main distorting factor in the sociological tradition, according to Mingione (1994: 25), been the use of dichotomy between Gemeinschaft/ Gesellschaft as a pure opposition between a model of traditional society and one of the modern social life. This radical opposition has overshadowed the reality of complex innovative adaptation of social arrangements, where both principles of reciprocity and principles of association have continued to coexist. In another context, this dichotomization of social and, I might add, economic arrangements takes place on other levels as well, beyond traditional and modern and even within the modern. The discussion of and reflects this notion of duality in a way that overlooks the complexity of human existence. This article questions the separation of formal and informal economy in the substantial literature on the subject. Examining state policy in relation to the agricultural and industrial sectors in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, I will show how informal and formal processes are intertwined and suggest that they can be separated only for purposes of analysis. I will point to the pressing need to reconceptualize formal and informal as interconnected, fluid tendencies in the relations of the people and the state in the context of capitalist development. Among the main implications of this analysis is that, whether promoted by the state or by capitalist enterprises, capitalist development is hotly contested; multiple forms of production, coexisting and sometimes articulating, have been integral (even necessary) features of capitalist development