenter, retrospective case series including immunocompetent adults presenting with confirmed IM between 2001 and 2011. Severe presentations were compared with uncomplicated presentations using Stata® 9 software. The significance level was set at 5%. ResultsIn univariate analysis, age over 30 years (n=13 or 41.9% vs. n=5 or 12.8%; P=0.006), prior use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (n=7 or 87.5% vs. n=1 or 12.5%; P=0.009), and smoking (n=13 or 68.4% vs. n=6 or 31.6%; P=0.013) were associated with severe IM onset. In multivariate analysis, only age over 30 years (OR=3.55; P=0.05) and prior use of NSAIDs (OR=15; P=0.05) remained associated with severe IM onset, without reaching significance level (P=0.05). ConclusionOur study confirmed that age over 30 years is a risk factor for severe IM onset. Prior use of NSAIDs also seems to be correlated with severe presentations. This new data needs to be confirmed in a prospective study.

AB0865 Factors Which Influence the Effect of Analgesic Therapy

BackgroundEffective of pain relief is an important element of the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most popular class of analgesics. To predict their effect, depending...

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug and Acetaminophen Use and Risk of Adult Myeloid Leukemia

Little is known about the causes of adult leukemia. A few small studies have reported a reduced risk associated with regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). In a population-based case-control study, we evaluated analgesic use among 670 newly diagnosed myeloid leukemia cases [including 420 acute myeloid leukemias (AML) and 186 chronic myeloid leukemias (CML)] and 701 controls aged 20 to 79 years. Prior use of aspirin, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, other NSAIDs, and COX-2 inhibitors was assessed and included frequency, duration, and quantity. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using unconditional logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders. Regular/extra strength aspirin use was inversely associated with myeloid leukemia in women (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37-0.93) but not in men (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.58-1.24). In contrast, acetaminophen use was associated with an increased risk of myeloid leukemia in women only (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.04-2.47). These relationships were stronger with increasing dose and duration. When stratified by leukemia type, aspirin use was inversely associated with AML and CML in women. No significant overall associations were found with ibuprofen or COX-2 inhibitors for either sex; however, a decreased risk was observed with other anti-inflammatory analgesic use for women with AML or CML (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.22-0.99; OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.10-0.92, respectively). Our results provide additional support for the chemopreventive benefits of NSAIDs, at least in women. Because leukemia ranks fifth in person-years of life lost due to malignancy, further investigation is warranted. NSAIDs may reduce, whereas acetaminophen may increase, myeloid leukemia risk in women.

Relation of prescription nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use to cognitive function among community-dwelling elderly

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use to level of cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly persons. METHODS: The prospective cohort study included 2765 nonproxy subjects from the Duke University Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly who were cognitively intact at baseline (1986–1987) and alive at follow-up three year later. Cognitive function was assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (i.e., intact vs. impaired and change in score) and by the individual domains of the Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (i.e., number of errors). NSAID use, determined from in-home interviews, was coded for chronicity, dose, frequency of use, and prescription status. RESULTS: After controlling for demographic factors as well as health status and behavior, continuous, regularly-scheduled, prescription use of NSAID was associated with preservation of one aspect of cognitive functioning: concentration (beta coefficient, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.54 to −0.04, indicating fewer errors). However, no consistent dose-response relationship was found. Current and prior NSAID use was unrelated to level of cognitive functioning across all five measures; among current users, those taking moderate or high doses (beta coefficient, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.74) made more errors on the memory test compared with those taking low doses (beta coefficient 0.03; 95% CI, −.85 to 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest no substantial or consistent protective effect of prescription NSAID use on cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly. However, recent use at higher doses may be associated with memory deterioration in this population.