Primary Infected Aortic Aneurysms Research Articles

Outcomes Following Different Management of Mycotic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

The objective was to present our experience on managing mycotic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (MIAAA) through a retrospective cohort study. Data of patients with MIAAA managed in our center from July 2016 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis of MIAAA was made based on: (1) preoperative clinical signs of infection; (2) elevated serologic infection parameters; (3) para-aneurysmal infection features on enhanced computed tomography; and (4) positive blood or tissue cultures. All the patients received standard antibiotic therapy. Surgical management including endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), initial EVAR followed by open re-operation, and initial open surgical repair (OSR) were conducted according to disease seriosity, physical condition, and patient's will. Infection index and clinical outcome were evaluated during the follow-up time. A total of 23 patients (21 men; averaged=66.3 years, range=49-79 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 19.9 months (range=1-75 months). Bacteria culture from blood or tissue specimen was positive in 15 patients (Salmonella, n=8; Escherichia coli, n=3; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA], n=1; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n=1; Staphylococcus epidermidis, n=1; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, n=1). Seven patients received OSR as the initial surgical intervention, whereas 14 patients chose EVAR instead. The 2 conservatively managed patients (refused surgery) died within 30 days. The 7 patients who received initial OSR survived till now. Among the 14 patients who underwent initial EVAR, infection deteriorated without exception (14/14, 100%). Three of these patients refused re-operation and died within 6 months. Eleven patients received secondary surgical intervention (10 cases of aneurysm and endograft resection, thorough debridement, subclavian to bi-femoral artery bypass, or in situ aorta reconstruction; 1 case of laparoscopic debridement) and 7 survived the follow-up time. The overall mortality rate was 39.1% (9/23). The mortality rates differed greatly following different intervention methods (merely antibiotic management, 100%; initial open operation, 0%; initial EVAR without secondary operation, 100%; initial EVAR plus secondary operation, 36.4%). Open surgical repair is still the first choice for hemodynamically stable and low-risk patients. Merely EVAR is related with disastrous results, which should be reserved as a temporary alternative for patients with ruptured aneurysms, hemodynamic instability or high surgical risk, and followed by timely secondary OSR. The management of mycotic or primary-infected aortic aneurysm is challenging; treatment remains controversial. Our center has reviewed our experience over the past 6 years and found that open surgical repair is still the first choice for hemodynamically stable and low-risk patients. Merely endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is related with disastrous results, which should be reserved as a temporary alternative for patients with ruptured aneurysms, hemodynamic instability or high surgical risk, and followed by timely secondary open surgical repair.

A Comparison of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes for Primary Infected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Primary infected abdominal aortic aneurysms (PIAAAs) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Three repair approaches include open in-situ repair (OIR), extra-anatomic repair (EAR), and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study is one of the largest single-center case series comparing the outcomes of the different surgical approaches for PIAAA. This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated surgically for PIAAA between 2000 and 2021. PIAAA diagnosis was defined as the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with evidence of infection on clinical presentation, laboratory markers, radiology, or surgically. Patients with prior aortic surgery were excluded from this study. Basic demographics were compared across the 3 surgical groups using standard statistical methods. Our primary outcomes included mortality at 1 and 5 years. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and compared using log-rank testing. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were created to assess determinants of mortality. A total of 43 patients were included in the full cohort. Patients undergoing EVAR more often had diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and coronary artery disease. EVAR was also more often done in patients with a saccular aneurysm rather than fusiform. (93% vs. 70% in EAR and 42% in OIR; P=0.015). All-cause mortality rates at 1 year were not significantly different between the 3 groups. Survival at 5years did show a significant benefit of OIR over EVAR and EAR: OIR had an 8% mortality rate with EAR having a 53% rate and EVAR having the highest (72%) mortality rate at 5 years (P=0.03). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that EVAR (aHR 12.1, (95% CI 1.42 to 103.9), P=0.02) and EAR (aHR 15.1, (95% CI 1.59 to 143.3), P=0.0.02) had an increased 5-year mortality risk when compared to OIR. Repair of primary infected aortic aneurysm is associated with high complication and mortality rates regardless of the approach. In our studied sample, OIR offered an improved long-term survival without added benefits in terms of complication rates. In infected AAA, EVAR should be considered bridging stage between the urgent situation and eventual open repair.

Open versus endovascular repair of primary infected thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Primary infected aortic aneurysms are life-threatening if not treated promptly, but still possess a high mortality rate following open repair. The goal of treatment is to prevent rupture and clear infection. An endovascular approach is accepted as a bridge to definitive open repair. Our study compares the outcomes of endovascular versus conventional open repair of infected aortic aneurysms. A single-center retrospective review was conducted of data from January 2012 to December 2021. Patients were categorized into three cohorts according to aortic involvement: thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The primary endpoint was survival rate and the assessment of any associated factors. Ninety-nine patients presented with infected aortic aneurysms. Of the 56 patients who presented with infected TAA, 38 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and 18 patients underwent open TAA repair. Forty patients presented with infected AAA, of which 21 patients underwent endovascular aortic repair and 19 patients underwent open repair. Three patients presented with infected TAAA and all underwent open repair. The mean age was 67years (range 33-88); 74 patients (74.8%) were men and 71 patients (71.7%) had immune dysfunction. Mean follow-up time was 24months in the endovascular repair group and 38months in the open repair group. The probability survival rate in the endovascular repair group was 86%, 86%, 77% and 51% at 1year, 2years, 5years and 10years, respectively, and in the open repair group this was 81%, 81%, 76%, and 64% at 1year, 2years, 5years and 10years, respectively. Endovascular repair for primary infected aortic aneurysms plays an important role in current practice as an alternate to open surgery or used as bridging to definitive open surgical repair. No significant difference was observed in either short- or long-term survival in patients with infected aortic aneurysm undergoing open or endovascular repairs.

PRIMARILY INFECTED ANEURYSM OF THE INFRARENAL PORTION OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTA

Primarily infected aneurysm of the abdominal aorta is a rare but life-threatening disease that is difficult to diagnose. The progression of the disease and absence of timely surgical treatment lead to development of such complications as a rupture, which is accompanied by an extremely high mortality rate. The article presents a clinical case of a verified infected aneurysm of the infrarenal aorta caused by Citrobacter freundii . The clinical case describes successful treatment of a primary infected aortic aneurysm with open surgical resection and revascularization by aortic-bifemoral bypass. The intraoperative findings allowed to suspect that the aneurysm was infected, and a sample from its lumen was taken for bacteriological examination. The specific features of the course of the postoperative period were a long-term remitting fever, a long period of lymphorrhea from areas of postoperative wounds. This condition required adjustment of the antibacterial therapy according to the sensitivity of the detected Citrobacter freundii .

Primary Infected Aortic Aneurysm: Clinical Presentation, Pathogen, and Outcome.

Infected aneurysm of the aorta and adjacent arteries is rarely occurring and can be fatal without surgical intervention. Within the medical community, the most efficacious treatment strategy to address infected aortic aneurysm remains controversial. In this study, we have reviewed our treatment experience with 109 patients. We included in our study all consecutive patients treated for primary infected aortic aneurysm at our facility between 1995 and 2011. Aneurysm-related mortality was defined as the presence of in-hospital and late mortality related to infection or postoperative complications. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 35-88), and 87 (80%) were male. Pathogen was isolated in 101 patients, and the most common microorganism identified was non-typhoid Salmonella in 61 (60%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus in 16 (16%) and Streptococci species in 7 (7%). Eighty-five (78%) patients underwent surgical treatment. Surgery included open repair with in-situ graft replacement in 77 (71%) and endovascular repair in 8 (7%). The aneurysm-related mortality rate was 67% in medically treated and 21% in surgically treated patients, with a median follow-up duration of 31.5 months (range 1-189). Additionally, risk factors for aneurysm-related mortality included old age, chronic lung disease, psoas muscle abscess, short duration of preoperative antibiotics, no operation, and probably endovascular repair. Non-typhoid Salmonella was the most common pathogen found in our study group patients with infected aortic aneurysm. It appears that prolonged preoperative antibiotic treatment followed by open in-situ graft replacement remains the preferred and most effective treatment strategy. Infected aortic aneurysm; Outcome; Pathogen; Surgery.

Endovascular Treatment of Infected Aortic Aneurysms

ObjectiveTo report on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with primary infected aortic aneurysm (IAA) treated by stent graft (SG) in two centers. Material and methodOver a period of 15 years, 32 patients with IAA underwent endovascular treatment. None had undergone previous aortic surgery. The causal relationship was gastrointestinal infection in 9 patients (28%), endovascular diagnostic/therapeutic procedures/resuscitation in 6 (19%), wound infection after previous surgeries in 5 (16%), urinary infection in 4 (13%), urology or gastroenterology procedures in 3 (9%), pancreatitis in 2 (6%), endocarditis in 1 (3%) and phlebitis in 1 (3%) patient. We implanted 11 bifurcated, 10 tubular thoracic, 4 aorto-uni-iliac, 4 tubular abdominal and 1 iliac SG. Two other surgeries were hybrid procedures. ResultsThe etiological agent was identified in 28 (88%) patients. Twenty-six (81%) patients survived the 30-day postoperative period. Sixteen (50%) survived to 1-year follow-up and 13 (40.6%) survived to 3-year follow-up. Three patients have survived for less than 1 year and a further 3 for less than 3 years, so far. Among patients with aneurysms situated in central parts of the thoracic and infrarenal aorta there was a better death/survival ratio than among patients with a proximal or distal aneurysm location. ConclusionThe implantation of a SG may be an alternative to open surgery in selected groups of patients with primary IAA. Aneurysms of the central part of the thoracic or abdominal aorta have a more favorable prognosis with endovascular treatment.

Treatment of primary infected aortic aneurysm without aortic resection

We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of two different treatment strategies for patients with primary infected aortic aneurysms, including antibiotic treatment alone and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with aggressive antibiotic treatment, as alternatives to the established treatment of open surgical repair. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were treated for infected aortic aneurysm without undergoing aortic resection from January 2000 to December 2010 at a single institution. A total of 40 patients underwent traditional open repair during the study period. Sixteen patients with infected aortic aneurysm (11 men; median age, 70; range, 44-80 years) were identified as not having undergone aortic resection during the 11 years reviewed in the study. Nine patients received antibiotic treatment only (group I) and seven patients underwent EVAR with aggressive antibiotic treatment (group II). Salmonella species were isolated from seven patients in group I, and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from the remaining two patients. In group II, six patients had blood culture results showing Salmonella species and one patient had a blood culture result showing Escherichia coli. Group I (7 of 9 patients; 78%) had a higher hospital mortality rate than group II (0%; P = .003). Mean follow-up among survivors was 10 ± 15 months (range, 1-37 months). One patient in group II developed a reinfection episode (14%). There was no significant difference between group I (67%; SE, 27.2%) and group II (86%; SE, 13.2%) in the 3-month survival rates (log-rank, P = .39). Our results support the premise that EVAR is beneficial for the patients with infected aortic aneurysm. Treating an infected aortic aneurysm with antibiotics alone could not stop aneurysm expansion and eradicate the aortic infection before the aneurysm ruptures. For the patients with infected aortic aneurysms who have limited life expectancy and multiple comorbidities, EVAR with aggressive antibiotic treatment should be considered preferentially over antibiotic treatment alone.

What is the Best Treatment for Primary Infected Aortic Aneurysms?

What is the Best Treatment for Primary Infected Aortic Aneurysms?

Infected aortic aneurysms: clinical outcome and risk factor analysis

Purpose Infected aortic aneurysms are difficult to treat, and are associated with significant mortality. Hospital survival is poor in patients with severe aortic infection, Salmonella species infection, Staphylococcus aureus infection, aneurysm rupture, and suprarenal aneurysm location. We reviewed the clinical outcome in 46 patients with primary infected aortic aneurysms and identified clinical variables associated with prognosis. Methods Data were collected by means of retrospective chart review. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used for risk factor analysis. Results Between August 1995 and March 2003, 48 patients with primary infected aortic aneurysms were treated at our hospitals. Two patients with negative culture results were excluded. Of the remaining 46 patients, 35 patients had aortic aneurysms infected with Salmonella species and 11 patients had aortic aneurysms infected with microorganisms other than Salmonella species. There were 20 suprarenal infections and 26 infrarenal infections. Surgical debridement and in situ graft replacement were performed in 35 patients, with an early mortality rate of 11%. The incidence of late prosthetic graft infection was 10%. The 90-day mortality rate in patients operated on was 0% for elective operation and 36% for nonelective operation ( P = .006, Fisher exact test). Independent predictors of aneurysm-related death were advanced age, non- Salmonella infection, and no operation. Conclusion With timely surgical intervention and prolonged antibiotic treatment, in situ graft replacement provides an excellent outcome in patients with primary infected aortic aneurysms and elective operation. Mortality is still high in patients undergoing urgent operation. Advanced age, non- Salmonella infection, and no operation are major determinants of mortality.