Primary Care-Mental Health Integration Program Research Articles

Management of Mental Health Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, and Suicide in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guideline for Healthcare Providers.

Management of Mental Health Disorders, Substance Use Disorders, and Suicide in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guideline for Healthcare Providers.

Measurement-based care implementation in a Veterans Affairs primary care-mental health integration program.

Measurement-based care (MBC) in behavioral health is the systematic use of validated measurement tools to guide clinical decision making and collaborative treatment planning. Although benefits of MBC for clinicians and patients have been supported by research, it appears to be underutilized in clinical settings. This study examined the effectiveness of a MBC implementation plan informed by the theory of planned behavior in a large, integrated primary care program at a Veterans Affairs hospital over 18 months. Multiple methods, including self-report clinician data and aggregated clinic data, were used to examine change in clinician MBC-related behaviors over time. Results demonstrated both an increase in symptom measures administered per clinical encounter and per individual patient treated. Additionally, the ratio of individuals receiving at least one symptom rating measure to total number of patients treated decreased over time, demonstrating increased use of MBC by integrated primary care clinicians. Survey data demonstrated upward trends in administering measures at initial assessment and at treatment termination, and clinician attitudes toward MBC were generally positive. Results corroborate the theory of planned behavior as a model in which to guide systematic MBC implementation. MBC implementation challenges and recommendations are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Regional Adoption of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration in Veterans Health Administration Patient-Centered Medical Homes.

Behavioral health integration is important, yet difficult to implement, in patient-centered medical homes. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) mandated evidence-based collaborative care models through Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) in large PC clinics. This study characterized PC-MHI programs among all PC clinics, including small sites exempt from program implementation, in one VA region. Researchers administered a cross-sectional key informant organizational survey on PC-MHI among VA PC clinics in Southern California, Arizona, and New Mexico (n = 69 distinct sites) from February to May 2018. Researchers analyzed PC clinic leaders' responses to five items about organizational structure and practice management. Researchers received surveys from 65 clinics (94% response rate). Although only 38% were required to implement on-site PC-MHI programs, 95% of participating clinics reported providing access to such services. The majority reported having integrated, colocated, or tele-MH providers (94%) and care management (77%). Most stated same-day services (59%) and "warm" handoffs (56%) were always available, the former varying significantly based on clinic size and distance from affiliated VA hospitals. Regional adoption of PC-MHI was high, including telemedicine, among VA patient-centered medical homes, regardless of whether implementation was required. Small, remote PC clinics that voluntarily provide PC-MHI services may need more support.

Supplemental Material for Measurement-Based Care Implementation in a Veterans Affairs Primary Care–Mental Health Integration Program

Supplemental Material for Measurement-Based Care Implementation in a Veterans Affairs Primary Care–Mental Health Integration Program

Social Ties and Suicidal Ideation Among Veterans Referred to a Primary Care-Mental Health Integration Program.

This study examined associations between three indices of social ties (perceived social support, frequency of negative social exchanges, and degree of social integration) and suicidal ideation among veterans referred by their primary care provider for a behavioral health assessment. The sample included 15,277 veterans who completed a mental health and substance use assessment on referral to a Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) program. Data on sociodemographic factors, mental health and substance use conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, and substance use), perceived general health, the three indices of social ties, and suicidal ideation were extracted from clinical interviews. The mean±SD age of the sample was 51.3±15.9, most (89%) were men, and about half (48%) were white. Most met criteria for at least one mental health or substance use condition on PCMHI assessment, and 39% reported either low- or high-severity suicidal ideation, as measured by the Paykel Suicide Scale. Logistic regression analyses indicated that after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, perceived health, and comorbid mental health and substance use conditions, each of the three social tie indices was uniquely associated with higher odds of reporting suicidal ideation, compared with no ideation. Findings underscore the value of assessing multiple indices of social ties when examining suicidal ideation among high-risk veterans in primary care experiencing behavioral health issues. Incorporating an assessment of the quality of patients' social interactions and level of social integration into routine PCMHI practice has the potential to enhance screening and intervention efforts aimed at reducing suicidal ideation.

Functional concerns and treatment priorities among veterans receiving VHA Primary Care Behavioral Health services.

The Primary Care-Mental Health Integration program is a component of the Veterans Health Administration's patient-centered medical home, which emphasizes comprehensive, patient-centered care. One model of primary care-mental health integration, known as Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH), positions trained behavioral health providers as members of the primary care team. Whereas patient perspectives are essential to effective patient-centered care, little empirical information exists regarding patients' goals and priorities for addressing their biopsychosocial concerns in PCBH. A regional mail survey of Veterans Health Administration patients was used. We collected data from 281 veterans (27% response rate) who received PCBH services in a northeastern region. Respondents identified difficulty with sleep (80%), low energy/amotivation (78%), and managing stress (72%) as the most prevalent individual concerns, although the majority endorsed concerns in multiple domains of functioning. Overwhelmingly, patients who endorsed any biopsychosocial problem area reported that they did (53-93%) or would like to (56-81%) address that concern with a behavioral health provider. Respondents most frequently identified anger as a top priority for future care, followed by stress management, energy/motivation, and sleep disturbance. Whereas sample means signaled neutral or better quality of life in most individual domains, total Quality of Life Inventory scores suggested very low (32%) to average (30%) overall quality-of -life ratings for most participants. In addition to symptom-focused PCBH assessments, providers should gather biopsychosocial data to identify and monitor functional and quality-of -life concerns and evaluate patient preferences in addressing these concerns over the course of clinical care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Enhancing implementation of measurement-based mental health care in primary care: a mixed-methods randomized effectiveness evaluation of implementation facilitation

BackgroundMental health care lags behind other forms of medical care in its reliance on subjective clinician assessment. Although routine use of standardized patient-reported outcome measures, measurement-based care (MBC), can improve patient outcomes and engagement, clinician efficiency, and, collaboration across care team members, full implementation of this complex practice change can be challenging. This study seeks to understand whether and how an intensive facilitation strategy can be effective in supporting the implementation of MBC. Implementation researchers partnering with US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) leaders are conducting the study within the context of a national initiative to support MBC implementation throughout VA mental health services. This study will focus specifically on VA Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) programs.MethodsA mixed-methods, multiple case study design will include 12 PCMHI sites recruited from the 23 PCMHI programs that volunteered to participate in the VA national initiative. Guided by a study partnership panel, sites are clustered into similar groups using administrative metrics. Site pairs are recruited from within these groups. Within pairs, sites are randomized to the implementation facilitation strategy (external facilitation plus QI team) or standard VA national support. The implementation strategy provides an external facilitator and MBC experts who work with intervention sites to form a QI team, develop an implementation plan, and, identify and overcome barriers to implementation. The RE-AIM framework guides the evaluation of the implementation facilitation strategy which will utilize data from administrative, medical record, and primary qualitative and quantitative sources. Guided by the iPARIHS framework and using a mixed methods approach, we will also examine factors associated with implementation success. Finally, we will explore whether implementation of MBC increases primary care team communication and function related to the care of mental health conditions.DiscussionMBC has significant potential to improve mental health care but it represents a major change in practice. Understanding factors that can support MBC implementation is essential to attaining its potential benefits and spreading these benefits across the health care system.

Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER): a protocol for a program of research

BackgroundThe Enhancing Mental and Physical health of Women through Engagement and Retention or EMPOWER program represents a partnership with the US Department of Veterans Health Administration (VA) Health Service Research and Development investigators and the VA Office of Women’s Health, National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Primary Care-Mental Health Integration Program Office, Women’s Mental Health Services, and the Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation. EMPOWER includes three projects designed to improve women Veterans’ engagement and retention in evidence-based care for high-priority health conditions, i.e., prediabetes, cardiovascular, and mental health.Methods/DesignThe three proposed projects will be conducted in VA primary care clinics that serve women Veterans including general primary care and women’s health clinics. The first project is a 1-year quality improvement project targeting diabetes prevention. Two multi-site research implementation studies will focus on cardiovascular risk prevention and collaborative care to address women Veterans’ mental health treatment needs respectively. All projects will use the evidence-based Replicating Effective Programs (REP) implementation strategy, enhanced with multi-stakeholder engagement and complexity theory. Mixed methods implementation evaluations will focus on investigating primary implementation outcomes of adoption, acceptability, feasibility, and reach. Program-wide organizational-, provider-, and patient-level measures and tools will be utilized to enhance synergy, productivity, and impact. Both implementation research studies will use a non-randomized stepped wedge design.DiscussionEMPOWER represents a coherent program of women’s health implementation research and quality improvement that utilizes cross-project implementation strategies and evaluation methodology. The EMPOWER Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) will constitute a major milestone for realizing women Veterans’ engagement and empowerment in the VA system. EMPOWER QUERI will be conducted in close partnership with key VA operations partners, such as the VA Office of Women’s Health, to disseminate and spread the programs nationally.Trial registrationThe two implementation research studies described in this protocol have been registered as required:Facilitating Cardiovascular Risk Screening and Risk Reduction in Women Veterans: Trial registration NCT02991534, registered 9 December 2016.Implementation of Tailored Collaborative Care for Women Veterans: Trial registration NCT02950961, registered 21 October 2016.

Using implementation facilitation to foster clinical practice quality and adherence to evidence in challenged settings: a qualitative study

BackgroundWe evaluated a facilitation strategy to help clinical sites likely to experience challenges implement evidence-based Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) care models within the context of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiative. This article describes our assessment of whether implementation facilitation (IF) can foster development of high quality PC-MHI programs that adhere to evidence, are sustainable and likely to improve clinical practices and outcomes.MethodsUtilizing a matched pair design, we conducted a qualitative descriptive evaluation of the IF strategy in sixteen VA primary care clinics. To assess program quality and adherence to evidence, we conducted one-hour structured telephone interviews, at two time points, with clinicians and leaders who knew the most about the clinics’ programs. We then created structured summaries of the interviews that VA national PC-MHI experts utilized to rate the programs on four dimensions (overall quality, adherence to evidence, sustainability and level of improvement).ResultsAt first assessment, seven of eight IF sites and four of eight comparison sites had implemented a PC-MHI program. Our qualitative assessment suggested that experts rated IF sites’ programs higher than comparison sites’ programs with one exception. At final assessment, all eight IF but only five comparison sites had implemented a PC-MHI program. Again, experts rated IF sites’ programs higher than their matched comparison sites with one exception. Over time, all ratings improved in five of seven IF sites and two of three comparison sites.ConclusionsImplementing complex evidence-based programs, particularly in settings that lack infrastructure, resources and support for such efforts, is challenging. Findings suggest that a blend of external expert and internal regional facilitation strategies that implementation scientists have developed and tested can improve PC-MHI program uptake, quality and adherence to evidence in primary care clinics with these challenges. However, not all sites showed these improvements. To be successful, facilitators likely need at least a moderate level of leaders’ support, including provision of basic resources. Additionally, we found that IF and strength of leadership structure may have a synergistic effect on ability to implement higher quality and evidence-based programs.

Primary Care-Mental Health Integration in the VA Health System: Associations Between Provider Staffing and Quality of Depression Care.

The study examined whether staffing of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) services in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health system is related to quality of depression care. Site surveys and administrative data from 349 VA facilities for fiscal year 2013 were used to calculate PCMHI staffing (full-time equivalents) per 10,000 primary care patients and discipline-specific staffing proportions for PCMHI psychologists, social workers, nurses, and psychiatric medication prescribers. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted at the facility level and assessed associations between PCMHI staffing ratios and the following indicators of depression treatment in the three months following a new episode of depression: any antidepressant receipt, adequacy of antidepressant receipt, any psychotherapy receipt, and psychotherapy engagement (three or more visits). Higher facility PCMHI staffing ratios were associated with a greater percentage of patients who received any psychotherapy treatment (B=1.16, p<.01) and who engaged in psychotherapy (B=.39, p<.01). When analyses controlled for total PCMHI staffing, the proportion of social workers as part of PCMHI was positively correlated with the percentage of patients with adequate antidepressant treatment continuation (B=3.16, p=.03). The proportion of nurses in PCMHI was negatively associated with the percentage of patients with engagement in psychotherapy (B=-2.83, p=.02). PCMHI programs with greater overall staffing ratios demonstrated better performance on indicators of psychotherapy for depression but not on indicators of antidepressant treatment. Further investigation is needed to determine whether differences in discipline-specific staffing play a causal role in driving associated differences in receipt of treatment.

Evaluation of an implementation facilitation strategy for settings that experience significant implementation barriers

Panel overview Though several implementation and quality improvement strategies have been shown to be effective in implementing programs and practices in routine clinical settings [1,2], little work has been done in developing and testing implementation strategies in settings that experience significant implementation barriers. This VA funded study evaluated a highly partnered implementation facilitation (IF) strategy [3] within the context of a Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) mandate for implementation of Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) [4]. The IF strategy consisted of a national expert external facilitator (EF) and two internal regional facilitators (IRFs) who partnered with regional, medical center, and clinic leadership and staff in two VA regional networks to implement PC-MHI. Facilitators helped partners design/adapt their PC-MHI programs, develop site-specific implementation plans, and identify/address implementation barriers. They also identified and engaged key stakeholders at all organizational levels; conducted academic detailing, marketing, staff training, patient education, formative evaluation, and audit and feedback; assisted with technical issues; and established learning collaboratives. The EF had expertise in the evidence-base for PC-MHI and implementation activities. The IRF had protected time to support implementation activities, was embedded within the clinical organization at the regional level, and was familiar with local and regional organizational structures, procedures, culture, and clinical processes. We used a quasi-experimental, Hybrid Type III design [5] and mixed methods to test effectiveness of the IF strategy and document IF activities. National VA MH leadership has adopted this IF strategy for sites facing challenges to adopting evidencebased practices [4,6,7]. This panel presents findings from the project’s three components: A quantitative study of facilitation outcomes, a qualitative study of the facilitation process and its outcomes, and a qualitative study of facilitation skill transfer.

VA primary care-mental health integration: patient characteristics and receipt of mental health services, 2008-2010.

In 2007, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health system began nationwide implementation of primary care-mental health integration (PC-MHI) programs to enhance mental health access and promote treatment of common mental health conditions for patients in primary care settings. This report describes patients initiating PC-MHI services in fiscal years (FYs) 2008-2010, including those who received prior mental health services. Using VA administrative records, the investigators examined characteristics and services utilization of individuals who initiated PC-MHI services in FY 2008 (N=76,985), FY 2009 (N=107,417), or FY 2010 (N=149,938). PC-MHI service initiation increased by 95%, from 76,985 to 149,938 veterans. Over time, new user cohorts were increasingly younger, newer to VA services, and less likely to have received VA mental health treatment in the prior year. This study documents substantial expansion in VA PC-MHI program activity. PC-MHI program expansion may increase access to mental health services in primary care settings.

Primary Care–Mental Health Integration Programs in the Veterans Affairs Health System Serve a Different Patient Population Than Specialty Mental Health Clinics

To assess whether Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) programs within the Veterans Affairs (VA) health system provide services to patient subgroups that may be underrepresented in specialty mental health care, including older patients and women, and to explore whether PC-MHI served individuals with less severe mental health disorders compared to specialty mental health clinics. Data were obtained from the VA National Patient Care Database for a random sample of VA patients, and primary care patients with an ICD-9-CM mental health diagnosis (N = 243,806) in 2009 were identified. Demographic and clinical characteristics between patients who received mental health treatment exclusively in a specialty mental health clinic (n = 128,248) or exclusively in a PC-MHI setting (n = 8,485) were then compared. Characteristics of patients who used both types of services were also explored. Compared to patients treated in specialty mental health clinics, PC-MHI service users were more likely to be aged 65 years or older (26.4% vs 17.9%, P < .001) and female (8.6% vs 7.7%, P = .003). PC-MHI patients were more likely than specialty mental health clinic patients to be diagnosed with a depressive disorder other than major depression, an unspecified anxiety disorder, or an adjustment disorder (P < .001) and less likely to be diagnosed with more severe disorders, including bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychotic disorders, and alcohol or substance dependence (P < .001). Primary Care-Mental Health Integration within the VA health system reaches demographic subgroups that are traditionally less likely to use specialty mental health care. By treating patients with less severe mental health disorders, PC-MHI appears to expand upon, rather than duplicate, specialty care services.

Initiation of Primary Care—Mental Health Integration Programs in the VA Health System: Associations With Psychiatric Diagnoses in Primary Care

Initiation of Primary Care—Mental Health Integration Programs in the VA Health System: Associations With Psychiatric Diagnoses in Primary Care

Primary care–mental health integration and treatment retention among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans.

Despite the high prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and medical comorbidity among veterans from Iraq/Afghanistan (OEF/OIF), keeping these patients engaged in health care is challenging. Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI), an initiative in the Veterans Health Administration (VA), sought to improve access to mental health care from within primary care. This study examined the lag between first PC-MHI visit and next mental/medical care visit, if any, and the relationship of PC-MHI with short-term (subsequent year) and long-term (4 years later) use of VA. We identified 2,470 OEF/OIF veterans receiving care during fiscal year 2006 (FY06) in a regional VA health care system. Unconditional survival analysis modeled time to next mental/medical visit and logistic regression modeled short- and long-term care as a function of PC-MHI, demographics, and clinical covariates. Of 181 patients in the PC-MHI program, 60%/18% returned for mental/medical care within 1 month, and 82%/74% within 1 year. Sixty-one percent (1,503) were still using the VA in FY09. Short-term mental care was related to prior-year PC-MHI. Consistent correlates of short- and long-term mental/medical care included physical comorbidity and Priority 1 status. Most patients attended mental health appointments subsequent to PC-MHI, and PC-MHI was correlated with mental health treatment retention in adjusted models for our cohort. Need for treatment, notably VA Priority 1 status and physical comorbidity, were the primary correlates of care-seeking. Developing innovative approaches to engaging new veterans in care remains imperative as multiple options will be necessary to meet the needs of these complex patients.

Initiation of Primary Care—Mental Health Integration Programs in the VA Health System

Providing collaborative mental health treatment within primary care settings improves depression outcomes and may improve detection of mental disorders. Few studies have assessed the effect of collaborative mental health treatment programs on diagnosis of mental disorders in primary care populations. In 2008, many Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities implemented collaborative care programs, as part of the VA's Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) program. To assess the prevalence of diagnosed mental health conditions among primary care patient populations in association with PC-MHI programs, overall and for patient subpopulations that may be less likely to receive mental health treatment. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, we evaluated whether the rates of psychiatric diagnoses among primary care patient populations at 294 VA facilities changed from fiscal year (FY)07 to FY08, and whether trends differed at facilities with PC-MHI encounters in FY08. Subgroup analyses examined whether trends differed by patient age and race/ethnicity. SUBJECTS, MEASURES, AND RESULTS: From FY07 to FY08, the prevalence of diagnosed depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and alcohol abuse increased more in the 137 facilities with PC-MHI program encounters than in the 157 facilities without these encounters. Increases were more likely among patients who were younger (18-64) and white. Initiation of PC-MHI programs was associated with elevated diagnosis patterns, which may enhance recognition of mental health needs among primary care patients. Increases in diagnosis prevalence were not uniform across patient subgroups. Further research is needed on treatment processes and outcomes for individuals receiving services in PC-MHI programs.