Life, in essence, is defined as a chemical process characterized by the ability to self-replicate and metabolize. Abiogenesis (i.e., the origin of life) has been the subject of extensive controversies for centuries. Many scientists subscribe to Charles Darwin’s notion that all organic beings that have ever lived on Earth may be descended from a primordial life form commonly referred to as the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). The age of the Earth is about 4.5 billion years and the earliest life may exist more than 3.5 billion years ago according to fossil evidence. The precursor molecules necessary for life may have come from meteoroids, comets, interstellar dust, or from Earth itself. It has been posited that life on Earth, or LUCA, was an evolutionary outcome of the RNA world, a period of time when the primary living substances comprised of RNA — or something chemically similar. Several observations suggest that RNA could have served genetic, catalytic and regulatory roles before the evolution of DNA and proteins. However, the question that still remains to be answered is whether LUCA’s genetic information was carried within the RNA molecule, or had it already evolved to a higher stage of DNA genome. Carl Woese proposed that LUCA began as an ambiguous progenote, a community of organisms that lived in a pool where they could share genes with each other. He further theorized that it then separated to three lines of descent including bacteria, archaea and eukaryote. Phylogenetic analysis based upon whole genomes revealed that LUCA was common ancestor of bacteria and archaea, with eukaryote diverged from some lineages of Archaea. Recent work using phylogenetic and metabolic reconstruction analysis suggested that LUCA might have been anaerobic, thermophilic, CO2-fixing, H2-dependent with Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, and N2-fixing. Although many efforts have been made by scientists to understand LUCA, it still remains an enigma. Here, in this comment, we will briefly summarize different perspectives concerning the nature of LUCA, and at the same time share our opinions in the discussion about (1) the genetic material, (2) the cellular properties, and (3) the putative metabolic characteristics of the last universal common ancestor.