Primary Prevention Of Cardiovascular Disease Research Articles

8746 Primary Prevention and Early Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease in Polyglandular Autoimmune Syndrome Type 2

Abstract Disclosure: V.N. Flores-Robles: None. Y. Fuentes-Rosa: None. M. Sanchez-Cordero: None. D.A. Lopez: None. M. Carrero-Quinones: None. Introduction: Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type 2 (PAS-2) is an autoimmune syndrome that is known for lymphocytic infiltration causing organ-specific damage. It can include primary adrenal insufficiency (Addison's disease), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), autoimmune thyroid disease-causing Grave’s disease, or hypothyroidism, and can be diagnosed when two out of these three pathologies are present. Carpenter syndrome, a type of PAS-2, is described as the triad of Addison's disease, autoimmune thyroid disease, and T1DM. Its initial manifestation can be associated with non-endocrine and endocrine disorders as in autoimmune thyroid disease, T1DM, primary hypogonadism, and diabetes insipidus. It is well documented that uncontrolled diabetes mellitus can accelerate the progression of cardiovascular disease of co-existing coronary artery disease, but documentation that Addison’s disease may accelerate the progression is scant with only ten cases documented. On the other hand, there are no documented cases of the presence of coronary artery disease in patients with PAS-2. Case report: This case involves a 66-year-old Hispanic male with a past medical history of hypertension, and PAS-2, presenting with Addison’s disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism. The initial presentation at the hospital was that of a complete atrioventricular block that required pacemaker placement. Cardiology services were consulted as the patient also had a positive stress test and eventually cardiac catheterization was done as further workup. Cardiac catheterization showed obstruction of the left main coronary artery of 80% and left circumflex with mild disease, that required coronary artery bypass (CABG). A 2D ECHO was done for further evaluation of cardiac function and findings were pertinent for an ejection fraction of 65-70%, mild concentric hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall, and left ventricular diastolic function with impaired relaxation pattern. The patient underwent the CABG procedure without any complications. He has been followed up outpatient and remains without any symptoms or pertinent presentation. Early intervention in this patient with PAS-2 prevented any further cardiovascular complications. Conclusion: Patients with PAS-2 may have a predisposition to developing coronary artery disease due to concomitant endocrinopathies that independently increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. This promotes further investigation into the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients presenting with PAS-2. Taking into consideration the increased risk and/or progression of cardiovascular disease in these patients, early intervention and evaluation by cardiology services should be suggested as it may decrease their morbidity or mortality. Presentation: 6/2/2024

12369 Clinical Experience With Inclisiran At An Academic Center

Abstract Disclosure: L. Chavez Marin: None. M. Gonzalez: None. M.F. Linton: None. B.G. Carranza Leon: None. Background: Inclisiran, a small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecule designed to inhibit proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), is the only siRNA approved for management of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in both primary (for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia) and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In clinical trials, Inclisiran has been shown to reduce LDL-C by more than 50% in populations at high cardiovascular risk. However, real world data about its tolerability and efficacy is still limited. Methods: We conducted an electronic medical record search to identify subjects who were prescribed Inclisiran at a lipid clinic within Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, USA). Subjects were included if they received at least one dose of Inclisiran and had pre- and post- LDL-C levels. Subjects taking other LDL-C lowering medications like statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and PCSK-9 inhibitors were included. Pre- and post- LDL-C averages were calculated and analyzed with 95% confidence intervals. The reasons for medication discontinuation were also examined. Results: Out of 69 subjects identified, only 19 met criteria for inclusion, while 32 never received a dose due to cost burden and insurance denial. The other 18 subjects were not included due to inadequate lab results at the time of data collection. In subjects who received at least one dose of Inclisiran, average pre-LDL-C was 142 mg/dL [CI: 34.7] while post-LDL-C was 77 mg/dL [CI: 24.0], notable for a 46% decrease in LDL-C levels. These subjects were also receiving another lipid lowering agent, like a statin, or had previously used a monoclonal antibody-PCSK-9 inhibitor. Those without prior use of PCSK-9 inhibitors were also analyzed. Average pre-LDL-C was 109.5 mg/dL [CI: 15.8] while post-LDL-C was 39.8 mg/dL [CI: 17.2], which revealed a 64% decrease in LDL-C levels. The main reason for discontinuation of Inclisiran was insurance denial followed by individual preference. Only one subject discontinued Inclisiran due to experiencing a generalized rash. Conclusions: Inclisiran is an effective and overall well-tolerated medication indicated for the management of elevated LDL cholesterol. Our study revealed that for individuals with above goal LDL-C, despite maximum tolerated therapy with a statin, additional LDL-C lowering benefits can be seen with Inclisiran use. However, insurance approval and cost burden seem to be the main barriers for access. Presentation: 6/3/2024

6550 National Statin Prescription Trends in Patients With Breast Cancer and Diabetes for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Abstract Disclosure: A.B. Yang: None. G. Mhango: None. C. Kong: None. J.J. Lin: None. J.P. Wisnivesky: Consulting Fee; Self; Sanofi, Banook, PPD. Grant Recipient; Self; Sanofi, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Axella, Arnold Consultants. A. Leiter: None. Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in older early-stage breast cancer (BC) survivors. Due to cardiotoxic BC treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation, patients with BC and diabetes (DM) are at increased risk of CVD. In patients with BC and DM, statins decrease CVD mortality. Since 2013, many clinical guidelines broadened statin indications for primary CVD prevention in patients with DM, making >85% of patients eligible. Little is known about statin prescription (Rx) patterns in older BC survivors with DM, a group at high risk of CVD. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that statin Rxs increased over time, but were less likely in BC survivors with more advanced locoregional BC and lower comorbidity burden. Methods: A population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data linked to Medicare claims. We identified women with preexisting DM who were diagnosed with stage 0-III primary BC between 2008-17. We excluded patients with prior CVD who died <1 year after BC diagnosis. Statin Rx (atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin) was defined as ≥1 statin pharmacy claim <1 year after BC diagnosis. Comorbidity burden was assessed with a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We compared patient demographic and clinical characteristics by statin Rx status using the chi-square test. Using a multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, race, CCI, BC stage, and diagnosis year, independent predictors of statin Rx were identified. Results: Of 8,423 BC patients with pre-existing DM, 5,698 (68%) had a statin Rx. Statin Rx increased over time (BC diagnosis year 2008-10: 66%, 2011-13: 66%, 2014-15: 69%, 2016-17: 70%; p=0.01) and differed by age (66-69: 66%, 70-74: 70%, 75-79: 69%, ≥80: 65%; p<0.01) and race (White: 68%, Black: 62%, Latinx: 66%, Other: 72%; p<0.01). Statin Rx did not differ by comorbidity burden (CCI 0: 68%, 1-2: 67%, ≥3: 67%; p=0.87) and declined with higher BC stage (0: 73%, I: 70%, II: 65%, III: 63%; p<0.01). In adjusted analyses, more recent BC diagnosis (2016-17 vs. 2008-10: odds ratio [OR]: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.38), age group (70-74 vs. 66-69: OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09-1.41), race (Black vs. White: OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89) and higher BC stages (II vs. 0: OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-1.00; III vs. 0: OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97) remained predictors of statin Rx. Conclusions: In a nationally representative cohort analysis of older early-stage BC patients, statin Rx increased between 2008-17 and varied by age, race, and BC stage. Elucidating gaps in statin Rx can potentially improve guideline-concordant Rx in a group at high risk for CVD and reduce disparities. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Impact of Guideline-Directed Statin Prescriptions on Cardiovascular Outcomes by Race in a Real-World Primary Prevention Cohort

BackgroundData on real-world statin prescription in large, private health care networks and impacts on primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes across race are scarce. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of statin prescription on ASCVD outcomes within and across race in a large, nongovernmental health care system. MethodsStatin prescription in Black and White patients without ASCVD was evaluated (2013-2019). Guideline-directed statin intensity was defined as at least “moderate” for intermediate and high-risk patients. Statin prescription at index and ASCVD outcomes at follow-up (myocardial infarction/revascularization, stroke, mortality) were assessed via electronic health care records using International Classification of Diseases-9 and 10 codes. Cox regression models, adjusted for CVD risk factors, were used to calculate HRs for association between statin prescription and incident ASCVD events across race. ResultsAmong 270,079 patients, 7.6% (n = 20,477) and 92.4% (n = 249,602) identified as Black and White, respectively. Significantly fewer Black patients were prescribed statin therapy than White patients (13.6% vs 19.0%; P < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 6 years, patients with “no statin” prescription vs guideline-directed statin intensity showed increased ASCVD in Black patients (HR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.05-1.86]), and White patients (HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.21-1.45]; P < 0.05) and all-cause mortality. Intermediate and high-risk Black patients faced a 17% higher risk of mortality compared to White patients. However, the interaction between race and statin prescription was not a significant predictor of incident ASCVD events. ConclusionsStatins remain underprescribed. Although Black patients received proportionally less statin prescription than White patients, this was not associated with higher risk of mortality in Black patients.

Estimating the effect of inclisiran on hypercholesterolemia and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: the NHANES 1999–2018 study

BackgroundHypercholesterolemia has been identified as an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Inclisiran, an innovative small interfering RNA agent, is anticipated to result in a notable reduction of approximately 50% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Given its transformative impact, this study scrutinized the eligibility of the US population for inclisiran treatment and evaluated its potential effects on hypercholesterolemia and the primary prevention of CVD.MethodsThis study applied the eligibility criteria from the ORION 10 and 11 trials to the 1999–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset to estimate the size of the eligible population for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and ASCVD-risk equivalents. Utilizing the reduction in LDL-C levels from ORION 10, this study predicted the impact of inclisiran on LDL-C levels among ASCVD patients. Similarly, leveraging the changes in lipid levels from ORION 11, this study predicted inclisiran’s effect on the 10-year change in CVD risk and preventable CVD events in the ASCVD-risk equivalents population, employing the Framingham CVD Risk Score.ResultsThe study identified 579 ASCVD patients (5 million) and 382 ASCVD-risk equivalents (2.66 million) who met the eligibility criteria from ORION 10 and 11. Among the ASCVD population, 3.5 million (70.2%) would achieve a ≥ 50% reduction in LDL-C levels after treatment. Furthermore, 4.6 million (91.3%) would achieve LDL-C levels < 70 mg/dL, and 3.8 million (75%) would achieve LDL-C levels < 55 mg/dL after treatment. For the ASCVD-risk equivalents population, the estimated 10-year CVD risk would decrease from 25.3 to 17.7%, an absolute reduction of 7.6% and a relative reduction of 30% following inclisiran treatment, potentially preventing 202,353 CVD events over a decade, including 138,084 coronary heart disease cases, 37,351 strokes, and 23,894 congestive heart failure cases.ConclusionsInclisiran has the potential to substantially reduce the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and prevent nearly 200,000 CVD events in eligible US adults.

Assessment of modifiable risk factors and vascular wall stiffness in young people

Objective: to study the characteristics of vascular stiffness in young people, taking into account the presence of the main modifiable risk factors (FR) for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Materials and methods: a survey was conducted of 38 practically healthy young people (18 boys, 20 girls) — university students, whose average age was 19.8±1.45 years. By filling in the modified diagnostic charts, the subjects assessed the presence of the main behavioral CVD disorders. Volumetric sphygmography on the VaSera-1000 device (Fukuda Denschi, Japan) was used to assess the stiffness of the main vessels and blood pressure (BP) levels in the basins of the upper and lower extremities. Results: in the examined individuals, despite their young age and the documented absence of cardio-vascular pathology, all the main cardiovascular diseases were revealed: an increased body mass index (BMI≥25 kg/m2), smoking, psychosocial factors, sedentary lifestyle, unbalanced diet, alcohol consumption, which were present in various combinations. Vascular stiffness indices — the cardio-ankle index and the biological age of the vessels — were within the normal range, while the ankle-shoulder index was reduced in 24% of the students. Conclusion: the results obtained indicate the need for primary prevention of CVD by lifestyle modification, even in young people, since the FR detected in them and the tendency to change vascular stiffness indicators can subsequently act as triggers for the early onset of diseases of the circulatory system

Do clinical decision support tools improve quality of care outcomes in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimTo assess the effectiveness of Clinical Decision Support Tools (CDSTs) in enhancing the quality of care outcomes in primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. MethodsA systematic review was undertaken in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and included searches in Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of CDSTs comprising digital notifications in electronic health systems (EHS/EHR) in various primary healthcare settings, published post-2013, in patients with CVD risks and without established CVD. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. Attainment of clinical targets was analysed using a Restricted Maximum Likelihood random effects meta-analysis. Other relevant outcomes were narratively synthesised due to heterogeneity of studies and outcome metrics. ResultsMeta-analysis revealed CDSTs showed improvement in systolic (Mean Standardised Difference (MSD)=0.39, 95 %CI=-0.31, -1.10) and diastolic blood pressure target achievement (MSD=0.34, 95 %CI=-0.24, -0.92), but had no significant impact on lipid (MSD=0.01; 95 %CI=-0.10, 0.11) or glucose target attainment (MSD=-0.19, 95 %CI=-0.66, 0.28). The CDSTs with active prompts increased statin initiation and improved patients’ adherence to clinical appointments but had minimal effect on other medications and on enhancing adherence to medication. ConclusionCDSTs were found to be effective in improving blood pressure clinical target attainments. However, the presence of multi-layered barriers affecting the uptake, longer-term use and active engagement from both clinicians and patients may hinder the full potential for achieving other quality of care outcomes. Lay SummaryThe study aimed to evaluate how Clinical Decision Support Tools (CDSTs) impact the quality of care for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) management. CDSTs are tools designed to support healthcare professionals in delivering the best possible care to patients by providing timely and relevant information at the point of care (ie. digital notifications in electronic health systems). Although CDST are designed to improve the quality of healthcare outcomes, the current evidence of their effectiveness is inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, to quantify the effectiveness of CDSTs. The eligibility criteria targeted patients with CVD risk factors, but without diagnosed CVD. The meta-analysis found that CDSTs showed improvement in systolic and diastolic blood pressure target achievement but did not significantly impact lipid or glucose target attainment. Specifically, CDSTs showed effectiveness in increasing statin prescribing but not antihypertensives or antidiabetics prescribing. Interventions with CDSTs aimed at increasing screening programmes were effective for patients with kidney diseases and high-risk patients, but not for patients with diabetes or teenage patients with hypertension. Alerts were effective in improving patients' adherence to clinical appointments but not in medication adherence. This study suggests CDSTs are effective in enhancing a limited number of quality of care outcomes in primary CVD prevention, but there is need for future research to explore the mechanisms and context of multiple barriers that may hinder the full potential for cardiovascular health outcomes to be achieved.

Interleukin-receptor antagonist and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

Interleukin-receptor antagonist and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Abstract In this work, we introduce a personalized and age-specific net benefit function, composed of benefits and costs, to recommend optimal timing of risk assessments for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. We extend the 2-stage landmarking model to estimate patient-specific CVD risk profiles, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We apply our model to data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, comprising primary care electronic health records from the UK. We find that people at lower risk could be recommended an optimal risk-assessment interval of 5 years or more. Time-varying risk factors are required to discriminate between more frequent schedules for high-risk people.

Healthy Lifestyle and Cardiac Rehabilitation for Weight Loss.

Considerable current interest is directed at pharmacological agents for producing significant weight loss. However, healthy lifestyle choices can also lead to clinically meaningful weight loss and improvements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. In this review, we summarize the recent research from our PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana (PROPEL) randomized controlled trial and review previous data on the potential benefits of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training (CRET) programs to produce weight loss and improvements in CVD risk factors. Although obesity medications are becoming extremely attractive for secondary and even primary CVD prevention, high-intensity non-pharmacological therapies with healthy lifestyle choices reviewed herein can also lead to substantial health improvements in patients with obesity, including improvements in body weight and other body composition parameters as well as overall CVD risk.

Sex specific analysis of patients with and without reported statin intolerance referred to a specialized outpatient lipid clinic

BackgroundLowering LDL-cholesterol is a fundamental goal for both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Our study aims to analyse potential sex disparities regarding the tolerability and effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with and without reported statin intolerance who are being treated at a lipid-outpatient clinic.MethodsFrom 2017 to 2022, n = 1062 patients (n = 612 men, n = 450 women) at high-risk were referred to our lipid-outpatient clinic because of difficulties in lipid control by primary healthcare providers. The main therapeutic objective was to optimize lipid-lowering therapy according to current treatment guidelines.ResultsPatients presented with high LDL-C baseline levels (4.97 ± 1.81 mmol/l (192 ± 70 mg/dL) in men and 5.46 ± 2.04 mmol/l (211 ± 79 mg/dL) in women). Intolerance towards statins was reported more frequently by women (48.2%) than by men (38.9%, p = 0.004). LDL-C continuously decreased with individual treatment adjustments across follow-up visits. In total, treatment goals (LDL < 1.4 mmol/l (< 55 mg/dl) or < 1.8 mmol/l (< 70 mg/dl)) were accomplished in 75.8% of men and 55.5% of women after the last follow-up visit (p < 0.0001). In men, these data are almost identical in subjects with statin intolerance. In contrast, treatment goals were reached less frequently in women with statin intolerance compared to women tolerant to statin therapy.ConclusionEven if treated in a specialized lipid clinic, women are less likely to reach their target LDL-C than men, particularly when statin intolerant. Nevertheless, many patients with statin intolerance can be successfully treated using oral combination and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy. However, ongoing follow-up care to monitor progress and to adjust treatment plans is necessary to reach this goal.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: a clinical update.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV: a clinical update.

P129 ASSESS THE ACCURACY OF FOUR RISK ASSESSMENT MODELS (RISKFRS, RISKWHO, RISKACC/AHA, AND RISKJBS) IN PREDICTING 10-YEAR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENT RISK IN INDIAN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION PATIENTS

Background: Despite numerous risk assessment models available for estimating the 10-year risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in individuals requiring primary prevention of CV disease, their applicability and accuracy in the Indian population remain inadequately studied. Objective of the study is to Assess and compare the predictive accuracy of four cardiovascular risk assessment models—RiskFRS, RiskWHO, RiskACC/AHA, and RiskJBS—in determining the 10-year cardiovascular event risk among Indian acute MI patients. Methods: In this study, 250 participants (mean age 59.4 ± 10.6 years; 205 males) without prior cardiovascular disease who experienced acute myocardial infarction (MI) were assessed using four established risk assessment models: Framingham Risk Score (RiskFRS), World Health Organization risk prediction charts (RiskWHO), American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association pooled cohort equations (RiskACC/AHA), and the 3rd Joint British Societies’ risk calculator (RiskJBS). These models estimated the participants’ predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular events if assessed before the acute MI. Results: RiskWHO provided the lowest risk estimates, with 86.6% of patients estimated to have less than 20% 10-year risk. Conversely, RiskFRS and RiskACC/AHA yielded higher risk estimates (61.7% and 69.8% with less than 20% risk, respectively; p values &lt;0.001 compared to RiskWHO). However, RiskJBS identified the highest proportion of patients as high-risk (only 44.1% at less than 20% risk, p values &lt; 0.01 compared to all other three risk scores). Conclusions: In Indian patients experiencing acute MI, RiskJBS identifies a larger proportion of patients as ’high-risk’ compared to RiskWHO, RiskFRS, and RiskACC/AHA. However, further validation through large-scale prospective studies is necessary. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring risk assessment models to the unique characteristics of the Indian population and highlight the need for additional research to optimize cardiovascular risk prediction and management strategies in this demographic.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: Clotting and Gender-Affirming Care.

Background A transfeminine patient is a 79-year-old with past medical history significant for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gender dysphoria, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, total left hip replacement, and recent provoked deep venous thromboembolism (DVT). She was seen by a pharmacist in a primary care clinic after her discharge from a skilled nursing facility. The patient was experiencing symptoms of gender dysphoria after discontinuation of her estradiol in setting of her DVT. Assessment Her renal function was calculated to ensure she was on appropriate dosing of her medications. Because her DVT was provoked, providers determined she would require only 3 months of anticoagulation. Her laboratory test results showed a subtherapeutic estradiol level and her estradiol was restarted. Additionally, aspirin was being prescribed for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and was discontinued. Outcome She has significant improvement in her gender dysphoria symptoms with resuming her estradiol and now has a therapeutic estradiol level. She is tolerating her direct oral coagulant well and reports good quality of life. Conclusion When reviewing medications for patients it is important to take several factors into account, including dose, appropriate indication, and patient preference. Pharmacists play a key role, through collaboration with providers, in assessing these medication-specific factors. Estradiol was stopped in this patient because of her DVT, but given her DVT was provoked after a recent surgery, it was unlikely that estradiol was the cause of her clot. Weighing the risks and benefits for any patient is important when determining what medications are appropriate to continue. Additionally, calculating renal function appropriately in a gender-non-conforming patients ensures appropriate and safe dosing.

Statin-associated muscle symptoms: A comprehensive exploration of epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical management strategies.

Statins are the first line of treatment for both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Despite the positive effects of statins on cardiovascular events, not all patients can use them at an optimized dose. The reason for this is the skeletal muscle side effects, termed statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Despite extensive research, the precise pathophysiology of SAMS remains unclear and multiple mechanisms may contribute to this phenomenon. Various therapeutic options are available for the management of SAMS, ranging from rechallenging with the same or a different statin to utilizing non-statin therapeutic alternatives in patients intolerant to statins. However, the lack of consensus on the definition of SAMS, the absence of a definitive diagnostic test, and lack of a universally accepted management algorithm pose a great challenge in dealing with this entity. This review aims to explore the various pathophysiological mechanisms involved in SAMS and understand the difference between self-limited toxic myopathy and immune-mediated myopathy requiring immunomodulatory therapy. The conundrum of statin withdrawal, tapering, and rechallenge in SAMS will also be explored in detail along with the newer non-statin therapies that are available.

Comparison of Various Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Calculators: Is It Time for the Friedewald Equation to Go in India?

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is the main target in the management of dyslipidemia in primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Our study aims to compare the conventional and most popular Friedewald equation, and the more recent Sampson equation (literally unknown in India but more accurate), to the directly estimated LDL-c by the homogenous method. No such comparative study has been done in India. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the lipid profiles of patients whose LDL-c was derived directly by the homogenous method was included. Indirect LDL-c was estimated using the Friedewald and Sampson equations. The accuracy, error, and level of correlation between direct LDL-c and the two equations were assessed for concordance and discordance based on LDL-c categories (≤50, 51-70, 71-100, 101-130, ≥131 mg/dL). Upward discordance is when the calculated LDL-c was at least one category higher and downward discordance is when the calculated LDL-c was at least one category lower than the corresponding direct LDL-c (DLDL-c). Subgroup analyses were also done for triglycerides (TGLs) <150, 151-199, ≥200 mg/dL. TGL >400 were assessed separately. A total of 30,810 samples from four centers were studied. The overall mean DLDL-c was 107.86 mg/dL. The mean estimated LDL-c by Friedewald's equation (FLDL-c) and Sampson's equation (SLDL-c) were 101.37 and 104.37 mg/dL, respectively. There was statistical significance (p-value < 0.0005) in the mean difference when DLDL-c was compared with combined SLDL-c and FLDL-c as per the Games-Howell multiple comparison study, in which the mean difference was greater with the Friedewald equation (6.495) than with the Sampson equation (3.491). The overall concordance between FLDL-c vs DLDL-c and SLDL-c vs DLDL-c was nearly similar (74 vs 77%, respectively). The overall discordance upward was 5% with FLDL-c and 7% with SLDL-c (p-value < 0.0005). The overall discordance downward for FLDL-c and SLDL-c was 22 and 15% (p-value < 0.0005). When subgroup analysis was done for LDL-c ≤ 70, the downward discordance was 41% (FLDL-c) and 32% (SLDL-c), giving a false sense of goal LDL-c being achieved more often with FLDL-c. For LDL-c > 70, the corresponding downward discordance was 16 and 11%, respectively. Starting from TGL ≥ 200 mg/dL, there was consistent underestimation of LDL-c by the Friedewald equation. When TGL was > 400, the mean DLDL-c was 109 mg/dL, while for FLDL-c, it was 82 mg/dL and for SLDL-c, it was 98 mg/dL. Sampson's equation improves the accuracy of the indirectly calculated LDL-c compared to Friedewald's equation. The FLDL-c is estimated falsely low at LDL-c ≤ 70 mg/dL, giving a lower sense of LDL-c goal being achieved, and these patients will be undertreated. By switching to Sampson's equation, 9% in the LDL-c ≤ 70 mg/dL and 5% in the LDL-c > 70 mg/dL can be correctly classified. The shift to Sampson's equation requires a simple formula change and can be easily embraced in India-a small change but in the right direction.

2024 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease --- Part I.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and in Taiwan. It is highly prevalent and has a tremendous impact on global health. Therefore, the Taiwan Society of Cardiology developed these best-evidence preventive guidelines for decision-making in clinical practice involving aspects of primordial prevention including national policies, promotion of health education, primary prevention of clinical risk factors, and management and control of clinical risk factors. These guidelines cover the full spectrum of ASCVD, including chronic coronary syndrome, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, and aortic aneurysm. In order to enhance medical education and health promotion not only for physicians but also for the general public, we propose a slogan (2H2L) for the primary prevention of ASCVD on the basis of the essential role of healthy dietary pattern and lifestyles: "Healthy Diet and Healthy Lifestyles to Help Your Life and Save Your Lives". We also propose an acronym of the modifiable risk factors/enhancers and relevant strategies to facilitate memory: " ABC2D2EFG-I'M2 ACE": Adiposity, Blood pressure, Cholesterol and Cigarette smoking, Diabetes mellitus and Dietary pattern, Exercise, Frailty, Gout/hyperuricemia, Inflammation/infection, Metabolic syndrome and Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, Atmosphere (environment), Chronic kidney disease, and Easy life (sleep well and no stress). Some imaging studies can be risk enhancers. Some risk factors/clinical conditions are deemed to be preventable, and healthy dietary pattern, physical activity, and body weight control remain the cornerstone of the preventive strategy.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement.

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Gender Disparities in Statin Prescriptions in People With HIV With Low/Moderate to High Cardiovascular Risk.

The REPRIEVE trial suggests that primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention could be considered among people with HIV at low CVD risk. We found cisgender women with low/moderate and high CVD risk are less likely to receive statins than cisgender men. Efforts are needed to guarantee equal access to statin-based CVD prevention.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement.

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.