Primary Decompression Research Articles

Isolated decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis is less costly than fusion even with high revision rates

BACKGROUND CONTEXTIsolated decompression and decompression with instrumented fusion are accepted surgical treatments for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Although isolated decompression is a less costly solution with similar patient-reported outcomes, it is associated with higher rates of reoperation than primary fusion. PURPOSETo determine the costs associated with primary decompression, primary fusion, and decompression and fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. We further sought to establish at what revision rate is primary decompression still a less costly surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGA retrospective database study of the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) limited data set. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients who underwent single-level fusion or decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis. OUTCOME MEASURESCost of surgical care. METHODSAll inpatient stays that underwent surgery for single-level lumbar/lumbosacral degenerative spondylolisthesis in the 2019 calendar year (n=6,653) were queried from the MEDPAR limited data set. Patients were stratified into three cohorts: primary decompression (n=300), primary fusion (n=5,757), and revision fusion (n=566). Univariate analysis was conducted to determine cost differences between these groups and results were confirmed with multivariable regression. An economic analysis was then done to determine at what revision rate would primary decompression still be a less costly treatment choice. resultson univariate analysis, the cost of primary single-level decompression for spondylolisthesis was $14,690±9,484, the cost of primary single-level fusion was $26,376±11,967, and revision fusion was $26,686±11,309 (p<0.001). on multivariate analysis, primary fusion was associated with an increased cost of $3,751, and revision fusion was associated with increased cost of $7,502 (95%ci: 2,990-4,512, p<0.001). economic analysis found that a revision rate less than or equal to 43.8% would still result in primary decompression being less costly for a practice than primary fusion for all patients. CONCLUSIONSIsolated decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a less costly treatment choice even with rates of revision fusion as high as 43.8%. This was true even with an assumed revision rate of 0% after primary fusion. This study solely looks at cost data, however, and many patients may still benefit from primary fusion when appropriately indicated.

Reoperation Following Primary Greater Occipital Nerve Decompression Surgery: Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes.

Although nerve decompression surgery is an effective treatment for refractory occipital neuralgia (ON), a proportion of patients experience recurrence of pain and undergo reoperation. This study analyzes the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of reoperation following primary greater occipital nerve (GON) decompression. 215 patients who underwent 399 primary GON decompressions were prospectively enrolled. Data included patient demographics, past medical and surgical history, reoperation rates, intraoperative findings, surgical technique, and postoperative outcomes in terms of pain frequency (days/month), duration (hours/day), intensity (scale 0-10), and migraine headache index (MHI). Bivariate analyses, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. 27 (6.8%) GON decompressions required reoperation with neurectomy at a median follow-up time of 15.5 months (9.8-40.5). Cervical spine disorders on imaging that did not warrant surgical intervention (OR, 4.88; 95% 1.61-14.79; p<0.01) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.45-15.2; p<0.05) were significantly associated with higher rates of reoperation. At 12 months postoperatively, patients who underwent reoperation achieved similar mean reductions in pain frequency, duration, intensity and MHI, as compared to patients who underwent only primary decompression (p>0.05). Patients with ON who have a history of cervical spine disorders or RFA should be counseled that primary decompression has a higher risk of reoperation, but outcomes are ultimately comparable.

Decompressive craniectomy: A primer for acute care practitioners.

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) involves surgical removal of the skull that overlies swollen, imperiled, brain. This is done to combat intracranial hypertension and mitigate a vicious cycle of secondary brain injury. If, instead, this pathophysiology goes uninterrupted, it can mean brain herniation and brain stem death. As such, DC can save lives when all else fails. Regardless, it is no panacea and can also "ruin deaths," and leave patients profoundly disabled. DC is not a new procedure; however, this therapy is increasingly noteworthy due to advances in neurocritical care, alongside ethical concerns. We cover the physiological rationale, the surgical basics, the trial data, and focus on secondary decompression (for refractory intracranial pressure (ICP)) rather than primary decompression (i.e. during evacuation of an intracranial mass). Given that DC should not be undertaken indiscriminately, we conclude by introducing ways in which to discuss DC with families and colleagues. Our goal is to provide a primer and common resource for the multidisciplinary team. We aim to increase not only knowledge but wisdom, prudence, collegiality, and family-focused care.

Paired and matched analysis of neurological outcomes in revision surgery for cervical myelopathy following delayed neurological decline.

Delayed neurological decline may be experienced following successful decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy. Our objective was to analyze neurological recovery upon revision surgery with relation to the index procedure and a matched control. Fourteen patients underwent both primary and revision decompression at a single academic center. Peri-operative clinical, radiological, and surgical details were retrieved. Neurological outcomes [change in modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA), recovery ratio] following the second surgery were compared to (I) the primary operation and (II) a control subject receiving primary decompression matched for gender, age, mJOA score, and surgical approach. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in mJOA score was set at 2.5. Revision decompressions were performed 6.8±4.2 years following the index surgery, when patients were 61.4±11.0 years of age. An increase in mJOA score of 2.7±2.0 following revision surgery was similar to that achieved after the primary operation (2.2±2.1, P=0.616). A recovery ratio of 38.1%±25.4% upon revision compared favorably to that following the primary operation (35.0%±37.4%, P=0.867). Non-inferiority testing between revision surgery and the first operation (P=0.02) demonstrated a similar capacity to achieve the MCID as did comparison with matched subjects (P<0.01). Patients were able to make up for lost neurological gains following revision surgery. Careful selection of cases for revision likely facilitated recovery. Recovery trajectories should be consolidated upon larger sample sizes allowing for identification of prognostic factors.

The Use of Nerve Caps after Nerve Transection in Headache Surgery: Cadaver and Case Reports.

Nerve transection with nerve reconstruction is part of the treatment algorithm for patients with refractory pain after greater occipital nerve (GON) and lesser occipital nerve (LON) decompression or during primary decompression when severe nerve injury or neuroma formation is present. Importantly, the residual nerve stump is often best addressed via contemporary nerve reconstruction techniques to avoid recurrent pain. As a primary aim of this study, nerve capping is explored as a potential viable alternative that can be utilized in certain headache cases to mitigate pain. The technical feasibility of nerve capping after GON/LON transection was evaluated in cadaver dissections and intraoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes in the 3- to 4-month period were compiled from clinic visits. At 1-year follow-up, subjective outcomes and Migraine Headache Index scores were tabulated. Two patients underwent nerve capping as a treatment for headaches refractory to medical therapy and surgical decompressions with significant improvement to total resolution of pain without postoperative complications. These improvements on pain frequency, intensity, and duration remained stable at a 1-year time point (Migraine Headache Index score reductions of -180 to -205). Surgeons should be equipped to address the proximal nerve stump to prevent neuroma and neuropathic pain recurrence. Next to known contemporary nerve reconstruction techniques such as targeted muscle reinnervation/regenerative peripheral nerve interface and relocation nerve grafting, nerve capping is another viable method for surgeons to address the proximal nerve stump in settings of GON and LON pain. This option exhibits short operative time, requires only limited dissection, and yields significant clinical improvement in pain symptoms.

Recalcitrant Neuropathies in the Upper Extremity

Carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome can cause debilitating pain and weakness in the hand and upper extremities. Although most patients have a resolution of their symptoms after primary decompression, managing those with recalcitrant neuropathies is challenging. The etiology of persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms is not always clear and requires careful attention to the history and physical examination to confirm the diagnosis or consider other causes prior to committing to surgery. Nevertheless, revision surgery is often needed in the setting of recalcitrant neuropathies in order to improve patients' symptoms. Revision surgery typically entails wide exposure and neurolysis to release residual compression. In addition, vascularized tissue and nerve wraps have been routinely used to create a favorable perineural environment that decreases recurrent scar formation. This review discusses the etiologies of recalcitrant upper extremity neuropathies, the current treatment options, and surgical outcomes.

Degree Of Cisternal Compression As An Independent Prognostic Factor For Outcome In Both Craniotomy and Primary Decompressive Craniectomy Groups In Acute Subdural Hematoma Population

Degree Of Cisternal Compression As An Independent Prognostic Factor For Outcome In Both Craniotomy and Primary Decompressive Craniectomy Groups In Acute Subdural Hematoma Population

Evidence-Based Patient Selection in Headache Surgery: Impact of Preoperative Radiofrequency Ablation on Surgical Outcomes.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the greater occipital nerve (GON) is a minimally invasive treatment option commonly used in patients with occipital neuralgia. Patients who undergo occipital surgery for headaches after failed RFA treatment present a unique opportunity to evaluate RFA-treated occipital nerves and determine the impact on headache surgery outcomes. Of 115 patients who underwent headache surgery at the occipital site, 29 had a history of RFA treatment. Migraine Headache Index, Pain Self- Efficacy Questionnaire, and Pain Health Questionnaire-2 outcome scores were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up visits. Intraoperative macroscopic nerve damage and surgical outcomes were compared between RFA-treated and non-RFA-treated patients. RFA-treated patients had a higher rate of macroscopic nerve damage (45%) than non-RFA-treated patients (24%) ( P = 0.03), and they were significantly more likely to require a second operation at the site of primary decompression (27.6% versus 5.8%; P = 0.001) and GON transection (13.8% versus 3.5%; P = 0.04). Outcome scores at the last follow-up visit showed no statistically significant difference between RFA-treated and non-RFA-treated patients ( P = 0.96). RFA-treated patients can ultimately achieve outcomes that are not significantly different from non-RFA-treated patients in occipital headache surgery. However, a higher number of secondary operations at the site of primary decompression and nerve transection are required to treat refractory symptoms. RFA-treated patients should be counseled about an increased risk of same-site surgery and possible GON transection to achieve acceptable outcomes. Therapeutic, III.

Canadian Spine Society

# Abstract 57. Radiographic reporting in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is there a discrepancy comparing radiologists’ reports and surgeons’ assessments? {#article-title-2} Cobb angle measurement is the standard method for quantification of scoliosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS),

High Rate of Revision Surgery After Limited Decompression of Lumbar Facet Cysts.

The surgical treatment of lumbar facet cysts has long been debated. Some surgeons elect for limited decompression of such cysts while other surgeons elect for primary decompression and fusion over concerns for recurrence and instability. Previous studies have suggested the rate of revision surgery after facet cyst excision to be as low as 1%, whereas others have reported this rate to be markedly higher. In this study, we examined revision surgery rates and patient-reported outcomes and conducted a radiographic analysis to identify predictors of failure after limited decompression of lumbar facet cysts. A retrospective review of the electronic medical records of patients treated at our institution using the Current Procedural Terminology code 63267 before January 2018 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was revision surgery at the index level for recurrence or instability or a minimum 2-year follow-up without revision surgery. Secondary outcome measures include radiographic assessments of preoperative and postoperative spondylolisthesis and patient-reported outcome measures. Using preoperative MRI studies, an analysis of facet angles at the surgical level was conducted and the presence, location, and amount of facet fluid were calculated. A total of 162 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 93 patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Of these, 19 had undergone a revision surgery at the index level for cyst recurrence or instability. The revision rate for this group was 20.4%. The median time to initial revision surgery was 2.2 years. The median time from index operation to last follow-up was 3.8 years. No differences were observed between the groups regarding the presence of preoperative spondylolisthesis, age, sex, body mass index, blood loss, or patient demographics. 60.2% of all procedures were done at the L4-5 level, but this level accounted for 73.7% of primary failures. A radiographic analysis showed facet angle >45° at L4-5 to be associated with risk of failure of primary decompression. The presence and absolute amount of fluid in the facets were not associated with risk of failure at the L4-5 level. Our revision rate of 20.4% is higher than what is commonly reported in the literature. The radiographic analysis shows that at the L4-5 level, a facet angle of >45° is associated with failure of primary decompression.

Primary Decompressive Craniectomy After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Literature Review.

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) still put a high burden on public health worldwide. Medical and surgical treatment strategies are continuously being studied, but the role and indications of primary decompressive craniectomy (DC)remain controversial. In medically refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury, secondary decompressive craniectomy is a last resort treatment option to control intracranial pressure (ICP). Randomized controlled studies have been extensively performed on secondary decompressive craniectomy and its role in the management of severe traumatic brain injuries. Indications, prognostic factors, and long-term outcomes in primary decompressive craniectomy during the evacuation of an epidural, subdural, or intracerebral hematoma in the acute phase are still a matter of ongoing research and controversy to this day. Prospective trials have been designed, but the results are yet to be published. In isolated epidural hematoma without underlying brain injury, osteoplastic craniotomy is likely to be sufficient. In acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) with relevant brain swelling and preoperative CT signs such as effaced cisterns, overly proportional midline-shift compared to a relatively small acute subdural hematoma, and accompanying brain contusions as well as pupillary abnormalities, intraventricular hemorrhage, and coagulation disorder, primary decompressive craniectomy is more likely to be of benefit for patients with traumatic brain injury. The role of intracranial pressure monitoring after primary decompressive craniectomy is recommended, but prospective trials are pending. More refined guidelines and hopefully class I evidence will be established with the ongoing trials: randomized evaluation of surgery with craniectomy for patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH), prospective randomized evaluation of decompressive ipsilateral craniectomy for traumatic acute epidural hematoma (PREDICT-AEDH), and pragmatic explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS).

Single-position prone transpsoas fusion for the treatment of lumbar adjacent segment disease: early experience of twenty-four cases across three tertiary medical centers.

Prone transpsoas fusion (PTP) is a minimally invasive technique that maximizes the benefit of lateral access interbody surgery and the prone positioning for surgically significant adjacent segment disease. The authors describe the feasibility, reproducibility and radiographic efficacy of PTP when performed for cases of lumbar ASD. Adult patients undergoing PTP for treatment of lumbar ASD at three institutions were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic information was recorded, as was operative data such as adjacent segment levels, operative time, blood loss, laterality of approach, open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation and need for primary decompression. Radiographic measurements including segmental and global lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and sagittal vertical axis were recorded both pre- and immediately post-operatively. Twenty-four patients met criteria for inclusion. Average age was 60.4 ± 10.4years and average BMI was 31.6 ± 5.0kg/m2. Total operative time was 204.7 ± 83.3min with blood loss of 187.9 ± 211mL. Twenty-one patients had pedicle screw instrumentation exchanged percutaneously and 3 patients had open pedicle screw exchange. Two patients suffered pulmonary embolism that was treated medically with no long-term sequelae. One patient had transient lumbar radicular pain and all patients were discharged home with an average length of stay of 3.0days (range 1-6). Radiographically, global lumbar lordosis improved by an average of 10.3 ± 9.0 degrees, segmental lordosis by 10.1 ± 13.3 degrees and sagittal vertical axis by 3.2 ± 3.2cm. Single-position prone transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion is a clinically reproducible minimally invasive technique that can effectively treat lumbar adjacent segment disease.

Clinical outcomes following neurolysis and porcine collagen extracellular matrix wrapping of scarred nerves in revision carpal tunnel decompression

Scar tether after primary nerve decompression can impair physiological nerve glide and vascularity of the nerve. Revision decompression in the setting of neurostenalgia should address the scarred mesoneurium in order to prevent further entrapment and tether. This study reports on the clinical outcomes of 12 patients with neurostenalgia following carpal tunnel decompression (CTD), treated with revision CTD and a porcine submucosa extracellular matrix nerve wrap (PECM) (Axoguard® nerve protector, Axogen Inc., Alachua, FL). Eleven patients had one primary decompression procedure prior to revision surgery; one patient previously had two operations for CTD. There was a significant reduction in visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and improvement in patients' satisfaction rating and symptom resolution. Patient-reported outcome measures were recorded using the Impact of Hand Nerve Disorders (I-HaND) Scale (Version 2), which demonstrated a significant reduction in hand disability. There were no complications attributable to the procedure and no re-revision procedures necessary at the latest follow-up.

RPNI, TMR, and Reset Neurectomy/Relocation Nerve Grafting after Nerve Transection in Headache Surgery.

Background:In the context of headache surgery, greater occipital nerve (GON) transection is performed when the nerve appears severely damaged, if symptoms are recurrent or persistent, and when neuromas are excised. Lesser occipital nerve (LON) excision is commonly performed during the primary decompression surgery. Advanced techniques to address the proximal nerve stump after nerve transection such as regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), relocation nerve grafting, and reset neurectomy have been shown to improve chronic pain and neuroma formation. These techniques have not been described in the head and neck region.Methods:This article describes RPNI, TMR, and reset neurectomy with GON autograft relocation to prevent chronic pain and neuroma formation after GON/LON transection.Results:RPNI and TMR are feasible options in patients undergoing GON/LON transection. Further, relocation nerve grafting with GON autograft relocation is a method that is beneficial in patients with diffuse nerve injury requiring proximal nerve division.Conclusion:Advanced nerve reconstruction techniques should be considered in headache surgery following GON/LON transection.

Effect of Preoperative Opiate Use on Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Surgery

IntroductionThe prescription opioid epidemic and widespread use of narcotic medications have introduced new challenges when treating patients undergoing spine surgery. Given the ubiquity of preoperative opioid consumption amongst patients undergoing spine surgery, further research is needed to characterize perioperative risks. Our goal is to compare outcomes following primary lumbar decompression, instrumentation, and fusion based on preoperative opioid prescriptions.MethodsPatients older than 18 years of age who underwent a primary one- to two-level lumbar decompression, instrumentation, and fusion were included in the study. Patients with known malignancy, surgery involving three or more lumbar levels, current or previous use of neuromodulation, revision surgery, anterior or far lateral interbody fusions, acute fractures, or other concurrent procedures were excluded. Patients were divided into chronic opioid therapy (COT; over six months), acute opioid therapy (AOT; up to six months), and opiate-naïve groups. Opioid prescriptions, demographics, smoking status, readmission rates within one year, and reoperation rates within two years were recorded based on electronic medical record documentation.ResultsOut of 416 patients identified, 114 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients (33.3%) were on COT, 38 patients (33.3%) were on AOT, and 38 patients (33.3%) were opioid naïve preoperatively. Readmission rates within one year for COT, AOT, and opioid naïve patients were 34.2%, 26.3%, and 10.5%, respectively (p=0.047). Reoperation rates within two years for COT, AOT, and opioid naïve patients were 34.2%, 15.8%, and 13.2%, respectively (p=0.049). We also found current or former smokers were more likely to be on AOT or COT than never smokers (78.4% vs. 57.1%; p=0.017). ConclusionLong-term opiate use is associated with an increased risk for readmission within one year and revision within two years. Physicians should discuss the increased risks of readmission and revision surgery associated with lumbar decompression and fusion seen in patients on preoperative opioid therapy.

Abstract #30 Primary Decompressive Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma in a High Complexity Hospital: Tomographic Clinical Features and Outcomes

Abstract #30 Primary Decompressive Craniectomy for Acute Subdural Hematoma in a High Complexity Hospital: Tomographic Clinical Features and Outcomes

Intracranial Hypertension After Primary Decompressive Craniectomy for Head Trauma

Primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) is commonly performed for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Some, but not all patients, will benefit from invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) after surgery. We intended to identify risk factors for elevated ICP after primary DC to treat TBI. A retrospective chart review study identified all patients at our institution who underwent primary DC for TBI during the study period and who had ICP monitors placed at the time of surgery. Various preoperative and intraoperative variables were assessed for correlation with the presence of postoperative elevated ICP. Postoperative elevated ICP occurred in 36% of patients after DC. In univariate analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale <8, abnormal pupillary examination, and intraoperative brain swelling were all associated with elevated postoperative ICP. However, in multivariate analysis only intraoperative brain swelling was associated with elevated postoperative ICP (incidence 56% vs. 5%, P= 0.0043). Placement of an ICP monitor at the time of primary DC for patients with TBI should be considered if there is intraoperative brain swelling.

Peculiarities of Preoperative Planning of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Hip-Lumbar Syndrome

Summary. At present, no scheme of approach to surgical treatment of patients with hip-lumbar syndrome (HLS) depending on the type of vertical posture and the type of bone formation and progression of coxarthrosis is developed. The decision of these questions, interesting from the scientific and practical point of view, is an actual task of modern orthopedics and defines features of preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with HLS.&#x0D; Objective: to determine the features of preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty in patients with hip-lumbar syndrome.&#x0D; Materials and Methods. The basis for the development of recommendations for preoperative planning of THA in patients with HLS was the data of retrospective analysis of medical histories of 138 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Adults of SI “Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of NAMS of Ukraine”. The data of the clinical study of 506 patients with idiopathic, dysplastic and post-traumatic coxarthrosis conducted earlier were also taken into account, and the tactics of treatment in cementless hip arthroplasty was developed.&#x0D; Results. It was determined that the vertical posture affects the progression of coxarthrosis and the nature of the lesion of the lumbar spine in patients with HLS. Patients with a certain hypolordotic posture and a rapid course of coxarthrosis are recommended to undergo primary decompression of the spinal roots and THA at the second stage. In other cases, the initial implementation of THA is recommended. Recommendations for the use of the type and method of fixation and coverage of the leg of the endoprosthesis depending on the type of bone formation in the HLS of the examined patients are developed.&#x0D; Conclusions. Taking into account the features of preoperative planning of THA in patients with HLS will reduce the number of negative results and complications of this category of orthopedic patients.

Spine Surgery in the Octogenarian Population: A Comparison of Demographics, Surgical Approach, and Healthcare Utilization With the PearlDiver Database.

BackgroundWith the recent advances in technology and healthcare, increasing numbers of individuals over the age of 80 will require surgical intervention for spinal pathology. Given the risk of increased complications in the elderly, a limited number of spinal surgeries are performed on octogenarians every year. This makes it difficult to generalize the trends and outcomes of these surgeries to a greater population. This study attempts to understand the trends in the safety profile and healthcare utilization across the United States for octogenarians undergoing spinal fusion and/or decompression surgery for spinal stenosis and/or degenerative disease using the PearlDiver database.MethodologyPatients who underwent fusion and/or decompression for stenosis and/or degenerative diseases were extracted using International Classification of Disease ninth and tenth revisions (ICD-9 prior to October 2015, ICD-10 after) from 2007 to 2016 in the PearlDiver database. Three comparative groups were considered: (1) primary fusion without concurrent decompression, (2) primary decompression with concurrent fusion, and (3) fusion with concurrent decompression. Outcomes of interest were patient characteristics, demographics, length of stay, surgery hospitalization payments, and discharge disposition. These outcomes were compared to patients over the age of 20 who also underwent spinal surgery.ResultsA total of 9,715 patients who underwent spinal surgery were identified in the search. Of the 9,139 patients, 503 were octogenarians and 73 were nonagenarians. Octogenarians and nonagenarians diagnosed with spinal stenosis were more likely to undergo decompression alone rather than fusion or both fusion and decompression (21 for both fusion and decompression; p < 0.0001). Patients diagnosed with both spinal stenosis and degeneration were more likely to undergo both fusion and decompression than fusion or decompression alone (239 for both, 208 for decompression alone, and 23 for fusion alone; p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was found in the percentage of patients discharged home following either fusion or decompression or both surgeries (p = 0.0737). The mean length of stay for patients in the 20-79-year age group was 2.79 days, whereas for the octogenarian and nonagenarian cohort it was 3.85 days. The index hospitalization pay for patients in the 20-79-year age group was $19,220, whereas for the octogenarians and nonagenarians cohort it was $15,091.ConclusionsPatients over the age of 80 were more likely to undergo either a fusion procedure or a decompression procedure alone rather than both unless they were diagnosed with spinal degeneration. The PearlDiver database analysis indicates that the length of stay for octogenarians and nonagenarians is longer than that for patients in the 20-79-year age group, and that younger patients are more likely to be discharged earlier than patients over the age of 80. Moreover, we observed that the index hospitalization pay was higher for patients over the age of 20 than for octogenarians and nonagenarians in all cases except for a fusion procedure.

Random Forest–Based Prediction of Outcome and Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Primary Decompressive Craniectomy

Various prognostic models are used to predict mortality and functional outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury with a trend to incorporate machine learning protocols. None of these models is focused exactly on the subgroup of patients indicated for decompressive craniectomy. Evidence regarding efficiency of this surgery is still incomplete, especially in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy with evacuation of traumatic mass lesions. In a prospective study with a 6-month follow-up period, we assessed postoperative outcome and mortality of 40 patients who underwent primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injuries during 2018-2019. The results were analyzed in relation to a wide spectrum of preoperatively available demographic, clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data. Random forest algorithms were trained for prediction of both mortality and unfavorable outcome, with their accuracy quantified by area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) for out-of-bag samples. At the end of the follow-up period, we observed mortality of 57.5%. Favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score 4-5) was achieved by 30% of our patients. Random forest-based prediction models constructed for 6-month mortality and outcome reached a moderate predictive ability, with AUC= 0.811 and AUC= 0.873, respectively. Random forest models trained on handpicked variables showed slightly decreased AUC= 0.787 for 6-month mortality and AUC= 0.846 for 6-month outcome and increased out-of-bag error rates. Random forest algorithms show promising results in prediction of postoperative outcome and mortality in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy. The best performance was achieved by Classification Random forest for 6-month outcome.