This study investigated the effects of hydrocolloid addition on three-dimensional (3D) printing and cooking of plant ingredients-based meat analog (MA). The MA inks were formulated with soy protein isolate, wheat gluten, canola oil, water, and hydrocolloids (xanthan gum, pectin, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, guar gum, locust bean gum) at a ratio of 22:12:15:88:2. Formulated inks were used to create a specific 3D cylindrical model geometry and the printed structure were subjected to air frying (AF:180°C, 15 min) and infrared heating (IR:180°C, 15 min). Results showed that the MA ink’s viscosity (3871–5482 Pa. s), 3D printing rate (0.34–0.39 g.sec−1), printing error (2.51–10.37 %), and printing precision (81.97–97.27 %) were significantly (p<0.05) impacted by the incorporation of hydrocolloids. The dimensional stability (63.17–98.58 %), and cooking loss (6.70–17.41 %) were greatly impacted by both the hydrocolloids and post-printing cooking methods. Moisture (1.71 db) and fat (0.28 db) content of uncooked 3D printed MA were identical, whereas, differences in color attributes (L value:80.21–98.88, a value:0.01–0.13, b value:0.11–2.11) among the studied hydrocolloid added samples were observed. Moisture, fat, and color traits of 3D printed meat-analogs were significantly (p<0.05) impacted by post-printing cooking methods (AF, IR). During post-printing cooking, the loss of mass (moisture, fat) and changes in color tones were associated with the types of hydrocolloids incorporated in formulating the 3D printing ink. Surfaces and internal structure, mass loss, chemical profile, and glass-transition-temperature of 3D printed meat-analogs were significantly (p<0.05) impacted by both the type of incorporated hydrocolloids and post-printing cooking methods.
Read full abstract