Primary Health Care Performance Research Articles

Primary care performance in a Ugandan rural district: cross-sectional descriptive study.

To strengthen primary health care (PHC), there is a need to measure its performance. To measure primary care performance in one rural Ugandan district. A cross-sectional survey of Tororo District administered the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) across a sample of 51 facilities. There were four levels of health facilities (health centres II to general hospital). Random sample of 100 users was obtained from each level while including all primary care providers and managers. Data was collected in REDCap software, and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences vs23. Only 35.1% of users had a strong affiliation with their PHC facility. Overall primary care score suggested that performance was acceptable to the majority of users (58.9% rating performance at least acceptable). Ongoing care was rated by users as very poor (<25% of people rating it at least acceptable). Comprehensiveness (services available) was rated poor by users (<50% finding it at least acceptable). Users rated first contact access and coordination (information systems) acceptable (51-75% finding them at least acceptable). Person-centredness and comprehensiveness (services provided) were rated good by users (>75% rating them as acceptable or more). Providers and users differed significantly in their scoring across all domains, with providers usually more positive. Performance significantly improved as the PHC level increased. Primary care performance in the study district was sub-optimal. The PCAT identified primary care functions that needed improving and may be a useful tool to measure PHC performance across the region.

Assessing primary healthcare quality through avoidable hospitalizations: a systematic review

Abstract Background Avoidable hospitalization (AH) for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) has been widely used as a measure of the performance of primary health care. However, the lack of a standardized definition of these conditions and the absence of conclusive evidence regarding their efficacy across diverse healthcare settings remain significant challenges. This review aims to systematically identify and synthesize the utilization of AH for ACSCs as a metric for evaluating the quality of primary healthcare (PHC) and factors influencing such quality. Methods We conducted a systematic search for peer-reviewed studies on 3 electronic databases. Studies that used AH for ACSCs to investigate the quality of PHC were included. The following characteristics were extracted: study design, ACSCs definition, AH rates, intervention if applicable, PHC and or patients’ characteristics associated to AH rates, such as accessibility, continuity of care, demographics, socio-economic status, and comorbidities. Results 73 relevant articles were identified, published between 1994 and 2023 and mostly in USA. Preliminary findings based on 56 articles indicate that the majority (48.2%) employed the list of ACSCs from the AHRQ (i.e. the prevention quality indicators) (48.2%). Meanwhile, 12 studies (17.9%) used lists developed or modified by the authors, and another 7 (12.5%) adopted lists previously utilized in other research. Studies conducted in Brazil, Canada and USA employed lists issued by relevant national institutions. Conclusions Although preliminary, these findings highlight two main trends. Firstly, in countries where health authorities have established a standardized set of ACSCs, a notable uniformity is observed. Conversely, in the absence of such standards, variability in defining these conditions is likely to increase. This variation could hinder the comparability across different Primary Health Care (PHC) service organizations and affect the analysis of care quality. Key messages • Most studies used established indicators for the measuring of primary healthcare quality. • Diverse ACSC definitions across countries impair the generalizability of healthcare quality analysis.

O PAPEL DO AGENTE COMUNITÁRIO DE SAÚDE NA MELHORIA DOS DADOS EPIDEMIOLÓGICOS COMO REDUÇÃO DE ÓBITOS SENSÍVEIS À ATENÇÃO BÁSICA

Introduction: The Community Health Agent (CHA) is responsible for working in the prevention and promotion of health by informing the Family Health Strategy (FHS) team of the population’s needs. Objective: To analyze the responsibilities of CHAs in the care of patients with certain conditions sensitive to primary healthcare, such as Diabetes Mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the municipality of São João Del Rei/MG (SJDR) in the year 2020. Methodology: A quantitative study was conducted using data from the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System (DATASUS), gathering the number of deaths from certain preventable causes due to the performance of Primary Health Care (PHC), alongside a literature review. Results: The municipality of SJDR reported deaths from causes sensitive to PHC interventions, such as DM, HTN, and AMI in 2020. When compared to the state of Minas Gerais, the municipality had nearly twice the number of deaths from HTN and AMI, highlighting the need for patient engagement with PHC, as the high mortality rates from these causes negatively impacted the state’s data. Conclusion: It is concluded that the municipality of SJDR had higher mortality rates from DM, HTN, and AMI compared to the state of Minas Gerais in 2020. These data suggest the need for more effective and targeted interventions to prevent the worsening of these conditions, with the role of CHAs becoming crucial in this contexto.

Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data

BackgroundThe Swedish Primary Health Care (PHC) system has, like in other European countries, undergone a gradual transition towards marketization and privatization, most distinctly through a 2010 choice reform. The reform led to an overall but regionally heterogenous expansion of private PHC providers in Sweden, and with evidence also pointing to possible inequities in various aspects of PHC provision. Evidence on the reform’s impact on population-level primary health care performance and equity in performance remains scarce. The present study therefore aimed to examine whether the increase in private provision after the reform impacted on population-average rates of avoidable hospitalizations, as well as on corresponding socioeconomic inequities.MethodsThis register-based study used a multiple-group interrupted time-series design for the study period 2001–2017, with the study population (N = 51 million observations) randomly drawn from the total Swedish population aged 18–85 years. High, medium, and low implementing comparison groups were classified by tertiles of increase in private PHC providers after the reform. PHC performance was measured by avoidable hospitalizations, and socioeconomic position by education and income. Interrupted time series analysis based on individual-level data was used to estimate the reform impact on avoidable hospitalization risk, and on inequities through the Relative Index of Inequality (RII).ResultsAll three comparisons groups displayed decreasing risk of avoidable hospitalizations but increasing socioeconomic inequities across the study period. Compared to regions with little change in provision after the reform, regions with large increase in private provision saw a steeper decrease in avoidable hospitalizations after the reform (relative risk (95%): 1.6% (1.1; 2.1)), but at the same time steeper increase in inequities (by education: 2.0% (0.1%; 4.0); by income: 2.2% (-0.1; 4.3)).ConclusionsThe study suggests that the increase in private health care centers, enabled by the choice reform, contributed to a small improvement when it comes to overall PHC performance, but simultaneously to increased socioeconomic inequities in PHC performance. This duality in the impact of the Swedish reform also reflects the arguments in the European health policy debate on patient choice PHC models, with hopes of improved performance but fears of increased inequities.

Primary care performance measurement in Brazil (Previne Brasil Program), 2022–2023

BackgroundPrevine Brasil is a new way of financing Primary Health Care (PHC) in Brazil that places users of public health services at the center of the system’s analysis and attention through the use of seven performance indicators. This study aims to analyze the performance of Primary Health Care in Brazil under the new financing model (Previne Brasil) in the period from the first four months of 2022 to the first four months of 2023.MethodsThis is a territorial ecological study using secondary data from the Primary Care Health Information System (SISAB). Seven performance indicators were included and analyzed according to Brazil, its regions, states and capitals. A comparative descriptive analysis was carried out between the spatial units.ResultsOf the seven indicators analyzed, only one (Proportion of pregnant women tested for syphilis and HIV) reached the proposed target considering the average of the four-month periods evaluated (target: 60%; Observed: 62.5%). The Northeast was the region with the best performance, surpassing the target in three of the seven indicators (prenatal consultations, tests for syphilis and HIV in pregnant women and dental care for pregnant women). The states and capitals showed progressive improvement in the performance indicators over the four quarters analyzed, although unevenly between the indicators. The indicators related to hypertension and diabetes were the worst. The Final Synthetic Indicator (FSI) showed an increase in the median over the four quarters (4.78; 5.65; 6.02 6.29), which represents an increase of 1.51 in the indicator between the first four months of 2022 and the first four months of 2023.ConclusionAlthough there have been improvements in the performance of Primary Health Care in Brazil, the achievement of the agreed targets for the indicators seems a long way off. The socio-spatial inequalities in the indicators reflect the country’s health complexity and reinforce the need for policies that take into account the local-regional context.

Global lessons on delivery of primary healthcare services for people with non-communicable diseases: convergent mixed methods

ObjectiveTo extract key lessons on primary healthcare (PHC) service delivery strategies for non-communicable diseases (NCD) from the work of researchers funded by the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases (GACD).DesignA convergent...

Good Management Practice Is Correlated With Good Performance of Community-Engaged Primary Health Care Facilities in Peru.

Increasing prioritization of quality primary health care (PHC) includes community engagement as a key element to improve PHC performance. We assessed the correlation of good regional management practices with PHC performance in Peru in community-comanaged PHC that is designed with multiple accountability mechanisms. We conducted a secondary analysis of a survey of Dirección Regional de Salud (regional health directorates, DIRESAs) regarding their management of public PHC services with collaborative community involvement by a Comunidad Local de Administración de Salud (Local Community for Health Administration, CLAS). CLAS-run facilities have previously shown evidence of superior performance over standard PHC services. We classified survey questions on 5 management functions of the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative: leadership, information system, financial control, transfer of management and leadership skills to health facilities, and supervision. An expert panel designated management practices as "good" or "less effective." The outcome, PHC service performance, was the percentage of CLAS comanaged facilities in each DIRESA achieving coverage and utilization goals. We correlated frequency of good management practices with PHC service performance. DIRESAs were divided into Group 1, "higher performance," and Group 2, "lower performance," to identify specific practices linked to better performance. We identified 32 good management practices among 52 response options to 17 questions. Correlation between good management practice and good service performance was significant (r=.7266; 12 df; P<.01). An average of 91.1% and 37.6% of CLAS facilities achieved service goals in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Of all good management practices identified, an average of 40.6% and 24.0% were used by Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 used 11 specific good practices more frequently than Group 2. Regional management and community-comanaged PHC services designed with accountability mechanisms should be intentionally aligned, incorporating these into policies, budgets, processes, and capacities to strengthen PHC services.

Assessing the WHO-UNICEF primary health-care measurement framework; Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

To assess the availability of information on indicators of the World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund primary health-care measurement framework in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka and to outline the opportunities for and challenges to using the framework in these countries. We reviewed global and national data repositories for quantitative indicators of the framework and conducted a desk review of country documents for qualitative indicators in February-April 2023. We assessed data sources and cross-sectional survey tools to suggest possible sources of information on framework indicators that were not currently reported in the countries. We also identified specific indicators outside the framework on which information is collected in the countries and which could be used to measure primary health-care performance. Data on 54% (32/59) of the quantitative indicators were partially or completely available for the countries, ranging from 41% (24/59) in Pakistan to 64% (38/59) in Nepal. Information on 41% (66/163) of the qualitative subindicators could be acquired through desk reviews of country-specific documents. Information on input indicators was more readily available than on process and output indicators. The feasibility of acquiring information on the unreported indicators was moderate to high through adaptation of data collection instruments. The primary health-care measurement framework provides a platform to readily assess and track the performance of primary health care. Countries should improve the completeness, quality and use of existing data for strengthening of primary health care.

A rapid mixed-methods assessment of Libya’s primary care system

BackgroundLibya has experienced decades of violent conflict that have severely disrupted health service delivery. The Government of National Unity is committed to rebuilding a resilient health system built on a platform of strong primary care.AimCommissioned by the government, we set out to perform a rapid assessment of the system as it stands and identify areas for improvement.Design and settingWe used a rapid applied policy explanatory-sequential mixed-methods design, working with Libyan data and Libyan policymakers, with supporting interview data from other primary care policymakers working across the Middle East and North Africa region.MethodWe used the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative framework to structure our assessment. Review of policy documents and secondary analysis of WHO and World Bank survey data informed a series of targeted policymaker interviews. We used deductive framework analysis to synthesise our findings.ResultsWe identified 11 key documents and six key policymakers to interview. Libya has strong policy commitments to providing good quality primary care, and a high number of health staff and facilities. Access to services and trust in providers is high. However, a third of facilities are non-operational; there is a marked skew towards axillary and administrative staff; and structural challenges with financing, logistics, and standards has led to highly variable provision of care.ConclusionIn reforming the primary care system, the government should consolidate leadership, clarify governance structures and systems, and focus on setting national standards for human resources for health, facilities, stocks, and clinical care.

Performance of primary health care in São Paulo state, Brazil, during the period 2010-2019.

This article presents the results of an analysis of the performance of primary health care in São Paulo state over the last decade against a backdrop of financial crisis and health funding cuts. We conducted a time series analysis (2010-2019) of performance indicators across the following dimensions based on an adapted conceptual framework: health service performance, health system, and determinants of health. Annual percentage change was calculated for each indicator using a log-linear model. Performance across the indicators was generally positive; however, there was a decline in performance across indicators of quality of care (congenital syphilis, cesarean section rate and cervical cancer screening). The findings also show a potential rise in demand for public services (due to population aging and a reduction in the percentage of the population with private health insurance) and increase in health expenditure against a backdrop of falling GDP per capita.

Disability prevention, detection and assistance in primary health care services in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

The objective of this study was to assess the performance of primary health care (PHC) services for disability prevention, detection and assistance in the state of São Paulo. The study included 2739 health services, from 514 municipalities. 128 organizational quality indicators of the QualiAB instrument referring to the evaluative dimension "Attention to disability in primary health care services". The association of health care performance score of each domain with independent variables, health assessment, and support network were tested using of multiple linear regression. The performance percentage was 61.6% for all domains, 73.6% for structure (inputs and human resources), 68.7% for qualification of prenatal care, 56.1% for qualification of child health care, 55.8% for prevention of disabilities related to chronic conditions, and 53.9% for attention to people with disabilities and caregivers. There was a significant association with variables related to the type of service and participation in service evaluations. PHC services still perform incipient actions for the prevention, surveillance and diagnosis of disabilities as well as for comprehensive care for people with disabilities.

Desempenho da atenção primária à saúde no estado de São Paulo, Brasil, no período de 2010-2019

Abstract This article presents the results of an analysis of the performance of primary health care in São Paulo state over the last decade against a backdrop of financial crisis and health funding cuts. We conducted a time series analysis (2010-2019) of performance indicators across the following dimensions based on an adapted conceptual framework: health service performance, health system, and determinants of health. Annual percentage change was calculated for each indicator using a log-linear model. Performance across the indicators was generally positive; however, there was a decline in performance across indicators of quality of care (congenital syphilis, cesarean section rate and cervical cancer screening). The findings also show a potential rise in demand for public services (due to population aging and a reduction in the percentage of the population with private health insurance) and increase in health expenditure against a backdrop of falling GDP per capita.

Prevenção, detecção e assistência à deficiência em serviços de atenção primária à saúde do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil

Abstract The objective of this study was to assess the performance of primary health care (PHC) services for disability prevention, detection and assistance in the state of São Paulo. The study included 2739 health services, from 514 municipalities. 128 organizational quality indicators of the QualiAB instrument referring to the evaluative dimension “Attention to disability in primary health care services”. The association of health care performance score of each domain with independent variables, health assessment, and support network were tested using of multiple linear regression. The performance percentage was 61.6% for all domains, 73.6% for structure (inputs and human resources), 68.7% for qualification of prenatal care, 56.1% for qualification of child health care, 55.8% for prevention of disabilities related to chronic conditions, and 53.9% for attention to people with disabilities and caregivers. There was a significant association with variables related to the type of service and participation in service evaluations. PHC services still perform incipient actions for the prevention, surveillance and diagnosis of disabilities as well as for comprehensive care for people with disabilities.

Abstract P153: Disruptions to Diabetes and Hypertension Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Recovery Approaches in the Latin America and Caribbean Region

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare services in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). However, few studies provided comprehensive and quantitative data on the magnitude of this disruption. Objectives: To synthesize evidence on the extent of disruptions to diabetes and hypertension care in LAC during the COVID-19 pandemic and interventions to recover. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of published papers in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. We adopted the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) Framework to identify healthcare services susceptible to disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, specific to diabetes and hypertension, including recovery approaches. We synthesized study findings narratively to represent the diversity of findings geographically and health system. Results: Our search yielded 33,510 abstracts after de-duplication; following title/abstract screening and full-text review, 330 articles (218 on disruptions; 112 on interventions) were included in the synthesis. Although there was high heterogeneity, similarities in landscape of disruptions to primary care services across LAC exist. Of the PHCPI Framework domains, disruptions to workforce, medications and supplies, and patient-related outcomes were most recurrent. Intervention studies focused telehealth using digital strategies for diverse care areas and counseling support for health behaviors and mental health. There were data gaps within LAC regarding health system readiness and digital health effectiveness, adoption, efficiency, reach, and sustainability ( Figure ). Conclusions: This scoping review identified priorities for action within LAC: 1) establish and fund high-quality research and surveillance systems for hypertension and diabetes; 2) Optimally integrate digital health into hypertension and diabetes care; 3) implement mental health promotion strategies among healthcare workers; 4) establish optimal governance, leadership, and financing of healthcare systems.

Primary care providers’ preferences for pay-for-performance programs: a discrete choice experiment study in Shandong China

BackgroundPay-for-performance (P4P) schemes are commonly used to incentivize primary healthcare (PHC) providers to improve the quality of care they deliver. However, the effectiveness of P4P schemes can vary depending on their design. In this study, we aimed to investigate the preferences of PHC providers for participating in P4P programs in a city in Shandong province, China.MethodWe conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with 882 PHC providers, using six attributes: type of incentive, whom to incentivize, frequency of incentive, size of incentive, the domain of performance measurement, and release of performance results. Mixed logit models and latent class models were used for the statistical analyses.ResultsOur results showed that PHC providers had a strong negative preference for fines compared to bonuses (− 1.91; 95%CI − 2.13 to − 1.69) and for annual incentive payments compared to monthly (− 1.37; 95%CI − 1.59 to − 1.14). Providers also showed negative preferences for incentive size of 60% of monthly income, group incentives, and non-release of performance results. On the other hand, an incentive size of 20% of monthly income and including quality of care in performance measures were preferred. We identified four distinct classes of providers with different preferences for P4P schemes. Class 2 and Class 3 valued most of the attributes differently, while Class 1 and Class 4 had a relatively small influence from most attributes.ConclusionP4P schemes that offer bonuses rather than fines, monthly rather than annual payments, incentive size of 20% of monthly income, paid to individuals, including quality of care in performance measures, and release of performance results are likely to be more effective in improving PHC performance. Our findings also highlight the importance of considering preference heterogeneity when designing P4P schemes.

Strengthening primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: furthering structural changes in the post-pandemic era.

Strengthening primary health care (PHC) is the most cost-effective approach in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to achieve sustainable universal health coverage (UHC), protect against health shocks, and promote health and wellbeing for all people. It has been 45 years since PHC was put on the global agenda followed by multiple efforts to advocate for more funding and improved performance of PHC. Yet, investment in PHC is still insufficient and overall performance of PHC systems is weak in LMICs, resulting in increased vulnerability and poor health outcomes especially among marginalized populations. As countries recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, which exposed the fragility of PHC platforms, it is imperative to go beyond advocacy for PHC investments and make systemic changes to strengthen PHC as the foundation of resilient and equitable health systems. We propose five gamechangers to facilitate structural changes for strengthening PHC through a focused health systems approach: (i) integration of client-centered health services at PHC level; (ii) digitization of PHC services; (iii) efficiency gains invested in essential health services; (iv) strengthening management practices for PHC at district and facility levels; and (v) advancing community engagement for PHC. To be successful, the implementation of the gamechangers must be contextualized and focus on achieving sustainable health outcomes, and therefore use implementation approaches that link essential health services to health outcomes. Through this way countries will maximize the possibility of achieving UHC and attaining the ambitious health targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030.

Is it better to bring digital health tools together? Where Burkina Faso is going with a minimal digital ecosystem (MDE)

Abstract Digital health technologies are proliferating in low-income countries. However, they are not always optimally integrated and focused on health system priorities. To improve the performance of primary health care and accelerate progress toward universal health coverage, Burkina Faso aims to bring together eight digital health tools in two health districts as a pilot project, an initiative known as the ‘Minimal Digital Ecosystem’. A co-creation approach is used to develop and implement these tools, involving the Ministry of Health, international nongovernmental organizations that promote the tools, donors and researchers. Despite the many challenges in developing and deploying it, the minimal digital ecosystem (MDE) is a promising experiment that deserves special attention to reap its full benefits.

Family planning integration in Ethiopia’s primary health care system: a qualitative study on opportunities, challenges and best practices

BackgroundFamily planning (FP) service integration into primary health care (PHC) is an effective approach to realize reproductive autonomy, increase the use of contraceptives, and improve maternal and child health outcomes. The Ethiopian government promotes integration of FP services into primary health care (PHC). However, there is paucity of evidence on the status of FP service integration. The aim of this study is to explore the state of FP integration into PHC services and identify facilitators and barriers to integration.MethodsA qualitative study nested with a larger national study was conducted from July to October 2022. A total of 60 interviews were conducted with FP stakeholders including, government organizations, non-governmental organizations, donors, service providers, and clients. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded using OpenCode 4.03. The coded data were analyzed using framework analysis approach, using the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) framework. Direct quotes and results from the coding and categorization were used to develop the report.ResultsFamily planning is largely provided in designated units by dedicated staff within PHC facilities. The provision of integrated FP service within each service unit is in its early stage. Successful examples of integration include integration of FP with postnatal care, abortion care, and youth-friendly service centers. Facilitators of integration include commitment of the government and partners, the presence of policies and guidelines, and positive attitude of service providers and clients. However, integration of FP also faces challenges that are largely related to challenges of the FP program even before integration. These include resource shortage, health workers shortage, health workers’ capacity/skill gaps, misconceptions about FP, religious and socio-cultural norms, and lack of awareness.ConclusionsIntegration of FP with PHC services in the Ethiopian public health facilities is viable. Pre-existing challenges of the FP program continued to be barriers to integration. Expanding the experiences of good practices in the integration of FP with post abortion care, post-natal care, and youth-friendly service centers to other components of PHC warrants attention. Addressing both supply- and demand-side challenges of the FP program is needed to facilitate the integration of FP with other PHC services.

Pay for performance in Brazilian primary health care: quality of work processes, actions and services

PurposeIn 2011, Brazil introduced a national pay-for-performance (P4P) scheme called the National Program for Improving Primary Health Care Access and Quality (PMAQ), rolled out over three cycles and reaching more than 5,000 municipalities and 40,000 family health teams (FHTs). There is little evidence on how the PMAQ was implemented locally and whether this variation in implementation affects performance, particularly, in terms of work process indicators. This study compared different cases of municipal-level PMAQ implementation (bonuses paid or not to FHTs) over the last two program cycles to analyze the quality of the work processes, actions and services of FHTs.Design/methodology/approachThis was a cross-sectional analytical study using secondary data from an external evaluation of the Brazilian PMAQ. In total, 27,500 FHTs participated in the evaluation. They were divided into four clusters based on whether or not municipalities paid bonuses to workers during cycles 2 and 3 of the program (2013–2019). Variables regarding work processes, actions and services were classified as “Quality Assurance – QA” or “Continued Quality Improvement – CQI”, and an individual score was assigned based on the average score of each variable.FindingsThe four clusters displayed an increase in overall QA and CQI scores between the two program cycles; though this increase was small between the set of primary health care teams that received bonuses and those that did not.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to bridging the gap in the scientific literature for evaluative studies on the relationship between direct payment for performance to health professionals and better quality actions and services in low and middle-income countries.

Performing up to Nordic principles? Geographic and socioeconomic equity in ambulatory care sensitive conditions among older adults in capital areas of Denmark, Finland and Sweden in 2000–2015

BackgroundDenmark, Finland and Sweden pursue equity in health for their citizens through universal health care. However, it is unclear if these services reach the older adult population equally across different socioeconomic positions or living areas. Thus, we assessed geographic and socioeconomic equity in primary health care (PHC) performance among the older adults in the capital areas of Denmark (Copenhagen), Finland (Helsinki) and Sweden (Stockholm) in 2000–2015. Hospitalisations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were applied as a proxy for PHC performance.MethodsWe acquired individual level ACSCs for those aged ≥ 45 in 2000–2015 from national hospitalisation registers. To identify whether the disparities varied by age, we applied three age groups (those aged 45–64, 65–75 and ≥ 75). Socioeconomic disparities in ACSCs were described with incidence rate ratios (IRR) and annual rates by education, income and living-alone; and then analysed with biennial concentration indices by income. Geographic disparities were described with biennial ACSC rates by small areas and analysed with two-level Poisson multilevel models. These models provided small area estimates of IRRs of ACSCs in 2000 and their slopes for development over time, between which Pearson correlations were calculated within each capital area. Finally, these models were adjusted for income to distinguish between geographic and socioeconomic disparities.ResultsCopenhagen had the highest IRR of ACSCs among those aged 45–64, and Helsinki among those aged ≥ 75. Over time IRRs decreased among those aged ≥ 45, but only in Helsinki among those aged ≥ 75. All concentration indices slightly favoured the affluent population but in Stockholm were mainly non-significant. Among those aged ≥ 75, Pearson correlations were low in Copenhagen (-0.14; p = 0.424) but high in both Helsinki (-0.74; < 0.001) and Stockholm (-0.62; < 0.001) – with only little change when adjusted for income. Among those aged ≥ 45 the respective correlations were rather similar, except for a strong correlation in Copenhagen (-0.51, 0.001) after income adjustment.ConclusionsWhile socioeconomic disparities in PHC performance persisted among older adults in the three Nordic capital areas, geographic disparities narrowed in both Helsinki and Stockholm but persisted in Copenhagen. Our findings suggest that the Danish PHC incorporated the negative effects of socio-economic segregation to a lesser degree.