Primary Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Research Articles

Clinical outcomes of functional endoscopic sinus surgery in cystic fibrosis patients - a single centre experience.

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is an established surgical option for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with chronic rhinosinusitis that is refractory to conventional medical management. Objective and subjective evidence of benefit of ESS in this cohort of patients is currently conflicting in the literature. A single center retrospective study was undertaken of all CF patients (transplanted and non-transplanted) over the age of 16 who underwent an ESS over a six-year period from 2015 to 2021. Patients on triple-therapy CFTR modulators were excluded. Data was collected on demographics, clinical management, and outcome measures. The objective outcome measures were lung function (%predicted FEV1), pulmonary exacerbations (total number of days of IV antibiotics- both ambulatory and in hospital). The subjective outcome measure was SNOT-22 scores preand 6 months post-operatively. A minimally clinical important difference (MCID) in SNOT-22 scores of 9 points was used. 55 patients were included in our study, with a median age of 31 and 53% females. Median Lund-Mackay scores for the cohort was 13 (3- 24). There was a significant improvement in lung function at 1-year post-surgery, and a significant MCID reduction in SNOT-22 scores at 6 months post-surgery across the cohort. Sub-group analysis revealed a sustained MCID reduction in SNOT-22 scores in both lung-transplanted and native lung groups, and in patients with primary ESS or previous ESS. However, there was no post-operative pulmonary function improvement in lung transplanted patients and patients with previous ESS. There was no impact on the rate of pulmonary exacerbations across the cohort. 2 patients in the cohort died secondary to pulmonary disease. There was a demonstrated clinical and symptomatic benefit of ESS in CF patients in this study. Stricter guidelines for indications for ESS need to be established with regards to CF patients who will undergo ESS in the future.

A Survey on Biologics for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Among Members of the Korean Rhinologic Society

Background and Objectives: In 2021, biologics were approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Korea. However, CRS is a heterogeneous disease, and its characteristics are thought to differ between Western and Korean populations. This study aimed to evaluate the experiences of members of the Korean Rhinologic Society during the first year of biologic usage for the treatment of nasal polyps.Methods: An anonymous survey consisting of 15 items was conducted from November to December 2021. The survey included questions about participant demographics, use of biologics for treating CRSwNP, and expectations regarding the effectiveness of biologics for treating CRSwNP.Results: In total, 44 members participated in the survey. Approximately half of the respondents were in their 40s (50.0%) and had 5–9 years of clinical experience as otorhinolaryngologists (47.7%). The majority of participants held academic positions (95.4%). About half of them worked in Gyeonggi Province. The utilization of biologics did not differ significantly based on clinical experience (p=0.192). When asked about the factors considered for prescribing biologics, the most common reason was recurrence of polyps after surgery (87.2%). The most frequent reason for discontinuing biologics was cost (48.6%). When asked about the extent to which they expected that the availability of biologics for CRSwNP treatment would reduce endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), 45.5% of members expected a reduction of approximately 10%–29%. In addition, 20.5% expected a reduction of 50% or more. However, 61.4% expected a reduction of less than 10% in primary ESS. In addition, most respondents (93.2%) agreed with the need for Korea-specific guidelines for biologic treatment.Conclusion: There are discrepancies between the current guidelines for biologic treatment of CRSwNP and the reality of the situation, highlighting the need for the development of Korea-specific guidelines.

Anatomical findings in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps requiring revision surgery

ObjectivesFor the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a well-established therapy with high initial success rates. However, a significant proportion of patients have persistent disease requiring revision surgery. To date, studies including data of large patient collectives are missing. In this study, we aimed to identify anatomic factors increasing the need for revision surgery in a large patient collective with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. MethodsData were collected retrospectively on patients with recurrent or persistent chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps requiring revision surgery. The patients’ symptomatology, endoscopic and radiographic findings were analyzed. Preoperatively, patients were evaluated with endoscopic examination of the nose and paranasal sinuses. In all individuals computed tomography of the sinuses was performed. Images were evaluated according to the Lund-Mackay system. Information was also collected intraoperatively. Results253 patients were included. The most common anatomic factor was incomplete anterior ethmoidectomy (51%), followed by residual uncinated process (37%), middle turbinate lateralization (25%), incomplete posterior ethmoidectomy (20%), frontal recess scarring (19%), and middle meatal stenosis (9%). Other factors such as persistent sphenoid pathology was less frequent. ConclusionIatrogenic causes with inadequate resection of obstructing structures seem to be a principal risk factor for recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis and the need for revision sinus surgery. Meticulous attention in the area of the ostiomeatal complex during surgery with ventilation of obstructed anatomy as well as avoidance of scarring and turbinate destabilization may reduce the failure rate after primary endoscopic sinus surgery. Level of evidence2b.

Total times to treatment completion and clinical outcomes in odontogenic sinusitis

BackgroundMultidisciplinary collaboration is essential for effective odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) management. One point of debate has been the optimal timing of primary dental treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), but differences in time to completion of these treatment pathways have not been studied. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on ODS patients from 2015 to 2022. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, and various durations of time were analyzed from rhinologic consultation through treatment completion. Resolution of sinusitis symptoms and purulence on endoscopy was also recorded. ResultsEighty-nine ODS patients were analyzed (47.2 % male, median 59 years-old). Of the 89 ODS patients, 56 had treatable dental pathology, and 33 had no treatable dental pathology. Median time to treatment completion for all patients was 103 days. Of 56 ODS patients with treatable dental pathology, 33 had primary dental treatment, and 27 (81 %) required secondary ESS. In patients who underwent primary dental treatment followed by ESS, median time from initial evaluation to treatment completion was 236.0 days. If ESS was pursued primarily followed by dental treatment, median time from initial evaluation to treatment completion was 112.0 days, which was significantly shorter than if dental treatment was pursued primarily (p = 0.002). Overall symptomatic and endoscopic resolution was 97.8 %. ConclusionsAfter dental and sinus surgical treatment, ODS patients experienced 97.8 % resolution of symptoms and purulence on endoscopy. In patients with ODS due to treatable dental pathology, primary ESS followed by dental treatment resulted in a shorter overall treatment duration than primary dental treatment followed by ESS.

Revision Rates and Symptom Trends Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Impact of Race on Outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of demographics and sinonasal comorbidities on the revision rate of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is often successful in providing long-term relief for patients suffering from CRS, revision surgery can occur. There is conflicting literature on the impact of race on FESS outcomes. A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent FESS for CRS between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 at a single tertiary care academic center. A total of 682 patients between the ages of 18 and 89 underwent primary ESS between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 and were included in this study. Of these patients, 388 (56.9%) were female, with an average age of 48.6 ± 16.7. Thirty-eight patients (5.6%) underwent revision sinus surgery during the study period. Patients that identified as White had significantly lower rates of revision sinus surgery (4.1%) than non-White patients (10.7%), including those identifying as Asian, Black, multiracial, or other. On multivariate analysis, non-White race (OR 4.933), polyposis (3.175), and high preoperative SNOT-22 scores (OR 1.029) were independently associated with revision sinus surgery. The mean preoperative SNOT-22 for all participants was 39.1 ± 22.0, whereas the mean postoperative SNOT-22 was 20.6 ± 17.5 (p < 0.001). Race plays an important role in outcomes following revision sinus surgery that is independent of location and insurance status. More studies are required to assess the reason race plays an important role in outcomes following revision sinus surgery. Level 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2878-2884, 2023.

Current practices regarding middle turbinate resection among otolaryngologists.

Resection of the middle turbinate (MT) during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has been a controversial topic among otolaryngologists for many years. Some studies advocate resection and have shown improved outcomes postoperatively, while studies favoring preservation show a decreased incidence of postoperative complications. The current practice pattern regarding this subject is unknown. The goal of this study was to learn the current practice of MT resection during ESSamong otolaryngologists. We performed an electronic anonymous survey of practicing otolaryngologists. We found that the majority of the 252 responders stated that they will perform an MT resection in certain clinical situations, while there is a small subset that advocates never resecting the MT for inflammatory sinus disease (n = 6, 2.4%). Participants were significantly more likely to perform MT resection in patients undergoing revision compared to primary ESS for all conditions included. The complication of greatest concern among participants was iatrogenic frontal sinus obstruction, while empty nose was of the least concern. The majority of participants responded that MT resection was of extreme or moderate benefit for improved visualization and drug delivery postoperatively. When compared to general otolaryngologists, fellowship-trained rhinologists were less concerned about potential complications following MT resection and were more likely to perceive an extreme or moderate benefit from turbinate resection postoperatively. There remains debate over MT resection among otolaryngologists, but the results of this study show that the majority of participating otolaryngologists will perform a resection in certain clinical situations.

Structured histopathology and laboratory evidence in nasal polyposis with different pathogenesis

PurposeNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), intrinsic asthma, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and odontogenic sinusitis may be associated with nasal polyps. The aim of the study was to compare circulating inflammatory cells and structural histopathology of these groups of nasal polyposis. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 71 patients with nasal polyps stratified according to the above-mentioned pathogenesis. All patients underwent preoperative laboratory investigations and primary endoscopic sinus surgery. Surgical specimens were submitted to structured histopathological evaluation. ResultsThe median tissue eosinophil count (cells/HPF) was significantly different between the considered groups of nasal polyposis (p=0.0004). The median of NERD sub-cohort was significantly higher than intrinsic asthma (p=0.0030), odontogenic CRS (p=0.0001) and EGPA ones (p=0.0094). Eosinophilic aggregates positive rate was significantly higher in NERD sub-cohort than in odontogenic CRS (p=0.0072), EGPA (p=0.0497) and asthma (p=0.0188) ones. EGPA sub-cohort had a higher neutrophil infiltrate positive rate than NERD (p=0.0105) and intrinsic asthma ones (p=0.0040). Odontogenic CRS sub-cohort had a higher neutrophil infiltrate positive rate than NERD (p=0.0140) and asthma ones (p=0.0096). EGPA sub-cohort had a higher presence of fibrosis than NERD (p=0.0237) and odontogenic CRS sub-cohort (p=0.0107). Odontogenic sub-cohort had a lower sub-epithelial edema positive rate than NERD (p=0.0028) and asthma (p=0.0149) ones. ConclusionsStructural histopathology may identify nasal polyps histotypes with different morphological patterns. The identified histopathological features can facilitate the recognition of rational therapeutic and follow-up approaches that consider the tissue modifications associated with the response to drugs and surgery.

Complications of primary pediatric endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: A 25-year single surgeon experience.

ObjectiveTo report our experience on the complications of primary pediatric endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).MethodsCase series of pediatric ESS performed from 1991 to 2016 on children who failed maximal medical therapy and/or adenoidectomy. Inclusion criteria were children (age <12 years old) who underwent primary ESS with or without adenoidectomy for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) after failed maximal medical therapy and/or adenoidectomy. All patients underwent maxillary antrostomy ± partial or total ethmoidectomy. Patients with complicated acute rhinosinusitis were excluded. Complications reviewed included: skull base injury and CSF leak, orbital injuries (blindness, orbital hemorrhage, emphysema, periorbital swelling and bruising, fat exposure), and bleeding requiring intervention.ResultsA total of 352 patients underwent ESS between 1991 and 2016. There were no blindness or orbital hematoma reported, and no major nasal bleeding requiring intervention. The total number of complications was 31 (8.8%): 1 (0.3%) CSF leak, 3 (0.85%) orbital emphysema, 5 (1.4%) periorbital ecchymosis, and 22 (6.3%) lamina papyracea violation with orbital fat exposure.ConclusionsComplications of primary pediatric ESS can be rare dependent on surgeon's experience, the most common being orbital injury.Level of evidence: 4.

Odontogenic sinusitis: A state‐of‐the‐art review

Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is more common than historically reported, and is underrepresented in the sinusitis literature. ODS is distinct from rhinosinusitis in that it is infectious sinusitis from an infectious dental source or a complication from dental procedures, and most commonly presents unilaterally. ODS clinical features, microbiology, and diagnostic and treatment paradigms are also distinct from rhinosinusitis. ODS evaluation and management should generally be conducted by both otolaryngologists and dental providers, and clinicians must be able to suspect and confirm the condition. ODS suspicion is driven by certain clinical features like unilateral maxillary sinus opacification on computed tomography, overt maxillary dental pathology on computed tomography, unilateral middle meatal purulence on nasal endoscopy, foul smell, and odontogenic bacteria in sinus cultures. Otolaryngologists should confirm the sinusitis through nasal endoscopy by assessing for middle meatal purulence, edema, or polyps. Dental providers should confirm dental pathology through appropriate examinations and imaging. Once ODS is confirmed, a multidisciplinary shared decision‐making process should ensue to discuss risks and benefits of the timing and different types of dental and sinus surgical interventions. Oral antibiotics are generally ineffective at resolving ODS, especially when there is treatable dental pathology. When both the dental pathology and sinusitis are addressed, resolution can be expected in 90%–100% of cases. For treatable dental pathology, while primary dental treatment may resolve the sinusitis, a significant percentage of patients still require endoscopic sinus surgery. For patients with significant sinusitis symptom burdens, primary endoscopic sinus surgery is an option to resolve symptoms faster, followed by appropriate dental management. More well‐designed studies are necessary across all areas of ODS.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux in chronic rhinosinusitis patients and the role of endoscopic sinus surgery

ObjectivesLatest literature proposes laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as the underlying contributory factor for chronic inflammation in both upper and lower airways. In this study, we investigated LPR symptoms and signs of CRS patients and the various factors on their LPR symptoms and signs. We also evaluated the effect of the LPR symptoms and signs of CRS patients after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis from 91 patients who underwent primary ESS. They were assessed for LPR symptoms with Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) before ESS. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22, Lund–Mackay (LM) scoring system, and Lund-Kennedy (LK) scoring system were evaluated for CRS severity. They had to fulfill SNOT-22, RSI, and RFS at 6 months after surgery. ResultsNasal polyps, smoking, asthma, allergy, LM scores and LK scores didn't have significant correlations with preoperative RSI and RFS (P > .05 for all). RSI had significant correlations with SNOT-22 preoperatively and postoperatively (P < .05 for all). RFS had a significant correlation with postoperative SNOT-22 (P = 0.034). RSI and RFS decreased significantly more after ESS (P < 0.001 for both). Smoking had a significant effect on the postoperative RFS (P = 0.003). Non-smoker showed significantly lower scores of postoperative RFS (P = .0.003). ConclusionOur study suggests that subjective CRS symptoms were related with subjective LPR symptoms and ESS was effective in reducing signs and symptoms of LPR in CRS patients. Especially, smoking was associated with less improvement of laryngoscopic findings after ESS.

Creation of a Novel Preoperative Imaging Review Acronym to Aid in Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

(1) Identify anatomic contributions to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) necessitating revision endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS). (2) Create a clinical acronym to guide imaging review prior to RESS that addresses pertinent sites of disease and potential sites of surgical morbidity. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Medline via Embase.com, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar. Systematic search was performed using a combination of standardized terms and keywords. Studies were included if they investigated anatomic contributions to persistent CRS requiring RESS or the relationship between anatomic landmarks and surgical morbidity. Identified studies were screened by title/abstract, followed by full-text review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were strictly followed. In total, 599 articles met screening criteria, 89 were eligible for full-text review, and 27 studies were included in the final review. The identified anatomic sites of interests are broad; the most frequently cited anatomic region was retained anterior ethmoid cells (22/27 studies), followed by posterior ethmoid cells (14/27 studies). Using the consolidated information, a clinical acronym, REVISIONS, was created: Residual uncinate, Ethmoid cells (agger, Haller, supraorbital), Vessels (anterior and posterior ethmoid), Infundibulum, Septal deviation, I (eye) compartment, Onodi cell, Natural os, and Skull base slope and integrity. The REVISIONS acronym was developed as a tool to distill the unique anatomic contributions of primary endoscopic sinus surgery failure into a format that can be easily incorporated in preoperative radiologic review and surgical planning to optimize outcomes and minimize complications.

Expected Costs of Primary Dental Treatments and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Odontogenic Sinusitis.

Treatment of odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) due to apical periodontitis (AP) is highly successful when both dental treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) are performed. Variation exists in the literature with regard to types and timing of dental treatments and ESS when managing ODS. This study modeled expected costs of different primary dental and sinus surgical treatment pathways for ODS due to AP. Decision-tree economic model. Decision-tree models were created based on cost and treatment success probabilities. Using Medicare and consumer online databases, cost data were obtained for the following dental and sinus surgical treatments across the United States: root canal therapy (RCTx), revision RCTx, apicoectomy, extraction, dental implant, bone graft, and ESS (maxillary, ± anterior ethmoid, ± frontal). A literature review was performed to determine probabilities of dental and sinus disease resolution after different dental treatments. Expected costs were determined for primary dental extraction, RCTx, and ESS pathways, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Expected costs for the three different primary treatment pathways when dental care was in-network and all diseased sinuses opened during ESS were as follows: dental extraction ($4,753.83), RCTx ($4,677.34), and ESS ($7,319.85). ODS due to AP can be successfully treated with primary dental treatments, but ESS is still frequently required. Expected costs of primary dental extraction and RCTx were roughly equal. Primary ESS had a higher expected cost, but may still be preferred in patients with prominent sinonasal symptoms. Patients' insurance coverage may also impact decision-making. NA Laryngoscope, 132:1346-1355, 2022.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis Disease Disparity in the South Florida Hispanic Population.

The role of social determinants of health in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly characterized. Limited research examining CRS health disparities indicates that minority status is associated with worse CRS. However, many of these studies are retrospective or performed in populations without substantial ethnic minorities. Rhinologists need to characterize existing CRS disease disparities to develop targeted strategies for improving care in these populations. This prospective study assesses preoperative CRS disease burden in South Florida (SFL) Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients and examines potential factors contributing CRS disease disparities. Prospective cohort study. The prospective cohort study included consecutive patients having primary endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS between September 2019 and February 2020 with complete preoperative data. Data were collected in clinic and surgery. Descriptive statistics compare Hispanic and non-Hispanic cohorts. Linear regression adjusts for confounders. Relative risk (RR) compared CRS severity markers. Thirty-eight Hispanic and 56 non-Hispanic patients met inclusion criteria. Age, sex, CT scores, insurance payer, and comorbidities were similar between cohorts. Hispanics presented with worse 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) (55; SD=18) compared to non-Hispanics (37; SD=22) (P < .001). Hispanics tended to have a higher risk of severe CRS markers, including nasal polyps RR=2.5 (95% CI: 1.0-5.9), neo-osteogenesis RR=1.6 (95% CI: 0.5-4.7), extended procedures (i.e., draft III) RR=2.97 (95% CI: 1.0-9.1), and tissue eosinophilia RR=1.46 (95% CI: 0.6-3.5). Hispanics reported longer sinonasal symptom duration. SFL hispanic patients presenting for primary ESS have worse sinonasal disease burden. SFL Hispanics have markers of greater CRS severity and report longer delays before receiving CRS care. These factors may contribute to increased sinonasal disease burden in Hispanic patients. 3 Laryngoscope, 131:2659-2665, 2021.

Central compartment atopic disease: outcomes compared with other subtypes of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a variant of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) characterized by polypoid changes of the superior nasal septum, middle (MT), and/or superior turbinates (ST). This study evaluates surgical outcomes in patients with CCAD compared with other CRSwNP subtypes. Retrospective analysis was performed at Emory University from May 2012 to November 2019. Patients undergoing primary endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CCAD, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), and CRSwNP not otherwise specified (CRSwNP NOS) were included consecutively, beginning with the earliest date of CCAD patient. Outcome measures included polyp recurrence, revision ESS, oral steroid use, and oral antibiotic use. Pearson chi-square and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed for group comparisons. Data was collected for 132 patients (CCAD=38, AERD=20, AFRS=37, CRSwNP NOS=37; 58 females, mean age 42.9 years [range, 13-85 years]). CCAD patients demonstrated polyp recurrence less frequently than expected, whereas AFRS patients had polyp recurrence more frequently than expected (p=0.003; phi 0.32). CCAD patients underwent revision ESS less frequently than expected; AFRS and CRSwNP NOS underwent revision ESS more frequently than expected (p=0.03; phi 0.26). CRSwNP NOS patients received more total antibiotic courses than those with CCAD (p=0.01; eta-squared 0.09) and more courses of antibiotics per month than those with AFRS (p=0.03; eta-squared 0.07). There was no significant difference in follow-up measures across groups (number of visits, total months, or visits per month). Rates of polyp recurrence and revision ESS were significantly lower in CCAD patients compared with patients with other CRSwNP subtypes, suggesting durable benefit of ESS and postoperative medical therapy in CCAD patients.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Maxillary Sinus Balloon Sinuplasty and ESS.

The aim of this controlled follow-up study was to compare the need for revision surgery, long-term efficacy, and satisfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis patients who had undergone maxillary sinus operation with either balloon sinuplasty or traditional endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) technique. Thirty-nine ESS patients and 36 balloon patients of our previously described cohort, who had been primarily operated in 2008 to 2010, were contacted by phone. Symptoms, satisfaction, and need for revision surgery were asked. In addition, we collected data of patients who had undergone primary maxillary sinus balloon sinuplasty in the Helsinki University Hospital during the years 2005 to 2019. As a control group, we collected data of patients who had undergone primary maxillary sinus ESS at 3 Finnish University Hospitals, and 1 Central Hospital in years 2005, 2008, and 2011. Altogether, 77 balloon patients and 82 ESS patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 5.3 years in balloon group and 9.8 years in ESS group. Revision surgery was performed on 17 balloon patients and 6 ESS patients. In the survival analysis, the balloon sinuplasty associated significantly with a higher risk of revision surgery compared to ESS. According to the phone interviews, 82% of ESS patients and 75% of balloon patients were very satisfied with the primary operation. Although the patient groups expressed equal satisfaction and change in symptoms after the operations, the need for revision surgery was higher after balloon sinuplasty than after ESS. This should be emphasized when counselling patients regarding surgical options.

Middle turbinate handling during ESS. Our experience

PurposeThe treatment of middle turbinate (MT) during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains a controversial issue. Several authors recommended preservation of MT to avoid complications, but MT resection is sometimes necessary. In the last years, our group has applied an original surgical technique to preserve MT, stabilize its head and ensure patency of the ostiomeatal complex (OMC) in ESS. We herein described this approach to the MT and reported its preliminary results in terms of post-operative endoscopic features and complications. MethodsThe study retrospectively considered 34 consecutive adult patients suffering from CRS and treated with primary or revision ESS. Medialization of the MT and its stabilization to achieve post-operative patency of the OMC was obtained by means of: (i) creation of a surgically controlled synechia between the MT head and nasal septum; (ii) positioning of a silicone plate in the OMC. The silicone splints kept the MT head in an obliged position to contact the septum. ResultsAt 12-month follow-up control, we found: (i) stabilized MT medialization in all treated cases, (ii) only one case of lateral synechia without recurrent CRS, and (iii) a polypoid recurrence rate of 13%. ConclusionsThe MT handling technique during ESS herein preliminarily described seems to be an effective approach to medialize and stabilize the MT. This technique could be particularly appropriate for unstable MT after removing massive inflammatory lesions of the mucosa.

ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY DECISION AND TIMING FOR ENDODONTIC ORIGIN SINUSITIS AFTER FAILURE OF PRIMARY MEDICAL TREATMENT

Background: Odontogenic sinus disease require optimal management that involves definitive treatment of the underlying dental pathology. Further endodontic management with root canal, dental extraction, or apicoectomy. So, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is recommended for patients who fail initial medical and/or dental treatment. However, the optimal timing for ESS is still unclear in literatures. Objective: The aim of this study is to find the optimal time for ESS in odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) patients after the failure of the primary medical treatment. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on 25 patients with ODS: 14 males and 11 females. After the failure of primary medical treatment, these patients had preferred and undergone ESS. Another 21 patients who had dental intervention were used for comparison (12 females and 9 males). Assessment of the outcome was performed by SNOT-22 questionnaire to all patients. Results: The patients improved as there is a decrease in SNOT-22 score from 38.75 ± 9.56 to 15.7 ± 18.12 in ESS group (p =0.000), more than dental group that decreased from 37.93 ± 11.3 to 28.42 ± 21.7 (p= 0.039). It was observed that the SNOT-22 score increased as the time of intervention increased, so it is advised to start ESS as early as possible to have a successful surgery. Conclusion: An early ESS of ODS is a clue for a fast and successful treatment outcome. So, it is recommended that primary ESS is first to be performed, particularly in patients sufferings severe unresolved sinusitis, followed by dental treatment.

Doyle silicone splint insertion: endoscopy-assisted versus nasal speculum assisted

IntroductionSeptoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery are very often concurrently performed operations in otolaryngology practice. The most common complication of endoscopic sinus surgery is lateralization of the middle turbinate. In our practice intranasal stenting is done routinely with Doyle silicone splints. ObjectiveRetrospectively, we aimed to review the postoperative period and to document efficacy of endoscopy-assisted Doyle silicone splint application on prevention of middle turbinate lateralization. MethodsPatients who had failed medical therapy and who underwent elective primary endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with septal deviation requiring septoplasty were included to the study. Doyle silicone splints were inserted to all patients at the end of the operation with nasal speculum or with endoscopic assistance. Groups were compared for position of the middle turbinate at the end of the postoperative first month regarding lateralization and for pain score recorded on the second postoperative day. ResultsIn the Doyle silicone splints applied with nasal speculum group, there were 46 patients with a total of 80 operated sides. In the endoscopy assisted group, there were 54 patients with a total of 88 operated sides. At the 1 month follow-up, the mean of middle turbinate position scores was 1.62 in the speculum-assisted group and 1.80 in the endoscopy-assisted group, the difference between two groups was found to be statistically significant. Mean of postoperative second day pain scores were worse in patients with the Doyle silicone splints applied with endoscopic assistance. This difference was found statistically significant. ConclusionIn our study, after concomitant endoscopic sinus surgery and septoplasty, less middle turbinate lateralization was observed when the Doyle silicone splints were inserted with endoscopic guidance. The surgical techniques or methods of sinus packing as well as nasal packing may have an impact on middle turbinate lateralization after concurrent septoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery.

Clinical predictors of revision surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis within 5-year follow-up

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) remains a difficult-to-cure disease. The aim of this study was to determine the potential long-term predictors of revision sinus surgery for CRSwNP. Prospectively gathered patients with bilateral CRSwNP who received primary endoscopic sinus surgery were enrolled. Clinical variables, including the preoperative Lund-Mackay score (LMS), were collected to clarify possible risk factors for revision surgery within a 5-year follow-up. The symptomatic burden was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) before and 1year after surgery. Further survival analysis was performed to present the revision-free survival in Kaplan-Meier plotting. Eighty four qualified patients were identified and all of them experienced significant improvement in VAS after primary surgery. The 5-year revision rate was 19.05%, and the mean time of revision surgery was 25.31±17.11months postoperatively. Nasal allergy (OR=9.287; p=0.011) and LMS (OR=1.29; p=0.06) were found to be the independent risk factors for revision surgery. The discriminatory power of LMS for revision surgery was acceptable (AUC=0.79) with the best cutoff point located at LMS>13.5. Patients with both nasal allergy and LMS≧14 had only half of revision-free survival in comparison to overall survival (38.1% vs. 80.95%, p<0.001). In patients with CRSwNP who have concurrent nasal allergy and higher preoperative LMS may indicate an advanced disease status and eventually be in a high risk of revision surgery after a long-term follow-up. An outcome-based staging system will be helpful in the future to improve the prognosis for CRSwNP.

Pathophysiology of current odontogenic maxillary sinusitis and endoscopic sinus surgery preceding dental treatment

ObjectiveThe successful management of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis (OMS) involves a combination of medical treatment with dental surgery and/or endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). However, there is no consensus for the optimal timing of ESS. Although several studies have emphasized dental surgery as the primary treatment modality for OMS, there is recent evidence to suggest that ESS alone may be an effective treatment approach.The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate the pathophysiology of the current intractable OMS and the role ESS, especially ESS preceding dental treatment, plays in its pathophysiology. MethodsNinety-seven adults (60 males and 37 females, 48 ± 12 years) who underwent ESS for intractable OMS were retrospectively examined. ResultsIn a great deal of the cases (85 cases, 87.6%), causative teeth of OMS were periapical lesions after root canal treatment (endodontics). The root canal procedures were not sufficient; hence, the root-canal-treated teeth had periapical lesions causing OMS.In postoperative nasal endoscopy and cone-beam CT scans for all patients, the natural ostiums and the membranous portions of the maxillary sinuses were enlarged and the ostiomeatal complexes remained widely open. The ventilation and drainage of all patients’ maxillary sinuses seemed to be successfully restored.Temporary acute sinusitis recurrence after primary ESS for OMS was observed in 10 cases (11.8%) when the patients caught a cold. However, since the natural ostium and the membranous portion of the maxillary sinuses and the ostiomeatal complexes remained widely open, antibiotic administration alone without dental treatment cured the temporary acute sinusitis.Regarding the causative teeth (endodontic treated teeth), in 83 out of 85 cases (97.6%), causative teeth were able to be preserved with only antibiotic treatment and without dental retreatment. In two cases, extraction of the teeth was necessary because the teeth became mobile. Regarding the causative teeth after dental restoration, in 2 out of 2 cases (100%), causative teeth were able to be preserved with antibiotic treatment alone. ConclusionESS is highly indicated for OMS requiring surgery. The treatment results of intractable OMS are exceptionally good once the ventilation and drainage of the maxillary sinus is successfully restored after surgery. Consequently, ESS can be considered the first-line therapy for intractable OMS caused by root canal treatment (endodontics) and dental restoration, followed by close dental follow-up and dental treatment when necessary.