Primary Care Research Network Research Articles

Use of the FallAkte Plus System as an IT Infrastructure for the North Rhine-Westphalian General Practice Research Network: Mixed Methods Usability Study.

Primary care research networks can generate important information in the setting where most patients are seen and treated. However, this requires a suitable IT infrastructure (ITI), which the North Rhine-Westphalian general practice research network is looking to implement. This mixed methods research study aims to evaluate (study 1) requirements for an ITI and (study 2) the usability of an IT solution already available on the market, the FallAkte Plus (FA+) system for the North Rhine-Westphalian general practice research network, which comprises 8 primary care university institutes in Germany's largest state. In study 1, a survey was conducted among researchers from the institutes to identify the requirements for a suitable ITI. The questionnaire consisted of standardized questions with open-ended responses. In study 2, a mixed method approach combining a think-aloud approach and a quantitative survey was used to evaluate the usability and acceptance of the FA+ system among 3 user groups: researchers, general practitioners, and practice assistants. Respondents were asked to assess the usability with the validated system usability scale and to test a short questionnaire on vaccination management through FA+. In study 1, five of 8 institutes participated in the requirements survey. A total of 32 user requirements related primarily to study management were identified, including data entry, data storage, and user access management. In study 2, a total of 36 participants (24 researchers and 12 general practitioners or practice assistants) were surveyed in the mixed methods study of an already existing IT solution. The tutorial video and handouts explaining how to use the FA+ system were well received. Researchers, unlike practice personnel, were concerned about data security and data protection regarding the system's emergency feature, which enables access to all patient data. The median overall system usability scale rating was 60 (IQR 33.0-85.0), whereby practice personnel (median 82, IQR 58.0-94.0) assigned higher ratings than researchers (median 44, IQR 14.0-61.5). Users appreciated the option to integrate data from practices and other health care facilities. However, they voted against the use of the FA+ system due to a lack of support for various study formats. Usability assessments vary markedly by professional group and role. In its current stage of development, the FA+ system does not fully meet the requirements for a suitable ITI. Improvements in the user interface, performance, interoperability, security, and advanced features are necessary to make it more effective and user-friendly. Collaborating with end users and incorporating their feedback are crucial for the successful development of any practice network research ITI.

A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research

BackgroundThere are marked inequalities in palliative care provision. Research is needed to understand how such inequalities can be addressed, so that everyone living with advanced illness can receive the care they need, when they need it. Research into inequalities in palliative care should be guided by Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) that includes people from diverse backgrounds, who are less likely to receive specialist services. Multi-disciplinary research partnerships, bringing together primary care (the main providers of palliative care to diverse communities) and specialist palliative care, have the potential to work together in new ways to do research to address inequalities and improve palliative care in practice. This report describes a research partnership between primary care and palliative care that aimed to: (1) create opportunities for more inclusive PPI in palliative care research, (2) co-design new resources to support more equitable, diverse and inclusive PPI for palliative care, (3) propose a new framework for inclusive PPI in palliative care research.MethodsPPI members were recruited via primary care and palliative care research networks from three diverse areas of the UK. A pragmatic, collaborative approach was taken to achieve the partnership aims. Online workshops were carried out to understand barriers to inclusive PPI in palliative care and to co-design resources. Evaluation included a “you said, we did” impact log and a short survey. The approach was informed by good practice principles from previous PPI, and existing theory relating to equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion.ResultsIn total, 16 PPI members were recruited. Most were White British (n = 10), other ethnicities were Asian (n = 4), Black African (n = 1) and British mixed race (n = 1). The research team co-ordinated communication and activities, leading to honest conversations about barriers to inclusive PPI. Resources were co-designed, including a role description for an Equity, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Champion, a “jargon buster”, an animation and an online recipe book (http://www.re-equipp.co.uk/) to inform future PPI. Learning from the partnership has been collated into a new framework to inform more inclusive PPI for future palliative care research.ConclusionCollaboration and reciprocal learning across a multi-disciplinary primary care and palliative care research partnership led to the development of new approaches and resources. Research team commitment, shared vision, adequate resource, careful planning, relationship building and evaluation should underpin approaches to increase equality, diversity and inclusivity in future PPI for palliative care research.

Plant-Based Milk Consumption and Growth in Children 1–10 Years of Age

BackgroundThe effects of plant-based milk consumption on the growth of children are unclear. ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate the relationship between plant-based milk consumption and BMI in childhood. Secondary objectives were to examine the association with height and whether these relationships are mediated by dairy milk intake and modified by age or the type of plant-based milk consumed. MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted in healthy children aged 1–10 y through the TARGet Kids! primary care research network in Toronto, Canada. Linear mixed-effect modeling and logistic generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between plant-based milk consumption (number of 250 mL cups/d) and BMI. A mediation analysis was conducted to examine whether dairy milk intake mediated these relationships. Effect modification by age and type of plant-based milk was explored. ResultsAmong 7195 children (mean age: 3.1 y; 52.3% male), higher plant-based milk consumption was associated with lower BMI (P = 0.0002) and height (P = 0.005). No association was found with BMI categories. Lower dairy milk intake partially mediated these relationships. A child aged 5 y who consumed 3 cups of plant-based milk compared with 3 cups of dairy milk had a lower weight of 0.5 kg and lower height of 0.8 cm. Associations did not change over time and were similar for children who consumed soy milk compared with other plant-based milks. ConclusionsPlant-based milk consumption was associated with lower BMI and height, but both were within the normal range on average. Future longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether these associations persist over time.

Parents' attitudes towards research involving genome sequencing of their healthy children: a qualitative study.

With widespread genomic sequencing research efforts, there is increasing impetus to return results to participants. Parents of healthy children are increasingly asked to participate in genomic research, yet there are limited studies of parental expectations for the return of results amongst healthy children. We explored parental attitudes towards their healthy children's participation in genomic research and expectations for return of results. Data collection involved semi-structured telephone interviews with parents of healthy children participating in a primary care research network. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using constant comparison. A total of 26 parents were interviewed: 22 were female, 19 self-reported as White/European, and 20 were aged 30-39. Three themes emerged: (1) Reciprocity; Parents preferred to receive medically actionable, childhood-onset results and expected recontact overtime in exchange for their research participation. (2) Downstream impacts of testing; Parents expected future clinical benefits but were concerned about the risk of genetic discrimination. (3) Power and empowerment; Some parents felt empowered to take preventative action for their child and relatives, while others did not want to limit their child's autonomy. Considering these tensions may help to inform participant-centered approaches to optimize parental decision-making and participation, as well as maximize the utility of results.

Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination in young children.

To examine factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination (time to vaccination and vaccination status) among healthy young children participating in primary healthcare. A cohort study was conducted between November 2021 and September 2022 through the TARGet Kids! primary care research network in Toronto, Canada. Sociodemographic information, child and parent health characteristics, parental vaccine beliefs and child COVID-19 vaccine uptake were collected through parent-reported questionnaires. The primary outcome was time to child COVID-19 vaccination, measured as the time between vaccine availability date and parent-reported child COVID-19 vaccination date. Interval-censored proportional hazard models were used. A total of 267 children age 0 to 13years were included. The mean child age was 7.6years, 52.8% (n = 141) were male, 66.5% (n = 141) had mothers of European ethnicity (with missingness), and 68.2% (n = 182) of the children were vaccinated. All parents of vaccinated children had received the COVID-19 vaccination themselves. The rate of vaccination for children was 2% higher with each one-month increase in child age (adjusted HR = 1.02, 95%CI = 1.01-1.03, p < 0.001). Compared to children whose parents had uncertain beliefs, those whose parents had positive beliefs about the importance and safety of COVID-19 vaccination for their children had higher rates of vaccination (adjusted HR = 8.29, 95%CI = 4.25-16.17, p < 0.001; adjusted HR = 5.09, 95%CI = 3.17-8.17, p < 0.001). Older child age, parental COVID-19 vaccination, and positive parental beliefs about COVID-19 vaccination were statistically significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccination among healthy young children. Our findings may help to inform policies, practices, and research which aim to strengthen parental vaccine confidence and promote child COVID-19 vaccination.

Promoting South Asian primary care research and projecting family medicine practitioner-scholars: A matter of critical importance

ABSTRACT South Asia, constituting India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bhutan represents the most populous region in the world burdened with significant multilevel poverty. Primary care is well-documented to reduce the burden of diseases (both chronic and acute) and associated morbidity and mortality; be cost-effective and improve health outcomes and health equity for both individuals and populations. Any field, for it to stay relevant and to effectively achieve its stated mission, needs to produce its own knowledge through research. This translates into patient care, practice models, education, and advocacy for health systems strengthening and reform. In primary care, weaving experiential wisdom with clinical evidence lies at the heart of translation. In this editorial, we highlight: a) that local context, in terms of geography, community, culture, language and beliefs, influences the clinical context and practice and therefore research. Thus, relying on primary care research done elsewhere in the globe will not suffice; b) effective primary care is based on a generalist approach that involves certain ways of being, knowing, perceiving, and doing guided by the values of humility and intellectual curiosity, diversity and inclusion, equity, holistic approach to evidence, integrity, transparency, accountability and adaptability, and communication; and c) that the South Asian Region (SAR) has a number of groups experimenting and innovating with various healthcare delivery systems, much of which is not known to the larger field. The WONCA SAR Primary Care Research Network has been set up to facilitate and support scholarship, writing, and publication in primary care especially by practising family physicians. In conclusion, it will be critical to simultaneously promote grounded theory research that integrates both the family medicine/primary care perspective and the voices of families and address the ‘hidden curriculum’ that shapes the attitudes and aspirations of young doctors at both the undergraduate and postgraduate level. Family Physicians treat a variety of patients on a daily basis, in order to improve the quality of care and impact of primary care, it is imperative that the understanding and application of research is enhanced by specialists of this discipline.

Evaluation of administrative case definitions for hypertension in Canadian children

Hypertension is increasing in children and warrants disease surveillance. We therefore sought to evaluate the validity of case definitions to identify pediatric hypertension in administrative healthcare data. Cases of hypertension in children 3–18 years of age were identified utilizing blood pressures recorded in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) electronic medical record from 2014 to 2016. Prevalence of hypertension and associated clinical characteristics were determined. We then evaluated the validity of 18 case definitions combining outpatient physician visits (ICD9CM codes), hospital claims (ICD9CM/ICD10 codes) and antihypertensive use within 1–3 years of data housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy. The MaPCReN database identified 241 children with hypertension and 4090 without (prevalence = 5.6%). The sensitivity of algorithms ranged between 0.18 and 0.51 and the specificity between 0.98 and 1.00. Pharmaceutical use increased the sensitivity of algorithms significantly. The algorithms with the highest sensitivity and area under the ROC curve were 1 or more hospitalization OR 1 or more physician claim OR 1 or more pharmaceutical record. Evaluating 2 years of data is recommended. Administrative data alone reflects diagnosis of hypertension with high specificity, but underestimate the true prevalence of this disease. Alternative data sources are therefore required for disease surveillance.

Identifying Sex-Specific Differences in Young-Onset Metabolic Syndrome Using Primary Care Electronic Medical Record.

Objectives: To apply a case definition to a Northern Alberta-based primary care practice population and to assess the sex-specific characteristics of young-onset metabolic syndrome (MetS). Design: We carried out a cross-sectional study to identify and estimate the prevalence of MetS using electronic medical record (EMR) data and perform descriptive comparative analyses of demographic and clinical characteristics between males and females. Setting: Northern Alberta Primary Care Research Network (NAPCReN) consists of EMR patient data from 77 physicians among 18 clinics. Participants: Patients with one or more clinic visit between 2015 and 2018, between 18 and 40 years old, residing in Northern Alberta. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of prevalence in MetS between sexes as well as sex-specific distribution of MetS characteristics [body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), presence of hypertension, and presence of diabetes]. Results: Of 15,766 patients, 4.4% (n = 700) had young-onset MetS based on recorded data, prevalence was nearly twice as high in males (6.1%, n = 354) compared with females (3.5%, n = 346). The most prevalent risk factor for MetS consisted of having an elevated BMI for both females (90.9%) and males (91.5%). In the presence of MetS, more females had lower HDL-C [68.2% females (F) vs. 52.5% males (M)], and higher prevalence of diabetes (21.4% F vs. 9.0% M), whereas more males had hypertriglyceridemia (60.4% F vs. 79.7% M) and hypertension (12.4% F vs. 15.8% M). Females also had consistently higher percentages of absent laboratory data compared with males when identified as having MetS and BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Conclusions: Males have nearly twice the prevalence of young-onset MetS compared with females, with notable sex-specific differences in the manifestation of MetS, although we suspect that this is partially due to underreporting where the absence of anthropomorphic and laboratory investigations point to a lack of testing. Sex-specific screening for MetS, especially among young females of childbearing years, is important for downstream prevention.

Characterizing the use of virtual care in primary care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.

In March 2020, Canada implemented restrictions to curb viral transmission of COVID-19, which resulted in abrupt disruptions to conventional (in-person) clinical care. To retain continuity of care the delivery of primary care services shifted to virtual care. This study examined the nature of virtual visits, characterizing the use and users of virtual care in primary care settings from March 14/20 to June 30/20 of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada that participate in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) and offered ≥ 1 virtual care visit between 03/14/20 and 06/30/20 representing 142,616 patients. Tariff codes from billing records determined the visit type (clinic visit, virtual care). Between 03/14/20, and 06/30/20, we assessed each visit for a follow-up visit between the same patient and provider for the same diagnosis code. Patient (sex, age, comorbidities, visit frequency, prescriptions) and provider (sex, age, clinic location, provider type, remuneration, country of graduation, return visit rate) characteristics describe the study population by visit type. Generalized estimating equation models describe factors associated with virtual care. RESULTS: There were 146,372 visits provided by 154 primary care providers between 03/14/20 and 06/30/20, of which 33.6% were virtual care. Female patients (OR 1.16, CI 1.09-1.22), patients with ≥ 3 comorbidities (OR 1.71, CI 1.44-2.02), and patients with ≥ 10 prescriptions (OR 2.71, 2.2-1.53) had higher odds of receiving at least one virtual care visit compared to male patients, patients with no comorbidities and patients with no prescriptions. There was no significant difference between the number of follow-up visits that were provided as a clinic visit compared to a virtual care visit (8.7% vs. 5.8%) (p = 0.6496). Early in the pandemic restrictions, approximately one-third of visits were virtual. Virtual care was utilized by patients with more comorbidities and prescriptions, suggesting that patients with chronic disease requiring ongoing care utilized virtual care. Virtual care as a primary care visit type continues to evolve. Ongoing provision of virtual care can enhance quality, patient-centered care moving forward.

Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail

BackgroundAudit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to reduce antibiotic prescribing for viral infections and antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia.MethodsClustered randomized trial of 239 primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada, participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. Forty-six practices were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control group, intervention 1 (recommendations summary), intervention 2 (recommendations summary and personalized feedback). We assessed prescribing rates prior to the intervention (2014/15), during and immediately after the intervention (2016/17) and following the intervention (2018/19). Physician characteristics were assessed.ResultsBetween 2014/15–2016/17, 91.6% of providers in intervention group 1 and 95.9% of providers in intervention group 2 reduced their antibiotic and antipsychotic prescribing rate by ≥ 1 compared to the control group (77.6%) (p-value 0.0073). This reduction was maintained into 2018/19 at 91.4%. On multivariate regression alternatively funded providers had 2.4 × higher odds of reducing their antibiotic prescribing rate compared to fee-for-service providers. In quantile regression of providers with a reduction in antibiotic prescribing, alternatively funded (e.g. salaried or locum) providers compared to fee-for-service providers were significant at the 80th quantile.ConclusionsBoth A&F and recommendation summaries sent to providers by a trusted source reduced unnecessary prescriptions. Our findings support further scale up of efforts to engage with primary care practices to improve care with A&F.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05385445, retrospectively registered, 23/05/2022.

89 Centre-based child care attendance in early childhood and adiposity in later childhood: a prospective cohort study

Abstract Background One in three children are living with overweight or obesity in North America. The burden of childhood obesity is disproportionately experienced by children from low-income families, who are more likely to have obesity. Centre-based child care attendance may influence important adiposity risk factors such as dietary intake, eating behaviour, and physical activity, but its impact on childhood obesity is unclear. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between the intensity of centre-based child care attendance between 1 and 4 years of age and Body Mass Index z-score (zBMI) from 4 to 10 years of age relative to non-centre-based child care (i.e., home-based, grandparents, relatives, and nanny’s). The secondary objective was to explore if family income modified the relationship. Design/Methods A prospective cohort study of children 1 to 10 years of age was conducted through the TARGet Kids! primary care research network. The primary exposure was intensity of centre-based child care attendance (hours/week). The primary outcome was zBMI, an age and sex adjusted measure of child adiposity. Interaction terms for child age and family income were explored. A linear mixed effects model and logistic generalized estimating equations were used to determine the association between centre-based child care attendance and child zBMI. Results 3,503 children were included (mean age: 2.7 years). Children who attended centre-based child care full time (40 hours/week) had a 0.11 lower zBMI at 4 years (95% CI -0.19, -0.03; p=0.005) and lower odds of obesity (zBMI &amp;gt; 2) at 4 (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.34, 0.99; p=0.04) and 10 years of age (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29, 0.90; p=0.02) relative to children who attended non-centre-based child care. The relationship was modified by family income such that, children from families with an income of &amp;lt;$50,000CDN who attended centre-based child care full time had a 0.35 (95% CI -0.56, -0.15; p=0.001), 0.34 (95% CI -0.54, -0.13, p=0.001) and 0.29 (95% CI -0.50, -0.07, p=0.009) lower zBMI at 4, 7 and 10 years of age, respectively, relative to children who attended non-centre-based child care. Conclusion Centre-based child care attendance in early childhood was associated with lower adiposity and odds of obesity in later childhood. This relationship was stronger for children who were from lower income families. Centre-based child care may be an effective early intervention to prevent childhood obesity.

Primary medication nonadherence in a large primary care population: Observational study from Manitoba.

To analyze primary medication nonadherence across several prescription indications and test the predictors of drug nonadherence in an adult primary care population. Retrospective observational study using primary care provider prescriptions linked to pharmacy-based dispensing data from 2012 to 2014. Manitoba. Patients in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. Prevalence of primary medication nonadherence by drug class. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test the associations of patient demographic and clinical or provider characteristics with primary medication nonadherence. The C statistic was used to assess the models' discriminative performance. A total of 91,660 unique prescriptions were assessed from a cohort of more than 200,000 patients. Primary medication nonadherence ranged from 13.7% (antidepressants) to 30.3% (antihypertensives). In conditions that typically present symptomatically (eg, infections, anxiety) nonadherence ranged from 13.7% to 17.5%. The range was 21.2% to 30.0% for medications related to asymptomatic conditions or those typically detected by screening. The discriminative performance of the models based on patient demographic, clinical, or provider characteristics was weak. Primary medication nonadherence is common, occurring more often in asymptomatic conditions. The poor predictability of the models suggests that caution is required when considering characteristic-based interventions or prediction tools to improve primary medication nonadherence.

Centre-Based Child Care Attendance in Early Childhood and Growth in Later Childhood: A Prospective Cohort Study

ObjectivesAttending centre-based child care in early childhood may influence important health behaviours including nutrition, physical activity and routines related to child growth and weight status. The primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between centre-based child care attendance between 1 and 4 years of age and Body Mass Index z-score (zBMI) from 4 to 10 years of age relative to non-centre-based child care (i.e., home-based, grandparents, relatives, and nanny's). The secondary objective was to explore if family income and child age modified the relationship.MethodsA prospective cohort study of children aged 1 to 10 years was conducted through the TARGet Kids! primary care research network. The exposure was centre-based child care attendance (hours/week). Outcomes were zBMI and odds of overweight and obesity (zBMI > 1). Interaction terms for child age and family income were explored. Linear mixed effect models and logistic generalized estimating equations were used.Results3,503 children who attended child care were included (mean age: 2.7 years at baseline). Children who attended centre-based care full-time (40 hours/week) had a 0.11 (95% CI: −0.19, −0.03; p = 0.01) lower zBMI at 4 and 7 years of age and lower odds of overweight/obesity at 4 years of age (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62, 0.97; p = 0.03) relative to children who attended non-centre-based care. Children from families with income < $50,000CDN who attended centre-based care full time had a 0.32 (95% CI: −0.50, −0.14; p = 0.001) lower zBMI and lower odds of overweight/obesity (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.99; p = 0.05) at 10 years of age relative to children who attended non-centre-based care.ConclusionsAttending centre-based child care in early childhood was associated with a lower zBMI and lower odds of overweight/obesity in later childhood, and associations were stronger for children from lower income families. Centre-based child care may be an effective early intervention for the prevention of childhood obesity.Funding SourcesCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

Underuse of cardiorenal protective agents in high-risk diabetes patients in primary care: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have shown benefits in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD), heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD).ObjectiveWe assessed benchmark outcomes (Hemoglobin A1c, LDL-C, and blood pressure), identified the prevalence of cardiorenal indications for SGLT2i and GLP-1RA, and compared prescribing rates of GLP1-RA and SGLT2i in those with and without cardiorenal indications.MethodsWe analyzed data from January 2018–June 2019 for 7168 patients with diabetes using electronic medical records from the Northern Alberta Primary Care Research Network, a regional network of the Canadian Primary Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). Patients with and without cardiorenal comorbidities were compared using descriptive statistics and two proportion Z tests.ResultsHemoglobin A1c ≤ 7.0% was met by 56.8%, blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg by 62.1%, LDL-C ≤ 2.0 mmol/L by 45.3% of patients. There were 4377 patients on glucose lowering medications; metformin was most common (77.7%), followed by insulin (24.6%), insulin secretagogues (23.6%), SGLT2i (19.7%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (19.3%), and GLP-1RA (9.4%). A quarter of patients had cardiorenal indications for SGLT2i or GLP-1RA. Use of SGLT2i in these patients was lower than in patients without cardiorenal comorbidities (14.9% vs 21.2%, p < 0.05). GLP-1RA use in these patients was 4.6% compared with 11% in those without cardiorenal comorbidities (p < 0.05).DiscussionContrary to current evidence and recommendations, SGLT2i and GLP1-RA were less likely to be prescribed to patients with pre-existing CVD, HF, and/or CKD, revealing opportunities to improve prescribing for patients with diabetes at high-risk for worsening cardiorenal complications.

The impact of an intensive care unit admission on the health status of relatives of intensive care survivors: A prospective cohort study in primary care

Background Relatives of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors may suffer from various symptoms after ICU admittance of their relative, known as post-intensive care syndrome-family (PICS-F). Studies regarding PICS-F have been performed but its impact in primary care is unknown. Objectives To explore health problems of relatives of ICU survivors in primary care. Methods This is an exploratory prospective cohort study in which we combined data from two hospitals and a primary care research network in the Netherlands. ICU survivors who had been admitted between January 2005 and July 2017 were identified and matched by sex and age with up to four chronically ill (e.g. COPD, cardiovascular disease) patients. In both groups, relatives living in the same household were identified and included in this study. Primary outcome was the number of new episodes of care (International Classification of Primary Care-2) for up to five years. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the total number of new episodes were calculated. Results Relatives of ICU survivors (n = 267, mean age 38.1 years, 41.0% male) had significantly more new care episodes compared to the reference group (n = 705, mean age 36.3 years, 41.1% male) 1–2 years (median 0.11 vs. 0.08, HR 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.54) and 2–5 years (median 0.18 vs. 0.13, HR 1.28; 95%CI 1.06–1.56) after ICU discharge. No differences were found in the period before ICU admission. Conclusion Relatives of ICU survivors present more morbidity in primary care than relatives of chronically ill patients up to five years after ICU discharge.

The Norwegian PraksisNett: a nationwide practice-based research network with a novel IT infrastructure

Purpose Clinical research in primary care is relatively scarce. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are research infrastructures to overcome hurdles associated with conducting studies in primary care. In Norway, almost all 5.4 million inhabitants have access to a general practitioner (GP) through a patient-list system. This gives opportunity for a PBRN with reliable information about the general population. The aim of the current paper is to describe the establishment, organization and function of PraksisNett (the Norwegian Primary Care Research Network). Materials and Methods We describe the development, funding and logistics of PraksisNett as a nationwide PBRN. Results PraksisNett received funding from the Research Council of Norway for an establishment period of five years (2018–2022). It is comprised of two parts; a human infrastructure (employees, including academic GPs) organized as four regional nodes and a coordinating node and an IT infrastructure comprised by the Snow system in conjunction with the Medrave M4 system. The core of the infrastructure is the 92 general practices that are contractually linked to PraksisNett. These include 492 GPs, serving almost 520,000 patients. Practices were recruited during 2019–2020 and comprise a representative mix of rural and urban settings spread throughout all regions of Norway. Conclusion Norway has established a nationwide PBRN to reduce hurdles for conducting clinical studies in primary care. Improved infrastructure for clinical studies in primary care is expected to increase the attractiveness for studies on the management of disorders and diseases in primary care and facilitate international research collaboration. This will benefit both patients, GPs and society in terms of improved quality of care. Key points Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are research infrastructures to overcome hurdles associated with conducting studies in primary care Improved infrastructure for clinical studies in primary care is expected to increase the attractiveness for studies on the management of disorders and diseases in primary care and facilitate international research collaboration We describe PraksisNett, a Norwegian PBRN consisting of 92 general practices including 492 GPs, serving almost 520,000 patients An advanced and secure IT infrastructure connects the general practices to PraksisNett and makes it possible to identify and recruit patients in a novel way, as well as reuse clinical data PraksisNett will benefit both patients, GPs and society in terms of improved quality of care This paper may inform and inspire initiatives to establish PBRNs elsewhere

Demonstrating the complexity of patient-partnered research in primary care: a snapshot of patient-partners.

Background: In Canada, we are still struggling to achieve the critical goal of enabling performant health care systems that moves research results to real-world impact particularly for primary care. To address this, we have created a primary care research network where patient partners are involved in all levels of decision making for governance, research, and innovation. For many researchers, however, it is unclear what primary care patient-partners 'brings to the table.' As the Pan-Canadian Patient Council of the Primary and Integrated Health Care Innovations Network, we wanted to provide insight into the richness of expertise and experience patient partners contribute. Objectives: To provide an example of the characteristics, history and lived experience that patient-partners in a primary care research network represent and demonstrate the resource this presents. Methods: As current council members, representing 10 provinces, we developed a survey of our demographics, personal history and experience in patient-oriented research using iterative, collaborative meetings. The answers to the questions provided "snapshots" for each of us. As a group, we worked with researchers to descriptively and thematically analyze the responses to provide insight and a description of primary care research patient partners. Results: With 2 men and 8 women, we represented an average of 42.5 years of experience with health conditions (range 10-84 years) including cancer, genetic conditions, and multiple chronic diseases. On average, we worked with 4.7 different organizations each (range 2-9) on research topics covering the spectrum of primary care. Many of us acted as mentors for researchers and trainees. All of us were innovators and influencers with demonstrated leadership skills. A need for more diversity in terms of age and underrepresented minorities was noted. Conclusion: Diversity of life experience, extensive exposure to the health care system and strong engagement with multiple organizations for primary care research characterized us as patient-partners. This lived expertise represents a significant asset for researchers. This work should encourage researchers to starting thinking about how to include primary care patient-partners as a crucial resource in health research.

Continuous glucose monitoring for primary care patients with diabetes: Barriers, facilitators, & resources to support access.

Context: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes is associated with improved patient health outcomes including reduced glycated hemoglobin (A1c) and hypoglycemia and is part of ADA Standards of Medical Care. CGM prescription often takes place in endocrinology practices. With limited access to endocrinologists, many patients could benefit from receiving CGM through primary care. Objective: The overall study aims to understand primary care clinicians' CGM prescribing experience and likelihood to prescribe, and identify resources needed to support prescribing CGM. This qualitative phase examines barriers and facilitators to prescribing, and resources to support prescribing. Study Design: Qualitative phase of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study following a cross-sectional online survey. Respondents were invited to participate in phone/virtual interviews to understand CGM prescribing attitudes and behaviors. Participants were stratified based on factors related to distance to an endocrinologist and prescribing behavior. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to understand relationships and trends, and identify resources to support CGM prescription in primary care. Setting: Two primary care research networks. Population studied: Primary care physicians and advanced practice providers in the U.S. Outcome Measures: Resources needed, barriers, and facilitators to prescribing CGM. Results: 55 interviews were conducted. The following themes emerged in the analysis: Insurance and cost-related barriers were most commonly cited, as well as distance to endocrinology when > 40 miles away. Facilitators included training and experience with CGM and staff to support patient education and insurance navigation. Resources (e.g., webinars, online guides, conferences) to increase knowledge about CGM use and clinical outcomes and guidance with insurance processes/coverage could support CGM prescription in primary care. Conclusions: Increased understanding among primary care clinicians of the use and benefits of CGM can help with confidence in prescribing. CGM management in primary care could benefit patients with diabetes, especially those with access barriers to endocrinologists. Addressing cost and insurance barriers at a policy level can make CGM more attainable to underserved populations and reduce disparities in diabetes control.

Randomized controlled trial of an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations.

Context: Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) aims to engage healthcare providers to reduce unnecessary care. Reducing overuse of antimicrobials and antipsychotics in patients with dementia in primary care settings remains an ongoing challenge. Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions can facilitate practice change but can be improved by understanding factors affecting the likelihood of uptake of the feedback. Objective: To assess the impact of A&F interventions to reduce unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics and antipsychotics use and evaluate whether practice changes remain stable over time. Design: Clustered randomized controlled trial. Dataset: The Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN), a practice-based network that includes a repository containing de-identified EMR data from over 288,000 Manitobans. Population: Primary care providers participating in MaPCReN were randomized to three A&F groups: 1) Information on the relevant CWC recommendations; 2) practice specific data along with general information regarding the CWC recommendations 3) No CWC information. Outcome Measures: Statistics demonstrating changes in target prescriptions. Multivariate regression assessed characteristics of providers with improved prescribing. Results: 182 primary care providers were evaluated, 86.3% decreased the number of target prescriptions. More providers decreased prescribing in group1 (88.9%) or group2 (94.0%) compared to the control group 3 (76.7%) (p-value 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between practice specific feedback and generic CWC information. An average of 46 antibiotic medications per provider were prescribed for viral indications in 2014/2015. This dropped to 15 in 2016/17 and was 18 in 2018/19. An average of 3 antipsychotic medications were prescribed for patients with dementia in 2014/2015. This dropped 7% in 2016/17 and remained stable in 2018/19. There were no statistically significant provider characteristics when considering all providers with improved prescribing, but male, rural and fee for service providers were more likely to decrease prescribing greater than the mean. Conclusion: Both practice specific and generic A&F information sent directly to primary care providers by a trusted source reduced potentially unnecessary prescriptions. This supports ongoing engagement with primary care providers in practice-based research networks to improve care and promote sustained practice changes.

Oncology and Primary Care Provider Views on Cancer Survivorship Care: Mind the Gap.

Coordination between oncology and primary care practices in cancer survivorship is lacking. To identify cancer care coordination perceptions, knowledge, and practices in a sample of Oklahoma oncology care providers (ONCs) and primary care providers (PCPs) regarding post-treatment care of adult cancer survivors. Cross-sectional, statewide survey by mail/web link in 2014/5. PCPs identified through a primary care research network, primary care organization membership lists; ONCs identified through www.Healthgrades.com. Contacts who were clinically active and seeing cancer patients were eligible. The final sample size included 101 ONCs and 58 PCPs who reported actively seeing cancer patients. Responses to predominately Likert scale or ranked-order questions derived from the Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors. Chi square and t tests were performed to test bivariate associations between provider type and survey measures. Statistically significant differences (P < .05) between ONC and PCP perceptions were observed for several questions on communication between the 2 provider types, ONC perceptions of PCP ability to address survivorship care, and responsibilities for post-treatment care. Highly discrepant perspectives between ONCs and PCPs regarding communications and responsibilities for survivorship care may lead to adverse health outcomes. Interventions aimed at improving care coordination for cancer survivors should define each provider group's responsibilities in survivorship care, and create structures and processes that foster clear channels of communication between ONC and PCP practices.