Primary Language Status Research Articles

Measurement Invariance for Multilingual Learners Using Item Response and Response Time in PISA 2018

AbstractThis study examines potential assessment bias based on students' primary language status in PISA 2018. Specifically, multilingual (MLs) and nonmultilingual (non‐MLs) students in the United States are compared with regard to their response time as well as scored responses across three cognitive domains (reading, mathematics, and science). Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis reveals that 7–14% of items exhibit DIF‐related problems in scored responses between the two groups, aligning with PISA technical report results. While MLs generally spend more time on the test than non‐MLs across cognitive levels, differential response time (DRT) functioning identifies significant time differences in 7–10% of items for students with similar cognitive levels. It was noticeable that items with DIF and DRT issues show limited overlap, suggesting diverse reasons for student struggles in the assessment. A deeper examination of item characteristics is recommended for test developers and teachers to gain a better understanding of these nuances.

Disparities in pathways to reduction mammaplasty: A single institution review of 425 women with macromastia

BackgroundReduction mammaplasty improves the quality of life by providing functional and aesthetic benefits to women with macromastia. This study contributes to the existing literature on socioeconomic and clinical barriers to referral for plastic surgery procedures by focusing specifically on reduction mammaplasty. MethodsPatients with macromastia were identified via a chart review in a single institution from 2021–2022. The treatment pathway for each patient was characterized by reception of referral, completion of plastic surgery consultation, and eventual reception of surgery. After controlling for clinical covariates, multivariate logistic regression was applied to quantify the independent impact of race, insurance, and language status on the completion of surgery (p < 0.05). ResultsThe final patient cohort included 425 women with macromastia. Among the 151 patients who were first seen by a primary care physician, 64 (42%) completed an initial plastic surgery consultation. Among all patients, 160 (38%) eventually underwent reduction mammaplasty. Multivariate regression predictions indicated a lower likelihood of completing breast reduction surgery in patients with current smoking history (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01–0.59) and higher body mass index (BMI) (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.97) (p < 0.05). Minority race and ethnicity, private insurance status, and primary language status were not significant predictors of this outcome (p > 0.05). ConclusionsIn this study, the socioeconomic variables were not independent predictors of breast reduction surgery completion. However, the association of minority race and ethnicity and nonprivate insurance status with the most common reasons for breast reduction deferral suggest an indirect influence of socioeconomic status on the treatment pathway.

5 Poorer Memory Outcomes are Observed in Underinsured Latino Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome

Objective:Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) is a constellation of deleterious cardiometabolic health conditions (e.g., diabetes, hypertension) that have been linked to cognitive impairment and accelerated cognitive decline in older adults. Research has shown that Latinos are at increased risk for developing MetS relative to non-Latino Whites and the prevention, maintenance, and treatment of cardiometabolic risk factors are largely contingent upon health insurance status. Within the United States there are considerable state-based differences in eligibility and access to health insurance coverage. Although Texas has the second largest population of Latinos, they are one of the most underinsured groups within the state. There is some evidence to suggest that inconsistent healthcare is associated with cognitive impairment among underserved/underprivileged groups. The current study sought to examine whether insurance status moderates the association between MetS and cognitive functioning in an effort to inform public health policy initiatives vital to reducing age-related health disparities amongst Latino older adults residing in Texas.Participants and Methods:The study sample included 850 primarily Spanish-speaking (67.6%) Latino older adults (mean age = 63.1±7.81) largely of Mexican origin/descent (95%) enrolled in the Health and Aging Brain Study-Health Disparities. All participants completed neuropsychological testing, a health exam, and questions about health insurance coverage. MetS status (MetS+ vs. MetS-) was determined by abnormal clinical abdominal obesity, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, blood pressure, and fasting glucose values. Health insurance status was determined by current enrollment in any private or public insurance plan. Cognition was assessed with Digit Span, Logical Memory I and II, Trail Making Test (A and B), Spanish-English Verbal Learning Test, and Letter Fluency (FAS). Raw scores were converted to z-scores which were subsequently averaged into two distinct memory and executive functioning composite scores. ANCOVAs controlling for age, sex, education, APOE e4 positivity, annual income, and primary language status were used examine health insurance status x MetS interactions on cognitive composites.Results:Approximately 54.6% of the sample met clinical criteria for MetS+ and 23.6% endorsed having no health insurance. There were no significant group differences in the proportion of MetS+ and MetS- individuals with and without health insurance (X 2 = .002, p =.96). Results revealed there was a significant MetS x health insurance status interaction on the memory composite (F = 5.39, p = .02). Post-hoc comparisons revealed that Latino older adults without health insurance demonstrated poorer memory performance relative to those with health insurance in the MetS+ group (p=.02). In contrast, there were no significant differences in memory performance across insurance status in the MetS- group (p=.35). Finally, there was no significant MetS x health insurance interaction on executive functioning (p=.60).Conclusions:Findings revealed that health insurance coverage differentially impacts memory, but not executive functioning, amongst Latinos with MetS+. Underinsured Latinos with chronic cardiometabolic health conditions may be at risk for poor memory outcomes and increasing access to affordable healthcare could help mitigate the adverse effects of MetS+ on memory. Future studies examining the relationship between health insurance, MetS status, and neuroimaging markers may yield additional insight into mechanisms underlying age-related dementia disparities.

Adult congenital heart disease care in a municipal public health system.

Specialty care is associated with improved outcomes for adults with adult CHD and must be extended to the underserved. A retrospective cohort study was performed to describe the provision of care to adult CHD patients in America's largest municipal public health system including patient demographics, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance. We identified 229 adult CHD patients aged >18 years through electronic medical records. The most common diagnoses were atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, and valvular pulmonary stenosis. In total, 65% had moderate or greater anatomic complexity. A large number of patients were uninsured (45%), non-white (96%), and non-English speaking (44%). One hundred forty-six patients (64%) presented with unrepaired primary defects. Fifty eight patients underwent primary repair during the study period; 48 of those repairs were surgical and 10 were transcatheter. Collaboration with an affiliated Comprehensive Care Center was utilised for 28% of patients. A high proportion of patients received adult CHD speciality visits (78%), echocardiograms (66%), and electrocardiograms (56%) at the guideline-recommended frequency throughout the study period. There was no significant difference in the rate of adherence to guideline-recommended surveillance based on insurance status, race/ethnicity, or primary language status. The proportion of patients who had guideline-recommended adult CHD visits, echocardiograms, and electrocardiograms was significantly lower for those with more advanced physiological stages. These results can inform the provision of adult CHD care in other public health system settings.