Primary Pharmacokinetic Parameters Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics of Enteral Lormetazepam in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients with COVID-19: An Adjunct Sedative Study.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, sedative prescriptions surged, leading to shortages of midazolam. This study investigates lormetazepam as an adjunct sedative alternative to midazolam for mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. We aimed to determine the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of enterally administered lormetazepam and provide dosing recommendations. Critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation were enrolled in April 2020. Lormetazepam 2 mg every 12 h was administered enterally. Blood samples were collected to quantify lormetazepam and its glucuronide. PK analysis was conducted using a one-compartment model with the Edsim++ KinPop plugin. The primary PK parameters (means ± coefficient of variation [CV] %) for absorption constant (Ka), volume of distribution (Vd/F), and clearance (CL/F) were 6.4 h-1, 207 L/70 kg, and 14.5 L/h/kg0.75, respectively. Vd/F and CL/F median values were 2.64 L/kg and 2.53 mL/kg/min, respectively, with a half-life of 10.7 h. Lormetazepam's median ratio to its glucuronide was 11.5. Trough-guided dosing suggested alternatives of 0.92 mg three times daily, 1.62 mg twice daily, or 5.36 mg once daily. This is the first study to report a validated PK model for enterally administered lormetazepam as a sedative adjunct in critically ill adults on mechanical ventilation for ARDS and COVID-19. The model was internally validated using a bootstrap procedure. Adequate lormetazepam concentrations were achieved at prescribed doses, with no significant alterations in clearance or half-life. This population model may aid in dose optimization and sedation management for future intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Semaglutide for the treatment of obesity: Results of two open randomized pharmacokinetic studies

Introduction. Obesity is a growing public health issue in Russia, increasing the risk of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. Controlling obesity involves lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy. Semaglutide, an effective obesity treatment, stimulates insulin production and reduces appetite. Developing a generic semaglutide preparation will improve its availability in Russia.Aim. To study the comparative pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, safety and tolerability of semaglutide products GP40331 and Wegovy using concentrations of 0.68 and 3.2 mg/ml in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.Materials and methods. Bioequivalence studies, conducted per Good Clinical Practice, were open-label, randomized, and involved healthy male volunteers. Subjects received semaglutide at single doses of 0.25 mg (0.68 mg/ml) and 0.5 mg (3.2 mg/ml) under fasting. Bioequivalence was determined by the 90% CI of the ratios of geometric mean values of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-t, Cmax). Semaglutide concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.Results. The 90% CI values for the ratios of geometric means of the primary PK parameters of semaglutide were 90.22–110.29 and 86.48–108.98% (0.68 mg/ml) and 90.62–115.71 and 92.86–113.51% (3.2 mg/ml). Comparable safety was proven for both concentrations.Conclusion. GP40331 and Wegovy at 0.68 and 3.2 mg/mL are bioequivalent and equally safe.

Study on bioequivalence and influence of obesity-related indicators on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for insulin degludec in healthy subjects

This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between test and reference insulin degludec (IDeg) and the effects of body composition on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of IDeg in Chinese healthy volunteers. In this randomized, open-label, crossover trial, 30 healthy Chinese males were assigned to receive a single subcutaneous dose (0.4 IU/kg) of each formulation under 24-h euglycemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp. Body compositions were analysed prior to administration and blood samples were collected at specific times. The 90% of primary pharmacokinetic parameters and 95% of primary pharmacodynamic parameters confidence intervals for the ratio of the least-squares geometric means were all in the range of 80–125%. As the fat content level increases, Cmax, AUC0−12 and GIR-AUC0−24 decreased whereas AUC24−96 increased sequentially. Therefore, the equivalence was demonstrated between test and reference, and in healthy Chinese volunteers, higher levels of adiposity are associated with slower rates of insulin absorption and distribution and the poorer glucose-lowering effect.

A single-dose, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study of levamlodipine besilate tablets in healthy subjects.

Levamlodipine, the levorotatory form of amlodipine racemate, has a blood pressure-lowering effect that is twice that of the racemate. The study aims to establish a foundation for the clinical application of the test drug by conducting a phase I clinical bioequivalence trial, comparing its bioequivalence and safety with the reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects. Recruiting 26 healthy subjects for separate bioequivalence trials in both fasting and fed conditions. The subjects will orally administer 2.5-mg test drug and 5-mg reference drug. A chiral method was used for bioanalytics and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was employed to quantify the (S)-amlodipine concentrations at various time points after administration. In fasting condition, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ are 100.24%, 103.63%, and 103.24%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) fall within the range of 80-125%, satisfying the established bioequivalence criteria. Similarly, upon oral administration of the drugs in the fed condition, the GMRs for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ are 96.48%, 99.90%, and 99.62%, respectively. The corresponding 90% CIs are within the limits of 80-125%, meeting the predefined bioequivalence standards. Furthermore, both drugs exhibited favorable safety profiles. The results show that the two drugs are bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. The two drugs both had similar PK parameters and good safety.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of a Generic Ticagrelor 90-mg Formulation Versus the Innovator Product in Healthy White Subjects Under Fasting Conditions.

Ticagrelor is a key antiplatelet agent used to prevent thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. This open-label, 2-period, crossover Phase I study assessed the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a generic ticagrelor 90-mg formulation compared to the innovator product under fasting conditions. Twenty-eight healthy White adults participated in the study. Each participant received a single dose of either the test or reference formulation, followed by a 7-day washout period before switching to the alternate formulation. Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Statistical analysis of primary pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, showed bioequivalence with test/reference ratios of 110.9% and 107.1%, respectively, and 90% confidence intervals within the 80%-125% regulatory range. Treatment-emergent adverse events, such as headache, dysphagia, and dizziness, were moderate and transient and resolved promptly, with no significant difference in incidence between the formulations. These results confirm that the generic ticagrelor formulation is bioequivalent to the innovator product, supporting its use as an interchangeable option in clinical practice.

A Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label, Single-Dose and Multiple-Dose Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Profiles of Obicetrapib in Healthy Participants in China.

Obicetrapib is a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor. Previous research has demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic (PK) responses to single doses of obicetrapib between Japanese and White males, but the PK responses have not been established in Chinese individuals. The purpose of this randomized, parallel, open-label trial was to characterize the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD; CETP activity and plasma lipids) responses and safety of single doses (5, 10, or 25 mg; N = 36) and multiple doses (10 mg for 14 days; N = 12) of obicetrapib in healthy Chinese individuals. The maximum concentration and area under the drug concentration-time curve of obicetrapib from 0 h to infinity increased with dose after all single doses of obicetrapib. After 7 consecutive days of dosing, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reached their minimum and maximum changes of 42% reduction and 108% increase, respectively. Primary PK and PD parameters after single- and multiple-dose administration of obicetrapib were similar to those in healthy white participants in previous studies. One participant in the 5 mg dose group experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event of decreased white blood cell and neutrophil counts, which resolved without intervention. In conclusion, these findings support the inclusion of Chinese individuals in the ongoing phase 3 clinical development program of obicetrapib.

Effect of midostaurin on the pharmacokinetics of P-gp, BCRP, and CYP2D6 substrates: assessing potential drug-drug interactions in healthy participants : Brief title: Drug-drug interaction of midostaurin.

Midostaurin, approved for FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia and advanced systemic mastocytosis, is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Midostaurin exhibited potential inhibitory effects on P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion-transporting polyprotein 1B1, and CYP2D6 in in vitro studies. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of midostaurin on P-gp (digoxin), BCRP (rosuvastatin) and CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan) substrates in healthy adults. This was an open-label, single-sequence, phase I clinical study evaluating the effect of single-dose midostaurin (100mg) on the PK of digoxin and rosuvastatin (Arm 1), and dextromethorphan (Arm 2). Participants were followed up for safety 30 days after last dose. In addition, the effect of midostaurin on the PK of dextromethorphan metabolite (dextrorphan) was assessed in participants with functional CYP2D6 genes in Arm 2. The effect of midostaurin on digoxin was minor and resulted in total exposure (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) that were only 20% higher. The effect on rosuvastatin was mild and led to an increase in AUCs of approximately 37-48% and of 100% in Cmax. There was no increase in the primary PK parameters (AUCs and Cmax) of dextromethorphan in the presence of midostaurin. The study treatments were very well tolerated with no occurance of severe adverse events (AEs), AEs of grade ≥ 2, or deaths. Midostaurin showed only a minor inhibitory effect on P-gp, a mild inhibitory effect on BCRP, and no inhibitory effect on CYP2D6. Study treatments were well tolerated in healthy adults.

A double-blind, randomized, two-arm, single-dose, parallel-group study in healthy participants to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of FKS518 proposed biosimilar to denosumab with the originator (LUMIADE-1 study).

e15097 Background: Denosumab is a RANKL inhibitor used in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. FKS518 is a proposed biosimilar to denosumab originator product. Biosimilars offer similar efficacy, quality, safety, and favorable economic impact. Once the analytical and functional similarity of a biosimilar has been shown, a comparative human pharmacokinetics (PK) study is conducted to demonstrate that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the biosimilar and the reference product. The present study assessed the PK equivalence of FKS518 to the originator product and provided data on the similarity of the pharmacodynamic, safety and immunogenicity profiles. Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study in healthy volunteers was performed to compare denosumab biosimilar candidate FKS518 versus the originator product. Subjects received a single subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg injection and were followed up for 40 weeks. Primary endpoints PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-last and AUC0-inf) were natural log transformed and analyzed using analysis of covariance methods; results were then transformed back to the original scale. Safety data were collected throughout the study and analyzed descriptively. Results: 213 male subjects 28-55 years of age, with a baseline BMI between 18.2 and 31.7 kg/m2, were randomized to the originator denosumab (n = 106) or FK518 (n = 107). Results of the primary PK analysis demonstrated bioequivalence between FKS518 and the originator denosumab product since the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric least squares mean (LSM) ratios for the 3 primary PK parameters were completely included within the predefined 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence margin (point estimate [90%CI for the ratio]): Cmax: 104.79% [97.04%,113.15%], AUC0-last: 112.29% [104.17%,121.04%] and AUC0-inf : 112.65% [104.27%,121.70%]. Secondary PK parameters were similar as well between FKS518 and the originator: tmax (median: 217.45 hrs. vs. 216.03 hrs. respectively), t1/2 (median: 235 hrs. vs 337 hrs. respectively). The nature, frequency, severity, or resolution of adverse events were comparable across treatments. For immunogenicity, there was no difference between the 2 treatment groups in ADA and Nab incidence at each timepoint. Conclusions: PK equivalence of FKS518 and denosumab originator product was demonstrated with similar PD, safety and immunogenicity profile for the two products. This study adds to the totality of evidence supporting FKS518 as a proposed biosimilar to denosumab.

Воспроизведенная комбинация модуляторов белка CFTR — ивакафтора и лумакафтора. Этические и фармакокинетические аспекты

The lack of effective and affordable therapies for rare diseases is an important ethical issue. One example is cystic fibrosis (CF), a chronic, progressive disease characterized by an impaired function of all exocrine glands. The combination of ivacaftor and lumacaftor (CFTR potentiator and corrector) should lead to a sufficient level of protein on the cell surface and to an increase in its activity, thereby correcting the impaired function. Development of a generic drug containing ivacaftor and lumacaftor as active pharmaceutical substances will increase the availability of this medication and improve patient survival. To study comparative pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of drugs containing ivacaftor and lumacaftor in healthy volunteers. It was conducted as an open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study involving a single intake of the drug during each period under fed condition in healthy male and female volunteers. The conclusion about bioequivalence was made if 90% confidence interval for primary pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t) fell within the accepted bioequivalence limits of 80–125%. According to the results of the study, it was shown that the values of 90% CI of the geometric mean of the main pharmacokinetic parameters for ivacaftor and lumacaftor fall within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. According to the applied criteria, the drugs are bioequivalent, which makes it possible to recommend the investigational drug to the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for obtaining the registration status.

Relative Bioavailability Study of Midazolam Intramuscularly Administered with the Needle-Free Auto-Injector ZENEO® in Healthy Adults.

Intramuscular (IM) midazolam is indicated for the treatment of status epilepticus. Administration must be efficient to rapidly terminate prolonged seizures and prevent complications. The objective of this study was to compare, in terms of relative bioavailability and bioequivalence, IM midazolam injection by needle-free auto-injector, in different settings, to IM midazolam injection by a conventional syringe and needle. In this open-label, randomized, four-period crossover study, healthy adults received single doses of midazolam (10mg) under fasting conditions. The reference treatment (conventional syringe) was administered once, on bare skin in the thigh. The tested treatment (the needle-free auto-injector ZENEO®) was administered three times: on bare skin in the thigh, on bare skin in the ventrogluteal area, and through clothing in the thigh. Repeated plasma samples were collected to obtain 36-h pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Primary PK parameters were area under the plasma concentration-time curve, from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) and from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax). Forty adults were enrolled and included in the PK analysis set. In all comparisons, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the least-squares geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%, with low intra-individual coefficients of variation (< 20.5% for all parameters in all comparisons). Bioequivalence was also met for Cmax in all comparisons except when comparing the tested treatment through clothing versus the reference treatment, where the 90% CI lower limit was slightly outside the bioequivalence range (78.8%). With all tested treatments Cmax was slightly lower, but early mean plasma concentrations (first 10min post-dosing) were higher when compared to the reference treatment. In general, all treatments were well tolerated, with maximum sedation 0.5-1h post-injection. This study establishes that IM midazolam injection on bare skin in the thigh with the ZENEO® is bioequivalent to IM midazolam injection with a syringe and needle. An acceptable relative bioavailability, compatible with emergency practice, was also shown in multiple settings. Higher mean concentrations within the first 10min with the ZENEO® device, and quicker two-step injection suggest a faster onset of action, and thereby an earlier seizure termination, thus preventing the occurrence of prolonged seizure and neurological complications. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05026567. Registration first posted August 30, 2021, first patient enrolled May 9, 2022.

Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Standard Astaxanthin and its Micellar Formulation in HealthyMale Volunteers.

Astaxanthin is a naturally occurring carotenoid with high anti-oxidant properties, but it is a very lipophilic compound with low oral bioavailability. This study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of a novel astaxanthin preparation based on micellar solubilization technology, NovaSOL® 400-mg capsules (Test product), and those of astaxanthin 400-mg capsules (reference product), after single oral dose administration to healthy male adults. A single oral dose (400 mg equivalent to 8 mg astaxanthin) of test and reference astaxanthin were administered with 240 mL of water to 12 volunteers according to crossover design, in two phases, with a washout period of 1week in between. Blood samples were collected at hourly intervals for the first 12 h, then at 24.0, 48.0, and 72.0 h after administration. Aliquots of plasma were centrifuged and the clear supernatant was injected into the high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) system. Plasma concentration of astaxanthin versus time profiles were constructed, and the primary pharmacokinetic parameters, maximum concentration (Cmax), area under concentration time curve from time of administration (0) to time (t) [AUC0-t] or to infinity ∞, [AUC0-∞], half-life (T½) and time to reach Cmax (Tmax)were calculated. The test micellar astaxanthin reached a Cmax of 7.21 µg/ml after 3.67 h compared to only 3.86 µg/ml after 8.5 h for the reference native astaxanthin. Micellar formulation of astaxanthin is capable of producing a high concentration of astaxanthin in plasma in a shorter time, thereby expected to provide faster potential therapeutic efficacy.

Evaluation of Ornidazole Tablets Bioequivalence in Chinese Healthy Participants Under Fasted and Fed Conditions Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters.

Ornidazole, the third generation of nitroimidazole derivatives after metronidazole and tinidazole, it exerts both bactericidal and antiprotozoal effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence of two ornidazole tablets manufactured by two different manufacturers based on their pharmacokinetic parameters. Fasted and fed healthy Chinese volunteers participated in a randomized sequence, single-dose, open-label, two-period crossover trial. There were 24 participants in both the fed studyand the fastedstudy. Following a 7-day washout period before receiving the alternative formulation, eligible research participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dosage of either the reference formulation or the test formulation. Following tablet administration, plasma samples were obtained over 72 h and analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to evaluate ornidazole contents. maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax),the area under the curve (AUC) from t = 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), AUCfrom t = 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), half-life (t1/2),and terminal elimination rate constant (z) were evaluated as pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The safety evaluation involved adverse events (AEs) incidence and alterations in laboratory tests (hepatic function, blood biochemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) or vital signs (temperature, pulse, and blood pressure). For the bioequivalence assessment in the fast trial, the prime PK parameters comparison between the reference and test formulation revealed that the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC0-t, Cmax, and AUC0-∞ were 100.97% (99.12-102.85%), 99.88% (90.63-110.08%), and 101.12% (99.17-103.11%), respectively. For the bioequivalence assessment in the fed trial, the key PK parameters comparison between the reference and test formulations revealed that the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC0-t, Cmax, and AUC0-∞ were 103.00% (100.94-105.11%), 101.90% (99.63-104.22%), and 102.99% (100.87-105.16%), respectively. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-72, and AUC0-∞) between the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were all within the range of 80.00-125.00% for both the fasting and fed states. Both treatments have comparable safety profiles. The bioequivalence and tolerability of ornidazole tablet reference and test formulations were evaluated among healthy Chinese participants under both fasting and fed conditions. The results indicated that both formulations were bioequivalent and generally well tolerated; besides, the interaction between food and drug may affect drug pharmacokinetics. CTR20212873, registered on 15 November 2021; ChiCTR2300069098, registered on 7 March 2023.

Bioequivalence of Rivaroxaban Hard Capsules vs. Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy White Volunteers

Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant that is a selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor. It is used to prevent thrombotic events of atherosclerotic etiology and to prevent stroke and peripheral embolism in adult patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of studies was to assess the bioequivalence of two orally administered products: test (Zarixa hard capsules) vs. reference (Xarelto® film-coated tablets). Two crossover, 2-period, randomized, open-label, laboratory-blinded studies were conducted in healthy White male and female volunteers. A single oral dose (Study 1: 10 mg fasting, Study 2: 20 mg fed) of the test or reference product was followed by a minimum 7-day washout. Blood was collected up to 48 h after administration. Plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The bioequivalence criteria for 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the log-transformed geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for the two primary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-t) and Cmax) were set at 80.00-125.00%. Vital signs, laboratory parameters, and adverse events were monitored. 34 of 36 volunteers completed Study 1, and geometric mean ratios were 97.96% (90% CI 93.69-102.42%) for AUC(0-t), and 89.35% (90% CI 84.28-94.72%) for Cmax. All 36 volunteers completed Study 2, and geometric mean ratios were 103.57% (90% CI 98.75-108.63%) for AUC(0-t), and 95.17% (90% CI 87.35-103.70%) for Cmax. All of 90% CIs for the primary pharmacokinetic parameter ratios met acceptance criteria. There were no serious adverse events. Results of both studies indicate that the test product (Zarixa) is bioequivalent to the reference product (Xarelto®). Both products were well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Apremilast Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects Under Fasting and Postprandial States.

This study compared the pharmacokinetics, safety and bioequivalence (BE) of generic and original apremilast tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial conditions, providing sufficient evidence for abbreviated new drug application. A randomized, open-label, two-formulation, single-dose, two-period crossover pharmacokinetic study was performed. Thirty-two eligible healthy Chinese subjects were enrolled in fasting and postprandial studies, respectively. In each trial, subjects received a single 30-mg dose of the test or reference apremilast tablet, followed by a 7-day washout interval between periods. Serial blood samples were obtained for up to 48 h post-intake in each period, and the plasma concentrations of apremilast were determined by a validated method. The primary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, including the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞), were calculated using the non-compartmental method. The geometric mean ratios of the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were acquired for bioequivalence analysis. The safety of both formulations was also evaluated. Under fasting and postprandial states, the PK parameters of the test drug were similar to those of the reference drug. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the test to reference formulations were 94.09-103.44% for Cmax, 94.05-103.51% for AUC0-t, and 94.56-103.86% for AUC0-∞ under fasting conditions, and 99.18-112.48% for Cmax, 98.79-106.02% for AUC0-t, and 98.95-105.89% for AUC0-∞ under postprandial conditions, all of which were within the bioequivalence range of 80.00-125.00%. Both formulations were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred during the study. The trial confirmed that the PK parameters of the generic and original apremilast tablets were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and postprandial states, which met the predetermined regulatory standards. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. chinaDrugtrials.org.cn, identifier CTR20191056 (July 30, 2019); chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300076806 (October 19, 2023).

Determination of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Icotinib in Rat Plasma using UPLC-MS/MS and its Application In vivo Pharmacokinetic

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of icotinib concentrations in blood plasma. Methods: For plasma sample preparation, protein precipitation with acetonitrile was utilized. Analytes were separated on a Kinetex C18 column using 10 mM ammonium acetate containing 0.2% formic acid and methanol (30:70) as the mobile phase, with a gradient flow rate ranging from 0.2 ml·min-1 to 0.4 ml·min-1. The total chromatographic analysis duration was 4.5 minutes. The UPLC system was connected to a mass spectrometer via an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface operated in positive ion mode. Mass monitoring was conducted in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes, with precursor-to-product transitions being m/z 392.06→304.07 for icotinib and m/z 248.00→120.09 for the internal standard, tinidazole. This method has been used for a pharmacokinetic study in rats that were orally administered a single dose of 30 mg/kg icotinib. Results: The assay showed good linearity over concentration ranges of 1-1000 ng/ml for icotinib, with the correlation coefficient exceeding 0.99. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was established at 1 ng/ml. Both intra- and inter-day precisions (RSD, %) were below 8.23%. The results demonstrated that stability, matrix effect, extraction recovery, carryover effect and dilution stability were all within the acceptable conditions. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters in SD rats after oral administration of icotinib (30 mg·kg-1 ) were as follows: t1/2 = (2.92 ± 0.87)h, Cmax = (2168.65 ± 268.72)ng/ml, Tmax = (0.70 ± 0.27)h, AUC=(9.69 ± 1.95)ug/mL•h, Vd = (14.51 ± 5.60)L, and CL = (3.19 ± 0.59)L/h. Conclusion: A simple and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of icotinib in pharmacokinetic studies.

Mixing energy as an adjustment tool for aerodynamic behaviour of an inhaled product: In-vitro and in-vivo effects

This paper describes the development of a fixed dose dry powder combination of indacaterol maleate (Inda) and glycopyrronium bromide (Glyco) in Easyhaler® inhaler for a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study, as well as the outcome of such a study. The development aim was to produce formulations with three different in vitro dispersibility profiles for both Inda and Glyco. This so-called ‘rake’ approach allows for quantitation of the candidate formulations relative to the reference product Ultibro® Breezhaler® in terms of the key PK parameters.Three formulations (A, B and C) were produced based on the mixing energy concept. For both APIs, formulation A (lowest mixing energy) displayed the highest fine particle fractions and formulation C (highest mixing energy) the lowest. GMP manufacturing confirmed the performance of the three formulations.The candidate formulations were tested against the reference product in a single dose PK study in healthy volunteers. Clear differences in Inda plasma concentration profiles were observed between the treatments when administered concomitantly with charcoal, with Easyhaler A showing the highest Cmax value and Easyhaler C the lowest. Easyhaler B was bioequivalent to Ultibro Breezhaler with regard to the primary PK parameters of Inda, Cmax and AUC72h. For Glyco, Easyhaler formulations A, B and C provided lower peak concentrations than Ultibro Breezhaler. For AUC72h of Glyco, Easyhaler B was bioequivalent to the reference product. Additional measures for adjustment of formulation performance can be foreseen, whose effects can be predicted based on mixing energy theory.

Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetics Study of Two Zidovudine/Lamivudine Tablets in Chinese Healthy Volunteers.

Zidovudine/lamivudine tablets are nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors that are used to treat human immunodeficiency virus. The objective of this study was to investigate the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of test and reference preparations of zidovudine/lamivudine tablets in healthy Chinese subjects. We designed a randomized, open, single-center, single-dose, 2-crossover experiment with a 7-day washout period involving 20 healthy subjects. The subjects were given a single dose of the test or reference preparation after fasting overnight for 10hours. Blood samples were subsequently collected at scheduled time points from 0hour (preadministration) up to 24hours postadministration. The plasma concentrations of zidovudine and lamivudine were determined by a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare differences in the mean values of key PK parameters between the 2 preparations. Bioequivalence was evaluated by 2 one-sided t-tests and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR). In total, 19 of the 20 subjects completed the trial. Based on the analysis of PK parameters, the relative bioavailability of zidovudine and lamivudine was 101.1% ± 2.0% and 100.3% ± 1.5%, respectively. ANOVA found no significant difference in primary PK parameters when compared between the 2 formulations, and the 90% CIs of the GMR of the 2 formulations were within the bioequivalence margins of 80%-125%. No serious adverse events occurred. Thus, we confirmed that the 2 preparations were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese volunteers. Our analysis demonstrated that both products showed good tolerance in all subjects.

Unveiling the Influence of a High-Fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Globalagliatin, A Glucokinase Activator, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Glucokinase (GK) plays a pivotal role in maintaining glucose homeostasis; globalagliatin, a newly developed drug, is a GK activator (GKA). This study constitutes a randomized, open-label, two-cycle, two-crossover, single-dose, phase I clinical trial conducted at a single center with healthy Chinese volunteers, aiming to examine the influence of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally administered globalagliatin. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomly divided into two groups, with a washout period of 16 days between the two cycles. The first cycle involved Group 1 volunteers who were orally administered globalagliatin 80 mg with 240 mL of water while fasting on Day 1. In contrast, Group 2 volunteers began oral administration of globalagliatin 80 mg with 240 mL of water, 30 min after consuming a high-fat meal (where high-fat content contributed to 54% of the total calories; the high-calorie meal amounted to 988.4 kcal). After the washout period, both groups of volunteers entered the second cycle of drug administration, with meals and medication being swapped on Day 17. Each volunteer collected blood samples at the following time points: 0h (within 1h before administration), and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 168h after administration on both trial Day 1 and Day 17. The primary and secondary PK parameters were collected. The validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine the concentration of globalagliatin in collected plasma samples, and the results were analyzed using Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety evaluation was conducted by detecting or observing various adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). All 24 healthy Chinese volunteers enrolled completed the study and underwent PK analysis. The maximum concentration (Cmax; ng/mL), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUCt; h·ng/mL), and AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞; h·ng/mL) of fasting administration were 22.35±7.02, 725.74±303.04, and 774.07±343.89, respectively, while the Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ administered after a high-fat meal were 28.95±12.60, 964.84±333.99, and 1031.28±392.80, respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ for high-fat meal/fasting administration of globalagliatin were 124.81%, 135.24%, and 135.42%, respectively, with 90% confidence intervals of 109.97-141.65, 124.24-147.20, and 124.42-147.39, respectively. Compared with the fasting state, healthy volunteers who consumed a high-fat meal showed a 24.8% increase in Cmax, a 35.2% increase in AUCt, and a 35.4% increase in AUC∞. The geometric mean of Tmax was 4.69h under fasting conditions and 5.93h in a high-fat state, with a median of 4.98h. Among the 24 enrolled volunteers, 9 cases (37.5%) had 11 AEs, and 6 cases (25.0%) had 7 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after medication, all of which were cured or improved without taking any treatment measures. There were no SAEs in this study, no volunteers withdrew from the study due to AEs or ADRs, and no hypoglycemic events occurred during the trial. A high-fat meal increased the Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞ of globalagliatin compared with fasting conditions in healthy Chinese adult volunteers. Meanwhile, globalagliatin showed favorable safety and tolerability under fasting or high-fat meal conditions.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of sunitinib and Sutent® in Chinese healthy subjects: an open-label, randomized, crossover study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence and safety of generic sunitinib and its original product Sutent® in healthy Chinese subjects through a phase-I clinical trial. Methods: The study selected two groups of 24 healthy Chinese subjects in a 1:1 ratio through random allocation. Each participant received either 12.5mg of sunitinib or Sutent® per cycle. A total of 15 different time points were employed for blood sample collection during each cycle. Furthermore, a comprehensive assessment of the drugs' safety was consistently maintained throughout the trial. Results: The average adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% CI) for the primary PK parameters Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were 97.04% (93.06%-101.19%), 98.45% (93.27%-103.91%) and 98.22% (93.15%-103.56%), respectively. The adjusted GMRs for essential pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters all met the requirements for bioequivalence, with values within the acceptable range of 80%-125%. In addition, the two drugs showed comparable results for the other PK parameters. These results indicate that the two drugs were bioequivalent. Furthermore, both drugs showed well safety. Conclusion: The research results proved that the PK and safety profiles of sunitinib in healthy Chinese subjects were comparable to those of Sutent®. These results advocate the clinical application of generic sunitinib as a potential alternative to original product Sutent® in the treatment of certain medical conditions.

Pooled analysis of three pharmacokinetic studies comparing biosimilar MB02 and reference bevacizumab.

The aim of this study was to add robustness and provide further evidence on the bioequivalence, safety and immunogenicity between MB02 and reference bevacizumab. No similar study has been performed before with a biosimilar monoclonal antibody. Population analysis by pooling data from three independent pharmacokinetic (PK) studies was performed. The studies had a single-dose, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group design and two studies, MB02-A-02-17 and MB02-A-05-18, compared MB02 to EU- and US-bevacizumab in Caucasian subjects, while study MB02-A-04-18 compared MB02 and EU-bevacizumab in Japanese participants. Primary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero and extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and AUC from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t ). Secondary endpoints included other PK parameters, safety and immunogenicity. A sensitivity analysis using actual protein concentration as a correction factor was applied to primary PK parameters. Point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of primary PK parameters for MB02, EU- and US-bevacizumab were all contained within the predefined bioequivalence margins (80%-125%) for all pairwise comparisons. The same results for all pairwise comparisons were observed when protein-corrected primary PK parameters were analyzed. Safety and immunogenicity were similar between MB02 and the EU- and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy subjects. This pooled analysis of three comparable PK studies further supports the bioequivalence of biosimilar MB02 to EU- and US-reference bevacizumab. No clinically meaningful differences in safety or immunogenicity were observed.