Primary Cesarean Delivery Research Articles

THE EFFECT OF PRIMARY AND REPEATED CESAREAN BIRTH ON BREASTFEEDING SUCCESS AND MATERNAL ATTACHMENT LEVEL IN POSTPARTUM: A CROSS-SECTIONAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDY

This research was conducted to determine the effect of primary and repeated cesarean births on breastfeeding success and maternal attachment level in postpartum women. The cross-sectional and comparative study sample consisted of 322 postpartum women who applied to a public hospital in eastern Turkey. Data were collected with the "Personal Information Form", "LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment Tool" and “Maternal Attachment Scale(MAS)". Descriptive statistics, independent group’s t-test, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. The average age of the puerperants with primary and repeat births was determined as 28.14±6.15, and 30.56±4.91, respectively. The mean LATCH and MAS total scores of postpartum women who had primary cesarean delivery were lower than those of postpartum women who had repeated cesarean delivery, and the difference between them was statistically significant(p=0.000). It was found that there was a weak, positive relationship between the MAS and LATCH score averages of women who had primary and repeated cesarean deliveries, and as breastfeeding success increased, the level of attachment also increased. It was concluded that breastfeeding success and attachment levels were lower in primary cesarean births compared to repeated cesarean births, and as the breastfeeding success achieved in both groups increased, the level of attachment increased.

6900 Fetal Abdominal Obesity in Women Exhibiting One Abnormal Value on Diagnostic Testing for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract Disclosure: W. Kim: None. S. Park: None. Y. Kim: None. Background: Fetal abdominal obesity (FAO) was already observed at the time of diagnosis of GDM in our previous study. We investigated whether fetuses of women with hyperglycemia milder than GDM showed accelerated abdominal growth, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7,569 singleton pregnant women who were universally screened using a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) and underwent a 3-h 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) if GCT result was ≥140mg/dL. GDM, one value abnormality (OVA), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT, NGT1: GCT negative, NGT2: GCT positive & OGTT negative) were diagnosed using Carpenter-Coustan criteria. With fetal biometry data measured simultaneously with 50-g GCT, relative fetal abdominal overgrowth was investigated by assessing the fetal abdominal overgrowth ratios (FAORs) of the ultrasonographically estimated gestational age (GA) of abdominal circumference(AC) per actual GA by the last menstruation period(LMP), biparietal diameter (BPD) or femur length(FL), respectively. FAO was defined as FAOR ≥90th percentile Results: The FAORs of GA-AC/GA-LMP and GA-AC/GA-BPD were significantly higher in OVA subjects compared to NGT subjects but not in NGT2 subjects. Although the frequency of FAO in OVA (12.1%) was between that of NGT (9.6%) and GDM (18.3%) without statistically significant difference, the prevalence of large for gestational age at birth and primary cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher in OVA (9.8% and 29.7%) than in NGT (5.1% and 21.5%, p<0.05). Particularly, among OVA subjects with FAO, the prevalence (33.3% and 66.7%) was significantly higher than in those without FAO (9.7% and 24.2%, p<0.05). Conclusion: The degree of fetal abdominal growth acceleration in OVA subjects was intermediate between that of NGT and GDM subjects. OVA subjects with FAO at the time of GDM diagnosis were strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Presentation: 6/2/2024

The impact of indication for cesarean on blood loss

BackgroundPostpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Quantitative blood loss assessment at the time of cesarean delivery is a more accurate measure of blood loss than is simple estimation. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage are well described; however, contemporary, systematic investigations into the impact of the indication for cesarean delivery on quantitative blood loss are lacking. ObjectiveTo investigate whether there are clinically significant differences in quantitative blood loss and postpartum hemorrhage risk based on the indication for cesarean delivery. Study DesignA cohort of 4,881 cesarean deliveries performed at a large academic hospital between 2020 and 2022 was identified. Primary and repeat cesarean deliveries were analyzed separately and further subdivided into seven indications: elective, labor arrest, fetal heart rate abnormalities, placenta previa, placenta accreta, malpresentation, and other. Quantitative blood loss and rates of postpartum hemorrhage ( > 1000 cc and >1500cc) were compared among the different indications. ResultsMean quantitative blood loss for primary, repeat and total cesarean deliveries was 886 cc, 697 cc and 792 cc, respectively. Excluding cases of placenta accreta, the greatest blood loss in both primary and repeat groups was seen in cesareans performed for labor arrest, with blood loss exceeding 1500 cc in 18% and 13% of all cases. Blood loss exceeding 1500cc was seen in 1% and 2% of elective cesarean deliveries. The mean blood loss for planned repeat cesarean/hysterectomies for placenta accreta was < 400cc greater than primary cesareans performed for labor arrest (1442 cc vs. 1065 cc), despite the addition of an often-complex hysterectomy to the procedure. ConclusionsClinically and statistically significant differences in blood loss exist based on the indication for cesarean delivery. Large differences in rates of serious postpartum hemorrhage (>1500cc) with negligible differences in mean quantitative blood loss suggests the presence of frequent, large clinical outliers not reflected in a statistical mean. The indication for cesarean and the possibility of such outliers, rather than the predicted “average blood loss for cesarean delivery” should be considered in determining risk and the degree of necessary pre-operative blood preparation. These data raise questions about whether current, traditional techniques of non-accreta related cesarean delivery can be justified in non-emergent cases when such procedures could be performed with significantly less blood loss using accreta-specific techniques.

Gene expression profiles in placenta and their association with anesthesia, delivery mode and maternal diabetes

IntroductionFetal development is dependent on placenta and affected by multiple factors including maternal diabetes. Here we aimed to identify maternal diabetes-associated changes in placentas and analyzed placental gene expression to understand its modulation by maternal diabetes and birth mode. MethodsPlacental RNAseq transcriptome analyses were performed on maternally-derived decidua and fetal-derived villous tissue from pregnancies of mothers with type 1 diabetes (n=14), gestational diabetes (n=6) and without diabetes (n=14). Information on delivery mode and anesthesia were included as covariables. Analyses were performed separately for decidua and fetal tissues and adjusted for sex. ResultsSubstantial placenta gene expression variation was associated with factors other than maternal diabetes, including site, sex, anesthesia type and delivery mode. Two dominant gene expression clusters aligned to anesthesia and delivery mode were observed for decidua and villous tissue. Upregulation of genes within pathways related to organ morphogenesis and downregulation of immune response to steroid- and hypoxia pathway genes was characteristic of placentas from primary cesarean section deliveries with spinal anesthesia. Opposite profiles were observed for placentas from secondary cesarean and epidural anesthesia deliveries. Placentas from vaginal delivery had intermediate gene expression profiles. More subtle changes were associated with maternal diabetes: upregulation of ribosome activity, down-regulation of maternally-derived decidua chemokine signaling pathways and for gestational diabetes, alteration in hypoxia response genes. DiscussionThe findings reveal suppression of immune pathways and upregulation of ribosome activity in the placenta by maternal diabetes highlighting the importance of confounding factors when examining cell and tissue expression profiles. Further studies should determine whether the observed gene expression differences are related to underlying causes for cesarean section deliveries.

False-Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Test Results With Rapid Seroreversion After Third-Trimester Tdap Booster Vaccination.

False-positive and false-negative results in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing are expected at some frequency. False-positive results have been reported in association with various conditions, including pregnancy, autoimmune disease, and infection. We present an atypical case of a pregnant patient receiving false-positive HIV results for both screening and antibody confirmatory tests after a recent routine vaccination. A 34-year-old woman, G4P1021, with a negative first-trimester HIV test result received a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster at 35 2/7 weeks of gestation. Test results at 36 2/7 weeks of gestation were positive in both HIV-1/2 antigen-antibody screening and a confirmatory HIV-1 antibody differentiation immunoassay, but follow-up test results at 36 5/7 weeks and later were negative. Repeat testing and erythrocyte typing confirmed that this was not a result of laboratory error or specimen mishandling. HIV antiretroviral therapy was started and was later discontinued. A scheduled primary cesarean delivery performed at 39 1/7 weeks of gestation due to breech presentation was uncomplicated. False-positive results in HIV screen and confirmation testing were associated with receipt of a Tdap vaccine booster 7 days prior. This test result pattern is similar to that seen very rarely in previous cases, and the rapid seroreversion to negative suggests an acute immunologic trigger leading to a falsely reactive antibody. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for false-positive HIV test results in patients who recently received vaccination or with other immune triggers and retest at a short interval if suspected.

Blood pressure control in pregnant patients with chronic hypertension and diabetes: should

BackgroundThe Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study (CHAP) demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure (BP) <130/80 mm Hg. ObjectiveWe compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved BP <130/80 versus 130-139/80-89 mm Hg. Study DesignThis was a secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks’ gestation and at least two recorded BP measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic BP were calculated using ambulatory antenatal BPs. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and small for gestational age (SGA). Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic BP <130 mm Hg and average diastolic BP <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130-139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80-89 mm Hg using Student’s t-test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates. ResultsOf 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed DM prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61, p<0.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (aRR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.79). The risk of NICU admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (aRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (aRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.12-2.92). SGA less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (aRR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.96). ConclusionIn those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes.

Family Medicine Presence on Labor and Delivery: Effect on Safety Culture and Cesarean Delivery.

Currently, 40% of counties in the United States do not have an obstetrician or midwife, and in rural areas the likelihood of childbirth being attended to by a family medicine (FM) physician is increasing. We sought to characterize the effect of the FM presence on unit culture and a key perinatal quality metric in Iowa hospital intrapartum units. Using a cross-sectional design, we surveyed Iowa physicians, nurses, and midwives delivering intrapartum care at hospitals participating in a quality improvement initiative to decrease the incidence of cesarean delivery. We linked respondents with their hospital characteristics and outcomes data. The primary outcome was the association between FM physician, obstetrician (OB), or both disciplines' presence on labor and delivery and hospital low-risk, primary cesarean delivery rate. Unit culture was compared by hospital type (FM-only, OB-only, or Both). A total of 849 clinicians from 39 hospitals completed the survey; 13 FM-only, 11 OB-only, and 15 hospitals with both. FM-only hospitals were all rural, with <1,000 annual births. Among hospitals with <1,000 annual births, births at FM-only hospitals had an adjusted 34.3% lower risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted incident rate ratio = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-.0.98) compared with hospitals with both. Nurses endorsed unit norms more supportive of vaginal birth and stronger safety culture at FM-only hospitals (P <.05). Birthing hospitals staffed exclusively by FM physicians were more likely to have lower cesarean rates and stronger nursing-rated safety culture. Both access and quality of care provide strong arguments for reinforcing the pipeline of FM physicians training in intrapartum care.

Pregnancy outcomes and fertility after ligation of uterine artery only and hypogastric artery only in postpartum hemorrhage.

To determine and compare pregnancy outcomes after bilateral uterine artery ligation (BUAL) or bilateral hypogastric artery ligation (BHAL) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2018 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients who had undergone arterial ligation for PPH were included in the study. Patients who had undergone BUAL and BHAL were compared with a control group in terms of fertility and pregnancy outcomes. A total of 156 patients were included, of whom 47 underwent BUAl, 59 underwent BHAL and 50 were in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups in subsequent pregnancies in terms of the incidence of miscarriage, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, primary cesarean deliveries, and infertility (p>0.05). There was a significant difference between all groups in gestational age at birth and birthweight. Preterm birth was observed in 32.2% of patients in the BHAL group, and this rate was significantly higher than in the BUAL (12.8%) and control (6%) groups (p=0.001). PPH is a life-threatening obstetric problem. The effects of interventions performed to reduce pelvic blood flow in patients may lead to persistent problems, such as preterm birth and low birth weight in the next pregnancy. However, these interventions do not appear to affect the risk of miscarriage. In subsequent pregnancies of patients who received BHAL, special attention should be paid to preterm birth.

Umbilical Artery Doppler and Adverse Outcomes in Severe Preeclampsia Without Fetal Growth Restriction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and objective Severe preeclampsia may be managed expectantly before 34 weeks gestation with close surveillance.Utilized in fetal growth restriction (FGR), evidence supports umbilical artery (UA) Dopplerpreventing neonatal morbidity from hypertensive disease and predicting adverse outcomes in preeclampsia. We evaluated the association of abnormal UA Doppler waveforms with early delivery (before 34 weeks gestation) and adverse maternal-fetal outcomes in patients with early severe preeclampsia without FGR. Methodology This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Ninth or Tenth Revision, defined severe preeclampsia diagnosed before 34 weeks gestation without FGR from January 1, 2018, through January 27, 2023, at a large tertiary care center where S/D ratios were calculated from UA Doppler interrogation of a free loop of cord at least once weekly. This study was approved by the IRB (ID:00002216) and granted a full Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) waiver of consent. Exclusion criteria were major congenital anomalies, congenital infection, aneuploidy, leaving against medical advice >24 hours, and patient instability on admission defined as condition(s) precluding expectant management by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The primary outcome was delivery before 34 weeks gestation. Secondary outcomes were the mode of delivery and maternal/fetal complications. Patient characteristics and outcomes for normal versus abnormal UA Doppler groups were compared with chi-square, t-tests, and Fisher's exact test. Odds ratios and relative risks were calculated to compare outcomes. Results Of 194 patients with severe preeclampsia, 107 met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four patients had abnormal UA Doppler studies. There were no differences in demographic and clinical data between patients with normal and abnormal UA Doppler studies. Patients with abnormal UA Doppler studies were more likely to deliver before 34 weeks (OR=3.91; 95%CI 1.24-12.33) for worsening severe features (OR=3.85; 95% CI 1.42-10.41), and were less likely to deliver vaginally (OR=0.12; 95% CI 0.03-0.54). Abnormal UA Doppler studies were associatedwith an increased risk of neonatal complications (OR=6.46; 95% CI 1.42-29.42) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (OR=4.75; 95%CI 1.32-17.16). Abnormal UA Doppler subgroups were divided into patients with elevated S/D >95% Acharya (N=22) and absent end-diastolic flow (EDF) (N=10). The elevated S/D group tended to deliver before 34 weeks gestation for worsening severe features (OR=3.71, 95% CI 1.144-12.050) and had a higher risk of neonatal complications (RR 1.404; 95% CI 1.213-1.624). The absent EDF subgroup was more likely to deliver before 34 weeks (RR=1.52; 95%CI 1.29-1.79) for abnormal fetal testing (OR=6.92; 95%CI 1.71-28.08) and undergo primary cesarean delivery (OR=7.23; 95%CI 1.43-36.61). Conclusion Pregnancies with severe preeclampsia without FGR displayed a high incidence of abnormal UA Doppler waveforms associated with loss of clinical stability and adverse fetal outcomes. The groups with more impedance to umbilical artery flow tended to deliver earlier, and as the Doppler shifted from elevated S/D to absent end-diastolic flow, the mode of delivery shifted to cesarean delivery with increased risk of abnormal fetal testing. These results support the utility of UA Doppler surveillance in severe preeclampsia.

Third-Trimester Ultrasound Diagnosis of Large for Gestational Age and Risk of Cesarean Delivery.

Determine if knowledge of a third-trimester ultrasound diagnosis of large for gestational age (LGA) independently increases the risk of cesarean delivery (CD). Historical cohort comparing CD rate among patients diagnosed with an LGA fetus on a clinically indicated ultrasound from January 2017 to July 2021 with those without an LGA diagnosis at 34 weeks or later. LGA was defined as an ultrasound-estimated fetal weight greater than or equal to the 90th percentile for the gestational age. Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant confounding variables and was utilized as covariates for binary regression with CD rate as the primary outcome, and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Nulliparous term singleton vertex (NTSV) and multiparous CD rates were also compared. There were 447 patients diagnosed with an LGA fetus and 1971 patients without an LGA diagnosis on third-trimester ultrasound. The positive predictive value of LGA diagnosis was 50.1% and the false positive rate was 10.6%. Patients with a diagnosis of LGA had higher AOR of CD (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.56-2.83), and higher AOR of NTSV CD (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.14-3.13) compared with those without an LGA diagnosis. There was no difference in the rates of non-medically indicated CD, multiparous primary CD, and attempted and successful TOLAC. Our results suggest third-trimester ultrasound diagnosis of LGA independently increases odds of CD, specifically among nulliparous patients, and the potential bias may be one factor contributing to excessive CDs and NTSV CDs.

Rural-urban and racial differences in cesarean deliveries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina

ProblemUnnecessary cesarean delivery increases the risk of complications for birthing people and infants. BackgroundExamining the intersectionality of rural and racial disparities in low-risk cesarean delivery is necessary to improve equity in quality obstetrics care. AimTo evaluate rural and racial/ethnic differences in Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV) and primary cesarean delivery rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used birth certificates linked to all-payer hospital discharge data for South Carolina childbirths from 2018 to 2021. Multilevel logistic regressions examined differences in cesarean outcomes by rural/urban hospital location and race/ethnicity of birthing people during pre-pandemic (January 2018–February 2020) and peri-pandemic periods (March 2020–December 2021), adjusting for maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics among two low-risk pregnancy cohorts: 1) Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex (NTSV, n = 65,974) and 2) those without prior cesarean (primary, n = 167,928). FindingsBlack vs. White disparities remained for NTSV cesarean in adjusted models (urban pre-pandemic aOR = 1.34, 95 %CI 1.23–1.46) but were not significantly different for primary cesarean, apart from rural settings peri-pandemic (aOR = 0.87, 95 %CI 0.79–0.96). Hispanic individuals had higher adjusted odds of NTSV cesarean only for rural settings pre-pandemic (aOR = 1.28, 95 %CI 1.05–1.56), but this disparity was not significant during the pandemic (aOR = 1.13, 95 %CI 0.93–1.37). Discussion and conclusionObserved rural and racial/ethnic disparities in cesarean delivery outcomes were present before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Strategies effective in reducing racial disparities in primary cesarean may be useful in also reducing Black vs. White NTSV cesarean disparities.

Regional disparities in primary cesarean delivery rates in Japan: the role of obstetrician availability

BackgroundThe prevalence of cesarean section procedures is on the rise worldwide, necessitating a deeper understanding of the factors driving this trend to mitigate potential adverse consequences associated with unnecessary cesarean section deliveries. ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the rate of primary cesarean deliveries (PCD), a potential key indicator of obstetric care quality. Study DesignA national retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing extensive data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan spanning the years 2012 to 2018. The study examined the temporal trends in PCD rates and the indications for these procedures across different prefectures. Additionally, the study employed the obstetrician disproportionality index, as published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, to assess the influence of obstetrician availability on PCD rates. ResultsThroughout the study period from 2012 to 2018, the rate of PCD in Japan remained relatively stable at approximately 14%. The primary indications for PCD in 2018 included labor arrest (18.3%), malpresentation (16.5%), nonreassuring fetal status (6.5%), and macrosomia (6.0%). Substantial regional disparities in PCD rates were observed, ranging from 8.9% to 20.4% among prefectures in 2018. Notably, prefectures categorized in the bottom 10 of the obstetrician disproportionality index exhibited significantly higher PCD rates compared to the top 10 prefectures (P=.0232), with a similar trend noted for PCD due to labor arrest (P=.0288). Furthermore, a negative correlation was identified between the obstetrician disproportionality index and PCD rates at the prefectural level (r=–0.3119, P=.0328). ConclusionsOur study presents a comprehensive analysis of PCD rates in Japan, shedding light on regional disparities and highlighting the notable influence of obstetrician availability on clinical decision-making. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on the escalating global trend in cesarean sections and the importance of healthcare resource allocation in maternal care.

Postoperative analgesic consumption for primary versus first repeat Cesarean delivery: a historical cohort study.

It is unclear if postoperative pain experience and opioid consumption differ in patients undergoing primary vs repeat Cesarean delivery (CD) as prior studies have yielded conflicting results and none used the same patients as their own controls. We sought to compareopioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing both a primary and a first repeat CD, using the same patients as their own controls. We conducted a single-centre historical cohort study of patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD under neuraxial anesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 30 November 2022. The same standardized multimodal analgesic regimen was used for all patients. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME) at 48hr after surgery. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve for pain scores at 24 and 48hr, and opioid consumption at 24hr. We included 409 patients. In unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences between primary and repeat CD in median [interquartile range] opioid consumption at 48hr (45 [15-89] mg vs 45 [15-83] mg OME) or in any of the secondary outcomes. In the multivariable model adjusting for age, body mass index, anxiety, depression, priority, surgery duration, gestational age, receipt of postoperative ketorolac, and neuraxial type, repeat CD was still not associated with increased opioid consumption compared with primary CD (adjusted rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). In this retrospective study, we found no differences in postoperative opioid consumption or reported pain scores in patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD.

Fetal abdominal obesity in women with one value abnormality on diagnostic test for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Previous studies have shown that fetal abdominal obesity (FAO) was already observed at the time of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis and persisted until delivery despite management in older and/or obese women. In this study, we investigated whether fetuses of women with milder hyperglycemia than GDM have accelerated abdominal growth, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7,569 singleton pregnant women who were universally screened using a 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) and underwent a 3-h 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) if GCT result was ≥140mg/dL. GDM, one value abnormality (OVA), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT, NGT1: GCT negative, NGT2: GCT positive & OGTT negative) were diagnosed using Carpenter-Coustan criteria. With fetal biometry data measured simultaneously with 50-g GCT, relative fetal abdominal overgrowth was investigated by assessing the fetal abdominal overgrowth ratios (FAORs) of the ultrasonographically estimated gestational age (GA) of abdominal circumference(AC) per actual GA by the last menstruation period(LMP), biparietal diameter(BPD) or femur length(FL), respectively. FAO was defined as FAOR ≥90th percentile The FAORs of GA-AC/GA-LMP and GA-AC/GA-BPD were significantly higher in OVA subjects compared to NGT subjects but not in NGT2 subjects. Although the frequency of FAO in OVA (12.1%) was between that of NGT (9.6%) and GDM (18.3%) without statistically significant difference, the prevalence of large for gestational age at birth and primary cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher in OVA (9.8% and 29.7%) than in NGT (5.1% and 21.5%, p<0.05). Particularly, among OVA subjects with FAO, the prevalence (33.3% and 66.7%) was significantly higher than in those without FAO (9.7% and 24.2%, p<0.05). The degree of fetal abdominal growth acceleration in OVA subjects was intermediate between that of NGT and GDM subjects. OVA subjects with FAO at the time of GDM diagnosis were strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries: A registry-based study from Qatar.

Cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity compared to vaginal delivery, particularly in cases classified as emergency procedures or when there are multiple CDs. This retrospective cohort study aims to examine the incidence of maternal and neonatal complications in women with multiple CDs. This study used data from a national perinatal database obtained from a single tertiary maternity care hospital. Women who delivered a singleton live birth after 24 weeks of gestation by CD were stratified into five groups based on the number of CDs, with the last group having five or more CDs. The women were divided into those with five or more CDs (Group 5) versus those with fewer than five (Groups 1 to 4). The maternal outcomes included intra-operative surgical complications, blood loss, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The neonatal outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal ICU (NICU) admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and perinatal death. Of the 6,316 women in the study, 2,608 (41.3%) had a primary CD. 30.3%, 17.5%, and 7.3% of the cohort had their second, third, and fourth CDs, respectively. Women undergoing the 5th CD and above formed the remaining 3.5% (227). Women in Group 5 had the highest risk of suffering a surgical complication (3.1%, p=0.015) and postpartum hemorrhage (7.5%, p=0.010). 24% of babies in Group 5 were born preterm (p<0.001). They also had a 3.5 times higher risk of having a surgical complication (RR=3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.6, p=0.002), a 1.8 times higher risk of developing postpartum hemorrhage (RR=1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9, p=0.014), a 1.7 times higher risk of delivering between 32-37 weeks of gestation (RR=1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2, p<0.001), a higher risk of the baby getting admitted to NICU (RR=1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, p=0.038), and developing RDS (RR=1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p=0.002) compared to Groups 1-4. The risks of neonatal outcomes such as NICU admission (RR 2.9, 95% CI 2.1-4.0) and RDS (RR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3-5.5) were much higher in elective CDs performed at term compared to preterm births (p<0.001 for both). Maternal morbidity significantly increases with the increasing number of CD. The increased risk of RDS and NICU admissions in the neonate with multiple CDs reflects lower gestational age and birthweight in these groups-consideration of preoperative steroids for lung maturation in these women to reduce neonatal morbidity warrants further discussion.

What's in a Name? Provider Type and Delivery Outcomes for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Pregnancies in an Urban Hospital [ID 2683515

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have compared the rates of cesarean section of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) pregnancies between those managed by physicians and those managed by midwives. Our aim was to compare those rates and to determine whether there were any associated differences in neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of NTSV pregnancies at an urban hospital over 3 months. Two groups were compared: patients who were managed by physicians and those managed by midwives. Our primary outcome was the rate of primary cesarean delivery for each group. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared using a χ2 analysis for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables, with significance being alpha &lt;.05. Our study was approved by the Maimonides IRB. RESULTS: Between January and March 2023, there were 315 NTSV deliveries. Of these, 230 (73%) were admitted by physicians and 85 by certified nurse-midwives (27%). The NTSV patients admitted and managed by physicians were significantly more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (30.9% versus 16.5%; P=.01). This trend remains significant (P=.04) when adjusted for high-risk maternal comorbidities (ie, diabetes, hypertension, and maternal body mass index). There were no significant differences of neonatal outcomes between physician and midwives groups in Apgar scores (1 minute P=.43, 5 minutes P=.19), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (P=.84), or NICU stay length (P=.89). CONCLUSION: The NTSV pregnancies managed by midwives resulted in fewer cesarean deliveries with similar neonatal outcomes. Further investigation is needed to assess causes of the difference between provider types and to develop interventions to address the discrepancy.

Obstetrics and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with beta-blocker treatment in maternal arrhythmia

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the pregnancy prognosis of patients taking beta-blockers for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.&#x0D; Materials and Method: This study was a retrospective observational study involving 50 pregnant women with cardiac arrhythmias and 55 healthy pregnant women, admitted between January 1, 2020 and January 1, 2022, to Ankara City Hospital. Beta-blockers were classified into three groups: metaprolol, propranolol, and bisoprolol. The use of beta-blockers was examined in two groups: high-dose and low-dose. For pregnancy outcome, birth week, birth weight and birth weight Z-score, the bHCG MoM and PAPP-A MoM, neonatal APGAR score, and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates were determined. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were both used to evaluate normality of variables. Groups were compared using the Student t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. P-values &lt; 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.&#x0D; Results: The patient group taking beta-blockers had a statistically significant earlier delivery week than the group without beta-blocker use (p=0.000). The rate of primary cesarean deliveries was higher in the study group (p=0.007). Birth weight and APGAR score at the fifth minute was significantly lower in the study group, and NICU admission rate was significantly higher (p=0.006, p=0.000 and p=0.000, respectively). &#x0D; Conclusion: Beta-blockers, a first-line therapy for maternal arrhythmias, may affect fetal development and pregnancy outcomes. İt is recommended that these drugs to be administered are meticulously selected for appropriate subgroups, with lowest effective doses

The association between unintended hysterotomy extensions with cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth

BackgroundAn increased risk of preterm birth has been observed among individuals with a previous second stage cesarean delivery compared with a previous vaginal delivery. One mechanism that may contribute to the increased risk of preterm birth following second stage cesarean delivery is the increased risk of cervical injury due to extension of the uterine incision (hysterotomy) into the cervix. Investigating the contribution of hysterotomy extension to the rate of preterm birth has not been well-studied and may shed light on the mechanisms underlying the observed relationship between mode of delivery and subsequent preterm birth. ObjectiveWe aimed to quantify the association between unintended hysterotomy extension and preterm birth in a subsequent delivery. Study designWe performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic perinatal data collected in two university-affiliated obstetrical centers. The study included patients with a primary cesarean delivery of a term, singleton live birth and a subsequent singleton birth in the same catchment (2005-2021). The primary outcome was subsequent preterm birth <37 weeks; secondary outcomes included subsequent preterm birth <34, <32 and <28 weeks. We assessed crude and adjusted associations between unintended hysterotomy extensions and subsequent preterm birth with log binomial regression models using rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adjusted models included several characteristics of the primary cesarean delivery such as maternal age, length of active labour, indication for cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, and maternal comorbidity. ResultsA total 4,797 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The overall rate of unintended hysterotomy extension in the primary cesarean delivery was 6.0% and the total rate of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was 4.8%. Patients with an unintended hysterotomy extension were more likely to have a longer duration of active labour, chorioamnionitis, failed vacuum delivery attempt, second stage cesarean delivery, and persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head in the primary cesarean delivery and higher rates of smoking in the subsequent pregnancy. Multivariable analyses controlling for several confounders showed that a history of hysterotomy extension is not associated with a higher risk of preterm birth <37 weeks gestation (adjusted RR 1.55, 95% CI 0.98-2.47), but is associated with preterm birth <34 weeks gestation (adjusted RR 2.49, 95% CI 1.06-5.42). ConclusionPatients with a uterine incision extension have a 2.5 times higher rate of preterm birth <34 weeks compared with patients who do not sustain this injury. This association was not observed for preterm birth <37 weeks. Future research should aim to replicate our analyses while incorporating additional data to minimize the potential for residual confounding.

Obstetric outcomes of nulliparous women with pelvic pain undergoing fertility treatment

Research QuestionTo evaluate the association between pelvic pain disorders and primary caesarean delivery for patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. DesignRetrospective cohort study of nulliparous patients with singleton pregnancies who underwent assisted reproductive technology treatment and achieved a live birth from 2012-2020. Cases included patients with prior diagnoses of pelvic pain disorders. A 3:1 ratio propensity score matched population of patients without pelvic pain was included as Controls. Comparative statistics were performed using chi-square and students t-test. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between pelvic pain patients and mode of delivery. Results174 pelvic pain patients were compared to 575 controls. Pelvic pain patients reported a significantly longer duration of infertility (18.9±20 months vs. 14.0±14 months, p=0.003) compared to controls. Pelvic pain patients had a significantly higher rate of anxiety disorders (115±21.9 vs. 55±31.6, p= 0.009) and use of anxiolytics at embryo transfer (17±3.2 vs. 12±6.9, p=0.03). Pelvic pain patients had a higher rate of primary caesarean delivery compared with controls (59.7% vs. 49.1%, p=0.01). After adjusting for multiple variables, there was a significant association between pelvic pain patients and increased odds of primary caesarean delivery (aOR = 1.48, CI 95%; 1.02-2.1). ConclusionPelvic pain patients have significantly greater odds of primary caesarean delivery when compared to patients without pelvic pain history. The infertility outpatient setting may be uniquely positioned to identify patients at risk for undergoing primary caesarean delivery and could facilitate earlier intervention for pelvic floor physical therapy during the preconception and antepartum periods.

Impact of timing of delivery for type 2 diabetes on perinatal outcomes

AimsTo compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had scheduled delivery at full term (≥ 39 0/7 weeks) compared to early term (37 0/7 – 38 6/7 weeks) for T2DM indications. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that included all singletons with T2DM with a scheduled delivery at a single tertiary care center between January 2008 and March 2022. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test. Results107 singleton pregnancies were included. There was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery between the two groups. The early term group had significantly higher rates of NICU admission compared to the term group (52% vs 32%, p = 0.05, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.0), a finding that remained statistically significant on adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.04–7.58). ConclusionsIn singleton pregnancies undergoing scheduled delivery for T2DM-specific indications, early term deliveries were associated with significantly increased odds of NICU admission when compared to term deliveries, even after adjusting for surrogate markers of glycemic control. These findings suggest that early term delivery contributes to risk of NICU admission, rather than the indication for delivery itself. These findings should be replicated in a larger cohort.