Primary Cytoreduction Research Articles

Oncological and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ borderline ovarian tumor

Objective: To evaluate oncological and reproductive outcomes of women ≤40 years undergoing fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) for stage Ⅱ or Ⅲ borderline ovarian tumor (BOT). Methods: The patients with BOT and ≤40 years old with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ BOT who underwent FSS enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2011 and March 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data and follow-up results were obtained and analyzed. The univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were used to explore high-risk factors associated with prognosis. Additionally, pregnancy outcomes were also analyzed. Results: (1) A total of 79 patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ BOT who have been treated with FSS were conducted, with an average age of (27.5±6.7) years old. The median tumor maximum diameter were 10.4 cm (range: 4.8-90.0 cm). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage was stage Ⅱ in 45 cases and stage Ⅲ in 34 cases. According to the pathological types, there were 48 cases of serous tumor, 21 cases of mucinous tumor, 1 case of endometrioid tumor, and 9 cases of mixed types. There were 41 cases of unilateral ovarian involvement, 38 cases of bilateral ovarian involvement. There were 5 cases of microinvasion, 17 cases of micropapillary subtype. Extra-ovarian invasive implants were found in 5 cases, and there were 31 cases of merged ascites. (2) Tumor outcomes: the median follow-up time from primary cytoreduction were 58 months (range: 8-146 months). At the end of the observation period, 24 cases (30%, 24/79) recurred, among them 5 cases had two recurrences and 2 cases had three recurrences. There were 2 cases (3%, 2/79) of death and 1 case (1%, 1/79) of survival with tumor. (3) Analysis of prognostic risk factors: the results of univariate analysis showed that mucinous tumor, tumor maximum diameter >13.15 cm, FIGO stage Ⅲ, merged ascites, micropapillary subtype, invasive implantation, and bilateral ovarian involvement were independent risk factors (all P<0.05) for disease-free survival (DFS). FIGO stage Ⅲ (HR=4.555, 95%CI: 1.525-13.607; P=0.007) and micropapillary subtype (HR=2.396, 95%CI: 1.003-5.725; P=0.049) were found to be related to DFS through the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. (4) Pregnancy outcomes: among the patients with fertility intentions 36 cases (46%,36/79), 29 cases (81%, 29/36) had successful pregnancies, and 27 cases (75%, 27/36) had successful births. Conclusions: Patients with stage Ⅱ-Ⅲ BOT underwent FSS have favorable survival and pregnancy rates. Micropapillary subtypes and FIGO staging (stage Ⅲ) are the significant risk factors of DFS.

Ultra-radical surgery versus standard-radical surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; long-term tertiary center experiences

ObjectiveTo compare overall survival (OS) and morbidity outcomes in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer undergoing standard-radical (SR) and ultra-radical (UR) surgical procedures based on NICE classification. Study DesignThis retrospective study analyzed data from 282 patients with 2014 FIGO stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer operated on between January 2006 and January 2019. The study compared OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and morbidity between SR and UR surgeries. Parameters influencing OS, including preoperative, postoperative, and post-adjuvant chemotherapy CA-125 values, surgical procedures, post-surgical residual tumor, histopathological grade, and FIGO surgical stage, were assessed. ResultsOut of 282 patients, 256 met the inclusion criteria. SR surgery was performed in 48 %, and UR surgery in 52 %. The mean preoperative CA-125 value was 1200 ± 1914.83, decreasing to 240.32 ± 373.87 postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 63.01 ± 47.56 months. UR surgery correlated with significantly higher postoperative complications (p < 0.001), histopathological grade (p = 0.023), FIGO stage (p < 0.001), three-year death rates, and overall mortality rates (p = 0.035). FIGO stage and total metastatic lymph nodes emerged as independent prognostic factors for overall and PFS. ConclusionIn the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer, evaluating the extent of the tumor before the surgery and showing maximal effort to minimize the residual tumor volume instead of applying UR procedures as the first choice seems to be the most important factor that can affect survival.

Risk Prediction Model for Surgical Complications and Predictors of Delay/Omission of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Post Primary Cytoreduction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Risk Prediction Model for Surgical Complications and Predictors of Delay/Omission of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Post Primary Cytoreduction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Primary Cytoreduction and Survival for Patients With Less-Common Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Primary Cytoreduction and Survival for Patients With Less-Common Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cytoreduction as a treatment for stage III and IV ovarian cancer (literature review)

Standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (OC) consists of a combination of chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery, but practice varies depending on the order of these 2 procedures: neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery or primary cytoreduction followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of the work is to evaluate methods of treatment of OC of stages III, IV according to FIGO.The literature review includes publications in English from the PubMed, CochraneLibrary and Google Scholar databases on the use of neoadjuvant therapy and primary cytoreduction in late stages of OC (FIGO III–IV). 6 randomized controlled trials, 8 meta-analyses, 8 systematic reviews, 1 case report were identified. Data from publications were distributed according to the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the treatment: overall and relapse-free survival, perioperative complications, quality of life of patients and the grade of cytoreduction.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy + interval debulking surgery is not inferior to primary debulking surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of survival outcomes in selected patients, but treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + interval debulking surgery improves perioperative outcomes and optimal cytoreduction rates. It is needed to focus on finding optimal criteria for selecting patients in both groups in future studies of this issue. It is necessary to take into account X-ray, histological studies, the molecular subtype of the tumor, the patient’s condition, the qualifications of the surgical team, the drugs included in chemotherapy.

NMR Metabolomics of Primary Ovarian Cancer Cells in Comparison to Established Cisplatin-Resistant and -Sensitive Cell Lines.

Cancer cell lines are frequently used in metabolomics, such as in vitro tumor models. In particular, A2780 cells are commonly used as a model for ovarian cancer to evaluate the effects of drug treatment. Here, we compare the NMR metabolomics profiles of A2780 and cisplatin-resistant A2780 cells with those of cells derived from 10 patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (collected during primary cytoreduction before any chemotherapeutic treatment). Our analysis reveals a substantial similarity among all primary cells but significant differences between them and both A2780 and cisplatin-resistant A2780 cells. Notably, the patient-derived cells are closer to the resistant A2780 cells when considering the exo-metabolome, whereas they are essentially equidistant from A2780 and A2780-resistant cells in terms of the endo-metabolome. This behavior results from dissimilarities in the levels of several metabolites attributable to the differential modulation of underlying biochemical pathways. The patient-derived cells are those with the most pronounced glycolytic phenotype, whereas A2780-resistant cells mainly diverge from the others due to alterations in a few specific metabolites already known as markers of resistance.

Utility of CA-125 in interval surgery

Standard treatment for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) correlate with residual tumor burden after debulking surgery. There are situations in which it is not feasible to perform the aforementioned surgery, requiring neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with eventual interval surgery. The objective of the study was to retrospectively evaluate patients who were not plausible for primary cytoreduction, analyzing the value of CA-125 pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its suitability between these values and the surgical result.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of ovarian cancer

Key content Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at the time of cytoreductive surgery is a proposed additional treatment in the management of advanced tubo‐ovarian cancer. Additional organisational approvals, costs, changes to theatre infrastructure and pre‐, intra‐, and post‐operative management considerations are required to implement HIPEC in a clinical setting. Current meta‐analysis data suggest that in the setting of interval cytoreductive surgery, HIPEC prolongs overall survival and progression‐free survival. There is currently no evidence of benefit in the setting of primary surgery or recurrent disease, but results of ongoing clinical trials are pending. Learning objectives To understand the mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of HIPEC as an adjuvant treatment in tubo‐ovarian cancer. Ethical issues Because of variation in treatment protocols and heterogeneity of reported outcomes, HIPEC has not yet been adopted into standard practice. Further studies assessing its benefit, mainly in the setting of primary cytoreduction, are ongoing.

Oncological outcomes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: BRCA mutation role

IntroductionThe knowledge of BRCA status offers a chance to evaluate the role of the intraperitoneal route in patients selected by biomolecular profiles after primary cytoreduction surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective, multicenter study to assess oncological outcomes depending on adjuvant treatment (intraperitoneal [IP] vs intravenous [IV]) and BRCA status (BRCA1/2 mutated vs. BRCA wild type [WT]). The primary endpoint was to determine progression-free survival. The secondary objectives were overall survival and toxicity. ResultsA total of 288 women from eight centers were included: 177 in the IP arm and 111 in the IV arm, grouped into four arms according to BRCA1/2 status. Significantly better PFS was observed in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with IP chemotherapy (HR: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16–0.75, p = 0.007), which was not present in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with IV chemotherapy (HR: 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37–1.12, p = 0.14). Significantly better OS was also observed in IP chemotherapy (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06–043, p < 0.0001), but was not present in IV chemotherapy in relation with BRCA mutation (HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.22–1.27, p = 0.15). For BRCA WT patients, worse survival was observed regardless of the adjuvant route used. The IP route was more toxic compared to the IV route, but toxicity was equivalent at the long-term follow-up. ConclusionThis retrospective study suggests that BRCA status can help to offer an individualized, systematic treatment after optimal primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer, but is limited by the small sample size. Prospective trials are essential to confirm these results.

Survival outcomes of epithelial ovarian cancer treated at a tertiary-level hospital in India.

One needs to choose wisely between primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer. The aim was to determine the recurrence free survival and overall survival after surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer and also the risk factors for recurrence and death. Electronic medical records of 322 women operated for ovarian, fallopian or primary peritoneal cancer between 2011 and 2015table were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patients and their clinical outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were used for risk factor analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios were obtained for recurrence and death, adjusted for stage, primary treatment modality, residual disease and histology. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for probability of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The log rank test was used to compare survival probabilities. The majority were stage III or stage IV (78%), serous histology (71%) and high grade (64%). Primary cytoreduction was done in 48% and interval cytoreduction in 52%. The median duration of follow up (survival) was 77 months (95% CI 72-82). There were 179 known recurrences (55.6 %). The estimated median time to recurrence was 22 (95% CI 14.5- 29.5) months. The independent risk factors for recurrence were neoadjuvant chemotherapy [HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.48-3.09], stage III/IV [HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.40-5.41], high grade serous histology [HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.12-2.54] and sub-optimal debulking [HR 3.15, 95% CI 2.19-4.55]. There were 78 known deaths (24.2 %) with a mean time to death of 24.3 (SD 16.1) months. The independent risk factors for death were sub-optimal debulking [HR 3.07; 95% CI 1.78-5.29] and stages III and IV cancer [HR 3.07; 95% CI 1.14-8.27]. Most ovarian cancers recur within 2 years. Risk factors for mortality are advanced stage and sub-optimal debulking. Maximal efforts at down staging and surgical resection will increase survival.

Primary vs. interval cytoreduction for high-grade serous ovarian cancer: oncological outcomes from a retrospective study at a single tertiary referral center

Primary vs. interval cytoreduction for high-grade serous ovarian cancer: oncological outcomes from a retrospective study at a single tertiary referral center

Prognostic factors in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer: the Young Ovarian Cancer-Care (YOC-Care) study

ObjectiveTo determine oncological outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in women aged <45 years with epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was performed of patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer...

The Cukurova score in the prediction of primary cytoreduction in ovarian cancer

ObjectivePrimary debulking surgery has been the preferred surgical route and is still considered a quality indicator for advanced ovarian cancer surgery. However, a significant number of patients are not amenable...

2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundSelected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) can benefit from potentially curative cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 40 months.ObjectiveThe aims of this evidence-based consensus were to define the indications for HIPEC, to select the preferred HIPEC regimens, and to define research priorities regarding the use of HIPEC for PM-CRC.MethodsThe consensus steering committee elaborated and formulated pertinent clinical questions according to the PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) method and assessed the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Standardized evidence tables were presented to an international expert panel to reach a consensus (4-point, weak and strong positive/negative) on HIPEC regimens and research priorities through a two-round Delphi process. The consensus was defined as ≥ 50% agreement for the 4-point consensus grading or ≥ 70% for either of the two combinations.ResultsEvidence was weak or very weak for 9/10 clinical questions. In total, 70/90 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (78%), with a consensus for 10/10 questions on HIPEC regimens. There was strong negative consensus concerning the short duration, high-dose oxaliplatin (OX) protocol (55.7%), and a weak positive vote (53.8–64.3%) in favor of mitomycin-C (MMC)-based HIPEC (preferred choice: Dutch protocol: 35 mg/m2, 90 min, three fractions), both for primary cytoreduction and recurrence. Determining the role of HIPEC after CRS was considered the most important research question, regarded as essential by 85.7% of the panelists. Furthermore, over 90% of experts suggest performing HIPEC after primary and secondary CRS for recurrence > 1 year after the index surgery.ConclusionsBased on the available evidence, despite the negative results of PRODIGE 7, HIPEC could be conditionally recommended to patients with PM-CRC after CRS. While more preclinical and clinical data are eagerly awaited to harmonize the procedure further, the MMC-based Dutch protocol remains the preferred regimen after primary and secondary CRS.

Primary Cytoreductive Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Interval Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) represents about two-thirds of ovarian malignancies and usually presents with advanced disease. Primary cytoreductive (PCR) surgery is known to be the cornerstone of treatment of advanced EOC, but it might not always be feasible to obtain optimal cytoreduction. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been proposed as an alternative approach. This study aims to compare the survival of patients, post-operative morbidity and the extent of cytoreduction that was achieved among the two treatment groups. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done in Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital of Nepal. All women who underwent surgical management for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer from 2016 to 2019 were included in the study and analyzed using SPSS version 23. Results: Among 29 cases of advanced EOC, seven cases underwent PCR and 22 cases had NACT followed by interval cytoreduction (ICR). Optimal debulking was achieved in 85.7% of the cases in the PCR group and in 95.5% in the NACT+ICR group. Overall survival of &gt;3 years in the PCR group was 42.9% while in the NACT group was 59.1%. Progression free survival (PFS) of &gt;3 years was seen in 28.6% in the PCR group and in 45.5% in the NACT group. Conclusions: The current study shows that NACT followed by ICR has better survival outcomes than PCR. Despite the limitations of the study, NACT + ICR can be considered a reasonable alternative to PCR in advanced EOC.

Anti-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor encephalitis developed after ovarian cancer cytoreduction surgery: a case report and literature review

BackgroundAnti-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) encephalitis, a rare subtype of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), is often found associated with tumors such as thymoma, lung cancer, ovarian tumors, and breast cancer, and the tumors were generally detected during the screening process after the encephalitis initiated. The tumor is considered a trigger of AE, but the mechanism remains unclear.Case PresentationA 53-year-old woman presented short-term memory loss two days after the primary cytoreduction for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC, FIGO stage IC3). Cell-based assay found AMPAR CluA2 IgG positive in both serum (1:3.2) and cerebrospinal fluid (1:32). Moreover, mild AMPAR GluA1 and strong GluA2 expressions were also found positive in the paraffin sections of ovarian tumor tissue, indicating the ovarian cytoreduction surgery might stimulate the release of receptor antigens into the circulation system. The patient’s condition deteriorated within two weeks, developing consciousness and autonomic dysfunction, leading to ICU admission. With oral steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and rituximab treatment, the patient’s consciousness markedly improved after three months.ConclusionWe presented the first case of anti-AMPAR encephalitis developed right after the primary cytoreduction of a patient with HGSOC and retrieved paraneoplastic anti-AMPAR encephalitis cases (n = 66). Gynecologists should pay attention to patients who develop cognitive dysfunction or psychiatric symptoms shortly after the ovarian tumor resection and always include AE in the differentiation diagnosis.

Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OVHIPEC-1): final survival analysis of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

The OVHIPEC-1 trial previously showed that the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in improved progression-free and overall survival compared with cytoreductive surgery alone at 4·7 years of follow-up in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who were ineligible for primary cytoreduction. We report the final survival outcomes after 10 years of follow-up. In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, patients with primary epithelial stage III ovarian cancer were recruited at eight HIPEC centres in the Netherlands and Belgium. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-76 years, had not progressed during at least three cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin plus paclitaxel, had a WHO performance status score of 0-2, normal blood counts, and adequate renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) or with HIPEC (100 mg/m2 cisplatin; surgery-plus-HIPEC group). Randomisation was done centrally by minimisation with a masked web-based allocation procedure at the time of surgery when residual disease smaller than 10 mm diameter was anticipated, and was stratified by institution, previous suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, and number of abdominal regions involved. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and a secondary endpoint was overall survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00426257, and is closed. Between April 1, 2007, and April 30, 2016, 245 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 10·1 years (95% CI 8·4-12·9) in the surgery group (n=123) and 10·4 years (95% CI 9·5-13·3) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (n=122). Recurrence, progression, or death occurred in 114 (93%) patients in the surgery group (median progression-free survival 10·7 months [95% CI 9·6-12·0]) and 109 (89%) patients in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (14·3 months [12·0-18·5]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·63 [95% CI 0·48-0·83], stratified log-rank p=0·0008). Death occurred in 108 (88%) patients in the surgery group (median overall survival 33·3 months [95% CI 29·0-39·1]) and 100 (82%) patients in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group (44·9 months [95% CI 38·6-55·1]; HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·92], stratified log-rank p=0·011). These updated survival results confirm the long-term survival benefit of HIPEC in patients with primary stage III epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery. Dutch Cancer Foundation (KWF Kankerbestrijding).

Minimizing futile laparotomies at primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A feasibility study comparing management algorithms (023)

Minimizing futile laparotomies at primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: A feasibility study comparing management algorithms (023)

Analysis of olaparib efficacy in patients with serous ovarian cancer

Modern treatment of ovarian cancer is impossible without understanding the carcinogenesis and the structure of malignant epithelial ovarian tumors and carrying out molecular genetic testing for homologous recombination deficiency. The choice of maintenance therapy depends on the presence of a mutation in the BRCA1/2 genes and the HRD status of the tumor. Targeted drugs, such as bevacizumab and olaparib, are used in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The aim of the work is to determine the effectiveness of olaparib in first-line maintenance therapy and in the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrence of ovarian cancer. A retrospective study included 67 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer stages I–IV who were prescribed olaparib in first-line maintenance therapy or in maintenance therapy for the treatment of disease progression, provided a complete or partial response to platinum-containing chemotherapy in the period from 2016 to 2022. The median life expectancy of the patients receiving first-line maintenance treatment coincides with the median time to progression; only one patient died due to the progression of the disease, and the rest are alive. The median time to progression in the group of patients with maintenance therapy of relapses was 23.0 ± 1.5 months, and the median life expectancy was 24.7 ± 2.3 months. When comparing the patients of the first group, depending on the term of surgical treatment performed, the median life expectancy was statistically higher with primary cytoreduction and constituted 46.0 months, while in the interval cytoreduction group, it was 25.0 months (p = 0.018). When comparing the patients of the second group, depending on the mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the median life expectancy was statistically higher in the patients with a mutation in the BRCA2 gene — by 38.6 months (p = 0.020). The addition of olaparib to the treatment of BRCA-associated ovarian cancer in first-line maintenance therapy and in the treatment of platinum-sensitive relapses of the disease makes it possible to increase the median time to progression and median life expectancy.

Endometriosis in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma ovary: its impact on clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.

Malignant transformation in endometriosis was first described by Sampson in 1925. There is now sufficient evidence of its association specifically with endometrioid (EOC) and clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC). Whether endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) is a distinct clinicopathological entity from non-endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (NEAOC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the impact of endometriosis on clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in EOC and CCOC. This is a retrospective single-institution analysis of patients diagnosed with CCOC AND EOC between 2010 and 2021. Demographic and clinical presentation data were obtained from medical records. Patients were followed up till March 2023. Statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS Statistics 20 Windows. Of the 77 cases of CCOC and EOC ovary, 38 had histopathologically proven endometriosis. There was no difference in age (51.62 and 50.05 years, respectively), body mass index, parity, menopausal status and CA 125 levels at presentation. Ascites was more frequent in the absence of endometriosis (30% versus 8.1%, p = 0.015). However, this did not translate to a statistical difference in the stage, with the majority presenting in the early stage. (94% versus 83%). All 78 patients underwent primary cytoreduction with equal rates of optimal resection.There was no difference in the mean disease-free interval between EAOC and NEAOC (107.6 and 109.4 months, p 0.484). Recurrences were predominantly pelvic in both groups. The disease-specific survival was 111.7 and 120.1 months, respectively, with and without endometriosis. This was however not statistically significant (p 0.751). In the Indian population, endometriosis did not have any impact on the age at presentation, CA 125 levels, stage of the disease and survival outcomes in EOC and CCOC ovary.