Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Research Articles

Limited preoperative forward flexion does not impact outcomes between anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis

BackgroundAnatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains the treatment of choice for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff (PGHOA). However, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has gained popularity as a primary procedure in selected patients who may be at risk for postoperative rotator cuff dysfunction or glenoid loosening. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes between TSA and RSA in patients with PGHOA and limited preoperative forward flexion (FF). MethodsA retrospective review was performed on a multi-institutional registry of patients to identify patients aged less than 80 years undergoing TSA or RSA for PGHOA with preoperative FF ≤ 90°. Forty-five TSAs were identified and matched by age and sex to 45 patients undergoing RSA. A subset of 22 TSAs and 24 RSAs with severely limited preoperative FF of ≤ 70° was also analyzed. Range of motion including FF, external rotation and internal rotation, strength, and patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale pain score, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index score, Veterans RAND 12 mental score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Constant-Murley score were evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperative. ResultsNo significant differences were observed in postoperative FF, external rotation, or strength measurements between groups. The limited FF TSA group achieved significantly improved internal rotation compared to the RSA group (L2 vs. L4, P < .002). No significant differences were observed between TSA and RSA in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, Constant, or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (P > .05) for both the overall comparison and subset of patients with FF of ≤ 70°. However, patients in the RSA cohort showed a significantly higher return to normal sporting activities than the TSA group. ConclusionPatients aged less than 80 years with PGHOA and limited preoperative FF achieve similar postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes whether treated with TSA or RSA. Therefore, limited preoperative FF does not appear to be a major determinant of outcomes for PGHOA.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis With Intact Rotator Cuffs: A Meta-Analyses.

Traditional practice favors total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHO) with an intact rotator cuff; however, the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded to include PGHO. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the mean differences in the range of motion and patient-reported outcomes between the TSA and RSA with an intact rotator cuff and to analyze the subgroup of the Walch type B2 glenoid. This IRB-exempt, PROSPERO-registered systematic review strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A literature search of five databases revealed 493 articles, of which 10 were included for quantitative synthesis. Level III evidence studies with the diagnosis of PGHO and ≥2 years of follow-up were included. Studies without preoperative and postoperative data were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes were collected. The random-effects model was employed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There were a total of 544 and 329 studies in the TSA group and RSA group, respectively. The mean age in the TSA group and RSA groups were 65.36 ± 7.06 and 73.12 ± 2.40, respectively (p = 0.008). The percentages of males in the TSA and RSA groups were 73.2% and 51.1%, respectively (p = 0.02). The mean differences in forward elevation, external rotation in adduction, internal rotation scale, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single AssessmentNumericEvaluation (SANE) scores were improved for both groups with no significant differences between the two. There were 9.6 times the revisions in the TSA group (8.8% vs. 0.91%; p = 0.014) and 1.5 times the complications in the TSA group (3.68% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0096). Two hundred and forty-two glenoids were identified as Walch type B2 (126 in the TSA groupand 116 in the RSA group). The mean ages in the B2 subgroup were 68.20 ± 3.25 and 73.03 ± 1.49 for the TSA and RSA, respectively (p = 0.25). The percentages of males in the B2 subgroup were 74.6% and 46.5% for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively (p = 0.0003). The ASES, SANE, forward elevation, and external rotation in the adduction results were descriptively summarized for this subgroup, with average mean differences of 49.0 and 51.2, 45.7 and 66.1, 77.6° and 58.6°, and 38.6° and 34.1° for the TSA and RSA groups, respectively. In the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff, the RSA has a similar range of motion and clinical outcomesbut lower complication and revision rates as compared to the TSA. This may hold true in the setting of the B2 glenoid, although a high-powered study on this subgroup is required. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty maintains an important role in select patients. Further studies are required to better elucidate the role of glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral head subluxation with regard to implant choice.

Three-dimensional scapular orientation: a comparison of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and cuff tear arthropathy to the unaffected shoulder

BackgroundScapular orientation may play an important role in preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty; however, there is currently no defined method for producing standardized three-dimensional measurements. The purpose of this study is to develop a reproducible measurement system of scapular orientation and to evaluate differences between unaffected shoulders and those with diagnoses of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and rotator cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). MethodsPatients receiving computed tomography scans for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning were enrolled prospectively. Thin sliced axial images that included bilateral shoulders and the thorax were reformatted. The pathology of the bilateral glenohumeral joints was defined as GHOA, CTA, or unaffected. Scapular orientation was defined relative to the thorax using three-dimensional models to define the protraction, rotation, and tilt angles in the supine position. Univariate analysis was performed to compare demographics and scapular measurements between patients with GHOA, CTA, and unaffected shoulder pathology. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of scapular orientation. ResultsOne hundred fifty-eight shoulders, comprising 79 patients were included. Twenty-seven percent (n = 21/79) of patients had an unaffected contralateral shoulder. Shoulders with GHOA had significantly greater downward scapular rotation (-14 ± 7 degrees) than both unaffected shoulders (-8 ± 7 degrees; P < .001) and those with CTA (-7 ± 8 degrees; P < .001). Increased downward scapular rotation was predicted by a shoulder pathology of GHOA in multivariate analysis (beta -7.09; P < .001). The magnitude of side-to-side difference was greatest in scapular rotation for patients with GHOA compared to CTA, with no significant differences in tilt or protraction. ConclusionScapular rotation in the supine position varies by shoulder pathology, with greater downward rotation seen in patients with primary GHOA. These findings underscore the need for awareness of scapular orientation in addition to glenoid morphology when evaluating and planning shoulder arthroplasty cases.

How anatomic should anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty be? Evaluation of humeral head reconstruction with the best-fit circle

IntroductionHumeral implant designs for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) focus on anatomic reconstruction of the articular segment. Likewise, the pathoanatomy of advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) often results in humeral head deformity. We hypothesized the anatomic reconstruction of the humeral head in aTSA risks overstuffing the glenohumeral joint. Methods97 cases (52 females) of primary GHOA in patients treated with aTSA were evaluated. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were used to classify glenoid morphology according to the Walch classification. Coronal plane images in the plane of the humerus were used to determine the anatomic perfect circle as described by Youderian et al. Humeral head thinning was determined as the distance from the center of rotation (COR) of the perfect circle to the nearest point along the humeral articular surface. aTSA was modeled with a predicted anatomic humeral head and a simulated 4 mm polyethylene glenoid component. The change in the position of the native humerus was determined. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used to evaluate differences in humeral head thinning and humeral lateralization between monoconcave and biconcave glenoid morphologies. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between humeral head thinning with preoperative active forward elevation and external rotation. ResultsThe mean radius of the perfect circle was 25.0±2.1 mm. There was a mean thinning of 2.4±2.0 mm (Range -1.7–8.3). Mean percent thinning of the humeral head was 9.4%±7.7%. The mean humeral lateralization was 6.4±2.0 mm. Humeral head thinning was not significantly associated with active forward elevation (r=-0.15, p=0.14) or active external rotation (r= -0.12, p=0.25). There were no significant differences in the percentage of humeral head thinning (p=0.324) or humeral lateralization (p=0.350) between concentric and eccentric glenoid wear patterns ConclusionsUtilization of the perfect circle as a guide in aTSA may risk excessive lateralization of the humerus and overstuffing the glenohumeral joint. This may have implications for subscapularis repair and healing, as well as glenoid implant and rotator cuff longevity. These findings call into question whether recreation of normal glenohumeral anatomy in aTSA is appropriate for all patients. Humeral head reconstruction in aTSA should account for glenohumeral joint volume and soft tissue contracture.

Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Primary gleno-humeral osteoarthritis is associated with both excessive posterior humeral subluxation (PHS) and excessive glenoid retroversion in 40% of cases. These morphometric abnormalities are a particular issue since they may be responsible for a deterioration in long term clinical and radiological outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a CT-analysis of patients who underwent Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with B2-, B3- or C-type glenoids in whom an attempt was made to correct for excessive glenoid retroversion and excessive posterior humeral subluxation intraoperatively. We performed a retrospective, single-center study including 62 TSA patients with a pre-operative PHS of the glenohumeral joint (31 men, 31 women, 70±9 years) between January 2000 and January 2014. Glenoids were classified as B2 (32 cases), B3 (13 cases) or C (17 cases). Glenoid retroversion was corrected by anterior asymmetric reaming. Patients were reviewed for clinical and CT-scan assessment with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years (minimum 5 years). At final follow-up the CT-images were reconstructed in a scapular plan. A PHS index of >65% defined persistence. The revision free rate was estimated at 93%. Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively (ρ=0.58) and strong at final follow-up (ρ=0.73). Postoperative CT-scans on average showed a surgical correction of PHS compared to preoperatively (79% vs 65% respectively, p<0.05) and retroversion (20° vs 10° respectively, p<0.05). At final follow-up, 25/62 patients had a persistence in 2D model and 41/62 in 2D corrected model. Persistence of PHS had no influence on clinical outcomes but did demonstrate a significantly higher glenoid loosening rate (20% vs 59%, p<0.05). Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively and strengthened at long-term follow up. Anterior asymmetric reaming allowed for a surgical improvement of both PHS and retroversion, but it was not sufficient to maintain a correction over time. Glenoid loosening was more frequent in case of PHS persistence but seemingly without clinical relevance.

Total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: does posterior humeral subluxation persist after correction of the glenoid version at 5 years minimum?

Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is associated with both excessive posterior humeral subluxation (PHS) and excessive glenoid retroversion in 40% of cases. These morphometric abnormalities are a particular issue because they may be responsible for a deterioration in long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to perform a computed tomographic (CT) analysis of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with B2-, B3-, or C-type glenoids in whom an attempt was made to correct for excessive glenoid retroversion and excessive posterior humeral subluxation intraoperatively. We performed a retrospective, single-center study including 62 TSA patients with a preoperative PHS of the glenohumeral joint (31 men, 31 women, 70±9 years) between January 2000 and January 2014. Glenoids were classified as B2 (32 cases), B3 (13 cases), or C (17 cases). Glenoid retroversion was corrected by anterior asymmetric reaming. Patients were reviewed for clinical and CT scan assessment with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years (minimum 5 years). At final follow-up, the CT images were reconstructed in the scapular plane. A PHS index >65% defined persistence. The revision-free rate was estimated at 93%. Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively (ρ=0.58) and strong at final follow-up (ρ=0.73). Postoperative CT scans on average showed a surgical correction of PHS compared to preoperatively (79% vs. 65% respectively, P<.05) and retroversion (20° vs. 10° respectively, P<.05). At final follow-up, 25 of 62 patients had a persistence in the 2-dimensional (2D) model and 41 of 62 in the corrected 2D model. Persistence of PHS had no influence on clinical outcomes but did demonstrate a significantly higher glenoid loosening rate (20% vs. 59%, P<.05). Correlation between PHS and retroversion was moderate preoperatively and strengthened at long-term follow-up. Anterior asymmetric reaming allowed for a surgical improvement of both PHS and retroversion, but it was not sufficient to maintain a correction over time. Glenoid loosening was more frequent in case of PHS persistence but seemingly without clinical relevance.

External Rotation Strength After TSA in Osteoarthritic Shoulders with Eccentric Deformity Is Not Impacted by Posterior Rotator Cuff Deficiency.

Patients with persistent glenohumeral osteoarthritis symptoms despite nonoperative management may pursue anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). TSA revision rates are higher in patients with preoperative eccentric (asymmetric posterior erosion) compared with concentric (symmetric) glenoid deformity. If posterior rotator cuff deficiency demonstrated preoperatively in patients with eccentric deformity persists after TSA, it may manifest as relative weakness in external compared with internal rotation secondary to deficient activity of the shoulder external rotator muscles. Persistent posterior rotator cuff deficiency is hypothesized to contribute to TSA failures. However, it remains unknown whether rotational strength is impaired after TSA in patients with eccentric deformity. Our goal was to determine if patients with eccentric deformity exhibit relative external rotation weakness that may be explained by posterior rotator cuff deficiency after TSA. Patients who were >1 year after TSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and had had preoperative eccentric or concentric deformity were prospectively recruited. Torque was measured and electromyography was performed during maximal isometric contractions in 26 three-dimensional direction combinations. Relative strength in opposing directions (strength balance) and muscle activity of 6 shoulder rotators were compared between groups. The internal (+) and external (-) rotation component of strength balance did not differ in patients with eccentric (mean internal-external rotation component of strength balance: -7.6% ± 7.4%) compared with concentric deformity (-10.3% ± 6.8%) (mean difference: 2.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.3% to 6.7%]; p = 0.59), suggesting no relative external rotation weakness. Infraspinatus activity was reduced in patients with eccentric (43.9% ± 10.4% of maximum voluntary contraction [MVC]) compared with concentric (51.3% ± 10.4% of MVC) deformity (mean difference: -7.4% [95% CI, -13.4% to -1.4%] of MVC; p = 0.04). A relative external rotation strength deficit following TSA was not found, despite evidence of reduced infraspinatus activity, in the eccentric-deformity group. Reduced infraspinatus activity suggests that posterior rotator cuff deficiencies may persist following TSA in patients with eccentric deformities. Longitudinal study is necessary to evaluate muscle imbalance as a contributor to higher TSA failure rates. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA REVIEW OF PRIMARY REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY AT A SINGLE TERTIARY ACADEMIC HOSPITAL IN SOUTH AFRICA: A FOUR-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW

Reverse Total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) was initially introduced to treat rotator cuff arthropathy. With proven successful long-term outcomes, it has gained a noteworthy surge in popularity with its indications consequently being extended to treating various traumatic glenohumeral diseases.Several countries holding national registries remain a guide to the use the prosthesis, however a notable lack of epidemiological data still exists. More so in South Africa where the spectrum of joint disease related to communicable diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis may influence indications and patient demographics. By analysing the epidemiology of patients who underwent RTSA at our institution, we aimed to outline the local disease spectrum, the patients afflicted and indications for surgery.A retrospective review of all patients operated within the sports unit between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022 was conducted. An analysis of the epidemiological data pertaining to patient demographics, diagnosis, indications for surgery and complications were recorded.Included in the review were 58 patients who underwent primary RTSA over the 4-year period. There were 41 females and 17 male patients, age &lt;55 years (n= 14) &gt;55 years (n=44). The indications included 23 rotator cuff arthropathy (40%), 12 primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) (20%), 10 avascular necrosis (AVN) humeral head (17%), 7 inflammatory OA (12%), 4 chronic shoulder dislocation (7%) and 2 sequalae of proximal humerus fractures (4%).The study revealed RTSA being performed in patients older than 55 years of age, the main pathologies included rotator cuff arthropathy and primary OA, however AVN and shoulder dislocations secondary to trauma contributed significantly to the total tally of surgeries undertaken. This highlights the disease burden of developing countries contributing to patients presenting for RTSA

Incongruity of the scapulohumeral arch: an indirect sign of posterior subluxation of the humeral head in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

In symptomatic glenohumeral osteoarthritis, arthroplasty is the gold standard to restore a mobile and painless shoulder. The kind of arthroplasty chosen is based mainly on the evaluation of the rotator cuff and the type of glenoid. The aim of this study was to analyze the scapulohumeral arch in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (PGHOA) with a non-injured cuff and to determine whether posterior humeral subluxation influences Moloney's line, which corresponds to an intact scapulohumeral arch. Between 2017 and 2020, 58 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties were implanted in the same center. We included all patients with complete preoperative imaging (X-rays and MRI or arthro-CT scan) assessing an intact rotator cuff. A total of 55 shoulders that had undergone surgery for a total anatomical shoulder prosthesis were analyzed after determining the type of glenoid in the frontal plane according to the Favard classification on an anteroposterior X-ray and in the axial plane according to the Walch classification on CT scan. The grade of osteoarthritis was evaluated according to Samilson. We analyzed whether there was a rupture of Moloney's line on the frontal radiograph and assessed the acromiohumeral distance. After preoperative analysis of 55 shoulders, 24 shoulders had a type A glenoid and 31 a type B glenoid. Twenty-two shoulders had a scapulohumeral arch rupture and 31 had a posterior subluxation of the humeral head: 25 shoulders had a type B1 glenoid and 6 had a type B2 glenoid according to the Walch classification. Most glenoids were E0 (n=47, 85%). The incongruity of Moloney's line was more frequent with type B than A glenoids (20/31, 65%, vs 2/24, 8%, p<0.001). No patient (0/15) with a type A1 glenoid had rupture of Moloney's line, and only two patients (2/9) with a type A2 glenoid had incongruency of the scapulohumeral arch. In PGHOA, the rupture of the scapulohumeral arch seen in anteroposterior X-rays, also known as Moloney's line, may be an indirect sign of posterior humeral subluxation, corresponding to a type B glenoid in the Walch classification. Incongruity of Moloney's line may indicate a rotator cuff injury or posterior glenohumeral subluxation with an intact cuff in PGHOA.

Similar rates of revision surgery following primary anatomic compared to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients ≥70 years old with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A cohort study of 3,791 patients.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), initially indicated for cuff tear arthropathy, is increasingly used for elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and an intact rotator cuff. This is often done to avoid revision surgery in elderly patients for rotator cuff failure with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) despite traditionally good outcomes of TSA. We sought to determine whether there was a difference in outcomes for patients ≥70 years who receive RTSA compared to TSA for GHOA. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a US integrated health care system's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. Patients ≥70 years who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty for GHOA with an intact rotator cuff were included (2012-2021). RTSA was compared to TSA. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate all-cause revision risk during follow-up, while multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate 90-day emergency department (ED) visit, and 90-day readmission. The final study sample comprised 685 RTSA and 3,106 TSA. Mean age was 75.8 years (standard deviation 4.6) and 43.4% were male. After accounting for confounders, no significant difference in all-cause revision risk was observed for RTSA compared to TSA (hazard ratio=0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.39-1.58). The most common reason for revision following RTSA was glenoid component loosening (40.0%). Over half (54.0%) of revisions following TSA were for rotator cuff tear. No difference between procedure type was observed in likelihood for 90-day ED visits (odds ratio [OR]=0.94, 95% CI=0.71-1.26) and 90-day readmission (OR=1.32, 95% CI=0.83-2.09). RTSA and TSA for GHOA with an intact rotator cuff in patients ≥70 years had a similar revision risk, as well as likelihood for 90-day ED visits and readmissions. While revision risk was similar, the most common causes for revision were different with rotator cuff tears for TSA and glenoid component loosening for RTSA.

Glenoid-based reference system to differentiate shoulder pathologies on plain radiographs

Shoulder radiographs are utilized for evaluation and the planning of treatment of various pathologies. Making a diagnosis of these pathologies on plain radiographs occurs by recognizing the relationship of the humeral head on the registry of the glenoid. Quantification of these changes in registry does not currently exist. We hypothesize that a geometric relationship of the humeral head and the glenoid exists that is defined on an anteroposterior Grashey view radiograph by the relationship of the best-fit circle of the humeral head relative to the best-fit circle of the glenoid such that relative measurements will define the normal shoulder and the pathologic shoulder. One hundred fifty-six shoulders were included: 53 normal shoulders, 51 with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), and 52 with cuff-tear arthropathy (CTA). Humeral head best-fit circle was utilized to define the Circle of the Humeral Head (cHH). A glenoid best-fit circle (cG) was defined by the following rules: (1) best-fit of the glenoid articular surface, (2) defined by the acromion such that it either (a) reaches maximal interaction with the inferior surface of the acromion, or (b) the perimeter of the circle is at the lateral-most point of the acromion. The relationship between cHH and cG is defined by measurement of cHH in horizontal and vertical planes relative to the glenoid circle reference. The Horizontal Displacement Angle (HDA) measures the horizontal position of cHH relative to cG, representing degree of medialization towards the glenoid. The Vertical Displacement Angle (VDA) measures the vertical position of cHH relative to cG, representing degree of superiorization towards the acromion. Angles were compared by diagnosis and sex. The average HDA was 61.0 (60.3-61.7, 95% CI) degrees in normal shoulders, 79.9 (76.9-82.9, 95% CI) degrees in GHOA, and 63.4 (61.7-65.1, 95% CI) degree in CTA (p < 0.001). The average VDA was 43.1 (42.2-44.0, 95% CI) degrees in normal shoulders, 40.9 (39.9-42.0, 95% CI) degrees in GHOA, and 59.7 (57.6-61.7, 95% CI) degrees in CTA (p < 0.001). Interobserver reliability was 0.991 (0.94-1.0, 95% CI) and intraobserver reliability was 0.998 (0.99-1.0, 95% CI). The geometric relationship of cHH to the Glenoid Circle reference was plotted for each group. A geometric relationship exists of the humeral head in reference to the glenoid circle. Together, the Horizontal Displacement Angle and the Vertical Displacement Angle distinguish between a normal shoulder, GHOA, and CTA. This suggests that this novel methodology may provide a preoperative planning tool that is easily accessible.

Minimum 10-year follow-up of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and ream-and-run arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Reports on long term outcomes and failures of shoulder arthroplasty are uncommon. The purpose of this study is to present minimum 10-year outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing ream-and-run and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary glenohumeral arthritis. This study analyzed consecutive patients that had undergone a ream-and-run or TSA with minimum 10-year follow-up. Pain scores and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) values were obtained preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively via e-mail or mail-in response. Percentage of maximum possible improvement (%MPI) was also calculated. Of 127 eligible patients, 63 (50%) responded to a 10-year survey. This included 34 patients undergoing ream-and-run arthroplasty and 29 patients undergoing TSA. The ream-and-run patients were significantly younger than the TSA patients (60 ± 7 vs 68 ± 8, p<0.001), predominantly male (97% vs 41%, p<0.001), and had a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.018). In the ream-and run group, the mean pain score improved from a preoperative value of 6.5 ± 1.9 to 0.9 ± 1.3 (p < 0.001), and the mean SST score improved from 5.4 ± 2.4 to 10.3 ± 2.1 at 10-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Twenty-eight (82%) achieved an SST improvement above the MCID of 2.6. Four patients (12%) underwent single-stage exchange to another hemiarthroplasty, while 1 (3%) required manipulation under anesthesia. In the TSA group, the pain score improved from a preoperative value of 6.6 ± 2.2 to 1.2 ± 2.3 (p < 0.001), and the SST score improved from 3.8 ± 2.6 to 8.9 ± 2.6 at 10-year follow-up. (p < 0.001). Of the 29 patients who underwent a TSA, 27 (93%) achieved an SST improvement above the MCID of 1.6. No patient in the TSA group required reoperation. While the characteristics of the patients differ between the two groups, excellent functional results can be obtained with the ream-and-run arthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: significantly different characteristics and outcomes in shoulders with intact vs. torn rotator cuff

To compare outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with and without rotator cuff (RC) tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears. We reviewed records of all patients who received RSA for primary OA or secondary OA. All patients had preoperative radiographs, computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their shoulders to assess their etiology, glenoid morphology, and fatty infiltration. Pre- and postoperative (at minimum follow-up of 2 years) Constant scores and range of motion were compared between patients who had RSA for primary OA with and without RC tears to those with secondary OA due to RC tears. Of the initial cohort of 605 shoulders (583 patients), 153 were lost to follow-up (25.3%), 25 required revision with implant removal (4.1%), and 13 died of causes unrelated to the surgery (2.1%), and left a final cohort of 414 patients. Of the final cohort, 97 had primary OA with intact RC, 62 had primary OA with RC tears, and 255 had secondary OA. Postoperative Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC (73.8±14.3), compared with both primary OA with RC tears (66.1±14.6, P<.001) and secondary OA (64.1±14.8, P<.001). There were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores between primary OA with RC tears and secondary OA. At 2 or more years following RSA, Constant scores were significantly higher for primary OA with intact RC, compared to either primary OA with RC tears or secondary OA, whereas there were no differences in pre- or postoperative scores of shoulders that had primary OA with RC tears vs. secondary OA. The authors recommend distinguishing primary OA with intact RC from primary OA with RC tears, as the two have considerably different characteristics and prognosis following RSA.

Outcomes of patients undergoing anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty with augmented glenoid components – a systematic review

Background Glenoid loosening is an issue in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (a-TSA). This has been attributed to abnormal glenoid anatomy, common among these patients. Different alternatives have been proposed to tackle glenoid bone loss and restore joint alignment with augmented glenoid implants being increasingly used to deal with this problem. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing augmented glenoid a-TSAs. Our hypothesis was that augmented glenoid components will lead to good patient outcomes with a low incidence of complications and revision procedures. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINHAL were searched from inception to February 2022 for information pertaining to outcomes of patients undergoing a-TSA with augmented glenoid implants. Results Eighteen studies reported on outcomes of 814 a-TSA (800 participants) with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. Most studies (67%) were Type IV level of evidence. Almost 70% of participants underwent an a-TSA secondary to primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Most glenoids were type B2 (73%). Augmented glenoids material was mostly all-polyethylene (81%) with full wedge (45%) and stepped components (38%) designs being the most common. Most studies reported good clinical outcomes. 17 patients (4%) underwent a revision surgery. Conclusions Our review found that patients undergoing a-TSA with augmented glenoid components report good outcomes at short-to-mid-term follow-up. Further research is warranted to determine if such outcomes remain similar in long term. Level of evidence Level III, Systematic Review of Therapeutic Studies.

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in Walch type C glenoid deformity: mid- to long-term outcomes.

Hypoplastic glenoid morphology in the setting of glenohumeral osteoarthritis is a rare yet complex surgical problem. Treatment of this patient population with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) remains controversial. Furthermore, there is no gold-standard approach, with limited guidance for surgeons on the need for glenoid version correction in the setting of a dysplastic glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid- to long-term outcomes and reoperation rates of aTSA for the treatment of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with Walch type C glenoid deformity. This observational, retrospective cohort study identified patients with a Walch type C glenoid who underwent aTSA at 2 institutions between 2007 and 2016. Patients were contacted to complete updated patient-reported outcome measures at a minimum of 5.5 years postoperatively. The outcome measures collected included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score. Secondary outcomes included any additional surgical procedures on the operative shoulder, patient satisfaction, and willingness to undergo aTSA again. In total, 30 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 26 (86.7%) were able to be contacted to undergo final outcome evaluations. The mean age at the time of surgery was 61.3 years (range, 40.9-75.5 years), and 20 patients (76.9%) were men. The mean follow-up period was 8.5 years (range, 5.5-11.3 years) after surgery. Treatment was performed with an augmented component in 9 patients and with a standard component in 17. Of the 17 patients with non-augmented components, 9 underwent partial correction with asymmetrical reaming, 3 received a mini-inset glenoid component, and 2 had an anteriorly offset humeral component. At final follow-up, patients had a mean ASES score of 83.6 ± 16.7, ASES pain score of 24.7 ± 20.8, SANE score of 80.4 ± 20.9, and patient satisfaction rate of 84.1%. No statistically significant differences in any outcome measure were observed between patients with augmented glenoid components and those with non-augmented glenoid components. One revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed for instability at 7 years postoperatively after a traumatic dislocation. All patients reported that they would be willing to undergo the same surgical procedure again. Despite variance in glenoid reconstructive approach, aTSA provides satisfactory and sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with glenoid dysplasia and primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with a low revision rate at a mean of 8.5 years. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty should remain a surgical option in patients with Walch type C glenoid deformity.

Factors Impacting Time to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Among Patients with Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis and Rotator Cuff Arthropathy Managed Conservatively with Corticosteroid Injections

Factors Impacting Time to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Among Patients with Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis and Rotator Cuff Arthropathy Managed Conservatively with Corticosteroid Injections

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with a B2 Glenoid Addressed with Corrective Reaming: Mean 8-year Follow-up.

The management of Walch B2 glenoid deformities in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis is frequently debated. Previous literature has shown that the treatment of B2 glenoids with high-side reaming and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) perform well in the short-term, but is associated with an increased glenoid component failure rate in severe deformities. Therefore, many have explored alternative options, including augmented anatomic glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our goal in this study is to provide mid-term radiographic and clinical outcomes after high-side reaming and anatomic TSA for B2 glenoids. Patients were followed both clinically and radiographically. Preoperative CT scans were used for retrospective analysis of deformity. Both preoperative and postoperative VAS pain, ASES score, and SST scores were collected. Radiographs were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively for humeral head decentering relative to the glenoid vault, immediate glenoid seating, and final glenoid peg radiolucency. Of the original cohort of 59 patients (6 now deceased) reported at a mean radiographic follow-up of 3.4 years, 34 shoulders in 33 patients with B2 glenoids (mean retroversion 18.9°, range 4°-32°) were available for follow-up at a mean of 8.6 years (range 5.5-11.2) after high-side glenoid reaming with anatomic TSA. Three (5.1%) of the original 59 shoulder were revised. At final follow-up, 3 of 30 (10.0%) shoulders had radiographic glenoid component failure, but were unrevised. Glenoid component failure was associated with worse initial glenoid component seating (mean Lazarus score 1.2 vs. 2.0, p=0.002). Glenoid failure was also associated with increased posterior humeral head subluxation at 2-4 year follow-up (mean 5.6% vs 12.6%, p=0.045) and at final follow-up (mean 7.0% vs. 21%, p=0.002). There was no association between glenoid component failure and preoperative retroversion, inclination, or humeral head subluxation (all p>0.05). Glenoid component failure was associated with worse ASES (88 vs. 73) and VAS pain (0.8 vs. 2.1) scores (both p=0.03). At a mean of 8.6 years, 88% of shoulders available for follow-up had well-fixed glenoid components. Glenoid component failure was associated with poor initial glenoid component seating, with failed components having an average of 25% of the glenoid component not seated. Preoperative deformity such as glenoid retroversion, inclination, or humeral head subluxation did not predict glenoid component failure. This study supports that initial glenoid component seating and recurrence of posterior humeral head subluxation may be the most important factors for mid-term glenoid component survival in anatomic TSA in patients with B2 glenoids.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with preservation of the rotator cuff for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis has similar outcomes to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff arthropathy.

Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have expanded to include individuals with intact rotator cuffs such as patients with severe glenoid deformity or with concern of future rotator cuff insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of RSA with an intact rotator cuff to RSA for cuff arthropathy and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesized that outcomes of RSA with an intact rotator cuff would be comparable to RSA for cuff arthropathy and TSA but with diminished range of motion (ROM) compared with TSA. Patients at one institution who underwent RSA and TSA between 2015 and 2020 with minimum 12-month follow-up were identified. RSA with preservation of the rotator cuff (+rcRSA) was compared to RSA for cuff arthropathy (-rcRSA) and anatomic TSA (TSA). Demographics and glenoid version/inclination were obtained. Pre- and postoperative ROM; patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores; and complications were obtained. Twenty-four patients underwent+rcRSA, 69 underwent -rcRSA, and 93 underwent TSA. There were more women in the +rcRSA cohort (75.8%) than in the -rcRSA (37.7%, P=.001) and TSA (37.6%, P=.001) cohorts. Mean age of the +rcRSA cohort (71.1) was greater than that of TSA (66.0, P=.021) but similar to that of -rcRSA (72.4, P=.237). Glenoid retroversion was greater in +rcRSA (18.2°) compared with -rcRSA (10.5°, P=.011) but was similar to TSA (14.7°; P=.244). Postoperatively, there were no differences in VAS or ASES between+rcRSA vs. -rcRSA and +rcRSA vs. TSA. SSV was lower in +rcRSA (83.9) compared with -rcRSA (91.8, P=.021), but was similar to TSA (90.5, P=.073). Similar ROM was achieved in forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation at final follow-up between+rcRSA and -rcRSA, but TSA had greater external rotation (44° vs. 38°, P=.041) and internal rotation (6.5° vs. 5.0°, P=.001) compared with+rcRSA. There were no differences in complication rates. At short-term follow-up, preservation of the rotator cuff in RSA demonstrated similarly excellent outcomes and low complication rates compared with RSA with a deficient rotator cuff and TSA, except for slightly lower internal and external rotation compared with TSA. Although multiple factors deserve consideration when choosing between RSA and TSA, RSA with preservation of the posterosuperior cuff is a viable treatment option for glenohumeral osteoarthritis, particularly in patients with severe glenoid deformity or those at risk for future rotator cuff insufficiency.

Accuracy and Reliability of Computerized Surgical Planning Software in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the concordance between preoperatively determined implant parameters using CT-based planning software and surgically implanted prostheses. Secondarily, we sought to evaluate the agreement between preoperative plans performed by surgeons at different levels of training. Patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and had a preoperative CT scan according to Blueprint (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) protocol to be used for preoperative planning were included. A cohort of short-stemmed (SS) and stemless cases performed between October 2017 and December 2018 was randomly selected from an institutional database for the study. Planning was performed separately by four observers at different levels of orthopedic training at a minimum of six months following the actual surgery. Concordance between the surgical decisions during planning and the actually utilized implants was calculated. Additionally, inter-rater agreement was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Implant parameters assessed were glenoid size, backside radius of curvature, and the need for posterior augment, in addition to humeral stem/nucleus size, head size, head height, and head eccentricity. Twenty-one patients were included (10 stemmed and 11 stemless) with a cohort comprising 12 (57%) females with a median age of 62 years (IQR 59.5,67). There was a total of 544 decision possibilities based on the above parameters. The total number of decisions that matched surgical data was 333 (61.2%). Prediction of glenoid component augmentation need and size was the variable that matched most with surgical data (83.3%), whereas nucleus/stem size was the worst (42.9%). Interobserver agreement was excellent in one variable, good in three variables, moderate in one, and poor in two. The best interobserver agreement was with regard to head height. Preoperative planning using CT-based software may be more accurate for the glenoid component when compared to humeral-sided parameters. Specifically, planning may be most helpful in determining the need and the size of glenoid component augmentation. Utilizing computerized software demonstrates high reliability, even among surgeons early in their orthopedic training.

Hemiarthroplasty versus total shoulder arthroplasty in B2 glenoids with an intact rotator cuff: a long-term matched cohort analysis

Walch B2 glenoids present unique challenges to the shoulder arthroplasty surgeon, particularly in young, active patients who may wish to avoid the restrictions typically associated with an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Long-term data are limited when comparing hemiarthroplasty (HA) and TSA for patients with an intact rotator cuff. The purpose of our study was to compare the long-term outcomes of HA vs. TSA in a matched analysis of patients with B2 glenoids, primary osteoarthritis (OA), and an intact rotator cuff. A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent HA or TSA between January 2000 and December 2011 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were primary OA, Walch B2 glenoid morphology, an intact rotator cuff intraoperatively, at least 2 years of clinical follow-up, or revision within 2 years of surgery. Fifteen HAs met inclusion criteria and were matched 1:2 with 30 TSAs using age, sex, body mass index, and implant selection. Clinical outcomes including range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, subjective shoulder value score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, complications, and revisions were recorded. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for stem loosening, humeral head subluxation, glenoid loosening, and glenoid erosion. A total of 15 HAs and 30 TSAs met inclusion criteria at a mean follow-up of 9.3 years. The mean age at the time of surgery was 60.2 years for HA and 65.4 years for TSA (P= .08). Both cohorts had significant improvements in ROM, subjective shoulder value, and VAS pain scores (P < .001). TSA had higher postoperative ASES scores compared to HA (P= .03) and lower postoperative VAS pain scores (P= .03), although the decrease in pain from preoperatively to final follow-up was not significantly different between HA and TSA (P= .11). HAs were more likely to have posterior humeral subluxation (P < .001) and stem lucencies (P= .02). Revisions occurred in 11.1% of the cohort with no difference for HA and TSA (P= .73). At nearly 10 years of follow-up, HA and TSA both showed significant improvements in ROM and pain when performed for primary glenohumeral OA in B2 glenoids with intact rotator cuffs. Compared to HA, TSAs had less posterior humeral subluxation, less stem lucencies, higher ASES scores, and lower postoperative VAS pain scores. However, our study failed to demonstrate a difference in ROM, complication, or revision rates between HA and TSA.