Primary Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Research Articles

Microscope Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy.

PurposeTo describe the outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) and to evaluate the role of microscope integrated optical coherence tomography (Mi-OCT) during the surgery.DesignRetrospective data analysis.MethodsA retrospective study from the medical records of all those patients who were diagnosed with CHED and underwent DSAEK at our centre from 2015 were evaluated. All patients underwent Mi-OCT-guided standard DSAEK procedure. Intra-operative difficulties, visual outcomes and graft survival were recorded.ResultsA total of 48 eyes of 29 patients with a mean age of 9.87 ± 8.2 years and mean follow-up of 17.3 months were evaluated. Thirty-nine eyes underwent primary DSAEK and 9 eyes underwent PKP. Three eyes who underwent PKP had failed graft for which they underwent DSAEK. The mean preoperative Snellen’s visual acuity was 1.71 ± 0.66 and the mean preoperative central corneal thickness was 1.10 ± 0.174 mm. Intraoperatively, all the grafts were attached which was confirmed using Mi-OCT. Graft detachment was seen in the immediate postoperative period in 10.4% (4 eyes) of primary DSAEK, out of which DM scoring was not performed in 2 eyes. Following DSAEK, cornea cleared at four-week follow-up in 89.7% eyes and in all the eyes the cornea cleared at six-week follow-up.ConclusionPrimary DSAEK could be a preferred option over PKP for CHED with early presentation and in those eyes with failed primary PKP. Mi-OCT is a very useful tool in these eyes for various intraoperative procedures, thereby improving the outcomes of the procedure.

Outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for corneal decompensation following primary Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).MethodsThis was a retrospective case series of 15 patients that underwent DMEK surgery for corneal decompensation after failed DSAEK. Main outcome parameter was corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) after DMEK and DSAEK. Secondary outcome measures included central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rate, and primary graft failure after DMEK. Explanted DSAEK grafts were evaluated by light microscopy.ResultsThe mean (±SD) time period between DSAEK and DMEK surgery was 15±8 months (range, 6–31 months). Preoperative CDVA was 1.72±0.62 (logMAR). After DMEK, CDVA improved significantly to 0.78±0.48 at 1 month and to 0.23±0.24 after 12 months (P=0.022). Visual acuity data after DMEK were significantly better compared to preoperative values. The average CCT after DMEK decreased significantly from 869±210 µm (preoperative) to 505±45 µm (1 month postoperative) (P<0.001) and remained stable over 12 months. The ECD decreased from 2,589±209/mm2 (preoperative) to 1,691±589/mm2 (12 months postoperative). Rebubbling DMEK was required in three patients (=20%).ConclusionDMEK represents a feasible and safe procedure in achieving better functional results compared to DSAEK. Visual acuity and optical quality can be effectively reestablished after unsuccessful primary DSAEK surgery even in patients with long-standing corneal decompensation. Further investigations are required to validate the preliminary clinical findings.

Factors Associated With Graft Detachment After Primary Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

To identify risk factors associated with postoperative graft detachment after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). In this retrospective institutional cohort study, the study group included all consecutive eyes that underwent primary DSAEK between January 2005 and October 2015 at Villa Serena-Villa Igea private hospitals (Forlì, Italy) and developed postoperative graft detachment (n = 45). The control group included all eyes that underwent primary DSAEK during the same period and did not develop graft detachment (n = 1167). The main outcome measure was whether or not postoperative graft detachment occurred. Main indications for surgery included Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (525/1212 = 41%), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (422/1212 = 35%), and a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) graft (190/1212 = 16%). Postoperative graft detachment occurred in 45 of 1212 (3.7%) eyes. Medically treated glaucoma, previous trabeculectomy, previous aqueous shunt procedure, and failed PK were all associated with an increased risk for graft detachment in univariate analysis. No particular lens status at the time of graft implantation was significantly associated with graft detachment, including the presence of an anterior chamber intraocular lens [odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-6.46, P = 0.58] or aphakia at the time of graft transplantation (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.41-4.57, P = 0.74). Cataract removal during surgery was not associated with an increased risk for detachment (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.39-1.5, P = 0.47). Previous trabeculectomy (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.53-11.56, P = 0.005) and a previous failed PK graft (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.6-5.78, P = 0.001) were the only independent risk factors for graft detachment in multivariate analyses. Previous PK and trabeculectomy are independent risk factors for postoperative graft detachment in primary DSAEK.

Evaluation of factors affecting visual acuity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

To elucidate the factors affecting visual acuity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent primary DSAEK for corneal endothelial dysfunction at Inouye Eye Hospital from January 2010 through January 2015 and who had a follow-up of at least 6months. Fifty-four eyes of 49 patients (24 men and 25 women) were enrolled; the mean age was 72.5±8.7years. Medical charts were retrospectively examined for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), intraocular pressure, keratometric value, keratometric cylinder, grade of preoperative corneal edema, preoperative graft thickness, and endothelial cell density (ECD) before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24months after surgery. A multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the factors associated with BSCVA at 3, 6months, and 1year after surgery. Explanatory variables included age, sex, preoperative factors (BSCVA, degree of corneal edema, donor ECD, and graft thickness), and factors at each time point (keratometric value, keratometric cylinder, and intraocular pressure). The mean logarithms of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BSCVA preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12months after surgery were 1.03±0.49, 0.42±0.26, 0.29±0.21, 0.24±0.20, and 0.22±0.20, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that preoperative BSCVA alone was significantly associated with BSCVA at 3, 6, and 12months. A better preoperative BSCVA was associated with a better BSCVA after DSAEK, which suggests that DSAEK should be considered earlier than stromal changes such as subepithelial fibrosis occurrence.

Risk Factors Predicting the Need for Graft Exchange After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

To identify the risk factors predicting the need for graft exchange after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). This is a retrospective cohort study. The study group included all 117 eyes that underwent or necessitated repeat DSAEK performed between January 2005 and June 2014 at Villa Serena-Villa Igea private hospitals (Forlì, Italy). The control group consisted of 1033 eyes that underwent only primary DSAEK during the same period. Demographic details, indications for primary surgery, ocular preoperative status and comorbidities, donor endothelial cell density (ECD), and postoperative complications were compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate analyses. The prevalence of graft failure necessitating graft exchange was 10.2% (117 of 1150 eyes). In univariate analysis, a diagnosis of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy was a protective factor against the risk of repeat DSAEK. Prior trabeculectomy or aqueous shunt implantation, postoperative graft detachment, lower donor ECD, and a rejection episode were all associated with a significantly higher risk of requiring repeat DSAEK. The presence of buphthalmos, anterior chamber intraocular lens, aphakia, or prior penetrating keratoplasty were not risk factors for the failure of DSAEK. Of these variables, multivariate analysis showed that only prior aqueous shunt implantation [odds ratio (OR) = 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4-22.2], lower donor ECD (OR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.997-0.999), and a documented postoperative rejection episode (OR = 18.2, 95% CI, 7.9-45.0) predicted the need for repeat DSAEK. DSAEK grafts have similarly good long-term survival regardless of the indication for surgery, lens status, or ocular comorbidities, with the only exception being the presence of an aqueous shunt.

DSAEK après échec de kératoplastie perforante

To report the anatomic and functional outcomes of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in 32 eyes after failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). This retrospective, single-center observational study was performed on 32 eyes of 26 patients with failed PK grafts who underwent DSAEK between June 2009 and June 2013 at Clermont-Ferrand University Medical Center. Primary outcomes measured were: graft survival rates, functional improvement (visual acuity), and complications. Mean follow-up was 16.45 months [6-36]. Graft survival at 12 months was 76.1 % [68.1-82.3]. PK grafts cleared in 75 % of cases. Eight primary DSAEKs detached and/or decentered early (prior to day 8, average 6.22 days): 3 underwent repeat DSAEK with a new graft, and 3 underwent conversion to PK. Results were available for 26 patients at 6 months. Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR increased from 1.48 (counting fingers at 2 meters) to 0.996 logMAR (1/10) at 6 months. BCVA improved in 17 patients (68 %). BCVA improved an average of 5.2 lines (P=0.0006). Eight patients had a large number of comorbid conditions that limited final visual acuity. Anatomic outcomes are similar to other studies. Final average BCVA was limited by severe comorbid conditions and performance of DSAEK solely for comfort. Many surgical strategies have been described to decrease graft dislocation and primary graft failure. Adapting graft trephine diameter to the host cornea as measured by AS-OCT, using a nomogram based on posterior corneal curvature obtained on AS-OCT, may be an interesting approach. DSAEK allows for quick visual recovery by preserving the anterior corneal curvature. It is an essential option for restoring corneal clarity in PK failure due to endothelial decompensation. A longer follow-up would allow a comparison of graft survival for the two techniques in this context.

Comparison of corneal haze and visual outcome in primary DSAEK versus DSAEK following failed DMEK

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is being proposed as the procedure of choice in corneal endothelial disease as it achieves better visual and refractive outcomes than Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Nevertheless, primary graft failure is frequent, especially during the learning curve, and secondary back-up procedure consists on DSAEK. We aim to compare corneal haze and visual acuity of patients undergoing primary DSAEK vs. patients undergoing DSAEK as a back-up procedure after primary DMEK failure. This study is a comparative case series that included 19 eyes from 16 patients with early stages of corneal failure and limitation of daily activities after primary DSAEK or secondary DSAEK. A control group of non-operated corneas included 10 aged-matched normal eyes. The study was conducted at University Hospital Ramón y Cajal and Vissum Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Corneal densitometry readings and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity in subjects with primary and secondary DSAEK were recorded 6 months after the surgery using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system (Oculus, inc.,Wetzlar, Germany). In primary DSAEK median densitometry values (range) were statistically significantly higher (p < 0.05) than normal subjects for the full thickness, posterior and anterior part of the paracentral cornea; and the anterior part of the central cornea. In secondary DSAEK, median densitometry values were statistically significantly higher than normal subjects at all levels of the central and paracentral cornea. In secondary DSAEK, median densitometry values (range) were statistically significantly higher than in primary DSAEK in the full-thickness, anterior part and interface of the central cornea and in the full-thickness and posterior part of the paracentral cornea. Median visual acuity between groups (p = 0.47) was statistically better for the primary DSAEK group, which also had a higher percentage of patients achieving BCVA of ≥ 20/40 and ≥ 20/25 than the secondary DSAEK group (100% vs. 62% and 60% vs. 0% respectively). There is an increase in central corneal light scattering after secondary DSAEK performed after a failed DMEK as compared to primary DSAEK. This has a negative impact on final visual acuity that needs to be considered in each patient when starting DMEK surgery.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty After Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty

To report the rate of graft dislocation, surgical anatomic success, and postsurgical complications associated with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) after previous primary failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study of 30 eyes of 30 patients with prior failed PK who underwent DSAEK with a minimum of 3 months follow-up. Primary outcomes measured included rates of anatomic success and failure, postoperative complications, lenticle size, visual acuity, intraocular pressure change, and a report of external factors that may affect success. Thirty eyes of 30 patients were identified. The primary dislocation rate was 16.7%. Five primary DSAEKs detached; 1 was successfully rebubbled in the office, 2 had repeat successful DSAEKs, and 2 failed on a second attempt and had a subsequent PK. Despite successful anatomic attachment, 1 eye had primary graft failure, 3 that cleared initially failed within 6 months, and 1 that successfully cleared had subsequent graft rejection resulting in failure at 6 months. The 2 eyes requiring PK were excluded from the visual outcomes analysis, leaving 28 eyes with successfully attached lenticles. At 3 months postoperatively, of the 28 eyes, 19 showed an improvement in visual acuity, 6 had no change in vision from preoperative data, and 1 had worsening of vision (anatomic attachment but endothelial failure). Two of the 28 eyes had no data at that time point. DSAEK eyes after failed PK demonstrated improved vision with a low complication rate in a majority of patients. The graft dislocation rate and postoperative complications rates are comparable with the primary DSAEK dislocation rates in our own published series and in the literature.

Retrospective Review of Graft Dislocation Rate Associated With Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty After Primary Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty

To report the rate of graft dislocation in patients who underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) after a previous penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Institutional review board-approved, multicenter, retrospective chart review. Inclusion criteria included: prior failed PKP and subsequent DSAEK. The primary outcomes measured in this study were the presence of a graft dislocation, rate of rebubble, and graft attachment. Additional variables included: presence of a prior glaucoma drainage device, graft-to-host size disparity, number of sutures remaining in PKP, and stripping of the Descemet membrane at the time of DSAEK surgery. Ninety patients (97 eyes) were included in the study. In 31% (30 of 97), the endothelial graft dislocated after surgery. All 30 cases required a rebubble except 1, which reattached spontaneously. Ninety-eight percent (95 of 97) of all grafts remained attached for the duration of the follow-up period. Only 2 eyes (2.2%) required repeat graft. Endothelial grafts dislocated in 67% of patients with glaucoma draining devices. The dislocation rate for grafts larger than the host was 12 of 49 (24%), equal to the host was 3 of 17 (18%), and smaller than the host was 8 of 19 (42%). Dislocations occurred in 5 of 21 (24%) of grafts with sutures remaining and 22 of 76 (29%) of those with all sutures out. Five of 12 (42%) cases of grafts performed without stripping the Descemet had dislocations. The graft dislocation rate in DSAEK procedures after PKP is comparable to that after primary DSAEK cases. Donor grafts that are smaller than the host PKP and the presence of prior glaucoma drainage devices are risk factors for higher rates of graft dislocation.

Secondary Graft Failure and Repeat Endothelial Keratoplasty after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

To identify the causes of secondary graft failure after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat endothelial keratoplasty (REK) in this patient population. Retrospective case series. Patients of a private practice Price Vision Group in Indianapolis, Indiana. An initial consecutive series of primary DSAEK procedures performed by a single surgeon between October 2004 and December 2008 was reviewed to identify reasons for and outcomes of REK. Visual acuity and causes of secondary graft failure. In a consecutive series of 1050 primary DSAEK procedures, REK for secondary graft failure was performed in 37 eyes (3.5%). The most common reason for REK in this group was unsatisfactory visual acuity relative to the anticipated vision potential (n = 28/37; 76%). Unsatisfactory visual acuity was associated with abnormalities of donor tissue within the pupillary area, including wrinkles or folds, irregular graft thickness, and opacity in the interface. In the 28 eyes with unacceptable visual acuity after initial DSAEK, the median best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) before and after REK was 20/60 (range, 20/40-20/400) and 20/30 (range, 20/20-20/100), respectively, and 75% had BSCVA 20/40 or better after REK. The mean corneal thickness in the 28 eyes regrafted for unsatisfactory vision before and after REK was 809 μm (range, 642-979 μm) and 657 μm (range, 549-801 μm), respectively. Secondary graft failure caused by endothelial decompensation was the reason for repeat endothelial graft in the remaining 9 eyes (9/37; 24%). Eight eyes had a history of glaucoma, and 6 of them had glaucoma surgery. An episode of immune rejection reaction was documented in 6 of 9 eyes with endothelial decompensation. Our data suggest that the most common reason for REK after DSAEK is unsatisfactory vision. Patient and physician expectations for visual acuity are higher with DSAEK compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Repeat endothelial keratoplasty can provide improved vision in selected patients.